Home / Corporation

Evaluation Results of Quality Indicators and Importance of Each Indicator



Appendix 1

APPENDIX


SURVEY PROCESSING RESULTS

On the quality of human resources of PVN

1. Survey purpose

- Get experts' opinions on criteria for evaluating the quality of PVN's human resources;

- Grasp the overall quality of PVN's human resources, by gender, by field of operation;

2. Subject of investigation

The survey subjects include officers and employees of PVN's units from the Board of Directors to affiliated units, according to age, job position, working time in the industry..., specifically as follows:

First, about age:

- The survey subjects under 25 years old account for 2.4%

- The survey subjects from 25 to 35 years old accounted for 60.7%

- The survey subjects from 35 to 50 years old accounted for 30.8%

- The survey subjects over 50 years old account for 6.1%

Second, about gender: Male accounts for 62.5%; Female accounts for 37.5%

Third, about the current field of work: Oil and gas exploration and exploitation accounts for 9.6%, Petrochemicals and oil and gas production accounts for 18.8%.

Research and training in the industry account for 21.9%

Other fields such as trade, services, finance... account for 49.7%

Fourth, about job position:

- General Corporation leaders: 0.3%

- Company leaders account for 0.3%

- Department leaders account for 27.5%

- Consulting and assisting accounts for 0.7%

- Specialists and employees account for 71.2%

Fifth, about working time in PVN:

- 3 years or less accounts for 14.5%

- From 4 to 10 years accounts for 60.5%

- From 11 to 20 years accounts for 19.6%


- Over 20 years accounts for 5.4%. Sixth, about training level: Postgraduate accounts for 32%.

University accounts for 65% College accounts for 1.7% Secondary accounts for 1.0%

Seventh, in terms of expertise, oil and gas exploration and exploitation accounts for 19%, petrochemicals and oil and gas production accounts for 7.8%.

Research and training in the industry account for 20%

Other fields: Human resources organization 14.6%; Accounting 8.3%; Administration, union, office 8.8%; Electricity, automation 9.3%; Safety 7.3%; Commerce 4.9%, accounting for 53.2%.

Seventh, about training schools, 67.2% of respondents answered about training schools, specifically :

- Polytechnic University 27.6%

- University of Natural Sciences 6.5%

- University of Mining and Geology 7.0%

- University of Economics 12.1%

- Academy of Finance 4.0%

- Foreign 5%

- Other schools 37.7%

3. Evaluation results of quality indicators and the importance of each indicator

Number of votes received: 296 votes

Synthesized and analyzed using SPSS software, the following results were obtained:

Table PL 1.1 - Importance of quality assessment criteria

oil and gas human resources

Unit: %


Target

Level of importance

of the indicators

1

2

3

4

5

1. General level

41.9

41.2

11.5

4.7

0.7

Maybe you are interested!

Evaluation Results of Quality Indicators and Importance of Each Indicator



- Training certificate

22.0

41.9

28.7

6.8

0.7

- Knowledge, understanding

55.1

32.8

5.1

3.7

3.4

2. General capacity

47.8

38.3

7.1

5.1

1.7

- Competence, professional skills

58.0

28.8

6.1

3.7

3.4

- Complementary skills and abilities

25.5

45.9

22.1

4.8

1.7

3. Ethics, general qualities

54.4

29.4

10.1

5.4

0.7

- Professional ethics

50.7

31.8

10.5

6.1

1.0

- Organization and discipline

52.2

31.5

9.8

3.7

2.7

3. Health

39.2

40.6

12.6

4.9

2.8

4. Level of task completion

56.3

29.7

5.9

4.9

3.1

Notes : (1) - very important, (2) Important, 3 Normal, 4 Less important, (5) not important

4. Regarding the level of job suitability with training, 98.3% of respondents answered the question, specifically:

Very suitable 12%; Suitable 65.6%; Relatively suitable 20.6%; Not suitable 1.7%

Assessment of the level of suitability in human resource arrangement at PVN units compared to training majors:

Below 50% accounts for 4.55; From 50% to 75% accounts for 55.1%; Over 75% accounts for

40.4 %

5. Level, needs, and aspirations for improving the capacity of the research subjects

Firstly, the level of knowledge and skills satisfaction, 99.3% of respondents answered, specific results: Good response 32.3%; Satisfied 59.9%; Partially satisfied 7.5%; Not satisfied 0.3%

Second, regarding the need for professional training and development, 99.3% of respondents responded, specifically: Very necessary 14.6%; Necessary 74.5%; Not really necessary 10.5%; Unnecessary 0.3%.

