Correlation Between Some Clinical and Paraclinical Factors With Asmih Reduction


3.3.3. Correlation between some clinical and paraclinical factors with ASMIH reduction

Table 3.24. Logistic regression relationship between some clinical and paraclinical characteristics and reduced limb muscle mass in the diabetic group


Element

Number

patient

Univariate

Logistic regression



P

OR


95%CI


p

OR


95%CI

BMI < 23kg/m2


BMI 23kg

/m2

66/108


< 0.01


2.99

1.68 – 5.33


< 0.01


2.71

1.39 5.27


32/93

EXCUSE

No FORGIVENESS

82/146


> 0.05

1.08

0.58 – 2.01


> 0.05

0.68

0.27 1.71

16/55

Pills

Insulin/tablet

60/115


> 0.05

1.37

0.78 2.41


> 0.05

0.92

0.61 1.41

38/86

> 7.3mmol/l

< 7.3mmol/l

52/115


> 0.05

0.72

0.41 1.25


> 0.05

0.76

0.43 1.35

46/86

HbA1C ≥ 7.5%

HbA1C < 7.5%

61/113


> 0.05

1.61

0.92 2.83


> 0.05

1.01

0.55 1.84

37/88

Maybe you are interested!

Correlation Between Some Clinical and Paraclinical Factors With Asmih Reduction


Comment

In univariate and logistic regression analysis, BMI was an independent factor associated with the risk of muscle loss in patients with type 2 diabetes.


fairy

Type 2 diabetic patients with BMI < 23kg/m2 had a 3.753 times higher risk of muscle loss in univariate analysis and 2.715 times higher risk in multivariate analysis compared with type 2 diabetic patients with BMI > 23kg/m2.


Table 3.25. Relationship between limb muscle mass and some factors



Element

p

Correlation coefficient

BMI

< 0.001

0.447

HATTh

> 0.05

0.125

HATTr

> 0.05

0.008

Glucose

> 0.05

0.006

HbA1C

> 0.05

0.011


Comment: In the group of diabetic patients, there was a positive correlation between muscle mass and

and body mass index with p < 0.001 and correlation coefficient r = 0.447.


Male Female


Figure 3.9. Correlation between ASMIH and BMI by gender


Comment: At

group of diabetic patients

strong positive correlation

The correlation between limb muscle mass and BMI in both men and women was statistically significant p < 0.001, with r = 0.772 and r = 0.446.


3.3.4. The relationship between some clinical and paraclinical factors with reduced walking speed and hand strength in the diabetic group

Table 3.26. Correlation between some clinical and paraclinical characteristics and reduced walking speed of diabetic patients


Element

Number

patient

Univariate

Logistic regression



p

OR


95%CI


p

OR


95%CI

BMI < 23kg/m2


BMI 23kg/m2

37/108


> 0.05

1.27

0.70 2.31


> 0.05

1.04

0,561,94

27/93

EXCUSE

No FORGIVENESS

52/146


> 0.05

1.98

0.96 – 4.08


> 0.05

1.08

0.49 2.37

12/55

Pills

Insulin/tablet

33/115


> 0.05

0.71

0,391,29


> 0.05

0.97

0.66 1.42

31/86

Glucose >7.3 mmol/l

Glucose <7.3 mmol/l

38/115


> 0.05

1.13

0.62 2.07


> 0.05

0.79

0,471,33

26/86

HbA1C ≥ 7.5%

HbA1C < 7.5%

36/113


> 0.05

1.00

0.551.82


> 0.05

0.70

0,411,19

28/88

Comment

Logistic regression did not find any factors that were independent predictors of reduced walking speed in patients with type 2 diabetes.


