The rapid increase in revenue from tourists is the premise for increasing the GDP contribution of Hai Phong tourism in general to the city's total GDP. In addition, Hai Phong's key industries such as industry, seafood processing, and garment are still maintained at a high level, thereby improving the quality, efficiency, and competitiveness of the city's economy, creating favorable conditions for businesses, creating a more open investment and production environment, and business services, including tourism, developing rapidly and sustainably. This is consistent with the economic development orientation of the Party and the State, which is to shift the economy towards gradually increasing the proportion of the economic sector in the national economy.
1.2.10. Current status of tourists:
Hai Phong is a city with favorable conditions and tourism resources. In recent years, along with the development of Vietnam's tourism industry, Hai Phong tourism has also grown steadily, attracting a number of international and domestic visitors.
Table: Number of tourists to Hai Phong (2003 – 2008)
Target
Unit | Year | ||||||
2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | ||
Total views guest | Thousand turn | 1680 | 2100 | 2393 | 2963 | 3620 | 3484 |
International | Thousand turn | 350 | 440 | 558 | 606 | 719 | 818 |
Inland | Thousand turn | 1330 | 1660 | 1834 | 2357 | 2901 | 2666 |
Maybe you are interested!
-
Exploiting the cultural value of Hang Kenh communal house - Hai Phong to serve tourism development - 1 -
Current situation and solutions for tourism development at Bao Ha Cultural Tourism Village, Dong Minh Commune, Vinh Bao District, Hai Phong - 6 -
Exploiting the cultural value of Hang Kenh communal house - Hai Phong to serve tourism development - 6 -
Solutions for tourism development in Tien Lang - 10
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism, tourism development
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
- District People's Committees and authorities of communes with tourist attractions should support, promote, and provide necessary information to people, helping them improve their knowledge about tourism. Raise tourism awareness for local people.
*
* *
Due to limited knowledge and research time, the thesis inevitably has shortcomings. Therefore, I look forward to receiving guidance from teachers, experts as well as your comments to make the thesis more complete.
Chapter III Conclusion
Through the issues presented in Chapter II, we can come to some conclusions:
Based on the strengths of available tourism resources, the types of tourism in Tien Lang that need to be promoted in the coming time are sightseeing and resort tourism, discovery tourism, weekend tourism. To improve the quality and diversify tourism products, Tien Lang district needs to combine with local cultural tourism resources, at the same time combine with surrounding areas, build rich tourism products. The strengths of Tien Lang tourism are eco-tourism and cultural tourism, so developing Tien Lang tourism must always go hand in hand with restoring and preserving types of cultural tourism resources. Some necessary measures to support and improve the efficiency of exploiting tourism resources in Tien Lang are: strengthening the construction of technical facilities and labor force serving tourism, actively promoting and advertising tourism, and expanding forms of capital mobilization for tourism development.
CONCLUDE
I Conclusion
1. Based on the results achieved within the framework of the thesis's needs, some basic conclusions can be drawn as follows:
Tien Lang is a locality with great potential for tourism development. The relatively abundant cultural tourism resources and ecological tourism resources have great appeal to tourists. Based on this potential, Tien Lang can build a unique tourism industry that is competitive enough with other localities within Hai Phong city and neighboring areas.
In recent years, the exploitation of the advantages of resources to develop tourism and build tourist routes in Tien Lang has not been commensurate with the available potential. In terms of quantity, many resource objects have not been brought into the purpose of tourism development. In terms of time, the regular service time has not been extended to attract more visitors. Infrastructure and technical facilities are still weak. The labor force is still thin and weak in terms of expertise. Tourism programs and routes have not been organized properly, the exploitation content is still monotonous, so it has not attracted many visitors. Although resources have not been mobilized much for tourism development, they are facing the risk of destruction and degradation.
