The environment does not affect human health. In addition, awareness of pesticide shell disposal is also paid more attention... the appearance of the flower village is also improved and attracts many tourists.
Developing craft villages in the direction of eco-tourism with environmental protection will be a way to vividly introduce the people and typical products of the locality, will create conditions for service development in the district, gradually contributing to the local budget with green areas of garden houses, effectively serving the needs of local urbanization that are increasingly developing stably.
3.5.1.3 Weaknesses
Besides the advantages for developing craft villages, Thu Duc flower and ornamental craft village has and is having the following disadvantages. These are the challenges that hinder the development of the craft village.
Form of production organization: ornamental plants are still in the form of households, small scale, based on experience, family tradition, lack of investment in science and technology, no connection between production and consumption, so the competitiveness of products is still low, income of workers and producers is not high.
Moreover, the ornamental flower industry is developing and bringing in high income, but according to the survey results, in the future there will be very few successors and continue to do this job, the shortage of labor and experienced artisans is inevitable (reason: children of ornamental plant growers have followed their own path, and do not want to do this job...). Therefore, the craft village is gradually fading away, and this is also one of the reasons why sustainable development is needed for the craft village to survive in the long term.
Farming households participating in production in craft villages are still small, fragmented, not concentrated, and there is no connection or cooperation between households to increase production quality.
In general, in the flower village, there are many different production models suitable for the geographical location and land fund of each household as well as economic capacity. The land fund is almost fully exploited, it can be planted in front of the house, in the area around the house, next to the river bank.
River. Shows that there must be specific planning to avoid impacts on the ecosystem and environment.
Households are not interested in promoting and introducing products widely through services, websites... to have many customers, but mainly because they have been doing it for a long time, have connections or are introduced through acquaintances, so they have the ability to develop widely and become known to many people.
3.5.1.4 Risk
Risks to product quality due to the impact of weather factors: Flooding due to heavy rain and high tides in low-lying areas of the district still occurs in the last months of the year and the current state of water pollution due to factories and enterprises discharging to the production conditions of farmers, especially for ornamental flower gardens located near the canal system, has not been completely resolved. However, today, with the advancement of science and technology and the learning of garden artisans, they can use the knowledge accumulated over many years and the support of tools such as light bulbs, roofs, etc. to proactively bloom the flowers of ornamental apricot trees because the early or late blooming depends mainly on the temperature. If the weather is too cold, gardeners can increase the temperature by turning on light bulbs, limiting watering, but if the temperature is high, gardeners can use roofs to block solar energy and water the plants more.
Therefore, households now have measures to overcome and avoid most of the risks caused by weather.
Market fluctuations: due to uneven consumer demand and product quantity on the market, there are years of poor harvests when goods are scarce, and years of good harvests when prices of ornamental plants also decrease.
Impact of urbanization: In agricultural production in general and ornamental plant production in general and ornamental plant production in particular, there are more and more difficulties due to the urbanization process, the area of agricultural land is increasingly narrowing and most of it is located in areas planned for construction, compensation is being made to specialized land for building infrastructure, industry, trade, and services.
and new residential areas. The area of ornamental flowers in the ornamental flower village by the end of 2010 was 114.29 hectares, only 7.92% of the plan, due to the impact of site clearance for the Tan Son Nhat - Binh Loi - Outer Ring Road project; some areas of land for cultivating ornamental flowers in Hiep Binh Chanh and Linh Dong wards were cleared.
Impact on public health: Because most households produce right at home, the distance between the garden and the house is not far, the problem of improper use of plant protection equipment can cause some impacts on human health.
Adverse impact on the environment: due to the influence of pesticides, soil and water environments may be affected.
3.5.2 Assessment of the development potential of ornamental flower villages in Thu Duc district in the direction of eco-tourism associated with environmental protection
Currently, Thu Duc flower village mainly operates in the production and trading of apricot flowers, orchids and ornamental plants. There are no tourism activities, so there is no investment in infrastructure and technical infrastructure to serve tourism, but only for production. In addition, environmental issues in the craft village have not received due attention and investment in wastewater and solid waste collection and treatment systems. Therefore, in this section, the thesis will evaluate the natural conditions and resources of Thu Duc flower village to assess the potential, favorable level, and suitability for tourism development in the future. The infrastructure and technical infrastructure indicators and criteria for community participation will not be evaluated and solutions to overcome these problems will be proposed in chapter 6 to develop the eco-tourism craft village in combination with environmental protection.
