Limitations in Law Enforcement on Tourism Resource Protection

The amount of environmental sanitation has cleaned the landscape and kept the tourist environment clean. For example, in Nghe An, some localities such as Vinh city, Cua Lo town, Dien Thanh (Dien Chau), Quynh Phuong (Quynh Luu), Kim Lien relic site (Nam Dan) ... have issued and implemented well regulations on environmental protection, built many models of mass participation in environmental protection in wards and communes, mobilized people not to dump garbage and waste on the streets and public places, established garbage collection teams in residential areas, and carried out well the general environmental sanitation work to ensure that no garbage is left on roads, residential areas, public areas and along the beach. 100% of tourist attractions in the province are equipped with trash bins and signs to raise tourists' awareness of environmental protection and strictly implement regulations of local authorities, and regularly clean tourist areas. In particular, in Vinh city and Cua Lo town, 100% of restaurants, hotels, and business kiosks carry out garbage collection at the collection point from 8:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m. every day. In other key tourist areas in the province, garbage collection teams have been established and environmental sanitation work has been carried out quite well (reaching 75-80%), with no garbage left on roads and tourist spots such as Kim Lien relic site, Hoang Thi Loan tomb relic site, Ho Chi Minh square, Quyet mountain center area, Cua Lo beach, Lu beach [36];...

Sixth, the cooperation between localities and private tourism businesses in the conservation and exploitation of heritage values ​​is a trend that has brought about many results and has been supported by the community in recent times. Quang Binh and Ninh Binh are two localities possessing many rare heritages and the cooperation between localities and private businesses is on the right track, achieving high efficiency in the protection of tourism resources. Mr. Nguyen Cao Tan, Deputy Director of the Management Board of Trang An Scenic Landscape ComplexAn affirmed:

The management board always determines the management of tourism activities.The calendar within the Trang An Scenic Landscape Complex is meaningful.important in preserving, embellishing and promoting the values ​​ofheritage. Therefore, close coordination with local authoritieslocalities and tourism businesses to ensure good activitiesTourism is a key task of the Management Board of the archipelago.Trang An scenic spot [39].

In this combination, the enterprise will be responsible for investment.infrastructure, full authority in organizing tourist routes, transporting visitorsThis means that businesses need to protect their resources well.tourism resources to bring tourists high quality tourism products.But besides that, the locality also has its own unit under the Committee.Provincial people directly supervise all infrastructure investment, construction and organization work.function, the line inside the heritage. This ensures that if any encroachment occursAny legacy from the business side will be detected and prevented promptly.

2.2.2 Limitations in law enforcement on tourism resource protection

Maybe you are interested!

