42 species of grass, 28 species of sedge, 12 species of Asteraceae, 12 species of legume, 7 species of coffee. U Minh Thuong has a diverse and rich flora including many rare and endemic species. In 2000, Tran Triet recorded 226 species of vascular plants. Among them, the pointed duckweed is rare in Southeast Asia, but very common in UMT National Park.
In 2003, the Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources inherited this information and supplemented it, increasing the number of plants to 299 species and 102 families.
The survey in August 2009 added a total of 387 species belonging to 108 families, including 13 endemic species and 5 rare species, to the total number recorded in the entire region.
This is a plain area, a coastal strip of land, so the high abundance belongs to families suitable for the plain ecosystem, acid sulphate soil, peat, and flood-resistant such as: daisy family, grass family, sedge family. Many types of mangrove forests such as: Rhizophora family, Verbena family, and Avicennia genus.
In the area, there is only one species recorded in SDVN, 2007, VU level is endangered: Com Canh Uot, Com family, tree has narrow distribution in Dong Thap Muoi area, suffers from flooding in the rainy season.
Fauna
Initial survey results have shown that the fauna in U Minh Thuong National Park is considered to have the highest biodiversity in the Mekong Delta region, as follows:
Mammal Group : Through research results, it has been recorded that in U Minh Thuong National Park there are 32 species belonging to 13 families, 7 orders, 12 species listed in the Vietnam Red Book and IUCN. Of which, there are 10 species of carnivores belonging to 4 families, 4 species of which are listed in the Vietnam Red Book 2007, 7 species are listed in Decree 32/2006/ND/CP of the government. Some very rare species in the country are also found here such as: Hairy-nosed otter, small-clawed otter, fishing cat, large-spotted walking civet...
Table 2.3: List of carnivorous animals in U Minh Thuong National Park
STT
Name | Carnivora | Rarity | ||
SD 2007 | Decree 32 | |||
1 | Small clawed otter | Weasel Family | VU | IB |
2 | Hairy-nosed otter | Weasel Family | EN | IB |
3 | Civet | Civet Family | ||
4 | Large spotted mongoose | Civet Family | VU | IIB |
5 | mongoose | Civet Family | ||
6 | Civet | Civet Family | ||
7 | Crab hooker | mongoose family | ||
8 | mongoose | mongoose family | ||
9 | Cat | Cat family | IB | |
10 | Fishing Cat | Cat family | EN | IB |
Maybe you are interested!
-
Potential and current status of ecotourism development in U Minh Thuong National Park - Kien Giang province - 1 -
Orientation and Solutions for Developing Tourist Attractions in U Minh Thuong National Park -
Potential and current status of ecotourism development in U Minh Thuong National Park - Kien Giang province - 2 -
Potential and current status of ecotourism development in U Minh Thuong National Park - Kien Giang province - 14 -
Identify Rating Levels and Rating Scales
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism,quan lan,quang ninh,ecology,ecotourism,minh chau,van don,geography,geographical basis,tourism development,science
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
of the islanders. Therefore, this indicator will be divided into two sub-indicators:
a1. Natural tourism attractiveness a2. Cultural tourism attractiveness
b. Tourist capacity
The two island communes in Quan Lan have different capacities to receive tourists. Minh Chau Commune is home to many standard hotels and resorts, attracting high-income domestic and international tourists. Meanwhile, Quan Lan Commune has many motels mainly built and operated by local people, so the scale and quality are not high, and will be suitable for ordinary tourists such as students.
c. Time of exploitation of Quan Lan Island Commune:
Quan Lan tourism is seasonal due to weather and climate conditions and festivals only take place on certain days of the year, specifically in spring. In Quan Lan commune, the period from April to June and from September to November is considered the best time to visit Quan Lan because the cultural tourism activities are mainly associated with festivals taking place during this time.
