in the three core zones of Kien Giang Biosphere Reserve, the second largest biosphere reserve among the eight biosphere reserves of Vietnam recognized by UNESCO. This is one of the strengths of the park's ecotourism development, clearly demonstrating the high biodiversity, as well as the typical ecosystems of UMT National Park.
Third, the Park has many addresses for ecotourism such as: bird area, bat area, primary cajuput forest, wild boar population, otters, monitor lizards, and especially Hoa Mai Lake fishing entertainment area... In addition, the U Minh Thuong revolutionary base preserves the tradition of fighting to defend the country, which is a unique condition for developing ecotourism.
Fourth, the cuisine of U Minh Thuong in the flood season is also one of the typical features of the Mekong Delta. Here, visitors can enjoy dishes that are only available in U Minh such as: grilled snakehead fish wrapped in raw vegetables, rice paper with tamarind fish sauce; grilled wild perch, 5-course processed catfish, sesban flowers, linh fish, three-striped crab... with rice wine from the Mekong Delta, expressing a unique identity that needs to be preserved.
Fifth, although UMT ecotourism has only been implemented since 2004, the service style of the Management Board and staff is quite good, creating sympathy for tourists, and environmental education is also given due attention. This is also one of the strengths that helps U Minh Thuong National Park develop ecotourism well.
Maybe you are interested!
-
Solutions for tourism development in Tien Lang - 10
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism, tourism development
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
- District People's Committees and authorities of communes with tourist attractions should support, promote, and provide necessary information to people, helping them improve their knowledge about tourism. Raise tourism awareness for local people.
*
* *
Due to limited knowledge and research time, the thesis inevitably has shortcomings. Therefore, I look forward to receiving guidance from teachers, experts as well as your comments to make the thesis more complete.
Chapter III Conclusion
Through the issues presented in Chapter II, we can come to some conclusions:
Based on the strengths of available tourism resources, the types of tourism in Tien Lang that need to be promoted in the coming time are sightseeing and resort tourism, discovery tourism, weekend tourism. To improve the quality and diversify tourism products, Tien Lang district needs to combine with local cultural tourism resources, at the same time combine with surrounding areas, build rich tourism products. The strengths of Tien Lang tourism are eco-tourism and cultural tourism, so developing Tien Lang tourism must always go hand in hand with restoring and preserving types of cultural tourism resources. Some necessary measures to support and improve the efficiency of exploiting tourism resources in Tien Lang are: strengthening the construction of technical facilities and labor force serving tourism, actively promoting and advertising tourism, and expanding forms of capital mobilization for tourism development.
CONCLUDE
I Conclusion
1. Based on the results achieved within the framework of the thesis's needs, some basic conclusions can be drawn as follows:
Tien Lang is a locality with great potential for tourism development. The relatively abundant cultural tourism resources and ecological tourism resources have great appeal to tourists. Based on this potential, Tien Lang can build a unique tourism industry that is competitive enough with other localities within Hai Phong city and neighboring areas.
In recent years, the exploitation of the advantages of resources to develop tourism and build tourist routes in Tien Lang has not been commensurate with the available potential. In terms of quantity, many resource objects have not been brought into the purpose of tourism development. In terms of time, the regular service time has not been extended to attract more visitors. Infrastructure and technical facilities are still weak. The labor force is still thin and weak in terms of expertise. Tourism programs and routes have not been organized properly, the exploitation content is still monotonous, so it has not attracted many visitors. Although resources have not been mobilized much for tourism development, they are facing the risk of destruction and degradation.
2. Based on the results of investigation, analysis, synthesis, evaluation and selective absorption of research results of related topics, the thesis has proposed a number of necessary solutions to improve the efficiency of exploiting tourism resources in Tien Lang such as: promoting the restoration and conservation of tourism resources, focusing on investment and key exploitation of ecotourism resources, strengthening the construction of infrastructure and tourism workforce. Expanding forms of capital mobilization. In addition, the thesis has built a number of tourist routes of Hai Phong in which Tien Lang tourism resources play an important role.
