The impact method shows that although the skill of the control group students increased in score, it was not significant (still at average level - level 3) and there was no change in the skill level after the experiment of the experimental group. The T-test gave the result p = 0.042 <0.05, showing a significant difference between the experimental group and the control group after the experiment. This proves the effectiveness of the impact measures on the skills of the students of the Tourism major.
* Changes in event organization skill levels of students in the experimental group and the control group after the impact experiment:
Comparing the post-experimental results of the experimental group on event organization skills, we obtained the data shown in table 3.27:
Table 3.27: Results of event organization skills measurement after the experiment of the experimental group and the control group
TT
Event planning skills | Experimental group | Control group | |||||||
Before reality test | After practice test | Before reality test | After practice test | ||||||
Average | Level | Phone B | Level | Average | Level degree | Average | Level | ||
1 | Special research skills KDL's psychology, needs and ideas | 2.96 | Level 3 | 4.10 | Level 4 | 3.00 | Level 3 | 3.41 | Level 3 |
2 | Idea generation skills Organize events according to the needs of the tourist area | 2.83 | Level 2 | 3.93 | Level 3 | 2.89 | Level 3 | 3.25 | Level 3 |
3 | Planning skills according to your wishes event organizer idea | 3.17 | Level 3 | 4.29 | Level 4 | 2.95 | Level 3 | 3.72 | Level 3 |
4 | Operations management skills during the event | 2.79 | Level 3 | 3.77 | Level 3 | 3.01 | Level 3 | 3.34 | Level 3 |
5 | Summary and evaluation skills event organization process | 3.28 | Level 3 | 4.32 | Level 4 | 3.04 | Level 3 | 3.64 | Level 3 |
Shared: | 3.01 | Level 3 | 4.08 | Level 4 | 2.98 | Level 3 | 3.47 | Level 3 | |
Maybe you are interested!
-
Practical Research Results on Event Organization Skills of Tourism Students -
Comparing Event Organization Skills of Tourism Students by Grade Level -
Comparison of the Organization of the 2013 National Tourism Year Event in Hai Phong with Some Other Provinces and Cities That Previously Hosted the National Tourism Year -
Solutions for tourism development in Tien Lang - 10
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism, tourism development
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
- District People's Committees and authorities of communes with tourist attractions should support, promote, and provide necessary information to people, helping them improve their knowledge about tourism. Raise tourism awareness for local people.
*
* *
Due to limited knowledge and research time, the thesis inevitably has shortcomings. Therefore, I look forward to receiving guidance from teachers, experts as well as your comments to make the thesis more complete.
Chapter III Conclusion
Through the issues presented in Chapter II, we can come to some conclusions:
Based on the strengths of available tourism resources, the types of tourism in Tien Lang that need to be promoted in the coming time are sightseeing and resort tourism, discovery tourism, weekend tourism. To improve the quality and diversify tourism products, Tien Lang district needs to combine with local cultural tourism resources, at the same time combine with surrounding areas, build rich tourism products. The strengths of Tien Lang tourism are eco-tourism and cultural tourism, so developing Tien Lang tourism must always go hand in hand with restoring and preserving types of cultural tourism resources. Some necessary measures to support and improve the efficiency of exploiting tourism resources in Tien Lang are: strengthening the construction of technical facilities and labor force serving tourism, actively promoting and advertising tourism, and expanding forms of capital mobilization for tourism development.
CONCLUDE
I Conclusion
1. Based on the results achieved within the framework of the thesis's needs, some basic conclusions can be drawn as follows:
Tien Lang is a locality with great potential for tourism development. The relatively abundant cultural tourism resources and ecological tourism resources have great appeal to tourists. Based on this potential, Tien Lang can build a unique tourism industry that is competitive enough with other localities within Hai Phong city and neighboring areas.
In recent years, the exploitation of the advantages of resources to develop tourism and build tourist routes in Tien Lang has not been commensurate with the available potential. In terms of quantity, many resource objects have not been brought into the purpose of tourism development. In terms of time, the regular service time has not been extended to attract more visitors. Infrastructure and technical facilities are still weak. The labor force is still thin and weak in terms of expertise. Tourism programs and routes have not been organized properly, the exploitation content is still monotonous, so it has not attracted many visitors. Although resources have not been mobilized much for tourism development, they are facing the risk of destruction and degradation.
