tourism information sector; investment and product development as well as promotion of local products; tourism training and development.

(Source: Data from the General Statistics Office of Vietnam processed by Stata)
Maybe you are interested!
-
Solutions for tourism development in Tien Lang - 10
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism, tourism development
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
- District People's Committees and authorities of communes with tourist attractions should support, promote, and provide necessary information to people, helping them improve their knowledge about tourism. Raise tourism awareness for local people.
*
* *
Due to limited knowledge and research time, the thesis inevitably has shortcomings. Therefore, I look forward to receiving guidance from teachers, experts as well as your comments to make the thesis more complete.
Chapter III Conclusion
Through the issues presented in Chapter II, we can come to some conclusions:
Based on the strengths of available tourism resources, the types of tourism in Tien Lang that need to be promoted in the coming time are sightseeing and resort tourism, discovery tourism, weekend tourism. To improve the quality and diversify tourism products, Tien Lang district needs to combine with local cultural tourism resources, at the same time combine with surrounding areas, build rich tourism products. The strengths of Tien Lang tourism are eco-tourism and cultural tourism, so developing Tien Lang tourism must always go hand in hand with restoring and preserving types of cultural tourism resources. Some necessary measures to support and improve the efficiency of exploiting tourism resources in Tien Lang are: strengthening the construction of technical facilities and labor force serving tourism, actively promoting and advertising tourism, and expanding forms of capital mobilization for tourism development.
CONCLUDE
I Conclusion
1. Based on the results achieved within the framework of the thesis's needs, some basic conclusions can be drawn as follows:
Tien Lang is a locality with great potential for tourism development. The relatively abundant cultural tourism resources and ecological tourism resources have great appeal to tourists. Based on this potential, Tien Lang can build a unique tourism industry that is competitive enough with other localities within Hai Phong city and neighboring areas.
In recent years, the exploitation of the advantages of resources to develop tourism and build tourist routes in Tien Lang has not been commensurate with the available potential. In terms of quantity, many resource objects have not been brought into the purpose of tourism development. In terms of time, the regular service time has not been extended to attract more visitors. Infrastructure and technical facilities are still weak. The labor force is still thin and weak in terms of expertise. Tourism programs and routes have not been organized properly, the exploitation content is still monotonous, so it has not attracted many visitors. Although resources have not been mobilized much for tourism development, they are facing the risk of destruction and degradation.
2. Based on the results of investigation, analysis, synthesis, evaluation and selective absorption of research results of related topics, the thesis has proposed a number of necessary solutions to improve the efficiency of exploiting tourism resources in Tien Lang such as: promoting the restoration and conservation of tourism resources, focusing on investment and key exploitation of ecotourism resources, strengthening the construction of infrastructure and tourism workforce. Expanding forms of capital mobilization. In addition, the thesis has built a number of tourist routes of Hai Phong in which Tien Lang tourism resources play an important role.
Exploiting Tien Lang tourism resources for tourism development is currently facing many difficulties. The above measures, if applied synchronously, will likely bring new prospects for the local tourism industry, contributing to making Tien Lang tourism an important economic sector in the district's economic structure.
REFERENCES
1. Nhuan Ha, Trinh Minh Hien, Tran Phuong, Hai Phong - Historical and cultural relics, Hai Phong Publishing House, 1993
2. Hai Phong City History Council, Hai Phong Gazetteer, Hai Phong Publishing House, 1990.
3. Hai Phong City History Council, History of Tien Lang District Party Committee, Hai Phong Publishing House, 1990.
4. Hai Phong City History Council, University of Social Sciences and Humanities, VNU, Hai Phong Place Names Encyclopedia, Hai Phong Publishing House. 2001.
