Table 2.1. Assessment of potential and advantages of tourism resources
Resources
Outstanding advantages | ||
Nature | Terrain | The midland and highland terrain combined with the plain and coastal terrain creates beautiful landscapes. Majestic nature, beaches, islands near the shore… along the journey, are great attractions for tourists. |
Climate | Visitors to this area at any time of the year can find beautiful weather or experience many types of weather and climate. suitable for tourist needs | |
Hydrology | Rich hydrology including rivers, streams, lakes, waterfalls, lagoons, hot springs..., many very unique spots and famous for creating a very unique advantage for the region. | |
Eastern flora | The flora and fauna in the National Park are very unique, including high mountain ecosystems, river and lake ecosystems, wetland ecosystems and marine ecosystems. Tourists are very interested in ecological areas and national parks. family, primeval forest, rare animals. | |
Humanities | Cultural and historical relics | The big difference is that on the route there is a combination of 3 cultural heritages, many archaeological sites, the preservation of dinosaur fossils, the dense appearance of historical relics, war relics and spiritual values. very special |
Festival, craft village | Festivals and craft villages are one of the characteristics and advantages of tourism products on the HLKTĐT route. Visitors to this area have the opportunity to participate in festivals almost all year round, and all of them are very unique festivals and craft villages with long-lasting vitality. long. | |
Food, art | Local cuisine and art are among the top concerns of tourists when exploring a destination. This is the strength of the localities on the route with dozens of unique and diverse dishes. performing arts | |
Nation | There are dozens of ethnic groups living together on the Mekong Delta. This is an attraction for tourists as the need to learn about customs, traditional culture, costumes, cuisine, etc. of the ethnic groups is increasing. Community-based tourism is growing. | |
Neighborhood | Combining tourism resources is a great advantage of the HLKTĐT when visitors to this area can easily access many cultural and natural heritages, many famous landscapes, historical and cultural relics, ecological values, and very unique communities in the regions. vicinity. |
Maybe you are interested!
-
Identify Rating Levels and Rating Scales zt2i3t4l5ee zt2a3gstourism,quan lan,quang ninh,ecology,ecotourism,minh chau,van don,geography,geographical basis,tourism development,science zt2a3ge zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts of the islanders. Therefore, this indicator will be divided into two sub-indicators: a1. Natural tourism attractiveness a2. Cultural tourism attractiveness b. Tourist capacity The two island communes in Quan Lan have different capacities to receive tourists. Minh Chau Commune is home to many standard hotels and resorts, attracting high-income domestic and international tourists. Meanwhile, Quan Lan Commune has many motels mainly built and operated by local people, so the scale and quality are not high, and will be suitable for ordinary tourists such as students. c. Time of exploitation of Quan Lan Island Commune: Quan Lan tourism is seasonal due to weather and climate conditions and festivals only take place on certain days of the year, specifically in spring. In Quan Lan commune, the period from April to June and from September to November is considered the best time to visit Quan Lan because the cultural tourism activities are mainly associated with festivals taking place during this time. Minh Chau island commune: Tourism exploitation time is all year round, because this is a place with a number of tourist attractions with diverse ecosystems such as Bai Tu Long National Park Research Center, Tram forest, Turtle Laying Beach, so besides coming to the beach for tourism and vacation in the summer, Minh Chau will attract research groups to come for tourism combined with research at other times of the year. d. Sustainability The sustainability of ecotourism sites in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes depends on the sensitivity of the ecosystems to climate changes. landscape. In general, these tourist destinations have a fairly high level of sustainability, because they are natural ecosystems, planned and protected. However, if a large number of tourists gather at certain times, it can exceed the carrying capacity and affect the sustainability of the environment (polluted beaches, damaged trees, animals moving away from their habitats, etc.), then the sustainability of the above ecosystems (natural ecosystems, human ecosystems) will also be affected and become less sustainable. e. Location and accessibility Both island communes have ports to take tourists to visit from Van Don wharf: - Quan Lan – Van Don traffic route: Phuc Thinh – Viet Anh high-speed boat and Quang Minh high-speed boat, depart at 8am and 2pm from Van Don to Quan Lan, and at 7am and 1pm from Quan Lan to Van Don. There are also wooden boats departing at 7am and 1pm. - Van Don - Minh Chau traffic route: Chung Huong high-speed train, Minh Chau train, morning 7:30 and afternoon 