Factors affecting budget estimates at State Reserve Department units in the Southeast region

Level of agreement

1. Leadership style (PCLD)

Friendly, approachable manager

Managers always explain their decisions.

with subordinates

The manager always treats his subordinates fairly.

below

The manager always cares about the interests of the

inferior

159.

Tran Van Tam

State Reserve Department of Tay Ninh

Ninh

160.

Nguyen Thi Bao Quyen

State Reserve Department of Tay Ninh

Ninh

161.

Tran Anh Tuan

State Reserve Department of Tay Ninh

Ninh

Maybe you are interested!

Perfecting the Mechanism for Allocating State Budget Expenditure Estimates for Higher Education
Factors Affecting the Training Activities to Improve State Administrative Management Capacity for Secondary School Principals of the Department of Education -
State management of transport infrastructure construction from the State budget of Nghe An province - 13
State Budget Management in Ea Sup District, Dak Lak Province - 1
Factors Affecting the Quality of Auditing Financial Statements of Banks Conducted by the State Audit Office

APPENDIX 4: SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE

Hello everyone!

I am Nguyen Thi Hoai Thu - a graduate student at Thu Dau Mot University. I am currently doing my master's thesis on the topic : "Factors affecting budget planning at units of the State Reserve Department in the Southeast region" . All of your answers are meaningful to the success of the topic. In this survey, there is no right or wrong point of view, all are useful information. Your answers are for research purposes only and are completely confidential.

Looking forward to receiving your support.

I. SURVEY QUESTIONS

Please indicate your opinion by selecting the number that you think best fits the following statements regarding the impact of factors on budget planning at the units of the State Reserve Department in the Southeast region, according to the convention:

1: strongly disagree-2: disagree-3: neutral-4: agree-5: strongly agree

Comments

PCLD5

Managers always talk to their subordinates first. when making decisions	1	2	3	4	5
2. Application of information technology in budgeting (UNGDUNG)
UNGDUNG1	Information technology equipment suitable for demand for use	1	2	3	4	5
UNGDUNG2	The network system is set up to suit the needs. demand for use	1	2	3	4	5
UNGDUNG3	Accounting software meets usage needs	1	2	3	4	5
UNGDUNG4	Accounting software has the ability to control and manage	1	2	3	4	5
UNGDUNG5	Safe and secure electronic storage devices	1	2	3	4	5
3. Budgeting process (QUYTRINH)
QUYTRINH1	Assessment of the implementation of the annual budget fox	1	2	3	4	5
QUYTRINH2	Based on functions, tasks and volume in the year to make the estimate.	1	2	3	4	5
QUYTRINH3	Based on the assigned planning targets and the actual situation at the unit to determine the budget target	1	2	3	4	5
QUYTRINH4	Prepare budget documents including forms reflect data	1	2	3	4	5
QUYTRINH5	Prepare budget documents including explanation table explain the data	1	2	3	4	5
QUYTRINH6	Prepare budget documents including forms attached as prescribed.	1	2	3	4	5
4. Level of employee participation in budgeting (MDTG)
MDTG1	Level of employee participation in work build budget	1	2	3	4	5

MDTG2

When the budget target is adjusted, the worker The action received clear explanations from superiors.	1	2	3	4	5
MDTG3	Frequency of budget discussions with management above proposed/initiated by the employee.	1	2	3	4	5
MDTG4	The extent of workers' influence on work build budget	1	2	3	4	5
5. Scale (QUYMO)
QUYMO1	Complexity of goods, quantity of goods in stock storage	1	2	3	4	5
QUYMO2	Multiple locations and warehouses to stock.	1	2	3	4	5
QUYMO3	Level of hierarchy within the unit	1	2	3	4	5
QUYMO4	Complexity in the unit's operations	1	2	3	4	5
6. Budget estimate (DUTOAN)
DUTOAN1	The unit's budget was well executed.	1	2	3	4	5
DUTOAN2	Budget reports are very beneficial in cost control	1	2	3	4	5
DUTOAN3	The unit's budget helps plan and well coordinated organization	1	2	3	4	5
DUTOAN4	Estimate of the performance evaluation unit set goals	1	2	3	4	5

II. SURVEY RESPONDENT INFORMATION

1. Full name: ................................................................................................................................

2. Email: .............................................. Phone number: ................................................

3. Unit is: ................................ ..........................................................................................

Please check  in the boxes below corresponding to your choice.

Target

Select
Sex
Male	
Female	
Time
Under 3 years	
From 3 years to 10 years	
Over 10 years	
Position
Director	
Deputy Director	
Chief Accountant and Department Heads	
Accountants and workers	

Thank you very much for taking your valuable time to contribute to my research.

Wish you good health and success in your work.

APPENDIX 5: MODEL RUNNING RESULTS

Cronbach's Alpha

N of Items

0.801

Scale: PCLD Reliability Statistics

Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if Item Deleted	Scale Variance if Item Deleted	Corrected Item-Total Correlation	Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted
PCLD1	15.53	5.013	0.522	0.796
PCLD2	15.37	5,835	0.641	0.752
PCLD3	15.33	5,660	0.667	0.743
PCLD4	15.52	5.414	0.602	0.757
PCLD5	15.44	5,536	0.560	0.770

Scale: UNGDUNG

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha

N of Items

0.696

Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if Item Deleted	Scale Variance if Item Deleted	Corrected Item-Total Correlation	Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted
UNGDUNG1	18,261	1,819	0.612	0.570
UNGDUNG2	17,658	2,476	0.518	0.651
UNGDUNG3	17,932	2,077	0.520	0.619
UNGDUNG4	18,106	2.008	0.495	0.627
UNGDUNG5	18,255	2.203	0.496	0.623

Scale: QUYTRINH

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha

N of Items

0.663

Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if Item Deleted	Scale Variance if Item Deleted	Corrected Item-Total Correlation	Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted
QUYTRINH1	19,379	6,437	0.525	0.576
QUYTRINH2	19,491	6,526	0.543	0.573
QUYTRINH3	19,547	5,599	0.652	0.514
QUYTRINH4	19,571	6,459	0.612	0.555
QUYTRINH5	19,565	6,760	0.245	0.689
QUYTRINH6	19,342	8,689	-0.048	0.756

Scale: QUYTRINH - LAN 2

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha

N of Items

0.846

Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if Item Deleted	Scale Variance if Item Deleted	Corrected Item-Total Correlation	Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted
QUYTRINH1	11.53	4,051	0.613	0.835
QUYTRINH2	11.64	4,044	0.672	0.810
QUYTRINH3	11.70	3.401	0.733	0.786
QUYTRINH4	11.72	4,028	0.738	0.787

Cronbach's

Alpha

N of Items

0.703

Scale: MDTG Reliability Statistics

Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if Item Deleted	Scale Variance if Item Deleted	Corrected Item-Total Correlation	Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted
MDTG1	12,559	3,598	0.464	0.664
MDTG2	12,807	2,944	0.531	0.613
MDTG3	12,795	3.014	0.493	0.637
MDTG4	12,950	2,710	0.498	0.641

Cronbach's Alpha

N of Items

0.865

Scale: KHUMO Reliability Statistics

Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if Item Deleted	Scale Variance if Item Deleted	Corrected Item-Total Correlation	Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted
QUYMO1	11.97	4.118	0.663	0.848
QUYMO2	11.96	4,036	0.712	0.828
QUYMO3	11.91	4.010	0.732	0.820
QUYMO4	12.09	4,030	0.750	0.813