STT
Management content | Urgency | ||||||
Very urgent | Urgent | Not urgent | |||||
SL | % | SL | % | SL | % | ||
teaching methods and innovation in testing and evaluating students' learning outcomes | |||||||
4 | Measure 4: Provide professional training for teachers, promote self-training via the Internet according to the requirements of the new general education program. | 43 | 75.44 | 7 | 12.28 | 7 | 12.28 |
5 | Measure 5: Invest in facilities and equipment for teaching and learning, focusing on management and use of computer rooms. | 47 | 82.46 | 6 | 10.53 | 4 | 7.02 |
Maybe you are interested!
-
Testing the Necessity and Feasibility of Measures to Improve Teaching Capacity in the Field of Science and Technology for High School Teachers -
Testing the Urgency and Feasibility of Measures to Manage Geography Teaching Activities -
Measures to Manage and Develop the Teaching Team -
Some Measures to Manage English Teaching Activities at Pakse Pedagogical College -
Measures to improve product quality at Southeast Asia Brewery - 10
Through the table above we see:
+ About urgency
In terms of the urgency of the measures, it can be seen that many managers and teachers think that they are not urgent, as evidenced by the fact that all five measures have assessments of their non-urgency. However, in general, there is not much time left to implement the new general education program, so all measures are generally considered to be very urgent and need to be implemented immediately.
Regarding measure 1: 87.72% rated it as very urgent, 3.51% rated it as not urgent. So, the general assessment is that it is very urgent and needs to be deployed and implemented immediately.
With measure 2: 73.68% rated it as very urgent, 8.77% rated it as not urgent. So, the overall assessment is very urgent.
With measure 3: 78.95% rated it as very urgent, 5.26% rated it as not urgent. So, the overall rating is very urgent.
With measure 4: 75.44% rated it as very urgent, 12.28% rated it as not urgent. So, the overall rating is very urgent.
With measure 2: 82.46% rated it as very urgent, 7.02% rated it as not urgent. So, the overall assessment is very urgent.
Table 3.2. Feasibility survey
STT
Management content | Feasibility | ||||||
Very possible | Possible | Not feasible | |||||
SL | % | SL | % | SL | % | ||
1 | Measure 1: Organize to raise awareness of managers and teachers about teaching and learning Information Technology in the new general education program. | 51 | 89.47 | 6 | 10.53 | ||
2 | Measure 2: Implement and enhance innovation in teaching methods when teaching Information Technology according to the new curriculum orientation. | 55 | 96.49 | 2 | 3.51 | ||
3 | Measure 3: Organize the classification of students according to their abilities to help teachers have a basis for innovating teaching methods and innovating testing and evaluating students' learning outcomes. | 42 | 73.68 | 12 | 21.05 | 3 | 5.26 |
4 | Measure 4: Provide professional training for teachers, promote self-training via the Internet according to the requirements of the new general education program. | 52 | 91.23 | 5 | 8.77 | ||
5 | Measure 5: Invest in facilities and equipment for teaching and learning, focusing on management and use of computer rooms. | 46 | 80.07 | 11 | 19.3 | ||
Through the table above we see:
+ About feasibility
Through the table above, we can see that most of the measures are assessed as highly feasible. However, measures 1, 3, 5 have a feasibility assessment rate of over 10%, which shows that managers and teachers also have many concerns when applying them to their units. In particular, measures
Method 3 was rated as unfeasible by 5.26%. Through discussions with a number of managers and teachers, it was said that:
Firstly: Classifying current student groups is unnecessary because students still basically consider Computer Science as a minor subject, so their learning is sometimes not focused, formal, and superficial.
Second: School facilities are not enough to meet the needs of all students (2-3 students share a computer). Therefore, classifying students is sometimes unnecessary.
So, it can be seen that although there are different opinions about the urgency and feasibility of the proposed measures. However, it can be seen that the proposed measures are both urgent and feasible. If applied in practice in high schools, it can improve the quality of teaching and learning of Information Technology and enhance the capacity and strengths of each student.
CONCLUSION OF CHAPTER 3
Based on the theories and survey results of the current situation at high schools in Yen Lap district, the author proposes four principles to develop implementation measures to improve the quality of teaching and learning Information Technology.
From the research on the current situation of teaching and learning of Informatics at high schools in Yen Lap district. The author has proposed solutions to improve the quality of teaching and learning Informatics according to the orientation of the new general education program at these schools. The proposed measures focus on the management work of the schools, focusing on approaches to the new program and the ultimate goal is to improve the quality of teaching and learning. Within the scope of each school and each different situation, managers and teachers need to flexibly apply measures and proactively build programs and plans so that all applications and changes contribute to improving the quality of teaching and learning at each school.
