Difference Between Fsc and Non-FSc Family Forestry

15. An Hoa Paper Joint Stock Company (2018). Report on business performance in 2018.

16. An Hoa Paper Joint Stock Company (2019a). Contract to support planting of paper raw material forests.

17. An Hoa Paper Joint Stock Company (2019b). Report on production and business results for the period 2014-2019. Report No. 98/BC-AH dated August 15, 2019.

18. Woodsland Tuyen Quang Joint Stock Company (2016). Annual report 2016. Report No. 95/WL-BC dated October 10, 2016.

19. Woodsland Tuyen Quang Joint Stock Company (2017). Annual report 2017. Report No. 89/WL-BC dated October 18, 2017.

20. Woodsland Tuyen Quang Joint Stock Company (2018). Annual report 2018. Report No. 97/WL-BC dated October 15, 2018.

21. Woodsland Tuyen Quang Joint Stock Company (2019). Contract to support planting raw material forests according to FSC standards.

22. Woodsland Tuyen Quang Joint Stock Company (2020). Report on business performance for the period 2016-2020. Report No. 101/WL-BC dated October 21, 2020.

23. Ham Yen Forestry Company (2016). Production, business and investment development plan for 2016.

24. Ham Yen Forestry Company (2017). Production, business and investment development plan for 2017.

25. Ham Yen Forestry Company (2018). Production, business and investment development plan for 2018.

26. Tuyen Quang Statistical Office (2015). Statistical Yearbook 2014. Statistical Publishing House, Hanoi.

27. Tuyen Quang Statistical Office (2016). Statistical Yearbook 2015. Statistical Publishing House, Hanoi.

28. Tuyen Quang Statistical Office (2017). Statistical Yearbook 2016. Statistical Publishing House, Hanoi.

29. Tuyen Quang Statistics Office (2017), Report on socio-economic situation in December and 12 months of 2017 of Tuyen Quang province, No. 542/BC-CTK dated December 23, 2017

30. Tuyen Quang Statistical Office (2018). Statistical Yearbook 2017. Statistical Publishing House, Hanoi.

31. Tuyen Quang Statistical Office (2019). Statistical Yearbook 2018. Statistical Publishing House, Hanoi.

32. Tuyen Quang Provincial Party Congress (2015). Resolution of the 16th Tuyen Quang Provincial Party Congress, term 2015-2020, from October 22, 2015 to October 24, 2015.

33. Diep Thanh Tung & Phan Thi Thanh Nhan (2018). Factors affecting the level of household participation in forest management, protection and development in Tra Vinh province. Vietnam Journal of Agricultural Science 16: 1112-1119.

34. Dinh Phi Ho (2011). Quantitative research methods and practical studies in development economics - agriculture. Phuong Dong Publishing House, Hanoi.

35. Do Dinh Sam (2002). Using native trees in afforestation in Vietnam. Vietnam Forestry Science Institute. Agriculture Publishing House, Hanoi.

36. Do Quang Giam & Tran Quang Trung (2013). Assessing the ability to participate in contract production of farming households in the midland and mountainous areas of the Northeast: research with tea trees in Tuyen Quang province. Journal of Science and Development. 11: 447-457.

37. Do Thi Nga & Le Duc Niem (2017). Linking farmers and businesses in coffee production and consumption in the Central Highlands. Agricultural University Publishing House, Hanoi.

38. Do Xuan Lap (2020). Wood industry in 2020: Developing value chains, creating sustainability for the wood industry. Viet Wood Magazine. 119, Vol 1+2: 16-17.

39. FLEGT VPA Vietnam (2018). Introduction to VPA. Accessed from http://flegtvpa.com/gioi-thieu-ve-vpa.html on January 10, 2018.

40. Ho Que Hau (2012). Economic linkage between agricultural processing enterprises and farmers in Vietnam. PhD thesis. National Economics University.

41. Ho Que Hau (2015). The relationship between quality and sustainability in economic linkages between enterprises and farmers. Journal of Economics & Development. (222): 71-78.

42. Ho Thanh Thuy (2017). The role of linkage in agricultural production. Journal of Theoretical Education. (269-270): 34-40.

43. Hoang Lien Son (2017). Current status and solutions for developing linkage models according to the value chain of planted forest wood. Vietnam Forestry Science Institute. Agricultural Publishing House, Hanoi.

