220
Appendix 13c: POTENTIAL EXPLOITATION SCORE TABLE












(Attached with a system of criteria for assessing the level of potential exploitation - Appendix 5a)
SELF-TRAVEL RESOURCES
NATURAL
Investment level | Organization service | Customer Exploitation | |
Point | Point | Point | |
SUB-REGION I: QUANG BINH - NORTH OF HUE CITY | |||
1. Phong Nha - Ke Bang National Park 2. Bau Tro 3. Ngang Pass 4. Nhat Le Beach - Canh Duong 5. Vung Chua - Yen Island 6. Breaking the Crane Sea 7. Bang Mineral Spring 8. Cua Tung Beach , Cua Viet 9. Con Co Island 10. Vinh Thanh Beach – Vinh Kim 11. Ho Ai Tu 12. Ru Linh primeval forest 13. Phong Dien Beach – Quang Dien | |||
SUB-REGION 2: NORTH OF HUE CITY - QUANG NGAI | |||
1. Bach Ma National Park 2. Lang Co Beach – Photo by Duong 3. Hai Van Mountain 4. Tam Giang Lagoon – Cau Hai 5. Elephant Stream – Nhi Ho 6. Ba Na Mountain – Suoi Mo 7. Son Tra Peninsula 8. Nam O Beach – Xuan Thieu 9. My Khe Beach – Non Nuoc 10. Thanh Binh Beach 11. Cu Lao Cham 12. Dien Ngoc Beach (Quang Nam) 13. Cua Dai Beach (Hoi An) 14. Tam Thanh Beach – Tam Hai 15. Suoi Tien 16. My Khe – Cua Dai Beach ( Ngai District) 17. Rang Beach – Dung Quat 18. Ly Son Island 19. Milk Mountain | |||
Maybe you are interested!
-
Research on potential and solutions for developing ecotourism in some key tourist areas of the North Central region - 31 -
Solutions for tourism development in Tien Lang - 10
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism, tourism development
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
- District People's Committees and authorities of communes with tourist attractions should support, promote, and provide necessary information to people, helping them improve their knowledge about tourism. Raise tourism awareness for local people.
*
* *
Due to limited knowledge and research time, the thesis inevitably has shortcomings. Therefore, I look forward to receiving guidance from teachers, experts as well as your comments to make the thesis more complete.
Chapter III Conclusion
Through the issues presented in Chapter II, we can come to some conclusions:
Based on the strengths of available tourism resources, the types of tourism in Tien Lang that need to be promoted in the coming time are sightseeing and resort tourism, discovery tourism, weekend tourism. To improve the quality and diversify tourism products, Tien Lang district needs to combine with local cultural tourism resources, at the same time combine with surrounding areas, build rich tourism products. The strengths of Tien Lang tourism are eco-tourism and cultural tourism, so developing Tien Lang tourism must always go hand in hand with restoring and preserving types of cultural tourism resources. Some necessary measures to support and improve the efficiency of exploiting tourism resources in Tien Lang are: strengthening the construction of technical facilities and labor force serving tourism, actively promoting and advertising tourism, and expanding forms of capital mobilization for tourism development.
CONCLUDE
I Conclusion
1. Based on the results achieved within the framework of the thesis's needs, some basic conclusions can be drawn as follows:
Tien Lang is a locality with great potential for tourism development. The relatively abundant cultural tourism resources and ecological tourism resources have great appeal to tourists. Based on this potential, Tien Lang can build a unique tourism industry that is competitive enough with other localities within Hai Phong city and neighboring areas.
In recent years, the exploitation of the advantages of resources to develop tourism and build tourist routes in Tien Lang has not been commensurate with the available potential. In terms of quantity, many resource objects have not been brought into the purpose of tourism development. In terms of time, the regular service time has not been extended to attract more visitors. Infrastructure and technical facilities are still weak. The labor force is still thin and weak in terms of expertise. Tourism programs and routes have not been organized properly, the exploitation content is still monotonous, so it has not attracted many visitors. Although resources have not been mobilized much for tourism development, they are facing the risk of destruction and degradation.
2. Based on the results of investigation, analysis, synthesis, evaluation and selective absorption of research results of related topics, the thesis has proposed a number of necessary solutions to improve the efficiency of exploiting tourism resources in Tien Lang such as: promoting the restoration and conservation of tourism resources, focusing on investment and key exploitation of ecotourism resources, strengthening the construction of infrastructure and tourism workforce. Expanding forms of capital mobilization. In addition, the thesis has built a number of tourist routes of Hai Phong in which Tien Lang tourism resources play an important role.
Exploiting Tien Lang tourism resources for tourism development is currently facing many difficulties. The above measures, if applied synchronously, will likely bring new prospects for the local tourism industry, contributing to making Tien Lang tourism an important economic sector in the district's economic structure.
