- Analyze the capacity of community-based organizations to implement a particular project and find options to make projects more effective.
- Evaluation of a specific organization, activity or project area involves using the following methods:
- Assess an organization's ability to perform activities.
- Assess potential project areas for activities.
- Evaluate specific programs related to community needs
Chapter 3
NATURAL, ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL CONDITIONS
3.1. Natural conditions
3.1.1. Geographical location
Van Long National Park has geographical coordinates: From 20 0 20'55" to 20 0 25'45" north latitude; From 105 0 48'00" to 105 0 54'30" east longitude.
- Boundary: Located in 07 communes including Gia Hung, Lien Son, Gia Hoa, Gia Van, Gia Lap, Gia Tan and Gia Thanh communes, Gia Vien district, Ninh Binh province[1, 13].
- The Management Board's office is located in Tap Ninh village, Gia Van commune, Gia Vien district, Ninh Binh province (as shown in Figure 3.1).

Figure 3.1: Map of Van Long Wetland Nature Reserve
3.1.2. Terrain
Van Long Wetland Nature Reserve has a low-lying terrain between rivers and is one of the largest low-lying areas of Ninh Binh province located in the Southeast of the Northern Delta. The massive limestone mountains occupy nearly ¾ of the area of the nature reserve, running in the Northwest - Southeast direction.
The highest peak on this mountain range is 428m. The surface is strongly dissected, with typical terrain being steep, overlapping slopes, jagged peaks with sharp, pointed cat-ear rocks. Large Karst valleys and fields are rarely seen, but small basins under 10ha such as Tranh valley are often seen... At the foot of the limestone mountains, there are often many frog jaws and flooded caves. The boundary between the foot of the limestone mountain ranges and the flooded lowlands is also interspersed with some low slate hills scattered in the area with a height not exceeding 50m.
3.1.3. Climate - hydrology
Van Long Wetland Nature Reserve has an average annual temperature ranging from 23.3 0 C - 23.4 0 C. The cold season starts from the end of November and ends in early March, mainly influenced by the Northeast monsoon. The hottest temperature in July is on average >29 0 C, the lowest temperature is 5 0 C and the highest is 39 0 C. Rainfall is average, ranging from 1800mm - 1900mm, unevenly distributed between seasons. The rainy season lasts from the end of April to the end of October, accounting for 88-90% of the total annual rainfall. The heaviest rain is in August and September, with some days having rainfall up to 451mm[1].
Hydrological system: in the area there are 3 large river systems that affect the hydrological regime in the nature reserve, namely Day River, Boi River and Hoang Long River with many small branches and streams such as Lang River, Canh River. In addition, in the nature reserve there are also some small streams flowing into Van Long lagoon such as Tep stream and some caves in limestone mountains that supply water to Cut lagoon and Van Long lagoon. The characteristics of the large rivers are small slopes, winding
The area is winding and has many small rivers connecting large rivers, creating a fairly dense network.
3.1.4. Land structure
According to the statistics of Gia Vien district[22], by the end of 2019, the total agricultural land area of 7 communes in the conservation area was 6,559.1 hectares, accounting for 75.17% of the total natural area of 7 communes (as shown in Figure 3.2).

Figure 3.2: Land structure of communes in Van Long Wetland Nature Reserve
It can be seen that currently, agricultural land area accounts for the largest proportion with 6,559.1 hectares. Of which, Gia Hung commune has an agricultural land area of 1,373.34 hectares, accounting for 85.24% of the natural area and the commune with the lowest agricultural land area is Gia Tan commune with 443.26 hectares, accounting for 55.83% of the natural area. In general, the communes in the KBT all have an agricultural land area accounting for more than 55% of the total natural land area.
