Training university students in process assessment skills in teaching biology in high schools - 18

76. Hoang Phe (1994), Vietnamese Dictionary , Social Sciences Publishing House.

77. Meier B. and Nguyen Van Cuong (2020), Modern teaching theory: Basis for innovation in teaching objectives, content and methods , Hanoi National University of Education.

78. Malecka B., Boud D., and Carless D. (2020). Eliciting, processing and enacting feedback: mechanisms for embedding student feedback literacy within the curriculum. Teach High Educ , 0(0), 1–15.

79. Nyquist JB (2003), The benefits of reconstruing feedback as a larger system of formative assessment: A meta-analysis , Vanderbilt University.

80. Brinko KT (1993). The Practice of Giving Feedback to Improve Teaching. J Higher Educ , 64(5), 574–593.

81. Govaerts M. (2015). Workplace-Based Assessment and Assessment for Learning: Threats to Validity. J Gr Med Educ , 7(2), 265–267.

82. William D. and Thompson M. (2007). Integrating assessment with learning: What will it take to make it work?. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

83. Cowie B. and Bell B. (1999). A Model of Formative Assessment in Science Education. Assess Education Princ Policy Pract , 6(1), 101–116.

84. Yorke M. (2003). Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice. High Education , 45(4), 477–501.

85. Cauley KM and McMillan JH (2010). Formative Assessment Techniques to Support Student Motivation and Achievement. Clear House AJ Educ Strategy Issues Ideas , 83(1), 1–6.

86. Andersson C. and Palm T. (2017). The impact of formative assessment on student achievement: A study of the effects of changes to classroom practice after a comprehensive professional development program. Learn Instr , 49, 92–102.

87. Gentrup S., Lorenz G., Kristen C., et al. (2020). Self-fulfilling prophecies in the classroom: Teacher expectations, teacher feedback and student achievement. Learn Instr , 66(November 2019), 101296.

88. Brink M. and Bartz DE (2017). Effective use of formative assessment by high school teachers. Practical Assessment, Res Eval , 22(8), 1–10.

89. Zimmerman BJ (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview.

Theory Practice , 41(2), 64–70.

90. Andrade H. (2012). Assessing learning. Learn Environ Whole Curriculum , 118–128.

91. Xiao Y. and Yang M. (2019). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: How formative assessment supports students' self-regulation in English language learning. System , 81, 39–49.

92. Wolters CA (2010). Self-regulated learning and the 21st century competencies. Univ Houst Dep Educ Psychol Consult en http//www hewlett org/uploads/Self_Regulated_Learning21st_Century_Competencies pdf .

93. Miller D. and Lavin F. (2007). “But now I feel I want to give it a try”: formative assessment, self-esteem and a sense of competence. Curric J , 18(1), 3–25.

94. Biggs J. (1999). What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning. High Educ Res Dev , 18(1), 57–75.

95. Shepard LA (1995). Using Assessment to Improve Learning. Educ Leadersh , 52(5), 38–43.

96. Heritage M. (2010), Formative assessment: Making it happen in the classroom , Corwin Press.

97. Nguyen Thi Phuong Nhung (2017), Training lesson design skills for university students majoring in primary education through project-based learning , PhD thesis, Vietnam Institute of Educational Sciences.

98. Dang Thanh Hung (2010). Identifying and assessing skills. Journal of Educational Sciences , 62, 25–28.

99. Tran Ba ​​Hoanh (1996), Teaching techniques , Education Publishing House, Hanoi.

100. Wragg EC (2005), The art and science of teaching and learning: The selected works of Ted Wragg , Routledge.

101. Kyriacou C. (2007), Essential teaching skills , Nelson Thornes.

102. Danielson C. (2007), Enhancing professional practice: a framework for teaching , Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development Alexandria, Virginia USA.

103. Stronge JH (2007), Qualities of effective teachers , ASCD.

104. Schafer W.D. (1991). Essential assessment skills in professional education of teachers. Educ Meas Issues Pract , 10(1), 3–6.

105. Petty G. (2009), Teaching to day: a practical guide , Nelson Thornes, United Kingdom.

106. Dave RH (1970), Developing and writing behavioral objectives , Educational Innovators Press.

107. Harrow AJ (1972), A taxonomy of the psychomotor domain: A guide for developing behavioral objectives , Addison-Wesley Longman Ltd.