The proposed measures are closely related to each other and are highly appreciated by school managers and teachers. The solutions have been surveyed for their urgency and feasibility, with the majority of opinions stating that they can be implemented within the framework and conditions of each school.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
1. CONCLUSION
From the above research results, the thesis has obtained:
1.1. Regarding teaching and learning : Teaching and learning are two important, key and core tasks in every school. All tasks such as: innovation in management, innovation in teaching and learning methods, strengthening facilities... all serve the teaching and learning tasks in every school. Managers and teachers need to have full and deep awareness to meet the goals of educational innovation. The transition from the role of the teacher as the center to the student as the center has been and is requiring efforts from both students and teachers.
1.2. The subject of Information Technology in the new general education program has a particularly important role and position in the system of subjects of the new general education program. It will be a compulsory and official subject from grade 3 to grade 12, helping students develop the necessary skills for themselves and other subjects. From that, it can be seen that to achieve the goal of improving the quality of teaching and learning of Information Technology in the new general education program, it requires determination from all levels of government, to the team of managers and teachers of high schools.
1.3. Regarding management work when innovating the general education program : The top goal is to innovate teaching methods to meet the new general education program. Teachers are now the ones who guide students to acquire knowledge, and students must also be the ones who closely coordinate with teachers to proactively grasp knowledge in the future. Therefore, management work also needs to change to meet the teaching requirements of teachers, helping teachers to promote the capacity and strengths of each person. And students are proactive, creative, work more, and cooperate more with each other when participating in educational activities.
1.4. Regarding management work at 3 high schools in Yen Lap district : Management staff have recognized the importance of the content and measures to manage teaching activities to improve the quality of teaching in each school. The schools have specified the regulations of the Ministry of Education and Training and the Department of Education and Training on implementing the curriculum and teaching plans to suit the characteristics of the situation, facilities, and equipment in the school. The schools have used a team of teachers suitable for the training level, capacity, and background of each teacher. From there, teachers can promote their capacity and strengths. However, in each school, there are tasks that have not been focused on such as: checking teachers' self-improvement work, and preparing lessons before class is not regular and continuous.
1.5. Measures to improve the quality of teaching management
To improve the quality of school management in teaching activities, schools need to implement the following measures well:
- Raising awareness of managers and teachers about teaching and learning Information Technology in the new general education program.
- Strengthen innovation in teaching methods when teaching Information Technology according to the new curriculum orientation
- Classify students according to their abilities to help teachers have a basis for innovating teaching methods and innovating testing and evaluating students' learning outcomes.
- Provide professional training for teachers, promote self-training via the Internet according to the requirements of the new general education program.
- Invest in facilities and equipment for teaching and learning, focusing on management and use of computer rooms.
These measures are closely related to each other and to achieve the highest efficiency in management work, managers and teachers must be unanimous and determined while performing their tasks.
2. RECOMMENDATIONS
2.1. For the Ministry of Education and Training
- Continue to develop guidance documents on implementing the new general education program such as: guidance on choosing teaching topics, choosing subjects, and testing and assessment methods according to the new orientation.
- Instructions to schools and teachers on teaching according to the new program.
- There are guidelines allowing schools to teach certain lesson topics through online teaching to help students have the opportunity to experience technology right in the lesson.
- Strengthen and innovate training for managers and teachers in professional skills through many forms such as: direct and online to ensure efficiency and high quality.
2.2. For the Department of Education and Training
- Propose to the Provincial People's Committee on recruiting teachers and students with good professional skills for the province. Have policies to attract talents for schools. Move towards allowing schools to be autonomous or partially autonomous in personnel work.
- Continue to maintain and improve professional training courses to help teachers have the opportunity to exchange and improve themselves.
- Build and maintain a stable, long-term core team of teachers.
2.3. For high schools
- Deeply understand the Party and State's guidelines, policies and strategies on education and training.
- Proactively, flexibly and creatively apply appropriate measures to each school's conditions to effectively implement directives from superiors and improve the quality of teaching and learning.
- Maximize the mobilization of resources for teaching and learning to motivate teachers and students to perform well in teaching and learning.
- Ensure adequate and suitable facilities and equipment during the teaching process.
- Through many different forms, help managers and teachers improve their expertise and skills to best meet the new general education program.