2. Based on the results of investigation, analysis, synthesis, evaluation and selective absorption of research results of related topics, the thesis has proposed a number of necessary solutions to improve the efficiency of exploiting tourism resources in Tien Lang such as: promoting the restoration and conservation of tourism resources, focusing on investment and key exploitation of ecotourism resources, strengthening the construction of infrastructure and tourism workforce. Expanding forms of capital mobilization. In addition, the thesis has built a number of tourist routes of Hai Phong in which Tien Lang tourism resources play an important role.
Exploiting Tien Lang tourism resources for tourism development is currently facing many difficulties. The above measures, if applied synchronously, will likely bring new prospects for the local tourism industry, contributing to making Tien Lang tourism an important economic sector in the district's economic structure.
REFERENCES
1. Nhuan Ha, Trinh Minh Hien, Tran Phuong, Hai Phong - Historical and cultural relics, Hai Phong Publishing House, 1993
2. Hai Phong City History Council, Hai Phong Gazetteer, Hai Phong Publishing House, 1990.
3. Hai Phong City History Council, History of Tien Lang District Party Committee, Hai Phong Publishing House, 1990.
4. Hai Phong City History Council, University of Social Sciences and Humanities, VNU, Hai Phong Place Names Encyclopedia, Hai Phong Publishing House. 2001.
5. Law on Cultural Heritage and documents guiding its implementation, National Political Publishing House, Hanoi, 2003.
6. Tran Duc Thanh, Lecture on Tourism Geography, Faculty of Tourism, University of Social Sciences and Humanities, VNU, 2006
7. Hai Phong Center for Social Sciences and Humanities, Some typical cultural heritages of Hai Phong, Hai Phong Publishing House, 2001
8. Nguyen Ngoc Thao (editor-in-chief, Tourism Geography, Hai Phong Publishing House, two volumes (2001-2002)
9. Nguyen Minh Tue and group of authors, Hai Phong Tourism Geography, Ho Chi Minh City Publishing House, 1997.
10. Nguyen Thanh Son, Hai Phong Tourism Territory Organization, Associate Doctoral Thesis in Geological Geography, Hanoi, 1996.
11. Decision No. 2033/QD – UB on detailed planning of Tien Lang town, Hai Phong city until 2020.
12. Department of Culture, Information, Hai Phong Museum, Hai Phong relics
- National ranked scenic spot, Hai Phong Publishing House, 2005. 13. Tien Lang District People's Committee, Economic Development Planning -
Culture - Society of Tien Lang district to 2010.
14.Website www.HaiPhong.gov.vn
APPENDIX 1
List of national ranked monuments
STT
Name of the monument
Number, year of decisiondetermine
Location
1
Gam Temple
938 VH/QĐ04/08/1992
Cam Khe Village- Toan Thang commune
2
Doc Hau Temple
9381 VH/QĐ04/08/1992
Doc Hau Village –Toan Thang commune
3
Cuu Doi Communal House
3207 VH/QĐDecember 30, 1991
Zone II of townTien Lang
4
Ha Dai Temple
938 VH/QĐ04/08/1992
Ha Dai Village –Tien Thanh commune
APPENDIX II
STT
Name of the monument
Number, year of decision
Location
1
Phu Ke Pagoda Temple
178/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Zone 1 - townTien Lang
2
Trung Lang Temple
178/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Zone 4 – townTien Lang
3
Bao Khanh Pagoda
1900/QD-UBAugust 24, 2006
Nam Tu Village -Kien Thiet commune
4
Bach Da Pagoda
1792/QD-UB11/11/2002
Hung Thang Commune
5
Ngoc Dong Temple
177/QD-UBNovember 27, 2005
Tien Thanh Commune
6
Tomb of Minister TSNhu Van Lan
2848/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2003
Nam Tu Village -Kien Thiet commune
7
Canh Son Stone Temple
2160/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2003
Van Doi Commune –Doan Lap
8
Meiji Temple
2259/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2002
Toan Thang Commune
9
Tien Doi Noi Temple
477/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2005
Doan Lap Commune
10
Tu Doi Temple
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Doan Lap Commune
11
Duyen Lao Temple
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Tien Minh Commune
12
Dinh Xuan Uc Pagoda
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Bac Hung Commune
13
Chu Khe Pagoda
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Hung Thang Commune
14
Dong Dinh
2848/QD-UBNovember 21, 2002
Vinh Quang Commune
15
President's Memorial HouseTon Duc Thang
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
NT Quy Cao
Ha Dai Temple
Ben Vua Temple
Tien Lang hot spring
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 16pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 6pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 12pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
Identify Rating Levels and Rating Scales
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism,quan lan,quang ninh,ecology,ecotourism,minh chau,van don,geography,geographical basis,tourism development,science
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
of the islanders. Therefore, this indicator will be divided into two sub-indicators:
a1. Natural tourism attractiveness a2. Cultural tourism attractiveness
b. Tourist capacity
The two island communes in Quan Lan have different capacities to receive tourists. Minh Chau Commune is home to many standard hotels and resorts, attracting high-income domestic and international tourists. Meanwhile, Quan Lan Commune has many motels mainly built and operated by local people, so the scale and quality are not high, and will be suitable for ordinary tourists such as students.
