UNION UNIVERSITY
Maybe you are interested!
-
Identify Rating Levels and Rating Scales
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism,quan lan,quang ninh,ecology,ecotourism,minh chau,van don,geography,geographical basis,tourism development,science
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
of the islanders. Therefore, this indicator will be divided into two sub-indicators:
a1. Natural tourism attractiveness a2. Cultural tourism attractiveness
b. Tourist capacity
The two island communes in Quan Lan have different capacities to receive tourists. Minh Chau Commune is home to many standard hotels and resorts, attracting high-income domestic and international tourists. Meanwhile, Quan Lan Commune has many motels mainly built and operated by local people, so the scale and quality are not high, and will be suitable for ordinary tourists such as students.
c. Time of exploitation of Quan Lan Island Commune:
Quan Lan tourism is seasonal due to weather and climate conditions and festivals only take place on certain days of the year, specifically in spring. In Quan Lan commune, the period from April to June and from September to November is considered the best time to visit Quan Lan because the cultural tourism activities are mainly associated with festivals taking place during this time.
Minh Chau island commune:
Tourism exploitation time is all year round, because this is a place with a number of tourist attractions with diverse ecosystems such as Bai Tu Long National Park Research Center, Tram forest, Turtle Laying Beach, so besides coming to the beach for tourism and vacation in the summer, Minh Chau will attract research groups to come for tourism combined with research at other times of the year.
d. Sustainability
The sustainability of ecotourism sites in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes depends on the sensitivity of the ecosystems to climate changes.
landscape. In general, these tourist destinations have a fairly high level of sustainability, because they are natural ecosystems, planned and protected. However, if a large number of tourists gather at certain times, it can exceed the carrying capacity and affect the sustainability of the environment (polluted beaches, damaged trees, animals moving away from their habitats, etc.), then the sustainability of the above ecosystems (natural ecosystems, human ecosystems) will also be affected and become less sustainable.
e. Location and accessibility
Both island communes have ports to take tourists to visit from Van Don wharf:
- Quan Lan – Van Don traffic route:
Phuc Thinh – Viet Anh high-speed boat and Quang Minh high-speed boat, depart at 8am and 2pm from Van Don to Quan Lan, and at 7am and 1pm from Quan Lan to Van Don. There are also wooden boats departing at 7am and 1pm.
- Van Don - Minh Chau traffic route:
Chung Huong high-speed train, Minh Chau train, morning 7:30 and afternoon 13:30 from Van Don to Minh Chau, morning 6:30 and afternoon 13:00 from Minh Chau to Van Don.
f. Infrastructure
Despite receiving investment attention, the issue of infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism on Quan Lan Island is still an issue that needs to be resolved because it has a direct impact on the implementation of ecotourism activities. The minimum conditions for serving tourists such as accommodation, electricity, water, communication, especially medical services, and security work need to be given top priority. Ecotourism spots in Minh Chau commune are assessed to have better infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism because there are quite complete and synchronous conditions for serving tourists, meeting many needs of domestic and foreign tourists.
3.2.1.4. Determine assessment levels and assessment scales
Corresponding to the levels of each criterion, the index is the score of those levels in the order of 4, 3, 2, 1 decreasing according to the standard of each level: very attractive (4), attractive (3), average (2), less attractive (1).
3.2.1.5. Determining the coefficients of the criteria
For the assessment of DLST in the two communes of Quan Lan and Minh Chau islands, the students added evaluation coefficients to show the importance of the criteria and indicators as follows:
Coefficient 3 with criteria: Attractiveness, Exploitation time. These are the 2 most important criteria for attracting tourists to tourism in general and eco-tourism in particular, so they have the highest coefficient.
Coefficient 2 with criteria: Capacity, Infrastructure, Location and accessibility . Because the assessment area is an island commune of Van Don district, the above criteria are selected by the author with appropriate coefficients at the average level.
Coefficient 1 with criteria: Sustainability. Quan Lan has natural and human-made ecotourism sites, with high biodiversity and little impact from local human factors. Most of the ecotourism sites are still wild, so they are highly sustainable.
3.2.1.6. Results of DLST assessment on Quan Lan island
a. Assessment of the potential for natural tourism development
For Minh Chau commune:
+ Natural tourism attractiveness is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined as average (2 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of Capacity criterion is 2 x 2 = 4.
