Based on the criteria of a farm, as of July 2007, through investigation and review, the whole district had 81 farms. The number of farms in 2007 compared to 2001 increased by 62 farms, including:
- Combined aquaculture and livestock farms: there are 43 farms. The land area of these farms is 1,625 hectares. The number of farm workers is 382 people, including 90 farm owners. The total investment capital of these farms is 10,750 million VND, of which 4,290 million VND is borrowed capital. The average income of a farm is 90 million VND/farm/year, the average value of goods for a farm is 123.3 million VND.
- Concentrated livestock farms: there are 14 farms with a total land area of 138.19 hectares. The number of farm workers is 96 people, of which 40 are farm owners. The total investment capital of farm owners of this model is 18,200 million VND, of which 8,370 million VND is borrowed capital. The average income of a farm is 1,200 million VND/farm/year, the average value of goods for a farm is 591.8 million VND.
- Fruit tree farms: 3 farms with a total area of 7.5 hectares. The number of workers is 23 people, of which 9 are farm owners. The total investment capital of the farm owner is 470 million VND, of which the loan capital is 40 million VND. The average income of each farm is 50 million VND/farm/year, the value of goods reaches 64.3 million VND.
Maybe you are interested!
-
Solutions for tourism development in Tien Lang - 10
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism, tourism development
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
- District People's Committees and authorities of communes with tourist attractions should support, promote, and provide necessary information to people, helping them improve their knowledge about tourism. Raise tourism awareness for local people.
*
* *
Due to limited knowledge and research time, the thesis inevitably has shortcomings. Therefore, I look forward to receiving guidance from teachers, experts as well as your comments to make the thesis more complete.
Chapter III Conclusion
Through the issues presented in Chapter II, we can come to some conclusions:
Based on the strengths of available tourism resources, the types of tourism in Tien Lang that need to be promoted in the coming time are sightseeing and resort tourism, discovery tourism, weekend tourism. To improve the quality and diversify tourism products, Tien Lang district needs to combine with local cultural tourism resources, at the same time combine with surrounding areas, build rich tourism products. The strengths of Tien Lang tourism are eco-tourism and cultural tourism, so developing Tien Lang tourism must always go hand in hand with restoring and preserving types of cultural tourism resources. Some necessary measures to support and improve the efficiency of exploiting tourism resources in Tien Lang are: strengthening the construction of technical facilities and labor force serving tourism, actively promoting and advertising tourism, and expanding forms of capital mobilization for tourism development.
CONCLUDE
I Conclusion
1. Based on the results achieved within the framework of the thesis's needs, some basic conclusions can be drawn as follows:
Tien Lang is a locality with great potential for tourism development. The relatively abundant cultural tourism resources and ecological tourism resources have great appeal to tourists. Based on this potential, Tien Lang can build a unique tourism industry that is competitive enough with other localities within Hai Phong city and neighboring areas.
In recent years, the exploitation of the advantages of resources to develop tourism and build tourist routes in Tien Lang has not been commensurate with the available potential. In terms of quantity, many resource objects have not been brought into the purpose of tourism development. In terms of time, the regular service time has not been extended to attract more visitors. Infrastructure and technical facilities are still weak. The labor force is still thin and weak in terms of expertise. Tourism programs and routes have not been organized properly, the exploitation content is still monotonous, so it has not attracted many visitors. Although resources have not been mobilized much for tourism development, they are facing the risk of destruction and degradation.
2. Based on the results of investigation, analysis, synthesis, evaluation and selective absorption of research results of related topics, the thesis has proposed a number of necessary solutions to improve the efficiency of exploiting tourism resources in Tien Lang such as: promoting the restoration and conservation of tourism resources, focusing on investment and key exploitation of ecotourism resources, strengthening the construction of infrastructure and tourism workforce. Expanding forms of capital mobilization. In addition, the thesis has built a number of tourist routes of Hai Phong in which Tien Lang tourism resources play an important role.
Exploiting Tien Lang tourism resources for tourism development is currently facing many difficulties. The above measures, if applied synchronously, will likely bring new prospects for the local tourism industry, contributing to making Tien Lang tourism an important economic sector in the district's economic structure.
