Morphological Characteristics of K Lines (Winter-Spring Crop 2017-2018 in Gia Lam - Hanoi)

151

Table 10: Morphological characteristics of K lines (Winter-Spring crop 2017-2018 in Gia Lam - Hanoi)



STT


Line name


Length (cm)


Number of leaves


TGST

(day)

Long gill

flower (cm)


Number of flowers

/flower


Condition

flower (cm)


Leaf position (level)


KDL level

(grant)

Number of tubers


Main color


Secondary colors


Lip color


Lower lobe color


Flower shape


Wing shape


Flower Arrangement

1

K1

108.4

7

72

38.8

11

10.7

5

1

3

Pink red

Same color

Red gold

Red gold

T. angle

Slippery

other

2

K2

122.8

7

80

63.3

19

13.5

3

1

5

Dark pink

Same color

Same color

Same color

Star

Ripple

Other

3

K3

133.1

7

83

52.8

14

10.5

3

3

3

Dark pink

Same color

Same color

Same color

Star

Ripple

Other

4

K5

134.6

7

81

58.8

12

11

3

3

1

Blush

Same color

Same color

Same color

Star

Ripple

Other

5

K6

151.2

6

82

67.1

13

9.8

5

3

3

Pink orange

Same color

Same color

Same color

Star

Ripple

Other

6

K7

129.7

7

82

61.2

12

12.5

3

5

2

Blush

Same color

Same color

Same color

Star

Ripple

other

7

K8

101.2

8

83

38.2

6

9.4

3

1

2

Red yellow

Same color

Same color

Red gold

Round

Ripple

together

8

K9

131.5

7

82

63.5

17

13.4

5

1

2

Pink orange

Same color

White pink

White pink

Star

Slippery

Other

9

K10

148.7

7

77

76.7

16

11.4

3

3

1

Pink

Same color

White pink

Same color

Star

Ripple

Other

10

K11

137.5

7

82

68.5

17

13.4

3

1

3

Pink orange

Same color

White pink

White pink

Star

Slippery

Other

11

K12

151.2

6

82

67.1

13

9.8

5

3

3

Pink orange

Same color

Same color

Same color

Star

Ripple

Other

12

K13

134.6

7

81

58.8

12

11

3

3

3

Pink orange

Same color

White pink

White pink

Star

Slippery

Other

13

K14

120.5

7

85

48.7

12

11.5

5

1

3

Pink orange

Same color

Same color

Same color

Star

Ripple

Other

14

K16

154.1

8

77

64

18

11.2

5

1

1

Orange red

Same color

Same color

Same color

Star

Ripple

Other

15

K17

132

7

77

57.5

11

12.5

5

3

4

Pink

Same color

Light yellow

Same color

T. angle

Ripple

Other

16

K18

118.4

6

73

38

11

18.2

3

1

2

Blush

Same color

Same color

Same color

Star

Ripple

Other

17

K19

110.5

6

77

48.9

10

12.1

3

3

3

Dark pink

Same color

Same color

Same color

Star

Slippery

Other

18

K20

112.2

7

82

44.2

10

12.4

3

3

6

Pink

Same color

White pink

White pink

T. angle

Ripple

Other

19

K21

105.2

8

83

37.2

6

9.4

3

1

9

Red yellow

Same color

Same color

Red gold

Round

Ripple

together

20

K22

146.7

7

77

76.2

16

11.4

3

5

4

Pink

Same color

White pink

Same color

Star

Ripple

Other

21

K23

131.3

7

82

63.4

17

13.4

3

3

5

Pink orange

Same color

White pink

White pink

Star

Slippery

Other

22

K24

122.6

7

80

63.3

19

13.5

3

1

3

Dark pink

Same color

Same color

Same color

Star

Ripple

Other

Mean

129.00

6.95

80.00

57.10

13.27

11.91

3.73

2.27

3.23








SEm ±

3.34

0.12

0.72

2.58

0.80

0.42

0.21

0.28

0.39








Maybe you are interested!