• Solutions for tourism development in Tien Lang - 10 zt2i3t4l5ee zt2a3gstourism, tourism development zt2a3ge zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts - District People's Committees and authorities of communes with tourist attractions should support, promote, and provide necessary information to people, helping them improve their knowledge about tourism. Raise tourism awareness for local people. * * * Due to limited knowledge and research time, the thesis inevitably has shortcomings. Therefore, I look forward to receiving guidance from teachers, experts as well as your comments to make the thesis more complete. Chapter III Conclusion Through the issues presented in Chapter II, we can come to some conclusions: Based on the strengths of available tourism resources, the types of tourism in Tien Lang that need to be promoted in the coming time are sightseeing and resort tourism, discovery tourism, weekend tourism. To improve the quality and diversify tourism products, Tien Lang district needs to combine with local cultural tourism resources, at the same time combine with surrounding areas, build rich tourism products. The strengths of Tien Lang tourism are eco-tourism and cultural tourism, so developing Tien Lang tourism must always go hand in hand with restoring and preserving types of cultural tourism resources. Some necessary measures to support and improve the efficiency of exploiting tourism resources in Tien Lang are: strengthening the construction of technical facilities and labor force serving tourism, actively promoting and advertising tourism, and expanding forms of capital mobilization for tourism development. CONCLUDE I Conclusion 1. Based on the results achieved within the framework of the thesis's needs, some basic conclusions can be drawn as follows: Tien Lang is a locality with great potential for tourism development. The relatively abundant cultural tourism resources and ecological tourism resources have great appeal to tourists. Based on this potential, Tien Lang can build a unique tourism industry that is competitive enough with other localities within Hai Phong city and neighboring areas. In recent years, the exploitation of the advantages of resources to develop tourism and build tourist routes in Tien Lang has not been commensurate with the available potential. In terms of quantity, many resource objects have not been brought into the purpose of tourism development. In terms of time, the regular service time has not been extended to attract more visitors. Infrastructure and technical facilities are still weak. The labor force is still thin and weak in terms of expertise. Tourism programs and routes have not been organized properly, the exploitation content is still monotonous, so it has not attracted many visitors. Although resources have not been mobilized much for tourism development, they are facing the risk of destruction and degradation. 2. Based on the results of investigation, analysis, synthesis, evaluation and selective absorption of research results of related topics, the thesis has proposed a number of necessary solutions to improve the efficiency of exploiting tourism resources in Tien Lang such as: promoting the restoration and conservation of tourism resources, focusing on investment and key exploitation of ecotourism resources, strengthening the construction of infrastructure and tourism workforce. Expanding forms of capital mobilization. In addition, the thesis has built a number of tourist routes of Hai Phong in which Tien Lang tourism resources play an important role. Exploiting Tien Lang tourism resources for tourism development is currently facing many difficulties. The above measures, if applied synchronously, will likely bring new prospects for the local tourism industry, contributing to making Tien Lang tourism an important economic sector in the district's economic structure. REFERENCES 1. Nhuan Ha, Trinh Minh Hien, Tran Phuong, Hai Phong - Historical and cultural relics, Hai Phong Publishing House, 1993 2. Hai Phong City History Council, Hai Phong Gazetteer, Hai Phong Publishing House, 1990. 3. Hai Phong City History Council, History of Tien Lang District Party Committee, Hai Phong Publishing House, 1990. 4. Hai Phong City History Council, University of Social Sciences and Humanities, VNU, Hai Phong Place Names Encyclopedia, Hai Phong Publishing House. 2001. 5. Law on Cultural Heritage and documents guiding its implementation, National Political Publishing House, Hanoi, 2003. 6. Tran Duc Thanh, Lecture on Tourism Geography, Faculty of Tourism, University of Social Sciences and Humanities, VNU, 2006 7. Hai Phong Center for Social Sciences and Humanities, Some typical cultural heritages of Hai Phong, Hai Phong Publishing House, 2001 8. Nguyen Ngoc Thao (editor-in-chief, Tourism Geography, Hai Phong Publishing House, two volumes (2001-2002) 9. Nguyen Minh Tue and group of authors, Hai Phong Tourism Geography, Ho Chi Minh City Publishing House, 1997. 