103
within the scope of 4 types of SKH IAa, IAb, IBa, IBb. Of which IBb, IDb account for 44.64% of the total area, and are assessed as potential for developing DLTQ. The results of the assessment of RTL biological criteria, TL DKSKH but ITL landscape and terrain.
i. Ca Mau Peninsula [II.6] Low-lying terrain, little affected by rivers with landscapes of tidal mudflats and coastal saltwater marshes, low-lying fields and inland plains with light acid sulfate soil, brackish water in the rainy season. DK can row a boat into the forests through a dense system of canals, assessing the terrain at the TDTL level. Similar to region II.5, the landscape is quite monotonous, the sea in this area is not favorable for designing a beach due to the characteristics of the muddy material, the sea is not clean (Khai Long) compared to the sea in the Southeast, however, there are small islands with beaches on coastal islands such as Hon Khoai, Hon Da Bac. In winter, the swamps in the forest have flocks of wild ducks, wild geese, geese, cranes, landing on mounds and marshes, creating a very bustling scene. They lay eggs in the grass bushes and are so numerous that people can go boating in one morning to pick up and push a compartment. This form can be combined for PTDL homestay, with a new type that helps visitors both visit and collect bird and duck eggs, so the landscape of TĐTL. Similar to region II.5, this region has RTL biological criteria for developing DLTQ, has a valuable coastal wetland ecosystem in TNB that attracts visitors, which is the National Park - Dat Mui and U Minh Ha Biosphere Reserve (Ca Mau). In which, Dat Mui Biosphere Reserve is an alluvial ecological area, coastal mangrove forests, breeding and resting area of aquatic species in the Gulf of Thailand, a stopover and resting place for many rare migratory birds in the world. In 2009, it was recognized as a World Biosphere Reserve. U Minh Ha National Park is the second national park in Ca Mau, in addition to the unique characteristics of Melaleuca forests on peat soil like U Minh Thuong, "Where is better than the land of Melaleuca forests/ Birds chirping like opera, fish swimming yellow like fish sauce", U Minh Ha National Park is already thrilling through the film Dat Phuong Nam, or the humorous stories of Uncle Ba Phi, the king of Southern lies, recognized by UNESCO as one of the three isolated areas of Mui Ca Mau World Biosphere Reserve. The area is within the scope of 1 type of SKH: IAa,
very hot temperature >26 0 C with lots of rain ranging from 2,200mm - 3,000 mm/year.
The dry season is short, only about 2-3 months, the lowest number of sunny days is only 1892 hours, so ITL allows for the development of DLTQ. In general, the evaluation results of RTL biological criteria, ITL ecological criteria, landscape and terrain criteria of TĐTL
104
j. The Gulf of Thailand's island system [II.7] These West Coast island systems (Gulf of Thailand) are very close to the mainland, easy to travel, the island terrain is very convenient for moving around the island. Phu Quoc is very unique, stretching from the South to the North of the Island is a system of 99 large and small hills. In addition to the hills, there are also plains, 37,000ha of natural forests with many precious woods and birds. The flora in Phu Quoc National Park is quite rich. The vegetation here is mainly evergreen forests growing on low mountainous terrain with a total number of up to several hundred species, including: large trees (melaleuca, beans, ven ven, song nang oil, sand oil, civet, chestnut, sang sot, da, bua), precious orchids (Lan van hai, Am lan nui, etc.), precious herbs (ha thu o, bi ky nam, licorice, etc.). The fauna is also very diverse with 30 species of animals, of which 5 species are listed in the Vietnam Red Book such as: wild wolves, white monkeys, pille gibbons; 200 species of birds with 4 species listed in the IUCN Red List and 3 species listed in the Vietnam Red Book; 50 species of reptiles, of which 9 species are listed in the IUCN list and 18 species are listed in the domestic Red Book. The sea of Phu Quoc is very rich and diverse, the coral reefs around the islands in the south. These coral reefs account for 41% of the area. The fish fauna in the coral reefs is very rich. This place and Con Dao are the only 2 sea areas with dugongs, an endangered species in the Vietnam Red Book. Around the island are many beautiful beaches such as Truong beach, Kem beach, Ghenh Dau, Rach Tram, Rach Vem. DK can swim in the sea, bathe in streams, bathe in rivers, climb mountains, go into caves, go to the forest where you can observe the lives of wild animals. Suoi Tranh is a famous tourist destination in Phu Quoc with beautiful scenery and cool air all year round of the tropical forest. The area is in a type of SKH IAc. The whole area is in the rainiest area of Southern Vietnam. With the above characteristics of high rainfall and many rainy days, it limits the development of DLTQ, the ITL assessment level. However, if you want to avoid storms, the appropriate tourism season in Phu Quoc is in the dry season from November to April every year. But the best time to visit Phu Quoc is from October to March every year, this is when the sea is calm and the weather is nice. The assessment results in the area of biological criteria, RTL terrain, favorable landscape, and ITL tourism.
