To avoid the above situations, the problem for businesses is to have a correct understanding of the current corporate culture of tourism companies in order to build a suitable culture and develop it throughout the organization. Therefore, the topic "Building and developing corporate culture of Vietnamese tourism companies" has very practical significance in both theory and practice.
2. Research situation
2.1. Research on corporate culture
On the content of corporate culture
Maybe you are interested!
-
Corporate Social Responsibility (Csr) Has Positive Impact on Building and Developing Corporate Culture -
Building a Policy for Developing Corporate Human Resources -
The relationship between social responsibility, green marketing strategy, corporate reputation and business performance - Research on tourism and travel businesses in Ho Chi Minh City - 24 -
Building Management Consulting Centers, Building and Developing Corporate Culture -
Identify Rating Levels and Rating Scales
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism,quan lan,quang ninh,ecology,ecotourism,minh chau,van don,geography,geographical basis,tourism development,science
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
of the islanders. Therefore, this indicator will be divided into two sub-indicators:
a1. Natural tourism attractiveness a2. Cultural tourism attractiveness
b. Tourist capacity
The two island communes in Quan Lan have different capacities to receive tourists. Minh Chau Commune is home to many standard hotels and resorts, attracting high-income domestic and international tourists. Meanwhile, Quan Lan Commune has many motels mainly built and operated by local people, so the scale and quality are not high, and will be suitable for ordinary tourists such as students.
c. Time of exploitation of Quan Lan Island Commune:
Quan Lan tourism is seasonal due to weather and climate conditions and festivals only take place on certain days of the year, specifically in spring. In Quan Lan commune, the period from April to June and from September to November is considered the best time to visit Quan Lan because the cultural tourism activities are mainly associated with festivals taking place during this time.
Minh Chau island commune:
Tourism exploitation time is all year round, because this is a place with a number of tourist attractions with diverse ecosystems such as Bai Tu Long National Park Research Center, Tram forest, Turtle Laying Beach, so besides coming to the beach for tourism and vacation in the summer, Minh Chau will attract research groups to come for tourism combined with research at other times of the year.
d. Sustainability
The sustainability of ecotourism sites in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes depends on the sensitivity of the ecosystems to climate changes.
landscape. In general, these tourist destinations have a fairly high level of sustainability, because they are natural ecosystems, planned and protected. However, if a large number of tourists gather at certain times, it can exceed the carrying capacity and affect the sustainability of the environment (polluted beaches, damaged trees, animals moving away from their habitats, etc.), then the sustainability of the above ecosystems (natural ecosystems, human ecosystems) will also be affected and become less sustainable.
e. Location and accessibility
Both island communes have ports to take tourists to visit from Van Don wharf:
- Quan Lan – Van Don traffic route:
Phuc Thinh – Viet Anh high-speed boat and Quang Minh high-speed boat, depart at 8am and 2pm from Van Don to Quan Lan, and at 7am and 1pm from Quan Lan to Van Don. There are also wooden boats departing at 7am and 1pm.
- Van Don - Minh Chau traffic route:
Chung Huong high-speed train, Minh Chau train, morning 7:30 and afternoon 13:30 from Van Don to Minh Chau, morning 6:30 and afternoon 13:00 from Minh Chau to Van Don.
f. Infrastructure
Despite receiving investment attention, the issue of infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism on Quan Lan Island is still an issue that needs to be resolved because it has a direct impact on the implementation of ecotourism activities. The minimum conditions for serving tourists such as accommodation, electricity, water, communication, especially medical services, and security work need to be given top priority. Ecotourism spots in Minh Chau commune are assessed to have better infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism because there are quite complete and synchronous conditions for serving tourists, meeting many needs of domestic and foreign tourists.
3.2.1.4. Determine assessment levels and assessment scales
Corresponding to the levels of each criterion, the index is the score of those levels in the order of 4, 3, 2, 1 decreasing according to the standard of each level: very attractive (4), attractive (3), average (2), less attractive (1).
