APPENDIX 6.
RESULTS OF TEACHING EXPERIMENT
Appendix 6: RESULTS OF EXPERIMENTAL PEDAGOGY ON NET 1
Table 6A. Test results of class 8A3 and 8A4, Cat Linh Secondary School - Hanoi (before impact)
Xi Score
Number of students achieving Xi score Previous lesson impact | % of students achieving Xi score | % of students scoring Xi or lower | ||||
TN | Address | TN | Address | TN | Address | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
4 | 2 | 4 | 4.9 | 10.3 | 4.9 | 10.3 |
5 | 6 | 3 | 14.6 | 7.7 | 19.5 | 17.9 |
6 | 11 | 13 | 26.8 | 33.3 | 46.3 | 51.3 |
7 | 7 | 9 | 17.1 | 23.1 | 63.4 | 74.4 |
8 | 7 | 5 | 17.1 | 12.8 | 80.5 | 87.2 |
9 | 7 | 4 | 17.1 | 10.3 | 97.6 | 97.4 |
10 | 1 | 1 | 2.4 | 2.6 | 100 | 100 |
41 | 39 | |||||
Maybe you are interested!
-
Organizing chemistry teaching according to an integrated approach to develop the ability to apply knowledge and skills for secondary school students - 27 -
Current Status of Teaching Chemistry in High Schools According to the Orientation of Developing Students' Capacity -
Organizing physical education teaching activities at People's Security College I in the current reform period - 14 -
Internship report at Vietnam Institute of Industrial Chemistry - 1 -
Organizing Capacity Training to Develop School Education Programs According to the New General Education Program for Management and Teaching Staff
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
TNSP GRADE 8 ROUND 1
33.3
26.8
23.1
17.1
17.1
12.8
17.1
14.6
10.3
10.3
7.7
4.9
2.4 2.6
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Point
Experimental Control
Percentage
Figure 6A1. Frequency chart showing the pre-impact test scores of the experimental class and the control class, grade 8, round 1, Cat Linh Secondary School (before the impact)
Table 6A2. Test results in classes 9A2 and 9A3
Nguyen Tat Thanh Secondary and High School – Hanoi (before impact)
Score
Xi
Number of students achieving Xi score Previous lesson impact | % of students achieving Xi score | % of students achieving Xi score back down | ||||
TN | Address | TN | Address | TN | Address | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
4 | 2 | 1 | 4.9 | 2.6 | 4.9 | 2.6 |
5 | 2 | 2 | 4.9 | 5.1 | 9.8 | 7.7 |
6 | 4 | 4 | 9.8 | 10.3 | 19.5 | 17.9 |
7 | 9 | 10 | 22.0 | 25.6 | 41.5 | 43.6 |
8 | 13 | 15 | 31.7 | 38.5 | 73.2 | 82.1 |
9 | 8 | 4 | 19.5 | 10.3 | 92.7 | 92.3 |
10 | 3 | 3 | 7.3 | 7.7 | 100 | 100 |
41 | 39 | |||||
TNSP GRADE 9 ROUND 1
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
38.5
31.7
25.6
22
19.5
9.8 10.3
10.3
4.9 4.9 5.1
2.6
7.3 7.7
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Point
Experimental Control
Percentage
Figure 6A2. Frequency chart showing the pre-test scores of the experimental class and the control class, grade 9, round 1, Nguyen Tat Thanh Secondary School.
