85
Table 4.11 shows that the scale of policies for developing the supporting industry is highly appreciated, with an average score ranging from 3.32 to 3.49. When the policies for developing the supporting industry come into practice, especially preferential policies on capital sources, especially bank loans, will help businesses to further strengthen their financial potential.
In recent times, the system of policies and mechanisms of the Government, the State Bank, and the Ministries/Agencies have been focusing on providing very good support for businesses, especially SMEs, such as Decree 39/2018/ND-CP detailing a number of articles of the Law on Support for SMEs [16]; Decree 34/2018/ND-CP on Credit Guarantee Fund for SMEs [17]; Decree 38/2018/ND-CP on investment for innovative start-up SMEs [18]. The system of policies and mechanisms of the State Bank on currency, credit and interest rates. In which, SMEs are a priority group in concentrating capital for production and business, supporting loan interest rates (applying a ceiling on short-term loan interest rates in VND). In addition, SMEs operating in the fields of agriculture and rural areas; export; Supporting industry and high-tech enterprises... are supported by credit policies for this sector of the Government, the State Bank and each locality has policies on investment stimulus; supporting industry and key product development; policies on restructuring agriculture and rural areas.
In recent times, Vietnam has had many mechanisms and policies to support and prioritize the development of this industry such as: "The 2014 Investment Law and Decree No. 118/2015/ND-CP [9] guiding the Investment Law have stipulated that supporting industries are a field with special investment incentives in Vietnam. Corporate income tax (CIT) incentives for investment projects in the production of priority supporting industry products have also been stipulated in Law No. 71/2014/QH13 amending and supplementing a number of articles of the Tax Laws..." (Government, 2014), [7]
In addition, the Government has issued "Decree No. 111/2015/ND-CP on the development of supporting industries [8] with 06 industries receiving support and incentives. Including: Textile - garment, leather - footwear, electronics, automobile manufacturing and assembly, mechanical engineering, supporting industry products for high technology". This Decree specifically stipulates incentives on corporate income tax, import and export tax, value added tax and credit. In particular, SMEs producing supporting industry products in the list of priority supporting industry products for development are also entitled to incentives on investment credit and land rent.... Next, the State's Supporting Industry Development Program for the period 2016 - 2025 is expressed through "Decision No. 68/QD-TTg dated January 18, 2017" [13] and the Regulations on management and implementation of the Supporting Industry Development Program are expressed in "Decision No.
86
10/2017/QD-TTg dated April 3, 2017” [14] and “Circular No. 29/2018/TT-BTC dated March 28, 2018 Guiding the establishment, management and use of funds for the Support Industry Development Program” [5]…
4.2.1.10. About Enterprises participating in industry clusters
Table 4.12. Average scores of assessment scales for enterprises participating in industry clusters
Unit: Point
Enterprises participating in industry clusters
(Min 1 – Max 5)
Average score | ||
CLKN_1 | Supporting industry enterprises create value chains from the raw material supply stage. production materials | 3.25 |
CLKN_2 | Supporting industry enterprises create consumer product value chains. | 3.39 |
CLKN_3 | Supporting industry enterprises participate in supporting industry associations | 3.39 |
CLKN _4 | Supporting industry enterprises meet production scale requirements | 3.48 |
CLKN_5 | Supporting industry enterprises can be raw material suppliers, manufacturers, distribution when participating in industry clusters. | 3.43 |
Maybe you are interested!
-
Identify Rating Levels and Rating Scales
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism,quan lan,quang ninh,ecology,ecotourism,minh chau,van don,geography,geographical basis,tourism development,science
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
of the islanders. Therefore, this indicator will be divided into two sub-indicators:
a1. Natural tourism attractiveness a2. Cultural tourism attractiveness
b. Tourist capacity
The two island communes in Quan Lan have different capacities to receive tourists. Minh Chau Commune is home to many standard hotels and resorts, attracting high-income domestic and international tourists. Meanwhile, Quan Lan Commune has many motels mainly built and operated by local people, so the scale and quality are not high, and will be suitable for ordinary tourists such as students.
c. Time of exploitation of Quan Lan Island Commune:
Quan Lan tourism is seasonal due to weather and climate conditions and festivals only take place on certain days of the year, specifically in spring. In Quan Lan commune, the period from April to June and from September to November is considered the best time to visit Quan Lan because the cultural tourism activities are mainly associated with festivals taking place during this time.