Morphological Characteristics of K Lines (Winter-Spring Crop 2017-2018 in Gia Lam - Hanoi)

152

Table 11: Morphological characteristics of L lines (Winter-Spring crop 2017-2018 in Gia Lam - Hanoi)



STT


Line name


Length (cm)


Number of leaves


TGST

(day)


Flowering section length (cm)


Number of flowers

/flower


Flower diameter (cm)


Leaf position (level)


KDL level

(grant)


Number of tubers


Main color


Secondary colors


Lip color


Lower lobe color


Flower shape


Wing shape


Flower Arrangement

1

L2

136

7

77

76

15

12

1

1

3

Light pink

Same color

Same color

Same color

Star

Slippery

Other

2

L3

116.5

7

83

41.2

11

8.9

5

3

3

Pink orange

Same color

Same color

Orange

T. angle

Slippery

Other

3

L4

135.6

7

82

70.2

17

10.6

5

1

3

Pink orange

Same color

Orange

Same color

T. angle

Ripple

Other

4

L5

132

7

75

56.7

15

12.3

3

1

1

Pink orange

Same color

Same color

pale yellow

T. angle

Slippery

Other

5

L6

126

7

82

73.2

17

11.4

5

3

1

Orange

Same color

Same color

Same color

I.sense

Ripple

Other

6

L7

132.1

7

84

63.2

14

8.2

3

1

4

Red yellow

Same color

Same color

Same color

T. angle

Slippery

other

7

L8

117.5

7

84

40.5

11

8.7

5

3

1

Pink orange

Same color

Same color

Orange

T. angle

Slippery

Other

8

L9

132.8

7

76

56.7

12

10.6

5

1

3

Pink orange

Same color

Same color

pale yellow

T. angle

Slippery

Other

Mean

128.56

7.00

80.38

59.71

14.00

10.34

4.00

1.75

2.38








SEm ±

2.74

0.00

1.32

4.82

0.87

0.55

0.53

0.37

0.42








153

Table 12: Morphological characteristics of M lines (Winter-Spring crop 2017-2018 in Gia Lam - Hanoi)



STT


Line name


Length (cm)


Number of leaves


TGST

(day)

Long flowering section

(cm)


Number of flowers

/flower


Condition

flower (cm)


Leaf position (level)


KDL level

(grant)