3.2.1.5. Determining the coefficients of the criteria
For the assessment of DLST in the two communes of Quan Lan and Minh Chau islands, the students added evaluation coefficients to show the importance of the criteria and indicators as follows:
Coefficient 3 with criteria: Attractiveness, Exploitation time. These are the 2 most important criteria for attracting tourists to tourism in general and eco-tourism in particular, so they have the highest coefficient.
Coefficient 2 with criteria: Capacity, Infrastructure, Location and accessibility . Because the assessment area is an island commune of Van Don district, the above criteria are selected by the author with appropriate coefficients at the average level.
Coefficient 1 with criteria: Sustainability. Quan Lan has natural and human-made ecotourism sites, with high biodiversity and little impact from local human factors. Most of the ecotourism sites are still wild, so they are highly sustainable.
3.2.1.6. Results of DLST assessment on Quan Lan island
a. Assessment of the potential for natural tourism development
For Minh Chau commune:
+ Natural tourism attractiveness is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined as average (2 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of Capacity criterion is 2 x 2 = 4.
+ Exploitation time is long (4 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Exploitation time criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is assessed as good (3 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 3 x 2 = 6 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Minh Chau commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 4 + 12 + 4 + 4 + 6 = 42 points
Similar assessment for Quan Lan commune, we have the following table:
Table 3.3: Assessment of the potential for natural ecotourism development in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of self-tourismof course
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
CommuneMinh Chau
12
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
42/52
Quan CommuneLan
6
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
33/52
b. Assessment of the potential for humanistic tourism development
For Quan Lan commune:
+ The attractiveness of human tourism is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined to be large (3 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Capacity criterion is 3 x 2 = 6.
+ Mining time is average (3 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Mining time criterion is 3 x 3 = 9.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points.
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is rated as average (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Quan Lan commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 6 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 4 = 36 points.
Similar assessment with Minh Chau commune we have the following table:
Table 3.4: Assessment of the potential for developing humanistic eco-tourism in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of human tourismliterature
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Quan CommuneLan
12
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
39/52
Minh CommuneChau
6
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
36/52
Basically, both Minh Chau and Quan Lan localities have quite favorable conditions for developing ecotourism. However, Quan Lan commune has more advantages to develop ecotourism in a humanistic direction, because this is an area with many famous historical relics such as Quan Lan Communal House, Quan Lan Pagoda, Temple worshiping the hero Tran Khanh Du, ... along with local festivals held annually such as the wind praying ceremony (March 15), Quan Lan festival (June 10-19); due to its location near the port and long exploitation time, the beaches in Quan Lan commune (especially Quan Lan beach) are no longer hygienic and clean to ensure the needs of tourists coming to relax and swim; this is also an area with many beautiful landscapes such as Got Beo wind pass, Ong Phong head, Voi Voi cave, but the ability to access these places is still very limited (dirt hill road, lots of gravel and rocks), especially during rainy and windy times; In addition, other natural resources such as mangrove forests and sea worms have not been really exploited for tourism purposes and ecotourism development. On the contrary, Minh Chau commune has more advantages in developing ecotourism in the direction of natural tourism, this is an area with diverse ecosystems such as at Rua De Beach, Bai Tu Long National Park Conservation Center...; Minh Chau beach is highly appreciated for its natural beauty and cleanliness, ranked in the top ten most beautiful beaches in Vietnam; Minh Chau commune is also home to Tram forest with a large area and a purity of up to 90%, suitable for building bridges through the forest (a very effective type of natural ecotourism currently applied by many countries) for tourists to sightsee, as well as for the purpose of studying and researching.
Figure 3.1: Thenmala Forest Bridge (India) Source: https://www.thenmalaecotourism.com/(August 21, 2019)
3.2.2. Using SWOT matrix to evaluate Quan Lan island tourism
General assessment of current tourism activities of Quan Lan island is shown through the following SWOT matrix:
Table 3.5: SWOT matrix evaluating tourism activities on Quan Lan island
Internal agent
Strengths- There is a lot of potential for tourism development, especially natural ecotourism and humanistic ecotourism.- The unskilled labor force is relatively abundant.- resource environmentunpolluted, still
Weaknesses- Poorly developed infrastructure, especially traffic routes to tourist destinations on the island.- The team of professional staff is still weak.- Tourism products in general
quite wild, originalintact
general and DLST in particularalone is monotonous.