5. Law on Cultural Heritage and documents guiding its implementation, National Political Publishing House, Hanoi, 2003.
6. Tran Duc Thanh, Lecture on Tourism Geography, Faculty of Tourism, University of Social Sciences and Humanities, VNU, 2006
7. Hai Phong Center for Social Sciences and Humanities, Some typical cultural heritages of Hai Phong, Hai Phong Publishing House, 2001
8. Nguyen Ngoc Thao (editor-in-chief, Tourism Geography, Hai Phong Publishing House, two volumes (2001-2002)
9. Nguyen Minh Tue and group of authors, Hai Phong Tourism Geography, Ho Chi Minh City Publishing House, 1997.
10. Nguyen Thanh Son, Hai Phong Tourism Territory Organization, Associate Doctoral Thesis in Geological Geography, Hanoi, 1996.
11. Decision No. 2033/QD – UB on detailed planning of Tien Lang town, Hai Phong city until 2020.
12. Department of Culture, Information, Hai Phong Museum, Hai Phong relics
- National ranked scenic spot, Hai Phong Publishing House, 2005. 13. Tien Lang District People's Committee, Economic Development Planning -
Culture - Society of Tien Lang district to 2010.
14.Website www.HaiPhong.gov.vn
APPENDIX 1
List of national ranked monuments
STT
Name of the monument
Number, year of decisiondetermine
Location
1
Gam Temple
938 VH/QĐ04/08/1992
Cam Khe Village- Toan Thang commune
2
Doc Hau Temple
9381 VH/QĐ04/08/1992
Doc Hau Village –Toan Thang commune
3
Cuu Doi Communal House
3207 VH/QĐDecember 30, 1991
Zone II of townTien Lang
4
Ha Dai Temple
938 VH/QĐ04/08/1992
Ha Dai Village –Tien Thanh commune
APPENDIX II
STT
Name of the monument
Number, year of decision
Location
1
Phu Ke Pagoda Temple
178/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Zone 1 - townTien Lang
2
Trung Lang Temple
178/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Zone 4 – townTien Lang
3
Bao Khanh Pagoda
1900/QD-UBAugust 24, 2006
Nam Tu Village -Kien Thiet commune
4
Bach Da Pagoda
1792/QD-UB11/11/2002
Hung Thang Commune
5
Ngoc Dong Temple
177/QD-UBNovember 27, 2005
Tien Thanh Commune
6
Tomb of Minister TSNhu Van Lan
2848/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2003
Nam Tu Village -Kien Thiet commune
7
Canh Son Stone Temple
2160/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2003
Van Doi Commune –Doan Lap
8
Meiji Temple
2259/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2002
Toan Thang Commune
9
Tien Doi Noi Temple
477/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2005
Doan Lap Commune
10
Tu Doi Temple
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Doan Lap Commune
11
Duyen Lao Temple
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Tien Minh Commune
12
Dinh Xuan Uc Pagoda
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Bac Hung Commune
13
Chu Khe Pagoda
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Hung Thang Commune
14
Dong Dinh
2848/QD-UBNovember 21, 2002
Vinh Quang Commune
15
President's Memorial HouseTon Duc Thang
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
NT Quy Cao
Ha Dai Temple
Ben Vua Temple
Tien Lang hot spring
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 16pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 6pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 12pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
Identify Rating Levels and Rating Scales
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism,quan lan,quang ninh,ecology,ecotourism,minh chau,van don,geography,geographical basis,tourism development,science
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
of the islanders. Therefore, this indicator will be divided into two sub-indicators:
a1. Natural tourism attractiveness a2. Cultural tourism attractiveness
b. Tourist capacity
The two island communes in Quan Lan have different capacities to receive tourists. Minh Chau Commune is home to many standard hotels and resorts, attracting high-income domestic and international tourists. Meanwhile, Quan Lan Commune has many motels mainly built and operated by local people, so the scale and quality are not high, and will be suitable for ordinary tourists such as students.
c. Time of exploitation of Quan Lan Island Commune:
Quan Lan tourism is seasonal due to weather and climate conditions and festivals only take place on certain days of the year, specifically in spring. In Quan Lan commune, the period from April to June and from September to November is considered the best time to visit Quan Lan because the cultural tourism activities are mainly associated with festivals taking place during this time.
