Table 4.3: Gender statistics of borrowers
Sex
Quantity | Percentage | |
Male | 51 | 39.2 |
Female | 79 | 60.8 |
Total | 130 | 100 |
Maybe you are interested!
-
Mobile Phone Usage in Hanoi Inner City Area zt2i3t4l5ee zt2a3gsconsumer,consumption,consumer behavior,marketing,mobile marketing zt2a3ge zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts - Test the relationship between demographic variables and consumer behavior for Mobile Marketing activities The analysis method used is the Chi-square test (χ2), with statistical hypotheses H0 and H1 and significance level α = 0.05. In case the P index (p-value) or Sig. index in SPSS has a value less than or equal to the significance level α, the hypothesis H0 is rejected and vice versa. With this testing procedure, the study can evaluate the difference in behavioral trends between demographic groups. CHAPTER 4 RESEARCH RESULTS During two months, 1,100 survey questionnaires were distributed to mobile phone users in the inner city of Hanoi using various methods such as direct interviews, sending via email or using questionnaires designed on the Internet. At the end of the survey, after checking and eliminating erroneous questionnaires, the study collected 858 complete questionnaires, equivalent to a rate of about 78%. In addition, the research subjects of the thesis are only people who are using mobile phones, so people who do not use mobile phones are not within the scope of the thesis, therefore, the questionnaires with the option of not using mobile phones were excluded from the scope of analysis. The number of suitable survey questionnaires included in the statistical analysis was 835. 4.1 Demographic characteristics of the sample The structure of the survey sample is divided and statistically analyzed according to criteria such as gender, age, occupation, education level and personal income. (Detailed statistical table in Appendix 6) - Gender structure: Of the 835 completed questionnaires, 49.8% of respondents were male, equivalent to 416 people, and 50.2% were female, equivalent to 419 people. The survey results of the study are completely consistent with the gender ratio in the population structure of Vietnam in general and Hanoi in particular (Male/Female: 49/51). - Age structure: 36.6% of respondents are <23 years old, equivalent to 306 people. People from 23-34 years old accounting for the highest proportion: 44.8% equivalent to 374 people, people aged 35-45 and >45 are 70 and 85 people equivalent to 8.4% and 10.2% respectively. Looking at the results of this survey, we can see that the young people - youth account for a large proportion of the total number of people participating in the survey. Meanwhile, the middle-aged people including two age groups of 35 - 45 and >45 have a low rate of participation in the survey. This is completely consistent with the reality when Mobile Marketing is identified as a Marketing service aimed at young people (people under 35 years old). - Structure by educational level: among 835 valid responses, 541 respondents had university degrees, accounting for the highest proportion of ~ 75%, 102 had secondary school degrees, ~ 13.1%, and 93 had post-graduate degrees, ~ 11.9%. - Occupational structure: office workers and civil servants are the group with the highest rate of participation with 39.4%, followed by students with 36.6%. Self-employed people account for 12%, retired housewives are 7.8% and other occupational groups account for 4.2%. The survey results show that the student group has the same rate as the group aged <23 at 36.6%. This shows the accuracy of the survey data. In addition, the survey results distributed by occupational criteria have a rate almost similar to the sample division rate in chapter 3. Therefore, it can be concluded that the survey data is suitable for use in analysis activities. - Income structure: the group with income from 3 to 5 million has the highest rate with 39% of the total number of respondents. This is consistent with the income structure of Hanoi people and corresponds to the average income of the group of civil servants and office workers. Those People with no income account for 23%, income under 3 million VND accounts for 13% and income over 5 million VND accounts for 25%. 4.2 Mobile phone usage in Hanoi inner city area According to the survey results, most respondents said they had used the phone for more than 1 year, specifically: 68.4% used mobile phones from 4 to 10 years, 23.2% used from 1 to 3 years, 7.8% used for more than 10 years. Those who used mobile phones for less than 1 year accounted for only a very small proportion of ~ 0.6%. (Table 4.1) Table 4.1: Time spent using mobile phones Frequency Ratio (%) Valid Percentage Cumulative Percentage Alid <1 year 5 .6 .6 .6 1-3 years 194 23.2 23.2 23.8 4-10 years 571 68.4 68.4 92.2 >10 years 65 7.8 7.8 100.0 Total 835 100.0 100.0 The survey indexes on the time of using mobile phones of consumers in the inner city of Hanoi are very impressive for a developing country like Vietnam and also prove that Vietnamese consumers have a lot of experience using this high-tech device. Moreover, with the majority of consumers surveyed having a relatively long time of use (4-10 years), it partly proves that mobile phones have become an important and essential item in people's daily lives. When asked about the mobile phone network they are using, 31% of respondents said they are using the network of Vietel company, 29% use the network of of Mobifone company, 27% use Vinaphone company's network and 13% use networks of other providers such as E-VN telecom, S-fone, Beeline, Vietnammobile. (Figure 4.1). Figure 4.1: Mobile phone network in use Compared with the announced market share of mobile telecommunications service providers in Vietnam (Vietel: 36%, Mobifone: 29%, Vinaphone: 28%, the remaining networks: 7%), we see that the