Number of tubers


Main color


Secondary colors


Lip color


Lower lobe color


Flower shape


Wing shape


Flower Arrangement

1

M1

103.6

6

67

43.6

10

12.5

3

3

10

Yellow

Same color

Same color

Same color

T. angle

Ripple

Other

2

M4

153

7

72

69.5

18

11.1

1

3

15

Red yellow

Same color

red gold

red gold

Star

Ripple

Other

3

M5

108

7

77

47.8

12

10.7

3

3

1

Orange red

Same color

Orange

Same color

T. angle

Ripple

Other

4

M6

156

7

84

68

15

11.1

3

3

1

Pink orange

Same color

Same color

Rose gold

T. angle

Ripple

Other

5

M8

123.7

7

84

57.2

16

10.4

3

1

2

Bright red

Yellow Stripe

Same color

Yellow Stripe

Star

Ripple

Other

6

M9

153.8

7

72

69.5

18

11.1

3

1

5

Orange red

Light yellow

red gold

red gold

T. angle

Ripple

Other

7

M10

156

7

84

68

15

11.1

3

1

5

Pink orange

Same color

Same color

Rose gold

T. angle

Ripple

Other

8

M11

103.6

6

67

43.6

10

12.5

3

3

5

Yellow

Same color

Same color

Same color

T. angle

Ripple

Other

9

M12

107.4

7

86

32.7

9

10.4

3

3

3

Bright red

Same color

Yellow Stripe

Yellow Stripe

T. angle

Ripple

Together

10

M13

123.7

7

84

57.2

16

10.4

3

1

7

Bright red

Yellow Stripe

Same color

Yellow Stripe

Star

Ripple

Other

11

M15

156

7

84

68

15

10.1

3

3

3

Pink orange

Same color

Same color

Rose gold

T. angle

Ripple

Other

12

M16

123.2

7

84

57.2

16

10.8

3

1

5

Bright red

Yellow Stripe

Same color

Yellow Stripe

Star

Ripple

Other

13

M17

133.4

6

78

53.2

14

12.2

3

3

4

Carrot

Same color

Same color

Same color

T. angle

Ripple

Other

14

M18

108.6

6

67

44.6

10

11.5

3

3

3

Yellow

Same color

Same color

Same color

T. angle

Ripple

Other

15

M19

156.6

7

84

68.1

15

10.1

3

3

3

Pink orange

Same color

Same color

Rose gold

T. angle

Ripple

Other

16

M20

125.7

7

84

55.2

16

11.4

3

1

3

Bright red

Yellow Stripe

Same color

Yellow Stripe

Star

Ripple

Other

17

M21

108.6

6

67

43.8

10

11.5

3

3

2

Yellow

Same color

Same color

Same color

T. angle

Ripple

Other

Mean

129.46

6.71

77.94

55.72

13.82

11.11

3.00

2.29

4.53








SEm ±

5.18

0.11

1.83

2.81

0.73

0.18

0.00

0.24

0.85








154

Table 13: Morphological characteristics of N lines (Winter-Spring crop 2017-2018 in Gia Lam - Hanoi)



STT


Line name


Length (cm)


Number of leaves


TGST

(day)

Flowering section length (cm)

Number of flowers

/flower

Condition

flower (cm)

Leaf position (level)

KDL level

(grant)

Number of tubers

(root)


Main color


Secondary colors


Lip color

Lower lobe color

Flower shape

Wing shape

Flower Arrangement

1

N1

125.7

7

83

48.2

13

9.7

5

3

2

Red flag

Same color

Same color

Same color

T. angle

Ripple

Other

2

N2

142.3

7

81

67.2

15

11.4

5

3

2

Red flag

Yellow Stripe

Same color

Same color

T. angle

Ripple

Other

3

N3

110.3

7

83

38.5

9

9.7

3

5

3

Red flag

Red cloud

Same color

Same color

Star

Ripple

Other

4

N5

115.2

7

77

41.5

11

10.1

3

3

3

Red flag

White stripes

Same color

Same color

T. angle

Ripple

Other

5

N6

123.4

7

74

52.6

13

12.6

3

3

2

Red flag

White stripes

Same color

Same color

T. angle

Ripple

Other

6

N7

87.2

6

81

38.4

11

11.2

5

1

4

Crimson

Same color

Same color

Same color

Star

Ripple

Other

7

N8

113.2

7

76

43.6

14

10.2

3

3

5

orange red

Yellow Stripe

Same color

Same color

Star

Slippery

Other

8

N9

123.1

7

76

52.4

13

12.2

3

3

3

Red flag

White stripes

Same color

Same color

T. angle

Ripple

Other

9

N10

140.3

7

80

65.2

15

11.7

3

3

6

Red flag

Yellow Stripe

Same color

Same color

T. angle

Ripple

Other

10

N12

129.5

6

77

54.5

12

11.5

3

5

5

Orange red

Same color

Same color

Same color

Star

Ripple

Other

11

N13

142.3

7

81

61.2

15

11.4

3

3

2

Red flag

Yellow Stripe

Same color

Same color

T. angle

Ripple

Other

12

N14

116.2

7

75

47.2

14

11.6

3

3

1

Red flag

Red cloud

Same color

Same color

Star

Ripple

Other

13

N15

117.1

7

77

41.6

14

11.4

3

3

3

Orange red

Yellow Stripe

Same color

Same color

Star

Slippery

Other

14

N16

114.2

7

73

46.6

14

10.2

3

3

1

Orange red

Yellow Stripe

Same color

Same color

Star

Slippery

Other

15

N17

129.5

6

77

54.5

12

11.3

3

3

3

Orange red

Same color

Same color

Same color

Star

Ripple

Other

16

N17

115.7

7

82

47.2

13

9.5

3

3

3

Red flag

Same color

Same color

Same color

T. angle

Ripple

Other

17

N18

132.3

7

85

66.2

15

11.5

3

3

1

Red flag

Yellow Stripe

Same color

Same color

T. angle

Ripple

Other

18

N20

89.2

6

75

38.3

11

10.2

3

1

3

Red

Same color

Same color

Same color

Star

Ripple

Other

19

N21

127.5

6

77

53.5

12

11.2

3

5

5

Orange red

White stripes

Same color

Same color

Star

Ripple

Other

Mean

120.75

6.74

78.42

50.44

12.95

10.98

3.32

3.11

3.00








SEm ±

3.46

0.10

0.79

2.16

0.39

0.20

0.17

0.24

0.33








155

Table 14: Morphological characteristics of O lines (Winter-Spring crop 2017-2018 in Gia Lam - Hanoi)