c. Time of exploitation of Quan Lan Island Commune:
Quan Lan tourism is seasonal due to weather and climate conditions and festivals only take place on certain days of the year, specifically in spring. In Quan Lan commune, the period from April to June and from September to November is considered the best time to visit Quan Lan because the cultural tourism activities are mainly associated with festivals taking place during this time.
Minh Chau island commune:
Tourism exploitation time is all year round, because this is a place with a number of tourist attractions with diverse ecosystems such as Bai Tu Long National Park Research Center, Tram forest, Turtle Laying Beach, so besides coming to the beach for tourism and vacation in the summer, Minh Chau will attract research groups to come for tourism combined with research at other times of the year.
d. Sustainability
The sustainability of ecotourism sites in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes depends on the sensitivity of the ecosystems to climate changes.
landscape. In general, these tourist destinations have a fairly high level of sustainability, because they are natural ecosystems, planned and protected. However, if a large number of tourists gather at certain times, it can exceed the carrying capacity and affect the sustainability of the environment (polluted beaches, damaged trees, animals moving away from their habitats, etc.), then the sustainability of the above ecosystems (natural ecosystems, human ecosystems) will also be affected and become less sustainable.
e. Location and accessibility
Both island communes have ports to take tourists to visit from Van Don wharf:
- Quan Lan – Van Don traffic route:
Phuc Thinh – Viet Anh high-speed boat and Quang Minh high-speed boat, depart at 8am and 2pm from Van Don to Quan Lan, and at 7am and 1pm from Quan Lan to Van Don. There are also wooden boats departing at 7am and 1pm.
- Van Don - Minh Chau traffic route:
Chung Huong high-speed train, Minh Chau train, morning 7:30 and afternoon 13:30 from Van Don to Minh Chau, morning 6:30 and afternoon 13:00 from Minh Chau to Van Don.
f. Infrastructure
Despite receiving investment attention, the issue of infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism on Quan Lan Island is still an issue that needs to be resolved because it has a direct impact on the implementation of ecotourism activities. The minimum conditions for serving tourists such as accommodation, electricity, water, communication, especially medical services, and security work need to be given top priority. Ecotourism spots in Minh Chau commune are assessed to have better infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism because there are quite complete and synchronous conditions for serving tourists, meeting many needs of domestic and foreign tourists.
3.2.1.4. Determine assessment levels and assessment scales
Corresponding to the levels of each criterion, the index is the score of those levels in the order of 4, 3, 2, 1 decreasing according to the standard of each level: very attractive (4), attractive (3), average (2), less attractive (1).
3.2.1.5. Determining the coefficients of the criteria
For the assessment of DLST in the two communes of Quan Lan and Minh Chau islands, the students added evaluation coefficients to show the importance of the criteria and indicators as follows:
Coefficient 3 with criteria: Attractiveness, Exploitation time. These are the 2 most important criteria for attracting tourists to tourism in general and eco-tourism in particular, so they have the highest coefficient.
Coefficient 2 with criteria: Capacity, Infrastructure, Location and accessibility . Because the assessment area is an island commune of Van Don district, the above criteria are selected by the author with appropriate coefficients at the average level.
Coefficient 1 with criteria: Sustainability. Quan Lan has natural and human-made ecotourism sites, with high biodiversity and little impact from local human factors. Most of the ecotourism sites are still wild, so they are highly sustainable.
3.2.1.6. Results of DLST assessment on Quan Lan island
a. Assessment of the potential for natural tourism development
For Minh Chau commune:
+ Natural tourism attractiveness is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined as average (2 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of Capacity criterion is 2 x 2 = 4.
