Determining the Composite Score to Assess the Skills of Preschool Children Participating in the Test

124


3.3.5.3. Determine the composite score to assess the KNVĐCB of preschool children participating in the experiment

From the research results presented in Table 3.31 and Table 3.32, the thesis proceeds to build a standard table for comprehensive assessment and classification in assessing the level of VDCB of preschool children (3-6 years old) participating in the study in Ho Chi Minh City according to 3 levels: Good, Achieved and Unachieved. The standard score for comprehensive assessment and classification of VDCB for preschool children participating in the experiment in the inner and outer areas of Ho Chi Minh City according to each age group is presented in Table 3.33 as follows:

3.33. Criteria for classifying the combination of KNVĐCB skills of preschool children


TT


Classification

Score achieved by age

Baby MG

MG children

Preschool children

(Maximum score 70)

(Maximum score 70)

(Maximum score 60)

1

Good

> 49.00

> 49.00

> 42.00

2

Obtain

28.00 - 49.00

28.00 - 49.00

24.00 - 42.00

3

Not achieved

< 28.00

< 28.00

< 24.00

Maybe you are interested!

Determining the Composite Score to Assess the Skills of Preschool Children Participating in the Test


3.3.6. Evaluation of the development of practical skills of preschool children in the experimental group

To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed BTVĐ for the experimental group in the two inner-city and suburban areas, and at the same time, to study the growth rate of the children's KNVĐCB in the two groups above after the experimental period. The thesis conducted a test and compared the KNVĐCB level of the experimental group and the control group in the two inner-city and suburban areas after 6 months of conducting the experiment through comparing the achievements of the KNVĐCB assessment tests for preschool children according to each age group presented in section 3.1. The comparison results are presented in the table

3.34 to table 3.39 as follows:

front and back area TN (=50)



TT


Test stone price

Customer

Before practice

After practice


d


W%


t


P

X

S

CV

X

S

CV

1

10m run out

high output(s)

TN

4.87

0.48

0.03

10%

4.50

0.45

0.03

10%

0.37

7.90%

13.29

< 0.001

Address

4.94

0.46

0.03

9%

4.89

0.49

0.03

10%

0.05

1.02%

1.13

> 0.05

2

Walk on the line

available(s)

TN

5.38

0.57

0.03

10%

5.1

0.52

0.03

10%

0.28

5.34%

5.06

< 0.001

Address

5.37

0.43

0.02

8%

5.36

0.5

0.03

9%

0.01

0.19%

0.39

> 0.05

3

Crawl in the direction

straight

TN

15.01

0.78

0.01

5%

14.73

0.91

0.02

6%

0.28

1.88%

9.29

< 0.001

Address

15.13

0.56

0.01

4%

15.29

0.62

0.01

4%

-0.16

-1.05%

2.84

> 0.01

4

Cow through 03 gates(s)

TN

8.88

0.79

0.03

9%

8.45

0.8

0.03

9%

0.43

4.96%

12.82

< 0.001

Address

8.82

0.54

0.02

6%

8.91

0.63

0.02

7%

-0.09

-1.02%

1.6

> 0.05

5

Climb 3 ladder steps (s)

TN

10.13

0.95

0.03

9%

9.58

1.00

0.03

10%

0.55

5.58%

22.87

< 0.001

Address

9.92

0.86

0.02

9%

10.02

0.99

0.03

10%

-0.1

-1.00%

1.16

> 0.05

6

Jumping far on the spot (cm)

TN

43.8

4.47

0.03

10%

53

4.52

0.02

9%

9.2

19.01%

10.83

< 0.001

Address

43.5

3.68

0.02

8%

51.3

5.03

0.03

10%

7.8

16.46%

11.6

< 0.001

7

One-handed throw

(cm)

TN

155.2

11.47

0.02

7%

172.1

12.38

0.02

7%

16.9

10.33%

16.92

< 0.001

Address

154.8

10.74

0.02

7%

162

10.93

0.02

7%

7.2

4.55%

5.4

< 0.001

pre- and post-TN area (n=50)



TT


Test stone price

Customer

Before practice

After practice


d


W%


t


P

X

S

CV

X

S

CV

1

10m run out

high output(s)

