of the Korean labor market, the current state of this situation and from there propose appropriate solutions for the coming time.
a. Characteristics of the Korean labor market and the meeting of needs and interests of the Vietnam - Korea relationship in the field of labor cooperation.
Overall, the labor force in South Korea is quite large, currently around 22 million people. The country's workforce is highly skilled and well-educated. Over 73% of the total workforce has a secondary education and 58% has a secondary or higher education. South Korea has the highest proportion of people with doctoral degrees in the total population in the world. Currently, over 87% of the workforce is employed in the non-agricultural sector. In the 1950s and 1960s, with its low wages and long working hours, South Korea became an ideal location for the development of labor-intensive industries. Moreover, the South Korean workforce has a reputation for high-quality work, efficient productivity, and good education. In addition, compared to other industrialized countries, such as the United States, Japan, and Germany, South Korea's wages were considered very low (the average worker's wage was $100, lower than that of India). Coupled with the shift from an import-substitution to an export-oriented industrialization strategy in the early 1960s, South Korea was considered an attractive location for foreign investors at that time.
After a short period of implementing an export-oriented industrialization strategy, the Korean economy began to take off. The rapid economic growth of Korea was accompanied by an increase in workers' wages. Typically, in the early 1990s, the monthly salary of middle managers and professionals was between $1,392 and $1,671, depending on the industry, company, organization, individual, and seniority. Senior managers and executives earned higher salaries, between $4,177 and $5,570. They also received other benefits, such as cars, personal drivers, club memberships, and the freedom to spend certain amounts of company money without having to list each item.
68
for those expenses. By 2002, the average monthly wage of companies with five or more workers was $1,630, an increase of about 11.2 percent over 2001. Also in this year, the highest wage increase was in the manufacturing sector (22.8 percent), followed by the social services sector (19 percent), much higher than the average increase for the entire workforce (15.7 percent). The increase in wages has significantly improved the living standards of workers, but at the same time it has made Korea no longer competitive in many industries, especially those with high labor content.
In addition to rising wages, the Korean labor market is also experiencing a labor shortage. In 1991, the Korean Ministry of Labor estimated the country's labor shortage at 220,000 manufacturing workers and 30,000 technical workers. Since the beginning of 1992, small and medium-sized enterprises in Korea have been short of workers by an average of 25 percent. Due to the labor shortage and high labor costs, many small and medium-sized enterprises have gone bankrupt, and their international competitiveness has declined. According to the Korean Small and Medium Business Administration (SMBA), through a survey of 1,029 small and medium-sized enterprises with a payroll of 500,000 or more,
- 300 workers shows that the labor shortage rate is about 9.41%. If calculated for all 130,000 SMBAs in Korea, the number of additional workers needed is up to
201,200 people. By 2006, the labor shortage rate was still climbing - it was at 9.36%, compared to 3.98% in 2005.
There are several reasons for the labor shortage in Korea. First, it is due to the influence of the population growth restriction policy. They pursued this policy vigorously, systematically and considered it as part of the overall economic strategy. The Korean government also advocated creating more jobs for women of childbearing age. This has increased the number of women participating in the labor force and at the same time reduced their birth rate. Second, with unemployment at a low of 3.7% during the period 2000-2006, Koreans tend to avoid doing the 3 D jobs (dirty; dangerous; difficult). This has caused the Korean economy to experience a labor shortage, especially in the manufacturing industry. Besides
Therefore, the rapid development of the Korean economy has caused a sharp increase in the demand for labor in industries such as garment, construction, shipbuilding, export production... mainly concentrated in small and medium enterprises, this is one of the reasons why the Korean economy has had to face the problem of labor shortage. Third, the decline in the participation of young labor force in the market and the problem of labor aging. Since the mid-1970s, the participation rate of workers aged 15-19 in the labor market has decreased. In the 2000s, while the average unemployment rate of the whole country was about 3.7%, that of young workers was 7-8%. The main reasons are the time spent in school and the desire to have a high level of education of young people and the decline in opportunities to find part-time jobs. Korea is facing the problem of labor aging. The proportion of workers aged 55 and over increased from 10% in 1990 to 19% in 2005.