REFERENCES
1. Nhuan Ha, Trinh Minh Hien, Tran Phuong, Hai Phong - Historical and cultural relics, Hai Phong Publishing House, 1993
2. Hai Phong City History Council, Hai Phong Gazetteer, Hai Phong Publishing House, 1990.
3. Hai Phong City History Council, History of Tien Lang District Party Committee, Hai Phong Publishing House, 1990.
4. Hai Phong City History Council, University of Social Sciences and Humanities, VNU, Hai Phong Place Names Encyclopedia, Hai Phong Publishing House. 2001.
5. Law on Cultural Heritage and documents guiding its implementation, National Political Publishing House, Hanoi, 2003.
6. Tran Duc Thanh, Lecture on Tourism Geography, Faculty of Tourism, University of Social Sciences and Humanities, VNU, 2006
7. Hai Phong Center for Social Sciences and Humanities, Some typical cultural heritages of Hai Phong, Hai Phong Publishing House, 2001
8. Nguyen Ngoc Thao (editor-in-chief, Tourism Geography, Hai Phong Publishing House, two volumes (2001-2002)
9. Nguyen Minh Tue and group of authors, Hai Phong Tourism Geography, Ho Chi Minh City Publishing House, 1997.
10. Nguyen Thanh Son, Hai Phong Tourism Territory Organization, Associate Doctoral Thesis in Geological Geography, Hanoi, 1996.
11. Decision No. 2033/QD – UB on detailed planning of Tien Lang town, Hai Phong city until 2020.
12. Department of Culture, Information, Hai Phong Museum, Hai Phong relics
- National ranked scenic spot, Hai Phong Publishing House, 2005. 13. Tien Lang District People's Committee, Economic Development Planning -
Culture - Society of Tien Lang district to 2010.
14.Website www.HaiPhong.gov.vn
APPENDIX 1
List of national ranked monuments
STT
Name of the monument
Number, year of decisiondetermine
Location
1
Gam Temple
938 VH/QĐ04/08/1992
Cam Khe Village- Toan Thang commune
2
Doc Hau Temple
9381 VH/QĐ04/08/1992
Doc Hau Village –Toan Thang commune
3
Cuu Doi Communal House
3207 VH/QĐDecember 30, 1991
Zone II of townTien Lang
4
Ha Dai Temple
938 VH/QĐ04/08/1992
Ha Dai Village –Tien Thanh commune
APPENDIX II
STT
Name of the monument
Number, year of decision
Location
1
Phu Ke Pagoda Temple
178/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Zone 1 - townTien Lang
2
Trung Lang Temple
178/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Zone 4 – townTien Lang
3
Bao Khanh Pagoda
1900/QD-UBAugust 24, 2006
Nam Tu Village -Kien Thiet commune
4
Bach Da Pagoda
1792/QD-UB11/11/2002
Hung Thang Commune
5
Ngoc Dong Temple
177/QD-UBNovember 27, 2005
Tien Thanh Commune
6
Tomb of Minister TSNhu Van Lan
2848/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2003
Nam Tu Village -Kien Thiet commune
7
Canh Son Stone Temple
2160/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2003
Van Doi Commune –Doan Lap
8
Meiji Temple
2259/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2002
Toan Thang Commune
9
Tien Doi Noi Temple
477/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2005
Doan Lap Commune
10
Tu Doi Temple
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Doan Lap Commune
11
Duyen Lao Temple
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Tien Minh Commune
12
Dinh Xuan Uc Pagoda
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Bac Hung Commune
13
Chu Khe Pagoda
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Hung Thang Commune
14
Dong Dinh
2848/QD-UBNovember 21, 2002
Vinh Quang Commune
15
President's Memorial HouseTon Duc Thang
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
NT Quy Cao
Ha Dai Temple
Ben Vua Temple
Tien Lang hot spring
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 16pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 6pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 12pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
Identify Rating Levels and Rating Scales
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism,quan lan,quang ninh,ecology,ecotourism,minh chau,van don,geography,geographical basis,tourism development,science
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
of the islanders. Therefore, this indicator will be divided into two sub-indicators:
a1. Natural tourism attractiveness a2. Cultural tourism attractiveness
b. Tourist capacity
The two island communes in Quan Lan have different capacities to receive tourists. Minh Chau Commune is home to many standard hotels and resorts, attracting high-income domestic and international tourists. Meanwhile, Quan Lan Commune has many motels mainly built and operated by local people, so the scale and quality are not high, and will be suitable for ordinary tourists such as students.
c. Time of exploitation of Quan Lan Island Commune:
Quan Lan tourism is seasonal due to weather and climate conditions and festivals only take place on certain days of the year, specifically in spring. In Quan Lan commune, the period from April to June and from September to November is considered the best time to visit Quan Lan because the cultural tourism activities are mainly associated with festivals taking place during this time.
Minh Chau island commune:
Tourism exploitation time is all year round, because this is a place with a number of tourist attractions with diverse ecosystems such as Bai Tu Long National Park Research Center, Tram forest, Turtle Laying Beach, so besides coming to the beach for tourism and vacation in the summer, Minh Chau will attract research groups to come for tourism combined with research at other times of the year.
d. Sustainability
The sustainability of ecotourism sites in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes depends on the sensitivity of the ecosystems to climate changes.
landscape. In general, these tourist destinations have a fairly high level of sustainability, because they are natural ecosystems, planned and protected. However, if a large number of tourists gather at certain times, it can exceed the carrying capacity and affect the sustainability of the environment (polluted beaches, damaged trees, animals moving away from their habitats, etc.), then the sustainability of the above ecosystems (natural ecosystems, human ecosystems) will also be affected and become less sustainable.
e. Location and accessibility
Both island communes have ports to take tourists to visit from Van Don wharf:
- Quan Lan – Van Don traffic route:
Phuc Thinh – Viet Anh high-speed boat and Quang Minh high-speed boat, depart at 8am and 2pm from Van Don to Quan Lan, and at 7am and 1pm from Quan Lan to Van Don. There are also wooden boats departing at 7am and 1pm.
- Van Don - Minh Chau traffic route:
Chung Huong high-speed train, Minh Chau train, morning 7:30 and afternoon 13:30 from Van Don to Minh Chau, morning 6:30 and afternoon 13:00 from Minh Chau to Van Don.
f. Infrastructure
Despite receiving investment attention, the issue of infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism on Quan Lan Island is still an issue that needs to be resolved because it has a direct impact on the implementation of ecotourism activities. The minimum conditions for serving tourists such as accommodation, electricity, water, communication, especially medical services, and security work need to be given top priority. Ecotourism spots in Minh Chau commune are assessed to have better infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism because there are quite complete and synchronous conditions for serving tourists, meeting many needs of domestic and foreign tourists.
3.2.1.4. Determine assessment levels and assessment scales
Corresponding to the levels of each criterion, the index is the score of those levels in the order of 4, 3, 2, 1 decreasing according to the standard of each level: very attractive (4), attractive (3), average (2), less attractive (1).
3.2.1.5. Determining the coefficients of the criteria
For the assessment of DLST in the two communes of Quan Lan and Minh Chau islands, the students added evaluation coefficients to show the importance of the criteria and indicators as follows:
Coefficient 3 with criteria: Attractiveness, Exploitation time. These are the 2 most important criteria for attracting tourists to tourism in general and eco-tourism in particular, so they have the highest coefficient.
Coefficient 2 with criteria: Capacity, Infrastructure, Location and accessibility . Because the assessment area is an island commune of Van Don district, the above criteria are selected by the author with appropriate coefficients at the average level.
Coefficient 1 with criteria: Sustainability. Quan Lan has natural and human-made ecotourism sites, with high biodiversity and little impact from local human factors. Most of the ecotourism sites are still wild, so they are highly sustainable.
3.2.1.6. Results of DLST assessment on Quan Lan island
a. Assessment of the potential for natural tourism development
For Minh Chau commune:
+ Natural tourism attractiveness is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined as average (2 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of Capacity criterion is 2 x 2 = 4.
+ Exploitation time is long (4 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Exploitation time criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is assessed as good (3 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 3 x 2 = 6 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Minh Chau commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 4 + 12 + 4 + 4 + 6 = 42 points
Similar assessment for Quan Lan commune, we have the following table:
Table 3.3: Assessment of the potential for natural ecotourism development in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of self-tourismof course
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
CommuneMinh Chau
12
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
42/52
Quan CommuneLan
6
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
33/52
b. Assessment of the potential for humanistic tourism development
For Quan Lan commune:
+ The attractiveness of human tourism is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined to be large (3 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Capacity criterion is 3 x 2 = 6.
+ Mining time is average (3 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Mining time criterion is 3 x 3 = 9.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points.
