20
.170 | .680 | 97,510 | |||||||
21 | .158 | .631 | 98,141 | ||||||
22 | .143 | .572 | 98,713 | ||||||
23 | .119 | .474 | 99,187 | ||||||
24 | .108 | .431 | 99,618 | ||||||
25 | .096 | .382 | 100,000 | ||||||
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis. | |||||||||
Maybe you are interested!
-
Results of Reliability Test of Independent Variables Scale -
Brand Association Scale Reliability Test Results -
Preliminary Test of Reliability of Scale in Research Model -
Efa Results of the Quality of Working Life Scale -
Reliability of the PCGD Scale (First Test)
Adjusted factor rotation matrix (with variable dt4 removed) for the scale
Observation variable | Extractable factors | |||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
mt2 | .812 | |||||
mt5 | .796 | |||||
mt4 | .761 | |||||
mt3 | .760 | |||||
mt1 | .759 | |||||
kt1 | .812 | |||||
KT2 | .810 | |||||
KT3 | .780 | |||||
KT4 | .721 | |||||
cv4 | .871 | |||||
cv1 | .813 | |||||
cv3 | .742 | |||||
cv2 | .638 | |||||
lg2 | .773 | |||||
lg4
.707 | ||||||
lg1 | .665 | |||||
lg3 | .646 | |||||
dt1 | .821 | |||||
dt5 | .652 | |||||
dt3 | .630 | |||||
dt2 | .580 | |||||
ld3 | .796 | |||||
ld1 | .779 | |||||
ld2 | .658 | |||||
ld4 | .567 | |||||
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis. Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization. | ||||||
a Rotation converged in 6 iterations. | ||||||
APPENDIX 12: FACTOR ANALYSIS FOR DEPENDENT VARIABLES
KMO coefficient in Bartlett test for measurement scale
Sample fit coefficient (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin) | .771 | |
Bartlett test | Approx. Chi-Square | 663.27 7 |
df | 10,000 | |
Sig. | .000 | |
The results of factor formation and variance extracted for the scale
Factor | Primitive Eigenvalues | Extracted variance | ||||
Total | % variance extracted | % cumulative variance | Total | % variance | % cumulative variance | |
1 | 3,500 | 69,992 | 69,992 | 3,500 | 69,992 | 69,992 |
2 | .746 | 14,926 | 84,918 | |||
3 | .368 | 7,361 | 92,279 | |||
4 | .300 | 5,997 | 98,276 | |||
5 | .086 | 1,724 | 100,000 | |||
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis. | ||||||
Factor matrix
Observation variable | Factors |
1 | |
tt1 | .870 |
tt2 | .823 |
tt3 | .817 |
tt4 | .853 |
tt6 | .819 |
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis. | |
a. 1 components extracted. | |
APPENDIX 13: RESULTS OF RE-TESTING THE RELIABILITY OF THE SCALE AFTER EFA
13.1 Reliability testing of the “Salary and benefits” scale
Reliability statistics
Cronbach's Alpha | Number of observed variables |
.883 | 4 |
Variable statistics
Variable | Average value | Standard deviation | Number of variables | ||
lg1 | 3.4809 | .86977 | 183 | ||
lg2 | 3.3333 | .90986 | 183 | ||
lg3 | 3.3552 | .78416 | 183 | ||
lg4 | 3.2404 | 1.02018 | 183 | ||
Total variable statistics | |||||
Variable | Average ladder if variable | Variance of scale if variable | Total variable correlation | Cronbach's if variable type | |
lg1 | 9.9290 | 5,814 | .719 | .859 | |
lg2 | 10.0765 | 5,258 | .838 | .812 | |
lg3 | 10.0546 | 6.173 | .718 | .862 | |
lg4 | 10.1694 | 5.163 | .729 | .861 | |
Scale statistics
GTTB | Variation | Standard deviation | Number of variables |
13.4098 | 9,584 | 3.09578 | 4 |
13.2 Reliability testing of the “Training and development” scale
Reliability statistics
Cronbach's Alpha | Number of observed variables |
.815 | 4 |
Variable statistics
Variable | Average value | Standard deviation | Number of variables |
dt1 | 3.4098 | .99521 | 183 |
dt2 | 3.1093 | .94292 | 183 |
dt3 | 3.4426 | .94097 | 183 |
dt5 | 3.3716 | .94559 | 183 |
Total variable statistics
Variable | Scale mean if variable excluded | Variance of scale if variable | Total variable correlation | Cronbach's if variable type |
dt1 | 9.9235 | 5,478 | .634 | .769 |
dt2 | 10.2240 | 5,592 | .659 | .757 |
dt3 | 9.8907 | 5,757 | .615 | .777 |
dt5 | 9.9617 | 5,674 | .633 | .769 |
Scale statistics
GTTB | Variation | Standard deviation | Number of variables |
13.3333 | 9,421 | 3.06940 | 4 |
APPENDIX 14: RESULTS OF REGRESSION ANALYSIS
14.1 Statistical table describing the component elements
Observation variable
Total number of variables | Average Value | Standard deviation | |
CV | 183 | 3.5451 | .76115 |
LG | 183 | 3.3525 | .77395 |
MT | 183 | 3.3672 | .90555 |
KT | 183 | 3.2773 | .82372 |
DT | 183 | 3.3333 | .76735 |
LD | 183 | 3.4699 | .74526 |
TT | 183 | 3.1410 | .79228 |
Valid N (listwise) | 183 |
14.2 14.2 Pearson correlation coefficient matrix
Correlation coefficient
CV | LG | MT | KT | DT | LD | TT | ||
CV | Pearson correlation coefficient | 1,000 | .558** | .421** | .494** | .488** | .573** | .555** |
Significance level (Sig) | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | ||
Total observations | 183 | 183 | 183 | 183 | 183 | 183 | 183 | |
LG | Pearson correlation coefficient | .558** | 1,000 | .481** | .623** | .609** | .654** | .650** |
Significance level (Sig) | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | ||
Total observations | 183 | 183 | 183 | 183 | 183 | 183 | 183 | |