44. Huu Khue Mai (2001). Dictionary of economic terms. Encyclopedia Publishing House, Hanoi.

45. Le Huu Anh, Nguyen Quoc Oanh, Nguyen Duy Linh, Hoang Thi Ha & Le Phuong Nam (2011). Form of production contract between enterprises and farmers: case study in tea and sugarcane production in Son La. Journal of Science and Development. 9(6): 1032-1040.

46. Nguyen Dinh Phuc, Phan Thi Diem, Giap Thi Thuy Dung & Ngo Thi Le Thuy (2017). Factors affecting the ability to participate in the linkage model in the production and consumption of raw sugarcane of sugarcane growing households with Gia Lai Thermal Power Sugarcane Company. Journal of Science - Hue University. 126: 43-61.

47. Nguyen Manh Dung & Duong Tien Duc (2014). Overview of the wood products market in Vietnam. Report on the results of the project “Investigation, assessment of the current situation, proposal of mechanisms and policies for developing the domestic market for wood and forest products nationwide to serve the restructuring of the industry. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Hanoi.

48. Nguyen Viet Thanh & Phan Thi Minh Hien (2019). Mobilizing farmers to participate in agricultural production linkages in Dong Thap province. Vietnam Journal of Social Sciences. (6): 49-56.

49. Nguyen Vinh Quang, To Xuan Phuc, Nguyen Ton Quyen & Cao Thi Cam (2017). Linkage between wood processing companies and forest growers: Enhancing the value chain of the wood industry. Vietnam Timber and Forest Products Association (Vifores), Forest Trends, Hanoi.

50. Pham Thi Minh Nguyet (2006). Cooperative economics in agriculture. Agricultural Publishing House, Hanoi.

51. Department of Agriculture and Rural Development of Tuyen Quang (2018a). Report on the implementation results of the forestry activity plan in 2018. No. 392/BC-SNN dated October 17, 2018.

52. Department of Agriculture and Rural Development of Tuyen Quang (2018b). Report on developing the Plan to implement the target program for sustainable forestry development in 2019. No. 310/BC-SNN dated August 16, 2018

53. Department of Agriculture and Rural Development of Tuyen Quang (2019a). Report on the implementation results of the forestry activity plan in 2019. No. 310/BC-SNN dated October 18, 2019.

54. Department of Agriculture and Rural Development of Tuyen Quang (2019b). Technical guidance for planting and caring for afforestation using asexual hybrid Acacia trees. Instruction No. 759/HD-SNN dated May 10, 2019

55. Department of Agriculture and Rural Development of Tuyen Quang (2021). Decision on approving the Project on restructuring the agricultural sector towards developing agricultural, forestry and fishery commodities, focusing on key products and specialties in a chain of linkages to ensure quality and high added value associated with new rural construction in the period of 2021-2025, with a vision to 2030. No. 358/QD-UBND dated June 8, 2021.

56. World Wildlife Fund Vietnam (2018). Handbook for sustainable forest management for plantation forests. Vietnam Forestry Administration, Hanoi.

57. To Xuan Phuc & Dang Viet Quang (2017). Linking companies and households to develop rubber plantations in Vietnam: Market opportunities and risks. Forest Trends Report, April 2017

58. To Xuan Phuc, Tran Le Huy & Cao Thi Cam (2019). The US-China trade war - Opportunities and risks for Vietnam's wood industry. The report was conducted by Forest Trends, Vietnam Timber and Forest Products Association, Binh Dinh Timber and Forest Products Association, Ho Chi Minh City Handicraft and Wood Processing Association and Binh Duong Wood Processing Association.

59. To Xuan Phuc, Tran Le Huy, Cao Thi Cam, Nguyen Ton Quyen & Huynh Van Hanh (2018). Vietnam's wood and wood products import and export: Current status and sustainable integration trends. Viforest, FPA Binh Dinh, Forest Trends, Hanoi.

60. General Department of Forestry (2019). Conference on assessing the situation of processing and exporting wood and forest products in the first months of 2019. Accessed from http://tongcuclamnghiep.gov.vn/ LamNghiep/Index/hoi-nghi-danh-gia-tinh-hinh-che-bien-xuat-khau-go-va-lam- san-cac-thang-dau-nam-2019-4060 on September 12, 2019.

61. General Statistics Office (2019). Socio-economic situation in the fourth quarter and the year 2019. Accessed from https://www.gso.gov.vn/ on December 8, 2019.