+ Exploitation time is long (4 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Exploitation time criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is assessed as good (3 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 3 x 2 = 6 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Minh Chau commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 4 + 12 + 4 + 4 + 6 = 42 points
Similar assessment for Quan Lan commune, we have the following table:
Table 3.3: Assessment of the potential for natural ecotourism development in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of self-tourismof course
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
CommuneMinh Chau
12
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
42/52
Quan CommuneLan
6
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
33/52
b. Assessment of the potential for humanistic tourism development
For Quan Lan commune:
+ The attractiveness of human tourism is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined to be large (3 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Capacity criterion is 3 x 2 = 6.
+ Mining time is average (3 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Mining time criterion is 3 x 3 = 9.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points.
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is rated as average (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Quan Lan commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 6 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 4 = 36 points.
Similar assessment with Minh Chau commune we have the following table:
Table 3.4: Assessment of the potential for developing humanistic eco-tourism in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of human tourismliterature
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Quan CommuneLan
12
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
39/52
Minh CommuneChau
6
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
36/52
Basically, both Minh Chau and Quan Lan localities have quite favorable conditions for developing ecotourism. However, Quan Lan commune has more advantages to develop ecotourism in a humanistic direction, because this is an area with many famous historical relics such as Quan Lan Communal House, Quan Lan Pagoda, Temple worshiping the hero Tran Khanh Du, ... along with local festivals held annually such as the wind praying ceremony (March 15), Quan Lan festival (June 10-19); due to its location near the port and long exploitation time, the beaches in Quan Lan commune (especially Quan Lan beach) are no longer hygienic and clean to ensure the needs of tourists coming to relax and swim; this is also an area with many beautiful landscapes such as Got Beo wind pass, Ong Phong head, Voi Voi cave, but the ability to access these places is still very limited (dirt hill road, lots of gravel and rocks), especially during rainy and windy times; In addition, other natural resources such as mangrove forests and sea worms have not been really exploited for tourism purposes and ecotourism development. On the contrary, Minh Chau commune has more advantages in developing ecotourism in the direction of natural tourism, this is an area with diverse ecosystems such as at Rua De Beach, Bai Tu Long National Park Conservation Center...; Minh Chau beach is highly appreciated for its natural beauty and cleanliness, ranked in the top ten most beautiful beaches in Vietnam; Minh Chau commune is also home to Tram forest with a large area and a purity of up to 90%, suitable for building bridges through the forest (a very effective type of natural ecotourism currently applied by many countries) for tourists to sightsee, as well as for the purpose of studying and researching.
Figure 3.1: Thenmala Forest Bridge (India) Source: https://www.thenmalaecotourism.com/(August 21, 2019)
3.2.2. Using SWOT matrix to evaluate Quan Lan island tourism
General assessment of current tourism activities of Quan Lan island is shown through the following SWOT matrix:
Table 3.5: SWOT matrix evaluating tourism activities on Quan Lan island
Internal agent
Strengths- There is a lot of potential for tourism development, especially natural ecotourism and humanistic ecotourism.- The unskilled labor force is relatively abundant.- resource environmentunpolluted, still
Weaknesses- Poorly developed infrastructure, especially traffic routes to tourist destinations on the island.- The team of professional staff is still weak.- Tourism products in general
quite wild, originalintact
general and DLST in particularalone is monotonous.
External agents
Opportunity- Tourism is a key industry in the socio-economic development strategy of the province and Van Don economic zone.- Quan Lan was selected as a pilot area for eco-tourism development within the framework of the green growth project between Quang Ninh province and the Japanese organization JICA.- The flow of tourists and especially ecotourism in the world tends toincreasing
Challenge- Weather and climate change abnormally.- Competition in tourism products is increasingly fierce, especially with other localities in the province such as Ha Long, Mong Cai...- Awareness of tourists, especially domestic tourists, about ecotourism and nature conservation is not high.
Through summary analysis using SWOT matrix we see that:
To exploit strengths and take advantage of opportunities, it is necessary to:
- Diversify products and service types (build more tourism routes aimed at specific needs of tourists: experiential tourism immersed in nature, spiritual cultural tourism...)