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is rated as average (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Quan Lan commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 6 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 4 = 36 points.
Similar assessment with Minh Chau commune we have the following table:
Table 3.4: Assessment of the potential for developing humanistic eco-tourism in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of human tourismliterature
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Quan CommuneLan
12
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
39/52
Minh CommuneChau
6
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
36/52
Basically, both Minh Chau and Quan Lan localities have quite favorable conditions for developing ecotourism. However, Quan Lan commune has more advantages to develop ecotourism in a humanistic direction, because this is an area with many famous historical relics such as Quan Lan Communal House, Quan Lan Pagoda, Temple worshiping the hero Tran Khanh Du, ... along with local festivals held annually such as the wind praying ceremony (March 15), Quan Lan festival (June 10-19); due to its location near the port and long exploitation time, the beaches in Quan Lan commune (especially Quan Lan beach) are no longer hygienic and clean to ensure the needs of tourists coming to relax and swim; this is also an area with many beautiful landscapes such as Got Beo wind pass, Ong Phong head, Voi Voi cave, but the ability to access these places is still very limited (dirt hill road, lots of gravel and rocks), especially during rainy and windy times; In addition, other natural resources such as mangrove forests and sea worms have not been really exploited for tourism purposes and ecotourism development. On the contrary, Minh Chau commune has more advantages in developing ecotourism in the direction of natural tourism, this is an area with diverse ecosystems such as at Rua De Beach, Bai Tu Long National Park Conservation Center...; Minh Chau beach is highly appreciated for its natural beauty and cleanliness, ranked in the top ten most beautiful beaches in Vietnam; Minh Chau commune is also home to Tram forest with a large area and a purity of up to 90%, suitable for building bridges through the forest (a very effective type of natural ecotourism currently applied by many countries) for tourists to sightsee, as well as for the purpose of studying and researching.
Figure 3.1: Thenmala Forest Bridge (India) Source: https://www.thenmalaecotourism.com/(August 21, 2019)
3.2.2. Using SWOT matrix to evaluate Quan Lan island tourism
General assessment of current tourism activities of Quan Lan island is shown through the following SWOT matrix:
Table 3.5: SWOT matrix evaluating tourism activities on Quan Lan island
Internal agent
Strengths- There is a lot of potential for tourism development, especially natural ecotourism and humanistic ecotourism.- The unskilled labor force is relatively abundant.- resource environmentunpolluted, still
Weaknesses- Poorly developed infrastructure, especially traffic routes to tourist destinations on the island.- The team of professional staff is still weak.- Tourism products in general
quite wild, originalintact
general and DLST in particularalone is monotonous.
External agents
Opportunity- Tourism is a key industry in the socio-economic development strategy of the province and Van Don economic zone.- Quan Lan was selected as a pilot area for eco-tourism development within the framework of the green growth project between Quang Ninh province and the Japanese organization JICA.- The flow of tourists and especially ecotourism in the world tends toincreasing
Challenge- Weather and climate change abnormally.- Competition in tourism products is increasingly fierce, especially with other localities in the province such as Ha Long, Mong Cai...- Awareness of tourists, especially domestic tourists, about ecotourism and nature conservation is not high.
Through summary analysis using SWOT matrix we see that:
To exploit strengths and take advantage of opportunities, it is necessary to:
- Diversify products and service types (build more tourism routes aimed at specific needs of tourists: experiential tourism immersed in nature, spiritual cultural tourism...)
- Effective exploitation of resources and differentiated products (natural resources and human resources)
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: #0D0D0D; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -3pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Symbol, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:Wingdings; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:Cambria, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: #212121; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
Hoang Thanh Phuc (2009), "Research on Current Status and Solutions for Developing Scattered Forestry Planting in Thai Nguyen Province", Master's Thesis, -
Current status, potential and solutions for developing team building tourism in Hai Phong - 13



