External agents
Opportunity- Tourism is a key industry in the socio-economic development strategy of the province and Van Don economic zone.- Quan Lan was selected as a pilot area for eco-tourism development within the framework of the green growth project between Quang Ninh province and the Japanese organization JICA.- The flow of tourists and especially ecotourism in the world tends toincreasing
Challenge- Weather and climate change abnormally.- Competition in tourism products is increasingly fierce, especially with other localities in the province such as Ha Long, Mong Cai...- Awareness of tourists, especially domestic tourists, about ecotourism and nature conservation is not high.
Through summary analysis using SWOT matrix we see that:
To exploit strengths and take advantage of opportunities, it is necessary to:
- Diversify products and service types (build more tourism routes aimed at specific needs of tourists: experiential tourism immersed in nature, spiritual cultural tourism...)
- Effective exploitation of resources and differentiated products (natural resources and human resources)
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: #0D0D0D; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -3pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Symbol, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:Wingdings; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:Cambria, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: #212121; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex
There are many different research works on corporate culture in the world today. Therefore, there are many other approaches to defining corporate culture, such as Hofstede (1991), Trice & Beyer (1993), Schultz (1995), Deal & Kennedy (1999), Cameron & Quinn (1999), Ashkanasy, Wilderom & Peterson (2000), Martin (2002) ... Recently, there are also authors who have given their own definitions of corporate culture such as Porter et al. (2016), Robbins and Judge (2018), Rooji and Fine (2018), Tahir et al. (2019), ... Each of the above approaches has its own characteristics to define and explain the concept of corporate culture, but that is a good sign of recognizing corporate culture as a category, a scientific concept. Denison, an author with many research works on this topic, also pointed out the view on the connotation of corporate culture and the factors that need to be considered when studying corporate culture in the works Denison (1990), Fey and Denison (2003), Denison et al. (2003), Denison et al. (2014), ... Researcher Schein (Organizational Culture and Leadership, 2004), an author specializing in research on the field of organizational culture and corporate culture, analyzed the common issues related to corporate culture and their relationship with leadership in the book "Corporate Culture and Leadership". In addition, there are many other studies on corporate culture such as "Conquering the cultural waves" by Trompenaars (1980), Studies on cultural differences at the international scale such as "Five dimensions of culture" by Hofstede (2010).
In Vietnam, the issue of corporate culture is also increasingly concerned. Author Nguyen Manh Quan (2012) wrote the textbook "Business Ethics and Corporate Culture", providing theories and philosophies on business ethics, as well as some theories on building a unique identity for businesses. Author Do Thi Phi Hoai (2009), author Nguyen Duc Chinh (2015) with a research work called "Corporate Culture"

"Business Culture", has proposed theories on corporate culture including concepts, levels of corporate culture, and the impact of corporate culture on business activities. Author Duong Thi Lieu (2012) is the editor of the textbook "Business Culture", inheriting previous research works, providing general theories on business culture and necessary skills to organize the application and development of knowledge about business culture in economic and business activities... In the scientific article titled "Assessing corporate culture in small and medium enterprises in Vietnam" published in the Science Journal, Hanoi National University, author Do Tien Long (2015) presented a typical study on culture assessment in small and medium enterprises in Vietnam.
These are the fundamental studies for the author to learn, inherit and synthesize a general concept of corporate culture in the thesis. The thesis will inherit these studies to synthesize the contents of corporate culture and from there study the actual corporate culture that Vietnamese tourism companies have built and developed. The detailed contents will be presented in chapter 2 of the thesis.