13:30 from Van Don to Minh Chau, morning 6:30 and afternoon 13:00 from Minh Chau to Van Don. f. Infrastructure Despite receiving investment attention, the issue of infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism on Quan Lan Island is still an issue that needs to be resolved because it has a direct impact on the implementation of ecotourism activities. The minimum conditions for serving tourists such as accommodation, electricity, water, communication, especially medical services, and security work need to be given top priority. Ecotourism spots in Minh Chau commune are assessed to have better infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism because there are quite complete and synchronous conditions for serving tourists, meeting many needs of domestic and foreign tourists. 3.2.1.4. Determine assessment levels and assessment scales Corresponding to the levels of each criterion, the index is the score of those levels in the order of 4, 3, 2, 1 decreasing according to the standard of each level: very attractive (4), attractive (3), average (2), less attractive (1). 3.2.1.5. Determining the coefficients of the criteria For the assessment of DLST in the two communes of Quan Lan and Minh Chau islands, the students added evaluation coefficients to show the importance of the criteria and indicators as follows: Coefficient 3 with criteria: Attractiveness, Exploitation time. These are the 2 most important criteria for attracting tourists to tourism in general and eco-tourism in particular, so they have the highest coefficient. Coefficient 2 with criteria: Capacity, Infrastructure, Location and accessibility . Because the assessment area is an island commune of Van Don district, the above criteria are selected by the author with appropriate coefficients at the average level. Coefficient 1 with criteria: Sustainability. Quan Lan has natural and human-made ecotourism sites, with high biodiversity and little impact from local human factors. Most of the ecotourism sites are still wild, so they are highly sustainable. 3.2.1.6. Results of DLST assessment on Quan Lan island a. Assessment of the potential for natural tourism development For Minh Chau commune: + Natural tourism attractiveness is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12. + Capacity is determined as average (2 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of Capacity criterion is 2 x 2 = 4. + Exploitation time is long (4 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Exploitation time criterion is 4 x 3 = 12. + Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points + Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points. + Infrastructure is assessed as good (3 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 3 x 2 = 6 points. The total score for evaluating DLST in Minh Chau commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 4 + 12 + 4 + 4 + 6 = 42 points Similar assessment for Quan Lan commune, we have the following table: Table 3.3: Assessment of the potential for natural ecotourism development in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes Attractiveness of self-tourismof course Capacity Mining time Sustainability Location and accessibility Infrastructure Result Point DarkMulti Point DarkMulti Point DarkMulti Point DarkMulti Point DarkMulti Point DarkMulti CommuneMinh Chau 12 12 4 8 12 12 4 4 4 8 6 8 42/52 Quan CommuneLan 6 12 6 8 9 12 4 4 4 8 4 8 33/52 b. Assessment of the potential for humanistic tourism development For Quan Lan commune: + The attractiveness of human tourism is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12. + Capacity is determined to be large (3 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Capacity criterion is 3 x 2 = 6. + Mining time is average (3 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Mining time criterion is 3 x 3 = 9. + Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points. + Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points. + Infrastructure is rated as average (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 2 x 2 = 4 points. The total score for evaluating DLST in Quan Lan commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 6 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 4 = 36 points. Similar assessment with Minh Chau commune we have the following table: Table 3.4: Assessment of the potential for developing humanistic eco-tourism in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes Attractiveness of human tourismliterature Capacity Mining time Sustainability Location and accessibility Infrastructure Result Point DarkMulti Point DarkMulti Point DarkMulti Point DarkMulti Point DarkMulti Point DarkMulti Quan CommuneLan 12 12 6 8 9 12 4 4 4 8 4 8 39/52 Minh CommuneChau 6 12 4 8 12 12 4 4 4 8 6 8 36/52 Basically, both Minh Chau and Quan Lan localities have quite favorable conditions for developing ecotourism. However, Quan Lan commune has more advantages to develop ecotourism in a humanistic direction, because this is an area with many famous historical relics such as Quan Lan Communal House, Quan Lan Pagoda, Temple worshiping the hero Tran Khanh Du, ... along with local festivals held annually such as the wind praying ceremony (March 15), Quan Lan