Exploiting Tien Lang tourism resources for tourism development is currently facing many difficulties. The above measures, if applied synchronously, will likely bring new prospects for the local tourism industry, contributing to making Tien Lang tourism an important economic sector in the district's economic structure.
REFERENCES
1. Nhuan Ha, Trinh Minh Hien, Tran Phuong, Hai Phong - Historical and cultural relics, Hai Phong Publishing House, 1993
2. Hai Phong City History Council, Hai Phong Gazetteer, Hai Phong Publishing House, 1990.
3. Hai Phong City History Council, History of Tien Lang District Party Committee, Hai Phong Publishing House, 1990.
4. Hai Phong City History Council, University of Social Sciences and Humanities, VNU, Hai Phong Place Names Encyclopedia, Hai Phong Publishing House. 2001.
5. Law on Cultural Heritage and documents guiding its implementation, National Political Publishing House, Hanoi, 2003.
6. Tran Duc Thanh, Lecture on Tourism Geography, Faculty of Tourism, University of Social Sciences and Humanities, VNU, 2006
7. Hai Phong Center for Social Sciences and Humanities, Some typical cultural heritages of Hai Phong, Hai Phong Publishing House, 2001
8. Nguyen Ngoc Thao (editor-in-chief, Tourism Geography, Hai Phong Publishing House, two volumes (2001-2002)
9. Nguyen Minh Tue and group of authors, Hai Phong Tourism Geography, Ho Chi Minh City Publishing House, 1997.
10. Nguyen Thanh Son, Hai Phong Tourism Territory Organization, Associate Doctoral Thesis in Geological Geography, Hanoi, 1996.
11. Decision No. 2033/QD – UB on detailed planning of Tien Lang town, Hai Phong city until 2020.
12. Department of Culture, Information, Hai Phong Museum, Hai Phong relics
- National ranked scenic spot, Hai Phong Publishing House, 2005. 13. Tien Lang District People's Committee, Economic Development Planning -
Culture - Society of Tien Lang district to 2010.
14.Website www.HaiPhong.gov.vn
APPENDIX 1
List of national ranked monuments
STT
Name of the monument
Number, year of decisiondetermine
Location
1
Gam Temple
938 VH/QĐ04/08/1992
Cam Khe Village- Toan Thang commune
2
Doc Hau Temple
9381 VH/QĐ04/08/1992
Doc Hau Village –Toan Thang commune
3
Cuu Doi Communal House
3207 VH/QĐDecember 30, 1991
Zone II of townTien Lang
4
Ha Dai Temple
938 VH/QĐ04/08/1992
Ha Dai Village –Tien Thanh commune
APPENDIX II
STT
Name of the monument
Number, year of decision
Location
1
Phu Ke Pagoda Temple
178/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Zone 1 - townTien Lang
2
Trung Lang Temple
178/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Zone 4 – townTien Lang
3
Bao Khanh Pagoda
1900/QD-UBAugust 24, 2006
Nam Tu Village -Kien Thiet commune
4
Bach Da Pagoda
1792/QD-UB11/11/2002
Hung Thang Commune
5
Ngoc Dong Temple
177/QD-UBNovember 27, 2005
Tien Thanh Commune
6
Tomb of Minister TSNhu Van Lan
2848/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2003
Nam Tu Village -Kien Thiet commune
7
Canh Son Stone Temple
2160/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2003
Van Doi Commune –Doan Lap
8
Meiji Temple
2259/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2002
Toan Thang Commune
9
Tien Doi Noi Temple
477/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2005
Doan Lap Commune
10
Tu Doi Temple
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Doan Lap Commune
11
Duyen Lao Temple
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Tien Minh Commune
12
Dinh Xuan Uc Pagoda
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Bac Hung Commune
13
Chu Khe Pagoda
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Hung Thang Commune
14
Dong Dinh
2848/QD-UBNovember 21, 2002
Vinh Quang Commune
15
President's Memorial HouseTon Duc Thang
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
NT Quy Cao
Ha Dai Temple
Ben Vua Temple
Tien Lang hot spring
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 16pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 6pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 12pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
Identify Rating Levels and Rating Scales
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism,quan lan,quang ninh,ecology,ecotourism,minh chau,van don,geography,geographical basis,tourism development,science
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
of the islanders. Therefore, this indicator will be divided into two sub-indicators:
a1. Natural tourism attractiveness a2. Cultural tourism attractiveness
b. Tourist capacity
The two island communes in Quan Lan have different capacities to receive tourists. Minh Chau Commune is home to many standard hotels and resorts, attracting high-income domestic and international tourists. Meanwhile, Quan Lan Commune has many motels mainly built and operated by local people, so the scale and quality are not high, and will be suitable for ordinary tourists such as students.