3.2. Socio-economic characteristics
3.2.1. Population and labor:
Van Long Wetland Nature Reserve is planned on the area of 7 communes: Gia Hung, Lien Son, Gia Hoa, Gia Van, Gia Lap, Gia Tan and Gia Thanh. Gia Hoa commune alone has 3 villages: Vuon Thi, Gong Vo and Doi Ngo; Gia Hung commune has 2 villages: Hoa Tien and Cot which are also located in the core area of the nature reserve with 438 households and 2,573 people. The remaining villages of the 7 communes above are the buffer zone of the nature reserve[1].
Data on area, population, labor and poor households living in the buffer zone and core zone of Van Long NKNN are shown in Table 3.1.
Table 3.1: Summary of data on area, population, labor force and poor households living in the core and buffer zones of Van Long wetland nature reserve
TT
Commune | Natural area (ha) | Population | Density Ng/ km 2 | Labor | Poor household | ||||
Total households | Total population | Number | Proportion (%) | Number of households | Proportion (%) | ||||
I | Core and buffer zones | 8,727 | 14,876 | 54,425 | 624 | 25,450 | 46.76 | 1,235 | 8.30 |
1 | Gia Hung | 1.611 | 1,926 | 7,679 | 477 | 3,876 | 50.48 | 210 | 10.90 |
2 | Lien Son | 671 | 1,725 | 6,599 | 984 | 3.425 | 51.90 | 146 | 8.50 |
3 | Gia Hoa | 2,783 | 2,364 | 9,245 | 333 | 4,354 | 47.10 | 95 | 4.02 |
4 | Gia Van | 1,087 | 1.825 | 6,582 | 606 | 3,215 | 48.85 | 181 | 10.02 |
5 | Gia Lap | 898 | 2,356 | 8,314 | 926 | 3,570 | 43.04 | 177 | 7.51 |
6 | Gia Tan | 794 | 2,562 | 9,220 | 1162 | 4,089 | 44.34 | 280 | 10.93 |
7 | Gia Thanh | 883 | 2.118 | 6,786 | 769 | 2,921 | 43.04 | 146 | 6.89 |
II | GV District | 17,846 | 39,485 | 129,868 | 728 | 78,860 | 60.72 | 3,789 | 9.60 |
Maybe you are interested!
-
Study on the relationship between local people's livelihoods and conservation activities in Van Long wetland nature reserve, Ninh Binh province - 11 -
Research on potential, current situation and proposed solutions for sustainable tourism development in Van Long Wetland Nature Reserve, Ninh Binh province - 13 -
Identify Rating Levels and Rating Scales
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism,quan lan,quang ninh,ecology,ecotourism,minh chau,van don,geography,geographical basis,tourism development,science
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
of the islanders. Therefore, this indicator will be divided into two sub-indicators:
a1. Natural tourism attractiveness a2. Cultural tourism attractiveness
b. Tourist capacity
The two island communes in Quan Lan have different capacities to receive tourists. Minh Chau Commune is home to many standard hotels and resorts, attracting high-income domestic and international tourists. Meanwhile, Quan Lan Commune has many motels mainly built and operated by local people, so the scale and quality are not high, and will be suitable for ordinary tourists such as students.
c. Time of exploitation of Quan Lan Island Commune:
Quan Lan tourism is seasonal due to weather and climate conditions and festivals only take place on certain days of the year, specifically in spring. In Quan Lan commune, the period from April to June and from September to November is considered the best time to visit Quan Lan because the cultural tourism activities are mainly associated with festivals taking place during this time.
Minh Chau island commune:
Tourism exploitation time is all year round, because this is a place with a number of tourist attractions with diverse ecosystems such as Bai Tu Long National Park Research Center, Tram forest, Turtle Laying Beach, so besides coming to the beach for tourism and vacation in the summer, Minh Chau will attract research groups to come for tourism combined with research at other times of the year.
d. Sustainability
The sustainability of ecotourism sites in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes depends on the sensitivity of the ecosystems to climate changes.