festival (June 10-19); due to its location near the port and long exploitation time, the beaches in Quan Lan commune (especially Quan Lan beach) are no longer hygienic and clean to ensure the needs of tourists coming to relax and swim; this is also an area with many beautiful landscapes such as Got Beo wind pass, Ong Phong head, Voi Voi cave, but the ability to access these places is still very limited (dirt hill road, lots of gravel and rocks), especially during rainy and windy times; In addition, other natural resources such as mangrove forests and sea worms have not been really exploited for tourism purposes and ecotourism development. On the contrary, Minh Chau commune has more advantages in developing ecotourism in the direction of natural tourism, this is an area with diverse ecosystems such as at Rua De Beach, Bai Tu Long National Park Conservation Center...; Minh Chau beach is highly appreciated for its natural beauty and cleanliness, ranked in the top ten most beautiful beaches in Vietnam; Minh Chau commune is also home to Tram forest with a large area and a purity of up to 90%, suitable for building bridges through the forest (a very effective type of natural ecotourism currently applied by many countries) for tourists to sightsee, as well as for the purpose of studying and researching. Figure 3.1: Thenmala Forest Bridge (India) Source: https://www.thenmalaecotourism.com/(August 21, 2019) 3.2.2. Using SWOT matrix to evaluate Quan Lan island tourism General assessment of current tourism activities of Quan Lan island is shown through the following SWOT matrix: Table 3.5: SWOT matrix evaluating tourism activities on Quan Lan island Internal agent Strengths- There is a lot of potential for tourism development, especially natural ecotourism and humanistic ecotourism.- The unskilled labor force is relatively abundant.- resource environmentunpolluted, still Weaknesses- Poorly developed infrastructure, especially traffic routes to tourist destinations on the island.- The team of professional staff is still weak.- Tourism products in general quite wild, originalintact general and DLST in particularalone is monotonous. External agents Opportunity- Tourism is a key industry in the socio-economic development strategy of the province and Van Don economic zone.- Quan Lan was selected as a pilot area for eco-tourism development within the framework of the green growth project between Quang Ninh province and the Japanese organization JICA.- The flow of tourists and especially ecotourism in the world tends toincreasing Challenge- Weather and climate change abnormally.- Competition in tourism products is increasingly fierce, especially with other localities in the province such as Ha Long, Mong Cai...- Awareness of tourists, especially domestic tourists, about ecotourism and nature conservation is not high. Through summary analysis using SWOT matrix we see that: To exploit strengths and take advantage of opportunities, it is necessary to: - Diversify products and service types (build more tourism routes aimed at specific needs of tourists: experiential tourism immersed in nature, spiritual cultural tourism...) - Effective exploitation of resources and differentiated products (natural resources and human resources) div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: #0D0D0D; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -3pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Symbol, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:Wingdings; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:Cambria, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: #212121; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex
-
Research on assessing tourism potential with forest products in Ba Vi National Park, Ba Vi district, Hanoi city - 1
-
Solutions for tourism development in Tien Lang - 10 zt2i3t4l5ee zt2a3gstourism, tourism development zt2a3ge zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts - District People's Committees and authorities of communes with tourist attractions should support, promote, and provide necessary information to people, helping them improve their knowledge about tourism. Raise tourism awareness for local people. * * * Due to limited knowledge and research time, the thesis inevitably has shortcomings. Therefore, I look forward to receiving guidance from teachers, experts as well as your comments to make the thesis more complete. Chapter III Conclusion Through the issues presented in Chapter II, we can come to some conclusions: Based on the strengths of available tourism resources, the types of tourism in Tien Lang that need to be promoted in the coming time are sightseeing and resort tourism, discovery tourism, weekend tourism. To improve the quality and diversify tourism products, Tien Lang district needs to combine with local cultural tourism resources, at the same time combine with surrounding areas, build rich tourism products. The strengths of Tien Lang tourism are eco-tourism and cultural tourism, so developing Tien Lang tourism must always go hand in hand with restoring and preserving types of cultural tourism resources. Some necessary measures to support and improve the efficiency of exploiting tourism resources in Tien Lang