Minh Chau island commune:
Tourism exploitation time is all year round, because this is a place with a number of tourist attractions with diverse ecosystems such as Bai Tu Long National Park Research Center, Tram forest, Turtle Laying Beach, so besides coming to the beach for tourism and vacation in the summer, Minh Chau will attract research groups to come for tourism combined with research at other times of the year.
d. Sustainability
The sustainability of ecotourism sites in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes depends on the sensitivity of the ecosystems to climate changes.
landscape. In general, these tourist destinations have a fairly high level of sustainability, because they are natural ecosystems, planned and protected. However, if a large number of tourists gather at certain times, it can exceed the carrying capacity and affect the sustainability of the environment (polluted beaches, damaged trees, animals moving away from their habitats, etc.), then the sustainability of the above ecosystems (natural ecosystems, human ecosystems) will also be affected and become less sustainable.
e. Location and accessibility
Both island communes have ports to take tourists to visit from Van Don wharf:
- Quan Lan – Van Don traffic route:
Phuc Thinh – Viet Anh high-speed boat and Quang Minh high-speed boat, depart at 8am and 2pm from Van Don to Quan Lan, and at 7am and 1pm from Quan Lan to Van Don. There are also wooden boats departing at 7am and 1pm.
- Van Don - Minh Chau traffic route:
Chung Huong high-speed train, Minh Chau train, morning 7:30 and afternoon 13:30 from Van Don to Minh Chau, morning 6:30 and afternoon 13:00 from Minh Chau to Van Don.
f. Infrastructure
Despite receiving investment attention, the issue of infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism on Quan Lan Island is still an issue that needs to be resolved because it has a direct impact on the implementation of ecotourism activities. The minimum conditions for serving tourists such as accommodation, electricity, water, communication, especially medical services, and security work need to be given top priority. Ecotourism spots in Minh Chau commune are assessed to have better infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism because there are quite complete and synchronous conditions for serving tourists, meeting many needs of domestic and foreign tourists.
3.2.1.4. Determine assessment levels and assessment scales
Corresponding to the levels of each criterion, the index is the score of those levels in the order of 4, 3, 2, 1 decreasing according to the standard of each level: very attractive (4), attractive (3), average (2), less attractive (1).
3.2.1.5. Determining the coefficients of the criteria
For the assessment of DLST in the two communes of Quan Lan and Minh Chau islands, the students added evaluation coefficients to show the importance of the criteria and indicators as follows:
Coefficient 3 with criteria: Attractiveness, Exploitation time. These are the 2 most important criteria for attracting tourists to tourism in general and eco-tourism in particular, so they have the highest coefficient.
Coefficient 2 with criteria: Capacity, Infrastructure, Location and accessibility . Because the assessment area is an island commune of Van Don district, the above criteria are selected by the author with appropriate coefficients at the average level.
Coefficient 1 with criteria: Sustainability. Quan Lan has natural and human-made ecotourism sites, with high biodiversity and little impact from local human factors. Most of the ecotourism sites are still wild, so they are highly sustainable.
3.2.1.6. Results of DLST assessment on Quan Lan island
a. Assessment of the potential for natural tourism development
For Minh Chau commune:
+ Natural tourism attractiveness is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined as average (2 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of Capacity criterion is 2 x 2 = 4.
+ Exploitation time is long (4 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Exploitation time criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is assessed as good (3 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 3 x 2 = 6 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Minh Chau commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 4 + 12 + 4 + 4 + 6 = 42 points
Similar assessment for Quan Lan commune, we have the following table:
Table 3.3: Assessment of the potential for natural ecotourism development in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of self-tourismof course
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
CommuneMinh Chau
12
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
42/52
Quan CommuneLan
6
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
33/52
b. Assessment of the potential for humanistic tourism development
For Quan Lan commune:
+ The attractiveness of human tourism is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined to be large (3 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Capacity criterion is 3 x 2 = 6.
