26.Khe Thi Cave
Bo Trach | 35.00 | 20 | 0636300 192360 | 1997 | 296 | PN | |
27.Khe Ry Cave | Bo Trach | 18902.00 | 141 | 0635500 192290 | 1997/99 | 298 | PN |
28.Khe Tien Cave | Bo Trach | 520.00 | 15 | 0638800 192505 | 1997 | 300 | PN |
29.Cha Noi Cave | Bo Trach | 401.00 | 15 | 0617400 195010 | 1997 | ||
30. Len Hai Cave | Bo Trach | 305.00 | 10 | 0639800 194440 | 1997 | PN | |
31.Phong Nha Cave Warehouse | Bo Trach | 981.00 | 25 | 0635900 194430 | 1999 | 135 | PN |
32.New Cave | Bo Trach | 424.00 | 18 | 0636000 193450 | 1999 | 550 | PN |
33.Phuc Lam | Bo Trach | 135.00 | 3 | 0638600 194710 | 1999 | PN | |
34. Hang Lanh | Bo Trach | 3753.00 | 114 | 0639000 192740 | 2001 | 185 | PN |
35.Doi Cave | Bo Trach | 453.00 | 24 | 0636609 1928492 | 2001 | 440 | PN |
36. Hang Ca | Bo Trach | 361.00 | 14 | 0638700 192760 | 2001 | 182 | PN |
37. Hang Thoc | Bo Trach | 426.00 | 23 | 0635810 1937863 | 2006 | 60 | PN |
38.Wet Cave | Bo Trach | 50.00 | 10 | 0635575 1938285 | 2001 | 60 | PN |
38.Knowledge Cave | Bo Trach | 154.00 | 18 | 0635575 1938285 | 2001 | 60 | PN |
39.Hang About | Bo Trach | 820.00 | 18 | 0626500 192820 | 2003 | V | |
40. Noise Cave | Bo Trach | 432.00 | 15 | 0631278 1941734 | 2003 | FATHER Y | |
41.Whiskey Cave | Bo Trach | 105.00 | 5 | 0634306 1944183 | 2003 | FATHER Y |
Maybe you are interested!
-
Identify Rating Levels and Rating Scales
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism,quan lan,quang ninh,ecology,ecotourism,minh chau,van don,geography,geographical basis,tourism development,science
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
of the islanders. Therefore, this indicator will be divided into two sub-indicators:
a1. Natural tourism attractiveness a2. Cultural tourism attractiveness
b. Tourist capacity
The two island communes in Quan Lan have different capacities to receive tourists. Minh Chau Commune is home to many standard hotels and resorts, attracting high-income domestic and international tourists. Meanwhile, Quan Lan Commune has many motels mainly built and operated by local people, so the scale and quality are not high, and will be suitable for ordinary tourists such as students.
c. Time of exploitation of Quan Lan Island Commune:
Quan Lan tourism is seasonal due to weather and climate conditions and festivals only take place on certain days of the year, specifically in spring. In Quan Lan commune, the period from April to June and from September to November is considered the best time to visit Quan Lan because the cultural tourism activities are mainly associated with festivals taking place during this time.
Minh Chau island commune:
Tourism exploitation time is all year round, because this is a place with a number of tourist attractions with diverse ecosystems such as Bai Tu Long National Park Research Center, Tram forest, Turtle Laying Beach, so besides coming to the beach for tourism and vacation in the summer, Minh Chau will attract research groups to come for tourism combined with research at other times of the year.
d. Sustainability
The sustainability of ecotourism sites in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes depends on the sensitivity of the ecosystems to climate changes.
landscape. In general, these tourist destinations have a fairly high level of sustainability, because they are natural ecosystems, planned and protected. However, if a large number of tourists gather at certain times, it can exceed the carrying capacity and affect the sustainability of the environment (polluted beaches, damaged trees, animals moving away from their habitats, etc.), then the sustainability of the above ecosystems (natural ecosystems, human ecosystems) will also be affected and become less sustainable.
e. Location and accessibility
Both island communes have ports to take tourists to visit from Van Don wharf:
- Quan Lan – Van Don traffic route:
Phuc Thinh – Viet Anh high-speed boat and Quang Minh high-speed boat, depart at 8am and 2pm from Van Don to Quan Lan, and at 7am and 1pm from Quan Lan to Van Don. There are also wooden boats departing at 7am and 1pm.