are: strengthening the construction of technical facilities and labor force serving tourism, actively promoting and advertising tourism, and expanding forms of capital mobilization for tourism development. CONCLUDE I Conclusion 1. Based on the results achieved within the framework of the thesis's needs, some basic conclusions can be drawn as follows: Tien Lang is a locality with great potential for tourism development. The relatively abundant cultural tourism resources and ecological tourism resources have great appeal to tourists. Based on this potential, Tien Lang can build a unique tourism industry that is competitive enough with other localities within Hai Phong city and neighboring areas. In recent years, the exploitation of the advantages of resources to develop tourism and build tourist routes in Tien Lang has not been commensurate with the available potential. In terms of quantity, many resource objects have not been brought into the purpose of tourism development. In terms of time, the regular service time has not been extended to attract more visitors. Infrastructure and technical facilities are still weak. The labor force is still thin and weak in terms of expertise. Tourism programs and routes have not been organized properly, the exploitation content is still monotonous, so it has not attracted many visitors. Although resources have not been mobilized much for tourism development, they are facing the risk of destruction and degradation. 2. Based on the results of investigation, analysis, synthesis, evaluation and selective absorption of research results of related topics, the thesis has proposed a number of necessary solutions to improve the efficiency of exploiting tourism resources in Tien Lang such as: promoting the restoration and conservation of tourism resources, focusing on investment and key exploitation of ecotourism resources, strengthening the construction of infrastructure and tourism workforce. Expanding forms of capital mobilization. In addition, the thesis has built a number of tourist routes of Hai Phong in which Tien Lang tourism resources play an important role. Exploiting Tien Lang tourism resources for tourism development is currently facing many difficulties. The above measures, if applied synchronously, will likely bring new prospects for the local tourism industry, contributing to making Tien Lang tourism an important economic sector in the district's economic structure. REFERENCES 1. Nhuan Ha, Trinh Minh Hien, Tran Phuong, Hai Phong - Historical and cultural relics, Hai Phong Publishing House, 1993 2. Hai Phong City History Council, Hai Phong Gazetteer, Hai Phong Publishing House, 1990. 3. Hai Phong City History Council, History of Tien Lang District Party Committee, Hai Phong Publishing House, 1990. 4. Hai Phong City History Council, University of Social Sciences and Humanities, VNU, Hai Phong Place Names Encyclopedia, Hai Phong Publishing House. 2001. 5. Law on Cultural Heritage and documents guiding its implementation, National Political Publishing House, Hanoi, 2003. 6. Tran Duc Thanh, Lecture on Tourism Geography, Faculty of Tourism, University of Social Sciences and Humanities, VNU, 2006 7. Hai Phong Center for Social Sciences and Humanities, Some typical cultural heritages of Hai Phong, Hai Phong Publishing House, 2001 8. Nguyen Ngoc Thao (editor-in-chief, Tourism Geography, Hai Phong Publishing House, two volumes (2001-2002) 9. Nguyen Minh Tue and group of authors, Hai Phong Tourism Geography, Ho Chi Minh City Publishing House, 1997. 10. Nguyen Thanh Son, Hai Phong Tourism Territory Organization, Associate Doctoral Thesis in Geological Geography, Hanoi, 1996. 11. Decision No. 2033/QD – UB on detailed planning of Tien Lang town, Hai Phong city until 2020. 12. Department of Culture, Information, Hai Phong Museum, Hai Phong relics - National ranked scenic spot, Hai Phong Publishing House, 2005. 13. Tien Lang District People's Committee, Economic Development Planning - Culture - Society of Tien Lang district to 2010. 14.Website www.HaiPhong.gov.vn APPENDIX 1 List of national ranked monuments STT Name of the monument Number, year of decisiondetermine Location 1 Gam Temple 938 VH/QĐ04/08/1992 Cam Khe Village- Toan Thang commune 2 Doc Hau Temple 9381 VH/QĐ04/08/1992 Doc Hau Village –Toan Thang commune 3 Cuu Doi Communal House 3207 VH/QĐDecember 30, 1991 Zone II of townTien Lang 4 Ha Dai Temple 938 VH/QĐ04/08/1992 Ha Dai Village –Tien Thanh commune APPENDIX II STT Name of the monument Number, year of decision Location 1 Phu Ke Pagoda Temple 178/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005 Zone 1 - townTien Lang 2 Trung Lang Temple 178/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005 Zone 4 – townTien Lang 3 Bao Khanh Pagoda 1900/QD-UBAugust 24, 2006 Nam Tu Village -Kien Thiet commune 4 Bach Da Pagoda 1792/QD-UB11/11/2002 Hung Thang Commune 5 Ngoc Dong Temple 177/QD-UBNovember 27, 2005 Tien Thanh Commune 6 Tomb of Minister TSNhu Van Lan 2848/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2003 Nam Tu Village -Kien Thiet commune 7 Canh Son Stone Temple 2160/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2003 Van Doi Commune –Doan Lap 8 Meiji Temple 2259/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2002 