Minh Chau island commune:
Tourism exploitation time is all year round, because this is a place with a number of tourist attractions with diverse ecosystems such as Bai Tu Long National Park Research Center, Tram forest, Turtle Laying Beach, so besides coming to the beach for tourism and vacation in the summer, Minh Chau will attract research groups to come for tourism combined with research at other times of the year.
d. Sustainability
The sustainability of ecotourism sites in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes depends on the sensitivity of the ecosystems to climate changes.
landscape. In general, these tourist destinations have a fairly high level of sustainability, because they are natural ecosystems, planned and protected. However, if a large number of tourists gather at certain times, it can exceed the carrying capacity and affect the sustainability of the environment (polluted beaches, damaged trees, animals moving away from their habitats, etc.), then the sustainability of the above ecosystems (natural ecosystems, human ecosystems) will also be affected and become less sustainable.
e. Location and accessibility
Both island communes have ports to take tourists to visit from Van Don wharf:
- Quan Lan – Van Don traffic route:
Phuc Thinh – Viet Anh high-speed boat and Quang Minh high-speed boat, depart at 8am and 2pm from Van Don to Quan Lan, and at 7am and 1pm from Quan Lan to Van Don. There are also wooden boats departing at 7am and 1pm.
- Van Don - Minh Chau traffic route:
Chung Huong high-speed train, Minh Chau train, morning 7:30 and afternoon 13:30 from Van Don to Minh Chau, morning 6:30 and afternoon 13:00 from Minh Chau to Van Don.
f. Infrastructure
Despite receiving investment attention, the issue of infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism on Quan Lan Island is still an issue that needs to be resolved because it has a direct impact on the implementation of ecotourism activities. The minimum conditions for serving tourists such as accommodation, electricity, water, communication, especially medical services, and security work need to be given top priority. Ecotourism spots in Minh Chau commune are assessed to have better infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism because there are quite complete and synchronous conditions for serving tourists, meeting many needs of domestic and foreign tourists.
3.2.1.4. Determine assessment levels and assessment scales
Corresponding to the levels of each criterion, the index is the score of those levels in the order of 4, 3, 2, 1 decreasing according to the standard of each level: very attractive (4), attractive (3), average (2), less attractive (1).
3.2.1.5. Determining the coefficients of the criteria
For the assessment of DLST in the two communes of Quan Lan and Minh Chau islands, the students added evaluation coefficients to show the importance of the criteria and indicators as follows:
Coefficient 3 with criteria: Attractiveness, Exploitation time. These are the 2 most important criteria for attracting tourists to tourism in general and eco-tourism in particular, so they have the highest coefficient.
Coefficient 2 with criteria: Capacity, Infrastructure, Location and accessibility . Because the assessment area is an island commune of Van Don district, the above criteria are selected by the author with appropriate coefficients at the average level.
Coefficient 1 with criteria: Sustainability. Quan Lan has natural and human-made ecotourism sites, with high biodiversity and little impact from local human factors. Most of the ecotourism sites are still wild, so they are highly sustainable.
3.2.1.6. Results of DLST assessment on Quan Lan island
a. Assessment of the potential for natural tourism development
For Minh Chau commune:
+ Natural tourism attractiveness is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined as average (2 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of Capacity criterion is 2 x 2 = 4.
+ Exploitation time is long (4 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Exploitation time criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is assessed as good (3 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 3 x 2 = 6 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Minh Chau commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 4 + 12 + 4 + 4 + 6 = 42 points
Similar assessment for Quan Lan commune, we have the following table:
Table 3.3: Assessment of the potential for natural ecotourism development in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of self-tourismof course
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
CommuneMinh Chau
12
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
42/52
Quan CommuneLan
6
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
33/52
b. Assessment of the potential for humanistic tourism development
For Quan Lan commune:
+ The attractiveness of human tourism is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined to be large (3 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Capacity criterion is 3 x 2 = 6.