REFERENCES
1. Nhuan Ha, Trinh Minh Hien, Tran Phuong, Hai Phong - Historical and cultural relics, Hai Phong Publishing House, 1993
2. Hai Phong City History Council, Hai Phong Gazetteer, Hai Phong Publishing House, 1990.
3. Hai Phong City History Council, History of Tien Lang District Party Committee, Hai Phong Publishing House, 1990.
4. Hai Phong City History Council, University of Social Sciences and Humanities, VNU, Hai Phong Place Names Encyclopedia, Hai Phong Publishing House. 2001.
5. Law on Cultural Heritage and documents guiding its implementation, National Political Publishing House, Hanoi, 2003.
6. Tran Duc Thanh, Lecture on Tourism Geography, Faculty of Tourism, University of Social Sciences and Humanities, VNU, 2006
7. Hai Phong Center for Social Sciences and Humanities, Some typical cultural heritages of Hai Phong, Hai Phong Publishing House, 2001
8. Nguyen Ngoc Thao (editor-in-chief, Tourism Geography, Hai Phong Publishing House, two volumes (2001-2002)
9. Nguyen Minh Tue and group of authors, Hai Phong Tourism Geography, Ho Chi Minh City Publishing House, 1997.
10. Nguyen Thanh Son, Hai Phong Tourism Territory Organization, Associate Doctoral Thesis in Geological Geography, Hanoi, 1996.
11. Decision No. 2033/QD – UB on detailed planning of Tien Lang town, Hai Phong city until 2020.
12. Department of Culture, Information, Hai Phong Museum, Hai Phong relics
- National ranked scenic spot, Hai Phong Publishing House, 2005. 13. Tien Lang District People's Committee, Economic Development Planning -
Culture - Society of Tien Lang district to 2010.
14.Website www.HaiPhong.gov.vn
APPENDIX 1
List of national ranked monuments
STT
Name of the monument
Number, year of decisiondetermine
Location
1
Gam Temple
938 VH/QĐ04/08/1992
Cam Khe Village- Toan Thang commune
2
Doc Hau Temple
9381 VH/QĐ04/08/1992
Doc Hau Village –Toan Thang commune
3
Cuu Doi Communal House
3207 VH/QĐDecember 30, 1991
Zone II of townTien Lang
4
Ha Dai Temple
938 VH/QĐ04/08/1992
Ha Dai Village –Tien Thanh commune
APPENDIX II
STT
Name of the monument
Number, year of decision
Location
1
Phu Ke Pagoda Temple
178/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Zone 1 - townTien Lang
2
Trung Lang Temple
178/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Zone 4 – townTien Lang
3
Bao Khanh Pagoda
1900/QD-UBAugust 24, 2006
Nam Tu Village -Kien Thiet commune
4
Bach Da Pagoda
1792/QD-UB11/11/2002
Hung Thang Commune
5
Ngoc Dong Temple
177/QD-UBNovember 27, 2005
Tien Thanh Commune
6
Tomb of Minister TSNhu Van Lan
2848/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2003
Nam Tu Village -Kien Thiet commune
7
Canh Son Stone Temple
2160/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2003
Van Doi Commune –Doan Lap
8
Meiji Temple
2259/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2002
Toan Thang Commune
9
Tien Doi Noi Temple
477/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2005
Doan Lap Commune
10
Tu Doi Temple
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Doan Lap Commune
11
Duyen Lao Temple
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Tien Minh Commune
12
Dinh Xuan Uc Pagoda
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Bac Hung Commune
13
Chu Khe Pagoda
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Hung Thang Commune
14
Dong Dinh
2848/QD-UBNovember 21, 2002
Vinh Quang Commune
15
President's Memorial HouseTon Duc Thang
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
NT Quy Cao
Ha Dai Temple
Ben Vua Temple
Tien Lang hot spring
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 16pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 6pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 12pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
Economic and social changes in My Duc district, Ha Tay from 1991 to 2008 - 21 -
Overview of the Economic, Social and Educational Situation of Dak Glong District, Dak Nong Province -
Evaluating the economic efficiency of shrimp paste processing of households in Ha Yen commune, Ha Trung district, Thanh Hoa province - 17 -
Identify Rating Levels and Rating Scales
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism,quan lan,quang ninh,ecology,ecotourism,minh chau,van don,geography,geographical basis,tourism development,science
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
of the islanders. Therefore, this indicator will be divided into two sub-indicators:
a1. Natural tourism attractiveness a2. Cultural tourism attractiveness
b. Tourist capacity
The two island communes in Quan Lan have different capacities to receive tourists. Minh Chau Commune is home to many standard hotels and resorts, attracting high-income domestic and international tourists. Meanwhile, Quan Lan Commune has many motels mainly built and operated by local people, so the scale and quality are not high, and will be suitable for ordinary tourists such as students.
c. Time of exploitation of Quan Lan Island Commune:
Quan Lan tourism is seasonal due to weather and climate conditions and festivals only take place on certain days of the year, specifically in spring. In Quan Lan commune, the period from April to June and from September to November is considered the best time to visit Quan Lan because the cultural tourism activities are mainly associated with festivals taking place during this time.
