Legal Status of Bank Lending Activities in Relation to Environmental Issues

green growth strategy for the period 2014-2020. To implement this strategy, the State Bank of Vietnam (SBV) is assigned the task of perfecting institutions and enhancing the financial and credit capacity of commercial banks to serve green growth. Accordingly, the SBV issued Directive No. 03/CT-NHNN on promoting green credit growth and managing environmental and social risks in credit activities (March 2015) and the Action Plan of the banking sector to implement the National Strategy on Green Growth to 2020 (August 2015). These policies encourage credit institutions to proactively develop policies on environmental and social risk management as well as implement solutions to promote green credit growth. However, by 2016, only 3 banks had or were developing internal policies on environmental and social risk management.

The fact that banks have not paid attention to environmental and social standards in lending activities is partly due to the lack of comprehensive regulations in Vietnamese law directly related to the need for banks to consider environmental and social risks for credit loans. Most legal documents only focus on the responsibility of units that directly cause pollution. This has led to a subjective mentality of credit officers when conducting appraisals without paying attention to assessing environmental risks. Strict control right from the credit appraisal stage can limit environmental and social risks through the decision to agree or refuse to lend capital to projects with bad signs. Therefore, a legal regulation plays a very important role in determining the joint responsibilities of banks in the face of environmental incidents. From there, banks will need to be more careful in their lending decisions so that credit can reach investors in a "quality" manner, while ensuring legally binding conditions on green criteria and environmental friendliness.

Chapter 2: Legal status of bank lending activities in relation to environmental issues

2.1. Legal status of lending activities for investment projects with high environmental risks

For projects with high risks to the environment, Vietnam's environmental laws have quite strict and detailed regulations on the process of appraisal, approval and implementation of strategic environmental assessment (SEA), environmental impact assessment (EIA) and environmental protection plan. However, in these regulations, the role of banks in the whole process of developing and supervising the implementation of these assessments has not been mentioned.

In the regulations on bank capital provision processes, including regulations on lending conditions, non-borrowed capital needs, regulations on appraisal, approval of lending decisions, monitoring of the lending process, use of loans and cases of loan termination, environmental factors have not yet been incorporated into the main regulations.

2.1.1. Regulations on the role of banks in the process of appraisal, approval and implementation of environmental protection commitments

Decree 18/2015/ND-CP of the Government regulating environmental protection planning, strategic environmental assessment, environmental impact assessment and environmental protection plans has quite detailed regulations on the process of appraisal, approval and implementation of environmental protection commitments as stipulated in the Law on Environmental Protection 2014. In particular, Article 20 of this Decree stipulates the financial regime in this field. Accordingly, the source of costs for conducting environmental impact assessment is taken from the project's investment source, the source of costs for implementing environmental protection plans is also arranged from the project's investment source, production and business plan. So, where is the main source of investment for the project mobilized? The answer is from credit institutions, mainly from the lending business of banks themselves.

Therefore, the fact that banks do not pay attention to environmental issues will affect the implementation of environmental commitments of project owners. If banks only provide capital and do not participate in the process of using capital of project owners for the purpose of implementing approved environmental protection commitments, the implementation of these commitments will only be effective depending on the awareness of project owners. More detailed legal regulations on the role and responsibility of banks in supervising the process of using capital of project owners for the purpose of implementing environmental protection commitments are very necessary. Because, current legal regulations only use very general terms such as " Getting opinions from political-social organizations, social organizations, socio-professional organizations, and relevant experts" [5, Article 10] without specifying any specific organizations or individuals.

The regulations on public consultation are only at the level of encouragement or formality, the responsibility for appraisal and approval still belongs to the competent state agencies. The responsibility for implementing the approved commitments in the environmental protection commitments only belongs to the project owners. Meanwhile, the responsibility of the related parties, including the bank as the capital provider, has not been regulated. This is a loophole that makes banks not interested in assessing environmental and social risks when providing investment capital for projects.