- Effective exploitation of resources and differentiated products (natural resources and human resources)
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: #0D0D0D; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -3pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Symbol, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:Wingdings; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:Cambria, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: #212121; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
Summary of Hue Tourist Destination Attributes Associated with 10% of Tourists (Unit: Guest) -
Means of Transporting Tourists to Tourist Destinations. -
Typical Natural Tourist Landscapes -
Solutions to attract foreign tourists to return to Vietnam: case study of SaPa tourist area - 14
NGUYEN VIET ANH

TOURIST PARTICIPATION IN PROTECTING THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT AT SA PA TOURIST AREA, LAO CAI PROVINCE
MASTER'S THESIS IN SOCIOLOGY
CODE: 831 03 01
SCIENTIFIC INSTRUCTOR: ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR, DR. DO THI VAN ANH
HANOI, 2021
COMMITMENT
I hereby certify that the Master's thesis "Tourists' participation in protecting the natural environment at Sa Pa tourist area, Lao Cai province" is an independent research work conducted by the author under the guidance of Associate Professor, Dr. Do Thi Van Anh . The thesis has not been published in any research work. The data and content presented in the thesis are honest, have clear origin, are valid and ensure compliance with regulations on intellectual property protection.
I am responsible for the entire content of this master's thesis.
Author
Nguyen Viet Anh
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
In fact, there is no success without support, help, little or much, whether directly or indirectly, from others. During the time from the beginning of studying at school until now, I have received a lot of help from teachers, family and friends.
To complete this thesis, besides my own efforts, I have received great encouragement and support from many individuals and groups. First of all, I would like to express my sincere thanks to the teachers in the Faculty of Sociology, the Faculty of Postgraduate Studies and the Board of Directors of the Trade Union University for providing me with a favorable learning and research environment during the past two years of study and research.
I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Associate Professor, Dr. Do Thi Van Anh - Trade Union University for her enthusiastic guidance, help and advice during my thesis.
I would also like to express my gratitude to the People's Committee of Sa Pa town, the Department of Natural Resources and Environment of Sa Pa town for creating favorable conditions to provide me with useful reports and documents for me to carry out this thesis. I would also like to thank the Party Committee, the Board of Directors, and the leaders of the Administration and General Department of Thai Nguyen University Branch in Lao Cai province where I am working for creating the best favorable conditions for me to participate in studying and completing my master's thesis.
Finally, I would like to express my gratitude to my relatives, family, friends, and colleagues who have always encouraged and created favorable conditions for me to complete this thesis.
Thank you very much!
INDEX
Commitment Acknowledgements Table of Contents
List of abbreviations List of tables and charts
INTRODUCTION 1
1. Urgency of the topic 1
2. Overview of research problem 3
3. Research purpose and tasks 8
4. Subject, object and scope of research 9
5. Research methods 9
6. Scientific and practical significance 11
7. Research Questions, Research Hypotheses 12
8. Theoretical framework 12
9. Structure of the thesis 13
Chapter 1. THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL BASIS OF TOURIST PARTICIPATION IN PROTECTING THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT 14
1.1. Tool concepts 14
1.1.1. Concept of participation 14
1.1.2. Concept of tourist 16
1.1.3. Concept of natural environment 16
1.1.4. Concept of environmental protection 17
1.1.5. The concept of tourist participation in protecting the natural environment 18
1.2. Theories applied in research 19
1.2.1. Social action theory 19
1.2.2. Symbolic interaction theory 20
1.3. Characteristics of the research area 22
1.3.1. Characteristics of natural conditions 22
1.3.2. Characteristics of tourism and environment 24
Chapter 1 Summary 29
Chapter 2. CURRENT STATE OF TOURISTS PARTICIPATING IN PROTECTING THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT AT SAPA – LAO CAI TOURIST AREA 30
2.1. Current level of awareness and attitude of tourists towards environmental protection 30
2.1.1. Tourists' awareness level of environmental pollution caused by tourism 30
2.1.2. Attitudes and awareness of environmental pollution behavior 35