+ Mining time is average (3 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Mining time criterion is 3 x 3 = 9.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points.
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is rated as average (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Quan Lan commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 6 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 4 = 36 points.
Similar assessment with Minh Chau commune we have the following table:
Table 3.4: Assessment of the potential for developing humanistic eco-tourism in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of human tourismliterature
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Quan CommuneLan
12
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
39/52
Minh CommuneChau
6
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
36/52
Basically, both Minh Chau and Quan Lan localities have quite favorable conditions for developing ecotourism. However, Quan Lan commune has more advantages to develop ecotourism in a humanistic direction, because this is an area with many famous historical relics such as Quan Lan Communal House, Quan Lan Pagoda, Temple worshiping the hero Tran Khanh Du, ... along with local festivals held annually such as the wind praying ceremony (March 15), Quan Lan festival (June 10-19); due to its location near the port and long exploitation time, the beaches in Quan Lan commune (especially Quan Lan beach) are no longer hygienic and clean to ensure the needs of tourists coming to relax and swim; this is also an area with many beautiful landscapes such as Got Beo wind pass, Ong Phong head, Voi Voi cave, but the ability to access these places is still very limited (dirt hill road, lots of gravel and rocks), especially during rainy and windy times; In addition, other natural resources such as mangrove forests and sea worms have not been really exploited for tourism purposes and ecotourism development. On the contrary, Minh Chau commune has more advantages in developing ecotourism in the direction of natural tourism, this is an area with diverse ecosystems such as at Rua De Beach, Bai Tu Long National Park Conservation Center...; Minh Chau beach is highly appreciated for its natural beauty and cleanliness, ranked in the top ten most beautiful beaches in Vietnam; Minh Chau commune is also home to Tram forest with a large area and a purity of up to 90%, suitable for building bridges through the forest (a very effective type of natural ecotourism currently applied by many countries) for tourists to sightsee, as well as for the purpose of studying and researching.
Figure 3.1: Thenmala Forest Bridge (India) Source: https://www.thenmalaecotourism.com/(August 21, 2019)
3.2.2. Using SWOT matrix to evaluate Quan Lan island tourism
General assessment of current tourism activities of Quan Lan island is shown through the following SWOT matrix:
Table 3.5: SWOT matrix evaluating tourism activities on Quan Lan island
Internal agent
Strengths- There is a lot of potential for tourism development, especially natural ecotourism and humanistic ecotourism.- The unskilled labor force is relatively abundant.- resource environmentunpolluted, still
Weaknesses- Poorly developed infrastructure, especially traffic routes to tourist destinations on the island.- The team of professional staff is still weak.- Tourism products in general
quite wild, originalintact
general and DLST in particularalone is monotonous.
External agents
Opportunity- Tourism is a key industry in the socio-economic development strategy of the province and Van Don economic zone.- Quan Lan was selected as a pilot area for eco-tourism development within the framework of the green growth project between Quang Ninh province and the Japanese organization JICA.- The flow of tourists and especially ecotourism in the world tends toincreasing
Challenge- Weather and climate change abnormally.- Competition in tourism products is increasingly fierce, especially with other localities in the province such as Ha Long, Mong Cai...- Awareness of tourists, especially domestic tourists, about ecotourism and nature conservation is not high.
Through summary analysis using SWOT matrix we see that:
To exploit strengths and take advantage of opportunities, it is necessary to:
- Diversify products and service types (build more tourism routes aimed at specific needs of tourists: experiential tourism immersed in nature, spiritual cultural tourism...)