2.1.2. Regulations on bank lending procedures for projects with high environmental risks

Directive 03/2015/CT-NHNN on implementing green credit has opened up new hopes in building a greener banking credit system, serving the green growth trend and protecting the living environment. However, although it has been issued for nearly 2 years, the effectiveness of this directive is still very modest. One reason for the low effectiveness of this directive is that this directive is only at the level of encouragement, not mandatory implementation, still depending on the awareness of the banks themselves.

In addition, the lending regulations for domestic credit institutions and foreign bank branches issued together with Circular 39/2016/TT-NHNN were issued after Directive 03/2015/CT-NHNN but did not specify the provisions in this Directive. This lending regulation is mandatory, banks must strictly comply with the provisions in this regulation. Therefore, if the provisions in Directive 03 can be integrated into this lending regulation, it will bring higher practical efficiency, forcing banks to consider more carefully in their lending decisions, if they do not want to violate the law and affect their reputation.

2.1.2.1. Regulations on lending conditions


The lending regulations issued with Circular 39/2016/TT-NHNN stipulate the following loan conditions:

“Credit institutions consider and decide to lend when customers meet the following conditions:

1. The Customer is a legal entity with civil legal capacity as prescribed by law. The Customer is an individual from 18 years of age or older with full civil act capacity as prescribed by law or from 15 years of age to under 18 years of age who has not lost or had limited civil act capacity as prescribed by law.

2. Need to borrow capital for legal purposes.


3. Have a feasible capital usage plan.


4. Have the financial ability to repay the debt”. [10, Article 7]


Regulations on lending conditions are the source for banks to build their lending procedures later. Based on the regulations on lending conditions, banks will specify these conditions in the appraisal, approval, lending and monitoring processes. However, looking at the above regulations, it can be seen that banking law still stops at specialized regulations, which only aim to ensure the debt recovery ability of banks. Factors

Other factors, including environmental and social factors, have not yet been specified in this lending condition. It all depends on the banks' awareness when building their own internal regulations.

Currently, banks have a black credit list, which includes customers with a bad credit history, who do not repay their debts on time, are late many times, or bankrupt businesses that are unable to pay their debts. In China, after the "green credit" policy was issued, banks have compiled a list of production and business establishments and businesses with a history of causing environmental pollution into the black credit list, restricting lending. This action demonstrates China's strong determination in controlling environmental pollution, a pressing issue today in this populous country with the second largest economy in the world. Therefore, banks in Vietnam should also consider creating a black list of businesses and business establishments with a history of causing environmental pollution in their lending activities, not just stopping at customers who do not pay their debts.

2.1.2.2 Regulations on appraisal, approval and lending decision process


The new lending regulations issued with Circular 39/2016/TT-NHNN replace the old lending regulations, giving banks more initiative in their lending process.

According to Circular 39/2016/TT-NHNN, credit institutions have the right and obligation to issue internal lending regulations, including the loan appraisal process for customers, in accordance with the provisions of law and ensuring clear division of responsibilities between the appraisal and loan decision stages.

Loan application appraisal is a process that includes many different tasks such as checking the financial capacity of the borrower, checking the ability to recover capital from the projects that the borrower borrows capital to implement, checking the assets used to secure the loan capital, etc. The results of consultations from banks (in Hanoi) show that the Environmental - Social factors (risks) have been somewhat considered and integrated in the

process of appraising loan proposals. For BIDV, this bank does not approve credit for projects that have not been included in the planning, while Vietcombank only approves credit for projects that have been approved for environmental impact assessment, and at the same time, project owners are also required to provide information related to technology and environment in the loan application. This is a common situation when banks only stop at checking whether the loan application project has been approved (reported) for EIA or not. On the one hand, credit institutions believe that the function of assessing and appraising environmental risks belongs to state agencies responsible for environmental management; on the other hand, banks believe that (their) credit officers do not have the expertise to be able to appraise the impacts of projects on the environment and society, and in fact, the assessment depends a lot on the experience of credit officers. The legal responsibility of the appraisers has also only stopped at crimes such as negligence causing serious consequences, mainly due to losses for the bank. The legal responsibility of the bank itself or the appraisers in projects causing environmental pollution has not been considered.