Minh Chau island commune:
Tourism exploitation time is all year round, because this is a place with a number of tourist attractions with diverse ecosystems such as Bai Tu Long National Park Research Center, Tram forest, Turtle Laying Beach, so besides coming to the beach for tourism and vacation in the summer, Minh Chau will attract research groups to come for tourism combined with research at other times of the year.
d. Sustainability
The sustainability of ecotourism sites in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes depends on the sensitivity of the ecosystems to climate changes.
landscape. In general, these tourist destinations have a fairly high level of sustainability, because they are natural ecosystems, planned and protected. However, if a large number of tourists gather at certain times, it can exceed the carrying capacity and affect the sustainability of the environment (polluted beaches, damaged trees, animals moving away from their habitats, etc.), then the sustainability of the above ecosystems (natural ecosystems, human ecosystems) will also be affected and become less sustainable.
e. Location and accessibility
Both island communes have ports to take tourists to visit from Van Don wharf:
- Quan Lan – Van Don traffic route:
Phuc Thinh – Viet Anh high-speed boat and Quang Minh high-speed boat, depart at 8am and 2pm from Van Don to Quan Lan, and at 7am and 1pm from Quan Lan to Van Don. There are also wooden boats departing at 7am and 1pm.
- Van Don - Minh Chau traffic route:
Chung Huong high-speed train, Minh Chau train, morning 7:30 and afternoon 13:30 from Van Don to Minh Chau, morning 6:30 and afternoon 13:00 from Minh Chau to Van Don.
f. Infrastructure
Despite receiving investment attention, the issue of infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism on Quan Lan Island is still an issue that needs to be resolved because it has a direct impact on the implementation of ecotourism activities. The minimum conditions for serving tourists such as accommodation, electricity, water, communication, especially medical services, and security work need to be given top priority. Ecotourism spots in Minh Chau commune are assessed to have better infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism because there are quite complete and synchronous conditions for serving tourists, meeting many needs of domestic and foreign tourists.
3.2.1.4. Determine assessment levels and assessment scales
Corresponding to the levels of each criterion, the index is the score of those levels in the order of 4, 3, 2, 1 decreasing according to the standard of each level: very attractive (4), attractive (3), average (2), less attractive (1).
3.2.1.5. Determining the coefficients of the criteria
For the assessment of DLST in the two communes of Quan Lan and Minh Chau islands, the students added evaluation coefficients to show the importance of the criteria and indicators as follows:
Coefficient 3 with criteria: Attractiveness, Exploitation time. These are the 2 most important criteria for attracting tourists to tourism in general and eco-tourism in particular, so they have the highest coefficient.
Coefficient 2 with criteria: Capacity, Infrastructure, Location and accessibility . Because the assessment area is an island commune of Van Don district, the above criteria are selected by the author with appropriate coefficients at the average level.
Coefficient 1 with criteria: Sustainability. Quan Lan has natural and human-made ecotourism sites, with high biodiversity and little impact from local human factors. Most of the ecotourism sites are still wild, so they are highly sustainable.
3.2.1.6. Results of DLST assessment on Quan Lan island
a. Assessment of the potential for natural tourism development
For Minh Chau commune:
+ Natural tourism attractiveness is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined as average (2 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of Capacity criterion is 2 x 2 = 4.
+ Exploitation time is long (4 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Exploitation time criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is assessed as good (3 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 3 x 2 = 6 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Minh Chau commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 4 + 12 + 4 + 4 + 6 = 42 points
Similar assessment for Quan Lan commune, we have the following table:
Table 3.3: Assessment of the potential for natural ecotourism development in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of self-tourismof course
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
CommuneMinh Chau
12
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
42/52
Quan CommuneLan
6
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
33/52
b. Assessment of the potential for humanistic tourism development
For Quan Lan commune:
+ The attractiveness of human tourism is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined to be large (3 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Capacity criterion is 3 x 2 = 6.
+ Mining time is average (3 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Mining time criterion is 3 x 3 = 9.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points.
