Table 3.6. Evaluation of the difference in growth indicators between the studied OTCs in Tien Ky town
Growth index
D 1.3 (cm) | D t (m) | H vn (m) | Length (m ) | |
Standard cell TK01 | ||||
Medium | 13.18 | 2.71 | 9.62 | 4.18 |
Standard error (S) | 3.38 | 0.81 | 0.70 | 1.24 |
Variance (S 2 ) | 11.43 | 0.65 | 0.49 | 1.53 |
Coefficient of variation (S%) | 25.65 | 29.89 | 7.28 | 29.60 |
Standard cell TK02 | ||||
Medium | 12.35 | 2.41 | 9.99 | 4.59 |
Standard error (S) | 1.92 | 0.29 | 0.59 | 0.89 |
Variance (S 2 ) | 3.67 | 0.09 | 0.34 | 0.79 |
Coefficient of variation (S%) | 15.52 | 12.20 | 5.87 | 19.33 |
Standard cell TK03 | ||||
Medium | 13.42 | 2.43 | 10.08 | 4.76 |
Standard error (S) | 1.79 | 0.30 | 0.52 | 0.69 |
Variance (S 2 ) | 3.21 | 0.09 | 0.27 | 0.48 |
Coefficient of variation (S%) | 13.36 | 12.52 | 5.18 | 14.56 |
Maybe you are interested!
-
Identify Rating Levels and Rating Scales
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism,quan lan,quang ninh,ecology,ecotourism,minh chau,van don,geography,geographical basis,tourism development,science
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
of the islanders. Therefore, this indicator will be divided into two sub-indicators:
a1. Natural tourism attractiveness a2. Cultural tourism attractiveness
b. Tourist capacity
The two island communes in Quan Lan have different capacities to receive tourists. Minh Chau Commune is home to many standard hotels and resorts, attracting high-income domestic and international tourists. Meanwhile, Quan Lan Commune has many motels mainly built and operated by local people, so the scale and quality are not high, and will be suitable for ordinary tourists such as students.
c. Time of exploitation of Quan Lan Island Commune:
Quan Lan tourism is seasonal due to weather and climate conditions and festivals only take place on certain days of the year, specifically in spring. In Quan Lan commune, the period from April to June and from September to November is considered the best time to visit Quan Lan because the cultural tourism activities are mainly associated with festivals taking place during this time.
Minh Chau island commune:
Tourism exploitation time is all year round, because this is a place with a number of tourist attractions with diverse ecosystems such as Bai Tu Long National Park Research Center, Tram forest, Turtle Laying Beach, so besides coming to the beach for tourism and vacation in the summer, Minh Chau will attract research groups to come for tourism combined with research at other times of the year.
d. Sustainability
The sustainability of ecotourism sites in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes depends on the sensitivity of the ecosystems to climate changes.
landscape. In general, these tourist destinations have a fairly high level of sustainability, because they are natural ecosystems, planned and protected. However, if a large number of tourists gather at certain times, it can exceed the carrying capacity and affect the sustainability of the environment (polluted beaches, damaged trees, animals moving away from their habitats, etc.), then the sustainability of the above ecosystems (natural ecosystems, human ecosystems) will also be affected and become less sustainable.
e. Location and accessibility
Both island communes have ports to take tourists to visit from Van Don wharf:
- Quan Lan – Van Don traffic route:
Phuc Thinh – Viet Anh high-speed boat and Quang Minh high-speed boat, depart at 8am and 2pm from Van Don to Quan Lan, and at 7am and 1pm from Quan Lan to Van Don. There are also wooden boats departing at 7am and 1pm.
- Van Don - Minh Chau traffic route:
Chung Huong high-speed train, Minh Chau train, morning 7:30 and afternoon 13:30 from Van Don to Minh Chau, morning 6:30 and afternoon 13:00 from Minh Chau to Van Don.
f. Infrastructure
Despite receiving investment attention, the issue of infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism on Quan Lan Island is still an issue that needs to be resolved because it has a direct impact on the implementation of ecotourism activities. The minimum conditions for serving tourists such as accommodation, electricity, water, communication, especially medical services, and security work need to be given top priority. Ecotourism spots in Minh Chau commune are assessed to have better infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism because there are quite complete and synchronous conditions for serving tourists, meeting many needs of domestic and foreign tourists.