Toan Thang Commune 9 Tien Doi Noi Temple 477/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2005 Doan Lap Commune 10 Tu Doi Temple 177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005 Doan Lap Commune 11 Duyen Lao Temple 177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005 Tien Minh Commune 12 Dinh Xuan Uc Pagoda 177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005 Bac Hung Commune 13 Chu Khe Pagoda 177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005 Hung Thang Commune 14 Dong Dinh 2848/QD-UBNovember 21, 2002 Vinh Quang Commune 15 President's Memorial HouseTon Duc Thang 177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005 NT Quy Cao Ha Dai Temple Ben Vua Temple Tien Lang hot spring div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 16pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 6pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 12pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex
-
Developing cultural tourism from the potential of ethnic minorities in Ninh Thuan province, the case of the Raglai ethnic group in Bac Ai district - 17
-
Criteria for Assessing the Sustainability of Tourism Activities
Source: Author's synthesis, 2017
ii. Evaluation from tourist survey
The results from the author's survey (Table 2.2) show that when evaluating the tourism resources of this destination, tourists believe that convenient geographical location plays the most important role. In addition, criteria such as landscape, climate, cleanliness, freshness of the environment and safety, political stability of the destination are also rated at a fairly good level or higher. This partly shows that tourism resources on the HLKTĐT are completely capable of attracting tourists. However, attention should be paid to the issue of preserving world cultural heritage, folk festivals during the exploitation process as well as factors affected by climate change.
Table 2.2. Tourists' evaluation of tourism resources on the HLKTĐT
Criteria
Rating level average 1 | Standard deviation | |
Scenery, attractions on the route | 3.92 | ,904 |
Favorable climate and weather | 3.71 | ,997 |
Convenient geographical location | 4.00 | ,795 |
Cleanliness and freshness of the environment | 3.92 | ,926 |
Safety and political stability of the destination | 3.87 | ,933 |
Source: Author's survey, 2017
2.1.3. Priority areas for tourism development
For many reasons analyzed above, tourism has become a priority economic sector for development along the route, helping to create jobs, reduce poverty, and create spillovers for the overall growth of the economy. Researching tourist destinations of the four countries along the corridor will create opportunities for tourism projects in localities to be implemented.
On January 30, 2010, the International Conference on Tourism Development Cooperation between the North Central provinces of Vietnam with Laos and Thailand took place in Hue City. At the conference, the three countries signed a memorandum of understanding with many important contents. With the goal of
1 On a scale of 1 to 5 with 1 being Very Poor and 5 being Very Good
To turn the East-West Economic Corridor into a branded land tourism route in Southeast Asia by 2015, the three countries will create the most favorable conditions for the flow of tourists.
Specifically, tourism products and services, tours and routes will be improved and renewed; a common strategy for sharing the tourist market and promoting tourism will be developed; joint venture contracts will be signed between travel agencies, transportation companies and service providers. In addition, the three countries will proactively cooperate bilaterally or multilaterally in exchanging information and experience, supporting the development and improvement of skilled human resources; and prioritizing the training of professional tour guides who are proficient in at least two languages: Vietnamese and Thai.
However, the major challenge that the countries participating in the East-West Economic Corridor face in developing road tourism along the entire route is the synchronous cooperation mechanism. In more than ten years of operation, the East-West Economic Corridor has not been overseen by an independent agency responsible for monitoring its development. This has led to challenges in the coordination of activities between different government agencies as well as with development partners, implementing projects on the corridor. Thus, during the formation and development of the East-West Economic Corridor, many conferences have been held but no specific cooperation mechanism has been proposed. It was not until May 2012 in Quang Tri that the first Vietnam - Laos - Thailand Deputy Foreign Ministers' Conference agreed to establish an annual, rotating dialogue mechanism among the three countries and hoped that Myanmar would participate in this mechanism in the future. If successfully implemented, this mechanism will open a new page for the Mekong Delta Economic Cooperation within the framework of cooperation between the four countries of Vietnam - Laos - Thailand - Myanmar to promote integration and economic, trade, investment, tourism and poverty reduction for countries in the Mekong River basin.