10. Nguyen Thanh Son, Hai Phong Tourism Territory Organization, Associate Doctoral Thesis in Geological Geography, Hanoi, 1996. 11. Decision No. 2033/QD – UB on detailed planning of Tien Lang town, Hai Phong city until 2020. 12. Department of Culture, Information, Hai Phong Museum, Hai Phong relics - National ranked scenic spot, Hai Phong Publishing House, 2005. 13. Tien Lang District People's Committee, Economic Development Planning - Culture - Society of Tien Lang district to 2010. 14.Website www.HaiPhong.gov.vn APPENDIX 1 List of national ranked monuments STT Name of the monument Number, year of decisiondetermine Location 1 Gam Temple 938 VH/QĐ04/08/1992 Cam Khe Village- Toan Thang commune 2 Doc Hau Temple 9381 VH/QĐ04/08/1992 Doc Hau Village –Toan Thang commune 3 Cuu Doi Communal House 3207 VH/QĐDecember 30, 1991 Zone II of townTien Lang 4 Ha Dai Temple 938 VH/QĐ04/08/1992 Ha Dai Village –Tien Thanh commune APPENDIX II STT Name of the monument Number, year of decision Location 1 Phu Ke Pagoda Temple 178/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005 Zone 1 - townTien Lang 2 Trung Lang Temple 178/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005 Zone 4 – townTien Lang 3 Bao Khanh Pagoda 1900/QD-UBAugust 24, 2006 Nam Tu Village -Kien Thiet commune 4 Bach Da Pagoda 1792/QD-UB11/11/2002 Hung Thang Commune 5 Ngoc Dong Temple 177/QD-UBNovember 27, 2005 Tien Thanh Commune 6 Tomb of Minister TSNhu Van Lan 2848/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2003 Nam Tu Village -Kien Thiet commune 7 Canh Son Stone Temple 2160/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2003 Van Doi Commune –Doan Lap 8 Meiji Temple 2259/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2002 Toan Thang Commune 9 Tien Doi Noi Temple 477/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2005 Doan Lap Commune 10 Tu Doi Temple 177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005 Doan Lap Commune 11 Duyen Lao Temple 177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005 Tien Minh Commune 12 Dinh Xuan Uc Pagoda 177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005 Bac Hung Commune 13 Chu Khe Pagoda 177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005 Hung Thang Commune 14 Dong Dinh 2848/QD-UBNovember 21, 2002 Vinh Quang Commune 15 President's Memorial HouseTon Duc Thang 177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005 NT Quy Cao Ha Dai Temple Ben Vua Temple Tien Lang hot spring div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 16pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 6pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 12pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex
• Solutions to Mobilize Investment Resources for Tourism Human Resource Development
• Identify Rating Levels and Rating Scales zt2i3t4l5ee zt2a3gstourism,quan lan,quang ninh,ecology,ecotourism,minh chau,van don,geography,geographical basis,tourism development,science zt2a3ge zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts of the islanders. Therefore, this indicator will be divided into two sub-indicators: a1. Natural tourism attractiveness a2. Cultural tourism attractiveness b. Tourist capacity The two island communes in Quan Lan have different capacities to receive tourists. Minh Chau Commune is home to many standard hotels and resorts, attracting high-income domestic and international tourists. Meanwhile, Quan Lan Commune has many motels mainly built and operated by local people, so the scale and quality are not high, and will be suitable for ordinary tourists such as students. c. Time of exploitation of Quan Lan Island Commune: Quan Lan tourism is seasonal due to weather and climate conditions and festivals only take place on certain days of the year, specifically in spring. In Quan Lan commune, the period from April to June and from September to November is considered the best time to visit Quan Lan because the cultural tourism activities are mainly associated with festivals taking place during this time. Minh Chau island commune: Tourism exploitation time is all year round, because this is a place with a number of tourist attractions with diverse ecosystems such as Bai Tu Long National Park Research Center, Tram forest, Turtle Laying Beach, so besides coming to the beach for tourism and vacation in the summer, Minh Chau will attract research groups to come for tourism combined with research at other times of the year. d. Sustainability The sustainability of ecotourism sites in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes depends on the sensitivity of the ecosystems to climate changes. landscape. In general, these tourist destinations have a fairly high level of sustainability, because they are natural ecosystems, planned and protected. However, if a large number of tourists gather at certain times, it can exceed the carrying capacity