(before impact)
Table 6A3. Test results of class 8A3 and 8A4, Cat Linh Secondary School - Hanoi (after impact)
Xi Score
Number of students achieving Xi score Previous lesson impact | % of students achieving Xi score | % of students scoring Xi or lower | ||||
TN | Address | TN | Address | TN | Address | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2.6 | 0 | 2.6 |
5 | 1 | 7 | 2.4 | 17.9 | 2.4 | 20.5 |
6 | 7 | 12 | 17.1 | 30.8 | 19.5 | 51.3 |
7 | 12 | 8 | 29.3 | 20.5 | 48.8 | 71.8 |
8 | 9 | 4 | 22.0 | 10.3 | 70.7 | 82.1 |
9 | 8 | 5 | 19.5 | 12.8 | 90.2 | 94.9 |
10 | 4 | 2 | 9.8 | 5.1 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
41 | 39 | |||||
TNSP GRADE 8 ROUND 1
35
30.8
30
29.3
25
22
20.5
20
17.9 17.1
19.5
15
10.3
12.8
9.8
10
5.1
5
2.6 2.4
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Point
10
Experimental Control
Percentage
Figure 6A3. Frequency chart showing the test scores of lesson 1 of the experimental class and the control class, grade 8, round 1
Table 6A4. Test results in classes 9A2 and 9A3
Nguyen Tat Thanh Secondary and High School – Hanoi (after impact)
Score
Xi
Number of students achieving Xi score Previous lesson impact | % of students achieving Xi score | % of students achieving Xi score back down | ||||
TN | Address | TN | Address | TN | Address | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2.6 | 0 | 2.6 |
5 | 1 | 3 | 2.4 | 7.7 | 2.4 | 10.3 |
6 | 2 | 4 | 4.9 | 10.3 | 7.3 | 20.5 |
7 | 8 | 9 | 19.5 | 23.1 | 26.8 | 43.6 |
8 | 13 | 16 | 31.7 | 41.0 | 58.5 | 84.6 |
9 | 11 | 4 | 26.8 | 10.3 | 85.4 | 94.9 |
10 | 6 | 2 | 14.6 | 5.1 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
41 | 39 | |||||
TNSP GRADE 9 ROUND 1
45
40
41
35
30
25
20
31.7
26.8
23.1
19.5
14.6
15
10
5
0
10.3
7.7 4.9
10.3
2.6
2.4
5.1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Point
Experimental Control
Percentage
Figure 6A4. Frequency chart showing the test scores of lesson 2 of the experimental class and the control class of grade 9, round 1
Appendix 6B: RESULTS OF EXPERIMENTAL PEDAGOGY ON NET 2
Table 6B1. Frequency distribution table, frequency, cumulative frequency of results of two 8th grade tests, round 2 (before impact)
Score
Xi
Number of students achieving Xi score Previous lesson impact | % of students achieving Xi score | % of students achieving Xi score back down | ||||
TN | Address | TN | Address | TN | Address | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 1.3 |
3 | 5 | 4 | 3.4 | 2.7 | 3.4 | 4.0 |
4 | 10 | 10 | 6.8 | 6.7 | 10.2 | 10.7 |
5 | 15 | 17 | 10.2 | 11.4 | 20.4 | 22.1 |
6 | 28 | 35 | 19.0 | 23.5 | 39.5 | 45.6 |
7 | 37 | 31 | 25.2 | 20.8 | 64.6 | 66.4 |
8 | 32 | 33 | 21.8 | 22.1 | 86.4 | 88.6 |
9 | 17 | 15 | 11.6 | 10.1 | 98.0 | 98.7 |
10 | 3 | 2 | 2.0 | 1.3 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
147 | 149 | |||||
TNSP GRADE 8 ROUND 2
30
25.2
25
23.5
21.8
20.8
22.1
20
19
15
11.4
10.2
10
11.6
10.1
6.8
6.7
5
3.4
1.3
2.7
2 1.3
0 0 0 0 0
0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Experimental Control
Figure 6B1. Frequency chart showing the pre-test scores of the experimental class and the control class, grade 8, round 2
Table 6B2. Summary table of characteristic parameters of experimental and control classes. Treatment with pre-test impact of grade 8 round 2
Class
Quantity | Average value | Standard deviation | Standard error | T-test | |
TN Class | 147 | 6.80 | 1,612 | ,133 | 0.345 |
DC Class | 149 | 6.62 | 1,638 | ,134 |
