interested in implementing innovation in teaching and education methods. The activity "Studying and living in foreign languages, information technology, using teaching technology equipment" has an average score of 3.76, classified as "fair" and ranked 5th lowest among the 5 contents. Specifically, see data table 2.8:
Table 2.8. Evaluation of the implementation of learning and professional activities at high schools according to the summons of the Department of Education and Training
TT
Learning and professional activities at high school | Level of implementation | ||||
Average | DLC | XH | Level | ||
Learning content and professional activities at school | |||||
1 | Study and practice politics, qualities and ethics teacher virtue | 4.33 | 0.63 | 3 | Good |
2 | Study and live in professional and technical fields according to Professional Standards Requirements | 4.21 | 0.52 | 4 | Good |
3 | Study and practice about school year tasks and development local education development | 4.42 | 0.60 | 2 | Good |
4 | Study and activities on innovation in teaching and education | 4.59 | 0.53 | 1 | Good |
5 | Study and practice foreign languages, information technology, and use teaching technology equipment | 3.76 | 0.52 | 5 | Rather |
Forms of study and professional activities at school | |||||
1 | Seminars and talks within the school | 4.02 | 0.53 | 3 | Rather |
2 | Listen to reports (from experts, from staff) assigned school…) | 4.07 | 0.52 | 2 | Rather |
3 | Meetings and activities in groups | 4.14 | 0.50 | 1 | Rather |
SHARED | 4.17 | 0.54 | Rather | ||
Maybe you are interested!
-
Evaluation of Management Board on Organization and Implementation of Management Work to Foster Teaching Capacity for High School Teachers (Appendix 3) -
Identify Rating Levels and Rating Scales
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism,quan lan,quang ninh,ecology,ecotourism,minh chau,van don,geography,geographical basis,tourism development,science
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
of the islanders. Therefore, this indicator will be divided into two sub-indicators:
a1. Natural tourism attractiveness a2. Cultural tourism attractiveness
b. Tourist capacity
The two island communes in Quan Lan have different capacities to receive tourists. Minh Chau Commune is home to many standard hotels and resorts, attracting high-income domestic and international tourists. Meanwhile, Quan Lan Commune has many motels mainly built and operated by local people, so the scale and quality are not high, and will be suitable for ordinary tourists such as students.
c. Time of exploitation of Quan Lan Island Commune:
Quan Lan tourism is seasonal due to weather and climate conditions and festivals only take place on certain days of the year, specifically in spring. In Quan Lan commune, the period from April to June and from September to November is considered the best time to visit Quan Lan because the cultural tourism activities are mainly associated with festivals taking place during this time.
Minh Chau island commune:
Tourism exploitation time is all year round, because this is a place with a number of tourist attractions with diverse ecosystems such as Bai Tu Long National Park Research Center, Tram forest, Turtle Laying Beach, so besides coming to the beach for tourism and vacation in the summer, Minh Chau will attract research groups to come for tourism combined with research at other times of the year.
d. Sustainability
The sustainability of ecotourism sites in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes depends on the sensitivity of the ecosystems to climate changes.
landscape. In general, these tourist destinations have a fairly high level of sustainability, because they are natural ecosystems, planned and protected. However, if a large number of tourists gather at certain times, it can exceed the carrying capacity and affect the sustainability of the environment (polluted beaches, damaged trees, animals moving away from their habitats, etc.), then the sustainability of the above ecosystems (natural ecosystems, human ecosystems) will also be affected and become less sustainable.
e. Location and accessibility
Both island communes have ports to take tourists to visit from Van Don wharf:
- Quan Lan – Van Don traffic route:
Phuc Thinh – Viet Anh high-speed boat and Quang Minh high-speed boat, depart at 8am and 2pm from Van Don to Quan Lan, and at 7am and 1pm from Quan Lan to Van Don. There are also wooden boats departing at 7am and 1pm.