survey results do not have many differences. However, the statistics show that there is a difference in the market share of other networks because the Hanoi market is one of the two main markets of small networks, so their market share in this area will certainly be higher than that of the whole country. According to a report by NielsenMobile (2009) [8], the number of prepaid mobile phone subscribers in Hanoi accounts for 95% of the total number of subscribers, however, the results of this survey show that the percentage of prepaid subscribers has decreased by more than 20%, only at 70.8%. On the contrary, the number of postpaid subscribers tends to increase from 5% in 2009 to 19.2%. Those who are simultaneously using both types of subscriptions account for 10%. (Table 4.2). Table 4.2: Types of mobile phone subscribers Frequency Ratio (%) Valid Percentage Cumulative Percentage Valid Prepay 591 70.8 70.8 70.8 Pay later 160 19.2 19.2 89.9 Both of the above 84 10.1 10.1 100.0 Total 835 100.0 100.0 The above figures show the change in the psychology and consumption habits of Vietnamese consumers towards mobile telecommunications services, when the use of prepaid subscriptions and junk SIMs is replaced by the use of two types of subscriptions for different purposes and needs or switching to postpaid subscriptions to enjoy better customer care services. In addition, the majority of respondents have an average spending level for mobile phone services from 100 to 300 thousand VND (406 ~ 48.6% of total respondents). The high spending level (> 500 thousand VND) is the spending level with the lowest number of people with only 8.4%, on the contrary, the low spending level (under 100 thousand VND) accounts for the second highest proportion among the groups of respondents with 25.4%. People with low spending levels mainly fall into the group of students and retirees/housewives - those who have little need to use or mainly use promotional SIM cards. (Table 4.3). Table 4.3: Spending on mobile phone charges Frequency Ratio (%) Valid Percentage Cumulative Percentage Valid <100,000 212 25.4 25.4 25.4 100-300,000 406 48.6 48.6 74.0 300,000-500,000 147 17.6 17.6 91.6 >500,000 70 8.4 8.4 100.0 Total 835 100.0 100.0 The statistics in Table 4.3 are similar to the percentages in the NielsenMobile survey results (2009) with 73% of mobile phone users having medium spending levels and only 13% having high spending levels. The survey results also showed that up to 31% ~ nearly one-third of respondents said they sent more than 10 SMS messages/day, meaning that on average they sent 1 SMS message for every working hour. Those with an average SMS message volume (from 3 to 10 messages/day) accounted for 51.1% and those with a low SMS message volume (less than 3 messages/day) accounted for 17%. (Table 4.4) Table 4.4: Number of SMS messages sent per day Frequency Ratio (%) Valid Percentage Cumulative Percentage Valid <3 news 142 17.0 17.0 17.0 3-10 news 427 51.1 51.1 68.1 >10 news 266 31.9 31.9 100.0 Total 835 100.0 100.0 Similar to sending messages, those with an average message receiving rate (from 3-10 messages/day) accounted for the highest percentage of ~ 55%, followed by those with a high number of messages (over 10 messages/day) ~ 24% and those with a low number of messages received daily (under 3 messages/day) remained at the bottom with 21%. (Table 4.5) Table 4.5: Number of SMS messages received per day Frequency Ratio (%) Valid Percentage Cumulative Percentage Valid <3 news 175 21.0 21.0 21.0 3-10 news 436 55.0 55.0 76.0 >10 news 197 24.0 24.0 100.0 Total 835 100.0 100.0 When comparing the data of the two result tables 4.4 and 4.5, we can see the reasonableness between the ratio of the number of messages sent and the number of messages received daily by the interview participants. 4.3 Current status of SMS advertising and Mobile Marketing According to the interview results, in the 3 months from the time of the survey and before, 94% of respondents, equivalent to 785 people, said they received advertising messages, while only a very small percentage of 6% (only 50 people) did not receive advertising messages (Table 4.6). Table 4.6: Percentage of people receiving advertising messages in the last 3 months Frequency Ratio (%) Valid Percentage Cumulative Percentage Valid Have 785 94.0 94.0 94.0 Are not 50 6.0 6.0 100.0 Total 835 100.0 100.0 The results of Table 4.6 show that consumers in the inner city of Hanoi are very familiar with advertising messages. This result is also the basis for assessing the knowledge, experience and understanding of the respondents in the interview. This is also one of the important factors determining the accuracy of the survey results. In addition, most respondents said they had received promotional messages, but only 24% of them had ever taken the action of registering to receive promotional messages, while 76% of the remaining respondents did not register to receive promotional messages but still received promotional messages every day. This is the first sign indicating the weaknesses and shortcomings of lax management of this activity in Vietnam. (Table 4.7) div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9.5pt; vertical-align: 6pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 12pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9.5pt; vertical-align: 6pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 5.5pt; vertical-align: 3pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 8.5pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:"Courier New", monospace; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s25 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s26 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s27 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 1.5pt; } div.maincontent .s28 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s29 