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is rated as average (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Quan Lan commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 6 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 4 = 36 points.
Similar assessment with Minh Chau commune we have the following table:
Table 3.4: Assessment of the potential for developing humanistic eco-tourism in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of human tourismliterature
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Quan CommuneLan
12
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
39/52
Minh CommuneChau
6
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
36/52
Basically, both Minh Chau and Quan Lan localities have quite favorable conditions for developing ecotourism. However, Quan Lan commune has more advantages to develop ecotourism in a humanistic direction, because this is an area with many famous historical relics such as Quan Lan Communal House, Quan Lan Pagoda, Temple worshiping the hero Tran Khanh Du, ... along with local festivals held annually such as the wind praying ceremony (March 15), Quan Lan festival (June 10-19); due to its location near the port and long exploitation time, the beaches in Quan Lan commune (especially Quan Lan beach) are no longer hygienic and clean to ensure the needs of tourists coming to relax and swim; this is also an area with many beautiful landscapes such as Got Beo wind pass, Ong Phong head, Voi Voi cave, but the ability to access these places is still very limited (dirt hill road, lots of gravel and rocks), especially during rainy and windy times; In addition, other natural resources such as mangrove forests and sea worms have not been really exploited for tourism purposes and ecotourism development. On the contrary, Minh Chau commune has more advantages in developing ecotourism in the direction of natural tourism, this is an area with diverse ecosystems such as at Rua De Beach, Bai Tu Long National Park Conservation Center...; Minh Chau beach is highly appreciated for its natural beauty and cleanliness, ranked in the top ten most beautiful beaches in Vietnam; Minh Chau commune is also home to Tram forest with a large area and a purity of up to 90%, suitable for building bridges through the forest (a very effective type of natural ecotourism currently applied by many countries) for tourists to sightsee, as well as for the purpose of studying and researching.
Figure 3.1: Thenmala Forest Bridge (India) Source: https://www.thenmalaecotourism.com/(August 21, 2019)
3.2.2. Using SWOT matrix to evaluate Quan Lan island tourism
General assessment of current tourism activities of Quan Lan island is shown through the following SWOT matrix:
Table 3.5: SWOT matrix evaluating tourism activities on Quan Lan island
Internal agent
Strengths- There is a lot of potential for tourism development, especially natural ecotourism and humanistic ecotourism.- The unskilled labor force is relatively abundant.- resource environmentunpolluted, still
Weaknesses- Poorly developed infrastructure, especially traffic routes to tourist destinations on the island.- The team of professional staff is still weak.- Tourism products in general
quite wild, originalintact
general and DLST in particularalone is monotonous.
External agents
Opportunity- Tourism is a key industry in the socio-economic development strategy of the province and Van Don economic zone.- Quan Lan was selected as a pilot area for eco-tourism development within the framework of the green growth project between Quang Ninh province and the Japanese organization JICA.- The flow of tourists and especially ecotourism in the world tends toincreasing
Challenge- Weather and climate change abnormally.- Competition in tourism products is increasingly fierce, especially with other localities in the province such as Ha Long, Mong Cai...- Awareness of tourists, especially domestic tourists, about ecotourism and nature conservation is not high.
Through summary analysis using SWOT matrix we see that:
To exploit strengths and take advantage of opportunities, it is necessary to:
- Diversify products and service types (build more tourism routes aimed at specific needs of tourists: experiential tourism immersed in nature, spiritual cultural tourism...)
- Effective exploitation of resources and differentiated products (natural resources and human resources)
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: #0D0D0D; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -3pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Symbol, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:Wingdings; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:Cambria, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: #212121; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex

(According to VNU Science Journal, Natural Sciences and Technology 25
(2009) pp. 40-44)
Rarity: SD 2007, Vietnam Red Book 2007 VU: Vulnerable
EN: Critical
NDD32: List of rare and precious forest animals and plants issued under Decree 32/2006/ND-CP dated March 30, 2006 of the Government.