k. Sea and island area of the East Coast of the Central Highlands [II.8] The sub-equatorial oceanic climate conditions make this area a type of SKH IAa. The period from March to the end of September is the best time to travel to Con Dao. However, from October to February, although the area
Con Dao sea often has big waves but it is the dry season so there is always good sunshine and it is also the right time to come to Con Dao. Assessment of favorable natural conditions for tourism. The area has many beautiful landscapes such as Dam Trau, Lo Voi, An Hai, Dat Doc beaches, fine white sand and clear blue sea water. Dam Tre Bay with natural landscape, sheltered from the wind, surrounded by mangrove forests. Here, it is possible to develop RNM tourism, snorkeling to see coral, watching swiftlets nesting during the breeding season and many other marine species. On both sides are beautiful landscapes of Con Son Bay, Lo Voi Cape, Dat Doc Beach, Chim Chim Cape, Dong Bac Bay. Con Dao National Park has high ecological diversity. The total area is 15,043 hectares, of which: The part on the island is 6,043 hectares and the sea is
9,000 ha, the National Park has a unique terrestrial vertebrate fauna with many endemic species, 37 species listed in the Vietnam Red Book. On the island there are many primeval forests such as Ong Dung, Hon Tre, Bay Canh primeval forests. The typical flora and fauna are coral reefs and especially sea turtles. The results of the assessment of RTL biological criteria, scenic criteria, DKSKH, and TL terrain.
3.2.1.3. Comprehensive assessment results for tourism development
Based on the average score of each region, NCS divides the favorable level of each region for DLTQ into 4 assessment levels. In the selected criteria, their level of influence on DLTQ is different. Based on the characteristics and requirements of DLTQ (1.2.1.5) and according to expert opinion, the factor with the most important level of influence and role is the landscape, the second is the terrain, the third is the biological factor and climate change . This is the basis for determining the weight of the criteria (Table 3.1) (Appendix 5.1 ) . The results of the assessment of the favorable level of DLTQ, we see that the two regions I.3, II.4 are very favorable. The 4 regions I.1, I.2, II.7, II.8 have a favorable assessment level for DLTQ development. Regions II.3, II.6 are favorable for DLTQ. Regions II.1, II.2, II.5 evaluate ITL for DLTQ.
Table 3.5. Summary assessment results for DLTQ of Southern regions
Criteria
Region
Sightseeing | Location | Creature | SKH | Average score | Rating level | |
0.37 | 0.27 | 0.18 | 0.18 | |||
I.1 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3.37 | TL |
I.2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | TL |
I.3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4.00 | RTL |
II.1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1.90 | ITL |
II.2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1.73 | ITL |
Maybe you are interested!
-
Solutions for tourism development in Tien Lang - 10
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism, tourism development
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
- District People's Committees and authorities of communes with tourist attractions should support, promote, and provide necessary information to people, helping them improve their knowledge about tourism. Raise tourism awareness for local people.
*
* *
Due to limited knowledge and research time, the thesis inevitably has shortcomings. Therefore, I look forward to receiving guidance from teachers, experts as well as your comments to make the thesis more complete.
Chapter III Conclusion
Through the issues presented in Chapter II, we can come to some conclusions:
Based on the strengths of available tourism resources, the types of tourism in Tien Lang that need to be promoted in the coming time are sightseeing and resort tourism, discovery tourism, weekend tourism. To improve the quality and diversify tourism products, Tien Lang district needs to combine with local cultural tourism resources, at the same time combine with surrounding areas, build rich tourism products. The strengths of Tien Lang tourism are eco-tourism and cultural tourism, so developing Tien Lang tourism must always go hand in hand with restoring and preserving types of cultural tourism resources. Some necessary measures to support and improve the efficiency of exploiting tourism resources in Tien Lang are: strengthening the construction of technical facilities and labor force serving tourism, actively promoting and advertising tourism, and expanding forms of capital mobilization for tourism development.
