The Role of the State in Providing Services to Support the Development of SMEs


volunteer to serve as partners of the Small Business Administration to assist in the performance of its duties. The Council's recommendations are purely advisory in nature and its members are required to communicate them directly to officials of the Small Business Administration. The Japan SME Policy Council is composed of representatives of business associations (the Japan Chamber of Commerce and Industry, the National Federation of Small Business Associations, local branches of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry, and other business associations); government support organizations (the Japan Small Business Finance Corporation, the Small Business Guarantee Corporation, the Japan Small Business Support Corporation); university professors, and business owners.

1.4.4.2. About the system of implementing support for SMEs


In developed countries, governments have generally avoided the establishment of large-scale public institutions to support SMEs. Most government support is provided through private organizations, business associations, consulting organizations, universities or research institutes. The role of the government is often focused on providing resources and promoting the activities of support organizations rather than being the direct implementer or provider of SME support services. In contrast, in some developing countries such as India, the government has established several large-scale, specialized organizations to directly implement SME support programs.

In the 70s and 80s, international organizations such as UNDP, UNIDO, ILO supported developing countries such as Egypt, Sri Lanka, Singapore, Thailand, etc. to pursue the “Indian model” as presented above in building state agencies focused on developing and implementing large-scale SME support programs nationwide. However, the effectiveness of this model did not achieve the desired results in terms of: impact, reach to businesses and effectiveness of support programs. Based on the above analysis, many opinions believe that state agencies should abandon the function of providing direct services, focusing mainly on the tasks of promoting, supporting, monitoring and managing the quality of services. However, opinions on the method of supporting businesses among state agencies are also very different.


The failures of the old approach led many governments in the late 20th century to conclude that an effective support system could not be achieved by the efforts of state-owned organizations alone. An effective support system requires close cooperation of resources from all organizations, not only from the private sector, business associations, industrial chambers of commerce; technical centers, universities, research institutes and even the efforts of large enterprises. This approach is seen in most developed countries (UK, USA, Germany ...) and is now also popular and successful in many Asian countries such as Korea, Japan, Taiwan ... Obviously, this approach supports more SMEs, with more abundant resources. At the same time, support activities are implemented on a market basis (not subsidy) and therefore, support will be more sustainable. In many countries, the state only plays the role of "midwife" with initial investment activities (incubator models, establishment of centers, funds) and then gradually transfers them to the private sector. Experience shows that experts and staff of private organizations often have a lot of business experience and are often capable of providing practical and effective support to SMEs. Transferring some support services to private organizations is the basis for dividing responsibilities and effective cooperation between the private sector and the government in jointly supporting small businesses. The gradual transfer of the function of implementing support for SMEs to the private sector helps to limit the bureaucracy of a state organization, while reducing the burden on local authorities and increasing the effectiveness of support in terms of costs and results. A typical example of this approach is the public-private partnership model in Germany (PPP – public private partnership) [42. p.21], in which the state only invests in infrastructure for support facilities and does not participate in management. The management and operation of those SME support facilities are carried out by representative organizations of the private sector.

1.4.4.3. The role of the State in providing services to support the development of SMEs


In developing or transition countries, there is still a tendency for the state (both central and local) to make efforts to create a number of service providers for enterprises – that is, state-owned establishments that provide services to enterprises. These establishments mostly operate under a subsidized mechanism, run by public companies.


State management and operation. Operating financial resources are often taken from the state budget or funding from foreign donors. There is a view that these facilities can hardly operate effectively for various reasons. In many countries, the model of state service centers to serve SMEs after a number of years of operation has been dissolved due to their inability to survive on their own or privatized in the hope of operating more effectively. In some developing countries, there is a view that the state needs to play an active role in the early stages of development. In supporting SMEs, this implies that the state must create its own support service facilities to support local businesses to enhance their competitiveness, helping businesses survive and develop in a context of regionalization and globalization that is increasingly becoming a common development trend. This view seems to ignore all calculations about the effectiveness of business support, and what those who follow this view often pursue is national prestige in the international market: people try to support businesses so that they can produce and manufacture products that have “value” from the government’s point of view, regardless of pure economic efficiency. When those products are successfully produced, meaning that the industry has a foothold in the domestic market, then people begin to support them to expand to regional and world markets. An objective factor supporting this view is the underdevelopment of private service providers in developing countries. Many opinions say that business development services are difficult work, requiring high qualifications. Meanwhile, in a developing economy, such high qualifications are very limited. That is, the supply side of the market for these services is very limited. That is why it is believed that the state needs to create service providers to serve businesses.