and affect the sustainability of the environment (polluted beaches, damaged trees, animals moving away from their habitats, etc.), then the sustainability of the above ecosystems (natural ecosystems, human ecosystems) will also be affected and become less sustainable. e. Location and accessibility Both island communes have ports to take tourists to visit from Van Don wharf: - Quan Lan – Van Don traffic route: Phuc Thinh – Viet Anh high-speed boat and Quang Minh high-speed boat, depart at 8am and 2pm from Van Don to Quan Lan, and at 7am and 1pm from Quan Lan to Van Don. There are also wooden boats departing at 7am and 1pm. - Van Don - Minh Chau traffic route: Chung Huong high-speed train, Minh Chau train, morning 7:30 and afternoon 13:30 from Van Don to Minh Chau, morning 6:30 and afternoon 13:00 from Minh Chau to Van Don. f. Infrastructure Despite receiving investment attention, the issue of infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism on Quan Lan Island is still an issue that needs to be resolved because it has a direct impact on the implementation of ecotourism activities. The minimum conditions for serving tourists such as accommodation, electricity, water, communication, especially medical services, and security work need to be given top priority. Ecotourism spots in Minh Chau commune are assessed to have better infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism because there are quite complete and synchronous conditions for serving tourists, meeting many needs of domestic and foreign tourists. 3.2.1.4. Determine assessment levels and assessment scales Corresponding to the levels of each criterion, the index is the score of those levels in the order of 4, 3, 2, 1 decreasing according to the standard of each level: very attractive (4), attractive (3), average (2), less attractive (1). 3.2.1.5. Determining the coefficients of the criteria For the assessment of DLST in the two communes of Quan Lan and Minh Chau islands, the students added evaluation coefficients to show the importance of the criteria and indicators as follows: Coefficient 3 with criteria: Attractiveness, Exploitation time. These are the 2 most important criteria for attracting tourists to tourism in general and eco-tourism in particular, so they have the highest coefficient. Coefficient 2 with criteria: Capacity, Infrastructure, Location and accessibility . Because the assessment area is an island commune of Van Don district, the above criteria are selected by the author with appropriate coefficients at the average level. Coefficient 1 with criteria: Sustainability. Quan Lan has natural and human-made ecotourism sites, with high biodiversity and little impact from local human factors. Most of the ecotourism sites are still wild, so they are highly sustainable. 3.2.1.6. Results of DLST assessment on Quan Lan island a. Assessment of the potential for natural tourism development  For Minh Chau commune: + Natural tourism attractiveness is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12. + Capacity is determined as average (2 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of Capacity criterion is 2 x 2 = 4. + Exploitation time is long (4 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Exploitation time criterion is 4 x 3 = 12. + Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points + Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points. + Infrastructure is assessed as good (3 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 3 x 2 = 6 points. The total score for evaluating DLST in Minh Chau commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 4 + 12 + 4 + 4 + 6 = 42 points Similar assessment for Quan Lan commune, we have the following table: Table 3.3: Assessment of the potential for natural ecotourism development in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes Attractiveness of self-tourismof course Capacity Mining time Sustainability Location and accessibility Infrastructure Result Point DarkMulti Point DarkMulti Point DarkMulti Point DarkMulti Point DarkMulti Point DarkMulti CommuneMinh Chau 12 12 4 8 12 12 4 4 4 8 6 8 42/52 Quan CommuneLan 6 12 6 8 9 12 4 4 4 8 4 8 33/52 b. Assessment of the potential for humanistic tourism development  For Quan Lan commune: + The attractiveness of human tourism is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12. + Capacity is determined to be large (3 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Capacity criterion is 3 x 2 = 6. + Mining time is average (3 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Mining time criterion is 3 x 3 = 9. + Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points. + Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points. + Infrastructure is rated as average (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 2 x 2 = 4 points. The total score for evaluating DLST in Quan Lan commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 