On the structure of corporate culture
When talking about the structure of corporate culture and reviewing theoretical studies on the levels of corporate culture, there are three main theories: Hall's iceberg model (1976), Schein's model (1985, 2010) and Hofstede's model (1991, 2010). The iceberg model is built on Hall's sociocultural iceberg model (1976), identifying corporate culture as consisting of two parts, visible and invisible, like an iceberg - or the visible and invisible elements. The model of corporate culture levels was proposed by Schein in his book "Restructuring Organizational Culture". Schein (2010) divided the elements of corporate culture into three groups: (1) the group of visible cultural values, (2) the announced values and (3) the group of implicit values. Later, Hogan and Coote (2014) also conducted their own research to use and evaluate the reliability of this model. At the same time Schein proposed the 3-level model of corporate culture, Hofstede (2010) proposed a model consisting of 4 layers in order from outside to inside: Symbols - Heroes - Rituals - Values. In general, the models have in common that corporate culture includes both tangible and intangible elements.
On methods of measuring and evaluating corporate culture
Schein (1989) proposed an interactive model - a 10-step interview method called “Collaborative Discovery through Interactive Interviewing”. After
In the interview, he also presented a way to analyze the collected data on implicit views, the fundamental values of corporate culture are evaluated on 5 aspects: (1) The relationship of the organization to nature, (2) The nature of reality and trust, the basis for decision making, (3) The nature of people, (4) The nature of human action, (5) The nature of human relationships.
With the research method using questionnaires with questions assessed by level, there are two commonly used methods: the OCI (Organizational Culture Inventory) method of Cooke & Lafferty (1987), the DOC (Denison Organizational Culture) model of Denison (1990), O'Reilly, Chatman and Caldwell (1991) also proposed the OCP (Organizational Culture Profile) method. This method is based on a questionnaire consisting of 54 affirmative sentences to identify the values and characteristics of an organization. Interview participants will be asked to answer based on a specific scale. According to this method, corporate culture is divided into 7 aspects: Innovation, Stability, Respect for individuals, Results orientation, Detail orientation, Team orientation and Competitiveness. The OCI method is a quantitative corporate culture analysis and assessment tool that allows quantification of corporate culture values clearly, built and developed. developed by Cooke and Lafferty (1987). Denison's corporate culture model is used by the Questionnaire when applying Denison's corporate culture model, which includes 12 aspects, these 12 aspects are classified into 4 main groups: Mission, Adaptability, Participation, Consistency. In this thesis, the author will use Denison's model (1990) to research and evaluate the corporate culture of Vietnamese tourism companies because of the popularity and reliability of this model.
2.2. Research on building and developing corporate culture
On the content of building and developing corporate culture
In general, building and developing corporate culture is a process of defining corporate values and sharing them widely to spread those values to members of the business. These two words often go hand in hand because when a business has built its culture, it will share, spread and strengthen this culture so that it becomes stronger and more influential to members of the business. There have been a number of studies on this issue such as: Denison (1990), Kotter & Heskett (1992), Gordon & DiTomaso (1992), Fey & Denison (2003), Denison et al. (2014). Or when talking about the steps to build and develop corporate culture, the authors
Authors Gostick and Elton (2015) also have a research work "Building corporate culture, 7 steps to success". In Vietnam, the book "Business ethics and corporate culture" by Bui Xuan Phong (2006) presents the concept, characteristics, manifestations of corporate culture, factors that create corporate culture; principles of building corporate culture... In addition, the work also presents culture in business activities such as marketing activities, culture in behavior, in negotiation and bargaining... These studies have shown the basic foundations of building and developing corporate culture.
Corporate culture as well as the building and development of corporate culture play an important role in creating a strong and suitable culture for the business. There have been many studies pointing out the importance of corporate culture to the performance of the business such as studies (Gordon, 1985; Schein, 1985; Barney, 1986; Denison, 1990, Calori & Samil, 1991; Kotter & Heskett, 1992; Gordon & DiTomaso, 1992; Denison & Neale, 1996). Authors Sadri & Lees (2001) also pointed out the need to develop corporate culture through studying the cases of Wal-mart, Southwest Ailines and HP. Building and developing a strong culture has an impact on the performance of the organization (Fey & Denison, 2003; Schein, 2010). Leaders will develop their corporate culture to improve corporate performance. (Flamholtz & Randle, 2011; O‟Reilly and Chatman, 1991). In particular, Denison & Neale (1996) pointed out the impact of aspects of corporate culture that can impact criteria in corporate performance. From there, businesses can choose to develop which aspects of corporate culture (mission, employee involvement, adaptability, consistency) to increase their performance. To improve and develop these aspects of corporate culture, business leaders can use human resource management tools to develop their corporate culture: recruitment and selection of employees, training and development, performance appraisal, rewards and incentives, and communication systems within the business to share, spread, and reinforce the values of corporate culture to members (Guest, 1987; Keyton, 2005).