(Note: Some resources have such low exploitation level that experts may not give points. Thank you!)
221
Appendix 14a: KEY SUCCESS FACTORS SCORING TABLE FOR NORTH CENTRAL TOURISM REGION AND KEY FOCUSES
Level 1 (1 st level) Level 2 (2 nd level)
Key Elements (Assessed element) | VDLTB Point | Dependent factors (Assessment factor) | VDLTB | SUB-REGION I | SUB-REGION II | ||
Point | KV1 KV2 | KV1 | KV2 | KV3 | |||
Score Score | Point | Point | Point |
1. Location advantage Diversity of natural resources

(Local resources) Attractiveness of local resources

2. Promotion
(Marketing)
Destination information

Product price

Special products

3. Support Services & Infrastructure Support Services and Infrastructure

4. Human resource training Employee training

Community Education Force

5. Policy, management

6. Environmental factors
NN support

Management of tourism organization

Security, safety Environmental protection
Note : - Sub-region 1: From Quang Binh - North of Thua Thien Hue (to Phong Dien and Quang Dien districts), including: Region 1 (KV1): Phong Nha National Park; Ke Bang - Nhat Le - Canh Duong Beach (Quang Binh) and vicinity; Cua Tung - Cua Viet Beach (Quang Tri) extending to Phong Dien Beach; Quang Dien (Thua Thien Hue) and vicinity.
- Sub-region II: From near the north of Thua Thien Hue (Huong Tra district) - Quang Ngai, including: Region 1 (KV1): Canh Duong Beach - Bach Ma - Lang Co (Thua Thien Hue) - Ba Na (Da Nang) and vicinity; Region 2 (KV2): My Khe Beach - Bac My An - Non Nuoc (Da Nang) - Cua Dai - Cu Lao Cham (Quang Nam) and vicinity; Region 3 (KV3): My Khe Beach - Cua Dai (Quang Ngai) and vicinity.
Appendix 14b: SOME EXPERTS' OPINIONS ON SCORING BY CSFs METHOD
( Note: Mail 1: Expert Dinh Kim Ha - Head of Research Department and Manager of Southeast Department , Southern Economic Research Center - Ministry of Planning and Investment; Mail 2: Expert Ly Thien Binh - Head of Science Department, Ho Chi Minh City College of Economics. Both experts participated in the survey team of VDLBTB natural resources of Ho Chi Minh City Institute of Economic Research with the author in August 2010)
Appendix 15: EXPERT INVESTIGATION
----- -----
- Expert's full name:..........................................................................................
- Work unit : ...................................................................................................
- Position:................................................................................................
- Academic title, degree (if any): ...................................................................................
Expert signature
---------------------------------
Question 1: According to the key points identified in the thesis (with a list of key areas and resources and a planning map), many experts believe that the development of tourism in the VDBTB by 2020 will still mainly be in these key resources and areas . Do you agree with the above assessment?
Agree No No opinion Other opinions................................................................................................
................................................................ ................................................................ ..........................
................................................................ ................................................................ ..........................
Question 2: Given the current situation and development potential , we would like you to predict the growth rate of tourist arrivals for each period according to the following options: (Please fill in a certain number in 1 option. In which PA I: Low option ; PA II: Medium ; PA III: High).
PA TARGETS 2013 2015 2020
DIRECTIONInternational Guests
CASE I Domestic Customers
DIRECTIONInternational Guests
PLOT II Domestic Customers
DIRECTIONInternational Guests
PLOT III Domestic Customers
(Note: Details of the forecast bases are attached after this form, including: Statistics table of the number of visitors to VLDBTB;
Summary of tourism preparation projects in the period 2010 - 2020 and other indicators ...)
Question 3: According to our survey in 2010, the average length of stay of international ecotourism visitors was 0.84 days and domestic visitors was 0.63 days ( larger than the survey in 2006 of Thua Thien Hue Tourism Association for international visitors was 0.78 days and domestic visitors was 0.52 days). Could you please predict the average length of stay of 01 ecotourism visitor in VDLTB by 2020?
PA TARGETS 2013 2015 2020
DIRECTION
International Guests
CASE I Domestic Customers
DIRECTION
International Guests
PLOT II Domestic Customers
DIRECTION
International Guests
PLOT III Domestic Passengers
(Note: Attached to this form is a summary table of average guest stay days.
Tourism over the years and forecast to 2020 of Vietnam and localities (VDLBTB)