To help solve the labor shortage, the Korean government has introduced a program that allows foreigners to enter Korea to work for one to two years, and in recent years the Korean government has suspended the forced departure of foreign workers working illegally in Korea. However, the labor shortage is still becoming more and more serious. According to Mr. Park Soong Hee, Chairman of the Korea Federation of Small and Medium Industries, who acts as a government representative, the labor shortage in small and medium-sized industrial enterprises is very severe. If foreign workers are not allowed to immigrate, a large number of factories will be forced to close or move their facilities abroad.
The question is what kind of labor and what level of labor is lacking in Korea? In the early 1990s, labor shortages were mainly in the material production sector, in SMEs, and with low skill levels. In recent years, especially with the transition to a knowledge-based economy, the demand for high-skilled labor has gradually increased. Therefore, Korea needs to import not only low-skilled labor, but also high-skilled labor.
Thus, Korea has a need to import foreign labor. Foreign countries also have a need to export labor to Korea. Let's compare the average salary of Korea with other countries in the region. While the average salary of Korea in recent years is 1,800 USD, the average salary of a university graduate in the Philippines is only 150 USD, Malaysia 170-250 USD/month, Thailand is 200 baht a day (5.41 USD), or about 162.3 USD/month, Vietnam is much lower. That fact has created a need to export labor to Korea from the above countries. Therefore, it can be said that Korea's need to import labor, especially simple labor from abroad, will be partly met through bilateral labor exchanges with Vietnam and other countries with lower wages. Through that, Vietnam gains certain benefits - solving the employment problem for workers, increasing their income, and gaining a potential source of foreign currency.
b. Korea's policy towards foreign workers
Since 1992, Korea has been accepting immigrant workers. However, according to the Korean Immigration and Migration Law, only skilled foreign workers such as experts, researchers, etc. can work in this country, while unskilled workers are only allowed to participate in the Intern Trainee Program. According to this law, illegal workers in Korea are workers who overstay their permitted period, unregistered immigrants. These people are not only fined, depending on the length of their overstay, but also have to bear all costs related to repatriation.
Korea's immigration policy focuses on solving several major problems: providing incentives for skilled foreign workers, institutionalizing the immigration of unskilled workers, preventing illegal immigration, and facilitating the integration of foreign workers into the Korean community. For legal workers in Korea, including trainees, the government has created conditions for them to enter the country and enjoy many benefits, while being protected by a very strict legal corridor. They are paid adequately.
enough, do not have to pay rent, food and many other expenses and participate in insurance. For skilled workers, the policy is significantly relaxed, because it is considered that this is a very good supplement to the Korean labor market. Their stay in Korea is almost unlimited, and administrative procedures related to entry and residence registration are simplified. As for unskilled workers, the policy is tightened, because it is considered that beyond a certain limit, this force will play a role in replacing domestic workers, which means they will lose their jobs. Therefore, the import of unskilled workers is carried out through the Trainee Program, which is under the management of the Korea Federation of Small Business (KFSB). This agency decides the number of foreign workers allowed to enter Korea through the Trainee Program, allocates them to permitted countries and to industries in need. Currently, 15 countries (including Vietnam) are participating in this program. According to the Labor Standards Law and the Minimum Wage and Industrial Accident Insurance Law, trainees are entitled to health insurance, minimum wage system and industrial accident insurance. Since the maximum period of stay in Korea is 3 years and the risk of losing their jobs is very low, these people are not entitled to unemployment benefits and pensions.
The issue of illegal foreign workers, accounting for about 64% of the total foreign workers, is currently very urgent and controversial for the Korean government. The general view of Korea is not to support the flow of illegal foreign workers, because their presence forces the government to increase management costs, making domestic workers at risk of losing their jobs, and employers have the opportunity to become freeloaders due to reduced costs compared to hiring local workers. Before the 1997-1998 crisis, the Korean government often applied fines and forced repatriation to illegal workers. After the crisis, the Korean government considered labor market reform as one of the four main areas of the economic recovery program, aiming to increase the flexibility of this market and meet the needs of the labor market.
requirements of the modern economy. To more effectively address the issue of illegal foreign labor, the Labor Permit Law was passed by the Korean National Assembly on July 31, 2003, and approved by the President in September 2003, with two main contents: the Labor Permit Mechanism and solutions for classifying and accepting foreign workers residing illegally in Korea. In the spirit of this Law, since August 2004, foreign workers in the Korean labor market have worked under the same conditions and enjoyed the same benefits as local workers. On that basis, many policies related to immigrant labor in general and illegal labor in particular have been and are being amended, creating new opportunities for businesses exporting labor to Korea, including Vietnam.
c. Current status of Vietnamese labor export to Korea
To solve the employment problem for workers, since the 1980s, the Vietnamese government has exported labor abroad. In addition to the traditional labor export markets such as Libya, Iraq, Lebanon, Arabia, Yemen, the former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, Vietnamese laborers have been exported to a number of countries in the East Asian region such as Japan, Taiwan, Singapore, Malaysia, Laos, South Korea, etc.