landscape. In general, these tourist destinations have a fairly high level of sustainability, because they are natural ecosystems, planned and protected. However, if a large number of tourists gather at certain times, it can exceed the carrying capacity and affect the sustainability of the environment (polluted beaches, damaged trees, animals moving away from their habitats, etc.), then the sustainability of the above ecosystems (natural ecosystems, human ecosystems) will also be affected and become less sustainable.
e. Location and accessibility
Both island communes have ports to take tourists to visit from Van Don wharf:
- Quan Lan – Van Don traffic route:
Phuc Thinh – Viet Anh high-speed boat and Quang Minh high-speed boat, depart at 8am and 2pm from Van Don to Quan Lan, and at 7am and 1pm from Quan Lan to Van Don. There are also wooden boats departing at 7am and 1pm.
- Van Don - Minh Chau traffic route:
Chung Huong high-speed train, Minh Chau train, morning 7:30 and afternoon 13:30 from Van Don to Minh Chau, morning 6:30 and afternoon 13:00 from Minh Chau to Van Don.
f. Infrastructure
Despite receiving investment attention, the issue of infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism on Quan Lan Island is still an issue that needs to be resolved because it has a direct impact on the implementation of ecotourism activities. The minimum conditions for serving tourists such as accommodation, electricity, water, communication, especially medical services, and security work need to be given top priority. Ecotourism spots in Minh Chau commune are assessed to have better infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism because there are quite complete and synchronous conditions for serving tourists, meeting many needs of domestic and foreign tourists.
3.2.1.4. Determine assessment levels and assessment scales
Corresponding to the levels of each criterion, the index is the score of those levels in the order of 4, 3, 2, 1 decreasing according to the standard of each level: very attractive (4), attractive (3), average (2), less attractive (1).
3.2.1.5. Determining the coefficients of the criteria
For the assessment of DLST in the two communes of Quan Lan and Minh Chau islands, the students added evaluation coefficients to show the importance of the criteria and indicators as follows:
Coefficient 3 with criteria: Attractiveness, Exploitation time. These are the 2 most important criteria for attracting tourists to tourism in general and eco-tourism in particular, so they have the highest coefficient.
Coefficient 2 with criteria: Capacity, Infrastructure, Location and accessibility . Because the assessment area is an island commune of Van Don district, the above criteria are selected by the author with appropriate coefficients at the average level.
Coefficient 1 with criteria: Sustainability. Quan Lan has natural and human-made ecotourism sites, with high biodiversity and little impact from local human factors. Most of the ecotourism sites are still wild, so they are highly sustainable.
3.2.1.6. Results of DLST assessment on Quan Lan island
a. Assessment of the potential for natural tourism development
For Minh Chau commune:
+ Natural tourism attractiveness is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined as average (2 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of Capacity criterion is 2 x 2 = 4.
+ Exploitation time is long (4 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Exploitation time criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is assessed as good (3 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 3 x 2 = 6 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Minh Chau commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 4 + 12 + 4 + 4 + 6 = 42 points
Similar assessment for Quan Lan commune, we have the following table:
Table 3.3: Assessment of the potential for natural ecotourism development in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of self-tourismof course
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
CommuneMinh Chau
12
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
42/52
Quan CommuneLan
6
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
33/52
b. Assessment of the potential for humanistic tourism development
For Quan Lan commune:
+ The attractiveness of human tourism is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined to be large (3 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Capacity criterion is 3 x 2 = 6.
+ Mining time is average (3 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Mining time criterion is 3 x 3 = 9.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points.
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is rated as average (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Quan Lan commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 6 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 4 = 36 points.