Based on the proposed criteria in chapter 4, the potential assessment of natural conditions and resources of Thu Duc ornamental flower village is as follows:
3.5.2.1 Attractiveness
The most typical feature of Thu Duc ornamental flower village is the apricot blossom. “The apricot tree is very picky. To have a beautiful Tet apricot tree, it must have all four elements: “first shape – second base – third decay”.
– posture”. To have yellow apricot trees worth hundreds of millions, gardeners must spend at least 5 years planting, caring for and shaping the apricot trees.
Speaking of apricot blossoms, everyone knows about Thu Duc ornamental flower village, flower village.
No one knows when it was formed, but over the years and generations, it has created a brand of apricot blossoms in the hearts of the city's people. With that long-standing tradition, Thu Duc ornamental flower craft village is now a gathering place for famous artisans and rare, valuable apricot varieties that are not available anywhere else. This is a special feature, a precious tree, endemic to the craft village.
At Thu Duc ornamental flower village today, the total area for growing apricot trees is more than 100 hectares with different sizes, shapes, types and values, from a few million VND to hundreds of millions, including valuable trees from many years ago that are also gathered in the flower village.
Some valuable and typical apricot trees in Thu Duc ornamental flower village:
- Mai garden of Mr. Giang Kien Hoa (born 1966, Hiep Binh Phuoc ward, Thu Duc district, Ho Chi Minh City) with 2 ancient mai trees over 100 years old.
- Some rare and valuable apricot trees in Minh Thuy apricot garden of Mr. Phan Xuan Thong, Hiep Binh Phuoc ward, Thu Duc district: Water hyacinth apricot, number 8 shaped apricot (prosperity - wealth).[19]
Not only famous for its rare and valuable apricot varieties, Thu Duc ornamental flower village is also famous for its valuable ornamental plants.
In addition to being famous for its flower village, Thu Duc district also has a number of ancient cultural relics and famous pagodas, which have great potential for tourism associated with flower village ecotourism. The list of historical and cultural relics in Thu Duc area is shown in Table 5-1.[21]
Table 3-7. List of historical and cultural relics in Thu Duc district
STT
NAME OF THE SITE | ADDRESS | DECISION | Organizations and individuals who are owners or direct continue management | |
National Monument | ||||
1 | Relics Truong Tho Communal House Art Architecture | Truong Tho Ward | No. 39/2002/QD- BVHTT, December 30, 2002 | Board of Trustees |
2 | Architectural and artistic monuments Xuan Hiep Communal House | Linh Xuan Ward | No. 101/2004/QD- BVHTT, December 15, 2004 | Board of Trustees |
City level monument | ||||
3 | Architectural and artistic monuments Linh Tay Temple | Ward 2, Linh Tay Ward | No. 328/2003/QD- UB, December 31, 2003 | Board of Trustees |
4 | Architectural and artistic monuments Thien Phuoc Pagoda | 37/217 Ward 8, Truong Tho Ward | No. 24/2005/QD- UB, February 1, 2005 | Board of Trustees |
5 | Architectural and artistic monuments Tomb of the Ancestor Ta Duong Minh | Number 10 Street 10 Ward 4, Linh Chieu ward | No. 3266/QD- People's Committee, July 27, 2007 | People's Committee of Linh Chieu Ward |
6 | Architectural and artistic monuments Binh Tho Communal House | Road No. 2 Ward 7, Truong Tho Ward | No. 3036/QD- People's Committee, June 20, 2009 | Board of Trustees |
7 | Architectural and artistic monuments Sung Duc Pagoda | No. 50, Street No. 3, Ward 6, Ward Longevity | No. 3040/QD- People's Committee, June 20, 2009 | Board of Trustees |
8 | Chau Hung Pagoda historical site | 37 Cay Keo Street, Ward 1, Tam Phu | No. 3946/QD- People's Committee, August 18, 2011 | Venerable Thich Tac Lanh |
Maybe you are interested!