2. Based on the results of investigation, analysis, synthesis, evaluation and selective absorption of research results of related topics, the thesis has proposed a number of necessary solutions to improve the efficiency of exploiting tourism resources in Tien Lang such as: promoting the restoration and conservation of tourism resources, focusing on investment and key exploitation of ecotourism resources, strengthening the construction of infrastructure and tourism workforce. Expanding forms of capital mobilization. In addition, the thesis has built a number of tourist routes of Hai Phong in which Tien Lang tourism resources play an important role.
Exploiting Tien Lang tourism resources for tourism development is currently facing many difficulties. The above measures, if applied synchronously, will likely bring new prospects for the local tourism industry, contributing to making Tien Lang tourism an important economic sector in the district's economic structure.
REFERENCES
1. Nhuan Ha, Trinh Minh Hien, Tran Phuong, Hai Phong - Historical and cultural relics, Hai Phong Publishing House, 1993
2. Hai Phong City History Council, Hai Phong Gazetteer, Hai Phong Publishing House, 1990.
3. Hai Phong City History Council, History of Tien Lang District Party Committee, Hai Phong Publishing House, 1990.
4. Hai Phong City History Council, University of Social Sciences and Humanities, VNU, Hai Phong Place Names Encyclopedia, Hai Phong Publishing House. 2001.
5. Law on Cultural Heritage and documents guiding its implementation, National Political Publishing House, Hanoi, 2003.
6. Tran Duc Thanh, Lecture on Tourism Geography, Faculty of Tourism, University of Social Sciences and Humanities, VNU, 2006
7. Hai Phong Center for Social Sciences and Humanities, Some typical cultural heritages of Hai Phong, Hai Phong Publishing House, 2001
8. Nguyen Ngoc Thao (editor-in-chief, Tourism Geography, Hai Phong Publishing House, two volumes (2001-2002)
9. Nguyen Minh Tue and group of authors, Hai Phong Tourism Geography, Ho Chi Minh City Publishing House, 1997.
10. Nguyen Thanh Son, Hai Phong Tourism Territory Organization, Associate Doctoral Thesis in Geological Geography, Hanoi, 1996.
11. Decision No. 2033/QD – UB on detailed planning of Tien Lang town, Hai Phong city until 2020.
12. Department of Culture, Information, Hai Phong Museum, Hai Phong relics
- National ranked scenic spot, Hai Phong Publishing House, 2005. 13. Tien Lang District People's Committee, Economic Development Planning -
Culture - Society of Tien Lang district to 2010.
14.Website www.HaiPhong.gov.vn
APPENDIX 1
List of national ranked monuments
STT
Name of the monument
Number, year of decisiondetermine
Location
1
Gam Temple
938 VH/QĐ04/08/1992
Cam Khe Village- Toan Thang commune
2
Doc Hau Temple
9381 VH/QĐ04/08/1992
Doc Hau Village –Toan Thang commune
3
Cuu Doi Communal House
3207 VH/QĐDecember 30, 1991
Zone II of townTien Lang
4
Ha Dai Temple
938 VH/QĐ04/08/1992
Ha Dai Village –Tien Thanh commune
APPENDIX II
STT
Name of the monument
Number, year of decision
Location
1
Phu Ke Pagoda Temple
178/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Zone 1 - townTien Lang
2
Trung Lang Temple
178/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Zone 4 – townTien Lang
3
Bao Khanh Pagoda
1900/QD-UBAugust 24, 2006
Nam Tu Village -Kien Thiet commune
4
Bach Da Pagoda
1792/QD-UB11/11/2002
Hung Thang Commune
5
Ngoc Dong Temple
177/QD-UBNovember 27, 2005
Tien Thanh Commune
6
Tomb of Minister TSNhu Van Lan
2848/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2003
Nam Tu Village -Kien Thiet commune
7
Canh Son Stone Temple
2160/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2003
Van Doi Commune –Doan Lap
8
Meiji Temple
2259/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2002
Toan Thang Commune
9
Tien Doi Noi Temple
477/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2005
Doan Lap Commune
10
Tu Doi Temple
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Doan Lap Commune
11
Duyen Lao Temple
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Tien Minh Commune
12
Dinh Xuan Uc Pagoda
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Bac Hung Commune
13
Chu Khe Pagoda
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Hung Thang Commune
14
Dong Dinh
2848/QD-UBNovember 21, 2002
Vinh Quang Commune
15
President's Memorial HouseTon Duc Thang
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
NT Quy Cao
Ha Dai Temple
Ben Vua Temple
Tien Lang hot spring
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 16pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 6pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 12pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
Identify Rating Levels and Rating Scales
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism,quan lan,quang ninh,ecology,ecotourism,minh chau,van don,geography,geographical basis,tourism development,science
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
of the islanders. Therefore, this indicator will be divided into two sub-indicators:
a1. Natural tourism attractiveness a2. Cultural tourism attractiveness
b. Tourist capacity
The two island communes in Quan Lan have different capacities to receive tourists. Minh Chau Commune is home to many standard hotels and resorts, attracting high-income domestic and international tourists. Meanwhile, Quan Lan Commune has many motels mainly built and operated by local people, so the scale and quality are not high, and will be suitable for ordinary tourists such as students.
