Summary of Cronbach'S Alpha Reliability Coefficients of the Scales

CV1


Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Disagree

123

28.2

28.2

28.2


Confused

23

5.3

5.3

33.5


Agree

219

50.2

50.2

83.7


Totally agree

71

16.3

16.3

100.0


Total

436

100.0

100.0


Maybe you are interested!

Summary of CronbachS Alpha Reliability Coefficients of the Scales


CV2


Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent


Valid

Disagree


79


18.1


18.1


18.1


Confused


17


3.9


3.9


22.0


Agree


178


40.8


40.8


62.8


Totally agree


162


37.2


37.2


100.0


Total


436


100.0


100.0



CV3


Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Disagree


104

23.9

23.9

23.9


Confused


14

3.2

3.2

27.1


Agree


217

49.8

49.8

76.8


Totally agree


101

23.2

23.2

100.0


Total


436

100.0

100.0



CV4


Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Disagree

15

3.4

3.4

3.4


Confused

1

.2

.2

3.7


Agree

333

76.4

76.4

80.0


Totally agree

87

20.0

20.0

100.0


Total

436

100.0

100.0



CV5


Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Disagree

115

26.4

26.4

26.4


Confused

25

5.7

5.7

32.1


Agree

224

51.4

51.4

83.5


Totally agree

72

16.5

16.5

100.0


Total

436

100.0

100.0


CT1


Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Disagree

13

3.0

3.0

3.0


Confused

21

4.8

4.8

7.8


Agree

227

52.1

52.1

59.9


Totally agree

175

40.1

40.1

100.0


Total

436

100.0

100.0



CT2


Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Disagree

12

2.8

2.8

2.8


Confused

43

9.9

9.9

12.6


Agree

209

47.9

47.9

60.6


Totally agree

172

39.4

39.4

100.0


Total

436

100.0

100.0



CT3


Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Disagree

9

2.1

2.1

2.1


Confused

22

5.0

5.0

7.1


Agree

218

50.0

50.0

57.1


Totally agree

187

42.9

42.9

100.0


Total

436

100.0

100.0



CT4


Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Disagree

7

1.6

1.6

1.6


Confused

27

6.2

6.2

7.8


Agree

221

50.7

50.7

58.5


Totally agree

181

41.5

41.5

100.0


Total

436

100.0

100.0



KH1


Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Strongly disagree

1

.2

.2

.2


Disagree

108

24.8

24.8

25.0


Confused

15

3.4

3.4

28.4


Agree

241

55.3

55.3

83.7


Totally agree

71

16.3

16.3

100.0


Total

436

100.0

100.0



KH2


Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Disagree

85

19.5

19.5

19.5


Confused

22

5.0

5.0

24.5


Agree

250

57.3

57.3

81.9


Totally agree

79

18.1

18.1

100.0


Total

436

100.0

100.0



KH3


Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Disagree

23

5.3

5.3

5.3


Confused

15

3.4

3.4

8.7


Agree

138

31.7

31.7

40.4


Totally agree

260

59.6

59.6

100.0


Total

436

100.0

100.0



KH4


Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Disagree

87

20.0

20.0

20.0


Confused

19

4.4

4.4

24.3


Agree

202

46.3

46.3

70.6


Totally agree

128

29.4

29.4

100.0


Total

436

100.0

100.0


HN1


Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Disagree

10

2.3

2.3

2.3


Confused

38

8.7

8.7

11.0


Agree

178

40.8

40.8

51.8


Totally agree

210

48.2

48.2

100.0


Total

436

100.0

100.0



HN2


Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Disagree

83

19.0

19.0

19.0


Confused

14

3.2

3.2

22.2


Agree

196

45.0

45.0

67.2


Totally agree

143

32.8

32.8

100.0


Total

436

100.0

100.0



HN3


Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Disagree

72

16.5

16.5

16.5


Confused

8

1.8

1.8

18.3


Agree

165

37.8

37.8

56.2


Totally agree

191

43.8

43.8

100.0


Total

436

100.0

100.0



HN4


Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Disagree

105

24.1

24.1

24.1


Confused

7

1.6

1.6

25.7


Agree

209

47.9

47.9

73.6


Totally agree

115

26.4

26.4

100.0


Total

436

100.0

100.0


APPENDIX 7

RESULTS OF QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH ON FACTORS AFFECTING CORPORATE CULTURE OF COMMERCIAL BANKS IN QUANG NGAI PROVINCE


7A. GROUP OF STATE-OWNED COMMERCIAL BANKS OF QUANG NGAI PROVINCE


Average Value Statistics



N


Minimum


Maximum


Mean

Std.