-
Lessons Learned From Craft Village Development Policy In Bac Ninh -
Bat Trang pottery village and its potential for tourism development - 1 -
Solutions for tourism development in Tien Lang - 10
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism, tourism development
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
- District People's Committees and authorities of communes with tourist attractions should support, promote, and provide necessary information to people, helping them improve their knowledge about tourism. Raise tourism awareness for local people.
*
* *
Due to limited knowledge and research time, the thesis inevitably has shortcomings. Therefore, I look forward to receiving guidance from teachers, experts as well as your comments to make the thesis more complete.
Chapter III Conclusion
Through the issues presented in Chapter II, we can come to some conclusions:
Based on the strengths of available tourism resources, the types of tourism in Tien Lang that need to be promoted in the coming time are sightseeing and resort tourism, discovery tourism, weekend tourism. To improve the quality and diversify tourism products, Tien Lang district needs to combine with local cultural tourism resources, at the same time combine with surrounding areas, build rich tourism products. The strengths of Tien Lang tourism are eco-tourism and cultural tourism, so developing Tien Lang tourism must always go hand in hand with restoring and preserving types of cultural tourism resources. Some necessary measures to support and improve the efficiency of exploiting tourism resources in Tien Lang are: strengthening the construction of technical facilities and labor force serving tourism, actively promoting and advertising tourism, and expanding forms of capital mobilization for tourism development.
CONCLUDE
I Conclusion
1. Based on the results achieved within the framework of the thesis's needs, some basic conclusions can be drawn as follows:
Tien Lang is a locality with great potential for tourism development. The relatively abundant cultural tourism resources and ecological tourism resources have great appeal to tourists. Based on this potential, Tien Lang can build a unique tourism industry that is competitive enough with other localities within Hai Phong city and neighboring areas.
In recent years, the exploitation of the advantages of resources to develop tourism and build tourist routes in Tien Lang has not been commensurate with the available potential. In terms of quantity, many resource objects have not been brought into the purpose of tourism development. In terms of time, the regular service time has not been extended to attract more visitors. Infrastructure and technical facilities are still weak. The labor force is still thin and weak in terms of expertise. Tourism programs and routes have not been organized properly, the exploitation content is still monotonous, so it has not attracted many visitors. Although resources have not been mobilized much for tourism development, they are facing the risk of destruction and degradation.
2. Based on the results of investigation, analysis, synthesis, evaluation and selective absorption of research results of related topics, the thesis has proposed a number of necessary solutions to improve the efficiency of exploiting tourism resources in Tien Lang such as: promoting the restoration and conservation of tourism resources, focusing on investment and key exploitation of ecotourism resources, strengthening the construction of infrastructure and tourism workforce. Expanding forms of capital mobilization. In addition, the thesis has built a number of tourist routes of Hai Phong in which Tien Lang tourism resources play an important role.
Exploiting Tien Lang tourism resources for tourism development is currently facing many difficulties. The above measures, if applied synchronously, will likely bring new prospects for the local tourism industry, contributing to making Tien Lang tourism an important economic sector in the district's economic structure.
REFERENCES
1. Nhuan Ha, Trinh Minh Hien, Tran Phuong, Hai Phong - Historical and cultural relics, Hai Phong Publishing House, 1993
2. Hai Phong City History Council, Hai Phong Gazetteer, Hai Phong Publishing House, 1990.
3. Hai Phong City History Council, History of Tien Lang District Party Committee, Hai Phong Publishing House, 1990.
4. Hai Phong City History Council, University of Social Sciences and Humanities, VNU, Hai Phong Place Names Encyclopedia, Hai Phong Publishing House. 2001.
5. Law on Cultural Heritage and documents guiding its implementation, National Political Publishing House, Hanoi, 2003.
6. Tran Duc Thanh, Lecture on Tourism Geography, Faculty of Tourism, University of Social Sciences and Humanities, VNU, 2006
7. Hai Phong Center for Social Sciences and Humanities, Some typical cultural heritages of Hai Phong, Hai Phong Publishing House, 2001
8. Nguyen Ngoc Thao (editor-in-chief, Tourism Geography, Hai Phong Publishing House, two volumes (2001-2002)
9. Nguyen Minh Tue and group of authors, Hai Phong Tourism Geography, Ho Chi Minh City Publishing House, 1997.
10. Nguyen Thanh Son, Hai Phong Tourism Territory Organization, Associate Doctoral Thesis in Geological Geography, Hanoi, 1996.