STT


Line name


Length (cm)


Number of leaves


TGST

(day)

Long flowering section

(cm)


Number of flowers

/flower


Condition

flower (cm)


Leaf position (level)


KDL level

(grant)


Number of tubers


Main color


Secondary colors


Lip color


Lower lobe color


Flower shape


Wing shape


Flower Arrangement

1

O1

135.5

7

83

58.3

13

9.7

3

1

2

Pink orange

Same color

Same color

Same color

Star

Ripple

Other

2

O3

134.7

7

81

63.2

14

9.5

3

3

6

Blush

Same color

Yellow Stripe

Same color

Star

Ripple

Other

3

O4

114.5

6

80

52.7

12

10.8

3

1

3

Light orange

Same color

Same color

Same color

Star

Ripple

Other

4

O5

110.5

7

81

50.2

11

9.5

3

1

3

Light orange

Same color

Same color

Same color

Star

Ripple

Other

5

O6

115.5

7

80

52.3

12

11.2

5

3

3

Orange

Same color

Same color

Orange

Star

Slippery

Other

6

O7

119

7

80

46.8

13

11.1

3

3

3

Red flag

Same color

Same color

Same color

T. angle

slippery

Other

7

O8

113.7

7

82

43.5

14

9.2

3

1

2

Red

Same color

Same color

Red and white

Star

Ripple

Together

8

O9

118.5

7

80

53.2

16

10.7

3

1

4

Red

Same color

Same color

Yellow Stripe

Star

Ripple

Other

9

O10

123.7

7

80

56.2

14

11.1

5

1

5

Orange

Same color

White stripes

White stripes

Star

Ripple

Together

10

O11

146.7

7

83

62.1

17

11.4

5

1

6

Orange red

Same color

Same color

Same color

Star

Ripple

Together

11

O12

142.3

7

82

67.2

16

11.3

5

3

3

Orange

Same color

Same color

Same color

Star

Ripple

Other

12

O13

132.1

7

84

63.2

16

12.3

7

1

8

Orange red

Same color

Same color

Same color

Star

Ripple

Other

13

O14

114.5

6

80

52.7

12

10.8

3

1

7

Light orange

Same color

Same color

Same color

Star

Ripple

Other

14

O15

126.7

7

81

54.2

16

11.7

5

1

3

Red flag

Same color

Same color

Yellow Stripe

Star

Slippery

Other

15

O17

113.5

7

82

42.5

13

9.6

5

3

3

Red

Same color

Same color

Red and white

Star

Ripple

Together

16

O18

116.7

7

84

43.1

14

9.3

3

3

3

Red

Same color

Same color

Red and white

Star

Ripple

Together

Mean

123.63

6.88

81.44

53.84

13.94

10.58

4.00

1.75

4.00








SEm ±

2.83

0.09

0.36

1.90

0.45

0.24

0.32

0.25

0.46








APPENDIX 2. DATA PROCESSING

2.1. BREEDS EVALUATION

BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE DLA FILE XLI1 9/13/20 20:42

-------------------------------------------------- ---------------- :PAGE 1

Agronomic evaluation of 25 varieties

VARIATE V004 DLA

LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER

SQUARES SQUARES LN

================================================================ =========================== 1 R 2 2.25120 1.12560 2.00 0.138 5

2 GIONG$ 24 54303.9 2262.66 ****** 0.000 5

3 T 1 497,953 497,953 885.76 0.000 5

4 T*GIONG$ 24 106.922 4.45510 7.92 0.000 5

* RESIDUAL 98 55.0934 .562177

-------------------------------------------------- -------------------------

* TOTAL (CORRECTED) 149 54966.1 368,900

-------------------------------------------------- ------------------------- BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE SLA FILE XLI1 9/13/20 20:42

-------------------------------------------------- ---------------- :PAGE 2

Agronomic evaluation of 25 varieties

VARIATE V005 SLA

LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER

SQUARES SQUARES LN

================================================================ =========================== 1 R 2 .883600 .441800 5.31 0.007 5