Minh Chau island commune:
Tourism exploitation time is all year round, because this is a place with a number of tourist attractions with diverse ecosystems such as Bai Tu Long National Park Research Center, Tram forest, Turtle Laying Beach, so besides coming to the beach for tourism and vacation in the summer, Minh Chau will attract research groups to come for tourism combined with research at other times of the year.
d. Sustainability
The sustainability of ecotourism sites in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes depends on the sensitivity of the ecosystems to climate changes.
landscape. In general, these tourist destinations have a fairly high level of sustainability, because they are natural ecosystems, planned and protected. However, if a large number of tourists gather at certain times, it can exceed the carrying capacity and affect the sustainability of the environment (polluted beaches, damaged trees, animals moving away from their habitats, etc.), then the sustainability of the above ecosystems (natural ecosystems, human ecosystems) will also be affected and become less sustainable.
e. Location and accessibility
Both island communes have ports to take tourists to visit from Van Don wharf:
- Quan Lan – Van Don traffic route:
Phuc Thinh – Viet Anh high-speed boat and Quang Minh high-speed boat, depart at 8am and 2pm from Van Don to Quan Lan, and at 7am and 1pm from Quan Lan to Van Don. There are also wooden boats departing at 7am and 1pm.
- Van Don - Minh Chau traffic route:
Chung Huong high-speed train, Minh Chau train, morning 7:30 and afternoon 13:30 from Van Don to Minh Chau, morning 6:30 and afternoon 13:00 from Minh Chau to Van Don.
f. Infrastructure
Despite receiving investment attention, the issue of infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism on Quan Lan Island is still an issue that needs to be resolved because it has a direct impact on the implementation of ecotourism activities. The minimum conditions for serving tourists such as accommodation, electricity, water, communication, especially medical services, and security work need to be given top priority. Ecotourism spots in Minh Chau commune are assessed to have better infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism because there are quite complete and synchronous conditions for serving tourists, meeting many needs of domestic and foreign tourists.
3.2.1.4. Determine assessment levels and assessment scales
Corresponding to the levels of each criterion, the index is the score of those levels in the order of 4, 3, 2, 1 decreasing according to the standard of each level: very attractive (4), attractive (3), average (2), less attractive (1).
3.2.1.5. Determining the coefficients of the criteria
For the assessment of DLST in the two communes of Quan Lan and Minh Chau islands, the students added evaluation coefficients to show the importance of the criteria and indicators as follows:
Coefficient 3 with criteria: Attractiveness, Exploitation time. These are the 2 most important criteria for attracting tourists to tourism in general and eco-tourism in particular, so they have the highest coefficient.
Coefficient 2 with criteria: Capacity, Infrastructure, Location and accessibility . Because the assessment area is an island commune of Van Don district, the above criteria are selected by the author with appropriate coefficients at the average level.
Coefficient 1 with criteria: Sustainability. Quan Lan has natural and human-made ecotourism sites, with high biodiversity and little impact from local human factors. Most of the ecotourism sites are still wild, so they are highly sustainable.
3.2.1.6. Results of DLST assessment on Quan Lan island
a. Assessment of the potential for natural tourism development
For Minh Chau commune:
+ Natural tourism attractiveness is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined as average (2 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of Capacity criterion is 2 x 2 = 4.
+ Exploitation time is long (4 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Exploitation time criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is assessed as good (3 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 3 x 2 = 6 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Minh Chau commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 4 + 12 + 4 + 4 + 6 = 42 points
Similar assessment for Quan Lan commune, we have the following table:
Table 3.3: Assessment of the potential for natural ecotourism development in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of self-tourismof course
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
CommuneMinh Chau
12
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
42/52
Quan CommuneLan
6
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
33/52
b. Assessment of the potential for humanistic tourism development
For Quan Lan commune:
+ The attractiveness of human tourism is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined to be large (3 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Capacity criterion is 3 x 2 = 6.