2.2. Current status of road tourism exploitation on the national highway
2.2.1. Road tourism infrastructure
The road traffic system is considered the backbone of the urban economic corridor, which will be formed first, followed by economic, trade, and tourism corridors.
1,450km on the HLKTĐT has formed a road traffic route (Figure 2.3):
The road traffic system on the HLKTĐT is conveniently connected with the following routes (Figure 2.3):
- Trans-Asian route from Europe through the Middle East, India to Burma.
- North-South Corridor China - Laos - Thailand.
- Route Vientiane – Bangkok, Bangkok – Chiang Mai.
- Route Hanoi – Da Nang – Ho Chi Minh City – Phnom Penh.
Figure 2.3. Road traffic system on the urban railway
Source: Montague Lord, 2009[63]
Tourists access the East-West Economic Corridor by road, air and water. Currently, this area has 2 international airports (Da Nang, Yangon airport at the beginning of Myanmar can be added), 4 domestic airports (Sukhonthai, Phitsanulok, Savanakhet, Hue), 6 main stations (Mawlamyine, Phitsanulok, Khon kaen, Dong Ha, Hue, Da Nang) and secondary stations. The survey results (Table 2.3) show that most tourists want to go to the East-West Economic Corridor by motorbike (25.1%). The next most popular means of transport are personal cars and self-driving cars (Caravan). Meanwhile, only 15.9% of tourists want to travel to the East-West Economic Corridor through tours.
Table 2.3. Means of transport that tourists want to use to get to HLKTĐT
Vehicle
Percentage of visitors who agree | |
Tour | 15.9% |
Caravan | 14.6% |
Private car | 18.3% |
Motorbike | 25.1% |
Source: Author's survey, 2017
Among the countries in the HLKTDT region, Thailand is the country with the most developed infrastructure, vehicles and road network. The road system passing through Thailand is invested synchronously, of good quality, and the average speed can reach 90-100 km/h. For Vietnam, Laos and Myanmar, the infrastructure is gradually being improved to suit the usage requirements (Table 2.4).
Table 2.4. Road traffic density of countries on the HLKTĐT route
In Burma
200 km | From Mawlamyine to Myawaddy via Eindu, 40 km of road and two large suspension bridges need to be upgraded. | |
In Thailand | 780 km | From Tak to Mukdahan via Phitsanulok, Khonkaen 45% is a 4 lane national highway Road, 70km of road needs to be upgraded |
In Laos | 210 km | From Savanakhet to Dansavanh, 2 lane highway Newly completed and in very good condition |
In Vietnam | 260 km | From Lao Bao to Da Nang passing through Hue, 1/2 is the road highway in good condition |
Source: Author's survey, 2015
With financial and technical support from ADB and Japan, major projects on the corridor, including the Hai Van Pass tunnel and Friendship Bridge 2 connecting Savanakhet of Laos with Mukdahan of Thailand, have been completed, contributing to many socio-economic changes in the region.
Thanks to the HLKTĐT, the bus travel time from the Vietnam - Laos border to Savanakhet province of Laos was reduced from 12 hours in 2001 to 4 hours in 2010. From Dong Ha to Lao Bao was reduced from 4 hours in 2001 to 2 hours in 2010. Time
Travel time from Tien Sa port (Da Nang) to the Vietnam - Laos border decreased from 6 hours in 2001 to 4 hours in 2010.
According to the results of the author's survey (Table 2.5), tourists and tourism businesses operating on the East-West Economic Corridor all have a fairly good assessment of the infrastructure of this destination. In particular, according to businesses, the means of transport at destinations on the route are rated the best (3.89 points), while road infrastructure is rated the worst (3.25 points), but is still above average. For tourists, the quality of internet service provision and the quality of electricity and water supply are rated good, while road infrastructure is still the worst rated criterion (3.64 points). Thereby, it can be seen that, to develop road tourism on the East-West Economic Corridor, road infrastructure is the criterion that needs to be prioritized for improvement in the coming time.