6 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 4 = 36 points. Similar assessment with Minh Chau commune we have the following table: Table 3.4: Assessment of the potential for developing humanistic eco-tourism in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes Attractiveness of human tourismliterature Capacity Mining time Sustainability Location and accessibility Infrastructure Result Point DarkMulti Point DarkMulti Point DarkMulti Point DarkMulti Point DarkMulti Point DarkMulti Quan CommuneLan 12 12 6 8 9 12 4 4 4 8 4 8 39/52 Minh CommuneChau 6 12 4 8 12 12 4 4 4 8 6 8 36/52 Basically, both Minh Chau and Quan Lan localities have quite favorable conditions for developing ecotourism. However, Quan Lan commune has more advantages to develop ecotourism in a humanistic direction, because this is an area with many famous historical relics such as Quan Lan Communal House, Quan Lan Pagoda, Temple worshiping the hero Tran Khanh Du, ... along with local festivals held annually such as the wind praying ceremony (March 15), Quan Lan festival (June 10-19); due to its location near the port and long exploitation time, the beaches in Quan Lan commune (especially Quan Lan beach) are no longer hygienic and clean to ensure the needs of tourists coming to relax and swim; this is also an area with many beautiful landscapes such as Got Beo wind pass, Ong Phong head, Voi Voi cave, but the ability to access these places is still very limited (dirt hill road, lots of gravel and rocks), especially during rainy and windy times; In addition, other natural resources such as mangrove forests and sea worms have not been really exploited for tourism purposes and ecotourism development. On the contrary, Minh Chau commune has more advantages in developing ecotourism in the direction of natural tourism, this is an area with diverse ecosystems such as at Rua De Beach, Bai Tu Long National Park Conservation Center...; Minh Chau beach is highly appreciated for its natural beauty and cleanliness, ranked in the top ten most beautiful beaches in Vietnam; Minh Chau commune is also home to Tram forest with a large area and a purity of up to 90%, suitable for building bridges through the forest (a very effective type of natural ecotourism currently applied by many countries) for tourists to sightsee, as well as for the purpose of studying and researching. Figure 3.1: Thenmala Forest Bridge (India) Source: https://www.thenmalaecotourism.com/(August 21, 2019) 3.2.2. Using SWOT matrix to evaluate Quan Lan island tourism General assessment of current tourism activities of Quan Lan island is shown through the following SWOT matrix: Table 3.5: SWOT matrix evaluating tourism activities on Quan Lan island Internal agent Strengths- There is a lot of potential for tourism development, especially natural ecotourism and humanistic ecotourism.- The unskilled labor force is relatively abundant.- resource environmentunpolluted, still Weaknesses- Poorly developed infrastructure, especially traffic routes to tourist destinations on the island.- The team of professional staff is still weak.- Tourism products in general quite wild, originalintact general and DLST in particularalone is monotonous. External agents Opportunity- Tourism is a key industry in the socio-economic development strategy of the province and Van Don economic zone.- Quan Lan was selected as a pilot area for eco-tourism development within the framework of the green growth project between Quang Ninh province and the Japanese organization JICA.- The flow of tourists and especially ecotourism in the world tends toincreasing Challenge- Weather and climate change abnormally.- Competition in tourism products is increasingly fierce, especially with other localities in the province such as Ha Long, Mong Cai...- Awareness of tourists, especially domestic tourists, about ecotourism and nature conservation is not high. Through summary analysis using SWOT matrix we see that:  To exploit strengths and take advantage of opportunities, it is necessary to: - Diversify products and service types (build more tourism routes aimed at specific needs of tourists: experiential tourism immersed in nature, spiritual cultural tourism...) - Effective exploitation of resources and differentiated products (natural resources and human resources) div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: #0D0D0D; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -3pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Symbol, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:Wingdings; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:Cambria, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: #212121; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex
• Developing human resources for Ho Chi Minh City's tourism industry in the period 2013-2020 - 2
• Exploiting human tourism resources to develop tourism in Ho Chi Minh City - 29