Compared to other countries in the region, the governments of Vietnam and South Korea have paid early attention to developing cooperative relations on labor. In the early 1990s, many Korean businesses came to Vietnam to learn about investment policies and the use of Vietnamese labor. Some companies from the two countries signed many labor contracts and sent about 2,500 workers to work in South Korea on fishing boats, transport ships and construction sites of Korean companies in Libya.
Table 2.10: Vietnamese workers in Korea (1995-2006)
Unit: person
Year
Number of employees | |
1995 | 5,674 |
1996 | 6.275 |
1997 | 4,880 |
Maybe you are interested!
-
Technical Facilities and Tourism Labor Force in Special-Use Forest of Huong Pagoda Area -
Labor Force Fluctuation of Thai Duong in 2008-2010 Period. -
Solutions for tourism development in Tien Lang - 10
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism, tourism development
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
- District People's Committees and authorities of communes with tourist attractions should support, promote, and provide necessary information to people, helping them improve their knowledge about tourism. Raise tourism awareness for local people.
*
* *
Due to limited knowledge and research time, the thesis inevitably has shortcomings. Therefore, I look forward to receiving guidance from teachers, experts as well as your comments to make the thesis more complete.
Chapter III Conclusion
Through the issues presented in Chapter II, we can come to some conclusions:
Based on the strengths of available tourism resources, the types of tourism in Tien Lang that need to be promoted in the coming time are sightseeing and resort tourism, discovery tourism, weekend tourism. To improve the quality and diversify tourism products, Tien Lang district needs to combine with local cultural tourism resources, at the same time combine with surrounding areas, build rich tourism products. The strengths of Tien Lang tourism are eco-tourism and cultural tourism, so developing Tien Lang tourism must always go hand in hand with restoring and preserving types of cultural tourism resources. Some necessary measures to support and improve the efficiency of exploiting tourism resources in Tien Lang are: strengthening the construction of technical facilities and labor force serving tourism, actively promoting and advertising tourism, and expanding forms of capital mobilization for tourism development.
CONCLUDE
I Conclusion
1. Based on the results achieved within the framework of the thesis's needs, some basic conclusions can be drawn as follows:
Tien Lang is a locality with great potential for tourism development. The relatively abundant cultural tourism resources and ecological tourism resources have great appeal to tourists. Based on this potential, Tien Lang can build a unique tourism industry that is competitive enough with other localities within Hai Phong city and neighboring areas.
In recent years, the exploitation of the advantages of resources to develop tourism and build tourist routes in Tien Lang has not been commensurate with the available potential. In terms of quantity, many resource objects have not been brought into the purpose of tourism development. In terms of time, the regular service time has not been extended to attract more visitors. Infrastructure and technical facilities are still weak. The labor force is still thin and weak in terms of expertise. Tourism programs and routes have not been organized properly, the exploitation content is still monotonous, so it has not attracted many visitors. Although resources have not been mobilized much for tourism development, they are facing the risk of destruction and degradation.
2. Based on the results of investigation, analysis, synthesis, evaluation and selective absorption of research results of related topics, the thesis has proposed a number of necessary solutions to improve the efficiency of exploiting tourism resources in Tien Lang such as: promoting the restoration and conservation of tourism resources, focusing on investment and key exploitation of ecotourism resources, strengthening the construction of infrastructure and tourism workforce. Expanding forms of capital mobilization. In addition, the thesis has built a number of tourist routes of Hai Phong in which Tien Lang tourism resources play an important role.
Exploiting Tien Lang tourism resources for tourism development is currently facing many difficulties. The above measures, if applied synchronously, will likely bring new prospects for the local tourism industry, contributing to making Tien Lang tourism an important economic sector in the district's economic structure.