- Van Don - Minh Chau traffic route:
Chung Huong high-speed train, Minh Chau train, morning 7:30 and afternoon 13:30 from Van Don to Minh Chau, morning 6:30 and afternoon 13:00 from Minh Chau to Van Don.
f. Infrastructure
Despite receiving investment attention, the issue of infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism on Quan Lan Island is still an issue that needs to be resolved because it has a direct impact on the implementation of ecotourism activities. The minimum conditions for serving tourists such as accommodation, electricity, water, communication, especially medical services, and security work need to be given top priority. Ecotourism spots in Minh Chau commune are assessed to have better infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism because there are quite complete and synchronous conditions for serving tourists, meeting many needs of domestic and foreign tourists.
3.2.1.4. Determine assessment levels and assessment scales
Corresponding to the levels of each criterion, the index is the score of those levels in the order of 4, 3, 2, 1 decreasing according to the standard of each level: very attractive (4), attractive (3), average (2), less attractive (1).
3.2.1.5. Determining the coefficients of the criteria
For the assessment of DLST in the two communes of Quan Lan and Minh Chau islands, the students added evaluation coefficients to show the importance of the criteria and indicators as follows:
Coefficient 3 with criteria: Attractiveness, Exploitation time. These are the 2 most important criteria for attracting tourists to tourism in general and eco-tourism in particular, so they have the highest coefficient.
Coefficient 2 with criteria: Capacity, Infrastructure, Location and accessibility . Because the assessment area is an island commune of Van Don district, the above criteria are selected by the author with appropriate coefficients at the average level.
Coefficient 1 with criteria: Sustainability. Quan Lan has natural and human-made ecotourism sites, with high biodiversity and little impact from local human factors. Most of the ecotourism sites are still wild, so they are highly sustainable.
3.2.1.6. Results of DLST assessment on Quan Lan island
a. Assessment of the potential for natural tourism development
For Minh Chau commune:
+ Natural tourism attractiveness is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined as average (2 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of Capacity criterion is 2 x 2 = 4.
+ Exploitation time is long (4 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Exploitation time criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is assessed as good (3 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 3 x 2 = 6 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Minh Chau commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 4 + 12 + 4 + 4 + 6 = 42 points
Similar assessment for Quan Lan commune, we have the following table:
Table 3.3: Assessment of the potential for natural ecotourism development in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of self-tourismof course
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
CommuneMinh Chau
12
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
42/52
Quan CommuneLan
6
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
33/52
b. Assessment of the potential for humanistic tourism development
For Quan Lan commune:
+ The attractiveness of human tourism is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined to be large (3 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Capacity criterion is 3 x 2 = 6.
+ Mining time is average (3 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Mining time criterion is 3 x 3 = 9.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points.
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is rated as average (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Quan Lan commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 6 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 4 = 36 points.
Similar assessment with Minh Chau commune we have the following table:
Table 3.4: Assessment of the potential for developing humanistic eco-tourism in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of human tourismliterature
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Quan CommuneLan
12
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
39/52
Minh CommuneChau
6
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
36/52
Basically, both Minh Chau and Quan Lan localities have quite favorable conditions for developing ecotourism. However, Quan Lan commune has more advantages to develop ecotourism in a humanistic direction, because this is an area with many famous historical relics such as Quan Lan Communal House, Quan Lan Pagoda, Temple worshiping the hero Tran Khanh Du, ... along with local festivals held annually such as the wind praying ceremony (March 15), Quan Lan festival (June 10-19); due to its location near the port and long exploitation time, the beaches in Quan Lan commune (especially Quan Lan beach) are no longer hygienic and clean to ensure the needs of tourists coming to relax and swim; this is also an area with many beautiful landscapes such as Got Beo wind pass, Ong Phong head, Voi Voi cave, but the ability to access these places is still very limited (dirt hill road, lots of gravel and rocks), especially during rainy and windy times; In addition, other natural resources such as mangrove forests and sea worms have not been really exploited for tourism purposes and ecotourism development. On the contrary, Minh Chau commune has more advantages in developing ecotourism in the direction of natural tourism, this is an area with diverse ecosystems such as at Rua De Beach, Bai Tu Long National Park Conservation Center...; Minh Chau beach is highly appreciated for its natural beauty and cleanliness, ranked in the top ten most beautiful beaches in Vietnam; Minh Chau commune is also home to Tram forest with a large area and a purity of up to 90%, suitable for building bridges through the forest (a very effective type of natural ecotourism currently applied by many countries) for tourists to sightsee, as well as for the purpose of studying and researching.