c. Time of exploitation of Quan Lan Island Commune:
Quan Lan tourism is seasonal due to weather and climate conditions and festivals only take place on certain days of the year, specifically in spring. In Quan Lan commune, the period from April to June and from September to November is considered the best time to visit Quan Lan because the cultural tourism activities are mainly associated with festivals taking place during this time.
Minh Chau island commune:
Tourism exploitation time is all year round, because this is a place with a number of tourist attractions with diverse ecosystems such as Bai Tu Long National Park Research Center, Tram forest, Turtle Laying Beach, so besides coming to the beach for tourism and vacation in the summer, Minh Chau will attract research groups to come for tourism combined with research at other times of the year.
d. Sustainability
The sustainability of ecotourism sites in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes depends on the sensitivity of the ecosystems to climate changes.
landscape. In general, these tourist destinations have a fairly high level of sustainability, because they are natural ecosystems, planned and protected. However, if a large number of tourists gather at certain times, it can exceed the carrying capacity and affect the sustainability of the environment (polluted beaches, damaged trees, animals moving away from their habitats, etc.), then the sustainability of the above ecosystems (natural ecosystems, human ecosystems) will also be affected and become less sustainable.
e. Location and accessibility
Both island communes have ports to take tourists to visit from Van Don wharf:
- Quan Lan – Van Don traffic route:
Phuc Thinh – Viet Anh high-speed boat and Quang Minh high-speed boat, depart at 8am and 2pm from Van Don to Quan Lan, and at 7am and 1pm from Quan Lan to Van Don. There are also wooden boats departing at 7am and 1pm.
- Van Don - Minh Chau traffic route:
Chung Huong high-speed train, Minh Chau train, morning 7:30 and afternoon 13:30 from Van Don to Minh Chau, morning 6:30 and afternoon 13:00 from Minh Chau to Van Don.
f. Infrastructure
Despite receiving investment attention, the issue of infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism on Quan Lan Island is still an issue that needs to be resolved because it has a direct impact on the implementation of ecotourism activities. The minimum conditions for serving tourists such as accommodation, electricity, water, communication, especially medical services, and security work need to be given top priority. Ecotourism spots in Minh Chau commune are assessed to have better infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism because there are quite complete and synchronous conditions for serving tourists, meeting many needs of domestic and foreign tourists.
3.2.1.4. Determine assessment levels and assessment scales
Corresponding to the levels of each criterion, the index is the score of those levels in the order of 4, 3, 2, 1 decreasing according to the standard of each level: very attractive (4), attractive (3), average (2), less attractive (1).