IB: strictly prohibit exploitation and use for commercial purposes IIB: restrict exploitation and use for commercial purposes
Thus, in U Minh Thuong National Park, the number of carnivores accounts for 25.6% of the total number of carnivorous species in Vietnam (10/39), the highest among national parks and nature reserves in the Mekong Delta region, but much less than other regions in the country (compared to 22 species in Ta Dung mountain area in the Central Highlands, 27 species in Phong Nha-Ke Bang National Park in the Central region, 22 species in Huu Lien nature reserve). However, the number of individuals of a species of animal here is quite high compared to
with other regions, especially some rare species such as: small-clawed otter, hairy-nosed otter, fishing cat, large spotted mongoose.
The richness and diversity of the mammal fauna at U Minh Thuong National Park is demonstrated in the table below:
Table 2.4: Wild animal resources in some national parks nationwide
TT
National Park Name | Species | Surname | Set | % of species nationwide | |
1 | UMT National Park | 32 | 13 | 7 | 14 |
2 | Ba Vi National Park | 43 | 21 | 8 | 19 |
3 | Cat Ba National Park | 20 | 10 | 5 | 9 |
4 | Ben En National Park | 53 | 21 | 10 | 23 |
5 | Bach Ma National Park | 55 | 23 | 9 | 24 |
(According to the report of the conference on sustainable ecotourism in Vietnam)
Bird group
According to the assessment report of the bird fauna of U Minh Thuong National Park by Tran Van Thang (May 2011). A total of 152 bird species belonging to 39 families were recorded during the survey. Combined with the previous bird fauna monitoring results of Nguyen Phuc Bao Hoa and Tran Van Thang (1999-2003), Buckton et al (1999), Saford (1997), there were 20 more bird species. The total bird species composition in U Minh Thuong National Park up to this point is up to 172 species belonging to 42 families. Of the 152 bird species recorded during the above survey, 2 bird species (Kingfisher Ceryle rudis and Cormorant Phalacrocorax carbo) were recorded as additional species for the bird fauna of U Minh Thuong National Park. Two species of birds, the Wild Goshawk and the Crested Goshawk recorded by Safford in 1996-1997, were also recorded in this survey but were not recorded in previous bird surveys and monitoring.
Of the 172 bird species recorded in U Minh Thuong National Park, 19 species are considered to be of important conservation value. Of these 19 species, 9 species are listed as globally threatened or endangered by IUCN, of which 3 species are considered “vulnerable” and 7 species are considered “vulnerable”. Six species are listed in the Vietnam Red Book (2007) with a threat level of R. Seven species have a population size exceeding 1% of their population in the region.
Southeast Asia and the World. Southeast Asia and the world populations based on estimates from Wetlands international (2000).
Table 2.5: Important bird species for conservation in UMT National Park
STT
Vietnamese name | IUCN Red Book 2000 | Vietnam Red Book 2007 | |
1 | Black-tailed Straight-billed Sandpiper | Near-threatened | |
2 | Grey-headed Fish Kite | Near-threatened | |
3 | Black Eagle | Vulnerable | |
4 | Snake neck | Near-threatened | |
5 | Fire Heron | ||
6 | Big Egret | ||
7 | Little stork | ||
8 | Stork | ||
9 | Stork | ||
10 | Black Quail | ||
11 | Black-headed Ibis | Near-threatened | |
12 | Grey-legged pelican | Vulnerable | R |
13 | Black Cup | ||
14 | Cup base | R | |
15 | Indian stork | Near-threatened | R |
16 | Stork | R | |
17 | White-necked crane | R | |
18 | Java push | Vulnerable | R |
19 | Golden Dragon | Near-threatened |
(According to the Bird Fauna Assessment Report of U Minh Thuong National Park)
Reptiles and amphibians
Table 2.6: Comparison of reptiles between U Minh Thuong National Park and other national parks and nature reserves.