62. Tran Chi Thien (2019). Strengthening linkages in tea production and consumption among tea growing households in Thai Nguyen province. University-level science and technology topic. University of Economics and Business Administration - Thai Nguyen University.

63. Tran Thanh Dung (2018). Applying Binary Logistic regression model to determine factors affecting participation in the model longan planting. Journal of Science, An Giang University. 20(2): 46-52.

64. Tran Van Hung (2016). Development of wood processing industry in the Southeast region. Doctoral thesis in economics. University of Economics and Law, Ho Chi Minh City National University.

65. Trieu Van Hung, Pham Thu Thuy & Dao Thi Linh Chi (2020). Results of implementing the Vietnam Forestry Development Strategy for the period 2006 - 2020 and proposed contents of the Vietnam Forestry Development Strategy for the period 2021 - 2030, with a vision to 2050. Special report. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).

66. People's Committee of Tuyen Quang province (2020). Project on forestry economic development of Tuyen Quang province for the period 2021-2030, with a vision to 2035. No. 2256/DA-UBND dated March 10, 2020.

67. Government Office (2017). Announcement of the conclusion of Prime Minister Nguyen Xuan Phuc at the working session with leaders of Tuyen Quang province. Announcement No. 150/TB-VPCP.

68. Vietnam Forestry Science Institute (2002). Techniques for growing trees for paper production. Labor - Social Publishing House, Hanoi.

69. Vo Thi Hai Hien (2017). Economic analysis of forest plantation: principles and practices. Accessed from http://tapchicongthuong.vn/bai-viet/phan-tich-kinh-te-trong-rung-nguyen-ly-va-thuc-tien-47088.htm on April 21 , 2017.

70. Vu Ngoc Quyen (2018). Vertical linkage between enterprises and farmers: Theory and some typical examples in Vietnam. Social science information. (5): 14-20.

English:

71. Alexander Vandermeer Simo, Peter Kanowski & Keith Barney (2020). Economic returns to households participating in different models of commercial tree plantations in Lao PDR. International Forestry Review. 22: 132-152.

72. Adiwinata Nawir, Levania Santoso & Irfan Mudhofar (2003). Towards mutually beneficial company-community partnerships in timber plantation: lessons learned from Indonesia. Center for International Forestry Research.

73. Anyonge C. & James Roshetko (2003). Farm-level timber production: Orienting farmers towards the market. 212(54).

74. Axelle Boulay, Luca Tacconi & Peter Kanowski (2013). Financial performance of contract tree farming for smallholders: the case of contract eucalypt tree farming in Thailand. Small-scale Forestry. 12: 165-180.

75. Byron, N. (2001). Keys to smallholder forestry. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods, 11(4), 279-294.

76. Calderon Margaret M & Nawir Ani Adiwinata (2006). An evaluation of the considerations and benefits of forest partnerships to develop tree plantations: case studies in the Philippines. CIFOR working paper No.27.

77. Cossalter Christian & Charlie Pye-Smith (2003). Fast-wood forestry: myths and realities. CIFOR.

78. Curtis A & Race D (1998). Links between farm forestry growers and the wood processing industry: Lessons from the Green Triangle, Tasmania and Western Australia (RIRDC Publication No. 98/41), Canberra, ACT: Report for Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation.

79. Desmond Helen & Digby Race (2000). Global survey and analytical framework for forestry out-grower arrangements, Final Report submitted to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations. ANU Forestry, Canberra, Australia. 54 pages.

80. Del Gatto, F. (2000). Company-community partnerships in the forest sector: case studies from Central America. Doctoral thesis. University of Oxford.

81. Eaton Charles & Andrew Shepherd (2001). Contract farming: partnerships for growth. Food & Agriculture Org.

82. Fayenuwo. GA, Azeez Ismail O & Labode Popoola (2009). "Determinants of mass paticipation in community-based forest management in South-Western Nigeria" in Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Forestry Association of Nigeria, Benin City, Edo State, Nigeria. Vol. 2: Forestry Association of Nigeria.

83. Filippo Del Gatto (2000). Company-community partnerships in the forest sector: case studies from Central America. University of Oxford.

84. Grosh Barbara (1994). Contract farming in Africa: an application of the new institutional economics. Journal of African Economics. 3: 231-261.