+ Mining time is average (3 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Mining time criterion is 3 x 3 = 9.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points.
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is rated as average (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Quan Lan commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 6 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 4 = 36 points.
Similar assessment with Minh Chau commune we have the following table:
Table 3.4: Assessment of the potential for developing humanistic eco-tourism in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of human tourismliterature
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Quan CommuneLan
12
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
39/52
Minh CommuneChau
6
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
36/52
Basically, both Minh Chau and Quan Lan localities have quite favorable conditions for developing ecotourism. However, Quan Lan commune has more advantages to develop ecotourism in a humanistic direction, because this is an area with many famous historical relics such as Quan Lan Communal House, Quan Lan Pagoda, Temple worshiping the hero Tran Khanh Du, ... along with local festivals held annually such as the wind praying ceremony (March 15), Quan Lan festival (June 10-19); due to its location near the port and long exploitation time, the beaches in Quan Lan commune (especially Quan Lan beach) are no longer hygienic and clean to ensure the needs of tourists coming to relax and swim; this is also an area with many beautiful landscapes such as Got Beo wind pass, Ong Phong head, Voi Voi cave, but the ability to access these places is still very limited (dirt hill road, lots of gravel and rocks), especially during rainy and windy times; In addition, other natural resources such as mangrove forests and sea worms have not been really exploited for tourism purposes and ecotourism development. On the contrary, Minh Chau commune has more advantages in developing ecotourism in the direction of natural tourism, this is an area with diverse ecosystems such as at Rua De Beach, Bai Tu Long National Park Conservation Center...; Minh Chau beach is highly appreciated for its natural beauty and cleanliness, ranked in the top ten most beautiful beaches in Vietnam; Minh Chau commune is also home to Tram forest with a large area and a purity of up to 90%, suitable for building bridges through the forest (a very effective type of natural ecotourism currently applied by many countries) for tourists to sightsee, as well as for the purpose of studying and researching.
Figure 3.1: Thenmala Forest Bridge (India) Source: https://www.thenmalaecotourism.com/(August 21, 2019)
3.2.2. Using SWOT matrix to evaluate Quan Lan island tourism
General assessment of current tourism activities of Quan Lan island is shown through the following SWOT matrix:
Table 3.5: SWOT matrix evaluating tourism activities on Quan Lan island
Internal agent
Strengths- There is a lot of potential for tourism development, especially natural ecotourism and humanistic ecotourism.- The unskilled labor force is relatively abundant.- resource environmentunpolluted, still
Weaknesses- Poorly developed infrastructure, especially traffic routes to tourist destinations on the island.- The team of professional staff is still weak.- Tourism products in general
quite wild, originalintact
general and DLST in particularalone is monotonous.
External agents
Opportunity- Tourism is a key industry in the socio-economic development strategy of the province and Van Don economic zone.- Quan Lan was selected as a pilot area for eco-tourism development within the framework of the green growth project between Quang Ninh province and the Japanese organization JICA.- The flow of tourists and especially ecotourism in the world tends toincreasing
Challenge- Weather and climate change abnormally.- Competition in tourism products is increasingly fierce, especially with other localities in the province such as Ha Long, Mong Cai...- Awareness of tourists, especially domestic tourists, about ecotourism and nature conservation is not high.
Through summary analysis using SWOT matrix we see that:
To exploit strengths and take advantage of opportunities, it is necessary to:
- Diversify products and service types (build more tourism routes aimed at specific needs of tourists: experiential tourism immersed in nature, spiritual cultural tourism...)