Vietnam is a country with rich and diverse tourism resources, from human tourism resources to natural tourism resources such as: Ha Long Bay, Ho Dynasty Citadel, Ca Tru, Hoi An ancient town, Trang An, ... These tourism resources have contributed significantly to introducing the beauty of our homeland to friends around the world. At the same time, they also create conditions to promote economic and social development. However, if people only know how to exploit and use tourism resources without protecting and preserving them, the resources will gradually fade away. In response to the urgent needs of reality, the Vietnam Tourism Law was issued in 2005 to protect and develop the country's tourism resources. The implementation of legal regulations on the protection of tourism resources

Tourism in some localities has achieved positive results. However, there are still many limitations and shortcomings.

2.2.2.1. Limitations in implementing legal regulations on protecting tourism resources in some localities

The biggest limitation in implementing the legal regulations on tourism resource protection in localities is that the protection of tourism resources has only stopped at the responsibility of the State and has not become a concern of the whole community and tourism enterprises. The common situation is that factories and enterprises still discharge waste directly into the environment, causing environmental pollution in general and pollution, negatively affecting tourism resources, affecting the development of tourism in the country. Some typical cases are according to Decision No. 64/2003/QD-TTg dated April 22, 2003 of the Prime Minister, Ninh Binh province has 8 establishments causing serious environmental pollution that must be thoroughly handled in the fields of construction materials, fertilizer production, chemicals or agricultural processing; in Binh Thuan province, waste from the mainland flows into the sea through seven large rivers and is washed ashore by waves, polluting beaches and tourist areas. In particular, in Phan Thiet Bay, waste from Ca Ty River and Cai River flows out and stagnates for a long time with many types of household, production and seafood processing waste. Thuan An Beach is gradually becoming a large "garbage dump". Along the beach, there are many types of waste, from plastic bags, packaging, cake and candy wrappers, fruit peels, milk cartons... The waste has seriously polluted the coast, leaving a bad impression on tourists visiting;... In some traditional craft villages in Hanoi, people are not yet aware of environmental protection, do not comply with legal regulations on environmental protection in craft villages (vi

violating the prohibitions in the 2005 Tourism Law, the 2012 Water Resources Law, the 2005 and 2014 Environmental Protection Laws, etc.). According to environmental monitoring

Air quality in 46 craft villages in Hanoi, nearly 98% of craft villages have at least one air quality indicator exceeding the permitted standard; 100% of craft villages have at least one wastewater analysis indicator exceeding the standard. The environmental pollution in craft villages is on the rise. In craft villages processing agricultural products and food, surface water in many places has COD, BOD5, NH4+, and Coliform levels that exceed the standard by dozens to hundreds of times. Surface water in textile and dyeing craft villages is also heavily polluted. Notably, in Van Ha and Lien Ha wood craft villages, the content of volatile organic substances is 3 to 5 times higher than the permitted standard, the temperature in Bat Trang pottery village is 1.5 to 30 degrees Celsius higher than the surrounding area; the noise in Xuan Phuong and Duc Tu craft villages is 3 to 4 times higher than the permitted standard [32].

In Nha Trang, currently some natural resources in Nha Trang Bay are rapidly declining and clearly affecting the environment. Natural coral reefs are gradually disappearing while natural recovery is taking place too slowly, in some places they are even gone. Previously, seaweed was considered the most abundant resource and could be found anywhere in Nha Trang Bay. People only collected the amount of mature seaweed drifting ashore to sell, but in recent years, the massive exploitation of seaweed in an destructive manner has caused this resource to decrease rapidly and alarmingly. Some other resources have also decreased significantly such as seagrass, sea turtles, etc. On the other hand, the main source of waste is from household waste, domestic wastewater and wastewater from companies and factories located in the city through sewers, rainwater and then concentrated in two large rivers (Cai River and Tac River), then discharged directly into Nha Trang Bay. Besides, waste from aquaculture and tourism activities also directly affect the environment of Nha Trang Bay [35].

From the above situation, we can see that the enforcement of laws on tourism resource protection is still ineffective in some localities. Localities still

unable to manage and implement properly according to legal regulations on protecting tourism resources.

2.2.2.2. Limitations in implementing activities to manage and protect tourism resources and handle violations in exploiting tourism resources

The management and protection of tourism resources as well as the handling of violations in the exploitation of tourism resources have not been thoroughly implemented in some localities. The management of tourism resources is still loose, lacking responsibility in protecting and enhancing tourism resources. There is no close coordination between central and local agencies in protecting tourism resources. The quality of activities of state management agencies on tourism is still limited, and there are no clear sanctions for violations. Regulations are currently being issued by many agencies with little attention to the benefits of environmental protection. In addition, the enforcement of regulations on environmental protection in the tourism sector is not strict and is not carried out by independent departments and agencies, without links with other sectors. Inspection and assessment activities in the protection and handling of violations of tourism resources are not carried out regularly. There are many agencies responsible for implementation but lack of coordination leading to low efficiency. The management of tourism environment has not met practical requirements leading to encroachment, risking depletion of natural and human resources. Districts, cities, towns and tourism units and enterprises do not have a team of staff trained in the field of environment, so it is very difficult to manage and protect the tourism environment.