Independent Samples Test
Levene's Test for Equality of Variances | t-test for Equality of Means | ||||||||
F | Sig. | t | df | Sig. (2- tailed) | Mean Difference | Std. Error Difference | 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference | ||
Lower | Upper | ||||||||
Equal variances assumed TTD Equal variances not assumed | ,151 | ,698 | ,945 ,945 | 294 293,998 | ,345 ,345 | ,179 ,179 | ,189 ,189 | -,193 -,193 | ,550 ,550 |
Table 6B3. Frequency distribution table, frequency, cumulative frequency of results of two 9th grade tests, round 2 (before impact)
Xi Score
Number of students achieving Xi score Previous lesson impact | % of students achieving Xi score | % of students scoring Xi or lower | ||||
TN | Address | TN | Address | TN | Address | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
1 | 1 | 0 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.0 |
2 | 2 | 4 | 1.4 | 2.8 | 2.2 | 2.8 |
3 | 7 | 7 | 5.1 | 5.0 | 7.2 | 7.8 |
4 | 9 | 16 | 6.5 | 11.3 | 13.8 | 19.1 |
5 | 16 | 18 | 11.6 | 12.8 | 25.4 | 31.9 |
6 | 35 | 43 | 25.4 | 30.5 | 50.7 | 62.4 |
7 | 38 | 27 | 27.5 | 19.1 | 78.3 | 81.6 |
8 | 17 | 18 | 12.3 | 12.8 | 90.6 | 94.3 |
9 | 10 | 7 | 7.2 | 5.0 | 97.8 | 99.3 |
10 | 3 | 1 | 2.2 | 0.7 | 100 | 100 |
138 | 141 | 100.0 | 100.0 | |||
TNSP GRADE 9 ROUND 2
35
30.5
30
27.5
25.4
25
20
19.1
15
11.3
12.8
11.6
12.3 12.8
10
5.15
6.5
7.2
5
5
2.2
0 0
0.7 0
1.4
2.8
0.7
0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Experimental Control
Figure 6B2. Frequency chart showing test score results
before the impact of TN class and DC class grade 9 round 2
Table 6B4. Summary table of characteristic parameters of experimental and control classes. Treatment with pre-test impact of grade 9 round 2
Class
Quantity | Average value | Standard deviation | Standard error | T-test | |
TN Class | 138 | 6.33 | 1,710 | ,146 | ,107 |
DC Class | 141 | 6.01 | 1,663 | ,140 |
Independent Samples Test
Levene's Test for Equality of Variances | t-test for Equality of Means | ||||||||
F | Sig. | t | df | Sig. (2- tailed) | Mean Difference | Std. Error Difference | 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference | ||
Lower | Upper | ||||||||
Equal variances assumed TTD Equal variance not assumed | ,384 | ,536 | 1,616 1,615 | 277 276,316 | ,107 ,107 | ,326 ,326 | ,202 ,202 | -,071 -,071 | ,724 ,724 |
Table 6B5. Frequency distribution table, frequency, cumulative frequency of results of two 8th grade tests, round 2 (after impact)
Xi Score
Number of students achieving Xi score | % of students achieving Xi score | % of students scoring Xi or lower | ||||
TN | Address | TN | Address | TN | Address | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
2 | 0 | 3 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 |
3 | 3 | 11 | 2.0 | 7.4 | 2.0 | 9.4 |
4 | 7 | 14 | 4.8 | 9.4 | 6.8 | 18.8 |
5 | 18 | 32 | 12.2 | 21.5 | 19.0 | 40.3 |
6 | 24 | 45 | 16.3 | 30.2 | 35.4 | 70.5 |
7 | 39 | 22 | 26.5 | 14.8 | 61.9 | 85.3 |
8 | 34 | 14 | 23.1 | 9.4 | 85.0 | 94.7 |
9 | 17 | 7 | 11.6 | 4.7 | 96.6 | 99.4 |
10 | 5 | 1 | 3.4 | 0.7 | 100.0 | 100 |
147 | 149 | 100.0 | 100.0 | |||
TNSP GRADE 8 ROUND 2
35
30.2
30
26.5
25
23.1
21.5
20
16.3
14.8
15
10
12.2
9.4
11.6
9.4
5
2
2
4.7 3.4
0 0 0 0 0
0.7
0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Point
Experimental Control
7.4
4.8
Percentage
Figure 6B3. Frequency chart showing the test scores of the experimental class and the control class, grade 8, round 2 (after the impact)