- Van Don - Minh Chau traffic route:
Chung Huong high-speed train, Minh Chau train, morning 7:30 and afternoon 13:30 from Van Don to Minh Chau, morning 6:30 and afternoon 13:00 from Minh Chau to Van Don.
f. Infrastructure
Despite receiving investment attention, the issue of infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism on Quan Lan Island is still an issue that needs to be resolved because it has a direct impact on the implementation of ecotourism activities. The minimum conditions for serving tourists such as accommodation, electricity, water, communication, especially medical services, and security work need to be given top priority. Ecotourism spots in Minh Chau commune are assessed to have better infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism because there are quite complete and synchronous conditions for serving tourists, meeting many needs of domestic and foreign tourists.
3.2.1.4. Determine assessment levels and assessment scales
Corresponding to the levels of each criterion, the index is the score of those levels in the order of 4, 3, 2, 1 decreasing according to the standard of each level: very attractive (4), attractive (3), average (2), less attractive (1).
3.2.1.5. Determining the coefficients of the criteria
For the assessment of DLST in the two communes of Quan Lan and Minh Chau islands, the students added evaluation coefficients to show the importance of the criteria and indicators as follows:
Coefficient 3 with criteria: Attractiveness, Exploitation time. These are the 2 most important criteria for attracting tourists to tourism in general and eco-tourism in particular, so they have the highest coefficient.
Coefficient 2 with criteria: Capacity, Infrastructure, Location and accessibility . Because the assessment area is an island commune of Van Don district, the above criteria are selected by the author with appropriate coefficients at the average level.
Coefficient 1 with criteria: Sustainability. Quan Lan has natural and human-made ecotourism sites, with high biodiversity and little impact from local human factors. Most of the ecotourism sites are still wild, so they are highly sustainable.
3.2.1.6. Results of DLST assessment on Quan Lan island
a. Assessment of the potential for natural tourism development
For Minh Chau commune:
+ Natural tourism attractiveness is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined as average (2 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of Capacity criterion is 2 x 2 = 4.
+ Exploitation time is long (4 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Exploitation time criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is assessed as good (3 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 3 x 2 = 6 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Minh Chau commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 4 + 12 + 4 + 4 + 6 = 42 points
Similar assessment for Quan Lan commune, we have the following table:
Table 3.3: Assessment of the potential for natural ecotourism development in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of self-tourismof course
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
CommuneMinh Chau
12
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
42/52
Quan CommuneLan
6
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
33/52
b. Assessment of the potential for humanistic tourism development
For Quan Lan commune:
+ The attractiveness of human tourism is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined to be large (3 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Capacity criterion is 3 x 2 = 6.
+ Mining time is average (3 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Mining time criterion is 3 x 3 = 9.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points.
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is rated as average (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Quan Lan commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 6 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 4 = 36 points.
Similar assessment with Minh Chau commune we have the following table:
Table 3.4: Assessment of the potential for developing humanistic eco-tourism in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of human tourismliterature
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Quan CommuneLan
12
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
39/52
Minh CommuneChau
6
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
36/52
Basically, both Minh Chau and Quan Lan localities have quite favorable conditions for developing ecotourism. However, Quan Lan commune has more advantages to develop ecotourism in a humanistic direction, because this is an area with many famous historical relics such as Quan Lan Communal House, Quan Lan Pagoda, Temple worshiping the hero Tran Khanh Du, ... along with local festivals held annually such as the wind praying ceremony (March 15), Quan Lan festival (June 10-19); due to its location near the port and long exploitation time, the beaches in Quan Lan commune (especially Quan Lan beach) are no longer hygienic and clean to ensure the needs of tourists coming to relax and swim; this is also an area with many beautiful landscapes such as Got Beo wind pass, Ong Phong head, Voi Voi cave, but the ability to access these places is still very limited (dirt hill road, lots of gravel and rocks), especially during rainy and windy times; In addition, other natural resources such as mangrove forests and sea worms have not been really exploited for tourism purposes and ecotourism development. On the contrary, Minh Chau commune has more advantages in developing ecotourism in the direction of natural tourism, this is an area with diverse ecosystems such as at Rua De Beach, Bai Tu Long National Park Conservation Center...; Minh Chau beach is highly appreciated for its natural beauty and cleanliness, ranked in the top ten most beautiful beaches in Vietnam; Minh Chau commune is also home to Tram forest with a large area and a purity of up to 90%, suitable for building bridges through the forest (a very effective type of natural ecotourism currently applied by many countries) for tourists to sightsee, as well as for the purpose of studying and researching.