c. Time of exploitation of Quan Lan Island Commune:
Quan Lan tourism is seasonal due to weather and climate conditions and festivals only take place on certain days of the year, specifically in spring. In Quan Lan commune, the period from April to June and from September to November is considered the best time to visit Quan Lan because the cultural tourism activities are mainly associated with festivals taking place during this time.
Minh Chau island commune:
Tourism exploitation time is all year round, because this is a place with a number of tourist attractions with diverse ecosystems such as Bai Tu Long National Park Research Center, Tram forest, Turtle Laying Beach, so besides coming to the beach for tourism and vacation in the summer, Minh Chau will attract research groups to come for tourism combined with research at other times of the year.
d. Sustainability
The sustainability of ecotourism sites in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes depends on the sensitivity of the ecosystems to climate changes.
landscape. In general, these tourist destinations have a fairly high level of sustainability, because they are natural ecosystems, planned and protected. However, if a large number of tourists gather at certain times, it can exceed the carrying capacity and affect the sustainability of the environment (polluted beaches, damaged trees, animals moving away from their habitats, etc.), then the sustainability of the above ecosystems (natural ecosystems, human ecosystems) will also be affected and become less sustainable.
e. Location and accessibility
Both island communes have ports to take tourists to visit from Van Don wharf:
- Quan Lan – Van Don traffic route:
Phuc Thinh – Viet Anh high-speed boat and Quang Minh high-speed boat, depart at 8am and 2pm from Van Don to Quan Lan, and at 7am and 1pm from Quan Lan to Van Don. There are also wooden boats departing at 7am and 1pm.
- Van Don - Minh Chau traffic route:
Chung Huong high-speed train, Minh Chau train, morning 7:30 and afternoon 13:30 from Van Don to Minh Chau, morning 6:30 and afternoon 13:00 from Minh Chau to Van Don.
f. Infrastructure
Despite receiving investment attention, the issue of infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism on Quan Lan Island is still an issue that needs to be resolved because it has a direct impact on the implementation of ecotourism activities. The minimum conditions for serving tourists such as accommodation, electricity, water, communication, especially medical services, and security work need to be given top priority. Ecotourism spots in Minh Chau commune are assessed to have better infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism because there are quite complete and synchronous conditions for serving tourists, meeting many needs of domestic and foreign tourists.
3.2.1.4. Determine assessment levels and assessment scales
Corresponding to the levels of each criterion, the index is the score of those levels in the order of 4, 3, 2, 1 decreasing according to the standard of each level: very attractive (4), attractive (3), average (2), less attractive (1).
3.2.1.5. Determining the coefficients of the criteria
For the assessment of DLST in the two communes of Quan Lan and Minh Chau islands, the students added evaluation coefficients to show the importance of the criteria and indicators as follows:
Coefficient 3 with criteria: Attractiveness, Exploitation time. These are the 2 most important criteria for attracting tourists to tourism in general and eco-tourism in particular, so they have the highest coefficient.
Coefficient 2 with criteria: Capacity, Infrastructure, Location and accessibility . Because the assessment area is an island commune of Van Don district, the above criteria are selected by the author with appropriate coefficients at the average level.