TN

4.91

0.5

0.03

10%

4.54

0.46

0.03

10%

0.37

7.83%

14.65

< 0.001

Address

4.97

0.47

0.03

10%

4.86

0.49

0.03

10%

0.11

2.24%

3.1

< 0.005

2

Walk on the line

available(s)

TN

5.39

0.57

0.03

10%

5.12

0.53

0.03

10%

0.27

5.14%

4.28

< 0.001

Address

5.42

0.41

0.02

8%

5.31

0.5

0.03

9%

0.11

2.05%

2.41

< 0.02

3

Crawl in the direction

straight

TN

15.08

0.8

0.02

5%

14.79

0.92

0.02

6%

0.29

1.94%

9.66

< 0.001

Address

15.21

0.55

0.01

4%

15.24

0.64

0.01

4%

-0.03

-0.20%

0.37

> 0.05

4

Cow through 03 gates(s)

TN

8.95

0.79

0.03

9%

8.53

0.8

0.03

9%

0.42

4.81%

13.25

< 0.001

Address

8.88

0.55

0.02

6%

8.87

0.61

0.02

7%

0.01

0.11%

0.27

> 0.05

5

Climb 3 ladder steps (s)

TN

10.23

0.96

0.03

9%

9.67

1.01

0.03

10%

0.56

5.63%

23.46

< 0.001

Address

10.01

0.86

0.02

9%

9.96

0.97

0.03

10%

0.05

0.50%

0.73

> 0.05

6

Jumping far on the spot (cm)

TN

43

4.29

0.03

10%

52.6

4.97

0.03

9%

9.6

20.08%

12.1

< 0.001

Address

43.4

4.22

0.03

10%

51.7

5.01

0.03

10%

8.3

17.46%

14.71

< 0.001

7

One-handed throw

(cm)

TN

154.2

10.12

0.02

7%

171.7

12.6

0.03

7%

17.5

10.74%

18.85

< 0.001

Address

153.6

8.98

0.02

6%

163.23

11.17

0.02

7%

9.63

6.08%

8.3

< 0.001

pre- and post-TN area (n=50)



TT


Test stone price

Customer

Before practice

After practice


d


W%


t


P

X

S

CV

X

S

CV

1

15m start run

high

TN

5.57

0.56

0.03

10%

5.06

0.52

0.03

10%

0.51

9.60%

4.56

< 0.001

Address

5.54

0.44

0.02

8%

5.12

0.34

0.02

7%

0.42

7.88%

6.42

< 0.001

2

Go straight on

gym chair(s)

TN

5.71

0.59

0.03

10%

5.16

0.56

0.03

11%

0.55

10.12%

5.39

< 0.001

Address

5.72

0.55

0.03

10%

5.49

0.41

0.02

7%

0.23

4.10%

2.81

< 0.01

3

Crawl through 3 gates(s)

TN

15.28

0.91

0.02

6%

14.65

0.87

0.02

6%

0.63

4.21%

4.29

< 0.001

Address

15.36

0.78

0.01

5%

15.23

0.75

0.01

5%

0.13

0.85%

1.07

> 0.05

4

Crawl through 5 gates(s)

TN

6.38

0.67

0.03

0%

5.94

0.59

0.03

10%

0.44

7.14%

4.13

< 0.001

Address

6.41

0.53

0.02

8%

6.11

0.59

0.03

10%

0.3

4.79%

3.03

< 0.005

5

Climb 5 steps

TN

15.62

0.85

0.02

5%

14.86

1.07

0.02

7%

0.76

4.99%

5.07

< 0.001

Address

15.57

0.49

0.01

3%

15.04

0.54

0.01

4%

0.53

3.46%

7.04

< 0.001

6

Jumping far on the spot (cm)

TN

52

5.15

0.03

10%

73.8

5.94

0.02

8%

21.8

34.66%

18.96

< 0.001

Address

51.8

5.42

0.03

10%

62.9

6.32

0.03

10%

11.1

19.35%

10.75

< 0.001

7

Throw far with 2 hands

(cm)