- Effective exploitation of resources and differentiated products (natural resources and human resources)
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: #0D0D0D; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -3pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Symbol, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:Wingdings; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:Cambria, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: #212121; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
Applying Local Marketing in Bac Ninh Tourism Development - 2 -
The Role of Vinh Phuc Tourism in Local Socio-Economic Development -
Overview of Tourism Development Issues in Vietnam's National Parks
Figure 3.12. Scatter plot of local Moran's I index on tourism revenue in the North Central and South Central Coast regions in 2012 and 2019
Meanwhile, Quang Binh and the remaining localities in the North Central and South Central Coast regions (except Khanh Hoa) are positioned in the LL quadrant (low - low), meaning that the locality has low tourism revenue and neighboring localities are also low during the period 2012 - 2019. Thus, the local and regional linkages in tourism development of these localities (including Quang Binh) are very low, not creating a spillover effect to promote tourism revenue growth for the whole region. This result coincides with the analysis as presented in the previous section, adding further evidence to the conclusion that the overlap in products and the application of quite similar development models is a common situation in many localities in the Central region, which shows the division and fragmentation in tourism development, leading to resources not being used effectively.
In summary, regional connectivity in tourism development in the Central region (including the North Central and South Central Coast regions) focuses on the Thua Thien Hue - Da Nang - Quang Nam tourism cluster. This implies an important policy for Quang Binh province, which is to identify a priority cluster with the three localities of Thua Thien Hue - Da Nang - Quang Nam on the basis of maximizing the potential and advantages of Phong Nha - Ke Bang National Park Heritage to develop inter-local tours according to the program "Central Heritage Road", contributing to creating the difference and uniqueness of regional tourism products, moving towards building the tourism brand of this cluster.
3.4.2. Impact of regional connectivity on the performance of tourism businesses and service establishments in Quang Binh province
In order to achieve the research objective, in this section, the thesis evaluates the impact of regional connectivity on the performance of tourism service businesses and establishments in Quang Binh province (hereinafter referred to as enterprises), operating in 04 main areas, including: travel, accommodation, transportation and restaurants. The method used in this study is descriptive statistics based on survey data sources of tourism service businesses and units. There are 6 criteria used to evaluate the impact of participating in regional connectivity on the performance of enterprises, including: 1) Sharing knowledge, information and resources; 2) reducing promotion and advertising costs; 3) improving competitiveness; 4) expanding business scale; 5) Developing new products; 6) Increasing revenue and profit. The opinions were evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 represents complete disagreement and 5 represents complete agreement.

(Source: Business survey data)
Figure 3.13. Business assessment of the impact of regional connectivity on the performance of tourism service businesses in Quang Binh province
The statistical results show that the evaluation opinions of enterprises have noted some benefits when participating in regional connection activities, which is to help enterprises have the opportunity to share knowledge, exchange information and resources to carry out business activities. This is demonstrated through the evaluation score of the criterion "Sharing knowledge, information and resources" reaching over 4 points, in which the evaluation score of travel enterprises is 4.26 points; of accommodation establishments (4.22 points); of restaurant service establishments is 4.18 points and of transport units is 3.16 points. In addition, the criterion "Reducing promotion and advertising costs" is also positively evaluated by enterprises, with an evaluation score of over 4 points, meaning that participating in regional connection activities has helped enterprises save on promotion and advertising costs for tourism products.
However, the remaining 4 criteria were not highly rated by businesses, which are criteria related to improving competitiveness; expanding the scale of operations; developing new products, especially increasing revenue and profit for businesses. The average score of these criteria was just below 3.5 points, except for the score of travel businesses for the criterion "Increasing revenue and profit" which reached 4.08 points.
Thus, in general, participation in regional connectivity activities in tourism development has only brought about some initial results, mainly creating conditions for businesses to meet, share experiences, exchange information and cooperate in introducing and promoting tourism products and services. This result once again affirms that the current situation of cooperation between businesses in Quang Binh province and businesses and partners outside Quang Binh province has mostly stopped at the level of exchanging information, sharing and guiding tourists to use some basic services in tours and tourist routes to Quang Binh such as: sightseeing, accommodation, food and beverage and transportation. Meanwhile, the linkage in investment, in human resource training and product and service development or linkage at the level of strategic partners, joint ventures and associations has not been implemented extensively and widely. On the other hand, the scope of impact of regional connectivity is quite narrow, limited only to the tourism sector. Many businesses operating in the fields of accommodation, food services, and passenger transport have not yet received the benefits from participating in regional connectivity, the direct cause of which is that the level of participation of these businesses is not high, especially small-scale businesses and establishments.