Table 3.27. Logistic regression relationship between reduced hand strength and some clinical and paraclinical characteristics of diabetic patients


Element

Number


patient

Univariate

Logistic regression



p

OR


95%CI


p

OR


95%CI


BMI < 23kg/m2


BMI 23kg/m2

66/108


> 0.05

0.98


0.531.81


> 0.05

1.31


0,702,46

32/93

EXCUSE


No FORGIVENESS

82/146


> 0.05

0.87


0,441,71


> 0.05

0.52


0,211,29

16/55

Pills


Insulin/tablet

60/115


> 0.05

0.89


0,481,64


> 0.05

0.89


0.601.33

38/86

Glucose >7.3mmol/l


Glucose <7.3mmol/l

52/115


> 0.05

1.44


0.643.24


> 0.05

0.81


0,471,39

46/86

HbA1C ≥ 7.5%


HbA1C < 7.5%

61/113


> 0.05

1.72


0,913,24


> 0.05

1.05


0,601,84

37/88


Comment


In logistic regression, no factor was found.


which is the factor


fairy

independent of hand strength loss in patients with type 2 diabetes.


3.4. EVALUATION OF EFFECTIVENESS BY TRAINING

3.4.1. Clinical and paraclinical changes of the diabetes group before and after exercise

Table 3.28. Clinical and paraclinical characteristics of the group of patients participating in the study

Characteristic

Age: 64.8 ± 2.9 (years)

Number of patients

(n=56)

Proportion%

Time of disease detection (years)

5

13

23.2

> 5 10

21

37.5

> 10

22

39.3

BMI (kg/m2)

< 18.5

0

0.0

18.5 22.9

34

60.7

23 24.9

16

28.6

≥ 25

6

10.7

Blood pressure

Increase

47

83.9

Normal

9

16.1

Diabetes medication

Pills

34

60.7

Insulin

7

12.5

Pills and insulin

15

26.8

Blood glucose (mmol/l)



4.0 7.2

23

41.1

7.3 10.0

23

41.1

> 10.0

10

17.8

HbA1C (%)

> 8.5

9

16.1

7.5 8.5

21

37.5

≤ 7.5

26

46.4

Comment:

The exercise group had an equal duration of illness among the three groups. According to BMI classification, 60.7% of patients had normal body condition, 39.3% were overweight and obese. 83.9% of patients had hypertension and up to

56.1% of patients were taking tablets. 17.8% and HbA1C > 8.5% had 16.1%.

Only

blood glucose > 10.0mmol/l, yes

Table 3.29. Characteristics of clinical and paraclinical indicators


before and after training 12 months



Characteristic

Before

After

p

Weight (kg)

55.29 ± 6.71

55.79 ± 6.65

> 0.05

BMI (kg/m2)

22.68 ± 1.65

22.99 ± 1.79

> 0.05

TTh blood pressure

139.1 ± 7.7

131.5 ± 8.3

< 0.01

TTr blood pressure

87.2 ± 3.3

81.2 ± 5.2

< 0.01

Glucose (mmol/l)

8.42 ± 2.26

7.56 ± 1.18

< 0.05

HbA1C (%)

7.98 ± 1.28

7.16 ± 0.50

< 0.01

Triglycerides (mmol/l)

1.77 ± 0.75

1.45 ± 0.71

< 0.05



Cholesterol (mmol/l)

)


5.04 ± 1.14


4.54 ± 1.22


< 0.05

LDLC (mmol/l)

2.89 ± 0.89

2.24 ± 0.85

< 0.05

HDLC (mmol/l)

1.34 ± 0.65

1.54 ± 0.34

< 0.05

Comment:

Weight, glucose, HbA1C, LDLC and blood pressure indices decreased significantly after exercise compared to before exercise with p < 0.05 0.01.

HDLC index increased before compared with after exercise with p < 0.05.

BMI tended to increase but the difference was not statistically significant with p > 0.05.


Figure 3.10. Changes in blood glucose at times 0, 3, 6, 9, 12


month


Comment:

Fasting blood glucose values ​​decreased gradually over time. After 3 months, blood glucose values ​​decreased compared to before training, however, the difference was not statistically significant with p > 0.05. From 6 months after training, blood glucose values ​​continued to decrease and remained stable compared to before training. The difference was statistically significant with p < 0.001.


Figure 3.11. Changes in HbA1C before and after exercise, after 3, 6, 9, 12 months


Comment:


Blood HbA1C values ​​gradually decreased over time. After 3 months, blood HbA1c values ​​decreased compared to before training, the difference was not statistically significant with p < 0.01. From 6 months after training onwards, blood HbA1C values ​​continued to decrease and remained stable compared to before training. The difference was statistically significant with p < 0.001.

Comment


Agree Privacy Policy *