In which the level of training and development required:

Postgraduate 51.8%; University 9.9%; College 1.1%; Other 37.3%

Knowledge required for training : Professional knowledge, main occupation 63.2

% ; Additional knowledge 64.2%

Desire to be trained and develop skills:

- Professional skills account for 28.4%


- Support skills 31.4 %

- Both professional skills and supporting skills account for 31.4%

6. Assessment of the capacity of leaders and managers in units

Table PL1.2 - Assessment of the level of competency and qualifications of unit management and leadership staff

Unit: %


TT

Evaluation criteria

Rating Level

( 1 is very good and 5 is poor )



1

2

3

4

5

1.

Qualifications, knowledge :

44.3

38.8

11.3

4.8

0.7

In there :

- Qualifications, professional knowledge

41.6

40.2

12.4

3.4

2.1

- Qualifications, additional knowledge

32.9

47.2

14.0

4.2

1.4

2.

Capacity, skills :

37.8

42.6

15.8

3.1

0.7

Including : - Professional skills

main

41.2

39.1

14.0

3.6

1.8

- Teamwork skills

38.9

38.5

16.3

5.6

0.3

- Foreign language

28.7

43.6

20.8

4.2

2.4

- Information technology

24.3

40.1

30.3

2.8

1.1

3

Ethics, behavior :

50.2

35.4

9.3

3.8

1.4

Including : - Professional ethics

49.5

35.4

10.2

3.2

1.8

- Sense of discipline

50.5

31.5

13.1

3.5

1.4

- Industrial style

47.4

34.7

12.0

4.1

1.7

4

Health

40.8

41.5

12.9

2.8

2.1

5

Creativity

36.4

44.1

12.2

5.6

1.7

(Note: Level 1 is very good; 2 - good, 3 - normal, 4 - not good, 5 - poor)

7. Situation of training and development of staff

Firstly, regarding the level of units regularly organizing or sending people for training, 98.6% of respondents responded, of which: Regularly 56.8%; Occasionally 40.1%; Very rarely 3.1%; Never 0%

The practicality of training and development, 97.3% of respondents answered:

Very practical 18.8%; Practical 74.7%; Less practical 6.6%; Not practical 0%


Second, training and development situation in the last 5 years:

Regarding training and professional development, 99.7% of respondents responded, specifically:

Never 41.7%; From 1 to 4 times: 46.4%; From 5 to 10 times: 11.6%;

Over 10 times 0.3%

Regarding Training and supplementary knowledge development, 99.7% of responses were positive, including:

Never 24.7%; From 1 to 4 times: 56.5%; From 5 to 10 times: 18.7%;

Reasons for participating in training: Due to unit requirements 41.9%; To increase salary 69.9%; Due to job requirements 1.4%; For promotion 20.6%; Due to interest in science 6.8%

Regarding the level of application of training and development knowledge to work, 95.6% of respondents answered, of which: Fully applied 6.7%; Mostly applied 65.7%; Little applied 26.5%; Unable to apply 1.1%.

Reasons for not being able to apply: Lack of skills 12.8%; Lack of resources and means 21.3%; Unable to apply personally 1.7%; Other reasons 0.3%

8. Regarding recruitment and personnel arrangement

First, opinions on recruiting staff at the units:

Transparency: Good 72.9%; Not really good 25.6%; Not really good 1.4% Ensuring scientificity: Good 65.5%; Not really good 33.3%; Not really good 1.2% Ensuring democracy: Good 69.3%; Not really good 28.7%; Not really good 2.0%

Second, opinions on personnel arrangement and use in units have 98.6% of responses:

Very suitable: 8.9%; Suitable: 77.4%; Not very suitable: 13.7%; Unsuitable: 0%

Regarding the assessment of individual job arrangement, 97.3% answered: Very suitable: 13.5%; Suitable: 79.9%; Not really suitable: 6.6%; Unsuitable: 0%

9. Evaluation of working environment and benefits and policies

First , comments on the working environment:

Unit: %


Evaluation criteria

Rating Level

( 1 is very good; 5 is poor )


1

2

3

4

5

Working atmosphere

35.5

41.0

17.9

4.5

1.0

Solidarity and mutual support

32.6

44.9

16.5

4.6

1.4

Facility Guarantee

40.4

41.8

13.3

3.5

1.1

(Note: 1 Very good, 2 Good, 3 Normal, 4 Not good, 5 Poor


Second , comments on the treatment regime:

About salary: Suitable 66.1%; Not really suitable 33.2%; Not suitable 0.7%

About bonus: Suitable 68.2%; Not really suitable 31.1%; Not suitable

0.7 %

Regarding other benefits: Suitable 75.2%; Not really suitable 24.8%; Not suitable

0% match

Proposals for salary increase, bonus increase, and welfare increase: Salary increase 29.4%; Bonus increase 29.4%; Welfare increase 15.9%

Individual opinions on salary, bonus, benefits:

Salary: Suitable 72.0%; Not suitable 28.0% Bonus: Suitable 72.7%; Not suitable 27.3% Benefits: Suitable 82.3%; Not suitable 17.7%

Regarding the proposal to increase salary, there were 69 people (23.3%), of which: Proposing to increase 10% - 20% had 36.2% of opinions; increasing from 21% - 40% had 30.3% of opinions; increasing from 41% - 100% had 26% of opinions; increasing over 100% had 1.4% of opinions.