2.1.3. Level of understanding of the importance of protecting the natural environment 39
2.1.4. Awareness of the role and significance of protecting the natural environment 42
2.1.5. Awareness of the state's environmental protection policy 45
2.2. Situation of tourists participating in environmental protection in SaPa - Lao Cai 47
2.2.1. Direct activities 47
2.2.2. Indirect activities 54
Chapter 2 Summary 58
Chapter 3. FACTORS AFFECTING TOURISTS' PARTICIPATION IN PROTECTING THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT AT SA PA TOURIST AREA - LAO CAI 58
3.1. Factors from the state and local authorities 59
3.2. Factors from travel companies 63
3.3. Factors from tourists 66
3.3.1. Education level 66
3.3.2. Age 73
3.3.3. Occupation 79
3.3.4. Gender 81
Summary of chapter 3 85
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 86
LIST OF REFERENCES 91
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1.1: Number of tourists in Sa Pa in the period 2010-2019 27
Table 2.1: Level of awareness of the impact of tourism on the natural environment by gender 31
Table 2.2: Level of awareness of the impact of tourism on the natural environment by education level 33
Table 2.3: Level of awareness of the impact of tourism on the natural environment by age 34
Table 2.4: Level of awareness of the impact of tourism on the natural environment by occupation 35
Table 2.5: Assessment of the importance of sharing environmental protection information on social networking sites by age 41
Table 2.6: Tourists' level of understanding of the state's tourism development policy associated with ecotourism development on factor 46
Table 3.1: Level of participation in waste collection activities of tourists in Sa Pa based on educational level 68
Table 3.2: Level of participation in littering activities of tourists in Sa Pa based on age factor 69
Table 3.3: Level of participation in using environmentally friendly products during tourism in Sa Pa by tourists on factor 70
Table 3.4: Level of participation in using environmentally friendly means of transport during tourism in Sa Pa by tourists based on educational level 71
Table 3.5: Level of participation of tourists in environmental protection propaganda for other tourists based on educational level 72
Table 3.6: Level of participation in waste collection activities of tourists in Sa Pa based on age factor 73
Table 3.7: Level of participation in littering activities of tourists in Sa Pa based on age factor 74
Table 3.8: Level of participation in using environmentally friendly products during tourism in Sa Pa by tourists based on age factor.. 75
Table 3.9: Level of participation in using environmentally friendly means of transport during tourism in Sa Pa by age factor 76
Table 3.10. Level of participation in environmental protection propaganda for other tourists by age factor 77
Table 3.11: Level of participation in sharing information about environmental protection on social networking sites of tourists in Sa Pa 78
Table 3.12: Level of participation in littering activities of tourists in Sa Pa based on occupational factors 79
Table 3.13: Level of participation in using environmentally friendly products during tourism in Sa Pa by tourists based on occupational factors 80
Table 3.14: Level of participation in using environmentally friendly means of transport during tourism in Sa Pa of tourists 82
LIST OF TABLES
Chart 2.1: Survey results on the level of awareness of the impact of tourism on the natural environment 30
Chart 2.2: Level of impact of environmental pollution behaviors (%)36 Chart 2.3: Survey results on tourists' attitudes towards environmental pollution behaviors (%)36
environmental pollution behavior 37
Chart 2.4: Survey results on tourists' attitudes towards using environmentally unfriendly products. 38
Chart 2.5: Survey results on tourists' awareness of environmental protection activities 39
Figure 2.6: Survey results on tourists' awareness of the importance of sharing environmental protection information on social networks 40
Chart 2.7: Survey results on tourists' awareness of the role and significance of protecting the natural environment for tourism development 43
Figure 2.8. Tourists' level of understanding of the state's environmental protection policies 45
Chart 2.9: Survey results on the participation of tourists in waste collection activities at Sa Pa Tourist Area 48
Chart 2.10: Survey results on the situation of tourists participating in the activity of throwing waste in the right place at Sa Pa Tourist Area .. 49
Chart 2.11: Survey results on the situation of tourists participating in using environmentally friendly products at Sa Pa Tourist Area. 50
Chart 2.12: Survey results on the use of environmentally friendly means of transport (bicycles, electric cars, walking) at Sa Pa Tourist Area by tourists 51
Chart 2.13: Survey results on the participation of tourists in cleaning up tourist areas at Sa Pa Tourist Area 53