Question 4: According to some studies in 2006, the average number of workers for a tourist to some VDLB localities is about 0.98 to 1.38 workers/guest. Compared with the upcoming actual situation in VDLB, according to your prediction, what is this ratio?
No. TARGETS 2013 2015 2020
1. Option I
2. Option II
3. Option III
Question 5 : The goal set out in the socio-economic development strategy of localities from now until 2020 is to strive for tourism revenue to increase by 20% annually. Based on the GDP growth data of the tourism and eco-tourism industry in recent years, what do you think the GDP growth rate of eco-tourism will be?
No. INDICATORS 2015/2010 2020/2015
1. Option I
2. Option II
3. Option III
(Note: attached is the proportion and GDP growth figures of tourism from 2006 - 2010 )
Question 6: According to the 2010 survey data, the average spending of international ecotourism visitors at VDLTB is 941,370 VND/visitor day, domestic ecotourism visitors is 388,930 VND/visitor day. According to the forecast of Thua Thien Hue Tourism Association, the average spending of an ecotourism visitor day from 2013 to 2020 according to the following 3 options:
- C1 (International) = 950,000 VND; C1 (Local) = 400,000 VND
- C2 (Local ) = 1,200,000 VND; C1 (Local ) = 450,000 VND
- C3 (International) = 1,500,000 VND; C1 (Geographic) = 650,000 VND
It is estimated that this spending level can be kept stable for many years to come. As an expert in the tourism industry; do you agree with the above assessment?
Agree No No opinion Other opinions................................................................................................
................................................................ ................................................................ ..........................
................................................................ ................................................................ ..........................
Question 7: According to many experts and the Thua Thien Hue Tourism Association, by 2020, the eco-tourism market will still mainly be the tourist market to the Central Highlands (exploited based on the number of tourists to the region); Do you agree with the above assessment?
Agree No No opinion Other opinions ................................................................................................
................................................................ ................................................................ ..........................
................................................................ ................................................................ ..........................
Question 8: According to the estimated data of the General Department of Tourism in 2010, about 30% of tourism workers have received vocational training. Some experts say that this rate in tourism has not changed; Do you agree with the above statement ?
Agree No No opinion Other opinion (suggest for specific number) ........................................................
Thank you very much, Sir or Madam!
(Note: This survey is no longer used to calculate forecasting and assessment indicators on development.)
DLST development at VLDBTB)
Appendix 16a: APPENDIX TO EXPERT INVESTIGATIONS
In the thesis, we used the following expert surveys:
1. Investigation and assessment of tourism potential in VLDBTB:
- The investigation started in April 2010, the author built a system of criteria, a scale , and a multiplier for each evaluation criterion and sent it to 06 experts for comments . After synthesizing and editing , it was sent back to the experts for final comments. All 06 experts agreed with the system of criteria , the scale shown in Appendix 3a and the multiplier for each criterion in section 3.1.2 .
- From May 2010 to January 2011, sent questionnaires to 16 experts for investigation and collection of questionnaires. During this time , the author went to the Central localities 3 times to survey resources and collect data, met with experts to discuss. Especially in August 2010, the author followed the resource survey team in the Central and Central Highlands localities organized by the Ho Chi Minh City Institute of Economic Research and Nhan Thang Tourism Company.
- In January 2011, synthesize, consult with other experts and send back to the scoring expert for final review and comments.
2. Investigation of the level of exploitation of eco-tourism potential: This investigation is parallel to the investigation of potential assessment. However, the questionnaire was only sent to 11 experts, with priority given to experts who participated in the resource survey team (appendix 5a, 5b, 13c).
3. Consulting on zoning : Consulting with 06 experts (Appendix 16b) and discussing with many other experts. Adjusting and sending back for the last time and getting the experts' approval at the end of August 2010.
