APPENDIX 1.3. INTRODUCTION TO GROUPS OF INDICATORS TO ASSESS THE DEVELOPMENT OF TCTC'S ACTIVITIES
There are many groups of indicators reflecting the development of TCTCNT activities such as CAMELS, PEARLS, and groups of indicators on access and sustainability.
In addition, a number of other indicators are also used such as the size and quality of outstanding loans, asset and loan management, operating efficiency and operating effectiveness.
The following is an introduction to the PEARLS and CAMELS indicator groups.
A. PEARLS
PEARLS is a system of 44 financial indicators widely used worldwide by the World Commission on Credit Unions (WOCCU) to monitor credit activities. It was originated and applied in the late 1980s, at the Guatemalan credit union.
Components of the PEARL system
1. Protection indicators
P = PROTECTION INDICATORS
Standard levels | ||
P1 | Provision for credit risk/overdue loans> 12 months | 100% |
P2 | Credit Risk Provision/Net 1-12 Month Overdue Loans | 35% |
P3 | Total loans overdue > 12 months written off | 100% |
P4 | Total annual debt write-offs/Average outstanding debt | Minimum |
P5 | Cumulative Loan Recoveries/Total Debt Written Off cumulative | 100% |
P6 | Liquidity ratio (net asset value/Total capital and cash) send) | >=110% |
Maybe you are interested!
-
Identify Rating Levels and Rating Scales
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism,quan lan,quang ninh,ecology,ecotourism,minh chau,van don,geography,geographical basis,tourism development,science
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
of the islanders. Therefore, this indicator will be divided into two sub-indicators:
a1. Natural tourism attractiveness a2. Cultural tourism attractiveness
b. Tourist capacity
The two island communes in Quan Lan have different capacities to receive tourists. Minh Chau Commune is home to many standard hotels and resorts, attracting high-income domestic and international tourists. Meanwhile, Quan Lan Commune has many motels mainly built and operated by local people, so the scale and quality are not high, and will be suitable for ordinary tourists such as students.
c. Time of exploitation of Quan Lan Island Commune:
Quan Lan tourism is seasonal due to weather and climate conditions and festivals only take place on certain days of the year, specifically in spring. In Quan Lan commune, the period from April to June and from September to November is considered the best time to visit Quan Lan because the cultural tourism activities are mainly associated with festivals taking place during this time.
Minh Chau island commune:
Tourism exploitation time is all year round, because this is a place with a number of tourist attractions with diverse ecosystems such as Bai Tu Long National Park Research Center, Tram forest, Turtle Laying Beach, so besides coming to the beach for tourism and vacation in the summer, Minh Chau will attract research groups to come for tourism combined with research at other times of the year.
d. Sustainability
The sustainability of ecotourism sites in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes depends on the sensitivity of the ecosystems to climate changes.
landscape. In general, these tourist destinations have a fairly high level of sustainability, because they are natural ecosystems, planned and protected. However, if a large number of tourists gather at certain times, it can exceed the carrying capacity and affect the sustainability of the environment (polluted beaches, damaged trees, animals moving away from their habitats, etc.), then the sustainability of the above ecosystems (natural ecosystems, human ecosystems) will also be affected and become less sustainable.
e. Location and accessibility
Both island communes have ports to take tourists to visit from Van Don wharf:
- Quan Lan – Van Don traffic route:
Phuc Thinh – Viet Anh high-speed boat and Quang Minh high-speed boat, depart at 8am and 2pm from Van Don to Quan Lan, and at 7am and 1pm from Quan Lan to Van Don. There are also wooden boats departing at 7am and 1pm.
- Van Don - Minh Chau traffic route:
Chung Huong high-speed train, Minh Chau train, morning 7:30 and afternoon 13:30 from Van Don to Minh Chau, morning 6:30 and afternoon 13:00 from Minh Chau to Van Don.
f. Infrastructure
Despite receiving investment attention, the issue of infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism on Quan Lan Island is still an issue that needs to be resolved because it has a direct impact on the implementation of ecotourism activities. The minimum conditions for serving tourists such as accommodation, electricity, water, communication, especially medical services, and security work need to be given top priority. Ecotourism spots in Minh Chau commune are assessed to have better infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism because there are quite complete and synchronous conditions for serving tourists, meeting many needs of domestic and foreign tourists.