REFERENCES
1. Nhuan Ha, Trinh Minh Hien, Tran Phuong, Hai Phong - Historical and cultural relics, Hai Phong Publishing House, 1993
2. Hai Phong City History Council, Hai Phong Gazetteer, Hai Phong Publishing House, 1990.
3. Hai Phong City History Council, History of Tien Lang District Party Committee, Hai Phong Publishing House, 1990.
4. Hai Phong City History Council, University of Social Sciences and Humanities, VNU, Hai Phong Place Names Encyclopedia, Hai Phong Publishing House. 2001.
5. Law on Cultural Heritage and documents guiding its implementation, National Political Publishing House, Hanoi, 2003.
6. Tran Duc Thanh, Lecture on Tourism Geography, Faculty of Tourism, University of Social Sciences and Humanities, VNU, 2006
7. Hai Phong Center for Social Sciences and Humanities, Some typical cultural heritages of Hai Phong, Hai Phong Publishing House, 2001
8. Nguyen Ngoc Thao (editor-in-chief, Tourism Geography, Hai Phong Publishing House, two volumes (2001-2002)
9. Nguyen Minh Tue and group of authors, Hai Phong Tourism Geography, Ho Chi Minh City Publishing House, 1997.
10. Nguyen Thanh Son, Hai Phong Tourism Territory Organization, Associate Doctoral Thesis in Geological Geography, Hanoi, 1996.
11. Decision No. 2033/QD – UB on detailed planning of Tien Lang town, Hai Phong city until 2020.
12. Department of Culture, Information, Hai Phong Museum, Hai Phong relics
- National ranked scenic spot, Hai Phong Publishing House, 2005. 13. Tien Lang District People's Committee, Economic Development Planning -
Culture - Society of Tien Lang district to 2010.
14.Website www.HaiPhong.gov.vn
APPENDIX 1
List of national ranked monuments
STT
Name of the monument
Number, year of decisiondetermine
Location
1
Gam Temple
938 VH/QĐ04/08/1992
Cam Khe Village- Toan Thang commune
2
Doc Hau Temple
9381 VH/QĐ04/08/1992
Doc Hau Village –Toan Thang commune
3
Cuu Doi Communal House
3207 VH/QĐDecember 30, 1991
Zone II of townTien Lang
4
Ha Dai Temple
938 VH/QĐ04/08/1992
Ha Dai Village –Tien Thanh commune
APPENDIX II
STT
Name of the monument
Number, year of decision
Location
1
Phu Ke Pagoda Temple
178/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Zone 1 - townTien Lang
2
Trung Lang Temple
178/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Zone 4 – townTien Lang
3
Bao Khanh Pagoda
1900/QD-UBAugust 24, 2006
Nam Tu Village -Kien Thiet commune
4
Bach Da Pagoda
1792/QD-UB11/11/2002
Hung Thang Commune
5
Ngoc Dong Temple
177/QD-UBNovember 27, 2005
Tien Thanh Commune
6
Tomb of Minister TSNhu Van Lan
2848/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2003
Nam Tu Village -Kien Thiet commune
7
Canh Son Stone Temple
2160/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2003
Van Doi Commune –Doan Lap
8
Meiji Temple
2259/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2002
Toan Thang Commune
9
Tien Doi Noi Temple
477/QD-UBSeptember 19, 2005
Doan Lap Commune
10
Tu Doi Temple
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Doan Lap Commune
11
Duyen Lao Temple
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Tien Minh Commune
12
Dinh Xuan Uc Pagoda
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Bac Hung Commune
13
Chu Khe Pagoda
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
Hung Thang Commune
14
Dong Dinh
2848/QD-UBNovember 21, 2002
Vinh Quang Commune
15
President's Memorial HouseTon Duc Thang
177/QD-UBJanuary 28, 2005
NT Quy Cao
Ha Dai Temple
Ben Vua Temple
Tien Lang hot spring
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 16pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 6pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 12pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
Identify Rating Levels and Rating Scales
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism,quan lan,quang ninh,ecology,ecotourism,minh chau,van don,geography,geographical basis,tourism development,science
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
of the islanders. Therefore, this indicator will be divided into two sub-indicators:
a1. Natural tourism attractiveness a2. Cultural tourism attractiveness
b. Tourist capacity
The two island communes in Quan Lan have different capacities to receive tourists. Minh Chau Commune is home to many standard hotels and resorts, attracting high-income domestic and international tourists. Meanwhile, Quan Lan Commune has many motels mainly built and operated by local people, so the scale and quality are not high, and will be suitable for ordinary tourists such as students.