3.5. Assessment of sustainability in tourism development in Quang Binh province
As presented in chapter 1, the research question raised in this thesis is whether tourism development results in Quang Binh province are achieved in a sustainable manner based on the implementation of policies and programs for regional cooperation and connectivity? To answer this important question, the author continues to analyze and evaluate the sustainability of tourism development in Quang Binh province based on a number of economic, social and environmental indicators such as tourism industry income, the proportion and contribution of tourism industry to GRDP, employment opportunities for local people, and a number of issues related to the ecological environment. The data sources included in the analysis include both secondary and primary data.

(Source: General Statistics Office, Vietnam)
Figure 3.14. Average GRDP per capita of provinces and cities in the Central region in 2018
Regarding economy: According to the report of the Quang Binh Statistics Office, the gross regional domestic product (GRDP) in 2019 at current prices reached 39,155.4 billion VND, an increase of 7.34% compared to 2018 (at 2010 comparative prices); GRDP per capita reached 43.67 million VND. Compared with localities in the Central Highlands and Central Highlands, the per capita income of Quang Binh province ranked 13th out of 14 provinces and cities (higher than Nghe An); lower than the average income of the Central Highlands and Central Highlands and other economic regions in the country; ranked 50th out of 63 provinces and cities in terms of GRDP per capita. This reflects that Quang Binh is still a poor province, the economic life of most people still faces many difficulties, posing many significant challenges for local authorities.
Although the service sector accounted for 54.46% of the province's GRDP in 2019 at current prices and achieved high growth rates for many years, the contribution of the tourism industry to the GRDP of Quang Binh province is still low. Summary and calculation
Calculations from the statistical yearbook data show that the tourism revenue/GRDP ratio of Quang Binh province is about 11 - 14% in the period 2015 - 2019. However, when separating the GRDP of accommodation and catering services (including services not related to tourism), the contribution to the total GRDP of Quang Binh province is less than 5%; meanwhile, the direct contribution rate of the tourism industry to the country's GDP in the year is 9% (Appendix 33) .

(Source: Calculation from Quang Binh Province Statistical Yearbook)
Figure 3.15. Contribution of tourism industry to GRDP of Quang Binh province
Obviously, the current development of tourism in Quang Binh province is still not commensurate with the potential and advantages of tourism resources, the spread and ability to create effects on the economic growth of Quang Binh province is still low. If citing the content of the tourism development plan of Quang Binh province to 2020 and vision to 2025, the development of tourism in Quang Binh province has not achieved the set goals. According to the planning content, the target by 2020, the contribution of tourism to the province's GRDP is 2%. This also poses many significant challenges for the local government of Quang Binh province when tourism is identified as a key economic sector.
Regarding society: Although the contribution of the tourism industry to the economic growth of Quang Binh is not much, it can be said that the spillover effect on the social community is remarkable. First of all, the tourism industry has created many jobs for local people, with about 6,000 direct workers and nearly 12,000 indirect workers (Report of the Department of Tourism, 2019). A 2019 report by the World Bank on the update of Vietnam's economic development (special topic: Vietnam's tourism development) said that poor localities all have quite spectacular tourism growth rates, which shows that tourism is an important economic sector that creates conditions for
Income distribution from rich to poor areas in Vietnam, including Quang Binh province (Appendix 34) . Compared to localities classified in the group with low household income, Quang Binh has a relatively high tourism growth rate, which will contribute significantly to the local poverty reduction process.