Coefficient 1 with criteria: Sustainability. Quan Lan has natural and human-made ecotourism sites, with high biodiversity and little impact from local human factors. Most of the ecotourism sites are still wild, so they are highly sustainable.
3.2.1.6. Results of DLST assessment on Quan Lan island
a. Assessment of the potential for natural tourism development
For Minh Chau commune:
+ Natural tourism attractiveness is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined as average (2 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of Capacity criterion is 2 x 2 = 4.
+ Exploitation time is long (4 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Exploitation time criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is assessed as good (3 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 3 x 2 = 6 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Minh Chau commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 4 + 12 + 4 + 4 + 6 = 42 points
Similar assessment for Quan Lan commune, we have the following table:
Table 3.3: Assessment of the potential for natural ecotourism development in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of self-tourismof course
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
CommuneMinh Chau
12
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
42/52
Quan CommuneLan
6
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
33/52
b. Assessment of the potential for humanistic tourism development
For Quan Lan commune:
+ The attractiveness of human tourism is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined to be large (3 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Capacity criterion is 3 x 2 = 6.
+ Mining time is average (3 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Mining time criterion is 3 x 3 = 9.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points.
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is rated as average (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Quan Lan commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 6 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 4 = 36 points.
Similar assessment with Minh Chau commune we have the following table:
Table 3.4: Assessment of the potential for developing humanistic eco-tourism in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of human tourismliterature
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Quan CommuneLan
12
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
39/52
Minh CommuneChau
6
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
36/52
Basically, both Minh Chau and Quan Lan localities have quite favorable conditions for developing ecotourism. However, Quan Lan commune has more advantages to develop ecotourism in a humanistic direction, because this is an area with many famous historical relics such as Quan Lan Communal House, Quan Lan Pagoda, Temple worshiping the hero Tran Khanh Du, ... along with local festivals held annually such as the wind praying ceremony (March 15), Quan Lan festival (June 10-19); due to its location near the port and long exploitation time, the beaches in Quan Lan commune (especially Quan Lan beach) are no longer hygienic and clean to ensure the needs of tourists coming to relax and swim; this is also an area with many beautiful landscapes such as Got Beo wind pass, Ong Phong head, Voi Voi cave, but the ability to access these places is still very limited (dirt hill road, lots of gravel and rocks), especially during rainy and windy times; In addition, other natural resources such as mangrove forests and sea worms have not been really exploited for tourism purposes and ecotourism development. On the contrary, Minh Chau commune has more advantages in developing ecotourism in the direction of natural tourism, this is an area with diverse ecosystems such as at Rua De Beach, Bai Tu Long National Park Conservation Center...; Minh Chau beach is highly appreciated for its natural beauty and cleanliness, ranked in the top ten most beautiful beaches in Vietnam; Minh Chau commune is also home to Tram forest with a large area and a purity of up to 90%, suitable for building bridges through the forest (a very effective type of natural ecotourism currently applied by many countries) for tourists to sightsee, as well as for the purpose of studying and researching.
Figure 3.1: Thenmala Forest Bridge (India) Source: https://www.thenmalaecotourism.com/(August 21, 2019)
3.2.2. Using SWOT matrix to evaluate Quan Lan island tourism
General assessment of current tourism activities of Quan Lan island is shown through the following SWOT matrix:
Table 3.5: SWOT matrix evaluating tourism activities on Quan Lan island
Internal agent
Strengths- There is a lot of potential for tourism development, especially natural ecotourism and humanistic ecotourism.- The unskilled labor force is relatively abundant.- resource environmentunpolluted, still
Weaknesses- Poorly developed infrastructure, especially traffic routes to tourist destinations on the island.- The team of professional staff is still weak.- Tourism products in general
quite wild, originalintact
general and DLST in particularalone is monotonous.