Deviation

Staff

280

2.00

5.00

4.3558

.73409

CV

280

2.00

5.00

3.7693

.81758

CT

280

2.00

5.00

4.3976

.55720

KH

280

2.00

5.00

3.9732

.75235

HN

280

2.00

5.00

3.8821

.91624

Valid N (listwise)

280






1. RELIABILITY TESTING – CRONBACH'S ALPHA


Table 1.1

TT

Symbol

Criteria

Correlation coefficient

Cronbach's Alpha coefficient if variable is excluded

Bank Leadership (LD) Cronbach's Alpha = 0.927

1

LD1

Culturally relevant decisions

all depend on leadership

.693

.948

2

LD2

Bank leadership style

have its own characteristics

.894

.883

3

LD3

Qualified bank leaders

highly specialized

.890

.884

4

LD4

Bank leaders pay great attention

develop office culture values

.853

.898

Bank employee (NV) Cronbach's Alpha = 0.768

5

NV1

Appropriate professional qualifications

job requirements

.835

.613

6

NV2

Young bank staff

medium, dynamic

.757

.645

7

NV3

The staff creates the image

Bank brand

.785

.632

8

NV4

Cooperative and service attitude

happy, enthusiastic customers

.471

.753

9

NV5

Always be given the opportunity to improve

professional level

.073

.898

10

CV1

Sales targets apply by location

job

.860

.825

11

CV2

Time to complete work per day

the shorter

.600

.890

12

CV3

Sensitivity in manufacturing business

high credit

.841

.830

13

CV4

Strict working process, requirements

absolute accuracy

.548

.900

14

CV5

Working atmosphere at the bank

sharing, cooperation

.831

.833

Competitive Environment (CT) Cronbach's Alpha = 0.763

15

CT1

Regional competitors

more and more

.760

.601

16

CT2

New technology is constantly being introduced.

update in bank

.758

.590

17

CT3

Product catalog becomes more and more

more diverse, rich

.789

.579

18

CT4

Customer attraction and market expansion strategy

school of focus

.093

.933

Customer (KH) Cronbach's Alpha = 0.795

19

KH1

Customers' increasing understanding of

credit products

.499

.800

20

KH2

Customer confidence in credit products

use is decreasing

.781

.653

21

KH3

Customers demand to be served wholeheartedly.

more love

.411

.826

22

KH4

Customers demand a level of commitment

higher from bank

.770

.653

Integration process (HN) Cronbach's Alpha = 0.665

21

HN1

More and more models appear

foreign bank image

.084

.774

22

HN2

Banks learn and apply these

typical model

.580

.499

23

HN3

The bank actively accepts the prices.

new cultural values

.627

.459

24

HN4

Multicultural, stimulating working environment

love creativity

.517

.546

Corporate Culture (VH) Cronbach's Alpha = 0.791

25

VH1

Architectural features of the workplace

design according to common model

.417

.782

26

VH2

The external symbols represent

high brand recognition

.448

.776

Job characteristics (CV) Cronbach's Alpha = 0.885

VH3

Banks have a system of regulations and

clear standards of conduct

.401

.783

28

VH4

Rituals, ceremonies, events and festivals

meetings are held regularly

.449

.776

29

VH5

Business philosophy, mission and vision

look at the strategy publicly

.690

.726

30

VH6

Historical values ​​and cultural traditions

culture is honored

.580

.752

31

VH7

Employees have positive attitudes and enthusiasm

believe in the development of banking

.640

.738

27


Table 1.2. Summary of Cronbach's Alpha reliability coefficients of the scales



STT

Scale

Number of indicators

Cronbach's Alpha coefficient

1

Bank leader

4

0.927

2

Bank employee

4

0.898

3

Job Characteristics

5

0.885

4

Competitive environment

3

0.933

5

Client

4

0.795

6

Integration process

3

0.774

7

Corporate culture

7

0.791

Total

30



2. FACTOR ANALYSIS - EFA


2.1. KMO and Bartlett test results

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy.

.771

Bartlett's Test of Sphericity

Approx. Chi-Square

5988.381


df

253


Sig.

.000

Source: Author's calculation results and SPSS software


2.2. Total Variance Explained



Component


Initial Eigenvalues

Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings

Rotation Sums of Squared Loadings


Total

% of

Variance

cumulative

%


Total

% of

Variance

cumulative

e %


Total

% of

Variance

cumulative

e %

1

6,946

30,202

30,202

6,946

30,202

30,202

6,092

26,485

26,485

2

3.341

14,525

44,727

3.341

14,525

44,727

3,597

15,641

42,127

3

2,544

11,059

55,786

2,544

11,059

55,786

2,709

11,779

53,906

4

2,354

10,233

66,019

2,354

10,233

66,019

2,523

10,971

64,877

5

1,807

7,857

73,876

1,807

7,857

73,876

2,070

8,999

73,876

6

.798

3,471

77,347







7

.776

3,374

80,721







8

.697

3,029

83,750







9

.580

2,523

86,273







10

.554

2,410

88,683







11

.468

2,034

90,717







12

.426

1,851

92,568







13

.343

1,493

94,061







14

.272

1,183

95,244







15

.244

1,062

96,306







16

.202

.878

97,184







17

.162

.705

97,889







18

.141

.614

98,503







19

.118

.514

99,016







20

.107

.466

99,482







21

.070

.303

99,785







22

.040

.174

99,959







23

.009

.041

100,000







Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

Comment


Agree Privacy Policy *