Figure 3.1: Thenmala Forest Bridge (India) Source: https://www.thenmalaecotourism.com/(August 21, 2019)
3.2.2. Using SWOT matrix to evaluate Quan Lan island tourism
General assessment of current tourism activities of Quan Lan island is shown through the following SWOT matrix:
Table 3.5: SWOT matrix evaluating tourism activities on Quan Lan island
Internal agent
Strengths- There is a lot of potential for tourism development, especially natural ecotourism and humanistic ecotourism.- The unskilled labor force is relatively abundant.- resource environmentunpolluted, still
Weaknesses- Poorly developed infrastructure, especially traffic routes to tourist destinations on the island.- The team of professional staff is still weak.- Tourism products in general
quite wild, originalintact
general and DLST in particularalone is monotonous.
External agents
Opportunity- Tourism is a key industry in the socio-economic development strategy of the province and Van Don economic zone.- Quan Lan was selected as a pilot area for eco-tourism development within the framework of the green growth project between Quang Ninh province and the Japanese organization JICA.- The flow of tourists and especially ecotourism in the world tends toincreasing
Challenge- Weather and climate change abnormally.- Competition in tourism products is increasingly fierce, especially with other localities in the province such as Ha Long, Mong Cai...- Awareness of tourists, especially domestic tourists, about ecotourism and nature conservation is not high.
Through summary analysis using SWOT matrix we see that:
To exploit strengths and take advantage of opportunities, it is necessary to:
- Diversify products and service types (build more tourism routes aimed at specific needs of tourists: experiential tourism immersed in nature, spiritual cultural tourism...)
- Effective exploitation of resources and differentiated products (natural resources and human resources)
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: #0D0D0D; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -3pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Symbol, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:Wingdings; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:Cambria, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: #212121; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
Tourism potential and solutions for sustainable tourism development in Phong Nha - Ke Bang National Park, Quang Binh - 2 -
Assessing the potential for ecotourism development in Bai Tu Long National Park - 11 -
Tourism potential and solutions for sustainable tourism development in Phong Nha - Ke Bang National Park, Quang Binh - 12 -
Research on assessing tourism potential with forest products in Ba Vi National Park, Ba Vi district, Hanoi city - 1
42.Climb Cave
Bo Trach | 50.00 | 2 | 0634777 1944130 | 2003 | FATHER Y | ||
43. Hang Trong | Bo Trach | 154.00 | 18 | 0631016 1940300 | 2003 | FATHER Y | |