11. Decision No. 2033/QD – UB on detailed planning of Tien Lang town, Hai Phong city until 2020.
12. Department of Culture, Information, Hai Phong Museum, Hai Phong relics
- National ranked scenic spot, Hai Phong Publishing House, 2005. 13. Tien Lang District People's Committee, Economic Development Planning -
Culture - Society of Tien Lang district to 2010.
14.Website www.HaiPhong.gov.vn
APPENDIX 1
List of national ranked monuments
STT
Name of the monument
Number, year of decisiondetermine
Location
1
Gam Temple
938 VH/QĐ04/08/1992
Cam Khe Village- Toan Thang commune
2
Doc Hau Temple
9381 VH/QĐ04/08/1992
Doc Hau Village –Toan Thang commune
3
Cuu Doi Communal House
3207 VH/QĐDecember 30, 1991
Zone II of townTien Lang
4
Ha Dai Temple
938 VH/QĐ04/08/1992
Ha Dai Village –Tien Thanh commune
APPENDIX II
STT
Name of the monument
Number, year of decision
Location
1
Phu Ke Pagoda Temple
178/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Zone 1 - townTien Lang
2
Trung Lang Temple
178/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Zone 4 – townTien Lang
3
Bao Khanh Pagoda
1900/QD-UBAugust 24, 2006
Nam Tu Village -Kien Thiet commune
4
Bach Da Pagoda
1792/QD-UB11/11/2002
Hung Thang Commune
5
Ngoc Dong Temple
177/QD-UBNovember 27, 2005
Tien Thanh Commune
6
Tomb of Minister TSNhu Van Lan
2848/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2003
Nam Tu Village -Kien Thiet commune
7
Canh Son Stone Temple
2160/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2003
Van Doi Commune –Doan Lap
8
Meiji Temple
2259/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2002
Toan Thang Commune
9
Tien Doi Noi Temple
477/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2005
Doan Lap Commune
10
Tu Doi Temple
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Doan Lap Commune
11
Duyen Lao Temple
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Tien Minh Commune
12
Dinh Xuan Uc Pagoda
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Bac Hung Commune
13
Chu Khe Pagoda
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Hung Thang Commune
14
Dong Dinh
2848/QD-UBNovember 21, 2002
Vinh Quang Commune
15
President's Memorial HouseTon Duc Thang
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
NT Quy Cao
Ha Dai Temple
Ben Vua Temple
Tien Lang hot spring
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 16pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 6pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 12pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
Identify Rating Levels and Rating Scales
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism,quan lan,quang ninh,ecology,ecotourism,minh chau,van don,geography,geographical basis,tourism development,science
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
of the islanders. Therefore, this indicator will be divided into two sub-indicators:
a1. Natural tourism attractiveness a2. Cultural tourism attractiveness
b. Tourist capacity
The two island communes in Quan Lan have different capacities to receive tourists. Minh Chau Commune is home to many standard hotels and resorts, attracting high-income domestic and international tourists. Meanwhile, Quan Lan Commune has many motels mainly built and operated by local people, so the scale and quality are not high, and will be suitable for ordinary tourists such as students.
c. Time of exploitation of Quan Lan Island Commune:
Quan Lan tourism is seasonal due to weather and climate conditions and festivals only take place on certain days of the year, specifically in spring. In Quan Lan commune, the period from April to June and from September to November is considered the best time to visit Quan Lan because the cultural tourism activities are mainly associated with festivals taking place during this time.