Table 2.5. Tourist and business assessments of infrastructure on the East-West Economic Corridor
Criteria
Tourist | Travel business | |||
Rating level medium | Deviation standard | Rating level medium | Deviation standard | |
Transport infrastructure road | 3.64 | ,927 | 3.25 | ,645 |
Infrastructure and airport services | 3.83 | ,836 | 3.64 | ,678 |
Infrastructure and Port services | 3.96 | ,868 | 3.75 | ,585 |
Means of transport transfer at destination | 3.88 | ,866 | 3.89 | ,567 |
Supply quality Internet service application | 3.99 | ,918 | 3.71 | ,535 |
Supply quality electricity and water supply | 4.05 | ,776 | 3.71 | ,713 |
Source: Author's survey, 2017
2.2.2. Road tourism products and services
2.2.2.1. Travel
International and domestic travel companies tend to increase quite rapidly and play an increasingly important role in organizing international Inbound programs. Since 2004, the Thai Ambassador to Vietnam, Mr. Krit Kraichitti, has personally realized the possibility of tourism cooperation between the four countries by attracting many travel companies to quickly have a strong voice from the business side to submit to the Government such as abolishing entry visas between Laos and Vietnam, between Laos and Thailand. Thai travel companies have outlined the vision for their customers: Morning drinking Mukdahan coffee (Thailand), lunch eating Savannakhet (Laos) and evening swimming at Non Nuoc beach (Da Nang). Both China and Japan have also begun to exploit the HLKTĐT.
Up to now, there have been many travel companies exploiting and benefiting from the source of visitors to the E-tourism route, mainly companies in the Isan region, Bangkok, Chiang Mai (Thailand), Savanakhet, Champasak (Laos), Quang Tri, Thua Thien Hue, Da Nang (Vietnam). Many groups of companies have been formed to exploit the source of visitors by road, the source of caravan visitors, the Vietnamese side even established a Club of businesses welcoming Thai visitors by road under the Vietnam Tourism Association, clearly stipulating that only companies participating in this Club are qualified to welcome Thai visitors at the land border gates. Travel companies have played a very important role in orienting, promoting the source of visitors, creating products, standardizing the service supply system... on the E-tourism route.
2.2.2.2. Products
Due to the characteristics of the transport infrastructure, road tourism is the most popular on the route. Railways and waterways are almost non-existent or not yet exploited, only railways can be used to connect tourist centers such as: Yangon, Bangkok, Chiang Mai, Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh City... to localities such as: Mawlamyine, Sukhothai, Phitsanulok, Khon Kaen, Quang Tri, Hue, Da Nang. Air routes mainly rely on central airports such as Rang Gun, Chiang Mai, Bangkok, Vientiane, Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh City, Da Nang... The products
Road tourism products are still quite monotonous, mainly focusing on accommodation in some centers such as Mukdahan, Savanakhet, Hue, Da Nang..., other localities only pass by, the average stay on the route is very short; the main tourism products are: Cultural history, ecology and beach vacation, in 3 forms: Caravan (self-driving), cars of travel companies and public cars.
The products that travel companies sell as a package on HLKTĐT, HLKTĐT + some nearby destinations for both company cars and self-driving cars include:
Mukdahan - Savanakhet - Dong Ha - Hue - Da Nang - Hoi An Mukdahan - Savanakhet - Quang Binh - Hue - Da Nang Hoi An
Mukdahan – Savanakhet - Dong Ha – Thanh Hoa – Hanoi – Ha Long – Vinh Da Nang – Hue - Dong Ha – Savanakhet – Nakhon Phanom – Vientiane Da Nang – Hue - Dong Ha – Savanakhet – Mukdahan – Bangkok – Pattaya Da Nang – Hue - Dong Ha – Savanakhet – Mukdahan – Chiang Mai
Myanmar has not yet connected the products of travel companies.
The route has not yet formed tourism products with a common theme for the entire route. Vietnam already has a very attractive Central Heritage Road, but it has not yet expanded to Laos, Thailand, and Myanmar.
Products for self-driving families, individual travelers traveling by motorbike, bus, high-quality car... are mainly formed at the destination including: Hotels/motels, restaurants, sightseeing spots, entertainment spots, shopping... These products on the route are mainly at the basic level, except for established tourist centers such as Sukhothai, Khon Kaen, Hue, Da Nang.
The entertainment and shopping products on the route are still very sketchy, only stopping at the dinosaur park (Mukdahan, Savanakhet), national park (Mawlamyine, Phitsanulok, Phechabun, Thua Thien Hue, Da Nang), casino (Savanakhet, Da Nang), beer pubs, bars, karaoke, dance clubs, massage parlors, local markets, supermarkets..., there are no in-depth entertainment and shopping services that really attract and retain tourists such as: Water parks, night markets, walking streets, art performances, street shows, shopping areas.