- Effective exploitation of resources and differentiated products (natural resources and human resources)
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: #0D0D0D; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -3pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Symbol, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:Wingdings; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:Cambria, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: #212121; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
Evaluation of personal credit service quality of Dong A Commercial Joint Stock Bank - Hue Branch - 9 -
Evaluation Criteria for Expanding Bank Credit to Small and Medium Enterprises -
Retail Credit Quality at Bidv-Hcm Period 2008 – 09/2012: -
Current Status of Credit Quality at Vietnamese Joint Stock Commercial Banks

Source: Author's survey results
Table 4.12 shows that enterprises participating in industry clusters are highly appreciated, in which the scale of "Supporting industry enterprises meeting the required production scale" has the highest average score of 3.48 points. When supporting industry enterprises participate in industry clusters, the condition of meeting the required production scale is extremely important to ensure that enterprises operate in a chain.
Currently, the scale and capacity of supporting industry enterprises are still limited. This is reflected in the small number of enterprises participating in supporting industry, low production capacity, lack of financial resources, lack of high-quality human resources and technology to improve productivity. Domestically produced supporting industry products are mainly components and simple details, with low average technology content, and small value in the product value structure. However, this has limited the number of enterprises participating in industry clusters.
According to statistics, the current rate of domestic enterprises participating in the supply chain of end-to-end manufacturing corporations in Vietnam at the end of 2019 was 30%, a good increase compared to the figure of more than 10% at the end of 2018. More importantly, the potential and opportunities for Vietnamese supporting industry enterprises to participate in the global value chain are expanding because Vietnam is
87
is expected to be the industrial production center of the region in the near future. Economic experts believe that supporting industrial enterprises, especially supporting industries, to transform production and increase the proportion of domestic supply is necessary to promote the development of supporting industries and contribute to attracting and retaining investors. (Ministry of Industry and Trade 2011-2020), [2]
4.2.1.11. About CNHT Enterprises participating in the Multinational Corporation network
Table 4.13. Average scores of assessment scales for CNHT Enterprises participating in the Multinational Corporation network
Unit: Point
Enterprises participating in the Multinational Corporation network
(Min 1 – Max 5)
Average score | ||
National Team_1 | CNHT enterprises participating in branches of the national corporation network | 3.33 |
National Team_2 | CNHT enterprises have business strategies based on competitive advantages. industry picture | 3.49 |
National Team_3 | Products of supporting industry enterprises meet the differences of each nation. | 3.34 |
National Team_4 | Supporting industry enterprises create prestige and brand when participating in the Trade Union. National Team | 3.23 |
National Team_5 | CNHT enterprises clearly understand and promptly grasp technical agreements, marketing agreements, research cooperation, management cooperation development programs... | 3.38 |
Source: Author's survey results
Table 4.13 shows that the average score of the scales for supporting industry enterprises participating in the Multinational Corporation network ranges from 3.23 points to 3.49 points, which is quite high. Supporting industry enterprises participating in the Multinational Corporation network will help supporting industry enterprises gain prestige and competitiveness domestically and internationally.
According to statistics from the Ministry of Industry and Trade in 2019, “Vietnam has 1,800 enterprises producing spare parts and components, of which only about 300 enterprises participate in the production network of multinational corporations. The number of enterprises operating in the supporting industry currently accounts for nearly 4.5% of the total number of enterprises in the processing and manufacturing industry, creating jobs for more than 550,000 workers”. (Ministry of Industry and Trade 2011-2020), [2]
To achieve the Government's goal in Resolution 115/NQ-CP in 2020, " By 2025, Vietnamese enterprises will be able to produce supporting industrial products."
highly competitive, meeting 45% of essential needs for domestic production and consumption, accounting for about 11% of the total industrial production value; by 2030, meeting 70% of domestic needs, accounting for about 14% of industrial production value" The Ministry of Industry and Trade has researched and advised the Government to develop the Law on Supporting Industry and at the same time advised on adjusting and amending problematic and unreasonable regulations in Decree No. 111/2015/ND-CP dated November 3, 2015 related to Supporting Industry [8].
4.2.2. Results of screening survey forms
As presented in the research method section, the author conducted a survey of 600 people who are officers and employees working at 20 Vietnamese commercial banks with the percentage of survey votes shown in Table 4.14.