In contrast to the deep interventionist view of developing country governments, most market economists believe that in intervening in the business development service market, the state (government) should only play the role of a facilitator. That is, the government should only stop at building capacity for private suppliers instead of establishing state-owned supply organizations with bureaucrats and non-market-based operations of those organizations.


CONCLUSION OF CHAPTER 1

The evolution of theoretical schools on the role of the State in the market economy has been continuous for more than two centuries. Lessons from the past have helped economists today affirm that a modern market economy must be a mixed economy, in which the self-regulating mechanism of the market and the active regulation of the State are two factors that need to be maintained and strengthened at reasonable levels in the practical conditions of each economy.

Despite its important roles in the socio-economic development of each country, such as creating many jobs; contributing to the transformation of the economic structure towards dynamism and efficiency; contributing significantly to economic growth; contributing to the improvement of the market economy institution, the SME sector always faces serious difficulties and limitations such as lack of capital; weak management skills, unskilled labor force; outdated technology; the ability to access markets and business connections often encounter many difficulties... In order for SMEs to best promote their contributions to the economy and effectively participate in solving social problems, the experience of other countries has shown that the State needs to have appropriate intervention to support the development of this important business sector through (i) Developing a favorable business environment for enterprises; (ii) Performing well the function of structural adjustment, creating many business opportunities and investment motivation for SMEs; (iii) Implement programs to support SMEs to overcome internal difficulties to develop and (iv) Build a system of organizations and agencies to support SMEs suitable to the conditions of each country.


CHAPTER 2

CURRENT STATE OF THE ROLE OF THE STATE IN DEVELOPING SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES IN VIETNAM


2.1. CURRENT STATE OF SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT IN VIETNAM

2.1.1. Development process of Vietnam's SME sector


2.1.1.1. SME sector before innovation


In the highly centralized planned economy of our country before 1989, in terms of capital scale, most enterprises existed on a small scale, but in terms of labor, most were considered large-scale enterprises. All legal regulations, policy mechanisms, and economic structures were built with the aim of pursuing a state-planned economy in the direction of industrialization focusing on large-scale production. Therefore, economic policies at that time all hindered the emergence and development of small and medium-sized private enterprises. At that time, only one type of SME was recognized by law, which was cooperatives. Non-state-owned businesses had very few opportunities to develop, not only because of the laws and policies of the state, but also because the popular perception of society was a huge barrier to this economic sector.

In terms of labor division, the human resource training policy mainly oriented towards providing human resources for state administrative agencies and large-scale state-owned enterprises is also an important reason limiting the birth and development of SMEs. The vast majority of excellent students strive to work in state agencies without any desire to build their own business or work for a private enterprise.

In terms of social attitudes, in the eyes of government officials as well as the people, small business people are always considered a backward group of people with a tendency to be private traders, that is, a type of harmful object to society that needs to be eliminated.


2.1.1.2. Current status of SMEs from after renovation to 2000


Based on a more correct and complete understanding of socialism and the path to socialism in Vietnam, the 6th Party Congress in December 1986 set out a comprehensive national renovation policy to more effectively carry out the construction of socialism. The Congress put forward new concepts on the path and methods of building socialism in the transitional period, on the economic structure, acknowledged the objective existence of commodity production and the market, strongly criticized the centralized, bureaucratic, subsidized mechanism and affirmed a complete shift to business accounting. The Party Congress advocated the development of a multi-sector economy with appropriate business forms; attaching importance to combining individual, collective and social interests. The 6th Central Conference of the 6th Session in March 1989 took this a step further, putting forward the viewpoint of developing a planned commodity economy with many components moving towards socialism, considering the multi-component economic policy as an issue of long-term strategic significance, with the law of moving from small-scale production to socialism.

In 1987, the first Law on Foreign Investment in Vietnam was issued, followed by a series of legal documents directly regulating the business activities of enterprises such as: Law on Companies, Law on Private Enterprises 1990,... But the most important is the 1992 Constitution, this is the constitution that marks the period of strong and comprehensive innovation of our country. With the affirmation: "The State develops a multi-sector commodity economy, following the market mechanism, with State management, following the socialist orientation... promoting all potentials of economic sectors: national economy, individual economy, State capitalist economy, private economy... citizens have the right to freely do business according to the law..." [24], the 1992 Constitution laid the basis and legal foundation for the birth of the current business law system. One of the core contents of the legal system on enterprises in the renovation period is business liberalization. In addition to the birth of the Law on Enterprises (1990), the Law on Private Enterprises (1990), the Law on Domestic Investment Promotion (1994), the sub-law documents regulating and guiding the implementation of the fields of tax, finance, credit, land, labor, training, etc. were issued together, creating a favorable environment for economic organizations to invest in business. Along with the "unleashing" of the private economic sector, the more open and transparent legal system


