Research to perfect criteria for determining the value of state-owned enterprises in the forestry production sector - 2

LIST OF TABLES

Table 01: Survey sample size 12

Table 3.1: Number of forestry companies by area. 78

Table 3.2. Number of CTLNs according to management level 79

Table 3.6: Results of determining the enterprise value of Yen Son Forestry Company Limited in 2017 - 2019 91

Table 3.7: Results of determining the enterprise value of Quy Nhon Forestry Company Limited (2017-2019) 96

Table 3.8: Results of determining the enterprise value of La Nga Forestry Company Limited in 2017-2019 98

Table 3.9: Enterprise value at the time of determination 101

Table 3.10: Evaluation of criteria used in valuation of DNLN 104

Table 3.11. Summary of the level of influence of macro-environmental factors

................................................................ ................................................................ ..........................110

Table 3.11. Summary of the level of influence of micro-environmental factors

................................................................ ................................................................ ..........................112

Table 3.12. Summary of the influence level of factors belonging to the production characteristics of forestry enterprises 113

Table 4.1. Results of determining the value of Yen Son Forestry Company 132

Table 4.2. Results of re-determining the value of Quy Nhon Forestry Company Limited by asset method 135

Table 4.3. Results of re-valuation of La Nga Forestry One Member Co., Ltd. using the asset method 138

Appendix 3.7: Business performance results of Yen Son LN Company Limited from 2017-2019 173

Appendix 3.8: Business performance results of Quy Nhon LN One Member Co., Ltd. from 2017-2019 174

Appendix 3.9: Business performance of LN La Nga One Member Co., Ltd. from 2017-2019 175


INTRODUCTION

1. Urgency of the topic

We know that all business production decisions of enterprises are related to the use of criteria to determine the value of the enterprise. For internal enterprises, when making budget estimates, it is necessary to consider the effects of specific activities on the value of the enterprise, or when making strategic plans, it is necessary to consider how the value of the enterprise will be affected by those operating plans. As for society, investors also need to use criteria to determine the value of the enterprise as a basis for their business decisions.

With information on criteria for determining enterprise value, investors can know whether the market value of assets is higher or lower than its real value, so that they can make correct buying or selling decisions. Using criteria to determine enterprise value is also extremely necessary in the process of equitization, merger or dissolution of enterprises. All of these enterprises as well as related entities must use criteria to determine enterprise value before making decisions on equitization, merger or dissolution. Even for credit providers who may not be explicitly interested in determining the value of the enterprise's equity criteria, they must at least implicitly pay attention to the equity value criteria if they want to avoid risks in lending activities.

However, in reality, the system of legal documents related to financial handling and types of assets to determine enterprise value still has shortcomings, especially related to criteria for land use rights value or geographical location advantage criteria, brand value criteria, regulations on organizing bidding to select consulting organizations to determine value, regulations on determining value


market of assets. With these limitations, in the past, enterprises have determined the value of enterprises inaccurately and incompletely, causing large losses of assets, especially in the process of equitization and transfer or dissolution of enterprises.

Policy researchers and business management practitioners agree that: The use of criteria to determine enterprise value is a complex and truly important issue. This complexity is not only unique to our country but also to all countries with developed market economies and countries transitioning to market economies. Therefore, it is necessary to have criteria and methods to assess asset value with standards to help determine the correct value of enterprise assets.

The use of criteria to determine the value of state-owned enterprises in the forestry sector in recent years as well as at present still has many shortcomings. In particular, the criteria for determining the value of state-owned enterprises in the forestry sector are very difficult due to the specific characteristics of the industry such as long production cycles, complex production, operating areas are distributed in rural mountainous areas and the basic means of production is land.

When State-owned enterprises in forestry carry out innovation, the use of criteria to determine enterprise value is also inaccurate and unreasonable, causing many difficulties for the process of innovation and restructuring of forestry companies, especially the criteria of land value and forest value. Although the land value of forestry companies is very large, currently the companies have not calculated to determine the value of land use rights into the value of the enterprise's assets. The companies choose the form of land lease with annual payment along with the State's preferential policies for forestry enterprises so as not to add land value to the total value of the enterprise's assets.


In addition, most forestry companies currently include the criteria for the value of forests that are not yet ready for exploitation in the inventory criteria, which is inappropriate because forests that are not yet ready for exploitation have different characteristics compared to other unfinished and finished products. The production cycle in forestry is long, the investment cost in planted forests is long, and must be invested for many years, so it is necessary to separate it into a separate criterion and monitor it differently from normal inventories.

In addition to theoretical issues on forming a scientific approach to this issue, on the discussion forums of financial experts, there are many issues related to the work of determining enterprise value raised such as: valuation mechanism, valuation organization, control of valuation process, selection of valuation organization, valuation method, determination criteria, method of selling enterprise value, state shareholding ratio... However, there has not been any systematic research on both theoretical basis and practical requirements for perfecting criteria for determining the value of state-owned enterprises in the forestry production sector. Recognizing the importance of the issue, with the desire to gradually solve the problems in using criteria to determine the value of forestry enterprises, the researcher realized that there was a need for a research project to objectively and comprehensively evaluate the use of criteria to determine the value of forestry enterprises.