44. Hang So Doi | Bo Trach | 1125.00 | 16 | 0636768 1937800 | 2003 | 100 | PN |
45. Roadside Cave | Bo Trach | 457.00 | 48 | 0636568 1937800 | 2003 | 120 | PN |
46.So Dua Cave | Bo Trach | 260.00 | 3 | 0636868 1937788 | 2003 | 100 | PN |
47. Hang Va | Bo Trach | 196.00 | 8 | 0636994 1938115 | 2003 | 100 | PN |
48.Nit Cave | Bo Trach | 2205.00 | 53 | 0636749 1934252 | 2003 | 100 | PN |
49.Shortcut Cave | Bo Trach | 90.00 | 2 | 0625800 192880 | 2003 | V | |
50.Kissing Frog Cave | Bo Trach | 150.00 | 5 | 0634318 1944240 | 2003 | FATHER Y | |
51Pond Cave | Bo Trach | 5.00 | 1 | 0634758 1944137 | 2003 | FATHER Y | |
52.Tree Root Cave | Bo Trach | 10.00 | 2 | 0631127 1941484 | 2003 | FATHER Y | |
53.Salt and Pepper | Bo Trach | 421.00 | 118 | 0625910 1946732 | 2005 | FATHER Y | |
54.New Cave | Bo Trach | 408.00 | 21 | 0631200 1940300 | 2005 | FATHER Y | |
55.Klung Cave | Bo Trach | 1086.00 | 73 | 0628287 1924921 | 2005 | V | |
56.Kling Cave | Bo Trach | 120.00 | 15 | 0628287 1924921 | 2005 | V | |
57. Cold Water | Bo Trach | 965.00 | 102 | 0625800 1942300 | 2005 | FATHER Y | |
58.Lau Cave | Bo Trach | 481.00 | 22 | 0626832 1943226 | 2005 | FATHER Y |
59.Addicted Plant
Bo Trach | 162.00 | 53 | 0632785 1930803 | 2005 | 320 | PN | |
60.Bin Dap Cave | Bo Trach | 64.00 | 1 | 0639200 194650 | 2005 | PN | |
61.Doi Cave | Bo Trach | 86.00 | 17 | 0632989 1944544 | 2005 | FATHER Y | |
62.A Cu Cave | Bo Trach | 640.00 | 42 | 0627948 1926528 | 2005 | V | |
63.Water Cave | Bo Trach | 86.00 | 17 | 0627690 1944212 | 2005 | FATHER Y | |
64. Da Trang Cave | Bo Trach | 270.00 | 38 | 0627324 1944427 | 2005 | FATHER Y | |
65.Hob Cave | Bo Trach | 188.00 | 6 | 0617800 194900 | 2005 | ||
66. Hang Duc | Bo Trach | 1334.00 | 5 | 0638639 1944806 | 2005 | 40 | PN |
67. Me Bon Con Cave | Bo Trach | 732.00 | 59 | 0630169 1937099 | 2005 | V | |
68. Hang Khi | Bo Trach | 10.00 | 10 | 0627690 1944212 | 2005 | FATHER Y | |
69.Hang 30 | Bo Trach | 693.00 | 55 | 0632800 192770 | 2006 | 600 | PN |
70. Hang Rua | Bo Trach | 440.00 | 92 | 0635628 1932153 | 2006 | PN | |
71.Hang Hong | Bo Trach | 717.00 | 54 | 0640400 192730 | 2006 | 205 | PN |
72. Cave Palace | Bo Trach | 488.00 | 11 | 0628081 1924568 | 2006 | V | |
73. Hang Set Danh | Bo Trach | 178.00 | 15 | 0627300 192640 | 2006 | V | |
74. Bamboo Cave | Bo Trach | 63 | 40 | 063670 193610 | 2007 | PN | |
75. Hang De | Bo Trach | 20.00 | 10 | 063940 194710 | 2006 | PN |
76. Hang Doi K.30
Bo Trach | 136.00 | 31 | 063290 192780 | 2006 | 440 | PN | |
77.Vu Ca Tau Cave | Bo Trach | 370.00 | 21 | 0639600 1927600 | 2006 | 220 | PN |
78. Dung Water Cave | Bo Trach | 450 | 40 | 0627219 1979620 | 2006 | V | |
79.Ho Nui Cave | Bo Trach | 323 | 59 | 0637239 1927188 | 2007 | 540 | PN |
80.Hang 11 | Bo Trach | 262 | 30 | 0636619 1939461 | 2007 | 100 | PN |
81.Tron Cave | Bo Trach | 1251 | 73 | 0634421 1933475 | 2007 | 160 | PN |
