4.3.2. Determine the weight of each evaluation criterion using AHP
Among the various multi-criteria analysis (MCDA) techniques, analytical hierarchy process (AHP) has been widely used in natural resource and environmental management. AHP is used to determine the weights of thematic classes (Saaty, 1980) and is used for decision making in which a problem is divided into different parameters, arranged in a hierarchical structure to make judgments about the relative importance of pairs of factors and summarize the results (Saaty 1999, 2004). For this analysis, nine thematic classes of visibility, forest status, protection level, slope, elevation, road accessibility, distance to tourist sites, and surface water accessibility were considered.
The results of the comparison of pairs based on expert opinions and reference documents are presented in Appendix 2. The results of the weight calculation for each factor are presented in Appendix 3.
From the data in Appendix 3, the topic calculates the parameters including the consistency index (CI), random index (RI) and consistency ratio (CR). The results are presented in Table 4.13.
Table 4.13. Indicator parameters
Parameter
Value | |
Consistency Index (CI) | 0.12 |
Random Index (RI) | 1.45 |
Consistency Ratio (CR) | 0.08 |
Maybe you are interested!
-
Identify Rating Levels and Rating Scales
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism,quan lan,quang ninh,ecology,ecotourism,minh chau,van don,geography,geographical basis,tourism development,science
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
of the islanders. Therefore, this indicator will be divided into two sub-indicators:
a1. Natural tourism attractiveness a2. Cultural tourism attractiveness
b. Tourist capacity
The two island communes in Quan Lan have different capacities to receive tourists. Minh Chau Commune is home to many standard hotels and resorts, attracting high-income domestic and international tourists. Meanwhile, Quan Lan Commune has many motels mainly built and operated by local people, so the scale and quality are not high, and will be suitable for ordinary tourists such as students.
c. Time of exploitation of Quan Lan Island Commune:
Quan Lan tourism is seasonal due to weather and climate conditions and festivals only take place on certain days of the year, specifically in spring. In Quan Lan commune, the period from April to June and from September to November is considered the best time to visit Quan Lan because the cultural tourism activities are mainly associated with festivals taking place during this time.
Minh Chau island commune:
Tourism exploitation time is all year round, because this is a place with a number of tourist attractions with diverse ecosystems such as Bai Tu Long National Park Research Center, Tram forest, Turtle Laying Beach, so besides coming to the beach for tourism and vacation in the summer, Minh Chau will attract research groups to come for tourism combined with research at other times of the year.
d. Sustainability
The sustainability of ecotourism sites in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes depends on the sensitivity of the ecosystems to climate changes.
landscape. In general, these tourist destinations have a fairly high level of sustainability, because they are natural ecosystems, planned and protected. However, if a large number of tourists gather at certain times, it can exceed the carrying capacity and affect the sustainability of the environment (polluted beaches, damaged trees, animals moving away from their habitats, etc.), then the sustainability of the above ecosystems (natural ecosystems, human ecosystems) will also be affected and become less sustainable.
e. Location and accessibility
Both island communes have ports to take tourists to visit from Van Don wharf:
- Quan Lan – Van Don traffic route:
Phuc Thinh – Viet Anh high-speed boat and Quang Minh high-speed boat, depart at 8am and 2pm from Van Don to Quan Lan, and at 7am and 1pm from Quan Lan to Van Don. There are also wooden boats departing at 7am and 1pm.
- Van Don - Minh Chau traffic route:
Chung Huong high-speed train, Minh Chau train, morning 7:30 and afternoon 13:30 from Van Don to Minh Chau, morning 6:30 and afternoon 13:00 from Minh Chau to Van Don.
f. Infrastructure
Despite receiving investment attention, the issue of infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism on Quan Lan Island is still an issue that needs to be resolved because it has a direct impact on the implementation of ecotourism activities. The minimum conditions for serving tourists such as accommodation, electricity, water, communication, especially medical services, and security work need to be given top priority. Ecotourism spots in Minh Chau commune are assessed to have better infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism because there are quite complete and synchronous conditions for serving tourists, meeting many needs of domestic and foreign tourists.
3.2.1.4. Determine assessment levels and assessment scales
Corresponding to the levels of each criterion, the index is the score of those levels in the order of 4, 3, 2, 1 decreasing according to the standard of each level: very attractive (4), attractive (3), average (2), less attractive (1).