c. Time of exploitation of Quan Lan Island Commune:
Quan Lan tourism is seasonal due to weather and climate conditions and festivals only take place on certain days of the year, specifically in spring. In Quan Lan commune, the period from April to June and from September to November is considered the best time to visit Quan Lan because the cultural tourism activities are mainly associated with festivals taking place during this time.
Minh Chau island commune:
Tourism exploitation time is all year round, because this is a place with a number of tourist attractions with diverse ecosystems such as Bai Tu Long National Park Research Center, Tram forest, Turtle Laying Beach, so besides coming to the beach for tourism and vacation in the summer, Minh Chau will attract research groups to come for tourism combined with research at other times of the year.
d. Sustainability
The sustainability of ecotourism sites in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes depends on the sensitivity of the ecosystems to climate changes.
landscape. In general, these tourist destinations have a fairly high level of sustainability, because they are natural ecosystems, planned and protected. However, if a large number of tourists gather at certain times, it can exceed the carrying capacity and affect the sustainability of the environment (polluted beaches, damaged trees, animals moving away from their habitats, etc.), then the sustainability of the above ecosystems (natural ecosystems, human ecosystems) will also be affected and become less sustainable.
e. Location and accessibility
Both island communes have ports to take tourists to visit from Van Don wharf:
- Quan Lan – Van Don traffic route:
Phuc Thinh – Viet Anh high-speed boat and Quang Minh high-speed boat, depart at 8am and 2pm from Van Don to Quan Lan, and at 7am and 1pm from Quan Lan to Van Don. There are also wooden boats departing at 7am and 1pm.
- Van Don - Minh Chau traffic route:
Chung Huong high-speed train, Minh Chau train, morning 7:30 and afternoon 13:30 from Van Don to Minh Chau, morning 6:30 and afternoon 13:00 from Minh Chau to Van Don.
f. Infrastructure
Despite receiving investment attention, the issue of infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism on Quan Lan Island is still an issue that needs to be resolved because it has a direct impact on the implementation of ecotourism activities. The minimum conditions for serving tourists such as accommodation, electricity, water, communication, especially medical services, and security work need to be given top priority. Ecotourism spots in Minh Chau commune are assessed to have better infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism because there are quite complete and synchronous conditions for serving tourists, meeting many needs of domestic and foreign tourists.
3.2.1.4. Determine assessment levels and assessment scales
Corresponding to the levels of each criterion, the index is the score of those levels in the order of 4, 3, 2, 1 decreasing according to the standard of each level: very attractive (4), attractive (3), average (2), less attractive (1).
3.2.1.5. Determining the coefficients of the criteria
For the assessment of DLST in the two communes of Quan Lan and Minh Chau islands, the students added evaluation coefficients to show the importance of the criteria and indicators as follows:
Coefficient 3 with criteria: Attractiveness, Exploitation time. These are the 2 most important criteria for attracting tourists to tourism in general and eco-tourism in particular, so they have the highest coefficient.
Coefficient 2 with criteria: Capacity, Infrastructure, Location and accessibility . Because the assessment area is an island commune of Van Don district, the above criteria are selected by the author with appropriate coefficients at the average level.
Coefficient 1 with criteria: Sustainability. Quan Lan has natural and human-made ecotourism sites, with high biodiversity and little impact from local human factors. Most of the ecotourism sites are still wild, so they are highly sustainable.
3.2.1.6. Results of DLST assessment on Quan Lan island
a. Assessment of the potential for natural tourism development
For Minh Chau commune:
+ Natural tourism attractiveness is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined as average (2 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of Capacity criterion is 2 x 2 = 4.