85. Haiyun Chen, Ting Zhu, Max Krott & David Maddox (2012). Community forestry management and livelihood development in northwest China: integration of governance, project design, and community participation. Springerlink.com. 67-75.

86. Heinen, J. T., (1996). Human behavior, incentives and protected areas management. Conserv. Biol. 10 (2), 681-684.

87. Guo Hongdong & Robert W Jolly (2008). Contractual arrangements and enforcement in transition agriculture: Theory and evidence from China. Food Policy. 33: 570-575.

88. Patrick Ian (2004). Contract farming in Indonesia: Smallholders and agribusiness working together. Australian Center for International Agricultural Research.

89. Delforge Isabelle (2007). Contract farming in Thailand: A view from the farm, Occasional papers, 552 Global South CUSRI, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand 2.

90. Lise, W., (2000). Factors influencing peoples' participation in forest management in India. Ecol. Econ. 34 (3), 379-392.

91. Mayers J & Vermeulen S (2003). "Partnerships between communities and forestry companies: sharing lessons globally," in XII World Forestry Congress. Retrieved from http://www .fao.org/DOCREP/ARTICLE/WFC/XII/0516-C1. HTM.

92. Mayers James (2000). Company-community forestry partnerships: a growing phenomenon. UNASYLVA-FAO- 33-41.

93. Mayers James (2006). Poverty reduction through commercial forestry: What evidence? What prospects? Research papers. 2(2). The Forests Dialogue, Yale University School of Forestry & Environmental Studies.

94. Mayers James & Vermeulen Sonja (2002). Company-community forestry partnerships: From raw deals to mutual gains. International Institute for Environment and Development, London.

95. Kirsten Johann & Sartorius Kurt (2002). Linking agribusiness and small-scale farmers in developing countries: is there a new role for contract farming? Development Southern Africa. 19: 503-529.

96. Khosa M (2000). Forestry contracting in South Africa. IIED & CSIR.

97. Tysiachniouk Maria (2006). Forest certification in Russia. Confronting sustainability: forest certification in developing and transitioning countries. 261-295.

98. Napier Ted L & Napier Anthony S (1991). Perceptions of conservation compliance among farmers in a highly erodible area of Ohio. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 46: 220-224.

99. Vidal Natalia G (2004). Forest company-community agreements in Brazil: Current status and opportunities for action. Forest Trends Washington DC, USA.

100. Vidal Natalia G (2004). Forest company-community agreements in Mexico: Identifying successful models. Forest Trends.

101. Nawir Adiwinata & Levania Santoso (2005). Mutually beneficial company- community partnerships in plantation development: emerging lessons from Indonesia. International Forestry Review. 7: 177-192.

102. NEIL BYRON (2001). Keys to smallholder forestry. Forests. Trees and Livelihoods. 11: 279-294.

103. Key Nigel & David Runsten (1999). Contract farming, smallholders, and rural development in Latin America: the organization of agroprocessing firms and the scale of outgrower production. World development. 27: 381-401.

104. Ojwang A (2000). Community-company partnerships in forestry in South Africa-An examination of trends. IIED & CSIR.

105. Patrick Collier, Jim Dorgan, and Paul Bell (2002), Factors Influencing farmer participation in forestry,

106. Simmons Paul (2002). Overview of smallholder contract farming in developing countries. Working paper from Agriculture and Development Economics Division of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO- ESA) Number 02-04.

107. Makarabhirom Pearmsak (1997). A study on contract tree farming in Thailand. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Tsukuba.

108. Permadi Dwiko B, Michael Burton, Ram Pandit, Digby Race & Iain Walker (2018). Local community's preferences for accepting a forestry partnership

contract to grow pulpwood in Indonesia: A choice experiment study. Forest Policy and Economics. 91: 73-83.

109. Digby Race, AR Bisjoe, R Hakim, N Hayati, A Kadir, P Kusumedi, AA Nawir, DU Perbatasari, R Purwanti & D Rohadi (2009). Partnerships for involving small-scale growers in commercial forestry: lessons from Australia and Indonesia. International Forestry Review. 11: 88-97.

110. Cairns RI (2000). Outgrower timber schemes in KwaZulu-Natal-Do they build sustainable rural livelihoods and what interventions should be made? IIED & CSIR.

111. Pirard Romain, Henri Petit & Himlal Baral (2017). Local impacts of industrial tree plantations: An empirical analysis in Indonesia across plantation types. Land Use Policy. 60: 242-253.