3.2.1.5. Determining the coefficients of the criteria
For the assessment of DLST in the two communes of Quan Lan and Minh Chau islands, the students added evaluation coefficients to show the importance of the criteria and indicators as follows:
Coefficient 3 with criteria: Attractiveness, Exploitation time. These are the 2 most important criteria for attracting tourists to tourism in general and eco-tourism in particular, so they have the highest coefficient.
Coefficient 2 with criteria: Capacity, Infrastructure, Location and accessibility . Because the assessment area is an island commune of Van Don district, the above criteria are selected by the author with appropriate coefficients at the average level.
Coefficient 1 with criteria: Sustainability. Quan Lan has natural and human-made ecotourism sites, with high biodiversity and little impact from local human factors. Most of the ecotourism sites are still wild, so they are highly sustainable.
3.2.1.6. Results of DLST assessment on Quan Lan island
a. Assessment of the potential for natural tourism development
For Minh Chau commune:
+ Natural tourism attractiveness is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined as average (2 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of Capacity criterion is 2 x 2 = 4.
+ Exploitation time is long (4 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Exploitation time criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is assessed as good (3 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 3 x 2 = 6 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Minh Chau commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 4 + 12 + 4 + 4 + 6 = 42 points
Similar assessment for Quan Lan commune, we have the following table:
Table 3.3: Assessment of the potential for natural ecotourism development in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of self-tourismof course
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
CommuneMinh Chau
12
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
42/52
Quan CommuneLan
6
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
33/52
b. Assessment of the potential for humanistic tourism development
For Quan Lan commune:
+ The attractiveness of human tourism is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined to be large (3 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Capacity criterion is 3 x 2 = 6.
+ Mining time is average (3 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Mining time criterion is 3 x 3 = 9.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points.
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is rated as average (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Quan Lan commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 6 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 4 = 36 points.
Similar assessment with Minh Chau commune we have the following table:
Table 3.4: Assessment of the potential for developing humanistic eco-tourism in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of human tourismliterature
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Quan CommuneLan
12
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
39/52
Minh CommuneChau
6
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
36/52
Basically, both Minh Chau and Quan Lan localities have quite favorable conditions for developing ecotourism. However, Quan Lan commune has more advantages to develop ecotourism in a humanistic direction, because this is an area with many famous historical relics such as Quan Lan Communal House, Quan Lan Pagoda, Temple worshiping the hero Tran Khanh Du, ... along with local festivals held annually such as the wind praying ceremony (March 15), Quan Lan festival (June 10-19); due to its location near the port and long exploitation time, the beaches in Quan Lan commune (especially Quan Lan beach) are no longer hygienic and clean to ensure the needs of tourists coming to relax and swim; this is also an area with many beautiful landscapes such as Got Beo wind pass, Ong Phong head, Voi Voi cave, but the ability to access these places is still very limited (dirt hill road, lots of gravel and rocks), especially during rainy and windy times; In addition, other natural resources such as mangrove forests and sea worms have not been really exploited for tourism purposes and ecotourism development. On the contrary, Minh Chau commune has more advantages in developing ecotourism in the direction of natural tourism, this is an area with diverse ecosystems such as at Rua De Beach, Bai Tu Long National Park Conservation Center...; Minh Chau beach is highly appreciated for its natural beauty and cleanliness, ranked in the top ten most beautiful beaches in Vietnam; Minh Chau commune is also home to Tram forest with a large area and a purity of up to 90%, suitable for building bridges through the forest (a very effective type of natural ecotourism currently applied by many countries) for tourists to sightsee, as well as for the purpose of studying and researching.
Figure 3.1: Thenmala Forest Bridge (India) Source: https://www.thenmalaecotourism.com/(August 21, 2019)
3.2.2. Using SWOT matrix to evaluate Quan Lan island tourism
General assessment of current tourism activities of Quan Lan island is shown through the following SWOT matrix:
Table 3.5: SWOT matrix evaluating tourism activities on Quan Lan island
Internal agent
Strengths- There is a lot of potential for tourism development, especially natural ecotourism and humanistic ecotourism.- The unskilled labor force is relatively abundant.- resource environmentunpolluted, still
Weaknesses- Poorly developed infrastructure, especially traffic routes to tourist destinations on the island.- The team of professional staff is still weak.- Tourism products in general
quite wild, originalintact
general and DLST in particularalone is monotonous.