Minh Chau island commune:
Tourism exploitation time is all year round, because this is a place with a number of tourist attractions with diverse ecosystems such as Bai Tu Long National Park Research Center, Tram forest, Turtle Laying Beach, so besides coming to the beach for tourism and vacation in the summer, Minh Chau will attract research groups to come for tourism combined with research at other times of the year.
d. Sustainability
The sustainability of ecotourism sites in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes depends on the sensitivity of the ecosystems to climate changes.
landscape. In general, these tourist destinations have a fairly high level of sustainability, because they are natural ecosystems, planned and protected. However, if a large number of tourists gather at certain times, it can exceed the carrying capacity and affect the sustainability of the environment (polluted beaches, damaged trees, animals moving away from their habitats, etc.), then the sustainability of the above ecosystems (natural ecosystems, human ecosystems) will also be affected and become less sustainable.
e. Location and accessibility
Both island communes have ports to take tourists to visit from Van Don wharf:
- Quan Lan – Van Don traffic route:
Phuc Thinh – Viet Anh high-speed boat and Quang Minh high-speed boat, depart at 8am and 2pm from Van Don to Quan Lan, and at 7am and 1pm from Quan Lan to Van Don. There are also wooden boats departing at 7am and 1pm.
- Van Don - Minh Chau traffic route:
Chung Huong high-speed train, Minh Chau train, morning 7:30 and afternoon 13:30 from Van Don to Minh Chau, morning 6:30 and afternoon 13:00 from Minh Chau to Van Don.
f. Infrastructure
Despite receiving investment attention, the issue of infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism on Quan Lan Island is still an issue that needs to be resolved because it has a direct impact on the implementation of ecotourism activities. The minimum conditions for serving tourists such as accommodation, electricity, water, communication, especially medical services, and security work need to be given top priority. Ecotourism spots in Minh Chau commune are assessed to have better infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism because there are quite complete and synchronous conditions for serving tourists, meeting many needs of domestic and foreign tourists.
3.2.1.4. Determine assessment levels and assessment scales
Corresponding to the levels of each criterion, the index is the score of those levels in the order of 4, 3, 2, 1 decreasing according to the standard of each level: very attractive (4), attractive (3), average (2), less attractive (1).
3.2.1.5. Determining the coefficients of the criteria
For the assessment of DLST in the two communes of Quan Lan and Minh Chau islands, the students added evaluation coefficients to show the importance of the criteria and indicators as follows:
Coefficient 3 with criteria: Attractiveness, Exploitation time. These are the 2 most important criteria for attracting tourists to tourism in general and eco-tourism in particular, so they have the highest coefficient.
Coefficient 2 with criteria: Capacity, Infrastructure, Location and accessibility . Because the assessment area is an island commune of Van Don district, the above criteria are selected by the author with appropriate coefficients at the average level.
Coefficient 1 with criteria: Sustainability. Quan Lan has natural and human-made ecotourism sites, with high biodiversity and little impact from local human factors. Most of the ecotourism sites are still wild, so they are highly sustainable.
3.2.1.6. Results of DLST assessment on Quan Lan island
a. Assessment of the potential for natural tourism development
For Minh Chau commune:
+ Natural tourism attractiveness is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined as average (2 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of Capacity criterion is 2 x 2 = 4.
+ Exploitation time is long (4 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Exploitation time criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is assessed as good (3 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 3 x 2 = 6 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Minh Chau commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 4 + 12 + 4 + 4 + 6 = 42 points
Similar assessment for Quan Lan commune, we have the following table:
Table 3.3: Assessment of the potential for natural ecotourism development in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of self-tourismof course
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
CommuneMinh Chau
12
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
42/52
Quan CommuneLan
6
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
33/52
b. Assessment of the potential for humanistic tourism development
For Quan Lan commune:
+ The attractiveness of human tourism is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined to be large (3 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Capacity criterion is 3 x 2 = 6.
+ Mining time is average (3 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Mining time criterion is 3 x 3 = 9.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points.
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is rated as average (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Quan Lan commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 6 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 4 = 36 points.