2 GIONG$ 24 74.7171 3.11321 37.45 0.000 5

3 T 1 2.30640 2.30640 27.75 0.000 5

4 T*GIONG$ 24 1.93110 .804625E-01 0.97 0.514 5

* RESIDUAL 98 8.14639 .831265E-01

-------------------------------------------------- -------------------------

* TOTAL (CORRECTED) 149 87.9846 .590501

-------------------------------------------------- ------------------------- BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE DCANH FILE XLI1 9/13/20 20:42

-------------------------------------------------- ---------------- :PAGE 3

Agronomic evaluation of 25 varieties

VARIATE V006 DCANH

LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER

SQUARES SQUARES LN

================================================================ ========================================= 1 R 2 2.64374 1.32187 0.94 0.396 5

2 GIONG$ 24 59395.0 2474.79 ****** 0.000 5

3 T 1 478,112 478,112 340.50 0.000 5

4 T*GIONG$ 24 88.5311 3.68880 2.63 0.000 5

* RESIDUAL 98 137.605 1.40413

-------------------------------------------------- -------------------------

* TOTAL (CORRECTED) 149 60101.8 403.368

-------------------------------------------------- ------------------------- BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE DDOAN FILE XLI1 9/13/20 20:42

-------------------------------------------------- ---------------- :PAGE 4

Agronomic evaluation of 25 varieties

VARIATE V007 DDOAN

LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER

SQUARES SQUARES LN

================================================================ ========================================= 1 R 2 110.250 55.1250 424.45 0.000 5

2 GIONG$ 24 7031.01 292.959 ****** 0.000 5

3 T 1 333,015 333,015 ****** 0.000 5

4 T*GIONG$ 24 40.0200 1.66750 12.84 0.000 5

* RESIDUAL 98 12.7277 .129875

-------------------------------------------------- -------------------------

* TOTAL (CORRECTED) 149 7527.02 50.5169

-------------------------------------------------- ------------------------- BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE DKCANH FILE XLI1 9/13/20 20:42

-------------------------------------------------- ---------------- :PAGE 5

Agronomic evaluation of 25 varieties

VARIATE V008 DKCANH

LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER

SQUARES SQUARES LN

================================================================ =========================== 1 R 2 .211600 .105800 11.54 0.000 5

2 GIONG$ 24 5.31360 .221400 24.15 0.000 5

3 T 1 .540000 .540000 58.90 0.000 5

4 T*GIONG$ 24 .360000 .150000E-01 1.64 0.048 5

* RESIDUAL 98 .898400 .916734E-02

-------------------------------------------------- -------------------------

* TOTAL (CORRECTED) 149 7.32360 .491517E-01

-------------------------------------------------- ------------------------- BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE SOHOA FILE XLI1 9/13/20 20:42

-------------------------------------------------- ---------------- :PAGE 6

Agronomic evaluation of 25 varieties

VARIATE V009 SOHOA


LN

SOURCE OF VARIATION

DF SUMS OF

SQUARES

MEAN F RATIO PROB ER

SQUARES LN

================================================================ =========================================

1 R

2 7.29000

3.64500

12.16 0.000

5

2 SON$

24 840,038

35.0016

116.79 0.000

5

3 T

1 22.1184

22.1184

73.80 0.000

5

4 T*GIONG$

24 8.30160

.345900

1.15 0.303

5

* RESIDUAL

98 29.3699

.299693



-------------------------------------------------- -------------------------

* TOTAL (CORRECTED) 149 907.118 6.08804

-------------------------------------------------- ------------------------- BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE DKHOA FILE XLI1 9/13/20 20:42

-------------------------------------------------- ---------------- :PAGE 7

Agronomic evaluation of 25 varieties

VARIATE V010 DKHOA

LN

SOURCE OF VARIATION

DF SUMS OF

SQUARES

MEAN F RATIO PROB ER

SQUARES LN

================================================================ =========================== 1 R 2 .575999E-01 .288000E-01 0.30 0.749 5

2 SON$

24 105,480

4.39500

45.14 0.000

5

3 T

1 2.61360

2.61360

26.84 0.000

5

4 T*GIONG$

24 .926400

.386000E-01

0.40 0.994

5

* RESIDUAL

98 9.54241

.973715E-01



-------------------------------------------------- -------------------------

* TOTAL (CORRECTED) 149 118,620 .796107

-------------------------------------------------- ------------------------- BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE SCUBI FILE XLI1 9/13/20 20:42

-------------------------------------------------- ---------------- :PAGE 8

Agronomic evaluation of 25 varieties 2

VARIATE V011 SCUBI

LN

SOURCE OF VARIATION

DF SUMS OF

SQUARES

MEAN F RATIO PROB ER

SQUARES LN

================================================================ =========================================

1 R

2 36.2404

18.1202

13.10 0.000

5

2 SON$

24 136805.