In Vietnam, author Bui Xuan Phong (2010) published a number of research topics such as: "Maintaining and developing corporate culture for sustainable development and international integration of VNPT" (March 2010); "Discussing the process of building corporate culture" (April 2010); "Maintaining and developing corporate culture" (April 2010);
Developing corporate culture to develop VNPT sustainably and integrate internationally” (June 2010). These topics have applied the theory of corporate culture to Vietnamese enterprises, specifically VNPT, through assessing the current situation to propose solutions to help VNPT move towards sustainable development. In addition, there are also a number of master's theses researching corporate culture of some specific enterprises such as FPT, Viettel. Recently, there have also been a number of articles on developing corporate culture such as author Vi Tien Cuong (2012) with the article "Building corporate culture towards sustainable development of Vietnamese enterprises", author Duong Thi Thanh Mai (2015), "Building corporate culture in Vietnam - Current situation and solutions", author Nguyen Quang Trung (2015) with the article "Developing corporate culture in Vietnam: Proposing concepts and research models"; Author Le Hai Linh (2017) with the article "Building corporate culture in response to practical demands", author Phan Y Lan (2020) with the article "Building and developing corporate culture for enterprises in Vietnam in the digital transformation era". These articles have pointed out current issues and the importance of building and developing corporate culture today for enterprises.
On factors affecting the building and development of corporate culture
With scientific research articles in general and the topic of corporate culture in particular, current authors tend to study the factors affecting the research object to indicate appropriate development directions. With Schein (2004), he focused on studying organizational culture related to leadership, so his theory also focused on leaders. He raised the question of why two businesses in the same environment and the same business field can still have contrasting corporate culture, and from there found three main factors affecting the birth of corporate culture: (1) the values and beliefs of the founder, (2) the learning process in the team when the organization increasingly adapts and changes, (3) Communication to new leaders and employees. Schien also proposed 6 primary and secondary mechanisms for founders and managers in building corporate culture. In the study “The impact of strong corporate culture during a period of growth and acquisition”, Carmen (2014) pointed out both positive and negative impacts from external organizational changes on employee awareness and culture in a company, which also mentioned factors affecting corporate culture. Or Blum (1998) contributed to pointing out the leadership style factor and its impact on corporate culture through the study “A cause-and-effect
relationship between leadership and corporate culture: An educational perspective”. Another study called “Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on an Organization‟s Culture: A Multisite Case Study of a Global Nonprofit Organization” by Tracey and Odenwelder (2015) tested and studied small groups in the same non-profit organization, successfully demonstrating the role of social responsibility in the company's goals and missions, thereby positively affecting corporate culture. Discussing this content, Essounga (2009), Hofstede (2010), Tsui and Nifadkar (2007), Naraziana et al. (2014), Szczepańska and Kosiorek (2017), Naraziana et al. (2017), Ansah and Louw (2019) pointed out that national culture has an impact on corporate culture and values as well as the construction and development of corporate culture. In addition, founders and leaders over time, internal communication also have an impact on corporate culture and values as well as the construction and development of corporate culture according to studies by authors Toor and Ofori (2009), Flamholtz & Randle (2012), Andish et al. (2013), O'Reilly et al. (2014), Mumby (2013), Sebastião et al. (2017). Another factor that has an impact on corporate culture is imported culture or learned culture (Nguyen & Aoyama, 2014); Uddin et al., 2013).