TN

213

23.08

0.03

11%

245

14.98

0.02

6%

32

13.97%

7.81

< 0.001

Address

214.2

22.48

0.03

10%

230.22

19.66

0.02

9%

16.02

7.21%

4.01

< 0.001

anterior and posterior TN ( =50)



TT


Test

Customer

Before practice

After practice


d


W%


t


P

X

S

CV

X

S

CV

1

15m start run

high

TN

5.61

0.59

0.03

10%

5.04

0.53

0.03

10%

0.57

10.70%

5.05

< 0.001

Address

5.59

0.49

0.03

9%

5.19

0.34

0.02

7%

0.4

7.42%

5.35

< 0.001

2

Go straight on

gym chair(s)

TN

5.72

0.57

0.03

10%

5.28

0.55

0.03

10%

0.44

8.00%

4.5

< 0.001

Address

5.75

0.58

0.03

10%

5.58

0.43

0.02

8%

0.17

3.00%

1.85

> 0.05

3

Crawl through 3 gates(s)

TN

15.31

0.95

0.02

6%

14.84

0.89

0.02

6%

0.47

3.12%

3.09

< 0.005

Address

15.38

0.81

0.01

5%

15.39

0.71

0.01

5%

-0.01

-0.06%

0.15

> 0.05

4

Crawl through 5 gates(s)

TN

6.41

0.69

0.03

11%

6.06

0.61

0.03

10%

0.35

5.61%

3.18

< 0.005

Address

6.44

0.54

0.02

8%

6.24

0.61

0.03

10%

0.2

3.15%

2.03

< 0.05

5

Climb 5 steps

TN

15.63

0.87

0.02

6%

15.09

1.09

0.02

7%

0.54

3.52%

3.18

< 0.005

Address

15.56

0.49

0.01

3%

15.18

0.5

0.01

3%

0.38

2.47%

4.65

< 0.001

6

Jumping far on the spot (cm)

TN

51.4

4.95

0.03

10%

73.5

5.83

0.02

8%

22.1

35.39%

19.79

< 0.001

Address

51.7

5.21

0.03

10%

61.05

6.55

0.03

11%

9.35

16.59%

9.19

< 0.001

7

Throw far with 2 hands

(cm)

TN

214.3

21.57

0.03

10%

242.7

13.22

0.02

5%

28.4

12.43%

8.74

< 0.001

Address

215.3

22.53

0.03

10%

225.6

19.05

0.02

8%

10.3

4.67%

2.89

< 0.01


Table 3.38. Assessment of the level of motor skills in preschool children (5-6 years old) of the experimental group and the primary school before and after the experiment (n=50)


TT


Test stone price

Customer

Before practice

After practice


d


W%


t


P

X

S

CV

X

S

CV

1

18m high start run (s)

TN

6.27

0.66

0.03

11%

5.21

0.14

0.01

3%

1.06

18.47%

12.26

< 0.001

Address

6.28

0.44

0.02

7%

5.8

0.37

0.02

6%

0.48

7.95%

6.51

< 0.001

2

Go on the gym bench

sandbag head(s)

TN

7.75

0.61

0.02

8%

6.08

0.54

0.03

9%

1.67

24.15%

23.11

< 0.001

Address

7.64

0.62

0.02

8%

7.50

0.71

0.03

9%

0.14

1.85%

1.77

> 0.05

3

Crawl through 05 gates

(S)

TN

9.12

0.43

0.01

5%

7.38

0.35

0.01

5%

1.74

21.09%

31.72

< 0.001

Address

9.08

0.42

0.01

5%

8.9

0.47

0.01

5%

0.18

2.00%

2.67

< 0.025

4

Zigzag through 4

point(s)

TN

6.38

0.29

0.01

5%

5.54

0.52

0.03

9%

0.84

14.09%

8.88

< 0.001

Address

6.35

0.4

0.02

6%

5.98

0.43

0.02

7%

0.37

6.00%

5.79

< 0.001

5

Jumping far on the spot (cm)

TN

84.3

8.57

0.03

10%

101.6

10.52

0.03

10%

17.3

18.61%

12.48

< 0.001

Address

84.1

8.67

0.03

10%

97.8

5.36

0.02

5%

13.7

15.06%

10.6

< 0.001

6

Throw far with 2 hands

(cm)