4. Survey to collect opinions on forecast indicators : The survey form and related documents were sent to 15 experts from the end of March 2011, many experts were directly visited and discussed by the author . In May 2011, the author completed the survey form.
5. Investigation by the method of key success factors (CSFs)
- This survey uses the Delphi method. From January
11/2010 The author has collected documents, summarized methods and related data.
- The questionnaire was sent to 08 experts to ask for their opinions on the factors and their weights (the questionnaire was anonymous). The author received very detailed discussions from the experts. After the first synthesis in April 2011, the author sent it back to the experts to ask for their opinions to adjust the factors and weights .
- The author sent the scoring sheet to the experts at the end of May 2011. Received the sheet and made the first synthesis at the end of June 2011. Sent the first synthesis of the scoring sheet and the first analysis table back to the experts.
- Receive the experts' opinions in August 2011, summarize the second time and send back to the experts at the end of September 2011. Receive opinions in November & December 2011.
In addition, in the thesis we also use quick interviews and exchanges.
with experts being researchers, state managers, resource points etc.
Appendix 17: INTRODUCTION OF SOME ECO-TOURISM POTENTIAL IN THE NORTH CENTRAL REGION
1.1. Phong Nha – Ke Bang National Park
1.2. Bach Ma National Park
1.3. Ba Na Mountain (Chua Mountain)
Northwest
RESOURCES | LOCATION, AREA | CHARACTERISTIC | DLST POTENTIAL |
I. FOREST AND MOUNTAIN RESOURCES | |||
- From 17°21′ to 17°39′ north latitude and from 105°57′ to 106°24′ east longitude, about 50 km north of Dong Hoi city. | - The karst tectonics of the National Park were formed 400 million years ago, from the period Paleozoic Era. Recognized by UNESCO as a World Natural Heritage according to Geological and geomorphological criteria 2003. - There is a system of about 300 large and small caves , considered to be the most beautiful caves. | Potential for development Many types: Cave exploration, Geological exploration, geomorphology, |
- Located in 06 communes of Bo Trach district - Quang Binh province, bordering Hin Namno nature reserve in Khammouan province ( Laos ) to the west.
- About 200,000 hectares wide, the buffer zone is 1,479.45 km² with a population of 12 communes .
- From 160.05' -16016' latitude
North and 107045 ' – 107053'
East longitude , 40 km from Hue city and 65 km from Da Nang city.
- Belongs to 02 districts Nam Dong and Phu Loc - Thua Thien Hue
Thien Hue.
- Area 22,031 ha.
- Hoa Ninh Commune, Hoa Vang District, 40 km southwest of Da Nang.
- 8,838 ha wide, buffer zone
The cave has the world's top value with 4 most outstanding points: the longest underground rivers , the highest and widest cave entrance, the widest and most beautiful sand banks, and the most beautiful stalactites .
- Primary forest, vascular plants with 152 families, 511 genotypes, 876 vascular plant species, of which 38 species are listed in the Vietnam Red Book and 25 species are listed in the World Red Book . Fauna : is the habitat of 140 species of mammals belonging to 31 families and 10 orders. 302 species of birds, of which at least 43 species are listed in the Vietnam Red Book and 19 species are listed in the World Red Book; 81 species of amphibians and reptiles (18 species in the Vietnam Red Book and 6 species in the World Red Book) ; 259 species of butterflies; 72 species of fish, of which 4 are endemic to Vietnam...
- There are high mountain peaks such as Nom peak (1186m), Dlip peak (1,200m)...
- The most pleasant climate of the resorts in the Indochina mountains, it used to be a complete resort with 139 villas, market, bank, post office, swimming pool, tennis court... since 1932.
- Flora: about 1,406 species, many of which are rare and endemic. There are more than 86 species of plants listed as endangered and included in the Vietnam Red Book. Animals: 931 species including: 83 species of mammals, 333 species of birds, 31 species of reptiles, 21 species of frogs, 39 species of fish, 218 species of butterflies, 178 species of leaf-eating beetles, 28 species of termites. Of the total number of species listed, 68 species are listed in the Vietnam Red Book, which are species in need of strict protection...
- Mild climate, average temperature 15 - 20 degrees Celsius, winter nights below 10 degrees Celsius.
- It was planned by the French as a tourist area since 1912.
- Plants: about 136 families, 379 genera and more than 544 species, with 6 named plant species
Sightseeing, relaxation, sightseeing, learning about animals, forest plants , adventure eco-tourism, etc.
Ability to develop many types of tourism : Sightseeing, relaxation ; sightseeing; learning about animals and forest plants ; ecological walking; adventure eco-tourism, etc.
Ability to develop many types: Sightseeing, relaxation ; sightseeing; learning