In Vietnam, author Phung Xuan Nha (2010) has a state-level topic "Entrepreneurial personality and business culture in Vietnam in the process of innovation and international integration", building hierarchical structural models with a ladder of detailed values of entrepreneurial personality and Vietnamese business culture in the period of innovation and international integration, thereby drawing lessons for Vietnam, making recommendations for the development of entrepreneurial personality and business culture, Vietnamese corporate culture in the process of innovation and international integration and also emphasizing the role of entrepreneurs in building and developing corporate culture and business culture in general. In addition, author Mai Han (2009) also mentioned some key factors for building successful corporate culture in the article "Transforming corporate culture to suit the digital age".
These studies will create a premise for the author to clarify how important the issue of building and developing corporate culture is and thereby emphasize the urgency of the topic and propose solutions to improve the work of building and developing corporate culture of Vietnamese tourism companies.
On corporate culture, building and developing corporate culture of tourism companies
There have been studies on the construction and development of corporate culture of companies in industries and fields such as banking and finance, manufacturing, but there are very few studies published specifically on the construction and development of corporate culture of tourism companies. Regarding the corporate culture of tourism companies, there are a few studies that have explored this topic, for example, Robaki et al. (2020) studied the relationship between corporate culture and business results in the tourism industry, studying the case of Luxury Tourist. This study showed a positive relationship between corporate culture and some indicators of business results of this enterprise, thereby showing the importance of the construction and development of corporate culture of tourism companies and making administrators pay more attention to this work. Previously, author Tepeci (2005) also pointed out the positive impact between corporate culture and employee satisfaction in the tourism sector in Türkiye. Yusof et al. (2012) also pointed out the positive impact of corporate culture on tourist satisfaction. Regarding the construction and development of corporate culture of tourism companies, Noonan (2017) also pointed out the important contents that leaders need to pay attention to and the questions they need to answer to build and develop their corporate culture to support the company's strategy.
3. Research Gap
Researching previous works both domestically and internationally shows that research on corporate culture is not a new content. However, regarding the research on the construction and development of corporate culture of tourism companies in general and Vietnamese tourism companies in particular, there are some gaps that the author sees as follows:
Firstly, the tourism industry is one of the key industries of our country, with important contributions to the economy. The increasing number of tourism companies makes competition in the industry more and more fierce, besides, new issues such as epidemics have a great impact on the tourism industry and tourism companies. Meanwhile, corporate culture has been considered one of the key factors affecting the performance and competitive advantage of enterprises since the early days. However, up to now, the construction and development of corporate culture of tourism companies has not attracted much attention from scholars and researchers.
Second, although research on corporate culture or building and developing corporate culture is not new (there are many studies but they only focus on assessing the current state of corporate culture of a specific enterprise or a number of enterprises in general). These studies have shown the relationship between corporate culture, building and developing corporate culture with criteria of performance such as revenue, profit, market share, product development, employee satisfaction. However, these studies focus on enterprises in the US, Russia, Europe, Hong Kong and enterprises in many different fields, but there has not been any specific research on building and developing corporate culture and those factors in Vietnamese tourism companies.
Third, in previous studies, there has been no in-depth research on solutions and orientations for Vietnamese tourism companies to be able to build, maintain and develop their corporate culture.
From studying previous research works on related topics both domestically and internationally, the controversial issues have motivated the author to find gaps in research on corporate culture as well as building and developing corporate culture of tourism companies. This is also the key basis for the author to choose the topic "Building and developing corporate culture of Vietnamese tourism companies".
4. Research objectives and research tasks
The research objective of the thesis is to analyze the current status of building and developing corporate culture of Vietnamese tourism companies to find out the advantages and limitations, thereby proposing solutions to help Vietnamese tourism companies complete the building and development of their corporate culture.
To achieve this research objective, the research tasks of the thesis are:
- Systematize theoretical basis on building and developing corporate culture
- Analyze the current status of building and developing corporate culture of Vietnamese tourism companies
- Research on factors affecting the construction and development of corporate culture of Vietnamese tourism companies
- Proposing solutions to improve the work of building and developing corporate culture of Vietnamese tourism companies.