CONCLUDE
I Conclusion
1. Based on the results achieved within the framework of the thesis's needs, some basic conclusions can be drawn as follows:
Tien Lang is a locality with great potential for tourism development. The relatively abundant cultural tourism resources and ecological tourism resources have great appeal to tourists. Based on this potential, Tien Lang can build a unique tourism industry that is competitive enough with other localities within Hai Phong city and neighboring areas.
In recent years, the exploitation of the advantages of resources to develop tourism and build tourist routes in Tien Lang has not been commensurate with the available potential. In terms of quantity, many resource objects have not been brought into the purpose of tourism development. In terms of time, the regular service time has not been extended to attract more visitors. Infrastructure and technical facilities are still weak. The labor force is still thin and weak in terms of expertise. Tourism programs and routes have not been organized properly, the exploitation content is still monotonous, so it has not attracted many visitors. Although resources have not been mobilized much for tourism development, they are facing the risk of destruction and degradation.
2. Based on the results of investigation, analysis, synthesis, evaluation and selective absorption of research results of related topics, the thesis has proposed a number of necessary solutions to improve the efficiency of exploiting tourism resources in Tien Lang such as: promoting the restoration and conservation of tourism resources, focusing on investment and key exploitation of ecotourism resources, strengthening the construction of infrastructure and tourism workforce. Expanding forms of capital mobilization. In addition, the thesis has built a number of tourist routes of Hai Phong in which Tien Lang tourism resources play an important role.
Exploiting Tien Lang tourism resources for tourism development is currently facing many difficulties. The above measures, if applied synchronously, will likely bring new prospects for the local tourism industry, contributing to making Tien Lang tourism an important economic sector in the district's economic structure.
REFERENCES
1. Nhuan Ha, Trinh Minh Hien, Tran Phuong, Hai Phong - Historical and cultural relics, Hai Phong Publishing House, 1993
2. Hai Phong City History Council, Hai Phong Gazetteer, Hai Phong Publishing House, 1990.
3. Hai Phong City History Council, History of Tien Lang District Party Committee, Hai Phong Publishing House, 1990.
4. Hai Phong City History Council, University of Social Sciences and Humanities, VNU, Hai Phong Place Names Encyclopedia, Hai Phong Publishing House. 2001.
5. Law on Cultural Heritage and documents guiding its implementation, National Political Publishing House, Hanoi, 2003.
6. Tran Duc Thanh, Lecture on Tourism Geography, Faculty of Tourism, University of Social Sciences and Humanities, VNU, 2006
7. Hai Phong Center for Social Sciences and Humanities, Some typical cultural heritages of Hai Phong, Hai Phong Publishing House, 2001
8. Nguyen Ngoc Thao (editor-in-chief, Tourism Geography, Hai Phong Publishing House, two volumes (2001-2002)
9. Nguyen Minh Tue and group of authors, Hai Phong Tourism Geography, Ho Chi Minh City Publishing House, 1997.
10. Nguyen Thanh Son, Hai Phong Tourism Territory Organization, Associate Doctoral Thesis in Geological Geography, Hanoi, 1996.
11. Decision No. 2033/QD – UB on detailed planning of Tien Lang town, Hai Phong city until 2020.
12. Department of Culture, Information, Hai Phong Museum, Hai Phong relics
- National ranked scenic spot, Hai Phong Publishing House, 2005. 13. Tien Lang District People's Committee, Economic Development Planning -
Culture - Society of Tien Lang district to 2010.