External agents
Opportunity- Tourism is a key industry in the socio-economic development strategy of the province and Van Don economic zone.- Quan Lan was selected as a pilot area for eco-tourism development within the framework of the green growth project between Quang Ninh province and the Japanese organization JICA.- The flow of tourists and especially ecotourism in the world tends toincreasing
Challenge- Weather and climate change abnormally.- Competition in tourism products is increasingly fierce, especially with other localities in the province such as Ha Long, Mong Cai...- Awareness of tourists, especially domestic tourists, about ecotourism and nature conservation is not high.
Through summary analysis using SWOT matrix we see that:
To exploit strengths and take advantage of opportunities, it is necessary to:
- Diversify products and service types (build more tourism routes aimed at specific needs of tourists: experiential tourism immersed in nature, spiritual cultural tourism...)
- Effective exploitation of resources and differentiated products (natural resources and human resources)
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: #0D0D0D; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -3pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Symbol, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:Wingdings; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:Cambria, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: #212121; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
Proposing solutions to contribute to preserving and developing Thang Long Tu Tran into a unique tourism product of Hanoi - 11 -
Research on potential and solutions for developing ecotourism in some key tourist areas of the North Central region - 30 -
Some Solutions for Developing Ecotourism in Co To in a Sustainable Direction
2.4.1.2. Weaknesses
First , on tourism resource exploitation management.

- Although U Minh Thuong National Park possesses rich and diverse natural tourism resources, up to now it has not been exploited commensurate with that potential, showing that the tourism product system of UMT is still poor and monotonous.
- Up to now, natural tourism resources have not been statistically evaluated, classified and ranked for sustainable and effective exploitation management. Leading to
There are many ecotourism resources but they are exploited indiscriminately, only superficially, exploiting what is available without promoting the value of the resources.
- The indiscriminate exploitation and depletion of tourism resources associated with the competition process and unclear responsibilities of the parties lead to the risk of rapid degradation of resource value. The conflict of economic interests between economic entities and industries, short-term vision and limited technology lead to the destruction and misuse of some tourism resources, negatively affecting sustainable tourism development.
Second, about infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism
- The infrastructure system to access the destination is still poor and unsynchronized. Currently, to reach U Minh Thuong National Park, international tourists can hardly come by air and there are only 2 international airports in Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City. In addition, the road, railway and river systems that bring tourists to UMT are not synchronized and generally of low quality, and there is no connection into a network. Therefore, infrastructure obstacles continue to be a weakness that requires long-term investment for UMT tourist destinations in particular and Vietnam in general.
- In particular, U Minh Thuong National Park does not have tourist accommodation services, tourism products are still small, unsynchronized, and unprofessional operations, so it has not formed a tourist area system in Kien Giang province with a prominent brand, although it is an attractive destination for domestic and foreign tourists.
Third, about tourism human resources
- This is truly a long-term weakness not only for U Minh Thuong National Park but also for Vietnam's tourism industry. Although UMT has made many efforts in developing tourism human resources in the past, especially from 2004 to present. However, compared to the requirements for professionalism of the modern and integrated tourism industry today, the tourism human resources of U Minh Thuong National Park have not yet met the requirements of professional skills and connection with tourist destinations in the region.
- Although the tourism workforce is large, the proportion of people with professional tourism training is low, mostly from intermediate and college levels, only 15 people have university degrees.
Thus, the general quality of human resources for ecotourism in U Minh Thuong National Park has not yet met the requirements of professionalism, management skills, communication and service quality. The foreign language proficiency of tourism staff is generally low. The team of professional tour guides dedicated to the ecotourism of the National Park and corresponding to the languages of the target market is still not fully ready.
Fourth, on product and market development
- Ecotourism products of U Minh Thuong National Park generally have their own characteristics, however, tourism products are slow to innovate to suit the needs of tourists. Most ecotourism products exploit available resources or copy to form tourism products, so they overlap with some other tourist attractions in the region such as: fishing, boating, sightseeing... relatively similar. Therefore, the uniqueness, original value and ideas of tourism products of UMT National Park are very poor and overlap with many other National Parks in Kien Giang province in particular and the whole country in general.