82.Moi Chin Cave | Bo Trach | 22 | 20 | 0637239 1927188 | 2007 | FATHER Y | |
83.Hang Hung Toc 2 | Bo Trach | 20 | 15 | 0634300 193870 | 2007 | 120 | PN |
84.Nightmare Cave | Bo Trach | 782.00 | 149 | 0634000 1934000 | 2007 | 260 | PN |
85.Vuc Tang Cave | Bo Trach | 1310 | 325 | 0630405 1933437 | ##### | V | |
86.Bamboo Cave | Bo Trach | 275.00 | 19 | 0632500 1939950 | 2006 | 320 | PN |
87.Hang Long | Bo Trach | 190.00 | 10 | 0638900 192830 | 2006 | 220 | PN |
88. Phong Cave | Bo Trach | 180.00 | 15 | no gps | 2006 | PN | |
89.Toan Cave | Bo Trach | 150.00 | 5 | 0626800 193280 | 2006 | V | |
90. Hang Du | Bo Trach | 763.00 | 256 | 0628919 1932200 | 2009/10 | V | |
91.Son Doong Cave | Bo Trach | 7678.00 | 449 | 0637258 1929750 | 2009/10 | 212 | PN |
92.Flower Cave | Bo Trach | 100+ | 15+ | 0635241 1933188 | 2009 | 450 | PN |
93. Nitrogen 2
Bo Trach | 265.00 | 19 | 0638947 1930788 | 2009 | 500 | PN | |
94. Hang Nghia | Bo Trach | 276.00 | 4 | 0638685 1928096 | 2009 | 200 | PN |
95. Hang Sot | Bo Trach | 271.00 | 7 | 0633614 1938768 | 2009 | ||
96.Resergence | Bo Trach | 50.00 | -34 | 0632800 1943100 | 2009 | FATHER Y | |
98. Hang Khi 2 | Bo Trach | 268.00 | 52 | 0627640 1934712 | 2009 | V | |
99.Unnamed Shaft | Bo Trach | o | 40+ | 0627860 1932881 | 2009 | V | |
100.Caves 26 | Bo Trach | 46.00 | 11 | 0630998 1929205 | 2009 | V | |
101. Cave 14 | Bo Trach | 327.00 | 52 | 0635534 1939321 | 2009/10 | PN | |
102. Hang Gio | Bo Trach | 549.00 | 0629538 1941315 | 2009 | FATHER Y | ||
103.Coal Cave | Bo Trach | 200.00 | 5 | 0629600 1940200 | 2009 | FATHER Y | |
104.Lau Cave | Bo Trach | 1542.00 | -354 | 0627753 1941711 | 2009/10 | FATHER Y | |
105. Hang Lai | Bo Trach | 102.00 | 51 | 0627682 1941720 | 2010 | FATHER Y | |
106. Noi Bu Cave | Bo Trach | 660.00 | 165 | 0626881 1945563 | 2010 | FATHER Y | |
107.Billy Cave | Bo Trach | 142.00 | 10 | 0625622 1929771 | 2010 | V | |
108. Warehouse | Bo Trach | 86.00 | 10 | 0625558 1929788 | 2010 | V | |
109.Hang 1987 | Bo Trach | 916.00 | 75 | 0636929 1927311 | 2010 | 550 | PN |
110.Hang 1989 | Bo Trach | 693.00 | 59 | 0636698 1927141 | 2010 | 535 | PN |
111.Hang 1990
Bo Trach | 206.00 | 61 | 0636664 1925198 | 2010 | 540 | PN | |
112.Hang 30 shaft | Bo Trach | 35.00 | 80 | no gps | 2010 | PN | |
113. Loong Con Cave | Bo Trach | 210.00 | 97 | 0637300 1931459 | 2010 | 400 | PN |
114.Throung Cave | Bo Trach | 38.00 | 0 | 0620862 1939635 | 2010 | FATHER Y | |
115.Throung Cave 2 | Bo Trach | 95.00 | 5 | 0621355 1939199 | 2010 | FATHER Y | |
116.Vuc Nuyen1 | Bo Trach | 17.00 | 17 | 0620782 1938425 | 2010 | FATHER Y | |
117. Vu Nuyen 2 | Bo Trach | 20.00 | 20 | 0620850 1938481 | 2010 | FATHER Y | |
118.Vuc 5 minutes | Bo Trach | 0.00 | 0 | 0620663 1938777 | 2010 | FATHER Y | |
119. Hang Trung 2 | Bo Trach | 59.00 | 5 | 0621179 1938427 | 2010 | FATHER Y | |
120.Vuc Snaplet | Bo Trach | 70.00 | 80 | 0620740 1938440 | 2010 | FATHER Y | |
121.Ngai Tree | Bo Trach | 70.00 | 5 | 0635317 1943840 | 2006 | 40 | PN |