Similar assessment with Minh Chau commune we have the following table:
Table 3.4: Assessment of the potential for developing humanistic eco-tourism in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of human tourismliterature
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Quan CommuneLan
12
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
39/52
Minh CommuneChau
6
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
36/52
Basically, both Minh Chau and Quan Lan localities have quite favorable conditions for developing ecotourism. However, Quan Lan commune has more advantages to develop ecotourism in a humanistic direction, because this is an area with many famous historical relics such as Quan Lan Communal House, Quan Lan Pagoda, Temple worshiping the hero Tran Khanh Du, ... along with local festivals held annually such as the wind praying ceremony (March 15), Quan Lan festival (June 10-19); due to its location near the port and long exploitation time, the beaches in Quan Lan commune (especially Quan Lan beach) are no longer hygienic and clean to ensure the needs of tourists coming to relax and swim; this is also an area with many beautiful landscapes such as Got Beo wind pass, Ong Phong head, Voi Voi cave, but the ability to access these places is still very limited (dirt hill road, lots of gravel and rocks), especially during rainy and windy times; In addition, other natural resources such as mangrove forests and sea worms have not been really exploited for tourism purposes and ecotourism development. On the contrary, Minh Chau commune has more advantages in developing ecotourism in the direction of natural tourism, this is an area with diverse ecosystems such as at Rua De Beach, Bai Tu Long National Park Conservation Center...; Minh Chau beach is highly appreciated for its natural beauty and cleanliness, ranked in the top ten most beautiful beaches in Vietnam; Minh Chau commune is also home to Tram forest with a large area and a purity of up to 90%, suitable for building bridges through the forest (a very effective type of natural ecotourism currently applied by many countries) for tourists to sightsee, as well as for the purpose of studying and researching.
Figure 3.1: Thenmala Forest Bridge (India) Source: https://www.thenmalaecotourism.com/(August 21, 2019)
3.2.2. Using SWOT matrix to evaluate Quan Lan island tourism
General assessment of current tourism activities of Quan Lan island is shown through the following SWOT matrix:
Table 3.5: SWOT matrix evaluating tourism activities on Quan Lan island
Internal agent
Strengths- There is a lot of potential for tourism development, especially natural ecotourism and humanistic ecotourism.- The unskilled labor force is relatively abundant.- resource environmentunpolluted, still
Weaknesses- Poorly developed infrastructure, especially traffic routes to tourist destinations on the island.- The team of professional staff is still weak.- Tourism products in general
quite wild, originalintact
general and DLST in particularalone is monotonous.
External agents
Opportunity- Tourism is a key industry in the socio-economic development strategy of the province and Van Don economic zone.- Quan Lan was selected as a pilot area for eco-tourism development within the framework of the green growth project between Quang Ninh province and the Japanese organization JICA.- The flow of tourists and especially ecotourism in the world tends toincreasing
Challenge- Weather and climate change abnormally.- Competition in tourism products is increasingly fierce, especially with other localities in the province such as Ha Long, Mong Cai...- Awareness of tourists, especially domestic tourists, about ecotourism and nature conservation is not high.
Through summary analysis using SWOT matrix we see that:
To exploit strengths and take advantage of opportunities, it is necessary to:
- Diversify products and service types (build more tourism routes aimed at specific needs of tourists: experiential tourism immersed in nature, spiritual cultural tourism...)
- Effective exploitation of resources and differentiated products (natural resources and human resources)
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: #0D0D0D; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -3pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Symbol, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:Wingdings; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:Cambria, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: #212121; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
Network design - Master Tran Van Long, Master Tran Dinh Tung Compiled - 24 -
Map and GIS Database on Density Distribution and Ecology of 5-Needle Pine
(Source: Gia Vien District Statistics Office 2019)
According to 2019 statistics, the population of 7 communes has 14,876 households with
54,425 people. The least populated commune is Gia Van commune with 6,582 people and the most populated commune is Gia Hoa commune with 9,245 people. The average density is 624 people/km 2 . The average population growth rate is 1.8%. Table 3.2 also shows that the areas of communes with main tourist routes are quite large, namely Gia Hung commune, Gia Hoa commune and Gia Van commune. The relatively high number of people in working age creates favorable conditions for tourism development in the area.
3.2.2. Characteristics of development of health, culture and education
- Health: Village health facilities have not been built yet, and have not met the initial medical examination and treatment needs of the people. In the 5 core villages of the protected area, 4 villages have village nurses (except Cot village), but their professional qualifications are not high, and equipment and medicines have not been invested in. Commune health stations have not fully met the medical examination and treatment needs of the people in the area.