3.2.1.5. Determining the coefficients of the criteria
For the assessment of DLST in the two communes of Quan Lan and Minh Chau islands, the students added evaluation coefficients to show the importance of the criteria and indicators as follows:
Coefficient 3 with criteria: Attractiveness, Exploitation time. These are the 2 most important criteria for attracting tourists to tourism in general and eco-tourism in particular, so they have the highest coefficient.
Coefficient 2 with criteria: Capacity, Infrastructure, Location and accessibility . Because the assessment area is an island commune of Van Don district, the above criteria are selected by the author with appropriate coefficients at the average level.
Coefficient 1 with criteria: Sustainability. Quan Lan has natural and human-made ecotourism sites, with high biodiversity and little impact from local human factors. Most of the ecotourism sites are still wild, so they are highly sustainable.
3.2.1.6. Results of DLST assessment on Quan Lan island
a. Assessment of the potential for natural tourism development
For Minh Chau commune:
+ Natural tourism attractiveness is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined as average (2 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of Capacity criterion is 2 x 2 = 4.
+ Exploitation time is long (4 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Exploitation time criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is assessed as good (3 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 3 x 2 = 6 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Minh Chau commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 4 + 12 + 4 + 4 + 6 = 42 points
Similar assessment for Quan Lan commune, we have the following table:
Table 3.3: Assessment of the potential for natural ecotourism development in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of self-tourismof course
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
CommuneMinh Chau
12
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
42/52
Quan CommuneLan
6
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
33/52
b. Assessment of the potential for humanistic tourism development
For Quan Lan commune:
+ The attractiveness of human tourism is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined to be large (3 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Capacity criterion is 3 x 2 = 6.
+ Mining time is average (3 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Mining time criterion is 3 x 3 = 9.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points.
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is rated as average (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Quan Lan commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 6 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 4 = 36 points.
Similar assessment with Minh Chau commune we have the following table:
Table 3.4: Assessment of the potential for developing humanistic eco-tourism in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of human tourismliterature
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Quan CommuneLan
12
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
39/52
Minh CommuneChau
6
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
36/52
Basically, both Minh Chau and Quan Lan localities have quite favorable conditions for developing ecotourism. However, Quan Lan commune has more advantages to develop ecotourism in a humanistic direction, because this is an area with many famous historical relics such as Quan Lan Communal House, Quan Lan Pagoda, Temple worshiping the hero Tran Khanh Du, ... along with local festivals held annually such as the wind praying ceremony (March 15), Quan Lan festival (June 10-19); due to its location near the port and long exploitation time, the beaches in Quan Lan commune (especially Quan Lan beach) are no longer hygienic and clean to ensure the needs of tourists coming to relax and swim; this is also an area with many beautiful landscapes such as Got Beo wind pass, Ong Phong head, Voi Voi cave, but the ability to access these places is still very limited (dirt hill road, lots of gravel and rocks), especially during rainy and windy times; In addition, other natural resources such as mangrove forests and sea worms have not been really exploited for tourism purposes and ecotourism development. On the contrary, Minh Chau commune has more advantages in developing ecotourism in the direction of natural tourism, this is an area with diverse ecosystems such as at Rua De Beach, Bai Tu Long National Park Conservation Center...; Minh Chau beach is highly appreciated for its natural beauty and cleanliness, ranked in the top ten most beautiful beaches in Vietnam; Minh Chau commune is also home to Tram forest with a large area and a purity of up to 90%, suitable for building bridges through the forest (a very effective type of natural ecotourism currently applied by many countries) for tourists to sightsee, as well as for the purpose of studying and researching.
Figure 3.1: Thenmala Forest Bridge (India) Source: https://www.thenmalaecotourism.com/(August 21, 2019)
3.2.2. Using SWOT matrix to evaluate Quan Lan island tourism
General assessment of current tourism activities of Quan Lan island is shown through the following SWOT matrix:
Table 3.5: SWOT matrix evaluating tourism activities on Quan Lan island
Internal agent
Strengths- There is a lot of potential for tourism development, especially natural ecotourism and humanistic ecotourism.- The unskilled labor force is relatively abundant.- resource environmentunpolluted, still
Weaknesses- Poorly developed infrastructure, especially traffic routes to tourist destinations on the island.- The team of professional staff is still weak.- Tourism products in general
quite wild, originalintact
general and DLST in particularalone is monotonous.