Figure 3.1: Thenmala Forest Bridge (India) Source: https://www.thenmalaecotourism.com/(August 21, 2019)
3.2.2. Using SWOT matrix to evaluate Quan Lan island tourism
General assessment of current tourism activities of Quan Lan island is shown through the following SWOT matrix:
Table 3.5: SWOT matrix evaluating tourism activities on Quan Lan island
Internal agent
Strengths- There is a lot of potential for tourism development, especially natural ecotourism and humanistic ecotourism.- The unskilled labor force is relatively abundant.- resource environmentunpolluted, still
Weaknesses- Poorly developed infrastructure, especially traffic routes to tourist destinations on the island.- The team of professional staff is still weak.- Tourism products in general
quite wild, originalintact
general and DLST in particularalone is monotonous.
External agents
Opportunity- Tourism is a key industry in the socio-economic development strategy of the province and Van Don economic zone.- Quan Lan was selected as a pilot area for eco-tourism development within the framework of the green growth project between Quang Ninh province and the Japanese organization JICA.- The flow of tourists and especially ecotourism in the world tends toincreasing
Challenge- Weather and climate change abnormally.- Competition in tourism products is increasingly fierce, especially with other localities in the province such as Ha Long, Mong Cai...- Awareness of tourists, especially domestic tourists, about ecotourism and nature conservation is not high.
Through summary analysis using SWOT matrix we see that:
To exploit strengths and take advantage of opportunities, it is necessary to:
- Diversify products and service types (build more tourism routes aimed at specific needs of tourists: experiential tourism immersed in nature, spiritual cultural tourism...)
- Effective exploitation of resources and differentiated products (natural resources and human resources)
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: #0D0D0D; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -3pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Symbol, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:Wingdings; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:Cambria, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: #212121; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
Forms of Testing and Assessment of Math Learning Outcomes in High School -
Current Status of Directing the Implementation of Physical Culture Value Education for High School Students in Cao Bang City -
Developing the capacity to assess students' learning outcomes for teachers at Phu Thong high school, Bac Kan province - 1
To clarify the above issue, the author interviewed 5 teachers on the content: "Teacher, please tell me whether studying and professional activities on foreign languages, information technology, and using teaching technology equipment at the school where you are working are carried out regularly? And how are these activities carried out?" , the interview results showed that all 3 teachers said that these activities are carried out regularly in professional group activities but are mainly carried out in conjunction with other group activities.
The results of the study of professional activity records at 5 surveyed schools showed that in the system of plans to direct professional activities for the 2017-2018 school year, there was no separate plan for this activity; this activity was integrated into
The part on implementing teaching experience (criteria for using IT and teaching equipment) and the foreign language criteria are only mentioned in the end-of-year teacher evaluation criteria.
The data in Table 2.8 also shows that the 3 surveyed contents on the form of organizing learning and professional activities at school have not received due attention, all 3 contents are assessed to have a level of implementation at "fair" level.
So, to carry out this activity well, school leaders need to diversify the forms of professional activities at school and should develop a plan to effectively use foreign language knowledge, information technology and proficient equipment skills for teachers.