3.2.1.4. Determine assessment levels and assessment scales
Corresponding to the levels of each criterion, the index is the score of those levels in the order of 4, 3, 2, 1 decreasing according to the standard of each level: very attractive (4), attractive (3), average (2), less attractive (1).
3.2.1.5. Determining the coefficients of the criteria
For the assessment of DLST in the two communes of Quan Lan and Minh Chau islands, the students added evaluation coefficients to show the importance of the criteria and indicators as follows:
Coefficient 3 with criteria: Attractiveness, Exploitation time. These are the 2 most important criteria for attracting tourists to tourism in general and eco-tourism in particular, so they have the highest coefficient.
Coefficient 2 with criteria: Capacity, Infrastructure, Location and accessibility . Because the assessment area is an island commune of Van Don district, the above criteria are selected by the author with appropriate coefficients at the average level.
Coefficient 1 with criteria: Sustainability. Quan Lan has natural and human-made ecotourism sites, with high biodiversity and little impact from local human factors. Most of the ecotourism sites are still wild, so they are highly sustainable.
3.2.1.6. Results of DLST assessment on Quan Lan island
a. Assessment of the potential for natural tourism development
For Minh Chau commune:
+ Natural tourism attractiveness is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined as average (2 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of Capacity criterion is 2 x 2 = 4.
+ Exploitation time is long (4 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Exploitation time criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is assessed as good (3 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 3 x 2 = 6 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Minh Chau commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 4 + 12 + 4 + 4 + 6 = 42 points
Similar assessment for Quan Lan commune, we have the following table:
Table 3.3: Assessment of the potential for natural ecotourism development in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of self-tourismof course
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
CommuneMinh Chau
12
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
42/52
Quan CommuneLan
6
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
33/52
b. Assessment of the potential for humanistic tourism development
For Quan Lan commune:
+ The attractiveness of human tourism is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined to be large (3 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Capacity criterion is 3 x 2 = 6.
+ Mining time is average (3 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Mining time criterion is 3 x 3 = 9.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points.
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is rated as average (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Quan Lan commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 6 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 4 = 36 points.
Similar assessment with Minh Chau commune we have the following table:
Table 3.4: Assessment of the potential for developing humanistic eco-tourism in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of human tourismliterature
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Quan CommuneLan
12
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
39/52
Minh CommuneChau
6
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
36/52
Basically, both Minh Chau and Quan Lan localities have quite favorable conditions for developing ecotourism. However, Quan Lan commune has more advantages to develop ecotourism in a humanistic direction, because this is an area with many famous historical relics such as Quan Lan Communal House, Quan Lan Pagoda, Temple worshiping the hero Tran Khanh Du, ... along with local festivals held annually such as the wind praying ceremony (March 15), Quan Lan festival (June 10-19); due to its location near the port and long exploitation time, the beaches in Quan Lan commune (especially Quan Lan beach) are no longer hygienic and clean to ensure the needs of tourists coming to relax and swim; this is also an area with many beautiful landscapes such as Got Beo wind pass, Ong Phong head, Voi Voi cave, but the ability to access these places is still very limited (dirt hill road, lots of gravel and rocks), especially during rainy and windy times; In addition, other natural resources such as mangrove forests and sea worms have not been really exploited for tourism purposes and ecotourism development. On the contrary, Minh Chau commune has more advantages in developing ecotourism in the direction of natural tourism, this is an area with diverse ecosystems such as at Rua De Beach, Bai Tu Long National Park Conservation Center...; Minh Chau beach is highly appreciated for its natural beauty and cleanliness, ranked in the top ten most beautiful beaches in Vietnam; Minh Chau commune is also home to Tram forest with a large area and a purity of up to 90%, suitable for building bridges through the forest (a very effective type of natural ecotourism currently applied by many countries) for tourists to sightsee, as well as for the purpose of studying and researching.
Figure 3.1: Thenmala Forest Bridge (India) Source: https://www.thenmalaecotourism.com/(August 21, 2019)
3.2.2. Using SWOT matrix to evaluate Quan Lan island tourism
General assessment of current tourism activities of Quan Lan island is shown through the following SWOT matrix:
Table 3.5: SWOT matrix evaluating tourism activities on Quan Lan island
Internal agent
Strengths- There is a lot of potential for tourism development, especially natural ecotourism and humanistic ecotourism.- The unskilled labor force is relatively abundant.- resource environmentunpolluted, still
Weaknesses- Poorly developed infrastructure, especially traffic routes to tourist destinations on the island.- The team of professional staff is still weak.- Tourism products in general
quite wild, originalintact
general and DLST in particularalone is monotonous.