External agents
Opportunity- Tourism is a key industry in the socio-economic development strategy of the province and Van Don economic zone.- Quan Lan was selected as a pilot area for eco-tourism development within the framework of the green growth project between Quang Ninh province and the Japanese organization JICA.- The flow of tourists and especially ecotourism in the world tends toincreasing
Challenge- Weather and climate change abnormally.- Competition in tourism products is increasingly fierce, especially with other localities in the province such as Ha Long, Mong Cai...- Awareness of tourists, especially domestic tourists, about ecotourism and nature conservation is not high.
Through summary analysis using SWOT matrix we see that:
To exploit strengths and take advantage of opportunities, it is necessary to:
- Diversify products and service types (build more tourism routes aimed at specific needs of tourists: experiential tourism immersed in nature, spiritual cultural tourism...)
- Effective exploitation of resources and differentiated products (natural resources and human resources)
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: #0D0D0D; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -3pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Symbol, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:Wingdings; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:Cambria, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: #212121; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex

( Source: Report of Hai Phong Department of Tourism)
Previously, international tourists to Hai Phong were mainly visitors for sightseeing and vacations signed under cooperation and exchange agreements between Vietnam and other countries, especially Eastern European countries. Therefore, the number of visitors was extremely limited.
In recent years, with the attention and investment of the State in building infrastructure and the Hai Phong tourism industry paying more attention to propaganda and promotion, the number of tourists to Hai Phong has increased, both international and domestic.
International visitors to Hai Phong had an average annual growth rate of 19% in 2003 - 2008. Domestic visitors accounted for 80% of the average annual growth rate in the period 2003 - 2008, reaching 18.25%.
1.2.11. Directions for Hai Phong tourism development in the coming time:
Hai Phong identifies tourism as a key economic sector, tourism development is the direction to promote the city's structural transformation, promoting the development of economic sectors.
The direction of Hai Phong tourism development in the coming years is to exploit to the maximum the potentials and advantages of the city in terms of natural landscapes, human resources, ensure ecological environment, diversify tourism products in the city's GDP, create jobs for workers, improve people's knowledge, preserve national cultural identity and local cultural characteristics, promote the combined strength of all levels, sectors and the entire population to develop tourism, contributing to promoting the rapid development of the economic structure towards industrialization and modernization.
Table: Hai Phong tourism development targets for the period 2010 - 2020
Target
Unit | Year | |||
2010 | 2015 | 2020 | ||
1.Total LK | 1000LK | 4,250 | 4,600 | 6,000 |
- International | 1000LK | 1,120 | 1,700 | 2,400 |
- Domestic | 1000LK | 3.130 | 2,900 | 3,600 |
2.Total revenue | Million USD | 527.5 | 1,186.5 | 2,364.0 |
3. Direct labor | People | 21.76 | 33.60 | 52.90 |
4. Investment capital | Million USD | 976.5 | 1,552.9 | 2,801.6 |
5.Industry GDP/GDP city | % | 9.2 | 12.8 | 17.9 |
(Source: Institute for Tourism Development Research)
1.3. Assessment of the current situation of tourism business in Hai Phong:
In general, tourism activities in Hai Phong since 1995 have had encouraging developments. The figures on tourism revenue and the number of tourists coming to Hai Phong are increasing, which proves that Hai Phong is increasingly becoming a tourist destination attracting the attention of tourists.
To achieve these results, we must first mention the tourism management of Hai Phong city, in which the Department of Tourism, which is the State management agency for tourism in the city, has performed its management function well. In addition to managing and planning tourist areas and tourist attractions, the Department of Tourism of Hai Phong has introduced effective tourism promotion and advertising policies, and has attracted a large number of tourists to Hai Phong city.