- Market segmentation research to determine the target market for ecotourism development in U Minh Thuong National Park has not really received attention. It mostly serves general purposes and has not yet brought in large profits at the target market stage.
- In addition, the promotion of ecotourism in U Minh Thuong National Park is not professional, systematic, and effective; it only stops at promoting the general image, and has not created a resonance and specific appeal for each product and tourism brand. That is why it has not attracted the foreign tourist market.
Fifth, on capital and technology
- The demand for investment in ecotourism in U Minh Thuong National Park is very large while capital and technology resources are still relatively limited.
- The self-reliance in technology, engineering and high-quality human resources of U Minh Thuong National Park is still very limited and depends on external joint venture partners.
2.4.2. Opportunities and challenges
2.4.2.1. Opportunities
-Firstly , the world's economic, political and security developments have a stronger impact as Vietnam integrates more deeply and comprehensively. Vietnam has joined the World Trade Organization (WTO). Globalization is an objective trend, attracting countries and territories, promoting cooperation while increasing competitive pressure and interdependence. Bilateral and multilateral relations are increasingly expanded in economic, cultural, social, environmental activities and common issues towards the millennium goals. The relations between Asia-Europe, America-Asia, Japan-ASEAN and the economies in APEC are increasingly developing in a positive direction.
- Second, Vietnam's active diplomatic relations with the world are opening up opportunities to attract capital and technology investment into Vietnam in general and tourism investment in particular. Major economies and international organizations are actively supporting Vietnam in the process of transforming the economy to a market mechanism, in which FDI and ODA investment flows for tourism development, especially ecotourism, are increasing.
- Third, U Minh Thuong National Park is an attractive destination for tourists in the future, with an increasing trend of international and domestic tourists. Ecotourism is increasingly developing, and tourists are choosing this type of tourism more and more.
- Fourth, integrating into the world economy, U Minh Thuong National Park is receiving many investment and development projects from within and outside the country. U Minh Thuong National Park is being invested in to serve the research and conservation of rare biological gene sources.
- Fifth, tourism in general and ecotourism in particular have become a popular trend globally, international tourism is constantly growing; intra-bloc tourism accounts for a large proportion; long-distance tourism tends to increase rapidly. Tourism has become one of the fastest growing and largest service economic sectors in the world, contributing to the development and prosperity of countries. Especially developing countries, remote areas consider tourism development as a tool for hunger eradication, poverty reduction and economic growth. This is a great opportunity in the trend of the times that Vietnam can take advantage of to develop all types of diverse tourism, taking advantage of tourism resources to quickly achieve development goals. In particular, the emerging trend of ecotourism is an opportunity to promote economic development for poor areas and people's lives in buffer zones that are still difficult such as U Minh Thuong National Park.
2.4.2.2. Challenges
- Firstly, Vietnam tourism in general and UMT ecotourism in particular will be strongly affected by political instability, conflicts, terrorism, epidemics, natural disasters, economic and financial crises in partner countries and traditional markets. As a member of the WTO, these negative impacts will be stronger and more unpredictable while Vietnam's ability to adapt and respond to market fluctuations is still limited. Regional disputes and disagreements, especially issues related to the East Sea, have a strong, direct and sudden impact on Vietnam's tourism activities. This is an overarching challenge in the process of global tourism integration, responding to economic crises, security and political instability on the international level.
- Second, the pressure of international and domestic competition is increasingly fierce. Ecotourism is a young type of tourism and has many weaknesses. In particular, ecotourism in U Minh Thuong National Park has just started operating since 2004, and experience in management and service is still quite weak. Competition between national parks and nature reserves in the Mekong Delta such as Tram Chim National Park, U Minh Ha... is becoming fiercer with scale. This competition is both in terms of investment capital and attracting
customers, both in terms of quality and business efficiency and building their own image and brand.
- Climate change is having a stronger impact than predicted. U Minh Thuong National Park is facing the threat of forest fires. Although forest fire prevention is always a top priority, prolonged drought and lack of irrigation water in the dry season are always concerns of the U Minh Forest Management Board.