3.2.1.4. Determine assessment levels and assessment scales
Corresponding to the levels of each criterion, the index is the score of those levels in the order of 4, 3, 2, 1 decreasing according to the standard of each level: very attractive (4), attractive (3), average (2), less attractive (1).
3.2.1.5. Determining the coefficients of the criteria
For the assessment of DLST in the two communes of Quan Lan and Minh Chau islands, the students added evaluation coefficients to show the importance of the criteria and indicators as follows:
Coefficient 3 with criteria: Attractiveness, Exploitation time. These are the 2 most important criteria for attracting tourists to tourism in general and eco-tourism in particular, so they have the highest coefficient.
Coefficient 2 with criteria: Capacity, Infrastructure, Location and accessibility . Because the assessment area is an island commune of Van Don district, the above criteria are selected by the author with appropriate coefficients at the average level.
Coefficient 1 with criteria: Sustainability. Quan Lan has natural and human-made ecotourism sites, with high biodiversity and little impact from local human factors. Most of the ecotourism sites are still wild, so they are highly sustainable.
3.2.1.6. Results of DLST assessment on Quan Lan island
a. Assessment of the potential for natural tourism development
For Minh Chau commune:
+ Natural tourism attractiveness is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined as average (2 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of Capacity criterion is 2 x 2 = 4.
+ Exploitation time is long (4 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Exploitation time criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is assessed as good (3 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 3 x 2 = 6 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Minh Chau commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 4 + 12 + 4 + 4 + 6 = 42 points
Similar assessment for Quan Lan commune, we have the following table:
Table 3.3: Assessment of the potential for natural ecotourism development in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of self-tourismof course
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
CommuneMinh Chau
12
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
42/52
Quan CommuneLan
6
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
33/52
b. Assessment of the potential for humanistic tourism development
For Quan Lan commune:
+ The attractiveness of human tourism is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined to be large (3 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Capacity criterion is 3 x 2 = 6.
+ Mining time is average (3 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Mining time criterion is 3 x 3 = 9.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points.
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is rated as average (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Quan Lan commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 6 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 4 = 36 points.
Similar assessment with Minh Chau commune we have the following table:
Table 3.4: Assessment of the potential for developing humanistic eco-tourism in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of human tourismliterature
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Quan CommuneLan
12
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
39/52
Minh CommuneChau
6
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
36/52
Basically, both Minh Chau and Quan Lan localities have quite favorable conditions for developing ecotourism. However, Quan Lan commune has more advantages to develop ecotourism in a humanistic direction, because this is an area with many famous historical relics such as Quan Lan Communal House, Quan Lan Pagoda, Temple worshiping the hero Tran Khanh Du, ... along with local festivals held annually such as the wind praying ceremony (March 15), Quan Lan festival (June 10-19); due to its location near the port and long exploitation time, the beaches in Quan Lan commune (especially Quan Lan beach) are no longer hygienic and clean to ensure the needs of tourists coming to relax and swim; this is also an area with many beautiful landscapes such as Got Beo wind pass, Ong Phong head, Voi Voi cave, but the ability to access these places is still very limited (dirt hill road, lots of gravel and rocks), especially during rainy and windy times; In addition, other natural resources such as mangrove forests and sea worms have not been really exploited for tourism purposes and ecotourism development. On the contrary, Minh Chau commune has more advantages in developing ecotourism in the direction of natural tourism, this is an area with diverse ecosystems such as at Rua De Beach, Bai Tu Long National Park Conservation Center...; Minh Chau beach is highly appreciated for its natural beauty and cleanliness, ranked in the top ten most beautiful beaches in Vietnam; Minh Chau commune is also home to Tram forest with a large area and a purity of up to 90%, suitable for building bridges through the forest (a very effective type of natural ecotourism currently applied by many countries) for tourists to sightsee, as well as for the purpose of studying and researching.