External agents
Opportunity- Tourism is a key industry in the socio-economic development strategy of the province and Van Don economic zone.- Quan Lan was selected as a pilot area for eco-tourism development within the framework of the green growth project between Quang Ninh province and the Japanese organization JICA.- The flow of tourists and especially ecotourism in the world tends toincreasing
Challenge- Weather and climate change abnormally.- Competition in tourism products is increasingly fierce, especially with other localities in the province such as Ha Long, Mong Cai...- Awareness of tourists, especially domestic tourists, about ecotourism and nature conservation is not high.
Through summary analysis using SWOT matrix we see that:
To exploit strengths and take advantage of opportunities, it is necessary to:
- Diversify products and service types (build more tourism routes aimed at specific needs of tourists: experiential tourism immersed in nature, spiritual cultural tourism...)
- Effective exploitation of resources and differentiated products (natural resources and human resources)
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: #0D0D0D; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -3pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Symbol, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:Wingdings; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:Cambria, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: #212121; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
Study on the influence of soil environment on the growth and development of Aquilaria crassna - 12 -
Evaluation Results of Quality Indicators and Importance of Each Indicator -
VPBank's Credit Growth Compared to the Whole System -
Evaluation of the effect of DH fertilizer on growth, yield and quality of some fruit trees at Thai Nguyen University of Agriculture and Forestry - 2

U TK12 | (OTC TK01 and TK02)
1.17 | 1.89 | 2.24 | 1.47 | |
|U TK13 | (OTC TK01 and TK03) | 0.34 | 1.75 | 2.91 | 2.23 |
|U TK23 | (OTC TK02 and TK03) | 2.23 | 0.26 | 0.63 | 0.81 |
In Tien Ky town area, the difference in size of Do Bau in the three standard plots is not as obvious as in Tien Canh, but the difference is larger than that of Do Bau in Tien Hiep commune. Regarding the diameter at breast height (D 1.3 ) between
There is a clear difference between plots 02 and 03 (|U| = 2.23 > 1.96). Regarding tree height: between plots 01 and 02, plots 01 and 03 there is a clear difference. Comparing the height below the branches of Do Bau in plot 01 with plot 03 shows that there is also a clear difference (see figure 3.4).
Figure 3.4. Comparison of growth characteristics of Do Bau in three standard plots in Tien Ky town
3.2. Results of investigation on basic soil characteristics in the study area
3.2.1. Physical characteristics of soil in the study area
Soil factors, soil thickness is one of the site factors, it is the space for distributing the root system of plants, is the storehouse of nutrients, is the source of moisture for plants. Soil thickness reflects the weathering process of materials (parent rocks, minerals and soil formation process), it reflects the level of soil erosion, vegetation living on it. Researching the influence of soil type, soil thickness... on the growth of Do Bau trees is the basis for determining suitable site conditions.
According to research results, the soil for growing Aquilaria crassna is 50 - 100 cm thick. Some other physical characteristics are shown in Table 3.7.
Table 3.7. Soil mechanical composition in the study area
Mechanical composition according to FAO % | Classify | |||
OTC | < 0.002 | 0.002-0.02 | 0.02-2 | |
A | Tien Ky area | |||
TK01 | 25.25 | 48.54 | 26.21 | TB Clay |
TK02 | 30.37 | 42.87 | 26.76 | TB Clay |
TK03 | 33.89 | 44.30 | 21.81 | TB Clay |
B | Tien Hiep commune area | |||
TH01 | 29.02 | 45.87 | 25.11 | TB Clay |
TH02 | 26.46 | 46.21 | 27.33 | TB Clay |
TH03 | 24.31 | 43.79 | 30.90 | TB Clay |
C | Tien Canh commune area | |||
TC01 | 27.13 | 42.26 | 30.61 | TB Clay |
TC02 | 31.42 | 47.66 | 20.92 | TB Clay |
TC03 | 28.71 | 46.35 | 24.94 | TB Clay |
Soil mechanical composition factors between study areas did not show clear differences.
In TC01 area, trees grow on bare ground with flat terrain. In TC02 area, trees are grown on terrain with a fairly small slope < 5. In TC 03 area, trees are grown on hills with a slope > 10. In both areas, the vegetation grows strongly with many types of grasses and shrubs.