Hai Phong also has investment policies, upgrading, repairing and building new restaurants and hotels, many entertainment areas serving tourism are also invested and developed. Besides, means of transportation such as taxis, buses, boats, etc. serving tourism are also gradually meeting the needs of tourists.
The team of tour guides and tourist service staff are also improved in terms of professional expertise, foreign languages, etc.
Domestic and international travel businesses in the city also welcome and send many tourists to and from, and these travel businesses are increasingly investing in infrastructure and technical facilities.
However, besides those developments, Hai Phong tourism also has shortcomings. The management of tourist areas and tourist attractions is still lacking in unity and concentration. Although the infrastructure and technical facilities have been invested, they are still not at a high level, so there are still many unfinished and unplanned facilities, which reduces the beauty of tourist destinations and affects the natural environment. Although the means of transport have been upgraded, compared to major tourist centers such as Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh City, etc., they are still not high-class. The wharfs have not been specifically planned, and many tourist ships to Hai Phong still do not have a berth. There are not many international tour guides, and domestic tour guides are still limited in foreign languages. Therefore, in order for tourism activities in Hai Phong to develop more and more and meet the needs of tourists, Hai Phong city and Hai Phong Department of Tourism need to have more measures to plan and develop tourism.
Chapter 1 Summary
Through analyzing and evaluating tourism potential, current tourism activities and tourism directions and strategies of Hai Phong, we can see that the role of tourism activities in Hai Phong is very important in the development of the city.
In general, Hai Phong is a city with a geographical location, natural and human tourism resources, economic and social conditions... quite favorable for tourism development. However, the thesis is limited in length, so it focuses on some unique and impressive relics and architectural works with high educational and aesthetic value to give tourists an overview and insight into the tourism picture of Hai Phong.
Chapter 2:
INVESTIGATION AND ASSESSMENT OF THE ATTRACTION OF HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL RELICS IN HAI PHONG CITY AND THE CURRENT STATE OF TOURISM ACTIVITIES THERE
2.1. The attractiveness of historical and cultural relics in Hai Phong city:
2.2. 1. Concept of attractiveness :
Attractiveness in tourism is a new issue, up to now there is no specific concept, it is very difficult to define and there are many issues that need further research. However, we can understand attractiveness in tourism as follows:
Attractiveness in tourism is the resources that attract tourists to tourist attractions, tourist areas and tourist regions... It is comprehensive and is often determined by the value of tourism resources, the way to organize and manage conservation activities, embellishment, exploitation of resources, human resources; facilities, tourism services and other factors.
2.1.1.1. The role of attractiveness:
Attractiveness, especially the attractiveness of tourism resources, plays an important role in tourism development, and is the main purpose of tourists' trips. Attractive tourist spots, tourist areas and tourist regions... will retain tourists longer, prolong their stay, stimulate them to consume more tourism products, and make them come back.
2.1.1.2. Characteristics and conditions that create attractiveness:
* Characteristic :
- Attractiveness is the most important factor in tourism development, because tourists only come to tourist destinations, tourist areas, tourist regions... that they see have tourism development resources that attract them, and the essence of tourism activities is to "sell" satisfaction to customers.
- Attractiveness is highly synthetic, because it is created by many factors: natural factors of tourism resources (the values that those resources bring), business status factors, tourism environment (management apparatus and methods, conservation, restoration, exploitation of resources, human resources, tourism facilities, etc.), customer factors (age, level, occupation, interests, ethnic composition, cultural traditions, etc.).
- Attractiveness cannot be measured quantitatively. It can only be determined qualitatively through research on tourist preferences.
- Determining the attractiveness of human tourism resources is more complicated than that of natural tourism resources. Because the evaluation criteria are mainly based on qualitative emotional and intuitive basis.
- The attractiveness of tourism development is not fixed but constant. It is easily lost without regular, scientific and correct investment.