External agents
Opportunity- Tourism is a key industry in the socio-economic development strategy of the province and Van Don economic zone.- Quan Lan was selected as a pilot area for eco-tourism development within the framework of the green growth project between Quang Ninh province and the Japanese organization JICA.- The flow of tourists and especially ecotourism in the world tends toincreasing
Challenge- Weather and climate change abnormally.- Competition in tourism products is increasingly fierce, especially with other localities in the province such as Ha Long, Mong Cai...- Awareness of tourists, especially domestic tourists, about ecotourism and nature conservation is not high.
Through summary analysis using SWOT matrix we see that:
To exploit strengths and take advantage of opportunities, it is necessary to:
- Diversify products and service types (build more tourism routes aimed at specific needs of tourists: experiential tourism immersed in nature, spiritual cultural tourism...)
- Effective exploitation of resources and differentiated products (natural resources and human resources)
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: #0D0D0D; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -3pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Symbol, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:Wingdings; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:Cambria, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: #212121; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
Bank Card Business Evaluation Criteria -
Evaluation Results of Cvno Service Quality Criteria and Individual Customer Satisfaction Level for Bidv -
Content, Evaluation Criteria and Factors Affecting the Development of Border Gate Economic Zones -
Quality Evaluation Criteria of ECG Signal Recognition Model
The results from table 4.13 show that the consistency ratio CR is 0.08 which is less than 0.1 so it is acceptable.
4.3.3. Building a map of ecotourism potential
The map of potential ecotourism areas in Cat Ba National Park was built based on GIS application and the weight of thematic layers. The results of very suitable, suitable and less suitable areas are presented in table 4.14 and figure 4.46.
Table 4. 14. Results of assessing the potential for ecotourism in Cat Ba National Park
Classify
Result value Evaluate | Area (ha) | Rate (%) | |
Not suitable | 0 - 1 | 0 | 0.0 |
Less suitable | 1 - 2 | 7,242.90 | 41.7 |
Fits just right | 2 - 3 | 9,676.04 | 55.7 |
High fit | 3 - 4 | 444.02 | 2.6 |
Total | 17,362.96 | 100 |
The results from Table 4.14 and Figure 4.46 show that the project has identified 3 potential areas for ecotourism in Cat Ba National Park. The highly suitable area accounts for about 444.02 ha (2.6%), the total area of the National Park. More than half of the area of 9,676.04 ha (55.7%) of the National Park is suitable. The less suitable area is 7,242.90 ha (41.7%).
4.4. Community awareness and attitude towards ecotourism development and biodiversity conservation
4.4.1. Demographic characteristics
The investigation of demographic characteristics is extremely important in the research of the topic. The number of questionnaires expected to be conducted with local people is 155 (n=155). Through this, we can see the characteristics of labor gender, distribution of people by age group, main ethnic groups, community members by occupational groups... in Cat Ba National Park. Demographic characteristics are presented specifically in Table 4.15.
135

Figure 4. 46. Map of ecotourism potential in Cat Ba National Park
Source: Le Thi Ngan, 2021
Table 4.15. Sociological profile of interviewees
Characteristic
Number | Percentage | |
Gender (n=155) | ||
Male | 96 | 62 |
Female | 59 | 38 |
Age (n=155) | ||
15 – 25 | 8 | 5.16 |
25 – 35 | 35 | 22.58 |
35 – 45 | 41 | 26.45 |
45 – 55 | 43 | 27.4 |
55 – 65 | 19 | 12.26 |
>65 | 9 | 5.81 |
Ethnicity (n=155) | ||
Terrible | 155 | 100 |
Other | 0 | 0 |
Occupation (n=155) | ||
Tourism activities | 32 | 20.65 |
Agriculture | 26 | 16.77 |
State | 33 | 21.9 |
Housewife | 5 | 3.23 |
Work for hire | 11 | 7.1 |
Free | 38 | 24.52 |
Retirement | 5 | 3.23 |
Other | 5 | 3.23 |
Education level (n=155) | ||
Below the common | 20 | 13 |
12/12 | 80 | 52 |
College, university | 55 | 35 |
The analysis of sociological characteristics of the interviewees is presented in Table 4.15 with 155 people surveyed. In terms of gender, men accounted for more than 96/155 people, accounting for 62%, women accounted for less than 59/155 people, accounting for 38% of the total number of respondents. The majority of respondents were of working age, 146/155 people, accounting for 94.19%, of which 54.2% were young workers under 45 years old, which proves that the majority of people coming to ecotourism activities are young workers and can also be explained by the fact that ecotourism here is in a strong development stage, along with the development of ecotourism activities of the people, which is gradually attracting young people to participate. In terms of religion, 100% of the interviewees were Kinh ethnic group. In terms of education level, 100% of respondents were literate, 13% had less than high school education, 52% had 12/12, and only 32% had college or university degrees. In terms of occupation, the number of people who were self-employed accounted for the highest percentage at 24.52%. Next was the number of people working for the government at 21.59%. The number of people participating in tourism activities in Cat Ba National Park accounted for about 20.65% of the total number of people interviewed. Some occupations such as housewives, retired people, and other jobs accounted for the lowest percentage at about 3.23%.