Location
Area (ha) | Classification level | |||
Number of sets | Number of family | Number of species | ||
Sand fairy | 74,219 | 3 | 17 | 79 |
UMT National Park | 21,107 | 2 | 11 | 31 |
A Luoi (Hue City) | 116,642 | 2 | 13 | 49 |
Spring - Massage | 18,806 | 2 | 15 | 56 |
Source: Biology Journal 24(2A),2000
Through the table, we can see that U Minh Thuong National Park has a relatively small area compared to other national parks and nature reserves. However, in general, the number of reptiles here is relatively rich in species, with 31 species belonging to 11 families and 2 orders. In addition to 31 species of reptiles, U Minh Thuong National Park has 7 other amphibian species, a total of 38 species. Of which, 20 species are threatened with extinction in the country and in the world. The species that need special priority include: reticulated python, king cobra, toothed turtle, black-backed box turtle, three-hour turtle and horseshoe crab.
Aquatic group
U Minh Thuong National Park is a flooded forest with rich flora and fauna, a place of exchange and transition between two ecosystems of saltwater and freshwater, containing all the ecological factors of salt, brackish, and fresh water, making the ecosystem here complex.
In March 2002, a forest fire occurred, the ecosystem changed a lot, after a long time of pumping salt water to fight the fire and keep the forest warm, the entire freshwater system of U Minh Thuong National Park was converted to a brackish-salt ecosystem (salinity 5-15%). The aquatic ecosystem changed a lot, following an undefined trend due to the mixing of fresh-brackish-salt ecosystems, leaning more towards salinity. However, aquatic resources in general and the zooplankton ecosystem in particular are always changing under the impact of
Climate change, annual rainfall and sunshine regimes and human impacts, the resilience of the ecosystem, including aquatic organisms, is a reality.
Through two surveys in August and November 2004 in U Minh Thuong National Park, 75 species of zooplankton were identified, belonging to 6 groups: Protozoa, Rotatoria, Cladocea, Copepoda, Ostracoda and larvae. The group with the highest number of species is Rotatoria: 29 species, accounting for 38.7%, followed by Cladocera with 21 species, accounting for 28.0%. The remaining groups such as Protozoa, Copepoda, Ostracoda and Larvae have fewer species, ranging from only 2-10 species, reaching a rate of 2.7% - 13.3%.
Table 2.7: Species composition of zooplankton in U Minh Thuong National Park
TT
Species group | Year 2002 | 2004 | |||
Number of species | Proportion (%) | Number of species | Proportion (%) | ||
1 | Protozoa | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2.7 |
2 | Rotatoria (Rotatorium) | 5 | 14.3 | 29 | 38.7 |
3 | Cladocera (crustaceans) | 5 | 14.3 | 21 | 28.0 |
4 | Copepoda (crustaceans) | 18 | 51.4 | 10 | 13.3 |
5 | Ostracoda (shelled crustaceans) | 0 | 0.0 | 4 | 5.3 |
6 | Larvae | 7 | 20.0 | 9 | 12.0 |
Total | 35 | 100 | 75 | 100 | |
(According to the Assessment Report of the Floating Fauna of UMT National Park)
Insect group
Based on the nomenclature according to Bingham (1897) - Hymenoptera Order, Distant (1906) - Rhynchota, Pautian (1945) - Coleoptera Order, Akinobu (1967) - Coleoptera Order, Dang Thi Dap (1981) - Coleoptera Order, Liyongxi Zhou Zhihong et al. (1990), Shusiro Ito et al . (1993) and Le Xuan Hue (2000) - Hymenoptera. The identification results are as follows:
There are a total of 172 species belonging to 53 Families and 12 Orders. The Coleoptera has the largest number of families and species (57 species belonging to 14 families). The next largest Orders are the Heteroptera (39 species, 10 families), the Hymenoptera (24 species, 8 families), the Diptera (21 species, 4 families), the Orthoptera (11
The orders Mantoidea (6 species, 2 families), Homoptera (6 species, 5 families), and Odonata (5 species, 2 families) have only 1 species. The orders Blattoidea, Neuroptera, and Dermapter have only 1 species. The order Ephemeroptera has 2 specimens collected but not identified.