Similar assessment with Minh Chau commune we have the following table:
Table 3.4: Assessment of the potential for developing humanistic eco-tourism in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of human tourismliterature
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Quan CommuneLan
12
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
39/52
Minh CommuneChau
6
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
36/52
Basically, both Minh Chau and Quan Lan localities have quite favorable conditions for developing ecotourism. However, Quan Lan commune has more advantages to develop ecotourism in a humanistic direction, because this is an area with many famous historical relics such as Quan Lan Communal House, Quan Lan Pagoda, Temple worshiping the hero Tran Khanh Du, ... along with local festivals held annually such as the wind praying ceremony (March 15), Quan Lan festival (June 10-19); due to its location near the port and long exploitation time, the beaches in Quan Lan commune (especially Quan Lan beach) are no longer hygienic and clean to ensure the needs of tourists coming to relax and swim; this is also an area with many beautiful landscapes such as Got Beo wind pass, Ong Phong head, Voi Voi cave, but the ability to access these places is still very limited (dirt hill road, lots of gravel and rocks), especially during rainy and windy times; In addition, other natural resources such as mangrove forests and sea worms have not been really exploited for tourism purposes and ecotourism development. On the contrary, Minh Chau commune has more advantages in developing ecotourism in the direction of natural tourism, this is an area with diverse ecosystems such as at Rua De Beach, Bai Tu Long National Park Conservation Center...; Minh Chau beach is highly appreciated for its natural beauty and cleanliness, ranked in the top ten most beautiful beaches in Vietnam; Minh Chau commune is also home to Tram forest with a large area and a purity of up to 90%, suitable for building bridges through the forest (a very effective type of natural ecotourism currently applied by many countries) for tourists to sightsee, as well as for the purpose of studying and researching.
Figure 3.1: Thenmala Forest Bridge (India) Source: https://www.thenmalaecotourism.com/(August 21, 2019)
3.2.2. Using SWOT matrix to evaluate Quan Lan island tourism
General assessment of current tourism activities of Quan Lan island is shown through the following SWOT matrix:
Table 3.5: SWOT matrix evaluating tourism activities on Quan Lan island
Internal agent
Strengths- There is a lot of potential for tourism development, especially natural ecotourism and humanistic ecotourism.- The unskilled labor force is relatively abundant.- resource environmentunpolluted, still
Weaknesses- Poorly developed infrastructure, especially traffic routes to tourist destinations on the island.- The team of professional staff is still weak.- Tourism products in general
quite wild, originalintact
general and DLST in particularalone is monotonous.
External agents
Opportunity- Tourism is a key industry in the socio-economic development strategy of the province and Van Don economic zone.- Quan Lan was selected as a pilot area for eco-tourism development within the framework of the green growth project between Quang Ninh province and the Japanese organization JICA.- The flow of tourists and especially ecotourism in the world tends toincreasing
Challenge- Weather and climate change abnormally.- Competition in tourism products is increasingly fierce, especially with other localities in the province such as Ha Long, Mong Cai...- Awareness of tourists, especially domestic tourists, about ecotourism and nature conservation is not high.
Through summary analysis using SWOT matrix we see that:
To exploit strengths and take advantage of opportunities, it is necessary to:
- Diversify products and service types (build more tourism routes aimed at specific needs of tourists: experiential tourism immersed in nature, spiritual cultural tourism...)
- Effective exploitation of resources and differentiated products (natural resources and human resources)
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: #0D0D0D; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -3pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Symbol, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:Wingdings; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:Cambria, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: #212121; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
Initial research on Dong Ky wooden village in tourism development in the Northern Delta - 6

In addition, Thu Duc district has 101 Buddhist monasteries, pagodas, hermitages, and Buddhist prayer halls with about 606 permanent and temporary monks and nuns and nearly 50,000 Buddhist followers.
Thu Duc District is also the residence of the Venerable Monks who lead the Church. Among them, there are some famous pagodas that are among the famous pagodas in Ho Chi Minh City such as:
- One Pillar Pagoda - Nam Thien Nhat Tru Pagoda (Dang Van Bi Street, Binh Tho Ward, Thu Duc District, Ho Chi Minh City) as shown in Figure 5-11 was inaugurated on April 8, 1958 by Venerable Thich Tri Dung and a disciple named Do Thi Vinh. It is considered one of the pagodas with unique architecture in Saigon. In addition, when coming here, people can also worship the 61kg statue of Bodhisattva Ksitigarbha cast in precious metal.[22]
- Van Duc Pagoda - the pagoda with the tallest main hall in Vietnam according to Figure 5-12, the main hall of Van Duc Pagoda is 43.5m high. This place is considered one of the large-scale religious architectural works in Ho Chi Minh City. In addition to its aesthetic value, the pagoda is also a model for the art of creating shapes in modern architecture.[22]
3.5.2.2 Capacity
Capacity = Average standard per individual/Area used by visitors[24]
Ecotourism in the flower and ornamental craft village with picnic standards of 60 - 90m2 / person/day to ensure that the capacity is not overloaded for the ecosystem in the area. The total area of the Thu Duc flower and ornamental craft village is more than 100ha.