* Conditions to create attraction :
- Subjective conditions : are the intrinsic values of tourism resources.
+ For natural tourism resources, the attraction is created by the beauty of the landscape, the diversity of the terrain, the suitability of the climate, the uniqueness and distinctiveness of natural phenomena and relics...
The attractiveness of a point, a region, an area can be assessed according to the following levels:
1. Very attractive: there are 4 natural phenomena on 5 diverse landscapes (on the mountain top, the heights on the mountain, waterfalls, caves, lakes, beaches...)
2. Quite attractive: has 3 to 5 diverse beautiful landscapes, has a unique natural phenomenon or relic, meets 3 to 5 types of tourism.
3. Average: has 1 to 2 beautiful landscapes, meeting 1 to 2 types of tourism.
4. Less attractive: Monotonous landscape, catering to one type of tourism.
And just like human tourism resources, natural tourism resources can also be evaluated by scoring:
1. Has a favorable position: 4 x 2 = 8 points.
2. Has geological tectonic history and terrain structure: 4 x 2 = 8 points.
3. Has beautiful scenery, large scale combined with many valuable resources: 4 x 2 = 8 points.
4. Has rich water and biological resources: 4 x 2 = 8 points.
5. Good natural environment and still retains its original values: 4 x 2 = 8 points.
6. The advertising campaign was well conducted: 4 x 2 = 8 points.
7. Natural tourist area is evaluated as an international tourist destination: 4 x 2 = 8 points.
+ For human tourism resources, the attraction is created by values that can be felt when seen (aesthetic value, architectural and artistic value...) or after hearing (historical value, cultural value...)
The assessment of historical and cultural relics can be conducted by scoring:
Density of relics/province
Number of moves volume/ 100km2 | Number of ranked monuments | Meaning | |||||
Characteristic | Rating Level | Characteristic | Rating Level | Characteristic | Rating Level | Characteristic | Rating Level |
Under 400 | 4 | >10 | 4 | >40 | 4 | International | 4 |
301 – 400 | 3 | 5 – 10 | 3 | 21 – 40 | 3 | International | 3 |
150 – 300 | 2 | 1 – 4 | 2 | 5 – 25 | 2 | Region | 2 |
<150 | 1 | <1 | 1 | <5 | 1 | Inland | 1 |
(Source: Pham Trung Luong, Vietnam Tourism Resources and Environment, Education Publishing House, 2000 )
In which: good (4 points), fair (3 points), average (2 points), poor (1 point). And according to the above coefficient, it can be evaluated as follows:
1. Very convenient location: 4 x 2 = 8 points
2. History of formation and development over 500 years: 4 x2 = 8 points
3. Has beautiful scenery, large scale combined with many valuable resources: 4 x 3 = 12 points
4. Interior of construction items are well preserved, renovated and protected: 4 x 3 = 12 points
5. Unique architectural location: 4 x 3 = 12 points
6. The organization of restoration, protection and exploitation is carried out well and according to the principles: 4 x 3 = 12 points
7. Associating money with unique cultural values (honoring those who have contributed to the country or saints associated with the formation of a legend or religion), and places where major festivals take place: 4 x 2 = 8 points
8. Good quality natural and human environment, not damaged: 4 x 2 = 8 points
9. Research on propaganda and advertising is well conducted: 4 x 2 = 8 points
10. Internationally ranked relics: 4 x 3 = 12 points
- Objective conditions: are factors external to tourism resources but contribute to the formation, preservation and promotion of the attractiveness of tourism resources.
+ Policy: Correct and suitable policy is also an important factor in increasing attractiveness to tourists, because it is the premise for tourism development.
+ Socio-economic conditions: Economic development creates favorable conditions for investment in technical infrastructure for tourism. A stable political and social environment is also a factor attracting tourists, especially in the current unstable socio-political situation.
+ The apparatus and methods of organizing management, conservation, restoration and exploitation of resources: the values of tourism resources only truly become attractive to tourists