2.2.2.3. Limitations on people's awareness in protecting tourism resources

Nowadays, the situation of tourists going to tourist destinations and littering, causing loss of landscape and environmental pollution is quite common. Given the situation,

The tourism industry must have specific measures to prevent this, otherwise it will leave a bad image in the eyes of international tourists and affect the living environment.

People are not aware of protecting tourism resources, do not recognize the importance of protecting tourism resources, making it difficult to repair, preserve and develop. Resources and the environment are declining due to unreasonable exploitation and use, and the impacts of natural disasters are increasing, occurring in many regions and localities across the country.

Many resources have the potential to be exploited but due to being neglected, forgotten and destroyed, they are still left open. Therefore, the authorities need to have specific solutions to raise people's awareness and responsibility in protecting tourism resources. Only then can tourism resources be preserved and developed. This is also an urgent issue that needs attention in the process of building and developing this smokeless industry.

2.2.3. Causes of shortcomings and limitations in protecting tourism resources

In addition to the causes of shortcomings in the legal regulations on tourism resource protection in Vietnam as analyzed above, the inadequacies and limitations in protecting tourism resources also originate from the following causes:

Firstly, propaganda and education work to raise awareness of protecting tourism resources for people is still limited.

Propaganda work to raise people's awareness in protecting tourism resources has been carried out but the results are still limited. Besides those who strictly follow the law and try to preserve and protect tourism resources, there are still many people who do not follow the law and still destroy resources.

Currently, the propaganda and education of people about the role of tourism resources in the socio-economic development of the country and the value of

It has only been propagated and popularized in meetings, conferences or somewhat mentioned through mass media such as newspapers, radio, internet, etc. but there is no emphasis, no specific and extensive propaganda measures to all classes of people. On the other hand, not everyone attends meetings or everyone regularly accesses the internet or listens to propaganda information about protecting tourism resources. From this reality, people do not have high awareness in protecting and developing resources. Therefore, a part of the people have violated and destroyed resources such as: littering in relic sites, scenic spots, dumping wastewater directly into rivers, lakes, causing unsanitary conditions, polluting resources, etc.

Because of not realizing the importance of tourism resources, some people have continuously damaged it. This is the reason why our country's tourism resources are gradually being lost and depleted.

Second, the work of checking, inspecting and supervising the protection of tourism resources has not been carried out regularly.

State management of tourism is not really strict and still has many shortcomings. Planning and implementation of tourism development planning are slow. The exploitation and use of tourism resources are inspected and monitored, but the quality of inspection and monitoring is not good in some localities. The current frequency of reporting does not meet the requirements for immediate handling of violations in the protection of tourism resources. On the other hand, the quality of human resources in the management, protection and handling of violations is still weak. Key departments and branches often lack human resources, are not fully trained and do not have enough authority to monitor and handle problems effectively. Awareness of the role and sustainable development of tourism by the community and authorities at all levels, especially businesses, has not kept up with the requirements of integration. Most tourism businesses are small and medium-sized, with limited capacity.

Management is still weak. Management of tourism resources is still inadequate. The decentralization of sectors in the management of tourism environment is not really clear, leading to inconsistency and overlap in monitoring, inspection and administrative sanctions in the environmental field.

Third, the growth rate of service tourism types.

The rapid increase in the number of tourist areas and tourist service establishments has narrowed the area of ​​natural land, especially agricultural land, leading to a reduction in wetland area, deforestation for soil causing erosion, leaching... Developing tourism in coastal areas with traffic systems, hotels, golf courses... is also one of the reasons for increasing the demand for sand mining, reducing the area of ​​coastal protection forests leading to the risk of coastal erosion, causing sand flying phenomena and other forms of land degradation. Domestic waste in tourist areas is swept daily and collected in public trash bins for treatment, however, littering still occurs in many places around some tourist attractions. In coastal tourist areas, waste washed ashore by waves and discharged by businesses has not been thoroughly collected, spoiling the beauty of the tourist space.