112. Carsan Sammy & Christine Holding (2006). Growing timber farm: practices, markets and policies. The meru timber marketing pilot program case studies and reviews. World Agroforestry Center.

113. Scherr Sara J, Andy White & David Kaimowitz (2003). Making markets work for forest communities. The International Forestry Review. 5: 67-73.

114. Scherr Sara J, Andy White & David Kaimowitz (2004). A new agenda for forest conservation and poverty reduction: making forest markets work for low-income producers, Cifor. Forest Trends, Washington, DC, USA.

115. Sriboonchitta Songsak & Aree Wiboonpoongse (2008). Overview of contract farming in Thailand: lessons learned. ADB Institute Dicussion Paper No. 112, Tokyo, Japan.

116. The World Bank (2009). Rethinking Forest Partnership and Benefit Sharing: Insights on Factors and Context that Make Collaborative Arrangements Work for Communities and Landowners. Report No. 51575-GLB.

117. Altenburg Tilman (2000). Linkages and spill-overs between transnational corporations and small and medium-sized enterprises in developing countries: Opportunities and policies. German Development Institute, Berlin. ISBN: 3- 88985-217-3.

118. Lukashevich Victor, Ilya Shegelman, Aleksey Vasilyev & Mariia Lukashevich (2016). Forest certification in Russia: development, current state and problems. Central European Forestry Journal. 62: 48-55.

119. Sunderlin William D & Thu Ba Huynh (2005). Poverty alleviation and forests in Vietnam. CIFOR.

APPENDIX

APPENDIX 1. DIFFERENCES BETWEEN FSC AND NON-FSC FORESTRY BY HOUSEHOLDS

Target

FSC certified forest plantation

Forest planting method

normally

Seedling

Acacia auriculiformis, hybrid acacia

Hybrid glue

Source

seedling

Buy at a trusted address, clear origin,

have sales invoice

Free trade, unknown origin

clear, no regard for the bill.

Tree density

2000 - 2500 roots/ha

2500 - 3300 roots/ha

Right to use

land use

100% of households have land use rights certificates

forestry land

Certificate of Forest Land Use Rights

incomplete career

Mining cycle

Popular 7-10 years

Raw wood quality specifications according to FSC standards

Popular 5-7 years

Wood quality specifications according to the requirements of the purchasing company/facility

Planting techniques, care and management

- Purebred

- Prepare the hole, dig the soil, and size the hole properly. Fertilize and fill the hole before planting.

- Do not burn vegetation after exploitation and land preparation for afforestation, weed manually, do not use herbicides.

- Clean the planted forest, collect seedling bags and pesticide packaging for treatment.

- Leave the land near the stream unplanted to make room for the

Other creatures that live on the water's edge

- Can intercrop short-term agricultural crops in the first 1-2 years.

- Pit and hole size are prepared based on personal experience, with or without fertilizer depending on economic conditions of each household.

- Clear and burn the entire area, use herbicides.

- Most people do not pay attention to forest hygiene. They throw away plastic bags in the forest.

- Make the most of the area for planting forests, leaving no empty spaces.

Methods and conditions of forest sale

- Must have an exploitation plan and report 1 year in advance to the company/team leader/cooperative for joint inspection.

- Woodsland Company commits to buy certified wood at a price 10-15% higher than the selling price of regular wood without a certificate.

- Sell to COC sawmills or directly to large round timber companies qualified for sawn timber. Sell branches and small chopped wood to other processing or purchasing facilities.

- Usually, groups of households organize exploitation at the same time and sell to one unit.

- It is not necessary to have a clear plan for exploitation. There are regulations on applying for exploitation permits but they are often not strictly implemented.

- Households take care of output, find buyers and negotiate selling prices themselves.

- Sell standing trees. Sell the whole thing to a processing or purchasing facility (chips or sawn timber).

- Free exploitation organization, and free choice of place of sale.

Related costs and equipment

forest

- Costs for FSC assessment and certification. Costs for compliance with the requirements of certified wood.

- Forestry equipment and tools: saws, knives, labor protection equipment, hoes, shovels... must be available according to regulations.

- Apart from the cost of planting and caring for the forest, there are no other related costs.

- Basic, rudimentary labor tools. Specialized tools are not required as recommended.

Maybe you are interested!