Table 4.14. Results of screening survey forms
STT
BANK | NUMBER VOUCHER | PROPORTION (%) | STT | BANK | NUMBER VOUCHER | PROPORTION (%) | |
1 | VIETINBANK | 40 | 6.7 | 11 | KLB | 30 | 5.0 |
2 | BIDV | 40 | 6.7 | 12 | TECHCOMBANK | 30 | 5.0 |
3 | VCB | 40 | 6.7 | 13 | NAB | 30 | 5.0 |
4 | ACB | 30 | 5.0 | 14 | OCB | 30 | 5.0 |
5 | ABB | 20 | 3.3 | 15 | MB | 20 | 3.3 |
6 | BAC A BANK | 20 | 3.3 | 16 | SCB | 30 | 5.0 |
7 | LPB | 30 | 5.0 | 17 | SGB | 30 | 5.0 |
8 | EAB | 30 | 5.0 | 18 | SHB | 30 | 5.0 |
9 | SEABANK | 30 | 5.0 | 19 | VIETA BANK | 30 | 5.0 |
10 | MSB | 30 | 5.0 | 20 | EXIMBANK | 30 | 5.0 |
Source: Survey results synthesis
4.2.3. Results of survey sample analysis
Data collected from 600 valid questionnaires will be used for analysis to answer the research questions. After reviewing, “cleaning” the data and processing primary data through Excel software, the data is imported into SPSS 25 software to conduct analysis and evaluation. The results of the analysis process are presented specifically in the following sections.
Table 4.15. Results of survey sample analysis
Sex
Frequency | Percent | ||
Valid | Male | 250 | 41.6 |
Female | 350 | 58.4 | |
Total | 600 | 100 | |
Age | |||
Frequency | Percent | ||
Valid | Under 35 years old | 200 | 33.3 |
35 years old – 45 years old | 100 | 16.7 | |
45 years old – 55 years old | 200 | 33.3 | |
Over 55 years old | 100 | 16.7 | |
Total | 600 | 100 | |
Education level | |||
Frequency | Percent | ||
Valid | Secondary, College | 50 | 8.3 |
University | 350 | 58.4 | |
Master | 190 | 31.6 | |
Dr. | 10 | 1.7 | |
Total | 600 | 100 | |
Number of years working in the bank | |||
Frequency | Percent | ||
Valid | Under 5 years | 90 | 15 |
From 5 years – 10 years | 300 | 50 | |
From 10 years – 20 years | 100 | 16.7 | |
Over 20 years | 110 | 18.3 | |
Total | 600 | 100 | |
Income level | |||
Frequency | Percent | ||
Valid | Under 10 million | 100 | 16.7 |
From 10 million - 15 million | 100 | 16.7 | |
From 15 million - 20 million | 200 | 33.3 | |
Over 20 million | 200 | 33.3 | |
Total | 600 | 100 | |
Source: Author's research results
The data in Table 4.15 shows:
Regarding gender: In the total sample of 600 people surveyed, 250 participants were male (accounting for 41.6%) and 350 participants were female (accounting for 58.4%). Thus, there are few
The difference in the number of men and women at commercial banks when conducting the survey is completely consistent with the characteristics of the banking industry in Vietnam.
Regarding age : According to the survey results, the number of samples under 35 years old is 200 people, accounting for 33.3%; Age from 35 to 45 is 100 people, accounting for 16.7%; Age from 45 to 55 is 200 people, accounting for 33.3% and over 55 years old is 100 people, accounting for 16.7% of the total number of samples surveyed. With the above figures, it can be seen that the staff at Vietnamese commercial banks are quite young, this workforce is dynamic, and adapts quickly to the development of modern banking technology.
Regarding educational level : The staff working at Vietnamese commercial banks are mainly university graduates with 350 people, accounting for 58.4%. In addition, in the survey sample, there are also 50 people with intermediate and college degrees, accounting for 8.3%; 190 people with master's degrees, accounting for 31.6% and 10 staff with doctoral degrees, accounting for 1.7%.
Regarding income: staff at Vietnamese commercial banks have a fairly high income, mainly in the range of 15-20 million and over 20 million with 200 people, accounting for 33.3%. With such an income level, it is enough to ensure people's lives compared to other current business sectors in Vietnam. In addition, the number of employees with incomes below 10 million and 10-15 million also accounts for a fairly high proportion with 100 people (accounting for 16.7%).