In particular, the impact of tourism on a part of the rural population in Quang Binh has become clear, bringing many practical benefits and contributing to local poverty reduction efforts. This can be demonstrated through the development of the community tourism model in the buffer zone of PNKB National Park, which is mainly concentrated in Bo Trach district, Quang Binh province. According to statistics in 2019, in Bo Trach district, there are 122 accommodation service businesses in the homestay and farmstay models. Of which, many models have developed successfully, attracting hundreds of visitors every day, mostly foreign tourists such as: Chay Lap Farmstay, Phong Nha Farmstay, Pepper House Homestay, Ho Khanh Homestay, Jungle Boss Homestay. In addition to the Homestay and Farmstay models, there are also other tourism product and service business models such as: food and beverage services, mountain bike rental, outdoor activities, participating in agricultural production activities with local people. Although the community tourism model has only recently developed and is still small in scale, this type of tourism has contributed significantly to creating jobs and increasing income for local residents, most of whom are low-skilled workers in rural areas.

(Source: Survey data of homestay service business households in 2019)
Figure 3.16. Social impacts of community tourism model in the buffer zone of PNKB National Park
The results of the interview survey of homestay business households show that the majority of household members participating in homestay community tourism are from 2 to 3 members.
At the same time, there are also 4-5 family workers working in community tourism, with main jobs such as: management, service staff, guides, providing experience services and transportation (see Appendix 35) . Furthermore, the benefits of the community tourism model are highly appreciated by these households in some other social aspects such as people having the opportunity to learn foreign languages to serve international tourists; infrastructure, roads, clean water systems, electricity have been somewhat improved, including people's houses have been renovated and upgraded to improve service quality.
However, the impact of community tourism on the social aspect also has some negative issues, in which the majority of people participating in the interview said that the development of community tourism has increased the cost of living compared to before; the appearance of other cultures leads to changes in the community's lifestyle, which is also much different from the previous indigenous lifestyle; the risk of division in the community due to competition and overlapping ideas about how to do community tourism. In particular, the most important issue is that the opportunity for the poor to participate in this type of tourism is still limited, mostly because the scale of community tourism business is not large enough, the education level and understanding of the majority of people in rural areas is still quite limited.
Regarding the environment: In general, tourism products in Quang Binh province currently largely rely on the exploitation of natural resources, concentrated in the PNKB National Park area - a World Natural Heritage. Therefore, in addition to the goal of economic growth of the tourism industry, the issue of preserving the natural ecological environment is also of great concern.
The results of the interview survey show that at tourist destinations, there have been signs of local environmental pollution due to the emission of post-consumer standards by tourists that have not been collected and treated promptly, especially the discharge from the system of restaurants and accommodation facilities in the tourist centers of Dong Hoi city and Phong Nha - Ke Bang area. However, if compared with major tourist centers in the region and the whole country, the system of tourist routes, as well as the density of accommodation facilities and food services serving tourists in Quang Binh province is not large enough, so the negative impact of tourism activities on the environment at the destinations has not occurred on a large scale.

(Source: 2019 tourist survey data)
Figure 3.17. Tourists' perceptions of the environment at tourist attractions in Quang Binh province
The most concerning issue at present in terms of the natural environment is the preservation of the value of the PNKB National Park World Natural Heritage. As presented in the previous section, tourism products in the PNKB National Park area are mostly classified as mass tourism products such as Phong Nha Cave, Thien Duong Cave, Mooc Spring, Chay River - Dark Cave. These are tourism products with low capacity, in addition, they are products chosen by domestic tourists when visiting Quang Binh, which leads to overload during peak season and also means impact on the ecological environment of the PNKB National Park World Natural Heritage.
Thus, Quang Binh tourism is still in the development stage, the industry's influence on the local socio-economy is not large enough. From this reality, the policies of regional cooperation and connectivity in tourism development in Quang Binh province mainly focus on achieving the quantitative growth target of the tourism industry, while not paying attention to qualitative growth, or in other words, not linked to the goal of sustainable tourism development.
3.6. Analysis of factors affecting regional connectivity in tourism development in Quang Binh province
3.6.1. Positive factors creating opportunities for regional connectivity in tourism development in Quang Binh province
Based on the results of in-depth interviews and secondary data collection, this study identifies and summarizes a number of factors that have been creating opportunities for