on enterprises has contributed to a strong growth in the number of private enterprises, the vast majority of which are SMEs. From an economy with two main entities, state-owned enterprises and cooperatives, a business sector previously mainly contributed by about 12,000 state-owned enterprises, after more than a decade has become a diverse business community, existing under many different legal forms. By the end of 1999, in addition to 3,700 state-owned enterprises, over 4,200 enterprises with foreign investment capital, there was also a growing non-state business community with about 35,000 enterprises including: cooperatives, private enterprises, limited liability companies, partnerships and joint stock companies with a diverse mix of private, state, foreign and collective ownership forms ( Table 2.1 ).

Table 2.1: Number of SMEs by ownership form as of December 31, 1999



Total

Large enterprise

SMEs

% of SMEs in total

DN

State-owned enterprise

5759

3,263

2,496

43.3

Non-state enterprise

35004

1,571

33,433

95.5

Enterprises with foreign investment capital

1525

1,149

376

24.6%

Maybe you are interested!

The Role of the State in Providing Services to Support the Development of SMEs

Source: General Statistics Office, [27].


It can be said that in the 90s of the last century, the SME sector was formed and had its first steps of development. Although the State did not have specific policies and support measures for this business sector, the SME sector has benefited from the policy of opening the economy and policies to encourage the development of a multi-sector economy of the Party and the State.

2.1.1.3. Development process of the SME sector from 2000 to present


The biggest change in the SME sector since 2000 has been the significant and stable increase in the number of newly registered SMEs in Vietnam. From 2001 to the end of 2010, the country had nearly 510 thousand newly established enterprises, of which 98% were SMEs with a registered capital of 1,533 trillion VND [10]. In 2001, on average, 964 people had one established enterprise, but by 2010, it was estimated that every 176 people had one registered enterprise. However, compared to the socio-economic development goals and the goals of the economies


APEC economies strive to achieve 1 enterprise per 20 people, and compared to other countries in the region, this rate is still very low.

Table 2.2: Some average indicators of Vietnamese enterprises

(as of year end)



Year


2001


2002


2003


2004


2005


2006


2007


2008

1. Enterprises of all sectors

Average number of employees

76

74

72

63

55

51

47

40

Average capital (billion VND)

24

23

24

24

24

26

31

31

Net revenue/1 labor (million VND)

238

260

281

303

356

409

483

651

Return on capital (%)

3.8

4.3

4.5

4.9

4.4

4.9

4.7

3.3

Return on Sales (%)

5.0

5.1

5.4

6.0

5.2

6.1

6.2

4.0

2. State-owned enterprises

Average number of employees

395

421

467

490

499

513

505

497

Average capital (billion VND)

153

167

210

265

354

475

616

768

Net revenue/1 labor (million VND)

228

275

300

323

421

525

640

825

Return on capital (%)

2.5

2.9

2.8

3.2

3.2

3.5

3.6

2.8

Return on Sales (%)

4.2

4.2

4.2

5.3

5.4

6.2

6.8

5.1


3. Non-state enterprises

Average number of employees

30

31

32

29

28

27

27

24

Average capital (billion VND)

4

4

5

6

7

8

12

14

Net revenue/1 labor (million VND)

206

214

237

260

289

339

427

634

Return on capital (%)

2.3

2.3

2.1

1.6

1.5

2.0

2.6

1.3

Return on Sales (%)

1.3

1.5

1.5

1.3

1.2

1.7

2.8

1.2


4. Foreign invested enterprises

Average number of employees

243

299

326

331

330

343

340

325

Average capital (billion VND)

133

134

140

142

143

155

172

193

Net revenue/1 labor (million VND)

368

327

341

365

411

420

450

543

Return on capital (%)

8.7

10.0

11.6

13.0

11.3

13.2

11.7

10

Return on Sales (%)

13.0

13.6

14.6

15.4

11.8

14.2

13

11

Source : General Statistics Office, [28].


According to the survey data on the business situation in 2005-2007 of the General Statistics Office, the non-state enterprise sector (excluding business households), mainly small and medium enterprises, is still the fastest growing sector, with labor accounting for 50.13%, capital accounting for 28.92%, revenue accounting for 22.07%, and profit accounting for 10.6%.

Comment


Agree Privacy Policy *