122.Water Cave | Bo Trach | 15.00 | 3 | 0635759 1943980 | 2006 | 40 | PN |
123. Long Bee Cave | Bo Trach | 40.00 | 5 | 0635064 1943889 | 2006 | 40 | PN |
124. Hang Khi 3 | Bo Trach | 278.00 | 12 | 0625531 193008 | 2010 | 231 | V |
125. Salut Cave | Bo Trach | 40.00 | 5 | 0633948 194327 | 2006 | PN | |
126.Toan Cave | Bo Trach | 166.00 | 11 | 0626800 193280 | 2006 | V | |
127.Small Alcove | Bo Trach | 50.00 | 0 | 0627953 193297 | 2006 | V |
128.Sung Sot Cave
Bo Trach | 103.00 | 38 | no gps | 2006 | PN |
Total Stock
Wind
PN Nha Phong Nha system 70,374 km
System volume 40,490
118,945 V Vom
Vegetarian Vegetarian
km
Run system 7,057 km
Appendix 4.2: Potential cave systems in the National Park
TT
Cave name | Commune/district | Survey year | Length surveyed | Height (m) | |
I | Phong Nha Cave System | 50776 | |||
1 | Phong Nha Cave | Son Trach | 1992 | 7729 | 83 |
2 | Dark Cave | Son Trach | 1992 | 5258 | 80 |
3 | Hang E | Thuong Trach | 1994 | 845 | - |
4 | Cha Ang Cave | Thuong Trach | 1992 | 667 | 15 |
5 | Hang Thung | Thuong Trach | 1994 | 3351 | 133 |
6 | Swallow Cave | Thuong Trach | 1994,1997 | 2490 | 49 |
7 | Khe Tien Cave | Thuong Trach | 1994 | 520 | -15 |
8 | Khe Ry Cave | Thuong Trach | 1997,1999 | 18902 | 120(+58-62) |
9 | Khe Thi Cave | Thuong Trach | 1994 | 35 | -20 |
10 | Phong Nha dry cave | Thuong Trach | 1994 | 981 | - |
11 | Cold Cave | Thuong Trach | 2001,2005 | 4718 | -101.9 |
12 | Bat Cave | Thuong Trach | 2001 | 539 | 17.3 |
13 | Button Cave | Thuong Trach | 2003 | 2205 | - |
14 | Double Cave | Thuong Trach | 2003 | 1124 | |
15 | Hang Ca | Thuong Trach | 2001 | 361 | - |
16 | Nghiền Tree Cave | Thuong Trach | 2005 | 162 | -52.5 |
17 | Lau Cave | Thuong Trach | 2005 | 481 | 22.3 |
18 | New Cave | Thuong Trach | 2005 | 408.2 | -21.2 |
Vault Cave System | 36063 | ||||
19 | Arch Cave | Thuong Trach | 1994 | 15870 | 145 |
20 | Cave of the Great Proclamation | Thuong Trach | 1994 | 1645 | 28 |
21 | Duat Cave | Thuong Trach | 1994 | 3927 | 45 |
22 | Lair | Thuong Trach | 1994 | 1500 | 60 |
23 | Tiger Cave | Thuong Trach | 1997 | 1616 | 46 |
24 | Hang Over | Thuong Trach | 1997 | 3244 | 103(+93-10) |
25 | Pyging Cave | Thuong Trach | 1992 | 845 | -94 |
26 | Ruc Caroong Cave | Thuong Trach | 1992 | 2800 | 45 |
27 | Klung Cave | Thuong Trach | 2005 | 1086 | -73.3 |
28 | Kling Cave | Thuong Trach | 2005 | 120 | -14.7 |
29 | A Cu Cave | Thuong Trach | 2005 | 650 | 42.1 (22.7-19.3) |
30 | Mother and Child Cave | Thuong Trach | 2005 | 733 | -49.1 |
31 | Hang Duc | Thuong Trach | 2005 | 1335 | 4.6 |
32 | Hang Hoi | Thuong Trach | 2005 | 188 | 5.9 |
33 | White Rock Cave | Thuong Trach | 2005 | 270 | -37.6 |
34 | Bin Dam Cave | Thuong Trach | 2005 | 64.4 | -0.7 |
35 | Bat Cave | Thuong Trach | 2005 | 86.4 | 17.3 |
36 | Water Cave | Thuong Trach | 2005 | 83 | -17.8 |
37 | Paradise Cave | Good luck | 2008 | 31 | -45 |
Source: British Cave Research Association (1992 to 2005 - updated by author)