Table 1 - Appraisal contents for projects proposed for loans by Vietcombank


STT

Appraisal content

1.

Customer capacity and experience

2.

Technology process and production equipment

3.

Input materials and supply markets

4.

Electricity, water and fuel supplies

5.

Labor supply

6.

Contractors implementing the project

7.

Market for products and services

8.

Environmental problems and mitigation solutions

9.

Total investment and project capital structure

10.

Financial performance and debt repayment capacity of the project

Maybe you are interested!

Legal Status of Bank Lending Activities in Relation to Environmental Issues

Directive 03/2015/CT-NHNN has regulations for banks to consider environmental and social risks of investment projects during the approval and funding process. This Directive stipulates that when appraising projects, credit institutions should base on environmental and social regulations of relevant ministries and branches to consider and assess environmental and social risks that projects may bring such as " abuse of resources and energy, causing pollution of the natural environment, imbalance of ecosystems, climate change, damage to cultural heritage, threats to safety, security and health of people and communities, unequal labor and forced resettlement " [9, section 4]. However, these regulations have not been specified in any other legal documents, and are still only at the level of encouragement.

On the other hand, the fact that the law allows banks to develop their own criteria in the capital appraisal process, while there are no necessary regulations to control this appraisal process, makes all the regulations in Directive 03 become formal and impractical. For example, Vietcombank has regulations on environmental criteria in the appraisal content, but there is no legal corridor to guide or allow banks to participate in the appraisal process, approve and implement environmental protection commitments of project owners that the bank provides capital. Banks still have to depend on approved environmental impact assessment reports to determine the environmental and social risks that the project may cause, while in the whole process of developing and implementing these reports, banks are not allowed to participate in a formal manner based on legal regulations.

In addition, a reality that makes the process of appraising bank loan applications for projects with environmental risks difficult is that large projects in industries with high risks to the environment such as hydropower, mining, and oil and gas are currently carried out by state-owned corporations such as the General Corporation.

Vietnam Minerals Corporation Vinacomin, Vietnam Oil and Gas Corporation, Vietnam Electricity Group EVN deploy and implement. Meanwhile, large banks accounting for more than 50% of the market share in Vietnam have charter capital mainly represented by the state. Therefore, when conducting appraisals for projects invested by these companies, these banks are in a more passive position than lending to normal projects. Publicity and transparency in the operations of enterprises with capital represented by the state is a prominent issue but has not yet been resolved in Vietnam. Banks themselves are also affected by this issue.

For example, in the case of the Vietnam Development Bank (VDB), this bank lent the Vietnam Electricity Group (EVN) capital to invest in the Vinh Tan 2 thermal power project, with a loan amount of up to 7,500 billion VND. This project started construction in August 2010 and went into operation in March 2015[11]. After only 1 year of operation, the Vinh Tan 2 thermal power plant has caused many environmental problems related to slag dumps, ash and dust in the air. Every day, the two generators discharge nearly 4,000 tons of coal slag but are not transported properly to the slag dump of several dozen hectares. Smoke and coal slag cover the houses and trees of local people. Due to environmental problems, the project had to be suspended many times. The cost for each restart of the system is up to billions of VND.[6]

2.1.2.3. Regulations on the process of checking and monitoring the borrowing process and loan use

According to the provisions of the new lending regulations issued under Circular 39/2016/TT-NHNN, the internal regulations of banks must include the content of " Procedures for checking and supervising the process of borrowing, using loans and repaying debts of customers; decentralization, authorization and responsibility of each individual and department in checking and supervising the process of borrowing, using loans and repaying debts of customers " [10, Article 22]

Comment


Agree Privacy Policy *