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s30 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s31 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s32 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10.5pt; } div.maincontent .s33 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s35 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10.5pt; } div.maincontent .s36 { color: #F00; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10.5pt; } div.maincontent .s37 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10.5pt; } div.maincontent .s38 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 8.5pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s39 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10.5pt; } div.maincontent .s40 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 7pt; vertical-align: 4pt; } div.maincontent .s41 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10.5pt; } div.maincontent .s42 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s43 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 7.5pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s44 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 7pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s45 { color: #F00; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10.5pt; } div.maincontent .s46 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 7pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s47 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s48 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s49 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9.5pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s50 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9.5pt; } div.maincontent .s51 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9.5pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s52 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9.5pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s53 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s54 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9.5pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s55 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10.5pt; } div.maincontent .s56 { color: #00F; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s57 { color: #00F; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s58 { color: #00F; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s59 { color: #00F; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s60 { color: #00F; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s61 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s62 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s63 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .content_head2 { color: #F00; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s64 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s67 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9.5pt; } div.maincontent .s68 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 12pt; } div.maincontent .s69 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 12pt; } div.maincontent .s70 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex
-
Descriptive Statistics on Banking Service Usage
-
Descriptive Statistics of Observed Variables Tangible Media Factor
-
Statistics of Number of Ships Passing Through Ports of Hai Phong, Nam Dinh and Quang Ninh
-
Statistics on Number of Business Customers by Business Type
iii) Ethnicity
According to the survey results, the majority of people who take out student loans are Kinh ethnic group, the remaining ethnic groups are Stieng, Khmer, and Monong. In Binh Phuoc province, ethnic minorities live in remote areas and often have to encourage their children to go to school. The number of families with children who go to school after high school is rare or they are studying but drop out because they do not have the conditions to continue studying at intermediate, college, or university.
According to the survey, Kinh people account for 80% of the 130 borrowers surveyed. Meanwhile, ethnic minorities account for 20%, equivalent to 26 people.
Table 4.4: Descriptive statistics of ethnicity
Nation
Quantity | Percentage | |
Terrible | 104 | 80 |
Other ethnic groups | 26 | 20 |
Total | 130 | 100 |
iv) Education level
The survey results show that the educational level of the borrowers of student loans is not high, of which 20 people have not attended school, accounting for 15.4%, 47.7% of those who have studied up to primary school, equivalent to 62 people, 34 people who have studied up to secondary school, equivalent to 26.2%, and 14 people who have studied up to high school, equivalent to 10.8%. No one has studied at a higher level.
Table 4.5 Descriptive statistics of educational level
Education level
Quantity | Percentage | |
Not been to school | 20 | 15.4 |
To level 1 | 62 | 47.7 |
To level 2 | 34 | 26.2 |
To level 3 | 14 | 10.8 |
Total | 130 | 100.0 |
v) Occupation
The majority of people who took out student loans in this survey participated in small and medium-sized agricultural production, the rest worked in some jobs such as rubber tapping workers, hired workers, small traders, teachers, etc. The survey results showed that the number of people working in agricultural production was 47 people, equivalent to 36.20%, and the number of people working in other jobs was 63.80%.
Table 4.6: Occupational descriptive statistics
Job
Quantity | Percentage | |
Agricultural production | 47 | 36.2 |
Other occupations | 83 | 63.8 |
Total | 130 | 100 |
vi) Number of employees
The number of workers in a family with student loans in the survey ranged from 1 to 6 people. The average number of workers in a family with student loans was 2.61 people, with a standard deviation of 1.103. The majority of families had 2 workers. A few had more than 6 workers.