2.3.2.3. Current status of implementing observation activities and drawing experience from observation hours
Conducting surveys of 40 managers and 75 teachers at 5 high schools in Tra On district, Vinh Long province on 4 contents and 2 forms of observing and drawing experience from observing classes at school, the specific survey results are shown in Table 2.9 as follows:
Table 2.9. Evaluation of the implementation of observation activities and lessons learned from observation
TT
Observation activities and learn from experience | Level of implementation | ||||
Average | DLC | XH | Level | ||
Training content, experience gained through project activities hours and experience hours | |||||
1 | Lessons learned about political awareness and character Teacher qualities shown in class | 3.92 | 0.56 | 4 | Rather |
2 | Gain experience in professional and technical skills Professional Standards Requirements | 4.28 | 0.58 | 3 | Good |
3 | Lessons learned from innovation in teaching and education | 4.47 | 0.62 | 2 | Good |
4 | Experience in applying IT, using technology devices in class | 4.56 | 0.59 | 1 | Good |
Form of observation | |||||
1 | Observe each other's study time in specialized groups and teams. subject | 4.26 | 0.48 | 2 | Good |
2 | Observe classes at school, school cluster, province level... | 4.28 | 0.65 | 1 | Good |
SHARED | 4.29 | 0.57 | Good | ||
From the data in Table 2.9, it can be seen that the majority of survey participants rated this activity at the level of "good" implementation . Of the four training contents, experience gained through observation and experience gained from observation, 3/4 were rated as good.
performed well. The content " Learning from experience in applying IT, using technology equipment in teaching hours " had the highest average score of 4.56 and was ranked 1st, however, there was one content that was rated at " fair " level, which was the content "Learning from experience in political awareness, teacher qualities shown in teaching hours" with an average score of only 3.92.
The results of the study of professional activity records at the 5 surveyed schools showed that the observation and experience sharing forms of the schools did not include the content of "Experience sharing on political awareness and qualities of teachers demonstrated in teaching hours". The monthly meeting plans of the council and professional group of the schools mentioned the content of activities on "political and ideological work", but it was only a form of propaganda and information. This content was not specified in professional activities through the experience sharing of the teachers' observation hours.
Table 2.9 shows that the average score for the implementation of both training content, experience sharing through observation activities, experience sharing from observation hours and form of organization of observation hours is 4.29, reaching a good level. This is an important professional activity of the school, managers need to continue to perform this activity well to create conditions for teachers to improve their teaching capacity and organize teaching activities well and effectively in the classroom.
2.3.2.4. Current status of implementing specialized activities (school and group level)
Conducting surveys of 40 managers and 75 teachers at 5 high schools in Tra On district, Vinh Long province on the content and form of thematic activities (school and group level), the specific survey results are shown in table 2.10.
Table 2.10. Evaluation of the implementation of thematic activities (school and group level)
Status
Specialized activities (school and group level) | Level of implementation | ||||
Average | DLC | XH | Level | ||
Content of thematic activities (school and group level) | |||||
1 | Topic content as directed by superiors | 4.14 | 0.60 | 2 | Rather |
2 | The subject content is set by the school itself. | 4.15 | 0.59 | 1 | Rather |
Form of organizing the topic (school level, group level) | |||||
4 | Listen to the topic report | 4.26 | 0.61 | 2 | Good |
5 | Organize teaching demonstrations and draw on specialized experiences | 4.25 | 0.45 | 3 | Good |
6 | Organize a conference for all teachers to implement the topic | 4.32 | 0.50 | 1 | Good |
SHARED | 4.21 | 0.56 | Good | ||
Table 2.10 shows that: All survey participants showed that all 3 forms of organizing thematic activities (school and group level) were evaluated at a very high average score with scores from 4.25 to 4.32, all at the level of implementation classified as "good", however, the 2 contents of thematic activities (school and group level) had an average score of 4.14 and 4.15 at the level of classification as "fair", showing that the content of thematic activities has not attracted and appealed to all participating teachers.
Conduct interviews with 5 managers and 5 teachers on the content: " Do you think the content of the thematic activities directed by superiors and proposed by the school itself is really practical for you?". The interview results show that managers and teachers all believe that the content of the thematic activities in general schools is not open but depends a lot on the professional direction of superiors. However, schools are also very interested in this activity and always prioritize building implementation plans to improve the quality of professional activities at school.
According to CBQL2, "The content of professional activities according to school-level and group-level topics is often divided as follows: topics on professional knowledge, on innovation in teaching methods and testing and evaluating students' learning outcomes, topics on improving teachers' pedagogical skills and topics on improving teachers' qualities and professional ethics, etc." The implementation of these topics is not uniform in professional groups in the school, each group will be assigned to report on 1 school-level topic/school year. Through these school-level thematic activities, the groups will exchange expertise, learn from each other's implementation experiences and will implement them widely in the school. Although this implementation meets current needs, in-depth research for each subject of each topic has not been given attention, so there will be professional groups that do not perform well and effectively the topics they are not assigned to research and implement.