The soil in Tien Hiep commune has a brown surface, areas TK02 and TK03 have high humidity, the ground cover is strongly developed with many types of shrubs. Area TK01 has no ground cover so the soil is mixed with rocks and gravel.
In Tien Ky town area, all 3 research standard plots have Do Bau trees planted on bare ground without the growth of vegetation. The soil is brown and mixed with gravel.
3.2.2. Chemical characteristics of soil in the study area
Humus or organic matter in the soil is an important indicator of soil fertility, it has a decisive effect on the physical, chemical and biological properties of the soil. According to the results of soil analysis of the research areas, it can be assessed that the humus content in the soil in the forests planted with Aquilaria trees is at an average level (in areas TK01, TK01, TK03, TC01, TC02) or quite good (in areas TH01, TH02, TH03, TC03).
Total nitrogen content is average. However, available nitrogen (including mineral nitrogen and some easily decomposable organic nitrogen that plants can absorb) is only at a poor level of <4mg/100g of soil.
Total Phosphorus content in different areas shows clear differentiation. In Tien Ky area, total available Phosphorus is only poor (%P2O5 0.03 -0.06) to average (%P2O5 0.06 - 0.1). Meanwhile, soil in Tien Canh has rich total Phosphorus content (%P2O5>0.1). In Tien Hiep area, total Phosphorus level of Tien Hiep area has quite large difference at the research sites.
The content of easily digestible phosphorus in Tien Ky town area is very low <5mg/100g. While in Tien Canh it is quite high >10mg/100g.
3.3. Relationship between some basic characteristics of soil and Aquilaria tree
3.3.1. Relationship between soil and growth and development of Aquilaria crassna
Table 3.8. Results of soil analysis for growing Aquilaria crassna
Area
Humus (%) | Total Phosphorus mg/kg | Available phosphorus P 2 O 5 (mg/kg) | Total Nitrogen %N | Nitrogen is readily available. mg/100g | |
A. Tien Ky Town | |||||
TK01 | 2.66 | 145.69 | 61.0 | 0.111 | 1.61 |
TK02 | 2.98 | 194.59 | 31.1 | 0.111 | 1.12 |
TK03 | 1.86 | 279.46 | 44.1 | 0.103 | 1.89 |
TB_TK | 2.50 | 206.58 | 45.40 | 0.11 | 1.54 |
B. Tien Hiep Commune | |||||
TH01 | 3.27 | 848.33 | 118.4 | 0.145 | 2.31 |
TH02 | 3.42 | 329.35 | 58.5 | 0.142 | 1.89 |
TH03 | 4.57 | 147.45 | 44.1 | 0.150 | 1.54 |
TB_TH | 3.75 | 441.71 | 51.29 | 0.15 | 1.72 |
C. Tien Canh Commune | |||||
TC01 | 2.65 | 0.00 | 132.9 | 0.125 | 2.10 |
TC02 | 2.68 | 461.80 | 293.2 | 0.117 | 1.33 |
TC03 | 3.79 | 436.54 | 91.5 | 0.139 | 0.91 |
TB_TC | 3.04 | 299.44 | 172.54 | 0.13 | 1.45 |
3.3.1.1. Effect of humus content on the growth of Aquilaria crassna
Data related to humus content and growth characteristics of Aquilaria crassna are shown in Table 3.9.
Table 3.9 shows: Humus content in standard plots ranges from 1.86% (standard plot TK03 - Tien Ky town) to 4.57% (standard plot TH03 - Tien Hiep commune). On average, humus content on Do Bau land in Tien Ky town is lowest (2.50%), in Tien Hiep commune is highest (3.57%). Difference
This deviation is considered to be negligible. Preliminary observation of two related data series
Table 3.9. Humus content and growth characteristics of Do Bau tree
OTC
D 1.3 (cm) | D t (m) | H vn (m) | Length (m ) | Body number | Humus (%) | |
A. Tien Ky Town | ||||||
TK01 | 13.18 | 2.71 | 9.62 | 4.18 | 1 | 2.66 |
TK02 | 12.35 | 2.41 | 9.99 | 4.59 | 1 | 2.98 |
TK03 | 13.42 | 2.43 | 10.1 | 4.76 | 1 | 1.86 |
TB_TK | 13 | 2.5 | 9.9 | 4.5 | 1 | 2.50 |
B. Tien Hiep Commune | ||||||
TH01 | 13.6 | 2.3 | 8.5 | 3.9 | 1 | 3.27 |
TH02 | 11.9 | 2.3 | 8.1 | 4 | 1 | 3.42 |
TH03 | 12.0 | 2.4 | 8.3 | 4 | 1 | 4.57 |
TB_TH | 12.5 | 2.3 | 8.3 | 4 | 1 | 3.75 |
C. Tien Canh Commune | ||||||
TC01 | 23.2 | 5.3 | 13.1 | 4.9 | 1 | 2.65 |
TC02 | 19.1 | 3.8 | 12.5 | 4.4 | 1 | 2.68 |
TC03 | 19.3 | 3.7 | 12.5 | 4.2 | 1 | 3.79 |
TB_TC | 20.6 | 4.2 | 12.7 | 4.5 | 1 | 3.04 |
to diameter at breast height (D1.3), and humus content showed that there seemed to be an inverse relationship. However, statistical testing showed that there was no correlation between humus content and growth parameters such as tree diameter and height.