5700.23

****** 0.000

5

3 T

1 735,270

735,270

531.63 0.000

5

4 T*GIONG$

24 623,505

25.9794

18.78 0.000

5

* RESIDUAL

98 135,538

1.38304



-------------------------------------------------- -------------------------

* TOTAL (CORRECTED) 149 138336. 928,429

-------------------------------------------------- ------------------------- TABLE OF MEANS FOR FACTORIAL EFFECTS FILE XLI1 9/13/20 20:42

-------------------------------------------------- ---------------- :PAGE 9

MEANS FOR EFFECT GIONG$

-------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------

GOODNESS

DLA

SLA

DCANH

DDOAN

GL1 6

65.7000

7.00000

93.9833

43.3000

GL2 6

105,683

8.30000

135,467

47.7500

GL3 6

77.6500

7.57500

94.3333

28.6000

GL4 6

73.4667

6.72500

83.5667

31.5000

GL5 6

62.6500

7.10000

87.5000

34.5000

GL6 6

61.8500

7.15000

80.1333

30.7000

GL7 6

90.6333

8.50000

110,883

46.2500

GL8 6

78.6500

7.50000

82.1333

35.1000

GL9 6

81.4667

7.30000

88.6167

36.1000

GL10 6

62.4833

6.50000

91.1667

34.8500

GL11 6

52.0000

7.00000

79.2500

41.6500

GL12 6

68.2833

7.17500

98.7500

31.7000

GL13 6

62.6000

6.80000

90.3667

30.2500

GL14 6

107,250

8.85000

131,167

48.5000

GL15 6

54.5000

6.00000

80.7167

32.1000

GL16 6

55.6500

6.20000

80.2833

31.5000

GL17 6

112,250

8.30000

120,400

41.6500

GL18 6

87.5500

7.30000

108,967

40.6500

GL19 6

74.1000

6.20000

100,300

43.6500

GL20 6

98.5000

7.20000

123,583

51.5000

GL21 6

96.4833

7.20000

135,400

47.8000

GL22 6

76.5000

7.47500

114,650

44.7500

GL23 6

51.5500

6.47500

87.4333

35.8000

GL24 6

89.4000

7.52500

124,467

37.0000

GL25 6

115,700

7.75000

141,750

48.3000

SE(N= 6)