Table 4.7 Descriptive statistics of number of employees
Number of observations
Average value | Standard deviation | Small value best | Great value best | |
130 | 2.61 | 1.103 | 1 | 6 |
vii) Number of dependents
Overall, the average number of dependents in a family with a student loan is 3, the highest number of dependents is 7, the lowest is 1, the standard deviation is 1.389. The majority of dependents in the sample is 2.
Table 4.8: Descriptive statistics of number of dependents
Number of observations
Average value | Standard deviation | Small value best | Great value best | |
130 | 3.01 | 1,389 | 1 | 7 |
ix) Number of sources of income
According to the survey, the average total income of families with student loans is 2.44, the highest number of income sources is 7, the lowest is 1, the standard deviation is 0.965. The number of income sources is 2, accounting for the majority.
Table 4.9 Descriptive statistics of income sources
Number of observations
Average value | Standard deviation | Small value best | Great value best | |
130 | 2.44 | 0.965 | 1 | 5 |
ix) Number of loans
According to the survey results, the average number of loans is 1.40, the family with the highest number of loans is 3, the lowest is 1 (which is a student loan). A family with more than 1 loan may have more than 1 student or the loan is for another purpose.
Table 4.10 Descriptive statistics of the number of loans for families with student loans
Number of observations
Average value | Standard deviation | Small value best | Great value best | |
130 | 1.4 | 0.689 | 1 | 3 |
x) Saving purpose
According to the survey results, the number of families with student loans who deposit savings to pay off student loans at the Binh Phuoc Provincial Social Policy Bank is 79 observations, accounting for 60% of the total 130 observations. The remaining number either do not deposit savings or deposit savings for other purposes, accounting for 39%.
Table 4.11: Descriptive statistics of savings purposes
Saving purpose
Quantity | Percentage | |
Save to pay off debt | 51 | 39.2 |
Save for other purposes | 79 | 60.8 |
Total | 130 | 100 |
xi) Dependent variable debt repayment ability
According to the survey, the number of observations with the ability to repay debt accounts for a larger proportion than the number of observations with the ability to repay debt.
Saving purpose | Quantity | Percentage |
Inability to pay debt | 69 | 53.1 |
able to pay debt | 61 | 46.9 |
Total | 130 | 100 |
Table 4.12: Debt repayment ability survey results
Thus, through a survey of 130 households borrowing money for students to go to school, the data is summarized in the table below:
Table 4.13. : Summary of some characteristics of the survey sample
Target
Number of households | Percent | |
Total households | 130 | 100% |
Age of household head | ||
In working age | 114 | 88% |
Out of working age | 16 | 12% |
Gender of household head | ||
Male | 51 | 39% |
Female | 79 | 61% |
Nation Kinh ethnic group | 104 | 80% |
Stieng and other ethnic groups | 26 | 20% |
Education level of household head Not allowed to go to school | 20 | 15% |
Study to primary school | 62 | 48% |
Study to secondary school | 34 | 26% |
Study to high school | 14 | 11% |
Job | ||
Agricultural production | 47 | 36% |
Other professions | 83 | 64% |
Number of employees | ||
1-2 people | 74 | 57% |
3-5 people | 44 | 34% |
Over 5 people | 12 | 9% |
Number of dependents | ||
1-2 people | 61 | 47% |
3-5 people | 62 | 48% |
Over 5 people | 7 | 5% |
Number of income sources From 1-2 | 84 | 65% |
From 3-5 | 46 | 35% |
Number of loans | ||
1 | 93 | 72% |
2 | 22 | 18% |
3 | 15 | 11% |
Saving purpose Debt repayment purpose | 51 | 53% |
Other purposes | 79 | 47% |
CHAPTER 4 SUMMARY
Chapter 4 presents the analytical framework and research model of the topic. The analytical framework provides 10 factors that may affect the ability to repay student loans at the Binh Phuoc Provincial Policy Bank Branch, including: age, gender, ethnicity, education level, occupation, number of employees, number of dependents, number of income sources, number of loans, and savings purposes.
With the random sampling method, the sample size was 130 observations, primary data was taken from direct interviews with borrowers, secondary data was taken from the database of the social policy bank of Binh Phuoc province. The results of data collection and descriptive statistics of the variables are presented in this chapter.