+ Exploitation time is long (4 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Exploitation time criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is assessed as good (3 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 3 x 2 = 6 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Minh Chau commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 4 + 12 + 4 + 4 + 6 = 42 points
Similar assessment for Quan Lan commune, we have the following table:
Table 3.3: Assessment of the potential for natural ecotourism development in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of self-tourismof course
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
CommuneMinh Chau
12
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
42/52
Quan CommuneLan
6
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
33/52
b. Assessment of the potential for humanistic tourism development
For Quan Lan commune:
+ The attractiveness of human tourism is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined to be large (3 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Capacity criterion is 3 x 2 = 6.
+ Mining time is average (3 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Mining time criterion is 3 x 3 = 9.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points.
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is rated as average (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Quan Lan commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 6 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 4 = 36 points.
Similar assessment with Minh Chau commune we have the following table:
Table 3.4: Assessment of the potential for developing humanistic eco-tourism in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of human tourismliterature
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Quan CommuneLan
12
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
39/52
Minh CommuneChau
6
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
36/52
Basically, both Minh Chau and Quan Lan localities have quite favorable conditions for developing ecotourism. However, Quan Lan commune has more advantages to develop ecotourism in a humanistic direction, because this is an area with many famous historical relics such as Quan Lan Communal House, Quan Lan Pagoda, Temple worshiping the hero Tran Khanh Du, ... along with local festivals held annually such as the wind praying ceremony (March 15), Quan Lan festival (June 10-19); due to its location near the port and long exploitation time, the beaches in Quan Lan commune (especially Quan Lan beach) are no longer hygienic and clean to ensure the needs of tourists coming to relax and swim; this is also an area with many beautiful landscapes such as Got Beo wind pass, Ong Phong head, Voi Voi cave, but the ability to access these places is still very limited (dirt hill road, lots of gravel and rocks), especially during rainy and windy times; In addition, other natural resources such as mangrove forests and sea worms have not been really exploited for tourism purposes and ecotourism development. On the contrary, Minh Chau commune has more advantages in developing ecotourism in the direction of natural tourism, this is an area with diverse ecosystems such as at Rua De Beach, Bai Tu Long National Park Conservation Center...; Minh Chau beach is highly appreciated for its natural beauty and cleanliness, ranked in the top ten most beautiful beaches in Vietnam; Minh Chau commune is also home to Tram forest with a large area and a purity of up to 90%, suitable for building bridges through the forest (a very effective type of natural ecotourism currently applied by many countries) for tourists to sightsee, as well as for the purpose of studying and researching.
Figure 3.1: Thenmala Forest Bridge (India) Source: https://www.thenmalaecotourism.com/(August 21, 2019)
3.2.2. Using SWOT matrix to evaluate Quan Lan island tourism
General assessment of current tourism activities of Quan Lan island is shown through the following SWOT matrix:
Table 3.5: SWOT matrix evaluating tourism activities on Quan Lan island
Internal agent
Strengths- There is a lot of potential for tourism development, especially natural ecotourism and humanistic ecotourism.- The unskilled labor force is relatively abundant.- resource environmentunpolluted, still
Weaknesses- Poorly developed infrastructure, especially traffic routes to tourist destinations on the island.- The team of professional staff is still weak.- Tourism products in general
quite wild, originalintact
general and DLST in particularalone is monotonous.
External agents
Opportunity- Tourism is a key industry in the socio-economic development strategy of the province and Van Don economic zone.- Quan Lan was selected as a pilot area for eco-tourism development within the framework of the green growth project between Quang Ninh province and the Japanese organization JICA.- The flow of tourists and especially ecotourism in the world tends toincreasing
Challenge- Weather and climate change abnormally.- Competition in tourism products is increasingly fierce, especially with other localities in the province such as Ha Long, Mong Cai...- Awareness of tourists, especially domestic tourists, about ecotourism and nature conservation is not high.
Through summary analysis using SWOT matrix we see that:
To exploit strengths and take advantage of opportunities, it is necessary to:
- Diversify products and service types (build more tourism routes aimed at specific needs of tourists: experiential tourism immersed in nature, spiritual cultural tourism...)