+ Mining time is average (3 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Mining time criterion is 3 x 3 = 9.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points.
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is rated as average (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Quan Lan commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 6 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 4 = 36 points.
Similar assessment with Minh Chau commune we have the following table:
Table 3.4: Assessment of the potential for developing humanistic eco-tourism in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of human tourismliterature
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Quan CommuneLan
12
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
39/52
Minh CommuneChau
6
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
36/52
Basically, both Minh Chau and Quan Lan localities have quite favorable conditions for developing ecotourism. However, Quan Lan commune has more advantages to develop ecotourism in a humanistic direction, because this is an area with many famous historical relics such as Quan Lan Communal House, Quan Lan Pagoda, Temple worshiping the hero Tran Khanh Du, ... along with local festivals held annually such as the wind praying ceremony (March 15), Quan Lan festival (June 10-19); due to its location near the port and long exploitation time, the beaches in Quan Lan commune (especially Quan Lan beach) are no longer hygienic and clean to ensure the needs of tourists coming to relax and swim; this is also an area with many beautiful landscapes such as Got Beo wind pass, Ong Phong head, Voi Voi cave, but the ability to access these places is still very limited (dirt hill road, lots of gravel and rocks), especially during rainy and windy times; In addition, other natural resources such as mangrove forests and sea worms have not been really exploited for tourism purposes and ecotourism development. On the contrary, Minh Chau commune has more advantages in developing ecotourism in the direction of natural tourism, this is an area with diverse ecosystems such as at Rua De Beach, Bai Tu Long National Park Conservation Center...; Minh Chau beach is highly appreciated for its natural beauty and cleanliness, ranked in the top ten most beautiful beaches in Vietnam; Minh Chau commune is also home to Tram forest with a large area and a purity of up to 90%, suitable for building bridges through the forest (a very effective type of natural ecotourism currently applied by many countries) for tourists to sightsee, as well as for the purpose of studying and researching.
Figure 3.1: Thenmala Forest Bridge (India) Source: https://www.thenmalaecotourism.com/(August 21, 2019)
3.2.2. Using SWOT matrix to evaluate Quan Lan island tourism
General assessment of current tourism activities of Quan Lan island is shown through the following SWOT matrix:
Table 3.5: SWOT matrix evaluating tourism activities on Quan Lan island
Internal agent
Strengths- There is a lot of potential for tourism development, especially natural ecotourism and humanistic ecotourism.- The unskilled labor force is relatively abundant.- resource environmentunpolluted, still
Weaknesses- Poorly developed infrastructure, especially traffic routes to tourist destinations on the island.- The team of professional staff is still weak.- Tourism products in general
quite wild, originalintact
general and DLST in particularalone is monotonous.
External agents
Opportunity- Tourism is a key industry in the socio-economic development strategy of the province and Van Don economic zone.- Quan Lan was selected as a pilot area for eco-tourism development within the framework of the green growth project between Quang Ninh province and the Japanese organization JICA.- The flow of tourists and especially ecotourism in the world tends toincreasing
Challenge- Weather and climate change abnormally.- Competition in tourism products is increasingly fierce, especially with other localities in the province such as Ha Long, Mong Cai...- Awareness of tourists, especially domestic tourists, about ecotourism and nature conservation is not high.
Through summary analysis using SWOT matrix we see that:
To exploit strengths and take advantage of opportunities, it is necessary to:
- Diversify products and service types (build more tourism routes aimed at specific needs of tourists: experiential tourism immersed in nature, spiritual cultural tourism...)
- Effective exploitation of resources and differentiated products (natural resources and human resources)
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: #0D0D0D; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -3pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Symbol, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:Wingdings; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:Cambria, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: #212121; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex
- Annual crop farms: 9 farms with a total area of 67 hectares. The total number of farms of this type of farm is 149 people, of which the farm owner's labor is 39 people. The total investment capital is 1,250 million VND, of which 610 million VND is borrowed capital. The average income of a farm is 80 million VND/farm/year, the average value of goods is 60.6 million VND.
- General business farm: 3 farms with 16 workers and total investment capital of 1,650 million VND (loan capital is 720 million VND). Average income of a farm is 85 million VND/farm/year.