Relationship
R | R2 | F | |
Humus – D 1.3 | 0.196480518 | 0.038604594 | 0.281083263 |
Humus – D canopy | 0.188850923 | 0.035664671 | 0.258885775 |
Humus – H vn | 0.332720491 | 0.110702925 | 0.871385389 |
Humus – H dc | 0.686367125 | 0.47109983 | 6,235011814 |
There is a first-order correlation between humus content and branch height (H dc ): H dc = - 0.313647068 * %Humidity + 5.297167712
with R = 0.69 (R 2 = 0.47, F = 6.24).
3.3.1.2 Effect of phosphorus on the growth of Aquilaria crassna
A. Total phosphorus
Three parameters related to the “total phosphorus” index were determined: phosphorus content in mg/kg, total phosphorus percentage and phosphorus percentage as P 2 O 5 . The data are shown in Table 3.10
Table 3.10. Growth characteristics of Do Bau and total phosphorus of the varieties
standard plots in the study area
OTC
D 1.3 | D t | H vn | H dc | Total Phosphorus | |
(cm) | (m) | (m) | (m) | mg/kg | |
A. Tien Ky Town | |||||
TK01 | 13.18 | 2.71 | 9.62 | 4.18 | 145.69 |
TK02 | 12.35 | 2.41 | 9.99 | 4.59 | 194.59 |
TK03 | 13.42 | 2.43 | 10.08 | 4.76 | 279.46 |
TB_TK | 13 | 2.5 | 9.9 | 4.5 | 206.58 |
B. Tien Hiep Commune | |||||
TH01 | 13.6 | 2.3 | 8.5 | 3.9 | 848.33 |
TH02 | 11.9 | 2.3 | 8.1 | 4 | 329.35 |
TH03
12 | 2.4 | 8.3 | 4 | 147.45 | |
TB_TH | 12.5 | 2.3 | 8.3 | 4 | 441.71 |
C. Tien Canh Commune | |||||
TC01 | 23.2 | 5.3 | 13.1 | 4.9 | 0.00 |
TC02 | 19.1 | 3.8 | 12.5 | 4.4 | 461.80 |
TC03 | 19.3 | 3.7 | 12.5 | 4.2 | 436.54 |
TB_TC | 20.6 | 4.2 | 12.7 | 4.5 | 299.44 |
Examination of the relationship of total phosphorus parameters with plant growth characteristics showed no clear relationship.
Total Relationship P
R | R2 | F | |
mg/kg - D 1.3 | 0.130807329 | 0.017110557 | 0.121858976 |
mg/kg - D | 0.324773261 | 0.105477671 | 0.825405555 |
mg/kg - H vn | 0.204439159 | 0.04179537 | 0.305328924 |
mg/kg - H dc | 0.541980423 | 0.293742779 | 2.911403086 |
As in the case of humus content, there is a relatively close correlation between total phosphorus (mg/kg) and branch height:
H dc = - 0.000781446 * P (mg/kg) + 4.572423766
B. Easily digestible phosphorus
Available phosphorus exists in the form of P-PO 4 3 - (mg/kg) and P 2 O 5 (mg/kg) and the growth characteristics of Aquilaria are shown in Table 3.11. Observing the data, it can be seen that the higher the amount of available phosphorus, the better the plant grows. Therefore, it is necessary to check the correlation between phosphorus and the growth of Aquilaria.