2.3.2.5. Current status of self-study and self-improvement activities of teachers
pill
Conducted survey of 115 respondents at 5 high schools in the area
Tra On district, Vinh Long province on the content and form of self-study and self-learning activities
Teacher training, specific survey results are shown in table 2.11.
Table 2.11. Evaluation of teachers' implementation of self-study and self-improvement activities
TT
Self-study and self-improvement activities of teachers | Level of implementation | ||||
Average | DLC | XH | Level | ||
Self-study and self-improvement content | |||||
1 | Self-study, self-improvement in politics, qualities, ethics teacher virtue | 4.10 | 0.60 | 3 | Rather |
2 | Self-study, self-improvement of expertise and profession according to Professional Standards Requirements | 4.10 | 0.57 | 3 | Rather |
3 | Self-study, self-improvement in teaching and education innovation | 4.12 | 0.62 | 2 | Rather |
4 | Self-study, self-improvement in foreign languages, information technology, history use of technology equipment | 4.38 | 0.59 | 1 | Good |
Self-study and self-improvement | |||||
5 | Self-study documents, textbooks, books, newspapers... | 4.29 | 0.64 | 1 | Good |
6 | Self-attend training courses, self-study online Internet | 4.17 | 0.63 | 2 | Rather |
SHARED | 4.20 | 0.61 | Rather | ||
Table 2.11 shows that the average score of teachers' self-study and self-training activities is 4.20, which is rated as "fair" . Of the four activities, only the content "Self-study and self-training in foreign languages, information technology, and use of technological equipment" has an average score of "good" at 4.38, ranked 1st, followed by the content "Self-study and self-training in innovation in teaching and education" ranked 2nd with an average score of 4.12. The remaining two contents have equal rankings, "Self-study and self-training in professional skills and skills according to the requirements of professional standards" and "Self-study and self-training in politics, qualities, and ethics of teachers" with an average score of 4.10, all three contents are rated as "fair". The specific survey results are shown in Table 2.11 below.
Through studying the records of 5 schools participating in the survey (reports on foreign language and IT proficiency and equipment and technology data), it shows that the number of teachers with foreign language and IT proficiency from grade A or higher is over 90%. This result coincides with the evaluation results of this activity in the data table 2.11 above.
In the two forms of self-study and self-improvement of teachers, the form of "Self-study of documents, textbooks, books, newspapers..." has an average score of 4.29, higher than the other form.
“Self-attending training courses, self-studying via the internet” with an average score of 4.17. This shows that it is not suitable for the actual foreign language and computer skills of the teacher.
Conduct interviews with 5 teachers at 5 schools with the content "How do you evaluate the form of self-study and self-development activities of teachers at the unit?" Teacher 2 who teaches History frankly admitted: " I have a B level of foreign language and IT, but when participating in remote training, or in the process of self-study and self-research related to online software applications, I often encounter many difficulties. " This shows that, even though there are certificates and qualifications according to regulations, the actual application of that knowledge is not always successful. Therefore, management levels need to pay attention and create conditions for teachers to regularly use knowledge that has been practically applied in teaching and must encourage regular use, along with providing adequate equipment and means for teachers to be more convenient in self-study, self-development and effectively apply that knowledge in practical work.
2.3.2.6. Summary of survey results on the current status of implementing regular training activities for teachers at high schools in Tra On district, Vinh Long province
Synthesizing the survey results using questionnaires for 115 survey subjects (management staff and teachers) in 5 high schools, the evaluation results in table 2.12 show:
All 40 managers surveyed at 5 high schools in Tra On district assessed the implementation level of 5 contents of BDTX for teachers at the "good" level, specifically: "Learning and professional activities at school" had the highest average score of 4.61, ranked 1st; "Specialized activities (school and group level)" was ranked 2nd with a lower average score of 4.46; "Self-study and self-training activities of teachers" had an average score of 4.45, ranked 3rd; "Observing and drawing experience from observed classes" was ranked 4th and had an average score of 4.39; "Concentrated training activities according to the call of the Department of Education and Training" was assessed at the lowest level with an average score of 4.24. This shows that managers have a very optimistic assessment of the contents of BDTX for teachers at the units. These contents need to continue to be implemented to achieve higher efficiency.