Figure 3.1: Thenmala Forest Bridge (India) Source: https://www.thenmalaecotourism.com/(August 21, 2019)
3.2.2. Using SWOT matrix to evaluate Quan Lan island tourism
General assessment of current tourism activities of Quan Lan island is shown through the following SWOT matrix:
Table 3.5: SWOT matrix evaluating tourism activities on Quan Lan island
Internal agent
Strengths- There is a lot of potential for tourism development, especially natural ecotourism and humanistic ecotourism.- The unskilled labor force is relatively abundant.- resource environmentunpolluted, still
Weaknesses- Poorly developed infrastructure, especially traffic routes to tourist destinations on the island.- The team of professional staff is still weak.- Tourism products in general
quite wild, originalintact
general and DLST in particularalone is monotonous.
External agents
Opportunity- Tourism is a key industry in the socio-economic development strategy of the province and Van Don economic zone.- Quan Lan was selected as a pilot area for eco-tourism development within the framework of the green growth project between Quang Ninh province and the Japanese organization JICA.- The flow of tourists and especially ecotourism in the world tends toincreasing
Challenge- Weather and climate change abnormally.- Competition in tourism products is increasingly fierce, especially with other localities in the province such as Ha Long, Mong Cai...- Awareness of tourists, especially domestic tourists, about ecotourism and nature conservation is not high.
Through summary analysis using SWOT matrix we see that:
To exploit strengths and take advantage of opportunities, it is necessary to:
- Diversify products and service types (build more tourism routes aimed at specific needs of tourists: experiential tourism immersed in nature, spiritual cultural tourism...)
- Effective exploitation of resources and differentiated products (natural resources and human resources)
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: #0D0D0D; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -3pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Symbol, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:Wingdings; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:Cambria, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: #212121; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
Internal audit organization in economic groups of Vietnam - 28 -
Evaluation Indicators of Some Levels in Provincial Tourism Territorial Organization from the Perspective of Sustainable Development -
Organization: Check attendance, divide into groups, distribute worksheets. -
General Assessment of the Organization and Operation of Employment Introduction Organizations According to Vietnamese Labor Law

2. Effective Financial Structure
E= EFFICIENT FINANCIAL STRUCTURE
Standard level | ||
E1 | Net Loans/Total Assets | 70%-80% |
E2 | Highly Liquid Investments/Total Assets | Up to 20% |
E3 | Financial Investment/Total Assets | Up to 10% |
E4 | Non-financial Investments/Total Assets | 0% |
E5 | Savings Deposits/Total Assets | 70%-80% |
E6 | Third Party Debt/Total Assets | Up to 5% |
E7 | Shareholders' Equity / Total Assets | 10-20% |
E8 | Equity / Total Assets | Minimum 10% |
E9 | Net Institutional Capital / Total Assets | Like E8 |
3. Asset quality
A = Asset Quality
Standard level | ||
A1 | Total overdue loans/ Total loan portfolio value | <=5% |
A2 | Non-performing assets | <= 5% |
A3 | Non-cost capital (Net capital of the organization and convertible capital + Non-interest bearing liabilities)/Non-producing assets word | >200% |
4. Rate of return on investment and cost
R = Rate of return
Standard level | ||
R1 | Net lending income/average net loan portfolio balance | Full interest rate |
R2 | Total income from short-term investments / Average balance of short-term investments | Market interest rate |
R3 | Total income from financial investments/Number average balance of financial investments | Market interest rate |
R4 | Total income from non-financial investments/ Average balance of non-financial investments | >R1 |
R5 | Total savings interest expense/Average balance savings deposit | Market interest rate >inflation rate |
R6 | Total Third Party Loan Cost/Average Balance loan | Market interest rate |
R7 | Total Dividends/Average Equity | Market interest rate >=R5 |
R8 | Gross profit/Average total assets | Fluctuation, Dependent belong to R9,R11,R12 |
R9 | Total operating expenses/Average total asset balance army | 5% |
R10 | Total credit loss provision expense/ Average total asset balance | Depends on the loan late payment |
R11 | Unusual income or expense/ Total balance average product | Lowest level |
R12 | Net Income / Average Total Assets | E9 Dependent |
5. Liquidity
L = Liquidity
Standard level | ||
L1 | Short-term Investments + Easily Convertible Assets - Short-term Payables/ Savings Deposits | Lowest is 15% |