108. Simpson EJ (1966). The Classification of Educational Objectives, Psychomotor Domain. .

109. Dreyfus SE and Dreyfus HL (1980), A five-stage model of the mental activities involved in directed skill acquisition , California Univ Berkeley Operations Research Center.

110. Ministry of Education and Training (2006), Decision on promulgating the framework program for university education in the field of Pedagogy at university level , Vietnam.

111. Dreyfus SE (2004). The five-stage model of adult skill acquisition. Bull Sci Technol Soc , 24(3), 177–181.


APPENDIX

LIST OF APPENDIXES


Appendix 1. QUESTIONNAIRE FOR BIOLOGY EDUCATION STUDENTS ...P2 Appendix 2. PRE- AND POST-EXPERIMENTAL TEST ..............................P5 Appendix 3. SELF-TRAINING EXERCISES ON PROCESS ASSESSMENT SKILLS.....P14

Appendix 4. SUGGESTED ANSWERS AND GUIDELINES FOR EVALUATING TRAINING TASKS AND TRAINING EXERCISES ..........................................................................P22

Appendix 1 .

QUESTIONNAIRE FOR BIOLOGY EDUCATION STUDENTS

( This questionnaire is only used for research to survey the level of awareness and ability to perform process assessment of 4th year students, personal information is completely confidential and answers are only used for research purposes )

A. Personal information:

1. Full name:

2. Faculty: Class:

School:

3. Contact information: Email: Phone: Facebook/Viber/Zalo:


B. Survey content

Question 1: In your opinion, what is process assessment in teaching?

………………………………………………………………………………………

………………………………………………………………………………………

……………………………………………………………………………………… Question 2: In your opinion, process assessment has the following characteristics: (You can choose multiple options by circling that option)

b. Takes place at the beginning or end of the teaching process

c. Done by teachers

d. Done by students

e. For the purpose of assessing students' learning outcomes

f. Provide evidence (reflective information)

feedback on student learning outcomes

a. Takes place throughout the teaching and learning process

l. Feedback information used by teachers

m. Feedback information used by students

n. Formative assessment is considered as the synthesis of the results of individual tests throughout the entire teaching and learning process.

o. Aims to improve quality

of the teaching process

Maybe you are interested!

Training university students in process assessment skills in teaching biology in high schools - 18

g. Provide evidence (feedback) on the effectiveness of teachers' teaching practices

Question 3: Circle the level you think you have achieved for each of the following skills (from level 1 (low) to level 5 (high))

1

Skills to determine testing and evaluation goals

1

2

3

4

5

2

Skills in choosing appropriate assessment forms/methods

with the purpose of evaluation

1

2

3

4

5

3

Assessment question design skills

1

2

3

4

5

4

Exercise design skills

1

2

3

4

5

5

Skills in setting evaluation criteria

1

2

3

4

5

6

Commenting skills

1

2

3

4

5

7

Skills to listen to feedback from students

1

2

3

4

5

8

Skills to collect evidence of qualifications, abilities, needs

of students (collect feedback)

1

2

3

4

5

9

The ability to use feedback to adjust performance

teaching by myself

1

2

3

4

5

Question 4: Please indicate which assessment skills you need to improve? (multiple options available)

a. Determine evaluation objectives

b. Design assessment questions/exercises/tasks that are appropriate to the objectives

c. Develop evaluation criteria

d. Feedback giving skills

c. Feedback collection skills

d. Skills in using feedback to adjust students' learning activities

e. Skills to use feedback to adjust one's own teaching activities

f. Other skills:

Question 5: Please tell us which courses in the program cover knowledge and skills on process assessment in teaching and how effective are those courses?

Course name

Number of credits

Study time (Study)

Period/Year)

Effectiveness - Please circle from 1 (low) to very effective.

5(high)

1




1

2

3

4

5

2




1

2

3

4

5

3




1

2

3

4

5

….




1

2

3

4

5

….




1

2

3

4

5

STT


Thank you very much for taking this survey!

Comment


Agree Privacy Policy *