- Effective exploitation of resources and differentiated products (natural resources and human resources)
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: #0D0D0D; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -3pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Symbol, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:Wingdings; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:Cambria, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: #212121; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex

The results of Table 3.27 show that the event organization skills of the experimental group after the experiment were much higher than before the experiment in terms of both average score and level. After the experiment, the event organization skills of the experimental group increased from level 3 (Average = 3.01) to level 4 (Average = 4.08), including some skills that achieved high scores in level 4 such as planning skills according to event organization ideas (Average = 4.29) or the group of skills summarizing and evaluating the event organization process (Average = 4.32). The change in both scores and levels due to the impact of the impact measure through T-test gave the result p = 0.043 <0.05, showing a significant difference in the level of event organization skills of the experimental group before and after the experiment. The levels and scores of the control group had an increase in event organization skill scores but still only reached level 3: Few errors, relatively proficient, relatively flexible (before the experiment, the average score = 2.98; after the experiment, the average score = 3.47). The test results confirmed the difference in the skill levels of the experimental group before and after the experiment and were consistent with the results of the impact experiment. The skill levels of the experimental group were higher than the control group in both scores and levels. While the skills of the experimental group increased to level 4 (Almost no errors, quite proficient, quite flexible), all skills in the control group remained at level 3 (Few errors, relatively proficient, relatively flexible). After the experiment, there was an increase in the control group's scores in the levels of the skill groups but there was absolutely no increase in the levels of those skill groups (before and after the experiment, they were still at level 3). This result is consistent with the results of the current situation research and the results of the impact experiment. Through the analysis of the results and testing, it is shown that the impact measures for the experimental group produced higher results than the control group in both scores and levels. Thereby, it can be seen that the learning and training results of students' event organization skills have been improved. From there, it can be affirmed that the effectiveness of the impact measures used has practical significance for the process of forming and developing event organization skills for students in the Tourism industry.
3.3.3. Evaluation of experimental impact results
Through the analysis of the experimental results, we found the following problems:
During a period of one school year, with the level of the skill group Researching psychological characteristics, needs and ideas for organizing events of KDL being relatively similar, in the same learning environment, but in the control group, the level of the skill groups of students increased in terms of average scores and not much, the point of interest is that there was no growth to higher levels (still reaching level 3: Few errors, relatively proficient, relatively flexible). Meanwhile, there was an increase in both the average score and the level of the component skill groups of the event organization skills of the experimental group (level 4). This helps us conclude that the improvement in skills of the experimental group was due to the influence of the impact measures.
Thus, the impact measures have brought about stable results, the impact experiment and the verification experiment were conducted the same both times, but the result was that the skill level of the experimental group of students increased. This result confirmed the experimental hypothesis: training event organization skills on the basis of enhancing knowledge about KDL psychology and ways to understand the needs and ideas of KDL event organization, systematizing event organization knowledge, training students' confidence and self-affirmation in the teaching process will contribute to improving students' event organization skills. Thus, the experimental measures are consistent with the research purpose and scientific hypothesis of the Thesis.
CHAPTER 3 SUMMARY
Event organization skills include 5 groups of component skills formed during the process of learning about event organization of students. The event organization skills of students achieved at level 3/5 of skill assessment level (few errors, relatively proficient, relatively flexible) and at level 2/5 of skill assessment level (many errors, less proficient, less flexible). In the hierarchy of 5 components of event organization skills, the skills are ranked from high to low including the skills: Organizing and managing activities during the event; Developing event organization ideas according to the needs of the tourist area; Summarizing and evaluating the event organization process; Planning according to event organization ideas and Researching the psychological characteristics, needs and ideas of the tourist area. In which, there is no difference in the level of event organization skills in terms of scores between men and women, between students with different academic results, but there is a difference between groups of students in the 2nd, 3rd and 4th year. The groups of event organization skills have a very close positive relationship. The group of skills studying the psychological characteristics, needs and ideas of KDL plays an important role, affecting the formation and development of other skills but has only achieved lower results than the majority of the remaining component skills.
It is necessary to pay more attention to the teaching methods of lecturers and experts, to enhance the provision of event organization knowledge during the training process to help students grasp the basic knowledge, the premise for event organization activities, especially the need to train the ability of autonomy, the confidence of each student in practical learning. Students' awareness of the impact of subjective and objective factors on the formation and development of event organization skills is not correct. This is one of the reasons affecting the level of achievement of event organization skills of students. Students do not really grasp the purpose, meaning as well as see the importance and passion for event organization activities, only consider this as a subject. Most of the learning activities of students need the guidance and support of lecturers to achieve
desired results. There has been proficiency in individual operations and there has been an initial reasonable combination of operations under stable conditions. The factor of students' event organization knowledge is assessed to have the greatest influence on students' event organization skills. Among the measures affecting the formation of students' event organization skills, the measure of training students' self-control and self-confidence is assessed to have the greatest influence.