Only six aquatic species have been identified, two in the families Belostomatidae and Dytiscidae, and one each in the families Hydrophilidae and Gerridae.
Table 2.8: Insect Orders in UMT National Park with corresponding number of species and families
TT
Department (scientific name and Vietnamese name) | Number of specimens identification | The number they set name | Number of species specified name | |
1 | Orthoptera - Order Straight Wings | 103 | 4 | 11 |
2 | Blattoidea - Order Cockroaches | 12 | 1 | 1 |
3 | Mantoidea - Order Praying Mantis | 15 | 2 | 6 |
4 | Neuroptera - Neuroptera | 12 | 1 | 1 |
5 | Homoptera - Order of Wings | 34 | 5 | 6 |
6 | Heteroptera - Order Hemiptera | 105 | 10 | 39 |
7 | Coleoptera - Beetles | 265 | 14 | 57 |
8 | Hymenoptera - Order of Hymenoptera | 98 | 8 | 24 |
9 | Diptera - Order Two Wings | 72 | 4 | 21 |
10 | Odonata - Order Dragonflies | 35 | 2 | 5 |
11 | Dermaptera - Order of Skin Wings | 3 | 1 | 1 |
12 | Ephemeroptera - Order Mayflies | 2 | 1 | 0 |
Total | 756 | 53 | 172 | |
(According to the Project Report on Conservation and Development of Kien Giang Biosphere Reserve)
Two insect species in U Minh Thuong National Park are listed as threatened in the Vietnam Red Book (2000):
Mantis religiosa (Praying Mantis) – Level V (Vulnerable), found in grasslands near the Management Board headquarters and Checkpoint 4, low abundance.
Lethocerus indicus ( Cà cương) – R (Rare). Recorded only by observation by local people. The characteristic feature of its scent gland is its favorite use in Vietnamese dishes. The Cà cương is threatened by
Overhunting; pesticides and herbicides; or strong light intensity also harm this insect species.
Fish group
U Minh Thuong Nature Reserve was established in 1992 in Kien Giang province. This is a wetland system surrounded by a system of dykes and canals. Aquatic resources here play a very important role compared to other natural resources, which is a source of protein and income for the community in the area.
Research results show that there are 66 fish species, of which 9 species have economic value, exploited in U Minh Thuong nature reserve: Snakehead fish, Day fish, Sac Ran fish, Ro Dong fish, Tre Vang fish, Tre Trang fish, That Lat fish, Sac Buom fish and Sac Diep fish.
2.2.2.2. Topography, geomorphology
- The topographic structure here is quite complex, reflecting the complex geological history of the region. The U Minh alum forests as well as the alum forests in the Mekong Delta are closely related to the history of the formation of this vast delta. From the neotectonic geological activities at the end of the Cenozoic era, two uplifted blocks of South Central and Southeast Vietnam along with Eastern Cambodia were created, the middle block collapsed with the lower Mekong River (including the main Mekong - Bassac rivers and tributary systems), deposited with sedimentary layers nearly a million years ago. Following these neotectonic movements was the period when the sea advanced into the continental shelf, then the sea retreated, leaving newly exposed land on depressions such as Dong Thap Muoi, Tu Giac Long Xuyen and deeper in the U Minh area. The huge volume of alluvium and sediment of the Mekong River basin is concentrated and forms the Mekong Delta, especially due to the resonance effect of the ocean currents in the southern East Sea, most of this alluvium is transported down and towards the southwest, creating the land called Ca Mau peninsula (formed more than ten thousand years ago).
The original forest layer in U Minh has collapsed and then been buried, gradually a new layer of vegetation appears on the sediment layer, which can also be called the original forest layer on the next formed soil layer. The forests were buried before