Regarding the proposal to increase the bonus, there were 49 people (16.6%), of which: Proposing to increase by 10% - 20% had 28.5% of opinions; increasing from 21% -40%: 46.8% had opinions; increasing from 41% - 100% had 36.7% of opinions; increasing over 100% had 2.0% of opinions.

10. On evaluating staff at units

- Regarding the evaluation organization: 98% of the opinions responded, with the following results: Regularly 21.4%; Periodically 70.7%; Very rarely 7.9%.

- Regarding the evaluation results, 91.6% of opinions responded, with the following results: Practical 53.5%; Formal 32.1%; Serving emulation 14.4%.

- Regarding the evaluation method, 87.2% of the opinions responded, with the following results: Scientific 64.3%; Emotional 34.5%; Non-objective 1.2%.


11. Measures to improve human resource quality at oil and gas units Table PL 1.3 - Proposed measures to improve human resource quality

force at the units

Unit: %


TT

Target

Level of need

1

2

3

4

5

1.

Improve quality criteria

48.3

42.1

5.9

2.1

1.7


Improve knowledge and skills :

49.2

40.5

7.2

2.1

1.0

- Qualifications, professional knowledge

56.3

33.1

6.3

1.8

2.5

- Qualifications, additional knowledge

33.1

51.1

10.8

3.6

1.4

Improve capacity and skills :

54.6

34.5

5.2

4.0

1.7

Including : - Professional skills

main

59.2

31.7

4.5

1.9

2.6

- Teamwork skills

42.9

45.0

7.1

3.9

1.0

- Foreign language

39.4

42.9

12.1

3.2

2.5

- Information technology

28.0

47.6

17.5

5.5

1.5

Ethics, behavior :

49.0

38.8

7.7

3.1

1.5

Including : - Professional ethics

51.8

35.4

8.4

2.9

1.5

- Sense of discipline

51.6

35.1

8.8

2.5

2.1

- Industrial style

48.9

39.1

7.4

3.2

1.4

Health

39.4

41.1

14.3

2.8

2.4

Creativity

38.7

47.9

8.5

2.8

2.1

2.

Do a good job of personnel work

47.3

41.8

5.8

3.1

2.1

- Recruitment

48.4

37.4

9.3

2.1

2.8

- Layout and use

51.4

37.2

6.9

2.1

2.4

- Training and development

34.4

49.0

11.5

3.1

2.1

- Evaluate

37.1

45.8

11.2

3.1

2.8

- Welfare policy

50.3

37.8

6.6

2.1

3.1

3.

Create a good working environment

56.2

29.2

8.0

3.6

2.9

(Note: 1- Very necessary, 2- Necessary, 3- Normal, 4 - Not necessary, 5 - Not necessary


Appendix 2

LIST OF TECHNICAL WORKER TRAINING PROGRAMS


STT

Industry Group


Profession

I

Drilling - Mining

1

Drilling Operating drilling equipment

2

Mining Mining Equipment Operation


3

Mechanical cutting, turning, milling, planing

4

Dynamic mechanics

5

Tool Repair & Maintenance

6

Mechanical oil and gas processing equipment

7

Mining drilling equipment mechanics

III

Electricity

8

Power Plant Operation

9

Industrial electricity

IV

Automated measurement

10

Electricity - Measurement - Automation

V

Diving and surveying underground structures

11

Dive deep

12

Construction surveyor, Data collector.

VI

Welding - Assembly - Anti-corrosion

13

Metal structure assembly

14

Anti-corrosion

15

Weld

16

High pressure welding

VII

Oil and gas processing equipment operation

17

High pressure boiler equipment operation

18

Operation & repair of compressor motor

19

Gas station & pipeline operation

20

Oil and Gas Processing Technology & Equipment

21

Oil and gas equipment operation and repair

22

Gas processing plant operation

23

Refinery Operations

24

Nitrogen Plant Operation

25

Plastic Factory Operation

26

Condensate Plant Operation

VIII

Service

27

Transmission

Comment


Agree Privacy Policy *