14.Website www.HaiPhong.gov.vn
APPENDIX 1
List of national ranked monuments
STT
Name of the monument
Number, year of decisiondetermine
Location
1
Gam Temple
938 VH/QĐ04/08/1992
Cam Khe Village- Toan Thang commune
2
Doc Hau Temple
9381 VH/QĐ04/08/1992
Doc Hau Village –Toan Thang commune
3
Cuu Doi Communal House
3207 VH/QĐDecember 30, 1991
Zone II of townTien Lang
4
Ha Dai Temple
938 VH/QĐ04/08/1992
Ha Dai Village –Tien Thanh commune
APPENDIX II
STT
Name of the monument
Number, year of decision
Location
1
Phu Ke Pagoda Temple
178/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Zone 1 - townTien Lang
2
Trung Lang Temple
178/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Zone 4 – townTien Lang
3
Bao Khanh Pagoda
1900/QD-UBAugust 24, 2006
Nam Tu Village -Kien Thiet commune
4
Bach Da Pagoda
1792/QD-UB11/11/2002
Hung Thang Commune
5
Ngoc Dong Temple
177/QD-UBNovember 27, 2005
Tien Thanh Commune
6
Tomb of Minister TSNhu Van Lan
2848/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2003
Nam Tu Village -Kien Thiet commune
7
Canh Son Stone Temple
2160/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2003
Van Doi Commune –Doan Lap
8
Meiji Temple
2259/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2002
Toan Thang Commune
9
Tien Doi Noi Temple
477/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2005
Doan Lap Commune
10
Tu Doi Temple
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Doan Lap Commune
11
Duyen Lao Temple
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Tien Minh Commune
12
Dinh Xuan Uc Pagoda
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Bac Hung Commune
13
Chu Khe Pagoda
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Hung Thang Commune
14
Dong Dinh
2848/QD-UBNovember 21, 2002
Vinh Quang Commune
15
President's Memorial HouseTon Duc Thang
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
NT Quy Cao
Ha Dai Temple
Ben Vua Temple
Tien Lang hot spring
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 16pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 6pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 12pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
Identify Rating Levels and Rating Scales
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism,quan lan,quang ninh,ecology,ecotourism,minh chau,van don,geography,geographical basis,tourism development,science
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
of the islanders. Therefore, this indicator will be divided into two sub-indicators:
a1. Natural tourism attractiveness a2. Cultural tourism attractiveness
b. Tourist capacity
The two island communes in Quan Lan have different capacities to receive tourists. Minh Chau Commune is home to many standard hotels and resorts, attracting high-income domestic and international tourists. Meanwhile, Quan Lan Commune has many motels mainly built and operated by local people, so the scale and quality are not high, and will be suitable for ordinary tourists such as students.
c. Time of exploitation of Quan Lan Island Commune:
Quan Lan tourism is seasonal due to weather and climate conditions and festivals only take place on certain days of the year, specifically in spring. In Quan Lan commune, the period from April to June and from September to November is considered the best time to visit Quan Lan because the cultural tourism activities are mainly associated with festivals taking place during this time.
Minh Chau island commune:
Tourism exploitation time is all year round, because this is a place with a number of tourist attractions with diverse ecosystems such as Bai Tu Long National Park Research Center, Tram forest, Turtle Laying Beach, so besides coming to the beach for tourism and vacation in the summer, Minh Chau will attract research groups to come for tourism combined with research at other times of the year.
d. Sustainability
The sustainability of ecotourism sites in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes depends on the sensitivity of the ecosystems to climate changes.
landscape. In general, these tourist destinations have a fairly high level of sustainability, because they are natural ecosystems, planned and protected. However, if a large number of tourists gather at certain times, it can exceed the carrying capacity and affect the sustainability of the environment (polluted beaches, damaged trees, animals moving away from their habitats, etc.), then the sustainability of the above ecosystems (natural ecosystems, human ecosystems) will also be affected and become less sustainable.
e. Location and accessibility
Both island communes have ports to take tourists to visit from Van Don wharf:
- Quan Lan – Van Don traffic route:
Phuc Thinh – Viet Anh high-speed boat and Quang Minh high-speed boat, depart at 8am and 2pm from Van Don to Quan Lan, and at 7am and 1pm from Quan Lan to Van Don. There are also wooden boats departing at 7am and 1pm.
- Van Don - Minh Chau traffic route:
Chung Huong high-speed train, Minh Chau train, morning 7:30 and afternoon 13:30 from Van Don to Minh Chau, morning 6:30 and afternoon 13:00 from Minh Chau to Van Don.
f. Infrastructure
Despite receiving investment attention, the issue of infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism on Quan Lan Island is still an issue that needs to be resolved because it has a direct impact on the implementation of ecotourism activities. The minimum conditions for serving tourists such as accommodation, electricity, water, communication, especially medical services, and security work need to be given top priority. Ecotourism spots in Minh Chau commune are assessed to have better infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism because there are quite complete and synchronous conditions for serving tourists, meeting many needs of domestic and foreign tourists.