The experimental results confirmed: The level of event organization skills increased strongly in both index and level under the influence of the impact measures. Thus, in addition to creating conditions for students to learn effectively with equipment and practice, applying the assessment process in learning, it is necessary to pay more attention to teaching measures to enhance students' awareness of the meaning and knowledge and communication in learning event organization.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Conclusion
From the results of theoretical and practical research on event organization skills of tourism students, we can draw the following conclusions:
1.1. Event organization skills of tourism students are complex skills consisting of 5 component skill groups: Researching ideas, needs and conditions of tourist areas; Developing event organization ideas according to the needs of tourist areas; Planning according to event organization ideas; Organizing and managing activities during the event; Summarizing and evaluating. This skill of students is influenced by many subjective and objective factors and is affected by a number of measures during the training process. Simply guiding tours will bring boredom and negatively affect the tourism industry while reducing job opportunities for students after graduation.
1.2. Through research on the current situation, it is shown that the event organization skills of tourism students are at an average level. When participating in event organization activities, most students have performed the basic operations relatively completely, but not correctly and the effectiveness is still limited, not paying due attention to some necessary skills. The groups of event organization skills have a very close positive relationship. The group of skills Researching psychological characteristics, needs, and ideas of tourism plays an important role, affecting the formation and development of other skills but only achieves the lowest skill level compared to the remaining component skill groups. There is no difference in event organization skills of male and female students, but there are differences in issues such as: learning outcomes, between the 2nd, 3rd and 4th years and event organization experience.
1.3. There are many factors that affect the event organization skills of tourism students, in which the event organization knowledge of students has the most important influence. In addition, it is necessary to use measures to influence the formation of students' event organization skills such as training and raising awareness of learning activities.
Organizing events such as enhancing knowledge of tourism psychology, as well as knowledge of how to organize events, enhancing communication skills, and interactive activities for students.
1.4. Event organization skills of tourism students have certain changes according to the learning process, but it is only an increase in scores due to the impact of the teaching process, but there is no clear increase in the level of skills. The experimental results are consistent with the experimental hypothesis: impacting the teaching process to help students have a way to learn about the personality traits of the tourism industry, determining the needs and ideas of organizing tourism events, organizing students to plan events in relation to the ideas of organizing events, organizing teaching so that students have a full and systematic awareness of event organization can contribute to improving students' event organization skills. The above research results are consistent with the hypothesis and the tasks of the topic have been solved.
2. Recommendations
2.1. For the School: Event organization skills of students majoring in Tourism are still limited. Therefore, to contribute to improving event organization skills for students, we recommend that the school should apply the following measures: Pay attention to training and fostering the teaching staff in terms of professional qualifications and teaching methods, creating conditions for them to access modern teaching methods, applying types of testing and evaluation in event organization training. Develop a training program on event organization skills for students in vivid, attractive, appropriate forms, with practical content and need to create conditions for students to practice event organization skills inside and outside the school. Create necessary physical conditions such as classrooms, teaching equipment, and actual study time.
2.2. For the faculty of specialized training in event organization: Event organization skills play a very important role in the Tour Guide activities of Tourism students. Therefore, there is a need for more in-depth and extensive research on organization skills.
student events to propose measures to further improve student event organization skills.
2.3. For lecturers teaching event organization: Lecturers need to be proactive and self-conscious in improving their professional qualifications and skills; actively innovate teaching methods; need to pay attention to organizing all stages of event organization well; create attractive and practical situations to stimulate students' creative thinking; need to state clear goals and requirements to guide students' activities; provide specific instructions; pay attention, check, closely monitor, urge, remind, support, and create conditions for students to work seriously and effectively; evaluate closely, accurately, fairly, and objectively.
Help students understand the meaning of event organization so that they can actively, voluntarily, proactively and creatively participate in event organization activities. Members interact with lecturers and friends to maximize their abilities in the process of learning about event organization.
2.4. For students majoring in Tourism: Students need to be aware of the importance of learning event organization for their future careers. Always learn and update knowledge from many different sources of documents based on the learning instructions of lecturers. Participate in real-life event organization activities at different levels and forms to practice and improve their event organization skills. Organize group event organization practice to support, learn from each other and best develop their event organization skills.