Table 2.12. Summary of assessment of the level of implementation of regular training activities for teachers at high schools in Tra On district, Vinh Long province
TT
BDTX activities for teachers at high schools | Level of implementation | |||||||||
CBQL | GV | Synthetic | ||||||||
Average | DLC | XH | Average | DLC | XH | Average | DLC | MD | ||
1 | Training activities concentrate on the summons of the Department of Education and Training | 4.24 | 0.55 | 5 | 3.40 | 0.71 | 5 | 3.82 | 0.63 | Rather |
2 | Learning activities, professional activities at school | 4.61 | 0.45 | 1 | 3.91 | 06.7 | 3 | 4.26 | 0.56 | Good |
3 | Observation activities and experience of the hour | 4.39 | 0.46 | 4 | 4.15 | 0.66 | 1 | 4.27 | 0.56 | Good |
4 | Thematic activities (school level, group) | 4.46 | 0.44 | 2 | 4.15 | 0.74 | 1 | 4.31 | 0.59 | Good |
5 | Self-study activities teacher training | 4.45 | 0.45 | 3 | 3.70 | 0.59 | 4 | 4.08 | 0.52 | Rather |
SHARED | 4.43 | 0.47 | 3.86 | 0.67 | 4.14 | 0.57 | Rather | |||
The above summary results are illustrated more clearly in the following Chart 2.1:

Chart 2.1. Summary of assessment of the implementation level of professional development activities for teachers at high schools, Tra On district, Vinh Long province
The evaluation results in Table 2.12 also show that: for all 5 contents for the survey subjects who are teachers, all 75 people rated the implementation level of BDTX activities for teachers at the level of "fair" , with an average score from 3.40 to 4.15. Of which, the 2 activities with the lowest rank are "Self-study and self-training activities of teachers" with an average score of 3.0, ranked 4 and "Concentrated training activities according to the call of the Department of Education and Training" was rated at the lowest level with an average score of 3.40. Therefore, when developing measures to manage BDTX activities for teachers, managers need to pay more attention to the 2 activities with quite low ratings as mentioned above.
From chart 2.1, comparing the evaluation results of 2 subjects (management staff and teachers) participating in the survey at 5 high schools on professional development activities for teachers, some notes can be drawn: Schools need to have specific measures to simultaneously promote professional development activities that have been well implemented in schools and develop measures so that "Self-study and self-improvement activities of teachers" and "Concentrated professional development activities as summoned by the Department of Education and Training" can be implemented more effectively.
2.3.3. Current status of conditions for regular training activities for teachers at high schools in Tra On district, Vinh Long province
Conducted a survey of 115 respondents in 5 high schools in Tra On district, Vinh Long province on the current status of conditions for professional development activities for teachers in high schools. The survey results in table 2.13 show: Table 2.13. Assessment of conditions for professional development activities for teachers in high schools in Tra On district, Vinh Long province
TT
Conditions for BDTX activities for teachers at high schools | Level of implementation | |||||||||
CBQL | GV | Synthetic | ||||||||
Average | DLC | XH | Average | DLC | XH | Average | DLC | XH | ||
1 | School facilities (rooms, facilities, equipment, library,…) | 3.60 | 0.49 | 1 | 2.93 | 0.25 | 2 | 3.27 | 0.37 | 2 |
2 | The school's financial conditions serve its activities. BDTX movement for teachers | 3.38 | 0.49 | 2 | 3.35 | 0.60 | 1 | 3.36 | 0.55 | 1 |
SHARED | 3.49 | 0.49 | 3.14 | 0.43 | 3.31 | 0.46 | ||||