So the capacity of the craft village area is 1,000,000/90 = 11,111 visitors/day
a. Connectivity
Thu Duc District is located in the Northeast of Ho Chi Minh City, about 7km from the city center. Bordering District 2, District 9, District 12 and Di An town, Binh Duong province, it is very convenient to connect tourist areas in the surrounding areas.
The places that can be linked to tourism include places in the city center, District 1 such as Ben Thanh market, Independence Palace, Ben Nha Rong,... and tourist destinations adjacent to Thu Duc district, District 9 with many potential areas for tourism development such as the national historical and cultural park, Suoi Tien cultural tourism area,
Suoi Mo tourist area, The BCR tourist area, Ao Dai museum, eco-tourism areas in District 9: Long Phuoc eco-tourism area, Thuy Lien,... Besides, District 9 is also famous for its temples, attracting tourists with spiritual needs, visiting temples such as: Buu Long pagoda, Phuoc Long pagoda, Hoi Son pagoda,... shown from Figure 5-13 to 5-17.
In addition, it can also be linked with tourist areas in Binh Duong such as Dai Nam tourist area, Thuy Chau tourist area, Lai Thieu fruit garden, etc.
With its convenient location, Thu Duc flower village has great potential for developing eco-tourism with tours linking to neighboring areas as above.
3.5.2.3Location and accessibility
With famous landmarks in Thu Duc and neighboring districts, a convenient transportation system, accessible by car, motorbike, bus and travel time of only a few hours, participating in a day tour will attract tourists who want to visit for a short time and do not have to travel far.
3.5.2.4 Mining time
Because the biggest feature of the Thu Duc flower village is the apricot blossom, a flower that only blooms during Tet every year, the peak exploitation time is only during Tet month. However, the tourist area in the flower village still has the potential to exploit other months of the year, such as tourists or those who are passionate about flowers and ornamental plants can still come here to visit, learn from the experience of the artisans in the village and can experience "a day as an artisan" learning how to prune leaves, fertilize and shape the apricot tree.
In addition, the flower and ornamental craft village also concentrates many varieties of orchids, ornamental flowers, bonsai, and construction trees that can serve tourists all year round.
3.5.2.5 Sustainability
No natural components are destroyed, if any, they are at a negligible level and are restored after a short time. Tourism activities are not affected and can take place continuously.
3.5.2.6 Safety
Ho Chi Minh City in general and Thu Duc district in particular are places that ensure social security and are not affected by natural disasters, with a pleasant temperate climate. Thu Duc district is located in the equatorial tropical monsoon region; the main characteristic is that a year is divided into two distinct seasons: the rainy season from May to November, the dry season from December to April of the following year. The average annual temperature is 27-28 0 C.
However, street vending activities still occur in this area. Therefore, the safety in the eco-tourism development area is considered quite safe.
From the above analysis and assessment of natural conditions in Thu Duc district, the results of each indicator can be calculated according to Table 5-2:
Table 3-8. Results of assessment of natural conditions for ecotourism in Thu Duc ornamental flower village
Evaluation criteria
Rating Points | Coefficient | ||||
Very high | Quite high | Medium | Least | ||
Attractiveness: quite attractive | 9 | 3 | |||
Capacity: very large | 12 | 3 | |||
Connectivity: very good | 12 | 3 | |||
Location and accessibility: very convenient | 9 | 2 | |||
Mining time: medium | 2 | 1 | |||
Durability: very durable | 4 | 1 | |||
Safety: quite safe | 3 | 1 | |||
Total | 51 | ||||
Thus, the Thu Duc flower and ornamental craft village area has very favorable natural conditions and resources for developing eco-tourism.