- Education: 100% of school-age children go to school. All communes in the area have primary and secondary schools. The school facilities of 7 communes have been newly built, more spacious and larger in scale, meeting the learning needs of local children.
3.2.3. Infrastructure characteristics
- Irrigation: Dam Cut flood prevention project is the largest irrigation project in the region. In some projects, 03 pumping stations have been built. These projects help local people prevent floods, increase agricultural production and provide domestic water for a part of the population.
- Rural traffic: There are 20km of concrete roads on the Cut lagoon dike and 15km of concrete roads surrounding the Conservation Area. Most of the inter-village and inter-commune roads also have concrete roads.
- The infrastructure at the administrative service area of the KBT is in the process of completion and putting into use items such as: Specimen display house, expert area, community education house, botanical garden, which are good conditions for management and tourism business exploitation. In addition, the KBT Management Board has called for investment in 08 Forest Protection Stations at locations
key points of the KBT. Gia Hung, Gia Hoa and Gia Van communes have built 3 boat docks to serve tourism exploitation activities.
3.2.3.1. Economic development situation in the region
Currently, this area is mainly agricultural production, the tourism economy has initially developed since 2010, but unevenly and only concentrated in Tap Ninh village, Gia Van commune. Small-scale handicrafts and other industries are slow to develop, the average income per capita is low at 1,200,000 VND/month [22], the life of people in the area near the nature reserve is still difficult.
- Agricultural production:
+ Cultivation: The main products are rice, cassava and short-term agricultural crops such as peanuts and sugarcane, which account for very little. In general, the products per capita are not high, leading to food shortages. Therefore, this is also the cause and pressure on the conservation area.
+ Livestock: People in the KBT mainly focus on raising Buffalo, Cow, Pig, Chicken, and Goat. However, the quantity is small, fragmented and not through the selection process, so the productivity is not high. In particular, the livestock grazing here is not planned and has no development strategy, so it also has a significant impact on the conservation of natural resources.
- Industry and construction: There is an industrial park in Gia Tan commune and a number of factories and enterprises located in the remaining communes, which have partly created jobs for a part of the local population, reducing pressure on natural resources.
- Trade - services: Business and service activities in the area are not really vibrant. Organizations and businesses are in the investment stage and initially exploiting the potential of tourism activities. Thus, it can be seen that the economic development situation in the area is still low, tourism is just starting to develop. Only concentrated in some places, not widely developed. Trading services have not been invested heavily.
Chapter 4
RESEARCH RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
4.1. Current status of ecotourism development in Van Long Wetland Nature Reserve.
4.1.1. Tourism business results over the years according to industry targets
4.1.1.1. Tourists
Tourists to Van Long are mainly international tourists (France, Korea, Japan), tourists with high spending ability. Through tourism activities, it has partly contributed to improving people's lives, shifting the economic structure from agriculture to tourism services in accordance with the orientation of the Party and the State.
Statistics on the number of tourists to Van Long from 2017 to 2019 are shown in Table 4.1
Table 4.1: Number of tourists to Van Long Nature Reserve (2017 - 2019)
Unit: Number of visitors
TT
Tourist | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | |
1 | Visitors to Van Long Nature Reserve | 42,608 | 56,200 | 61,355 |
1.1 | International guests | 36,120 | 48,860 | 51,675 |
1.2 | Domestic guests | 6,488 | 7,340 | 9,680 |
(Source: Gia Van Commune People's Committee Statistics Office 2020)
Through the table above, it can be seen that the number of tourists coming to Van Long in 2019 increased by 18,747 people compared to 2017 thanks to better and better tourism promotion to tourists.
4.1.1.2. Tourism facilities
In recent years, the reception center in Gia Van commune has called for and attracted 5 investment projects in tourism business facilities with