CHAPTER 5: RESEARCH RESULTS AND POLICY SUGGESTIONS
5.1. Necessary tests of regression models
Before presenting the regression results, the author performed some necessary tests to ensure that the regression results from the research model have the highest accuracy. The results from the following tests are extracted from the results obtained from SPSS 23.0 software with the collected data.
5.1.1. Pearson correlation test
Pearson correlation test is used to examine the linear relationship between explanatory variables and dependent variables. If the correlation coefficient is large between explanatory variables, then multicollinearity phenomenon should be considered.
Hypothesis H 0 : The correlation coefficient is 0. Therefore, if Sig is less than 5%, it can be concluded that the two variables are correlated with each other. The larger the correlation coefficient, the stronger the correlation. Conversely, if Sig is greater than 5%, the two variables are not correlated with each other.
From the test results presented in Table 5.1, the independent variables number of income sources and number of employees are closely correlated with each other, the correlation coefficient is 0.78, so in the regression process, it is necessary to pay attention to the phenomenon of multicollinearity between these two independent variables. In addition, there are independent variables education level correlated with occupation and number of income sources, savings purpose and occupation are correlated with each other, however, the correlation of these variables is at a low level.
The autocorrelation test also shows that at the 5% significance level, independent variables such as education level, occupation, number of employees, number of dependents, number of income sources, number of loans and savings purpose have a correlation with the dependent variable of debt repayment ability. However, the correlation coefficient is not large. The test results are shown in Table 5.1.
Table 5.1 Results of autocorrelation test between independent variables and dependent variables
Correlations
age | news | people | virgin _study_and_eat | listen p | so_la _VND | so_sleep_my_wife_ medicine | number_of_people app | so_m on_v yes | detail _check | test_person no | ||
age | Pearson Correlation | 1 | -.051 | .040 | -.129 | .059 | .064 | -.076 | .009 | -.026 | -.022 | .032 |
Sig. (2-tailed) | .565 | .651 | .144 | .503 | .468 | .389 | .923 | .771 | .806 | .721 | ||
N | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | |
sex | Pearson Correlation | -.051 | 1 | .110 | .046 | - .178 * | -.086 | .087 | .060 | -.032 | .129 | -.061 |
Sig. (2-tailed) | .565 | .212 | .602 | .042 | .331 | .327 | .500 | .717 | .143 | .491 | ||
N | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | |
ethnicity | Pearson Correlation | .040 | .110 | 1 | -.121 | - .016 | .108 | .011 | .052 | .017 | .008 | -.085 |
Sig. (2-tailed) | .651 | .212 | .172 | .857 | .219 | .900 | .557 | .849 | .929 | .338 | ||
N | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | |
literacy | Pearson Correlation | -.129 | .046 | -.121 | 1 | - .208 * | .240 ** | -.151 | .247 ** | -.115 | .045 | .417 ** |
Sig. (2-tailed) | .144 | .602 | .172 | .018 | .006 | .087 | .005 | .194 | .609 | .000 | ||
N | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | |
career | Pearson Correlation | .059 | -.178 * | -.016 | -.208 * | 1 | .006 | -.004 | -.043 | .051 | .178 * | -.226 ** |
Sig. (2-tailed) | .503 | .042 | .857 | .018 | .942 | .962 | .623 | .562 | .042 | .010 | ||
N | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | |
labor_number | Pearson Correlation | .064 | -.086 | .108 | .240 ** | .006 | 1 | .189 * | .782 ** | -.118 | .029 | .378 ** |
Sig. (2-tailed) | .468 | .331 | .219 | .006 | .942 | .031 | .000 | .180 | .747 | .000 | ||
N | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | |
number_of_women _medicine | Pearson Correlation | -.076 | .087 | .011 | -.151 | - .004 | .189 * | 1 | .090 | .070 | -.098 | -.261 ** |
Sig. (2-tailed) | .389 | .327 | .900 | .087 | .962 | .031 | .308 | .431 | .267 | .003 | ||
N | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | |
number_of_receipts _enter | Pearson Correlation | .009 | .060 | .052 | .247 ** | - .043 | .782 ** | .090 | 1 | -.056 | .022 | .421 ** |
Sig. (2-tailed) | .923 | .500 | .557 | .005 | .623 | .000 | .308 | .527 | .801 | .000 | ||
N | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | |
number_of_clothes | Pearson Correlation | -.026 | -.032 | .017 | -.115 | .051 | -.118 | .070 | -.056 | 1 | .147 | -.368 ** |
Sig. (2-tailed) | .771 | .717 | .849 | .194 | .562 | .180 | .431 | .527 | .095 | .000 | ||
N | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 |