Hard: ……………………………………………………………..
20. What support do you want from the government: Capital: Similar:
Materials: Technical measures:
21. State programs and policies to support longan production that you know: .…………………………………………...…………………………………………
22. Your opinion about longan tree:..……………………………
23. After deducting all household expenses, how much money is left?
…………………………………………………………………………
24. What suggestions do you have for developing longan trees?
…………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………
Thank you very much for your cooperation!
CONFIRMATION OF THE INVESTIGATORS' OWNER
(Sign, print full name) (Sign, print full name)
Bui Hoang Dung
APPENDIX
IBM SPSS Statistics
- Determine the average value of age, population, and number of workers of 120 longan growing households in Chieng Cang, Chieng So, Na Nghiu communes and Song Ma town. Each commune surveyed 30 households.
Song Ma Town
Descriptive Statistics
N | Minimum | Maximum | Mean | Std. Deviation | |
AGE | 30 | 26 | 80 | 51.53 | 11,820 |
PERSONALITY | 30 | 3 | 8 | 5.27 | 1.112 |
NUMBER OF LABOR | 30 | 2 | 7 | 3.43 | 1,278 |
Valid N (listwise) | 30 |
Maybe you are interested!
-
Assessing the current situation and proposing solutions for developing longan trees in Song Ma district, Son La province - 1 -
Assessing the current situation and proposing solutions for developing large-scale timber plantation in Phu Tho province - 11 -
Assessing the current situation and proposing solutions to improve the effectiveness of site clearance and resettlement at some projects in Thanh Tri district, Hanoi city - 14 -
Assessing the current situation and proposing solutions for developing large-scale timber plantation in Phu Tho province - 17 -
Assessing the current situation and proposing solutions for developing longan trees in Song Ma district, Son La province - 12
Chieng So
Descriptive Statistics
N | Minimum | Maximum | Mean | Std. Deviation | |
AGE | 30 | 35 | 68 | 47.73 | 8,313 |
PERSONALITY | 30 | 3 | 6 | 4.83 | .834 |
NUMBER OF LABOR | 30 | 2 | 5 | 2.80 | .961 |
Valid N (listwise) | 30 |
Chieng Cang
Descriptive Statistics
N | Minimum | Maximum | Mean | Std. Deviation | |
AGE | 30 | 31 | 71 | 45.53 | 9,350 |
PERSONALITY | 30 | 4 | 8 | 5.03 | 1,033 |
NUMBER OF LABOR | 30 | 2 | 4 | 2.80 | .847 |
Valid N (listwise) | 30 |
Na Nghiu
Descriptive Statistics
N | Minimum | Maximum | Mean | Std. Deviation | |
AGE | 30 | 25 | 69 | 47.03 | 10,270 |
PERSONALITY | 30 | 4 | 8 | 5.03 | .964 |
NUMBER OF LABOR | 30 | 2 | 5 | 3.50 | 1,075 |
Valid N (listwise) | 30 |
- Determine the educational level of farmers by calculating the educational level ratio of each level. (Primary school: 0 - 5), (Middle school: 6 - 9), (High school: 10 - 12).
LEARNING * TRANSACTION Crosstabulation
Count
DISTANT | Total | ||||
Chiang Kai-shek | Branch S? | What is this? | Song Ma Town | ||
0 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 12 |
2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
LEARN | |||||
7 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 13 |
9 | 9 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 18 |
10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
12 | 9 | 21 | 19 | 23 | 72 |
Total | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 120 |
Count
- Determine the ethnic composition of farming households
ETHNICITY * REMOTE Crosstabulation
DISTANT | Total | ||||
Chiang Kai-shek | Branch S? | What is this? | Song Ma Town | ||
Hey | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Terrible | 3 | 11 | 0 | 25 | 39 |
ETHNICITY | |||||
Tay | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Thai | 27 | 19 | 29 | 4 | 79 |
Total | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 120 |
Count
- Determine the proportion of longan growing forms of households
CLEANING TYPE IN * DISTANCE Crosstabulation
DISTANT | Total | ||||
Chiang Kai-shek | Branch S? | What is this? | Song Ma Town | ||
Label Specialist | 24 | 17 | 27 | 22 | 90 |
CLEAR COUGH | |||||
Label and other trees | 6 | 13 | 3 | 8 | 30 |
Total | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 120 |
Count
- Determine the proportion of varieties grown by farmers.
INNER * FAR Crosstabulation
DISTANT | Total | |||||
Chiang Kai-shek | Branch S? | What is this? | Song Ma Town | |||
Composite label | 25 | 26 | 26 | 23 | 100 | |
CLEAR VOICE | Water label | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 10 |
Rice label | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 10 | |
Total | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 120 | |
- Determine the age of the label (<5, 5 - 10, >10)
AGE * FAR Crosstabulation
Count
DISTANT | Total | ||||
Chiang Kai-shek | Branch S? | What is this? | Song Ma Town | ||
1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
3 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 9 |
4 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 7 |
5 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 15 |
6 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
7 | 6 | 8 | 2 | 5 | 21 |
AGE OF HUMANITY | |||||
8 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 17 |
9 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
13 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 9 |
17 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
19 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 9 |
20 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 11 |
Total | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 120 |
- Determine the number of times nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and manure are applied to the surveyed households.