Through a survey of farm types in the district, it shows that: livestock farm models and combined aquaculture - livestock farms have high income.
higher import and commodity value than other farm models. Some typical models in these two types of farms can be mentioned as follows:
+ The rice - pig - fish - goat farm model, 15 hectares in scale of farm owner Nguyen Xuan Chinh (Hop Thanh commune) grows one rice crop, one fish crop, raises pigs and goats. This is a large-scale farm raising about 500 pigs/year with a total output of 45 tons of live pigs/year. In addition, 40 tons of rice, 30 tons of fish, 40 goats are harvested annually. Annual production costs are 1.308 million VND/ha. Net income from farming and raising livestock is about 390 million VND/year. The main income is from fish (50%) and pigs (41%). If deducting the cost of paying bank interest, land rent, and depreciation of fixed assets, the farm's actual profit is about 236 million VND/year. Regarding the environment, the farm owner has built a biogas tank to treat fertilizer before raising fish, which is both economically efficient and does not pollute the environment.
+ Banana - fish - duck farm model, scale 3 ha of farm owner Nguyen Van Truong (Doc Tin commune). Annual net income 265 million VND, of which income from bananas accounts for 73.6%. If deducting bank interest expenses and fixed asset depreciation, the farm's actual profit is 178.5 million VND/year.
+ Lotus - fish - duck farm model, scale 1,008ha of farm owner Bui Minh Thu (Hung Tien commune). The annual output of the farm is: 1.4 tons of lotus, 93,400 eggs (320 laying ducks), 2 tons of fish. Average annual net income is 54.8 million VND, giving a profit of 46.5 million VND/year.
+ The rice - fish - pig - cow model of farm owner Phung Van The (Tuy Lai commune) with an average annual output of: 7 tons of sticky rice, 12 tons of fish, 2.8 tons of pork, 80 breeding pigs, 2 calves. The farm's net income is about 115 to 130 million VND/year, of which 58.7% is from fish, 17.8% from pigs, and 7.3% from rice. If deducting the cost of paying bank interest, land rental costs, and depreciation of fixed assets, the farm's actual profit is about 60 - 70 million VND/year.
+ Model of egg-laying chicken farm of Mr. Nguyen Van Tho's family (Dong Tam commune) with an area of 1.0 ha. Investment capital for factory construction is 300
million VND, investment capital for seeds and food in one year is 2.4 billion VND, annual harvest is 3,000,000 eggs. If deducting bank capital costs, land rent, depreciation of fixed assets, profit is from 500 to 700 million VND/year.
In general, the results of farm development show that the number of agricultural farms in the district is still small in number and small in scale.
Regarding area: the area of farms is still small. Of the average 7.3ha of farm area, 2.4ha is land contracted for land fund I, the remaining 4.9ha is land fund II, so farms are not confident in investing heavily. On average, a farm growing annual crops and perennial crops only ensures over 2.5ha/farm.
Investment capital in production of farms is also modest, on average a new farm invests 284.3 million VND, of which borrowed capital is 98.2 million VND. Through synthesis of farms, it shows that capital in fruit farms and perennial tree farms has the least investment capital (from 130 - 150 million VND). Combined aquaculture - livestock farms and concentrated livestock farms have more investment capital. This is also a characteristic of each farm model. Farm owners have not secured capital for production, borrowed capital accounts for 35% of total investment capital, of which bank loans are 26%.
Based on the criteria of area and low investment capital, the income of the farms is only average, reaching 54 million VND on average, the average value of goods of a farm is only 219 million VND. The total income value is 52 million VND/1ha of cultivated land. The average income per year of a farm owner is only 12.5 million, which is still low compared to the economic development target of the district.
Regarding the professional qualifications of farm owners: out of 72 new farm owners, 12 have intermediate qualifications and 7 have college and university degrees. Thus, farm owners in the district still rely heavily on their own production experience, so the ability to absorb new science and progress in the fields of agriculture and aquaculture is still limited.
Regarding the environmental work of farms: Households producing according to the combined aquaculture - livestock model have 8 concentrated Biogas tanks in Dai Nghia town. Some concentrated livestock farms have also been relocated far from residential areas to ensure environmental hygiene. However, the livestock farming of many farms still does not have a reasonable waste treatment process. Many farms use livestock and poultry waste to discharge into fish ponds and directly fertilize crops in the conversion area, polluting water and air sources, affecting the living environment of residential areas. This issue requires authorities at all levels to pay special attention in the process of directing the development of farm economics in the coming years.