3.2.1.4. Determine assessment levels and assessment scales
Corresponding to the levels of each criterion, the index is the score of those levels in the order of 4, 3, 2, 1 decreasing according to the standard of each level: very attractive (4), attractive (3), average (2), less attractive (1).
3.2.1.5. Determining the coefficients of the criteria
For the assessment of DLST in the two communes of Quan Lan and Minh Chau islands, the students added evaluation coefficients to show the importance of the criteria and indicators as follows:
Coefficient 3 with criteria: Attractiveness, Exploitation time. These are the 2 most important criteria for attracting tourists to tourism in general and eco-tourism in particular, so they have the highest coefficient.
Coefficient 2 with criteria: Capacity, Infrastructure, Location and accessibility . Because the assessment area is an island commune of Van Don district, the above criteria are selected by the author with appropriate coefficients at the average level.
Coefficient 1 with criteria: Sustainability. Quan Lan has natural and human-made ecotourism sites, with high biodiversity and little impact from local human factors. Most of the ecotourism sites are still wild, so they are highly sustainable.
3.2.1.6. Results of DLST assessment on Quan Lan island
a. Assessment of the potential for natural tourism development
For Minh Chau commune:
+ Natural tourism attractiveness is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined as average (2 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of Capacity criterion is 2 x 2 = 4.
+ Exploitation time is long (4 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Exploitation time criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is assessed as good (3 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 3 x 2 = 6 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Minh Chau commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 4 + 12 + 4 + 4 + 6 = 42 points
Similar assessment for Quan Lan commune, we have the following table:
Table 3.3: Assessment of the potential for natural ecotourism development in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of self-tourismof course
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
CommuneMinh Chau
12
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
42/52
Quan CommuneLan
6
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
33/52
b. Assessment of the potential for humanistic tourism development
For Quan Lan commune:
+ The attractiveness of human tourism is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined to be large (3 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Capacity criterion is 3 x 2 = 6.
+ Mining time is average (3 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Mining time criterion is 3 x 3 = 9.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points.
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is rated as average (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Quan Lan commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 6 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 4 = 36 points.
Similar assessment with Minh Chau commune we have the following table:
Table 3.4: Assessment of the potential for developing humanistic eco-tourism in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of human tourismliterature
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Quan CommuneLan
12
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
39/52
Minh CommuneChau
6
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
36/52
Basically, both Minh Chau and Quan Lan localities have quite favorable conditions for developing ecotourism. However, Quan Lan commune has more advantages to develop ecotourism in a humanistic direction, because this is an area with many famous historical relics such as Quan Lan Communal House, Quan Lan Pagoda, Temple worshiping the hero Tran Khanh Du, ... along with local festivals held annually such as the wind praying ceremony (March 15), Quan Lan festival (June 10-19); due to its location near the port and long exploitation time, the beaches in Quan Lan commune (especially Quan Lan beach) are no longer hygienic and clean to ensure the needs of tourists coming to relax and swim; this is also an area with many beautiful landscapes such as Got Beo wind pass, Ong Phong head, Voi Voi cave, but the ability to access these places is still very limited (dirt hill road, lots of gravel and rocks), especially during rainy and windy times; In addition, other natural resources such as mangrove forests and sea worms have not been really exploited for tourism purposes and ecotourism development. On the contrary, Minh Chau commune has more advantages in developing ecotourism in the direction of natural tourism, this is an area with diverse ecosystems such as at Rua De Beach, Bai Tu Long National Park Conservation Center...; Minh Chau beach is highly appreciated for its natural beauty and cleanliness, ranked in the top ten most beautiful beaches in Vietnam; Minh Chau commune is also home to Tram forest with a large area and a purity of up to 90%, suitable for building bridges through the forest (a very effective type of natural ecotourism currently applied by many countries) for tourists to sightsee, as well as for the purpose of studying and researching.