L2 | Liquidity Reserves / Savings Deposits | 10% |
L3 | Non-performing liquid assets/Total value asset value | <1% |
6. Signs of growth
S=Growth Sign
Standard level | ||
S1 | Customer loan portfolio growth | Depends on E1 |
S2 | Growth of liquid investments High | Depends on E2 |
S3 | Growth of financial investments | Depends on E3 |
S4 | Growth in non-financial investments | Depends on E4 |
S5 | Growth in savings deposits | Depends on E5 |
S6 | Increase in third party debt | Depends on E6 |
S7 | Increase equity capital | Depends on E7 |
S8 | Institutional Capital Increase | Depends on E8 |
S9 | Increase in net capital of the organization | Depends on E9 |
S10 | Increase the number of customer members | >12% |
S11 | Total asset value growth | >Inflation rate |
B. CAMEL (or extended CAMEL - CAMEL HIS)
The CAMEL system analyzes five traditional aspects considered to be the most important in the operation of a financial intermediary. The five areas reflect the financial conditions and overall performance of a financial institution, described as follows:
1. C (capital) - Self-balancing capacity : This is the equity of the credit institution and the ability of the credit institution to meet the increasingly expanding loans as well as the potential asset development orientations that the credit institution needs to achieve. The CAMEL analysis system considers the ability of the credit institution to mobilize additional equity in case of losses and the ability and policy to establish reserves in case of operational risks.
Indicators used to analyze capital
- Capital structure, focusing on the relative importance of tier 1 and tier 2 capital: Tier 2 capital is maximum 100% of tier 1 capital
- The quality of shareholders has great influence
- Comply with regulations on minimum capital required
- Comply with regulations on appropriate liquidity/capital ratio
- Quality and financial capacity of shareholders
- Shareholders' participation in the board of directors and voting rights
- Expected changes in capital structure
- Capital reserve index = Actual capital loss reserve/Capital loss reserve adjusted according to CAMEL
2. A (assets) - Asset quality . The overall quality of loans and other assets, including infrastructure loans. This requires consideration of the adequacy of loan classification systems, information collection processes and write-off policies.
Focus on cash and credit
• Cash:
+ Forecast cash inflows and outflows due to disbursement and payment of loans and deposits
deposit withdrawal
+ Measures to ensure money storage and transportation
3. M (management) – Management : Human resource management policies, general management policies of the organization, information systems, internal control and audit regimes, strategic plans and budgets are all considered separately to reflect the overall quality of management activities.
Analyze personnel and work style
- Board of Directors
- Management
- The relationship between the two sides
4. E (earning) – Profit : This is an important factor in the analysis of revenue and costs, including the efficiency of operations and interest rate policies as well as overall operating results measured by indicators.
Analyze the ability to generate sufficient income to cover expenses and sustainably grow capital
• Usage criteria
- Indicators of financial sustainability
- Performance indicators
- Indicators of loan portfolio quality.
• Indicators of financial sustainability
Return on assets = Net income/Average total assets
cost of capital ratio = (loan interest + deposit interest)/ average total assets
Gross financial profit = (financial income - financial expenses)/ average total assets
operating cost index = operating expenses/average total assets
Operating Self-Reliance Index OSS= Total Financial Income/Total Financial Expenses
Financial Self-Sufficiency Index FSS = Total Financial Income/(Total Financial Expenses + Capital Expenses + Operating Expenses + Risk Provisions)
• Performance indicators
Cost per loan unit = operating cost/Amount disbursed during the period
Cost per loan = operating expenses/number of new loans in the period
Number of customers borrowing per credit officer.
• Indicators of loan portfolio quality.
Credit risk provision ratio
Loan Portfolio at Risk
Loss rate.
• Warning signs
Profits decrease, or losses arise
Unusual increase in profits through transactions such as asset liquidation, securities trading, currency trading...
5. L (liquidity) – liquidity : This is a factor used when analyzing the organization's ability to determine the need for project financing in general as well as the need for loan capital in particular. The organization's debt and equity structure, the ability to pay short-term assets are also very important factors in assessing the organization's overall ability to manage liquidity.