Nitrogen fertilizer
so lan bon N * XA Crosstabulation
Count
DISTANT | Total | ||||
Chiang Kai-shek | Branch S? | What is this? | Song Ma Town | ||
1 | 29 | 30 | 30 | 28 | 117 |
four times N | |||||
2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
Total | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 120 |
Phosphate Fertilizer
Count
so lan bon P2O5 *XA Crosstabulation
DISTANT | Total | ||||
Chiang Kai-shek | Branch S? | What is this? | Song Ma Town | ||
2 | 12 | 11 | 11 | 14 | 48 |
3 | 10 | 13 | 13 | 8 | 44 |
P2O5 density | |||||
4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 13 |
5 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 15 |
Total | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 120 |
Potassium Fertilizer
Count
K2O * XA Crosstabulation
DISTANT | Total | ||||
Chiang Kai-shek | Branch S? | What is this? | Song Ma Town | ||
1 | 28 | 29 | 29 | 27 | 113 |
K2O cube | |||||
2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
Total | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 120 |
Manure
Count
Four-part Crosstabulation
DISTANT | Total | |||||
Chiang Kai-shek | Branch S? | What is this? | Song Ma Town | |||
Four times the number of CHAPTERS | 1 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 120 |
Total | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 120 | |
- Determine the time to apply Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Potassium and Manure in the surveyed households.
Four-N * XA Crosstabulation Time
Count
DISTANT | Total | ||||
Chiang Kai-shek | Branch S? | What is this? | Song Ma Town | ||
Ladder 3 | 10 | 30 | 22 | 16 | 77 |
four N time | |||||
Ladder 4 | 20 | 0 | 8 | 14 | 43 |
Total | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 120 |
Phosphate Fertilizer
Count
P2O5 * XA Crosstabulation time
DISTANT | Total | |||||
Chiang Kai-shek | Branch S? | What is this? | Song Ma Town | |||
Ladder 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
Ladder 2 | 27 | 30 | 28 | 23 | 108 | |
P2O5 time | Ladder 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
Ladder 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
Ladder 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
Total | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 120 | |
Potassium Fertilizer
Count
K2O * XA Crosstabulation time
DISTANT | Total | ||||
Chiang Kai-shek | Branch S? | What is this? | Song Ma Town | ||
Ladder 3 | 29 | 30 | 12 | 15 | 86 |
K2O time | |||||
Ladder 4 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 15 | 34 |
Total | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 120 |
Manure Fertilization
Count
Four-part time * XA Crosstabulation
DISTANT | Total | |||||
Chiang Kai-shek | Branch S? | What is this? | Song Ma Town | |||
Time of the four parts CHUONG | August | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 120 |
Total | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 120 | |
- Determine the amount of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Potassium and Manure applied to the surveyed households.
Mass N * XA Crosstabulation
Count
DISTANT | Total | |||||
Chiang Kai-shek | Branch S? | What is this? | Song Ma Town | |||
50 | 13 | 29 | 13 | 1 | 56 | |
Weight N | 60 | 11 | 0 | 7 | 24 | 42 |
75 | 6 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 22 | |
Total | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 120 | |
Mass P2O5 * XA Crosstabulation
Count
DISTANT | Total | |||||
Chiang Kai-shek | Branch S? | What is this? | Song Ma Town | |||
400 | 8 | 13 | 8 | 3 | 32 | |
Mass of P2O5 | 450 | 19 | 14 | 19 | 23 | 75 |
500 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 13 | |
Total | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 120 | |
K2O Mass * XA Crosstabulation
Count
DISTANT | Total | ||||
Chiang Kai-shek | Branch S? | What is this? | Song Ma Town | ||
10 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 13 | 46 |
12 | 11 | 11 | 10 | 9 | 41 |
K2O mass | |||||
13 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
15 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 32 |
Total | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 120 |
Volume of CHAPTER * XA Crosstabulation
Count
DISTANT | Total | ||||
Chiang Kai-shek | Branch S? | What is this? | Song Ma Town | ||
2500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
3000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
5000 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 14 | 62 |
CHAPTER Volume | |||||
6000 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 |
6500 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 44 |
7000 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
Total | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 120 |
Descriptive Statistics
N | Minimum | Maximum | Mean | Std. Deviation | |
LAM CO | 30 | 30 | 35 | 33.67 | 2,249 |
SPRAYING | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30.00 | .000 |
FOUR PARTS | 30 | 15 | 20 | 19.33 | 1,729 |
HARVEST | 30 | 45 | 55 | 46.67 | 2,733 |
WATCHING BEAM | 30 | 20 | 25 | 22.33 | 2,537 |
Valid N (listwise) | 30 |
Chieng So
Descriptive Statistics
N | Minimum | Maximum | Mean | Std. Deviation | |
LAM CO | 30 | 25 | 35 | 31.67 | 3.304 |
SPRAYING | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30.00 | .000 |
FOUR PARTS | 30 | 15 | 20 | 19.33 | 1,729 |
HARVEST | 30 | 45 | 55 | 47.17 | 2,842 |
WATCHING BEAM | 30 | 20 | 25 | 23.33 | 2,397 |
Valid N (listwise) | 30 |
Na Nghiu
Descriptive Statistics
N | Minimum | Maximum | Mean | Std. Deviation | |
LAM CO | 30 | 30 | 35 | 30.83 | 1,895 |
SPRAYING | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30.00 | .000 |
FOUR PARTS | 30 | 15 | 20 | 19.00 | 2,034 |
HARVEST | 30 | 0 | 55 | 47.17 | 2,842 |
WATCHING BEAM | 30 | 20 | 20 | 20.00 | .000 |
Valid N (listwise) | 30 |
Song Ma Town
Descriptive Statistics
N | Minimum | Maximum | Mean | Std. Deviation | |
LAM CO | 30 | 25 | 35 | 29.67 | 2,916 |
SPRAYING | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30.00 | .000 |
FOUR PARTS | 30 | 15 | 20 | 19.00 | 2,034 |
HARVEST | 30 | 0 | 55 | 49.33 | 2,537 |
WATCHING BEAM | 30 | 20 | 25 | 23.50 | 2,330 |
Valid N (listwise) | 30 |