0.306098

0.117705

0.483759

0.147125

5%LSD 98DF

3.883964

0.540300

3.331751

1.732858

GOODNESS

DKCANH

SOHOA

DKHOA

SCUBI

GL1 6

0.900000

12.5000

10.7000

155,300

GL2 6

1.40000

15.3000

11.5000

20.0500

GL3 6

0.900000

10.0500

9.10000

20.6000

GL4 6

0.800000

8.50000

8.80000

11.3000

GL5 6

0.700000

7.75000

9.10000

13.5000

GL6 6

0.800000

8.40000

8.70000

20.3000

GL7 6

0.900000

10.1000

10.5000

43.1000

GL8 6

0.800000

8.15000

9.20000

7.50000

GL9 6

0.800000

8.35000

8.70000

21.5500

GL10 6

0.800000

8.75000

9.40000

60.2500


GL11

6

0.800000

7.00000

9.80000

13.7000

GL12

6

0.900000

9.85000

10.4000

53.1500

GL13

6

0.800000

8.50000

9.60000

37.3000

GL14

6

1.40000

13.8000

11.5000

43.7000

GL15

6

0.800000

9.80000

9.80000

7.65000

GL16

6

0.900000

8.65000

9.70000

40.3500

GL17

6

1.20000

12.8000

10.6000

10.5000

GL18

6

0.900000

11.8000

10.5000

7.15000

GL19

6

0.900000

11.5000

10.3000

5.10000

GL20

6

0.900000

13.1000

9.00000

10.5000

GL21

6

1.00000

14.0000

9.00000

60.3000

GL22

6

0.800000

10.6500

9.20000

27.6500

GL23

6

0.800000

8.50000

8.50000

40.4000

GL24

6

1.30000

13.5000

10.5000

35.3000

GL25

6

0.900000

14.0000

9.90000

28.6500

SE(N=

6) 0.390882E-01 0.223492

0.127391

0.480111

5%LSD

98DF 0.041088 0.262158

0.173482

5.713472

-------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------


ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE SUMMARY TABLE FILE XLI1 9/13/20 20:42

-------------------------------------------------- ---------------- :PAGE 10

Agronomic evaluation of 25 varieties

F-PROBABLIITY VALUES FOR EACH EFFECT IN THE MODEL. SECTION - 1

VARIATE GRAND MEAN STANDARD DEVIATION C OF V |R |GIONG$ |T |T*GIONG$| (N= 150) -------------------- SD/MEAN | | | | | NO. BASED ON BASED ON % | | | | | OBS. TOTAL SS RESID SS | | | | |

DLA

150 78,502

19,207

0.74978

3.0 0.1382

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

SLA

150 7.2440

0.76844

0.28832

2.0 0.0066

0.0000

0.0000

0.5141

DCANH

150 102.61

20,084

1.1850

3.9 0.3958

0.0000

0.0000

0.0005

DDOAN

150 39,018

7.1075

0.36038

2.7 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

DKCANH

150 0.92400

0.22170

0.95746

2.5 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0484

SOHOA

150 10,612

2.4674

0.54744

1.5 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.3033

DKHOA

150 9.7600

0.89225

0.31204

1.1 0.7488

0.0000

0.0000

0.9941

SCUBI

150 31,794

30,470

1.1760

11.2 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000


2.2. LINE SELECTION EXPERIMENT

BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE CDC FILE 25DLAI 7/27/21 9:12

-------------------------------------------------- ---------------- :PAGE 1

Selected 25 pairs

VARIATE V003 CDC

LN

SOURCE OF VARIATION

DF SUMS OF

SQUARES

MEAN F RATIO PROB

SQUARES

ER

LN

================================================================ =========================================

1 NL

2 65.1394

32.5697

5.73 0.006 3

2 SON$

25 13809.1

552,364

97.24 0.000 3

* RESIDUAL

50 284,035

5.68070


-------------------------------------------------- -------------------------

* TOTAL (CORRECTED) 77 14158.3 183,874

-------------------------------------------------- ------------------------- BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE DMH FILE 25DLAI 7/27/21 9:12

-------------------------------------------------- ---------------- :PAGE 2

Selected 25 pairs

VARIATE V004 ÐMH

LN

SOURCE OF VARIATION

DF SUMS OF

SQUARES

MEAN F RATIO PROB

SQUARES

ER

LN

================================================================ =========================================

1 NL

2 101,920

50.9600

4.48 0.016 3

2 SON$

25 5955.86

238,234

20.97 0.000 3

* RESIDUAL

50 568,120

11.3624


-------------------------------------------------- -------------------------

* TOTAL (CORRECTED) 77 6625.90 86.0507

-------------------------------------------------- ------------------------- BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE DKC FILE 25DLAI 7/27/21 9:12

-------------------------------------------------- ---------------- :PAGE 3

Selected 25 pairs

VARIATE V005 DKC

LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER

SQUARES SQUARES LN

================================================================ =========================== 1 NL 2 .179488E-04 .897442E-05 0.02 0.984 3

2 GIONG$ 25 .990219E-01 .396087E-02 7.51 0.000 3

* RESIDUAL 50 .263821E-01 .527641E-03

-------------------------------------------------- -------------------------

* TOTAL (CORRECTED) 77 .125422 .162886E-02

-------------------------------------------------- ------------------------- BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE SH FILE 25DLAI 7/27/21 9:12

-------------------------------------------------- ---------------- :PAGE 4

Selected 25 pairs

VARIATE V006 SH

LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER

Comment


Agree Privacy Policy *