Current asset utilization = (1-interest income in the form of cash and quasi-cash)/[(average monthly cash + quasi-cash – liquidity reserves) * Interest rate applicable to 6-month term deposit certificates] + (liquidity reserves * Average savings interest rate)
• Liquidity:
Debt level and debt payment obligations
Deposit and withdrawal fluctuations
Accounts Payable
Provisions
Contingent liabilities (off-balance sheet accounts)
• Early warning signs:
Increasing reliance on bank debt, especially at higher interest rates
Customers deposit and withdraw a lot
Liquidity ratio decreased
Increase in late or uncollectible payments
HIS EXPANDED ITEMS
a. Human resources
• Recruitment and benefits policy
• Clear division of responsibilities and work
• Work results are evaluated and rewarded
• Warning
- Staff have no motivation to work
- There are many complaints from employees.
b. Internal Control
- Necessary procedures in lending and debt collection, especially the two-signature system
- Accuracy in recording revenue and expenses
- Necessary safety measures in currency management and storage
- Completeness of control and inspection procedures
- Frequency and schedule of site inspections
• Warning signs
- Poor quality of control staff
- Unclear policies, easily confusing
- Senior leadership intervention
- Field inspections are sparse and overlooked
c. Systems
Systems (accounting and MIS)
• Accounting system
- Record transactions promptly and accurately
- Frequency and severity of recording errors
• MIS
- Degree of computerization and manualism
- Information collection and management process
- Check the accuracy, relevance and convenience of reports from MIS
The three basic differences between the PEARLS and CAMELS systems are:
PEARLS mainly uses quantitative indicators while CAMEL uses both quantitative and qualitative indicators, such as Management. PEARLS provides an objective assessment of financial performance by reviewing the results of quantitative indicators.
PEARLS evaluates the financial structure of the balance sheet. Financial structure has a direct impact on the efficiency and profitability of a financial institution because the more an institution maximizes its earning assets, the more income it is able to generate.
PEARLS measures growth rates. Monitoring growth in different areas not only allows organizations to assess customer satisfaction, but also helps managers maintain an efficient financial structure since growth directly affects financial structure.
APPENDIX 2.1. SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONTEXT INFLUENCING ACTIVITIES
ACTION OF VIETNAMESE INDUSTRIES
Vietnam is one of the fastest growing economies in the world, and this trend is expected to continue in 2007 and beyond. Vietnam's GDP grew at an average rate of 7.5% during 2001-2005 and 8.2% in 2006 [Vietnam Economic Times 1/2007]. The Government's commitment to economic liberalization and international integration, remarkable developments, and incremental reforms to modernize the economy helped Vietnam become an official member of the WTO in 2006. However, Vietnam remains a less developed country, with 76% of the population and 85% of the poor living in rural areas [WB, 2006a, p. 17].
Since the implementation of the renovation in 1986, Vietnam has achieved many impressive results in agricultural and rural development and poverty reduction. In 1986, the Vietnamese Government decided to implement a national policy of poverty reduction through promoting the production activities of the poor. With the achievements, Vietnam is considered one of the countries that has most successfully implemented the goal of poverty reduction with the poverty rate reduced by nearly half, from 58% in 1993 to 29% in 2002 [Dan Zook, 2005, p. 3] and 24% in 2005 according to United Nations standards. In addition, the average income per capita has grown by an average of 7.3% per year over the past ten years.
Vietnam's development experience has been disseminated by the World Bank to the world through its website www.worldbank.org since February 14, 2007 in seven different languages. "There is probably no country in the world that has developed as fast and as strongly in the past 15 years," said Klaus Rohland, former World Bank Country Director for Vietnam, in an interview posted online. "Vietnam has developed from a country that had to import food to become the second largest rice exporter in the world." In the World Bank's strategy for Vietnam, Vietnam's success in development, poverty reduction and economic growth is described as "spectacular."
The main factors in this impressive development are the rapid modernization of agriculture and the sustainable development of rural areas as well as the resolution of social problems in rural areas, especially poverty reduction. Investments and restructuring within the framework of the main agricultural sector have increased the employment rate of the rural population from 77.66% in 2003 to 79.1% in 2006, reducing unemployment to 1.1% [State Bank of Vietnam, 2005, p.], [IMF, 2006, PRSP February]. Agricultural diversification has been receiving