Figure 3.1: Thenmala Forest Bridge (India) Source: https://www.thenmalaecotourism.com/(August 21, 2019)
3.2.2. Using SWOT matrix to evaluate Quan Lan island tourism
General assessment of current tourism activities of Quan Lan island is shown through the following SWOT matrix:
Table 3.5: SWOT matrix evaluating tourism activities on Quan Lan island
Internal agent
Strengths- There is a lot of potential for tourism development, especially natural ecotourism and humanistic ecotourism.- The unskilled labor force is relatively abundant.- resource environmentunpolluted, still
Weaknesses- Poorly developed infrastructure, especially traffic routes to tourist destinations on the island.- The team of professional staff is still weak.- Tourism products in general
quite wild, originalintact
general and DLST in particularalone is monotonous.
External agents
Opportunity- Tourism is a key industry in the socio-economic development strategy of the province and Van Don economic zone.- Quan Lan was selected as a pilot area for eco-tourism development within the framework of the green growth project between Quang Ninh province and the Japanese organization JICA.- The flow of tourists and especially ecotourism in the world tends toincreasing
Challenge- Weather and climate change abnormally.- Competition in tourism products is increasingly fierce, especially with other localities in the province such as Ha Long, Mong Cai...- Awareness of tourists, especially domestic tourists, about ecotourism and nature conservation is not high.
Through summary analysis using SWOT matrix we see that:
To exploit strengths and take advantage of opportunities, it is necessary to:
- Diversify products and service types (build more tourism routes aimed at specific needs of tourists: experiential tourism immersed in nature, spiritual cultural tourism...)
- Effective exploitation of resources and differentiated products (natural resources and human resources)
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: #0D0D0D; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -3pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Symbol, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:Wingdings; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:Cambria, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: #212121; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
Assessment of surface water resources in Dong Nai river basin to serve sustainable development goals in the context of climate change - 2 -
Assessment of the Current Status of the Policy on Developing Female Human Resources in the People's Public Security Force -
Assessment of the current status of groundwater resources in the inner city of Hanoi - 2
II.3
2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2.27 | TĐTL | |
II.4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3.64 | RTL |
II.5 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1.54 | ITL |
II.6 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2.18 | TĐTL |
II.7 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 3.09 | TL |
II.8 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3.18 | TL |

3.2.2. Evaluation of tourism resources for resort tourism development
3.2.2.1. Building a rating scale for resort tourism
Areas with favorable climate conditions for human health and beautiful natural landscapes are favorable conditions for the development of resort tourism. The South has 7/11 coastal areas, beautiful beaches have long become ideal resorts for domestic and international tourists to relax and restore their health after tiring working days. NCS selected 4 criteria: Bioclimate, beach, terrain and landscape.
a. Bioclimatic criteria
Similar to the assessment for DLTQ, it is necessary to determine the level of convenience of 12 types of SKH serving DLND. For LHDL resort, among the 3 SKH factors, temperature plays the most important role - weight 0.5, rainfall ranks second with weight 0.33, next is the factor of number of rainy days with weight 0.17 (Appendix 5.6)
Table 3.6. Criteria for assessing the convenience of SKH types for DLND
Bioclimatic indicators
Rating Level | Point | |||
Number of days rain | Average temperature year | Average rainfall year | ||
Weight 0.17 | Weight 0.5 | Weight 0.33 | ||
CD | III | CD | RTL | 3 |
b | II | B | TL | 2 |
a | I | A | ITL | 1 |
Based on the results of calculating the level ( Appendix 6.5) and the average score ( Appendix 6.6) of the SKH criteria for implementing DLND. The area of SKH types in the regions is determined based on the results of overlapping between the SKH map and the DLTN zoning map ( Appendix 4). Calculation results ( Appendixes 6.7 and 6.8 ) Region I.3 has SKH types IDd, ICc, ICb accounting for 82.92% of the area, so it is very favorable for developing DLTQ. Regions I.2, II.1, II.2, II.3, II.4, II.8 are favorable for developing DLTQ because they have SKH types IDb, ICb, IBb, IAc accounting for over 50% of the area. Region I.1 has relatively favorable SKH conditions for DLTQ. Regions II.5, II.6 and II.7 are considered less favorable for DLTQ development because the SKH types IIIAa, IIAa, IAa, IBa account for over 50% of the area.