Farm development is an inevitable trend, in line with the law of agricultural development in the direction of increasing the volume of agricultural products, increasing income per unit area, and increasing the ability to attract labor to create jobs. In My Duc, although farms often develop spontaneously due to weak regular management by the government, there is no close connection and adequate support in terms of development orientation, capital, production techniques, risk prevention, etc. between the State, scientists and farm owners, so the income value per unit area of the farm is still low. However, the development of the farm economy has affirmed its superiority over the household economy in exploiting the potential of land, labor, mobilizing capital, etc., creating many agricultural, forestry and fishery products, meeting part of the consumption needs in the district and surrounding districts and provinces; attracting a significant surplus labor force in rural areas, increasing income and improving the lives of workers. Developing farm economy has actively contributed to the process of shifting the structure of crops, livestock and rural economy, creating money for agricultural product processing industry, bringing service industries to rural areas, and initially changing the face of rural areas.
* Forestry:
Developing forestry is considered the main direction of My Duc in the period of promoting industrialization and modernization of the country. The district has
policies to encourage increased participation of people in afforestation, liberalization of forest product trade. However, forestry is not My Duc's economic strength. From 1996 to 2000, the district directed localities with forest land to do a good job of managing, protecting, tending and preventing forest fires with a total stable forest area of 2,080 hectares, accounting for 10.2% of the forestry land area, but the reserves are not yet available because they are newly planted. The forests are mainly natural forests, few special-use forests, and due to the requirements of environmental protection and serving the landscape, the exploited products are too few, so the forestry economy only accounts for 0.49% of the total social product of the district.
In 2003, My Duc district handed over the entire forest area to the people for management. The district planted 44 hectares of concentrated forest, 180 thousand scattered trees, and cared for 1,385.5 hectares. The forestry production value reached 15,577 million VND [121].
The forestry land area in My Duc district in 2007 was 3,568.76 ha, accounting for 15.31% of the natural land area, mainly distributed in the communes: Hop Tien (24.26 ha); Huong Son (2,372.97 ha); An Phu (956.44 ha) and Tuy Lai (215.09 ha). Of which, the special-use forest area was 3,073.57 ha, concentrated entirely in the two communes of Huong Son (2,372.97 ha) and An Phu (700.06 ha), playing a role in serving the scenic area and protecting the environment. The remaining forest area was production forest (452.59 ha), distributed in some communes such as Hop Tien, Tuy Lai... but the timber reserve was not high.
Because natural forests are mostly special-use forests, serving scenic spots and environmental protection, and are not exploited, the production value only reached 4,520 million VND, accounting for 0.97% of the total production value of the agricultural and forestry sector.
* Fisheries:
Regarding aquaculture, My Duc's water surface area is quite large at 1,039 hectares, accounting for 10.35% of natural land, of which 530.6 hectares are used for fish farming. The remaining river and stream water surface, if well utilized, will bring high efficiency in aquaculture. The level of intensive fish farming of the people is getting better and better, so the annual output of fish meat increases: in 1996 it was 1,045 tons, by 2015.
2000 to 1,600 tons, an average annual increase of 11.3%. The movement of raising specialty aquatic products such as: turtles, frogs, catfish... has been initiated but has not yet developed strongly due to product consumption. Therefore, the production value of the aquatic industry has only reached 8,050 million (accounting for 1.76% of the total social product), not meeting local demand, and at the same time not commensurate with the available potential of the locality.
The aquaculture area in My Duc district in 2005 was 677.65 hectares, an increase of 149.62 hectares compared to 2000, accounting for 2.93% of the total natural land area. Regarding output: in 2004, it reached 2,434 tons of various aquatic products. The output structure also fluctuated in an upward direction, in 2000 it only accounted for 3.89% of the agricultural production value, but by 2004 this figure reached 7.31%. Within the industry, fish is the main type of animal raised. Giant freshwater prawns have just been introduced to Dai Nghia town, but the area is not large.
Since 2003, as a result of the process of converting the structure of crops and livestock in the district, there are currently about 520 hectares of flooded rice land (land with low productivity of 1 rice crop) converted to production according to the method of 1 rice crop - 1 fish crop, bringing economic efficiency 2 - 3 times higher than that of pure rice cultivation. Therefore, this area has increased rapidly in the following years: in 2004 it was 505 hectares, in 2005 it was 518.64 hectares, and by 2008 it had increased to
2,246 ha (of which 200 ha are intensive farming, 1,430 ha are semi-intensive farming in low-lying fields and 616 ha are extensive farming in Quan On lake).