4.4.2. Level of community participation in ecotourism activities
4.4.2.1. Level of community participation in local ecotourism development
The author uses the Pretty scale to measure the level of community participation in local ecotourism development, from the lowest level of non-participation to the highest level of real participation with a questionnaire designed with check boxes for each level. Accordingly, the surveyor will guide people to select only their highest level of participation to avoid duplication in responses. The author uses software to analyze descriptive statistics and analyze the frequency of each level of participation. The results of data processing on the level of community participation in local ecotourism development are presented in (Figure 4.47).
Level 7
Level 6
Level 5
Level 4
9.3%
Level 3
9.3%
Level 2
12.5%
12.5%
Level 1
15.6%
12.5%
28.1%
Figure 4.47. Level of community participation in local ecotourism development
- Level 1: The community is informed about tourism development but does not participate in giving opinions.
- Level 2: The community provides information or answers questions related to the development of local tourism services when consulted by external agencies and organizations, but this information is not responded to or checked.
- Level 3: The community is consulted on ecotourism development but does not participate in the decision-making process.
- Level 4: The community participates in working in tourism businesses; providing goods and food for businesses; providing tourism services spontaneously.
- Level 5: The community participates in management groups; art groups, culinary groups, guidance groups, local specialty production groups under the supervision of the government or external organizations.
- Level 6: The community owns tourism businesses, participates in the analysis and planning process, and contributes to decision-making related to the development of local tourism services.
- Level 7: The community takes the initiative and proactively seeks outside help, retains control, makes decisions, invests in and expands tourism businesses.
The interview results showed that a total of 32 people said they were participating in tourism activities at 7 different levels. In general, the community in Cat Ba National Park is mostly participating at a passive level, not autonomously, specifically:
- The results show that 28.1% of people participate in tourism activities at level 1, the largest of the 7 levels. This is a passive level, the community depends heavily on the government or organization, and has no autonomy in tourism development. Most of the participants at level 1 are single-family tourism businesses, ranging from individuals to families. The investment capital is small, spontaneous, and depends on the family's inherent conditions, with little expansion investment.
- Levels 2, 3, 4, and 5 have a fairly even number of participants, from 12.5% to 15.6%. Initially, Cat Ba National Park ecotourism is developing well, and the community is gradually being given more rights in participating in contributing to the overall tourism development of the locality. This also shows that the level and skills of the people in tourism are increasingly improving, this factor is very important in developing community-based tourism.
- The participation level at level 6 and level 7 accounts for the lowest rate with 9.3% for both levels. This shows that the community actively participating in tourism has limited financial autonomy and the right to decide on the development direction for business activities.
4.4.2.2.Tourism service provision activities
People's participation in the food service sector is quite high at 37%. Right after that is the motel business with 28%.
Next are some other types of services accounting for 14%. The tour guide type is still quite low with only 12% of people participating. Finally, the lowest is the souvenir selling type accounting for only 9%.
Service provision activities
tourism
Instruct
Motel business 28%
Other 14%
12% tourist
Food service 37%
Souvenir sales 9%
Figure 4.48. Diagram of community tourism service provision activities
Although there has been participation of local people in ecotourism activities, these activities are still insignificant compared to the actual potential, but initially it has made people aware of the benefits from these ecotourism activities.
In general, local people living in Cat Ba National Park tend to prioritize tourism-related occupations to ensure their household livelihoods and take advantage of local natural resources. However, these services are mostly spontaneous and copy each other in form. This results in a lack of professionalism in service provision. In addition, in small-scale private guesthouses and restaurants, which are mainly family-run, labor fluctuates frequently due to the seasonality of the tourism business.
4.4.3. Community awareness of the benefits of ecotourism
Community awareness of ecotourism activities is an important factor promoting ecotourism development as well as biodiversity protection in Cat Ba National Park.