NCS chose to add the TCI climate index to evaluate the resort tourism in the Southern regions because the TCI index is a synthetic climate index, based on the TCI analysis results, it is possible to choose the adaptation time of the DK to the climate conditions.
b. Beach criteria
The attractiveness of beaches depends on the area and material composition of the beach. Beaches that can organize DLND must meet the technical requirements of a beach such as length, width, solid foundation and made of fine sand, gentle slope, and beach capacity. Currently, there are many different ways to determine the capacity of a beach. According to Decision 02/2003/NQ - BTNMT, the standard capacity of a resort beach is determined as follows: Water surface area for tourists: 15 - 20m²/person; Sand area for one tourist: 10 - 15m²/person; Average density of beachgoers during peak times is 4 people/m of coastline. According to JICA, the standard capacity of a beach for LHDL is determined as follows: Minimum capacity is 1 person/10m of coastline, maximum is 2 people/10m of coastline.
Thus, to evaluate the type of beach tourism in the Southern region, the criteria for beaches are determined according to the following criteria, assessment levels and assessment scores:
Table 3.7. Criteria for assessing the favorable level of beach criteria for DLND
Evaluation criteria
(Structure and average total capacity of beaches by region)
Rating level | Score price | |
Fine sand composition, minimum capacity 2000 people/day | RTL | 4 |
Sand and mud mix, minimum capacity 1000 people/day | TL | 3 |
Mud, sand and gravel composition, minimum capacity 500 people/day | TĐTL | 2 |
Mud composition, minimum capacity 500 people/day | ITL | 1 |
Determine the physical composition of the beaches based on the geomorphological map of the Southern region and its vicinity and verify it in the field. Determine the capacity based on the length of the beach according to statistical data, measured on the GIS system and also verify it in the field. (Appendix 7)
c. Terrain criteria
Terrain also plays an important role in the formation and implementation of DLND. In addition to being a factor creating the background for landscape and accessibility, terrain is one of three factors that create the characteristics of regional climate. Therefore, coastal terrain areas, islands and mountainous areas have favorable conditions due to cool climates and diverse natural landscapes. For the Southern region, TL terrain areas belong to coastal and island terrain types. Areas I.1 with high mountain and hill terrain, although having cool climate conditions, have limited accessibility, so ITL.
d. Scenic criteria
DLND is closely linked to climate conditions and environmental landscape. Some places have beautiful landscapes, especially large lakes where the terrain is low and gentle, suitable for building resorts, sightseeing, with wide, open water surfaces for active resort activities such as boating, bathing, fishing, etc. The Central Highlands region has a dense system of rivers and canals, diverse cajuput, mangrove, and mangrove plants, providing shade, very favorable for resort tourism such as boating on the river. The Southeast region has mountainous areas with lakes on top such as Chan May Mountain (Vung Tau), Buu Long tourist area (Dong Nai) which are very suitable for resort development. Those areas are considered very favorable for DLND development. The appearance of mineral water and hot water exposure points is very significant for DLND. The amount of minerals in the water source, the water temperature as well as the types of mineral mud accumulated in places where mineral water is exposed also have very good medicinal value such as Binh Chau hot spring.
The level of landscape potential for tourism is built based on the results of assessing the favorable level of natural landscapes for tourism.
3.2.2.2. Conduct assessment for resort tourism
Evaluate the terrain and landscape criteria according to the regions that have been evaluated for DLTQ. Below, the author only evaluates the SKH and beach criteria for each region based on the established criteria. In addition, other factors such as mineral water points and medicinal resources are added in the evaluation of DLND.
a. High hilly area of Binh Duong - Binh Phuoc - Dong Nai [I.1] This is an area without beaches, so the evaluation result of this criterion is 0 points. The climate of this area is not much different from that of Ho Chi Minh City, although the temperature is slightly lower due to the influence of altitude and the manifestation of the dry season is more pronounced, the average dry season is about 4-5 months long. The climate conditions of area I.1 are at the level of TDTL for the development of DLND. The months with favorable TCI index for tourism are 5 months from XI to III, in which TCI is more than >60 in December, January and II, March, TCI reaches good to very good levels. In the planning of tourism seasons, it is necessary to pay attention to the remaining months IV, VII, VIII, Ĩ, V, the TCI index is assessed at an acceptable level for tourism activities. The two rainy months are V, VI at the minimum threshold in the year, TCI is not suitable <40 because of heavy rain and strong winds. Especially in June, CID is very low 0.6 high humidity and high temperature makes it difficult to breathe.