- The world's tourism demand has changed a lot, towards new values established on the basis of traditional cultural values (uniqueness, originality), natural values (primitiveness, wildness), creative values and high technology (modernity, convenience). Sustainable tourism, green tourism, responsible tourism, community tourism associated with poverty reduction, tourism towards the roots, towards nature are prominent trends. Environmental quality has become an important factor constituting the value of tourism enjoyment.
This is a huge challenge in terms of perspective, awareness and technical expertise. If Vietnamese tourism in general and UMT ecotourism in particular do not catch up with this trend, they will face the risk of falling behind, losing market share and being ineffective. If tourists turn their backs on the destination, it will be a disaster.
CONCLUSION OF CHAPTER 2
U Minh Thuong National Park is one of the three core zones of Kien Giang Biosphere Reserve, and is the second largest Biosphere Reserve among the eight Biosphere Reserves of Vietnam recognized by UNESCO. With the highest biodiversity in the Mekong Delta, many rare and endangered species of flora and fauna need to be protected.
In addition to its high biodiversity, U Minh Thuong National Park also has a wild beauty, typical of the Mekong Delta. Coming to UMT, visitors can immerse themselves in rare natural scenery, immerse themselves in nature and enjoy the typical cuisine of the region. This is also the hometown of national hero Nguyen Trung Truc. UMT is and will be an attractive destination for domestic and foreign tourists.
Besides the attractive tourism resources, U Minh Thuong National Park has a system of technical facilities and services that are increasingly focused on completion.
However, U Minh Thuong National Park still has some difficulties and limitations that need to be addressed to improve service quality and increase attractiveness to tourists. These include tourist accommodation services, lack of facilities, difficult access, limited and monotonous tourism services, etc.
The number of visitors is increasing day by day but the revenue from tourism activities is still low, the weakness of tourism infrastructure is a worrying reality for the development of ecotourism in U Minh Thuong National Park.
Ecotourism with the nature of tourism that includes environmental education, conservation and contributes to the development of local communities will be suitable and should be encouraged to develop in U Minh Thuong National Park. Therefore, orientations and solutions for ecotourism in this National Park in the coming years are extremely necessary.
Chapter 3: ORIENTATION AND SOLUTIONS FOR DEVELOPING ECO-TOURISM IN U MINH THUONG NATIONAL PARK
3.1. Orientation of tourism development
U Minh Thuong National Park has great potential for ecotourism development, but tourism activities are still very limited and there is no plan for tourism development. Current research and orientations for ecotourism development will be an important premise for planning and organizing tourism management of U Minh Thuong National Park in the future. The main orientations for ecotourism development of U Minh Thuong National Park are determined on the basis of theories on ecotourism, experience in ecotourism development in national parks around the world and in Vietnam and analysis of potential, current status, strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and challenges in ecotourism development in the National Park, on the basis of the overall tourism development orientation of Kien Giang province in the period 2010-2020 approved by the provincial People's Committee. The orientations for ecotourism development of U Minh Thuong National Park are based on the actual conditions of tourism resources and development goals of U Minh Thuong National Park.
3.1.1. General objectives
The development of ecotourism in U Minh Thuong National Park needs to pay attention to the balance between three goals: Ensuring economic efficiency of tourism, nature conservation goals and community development goals.
- The economic efficiency of tourism is reflected in: The attractiveness and quality of tourism products and services; the economic benefits that tourism activities can bring.
- The goal of nature conservation is expressed in: Supporting conservation work and raising conservation awareness for the community and tourists; bringing environmental efficiency (protecting the natural environment and using resources effectively).
- The goal of supporting community development is to ensure the social effectiveness of ecotourism. This is reflected in: The ability to support the preservation of cultural and humanistic values and support the development of local communities.
In tourism planning and organizing tourism activities, it is necessary to ensure a balance between the three above objectives. Because there is a close relationship between them.