Based on the above problems, the author has chosen the problem: " Research to perfect the criteria for determining the value of state-owned enterprises in the forestry production sector" as the topic of his doctoral thesis.

2. Objectives and research tasks of the thesis

2.1. Research objectives

Based on research on current situation, analysis of factors affecting the


Criteria for determining the value of current forestry enterprises, thereby proposing solutions to improve the criteria for determining the value of state-owned enterprises in the forestry production sector in the coming time.

2.2. Research tasks

1. Contribute to systematizing and clarifying the theoretical and practical basis of criteria for determining the value of state-owned enterprises in forestry

2. Assessment of the current status of criteria for determining the value of state-owned enterprises in forestry in Vietnam

3. Analysis of factors affecting the criteria for determining the value of state-owned enterprises in forestry in Vietnam

4. Propose solutions to improve the criteria for determining the value of state-owned enterprises in the forestry production sector in the coming time.

3. Subject and scope of the thesis research

3.1. Research subjects

The research object of the thesis is the theoretical and practical basis of criteria for determining the value of state-owned enterprises in the forestry production sector.

3.2. Scope of research

* Spatial scope

State-owned enterprises in the forestry production sector with limited scope are selected from 3 representative regions: the Northeast region, the Central Coast region and the Southeast region.

* Time range

- Secondary data collection time: In principle, the longer the selection time, the better and the higher the accuracy. However, within the framework of this topic, due to the specificity of the criteria for determining enterprise value, all are based on data from the last 3 years, so the thesis mainly focuses on the period from 2017-2019, some research content for longer periods.


- Proposals to complete the criteria for determining the value of State-owned enterprises in forestry production applicable for the period from 2021-2030.

* Content scope

The research content of the thesis focuses on the criteria for determining the value of state-owned enterprises in forestry production. Because each method of determining the value of an enterprise has a different system of criteria. Therefore, the topic cannot study all the methods, so it is limited to the main method that enterprises use to determine the value of enterprises today, which is the asset method.

On the other hand, state-owned enterprises in the forestry sector also include many different production fields from forest creation, exploitation, processing and consumption, so it is too broad. Therefore, the topic is also limited to focus on forestry companies that mainly produce and trade planted forests.

4. Research methods

4.1. Approach of research method and theoretical framework of the thesis

Approach:

- Access to financial markets: All criteria for determining enterprise value are valued at market prices at the time of determination.

- Financial analysis approach: Calculating criteria to determine the values ​​of enterprises according to separate entities, which are forestry companies. In the thesis, there are 3 companies selected to represent 3 regions and 1 company as a comparison reference.

- Approach by enterprise type: The topic is limited to forestry enterprises, specifically former state-owned forest enterprises (current forestry companies).


Method of Determining the Value of State-Owned Enterprises in Forestry

career

Criteria for determining the value of agricultural enterprises in forestry production

QT Experience

Background on PT

Production

Propose

complete solution

Analytical framework of the thesis



Determining the value of forestry enterprises


Production factor influence


Production cycle


Location

Production

diversity


Society


Season

Maybe you are interested!

Research to perfect criteria for determining the value of state-owned enterprises in the forestry production sector - 2

General impact

Macro

Micro


Note: : Before and after relationship;

: Impact relationship


Figure 1: Research analysis framework

(Author's suggestion)


4.2. Research method of the thesis

4.2.1 Method of selecting research sites

* Step 1: Select research area

Due to the requirements and characteristics of the research topic, the selection of the research area must ensure that there are forestry companies producing and trading in afforestation with high intensity. The researcher chose the Northeast region as the area for trading in raw materials for the paper industry; the Central region as the area for trading in raw materials for wood chips; and the Southeast region as the area for trading in industrial raw materials. These are also the regions that have been and are in the process of changing the organizational model from state-owned forestry farms to one-member limited liability forestry companies and are also the regions that are planning to equitize forestry companies in the near future.

* Step 2: Select research province

In each selected research area, the author selected provinces representing the area that met the requirements and research contents of the thesis, specifically:

- In the Northeast region, Phu Tho, Yen Bai and Tuyen Quang provinces are selected. These are provinces with highly developed forestry production and business. Production and business mainly focus on paper materials. There are various forms of production organization, but most of them are small-scale.

- In the Central region, the author chose Binh Dinh province, which is a province with quite developed forestry production and business and has the first forest certification model in Vietnam.

- In the Southeast region, the author chose Dong Nai province, this is a province with many forestry companies trading in paper industry raw materials representing the region.

* Step 3: Select forestry enterprises to survey and select the company as a research point

In each selected region and province, the author selected 3 forestry companies for survey:

Comment


Agree Privacy Policy *