TN

262

9.89

0.01

4%

306.4

12.58

0.01

4%

44.4

15.62%

16.19

< 0.001

Address

262.8

10.11

0.01

4%

286.2

10.08

0.01

4%

23.4

8.52%

13.92

< 0.001


Table 3.39. Assessment of the level of cognitive ability of preschool children (5-6 years old) of the TN group and the extracurricular activities before and after the experiment (n=50)


TT


Test stone price

Customer

Before practice

After practice


d


W%


t


P

X

S

CV

X

S

CV

1

18m high start run (s)

TN

6.25

0.66

0.03

10%

5.22

0.14

0.01

3%

1.03

17.96%

11.97

< 0.001

Address

6.27

0.44

0.02

7%

5.83

0.36

0.02

6%

0.44

7.27%

6.09

< 0.001

2

Go on the gym bench

sandbag head(s)

TN

7.71

0.64

0.02

8%

6.13

0.56

0.03

9%

1.58

22.83%

23.03

< 0.001

Address

7.61

0.66

0.02

9%

7.49

0.71

0.03

10%

0.12

1.59%

1.82

> 0.05

3

Crawl through 05 gates

(S)

TN

9.09

0.44

0.01

5%

7.44

0.36

0.01

5%

1.65

19.96%

32.27

< 0.001

Address

9.07

0.42

0.02

5%

8.92

0.46

0.01

5%

0.15

1.67%

2.36

< 0.025

4

Zigzag through 4

point(s)

TN

6.39

0.34

0.02

5%

5.56

0.52

0.03

9%

0.83

13.89%

8.58

< 0.001

Address

6.34

0.41

0.02

6%

6

0.43

0.02

7%

0.34

5.51%

5.67

< 0.001

5

Jumping far on the spot (cm)

TN

84

8.45

0.03

10%

100.3

10.71

0.03

11%

16.3

17.69%

9.58

< 0.001

Address

83.6

8.45

0.03

10%

97.9

5.26

0.02

5%

14.3

15.76%

10.61

< 0.001

6

Throw far with 2 hands

(cm)

TN

262.4

10.61

0.01

4%

305.2

12.33

0.01

4%

42.8

15.08%

15.13

< 0.001

Address

262.8

10.31

0.01

4%

285.2

9.53

0.01

3%

22.4

8.18%

14.67

< 0.001


Analysis of the results from Table 3.34 to Table 3.39 shows that all evaluation indicators are representative enough for the thesis to evaluate and analyze the following indicators (the relative error of the sample mean value is within the allowable range 0.05).

The coefficient of variation (Cv), a parameter reflecting the variability among individuals in the sample set in most post-tests at different ages, shows that most of the indicators have high homogeneity (Cv < 10%) which means that the dispersion among the research individuals is at a high level. In particular, the indicators in the "Balance walking on a gym chair" test of the middle kindergarten children in the inner-city experimental group, the "Long jump in place" test of the middle kindergarten children in the suburban experimental group, and the "Long jump in place" test of the older kindergarten children in the suburban experimental group have average homogeneity (Cv = 11% < 20%) which means that the dispersion among the research individuals is at an average level. However, because the subjects in the study are dispersed due to differences in age and local conditions of each research cluster, it is still possible to compare the parameters between the values ​​obtained at different ages as follows:

* For young children (3 – 4 years old):

From the results of the data analysis in Table 3.34 and Table 3.35, it can be seen that the motor skills of preschool children in the inner and suburban areas of Ho Chi Minh City are different between the control and experimental groups before and after the experiment. The final test results of the experiment in all sports of the experimental group in both the inner and suburban areas have increased after 6 months of the experiment and the difference is statistically significant (t > t 05 ). The final test results of the experiment in the control group only have some sports growth: in the inner city area, there are jumping and throwing sports; and in the suburban area, there are running, balancing, jumping and throwing sports. The remaining sports in the control group (running, walking, crawling in the inner city area and crawling, crawling, climbing in the suburban area) have no difference in performance before and after the experiment (t < t 05 ). Most notably, crawling activity in the inner-city control group decreased.

Comment


Agree Privacy Policy *