Due to the increasingly expanding aquaculture area and the increasingly improved level of intensive farming, the aquaculture output has also increased strongly. If in 2004, the aquaculture industry only achieved an output of 2,434 tons, by 2008 the output had increased to 3,087 tons, of which 83.8% was from fish farming. The number of aquaculture households in 2008 was 825 households, achieving an average yield of 1.73 tons/ha/year (intensive farming areas reached 4.2 tons, extensive farming areas in Quan Son lake reached 0.25 tons). The value of aquaculture products is estimated at 48 billion VND, accounting for 13% of the agricultural sector structure.
– forestry and fishery in 2007.
Livestock farming has been given attention and investment, bringing economic income to households. Many households have developed livestock farming into their main industry and become advanced examples in developing excellent production competition. In 2000, the district had 115 typical farming households achieving the title of excellent production for many consecutive years, the most typical being Ms. Nguyen Thi Ut's household (An My commune), Mr. Nguyen Van Hoat's household (Hong Son commune), Mr. Nguyen Duy Cuong's household (Huong Son commune)...
- Scientific, technical and technological activities in agriculture:
Identifying the shift in agricultural economic structure as the focus. Since 1996, My Duc has promoted scientific and technological activities to serve agricultural production, such as organizing 277 training courses on agricultural production knowledge for 27,600 people, organizing 2 training courses on IPM on rice for grassroots, building and developing the magazine "My Duc Agriculture and Rural Areas" to convey the policies of the Party and State, economic information, science - technology, good people, good deeds to encourage people in the district to develop agriculture and rural areas. In addition, the district has applied science and technology, introduced new varieties and advanced farming techniques into production, improved productivity and quality of crops and livestock (rice, corn, soybeans, mulberry, cattle, poultry, etc.) Successfully implemented programs and goals such as livestock breeding program, canal consolidation, food program, hunger eradication and poverty reduction and program to improve the quality of agricultural cooperatives' operations. The face of the countryside is constantly being renewed, and environmental protection is being paid attention to.
In short, besides the achieved results, My Duc's agricultural production has not developed commensurate with the local potential and strengths:
+ Agriculture is still monoculture rice, so when flooded, it directly affects the growth rate of agriculture and farmers' income. The potential to expand the winter crop has not been fully exploited. No region has developed a variety of crops and livestock to serve consumer needs, serve tourists and supply markets in cities and towns.
Not yet developed production of products with economic value to increase income per unit area.
+ Regarding the structure of the agricultural and rural economy, the shift is still slow. In agriculture, the structure between crop cultivation and livestock breeding has not changed dramatically, the proportion of crop cultivation value in the value of agricultural production is still very high, the proportion of livestock breeding and services is very low. The scale of production is small, agricultural products are mainly in the form of preliminary processing, mainly selling raw materials.
+ The application of advanced science and technology in agricultural production is not strong. In some places, the introduction of high-yield plants and animals into production is still cautious, leading to the productivity of rice and some crops being lower than the set plan. The management and operation of agricultural production services are still limited, and there are many difficulties in the material facilities... However, with the achievements in agricultural production, the lessons learned in the leadership and direction of the District Party Committee have created a foundation for My Duc to promote the strengths of the district, continue to promote agricultural economic activities according to the industrialization and modernization policy set by the Party.
b) Handicraft - industry
The basic construction industry group of My Duc in the period of 2005 - 2007 had an average annual growth rate of 22.2%/year, higher than the general growth rate (16.42%/year). Of which, industry - handicraft industry reached a rate of 6.8%/year, the construction industry group reached 30.32%/year. The reason is due to the investment in building a number of infrastructure works and services for economic development in the district. The proportion of the basic construction industry group also increased from 18.83% in 2005 to 20.2% in 2007, and in the first 6 months of 2008 it was 18.2% (the Congress target is 25%). Production value in 2005 reached 195.4 billion VND, increased to 307 billion VND in 2007, estimated to reach 358.7 billion VND in 2008. [121, p. 10].
The number of industrial establishments in the US and Germany increased: In 2003, there were 3,773 establishments; in 2007, there were 4,809 industrial production establishments, of which 100% were