4.2.4. Results of analysis of reliability and validity of the scale
4.2.4.1 Assessing the reliability of the scale through Cronbach's Alpha test
The Cronbach's Alpha reliability coefficient method was used before the EFA exploratory factor analysis to eliminate inappropriate variables because they could create spurious factors. The criteria applied to assess the reliability of the scale are that the observed variables must have a corrected item-total correlation coefficient greater than 0.3 and the scale's Alpha reliability (Cronbach's Alpha) greater than 0.6. In the observed variables, after excluding variables with a total correlation coefficient less than 0.3 (the level of association between each variable in the corresponding factor with the remaining variables is low), including: QLRR3, TTKH4, KNQL1 . The study eliminated these variables in the subsequent analysis. When re-checking the reliability of the scale through the Cronbach's Alpha coefficient and the correlation coefficient of the remaining variables, we see that the scale with these variables ensures reliability (Cronbach's Alpha > 0.6).
Table 4.16: Results of reliability testing of the scale
Encryption
Variable description | Cronbach's alpha | Conclude | |
CSTD | Credit policy | 0.721 | Accept |
QTTD | Credit process | 0.632 | Accept |
QLRR | Risk Management | 0.724 | Accept |
TTKH | Customer information | 0.77 | Accept |
Science and Technology | Science and technology | 0.654 | Accept |
KNQL | Management experience | 0.656 | Accept |
NLTC | Financial capacity | 0.614 | Accept |
PAKD | Business plan | 0.611 | Accept |
CSPT | Development policy | 0.712 | Accept |
CLKN | Industry cluster | 0.653 | Accept |
National Team | Multinational Corporation | 0.773 | Accept |
Source: Synthesized from research results
The test results in Table 4.16 show that the observed variables all have a total correlation coefficient greater than 0.3 and the Cronbach's Alpha coefficient is greater than 0.6, proving that the scale used ensures reliability. (Appendix 06)
4.2.4.2 Exploratory factor analysis EFA
The results of factor extraction of observed variables are summarized in table 4.17.
Table 4.17: Factor rotation matrix results
Symbol
Factor rotation matrix | ||||||||||
F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | F6 | F7 | F8 | F9 | F10 | |
CLKN1 | .802 | |||||||||
CLKN2 | .780 | |||||||||
CLKN3 | .767 | |||||||||
CLKN5 | .734 | |||||||||
National Team 4 | .668 | |||||||||
National Team 5 | .658 | |||||||||
National Team 1
.650 | ||||||||||
QLRR3 | .802 | |||||||||
QLRR2 | .730 | |||||||||
QLRR1 | .686 | |||||||||
QLRR4 | .673 | |||||||||
QLRR5 | .663 | |||||||||
NLTC1 | .774 | |||||||||
NLTC2 | .692 | |||||||||
NLTC3 | .663 | |||||||||
NLTC5 | .637 | |||||||||
NLTC4 | .612 | |||||||||
CSTD1 | .676 | |||||||||
CSTD2 | .668 | |||||||||
CSTD3 | .600 | |||||||||
CSTD4 | .599 | |||||||||
Science and Technology 1 | .719 | |||||||||
Science and Technology 5 | .629 | |||||||||
Science and Technology 3 | .601 | |||||||||
Science and Technology 4 | .509 | |||||||||
CSPT2 | .829 | |||||||||
CSPT4 | .639 | |||||||||
CSPT5 | .615 | |||||||||
CSPT3 | .523 | |||||||||
QTTD1 | .716 | |||||||||
QTTD3 | .682 | |||||||||
QTTD4 | .656 | |||||||||
KNQL1 | .845 | |||||||||
KNQL3 | .818 | |||||||||
KNQL2 | .613 | |||||||||
TTKH1 | .674 | |||||||||
TTKH2 | .534 | |||||||||
TTKH3 | .486 | |||||||||
PAKD1 | .812 | |||||||||
PAKD5 | .728 |