+ Exploitation time is long (4 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Exploitation time criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is assessed as good (3 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 3 x 2 = 6 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Minh Chau commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 4 + 12 + 4 + 4 + 6 = 42 points
Similar assessment for Quan Lan commune, we have the following table:
Table 3.3: Assessment of the potential for natural ecotourism development in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of self-tourismof course
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
CommuneMinh Chau
12
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
42/52
Quan CommuneLan
6
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
33/52
b. Assessment of the potential for humanistic tourism development
For Quan Lan commune:
+ The attractiveness of human tourism is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined to be large (3 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Capacity criterion is 3 x 2 = 6.
+ Mining time is average (3 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Mining time criterion is 3 x 3 = 9.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points.
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is rated as average (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Quan Lan commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 6 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 4 = 36 points.
Similar assessment with Minh Chau commune we have the following table:
Table 3.4: Assessment of the potential for developing humanistic eco-tourism in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of human tourismliterature
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Quan CommuneLan
12
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
39/52
Minh CommuneChau
6
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
36/52
Basically, both Minh Chau and Quan Lan localities have quite favorable conditions for developing ecotourism. However, Quan Lan commune has more advantages to develop ecotourism in a humanistic direction, because this is an area with many famous historical relics such as Quan Lan Communal House, Quan Lan Pagoda, Temple worshiping the hero Tran Khanh Du, ... along with local festivals held annually such as the wind praying ceremony (March 15), Quan Lan festival (June 10-19); due to its location near the port and long exploitation time, the beaches in Quan Lan commune (especially Quan Lan beach) are no longer hygienic and clean to ensure the needs of tourists coming to relax and swim; this is also an area with many beautiful landscapes such as Got Beo wind pass, Ong Phong head, Voi Voi cave, but the ability to access these places is still very limited (dirt hill road, lots of gravel and rocks), especially during rainy and windy times; In addition, other natural resources such as mangrove forests and sea worms have not been really exploited for tourism purposes and ecotourism development. On the contrary, Minh Chau commune has more advantages in developing ecotourism in the direction of natural tourism, this is an area with diverse ecosystems such as at Rua De Beach, Bai Tu Long National Park Conservation Center...; Minh Chau beach is highly appreciated for its natural beauty and cleanliness, ranked in the top ten most beautiful beaches in Vietnam; Minh Chau commune is also home to Tram forest with a large area and a purity of up to 90%, suitable for building bridges through the forest (a very effective type of natural ecotourism currently applied by many countries) for tourists to sightsee, as well as for the purpose of studying and researching.
Figure 3.1: Thenmala Forest Bridge (India) Source: https://www.thenmalaecotourism.com/(August 21, 2019)
3.2.2. Using SWOT matrix to evaluate Quan Lan island tourism
General assessment of current tourism activities of Quan Lan island is shown through the following SWOT matrix:
Table 3.5: SWOT matrix evaluating tourism activities on Quan Lan island
Internal agent
Strengths- There is a lot of potential for tourism development, especially natural ecotourism and humanistic ecotourism.- The unskilled labor force is relatively abundant.- resource environmentunpolluted, still
Weaknesses- Poorly developed infrastructure, especially traffic routes to tourist destinations on the island.- The team of professional staff is still weak.- Tourism products in general
quite wild, originalintact
general and DLST in particularalone is monotonous.
External agents
Opportunity- Tourism is a key industry in the socio-economic development strategy of the province and Van Don economic zone.- Quan Lan was selected as a pilot area for eco-tourism development within the framework of the green growth project between Quang Ninh province and the Japanese organization JICA.- The flow of tourists and especially ecotourism in the world tends toincreasing
Challenge- Weather and climate change abnormally.- Competition in tourism products is increasingly fierce, especially with other localities in the province such as Ha Long, Mong Cai...- Awareness of tourists, especially domestic tourists, about ecotourism and nature conservation is not high.
Through summary analysis using SWOT matrix we see that:
To exploit strengths and take advantage of opportunities, it is necessary to:
- Diversify products and service types (build more tourism routes aimed at specific needs of tourists: experiential tourism immersed in nature, spiritual cultural tourism...)
- Effective exploitation of resources and differentiated products (natural resources and human resources)
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: #0D0D0D; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -3pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Symbol, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:Wingdings; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:Cambria, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: #212121; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
Linking Income to Revenue and Labor Quality

1,322 | |
1999 | 4,518 |
2000 | 7,316 |
2001 | 3,910 |
2002 | 1,190 |
2003 | 4,336 |
2004 | 4,783 |
2005 | 12.102 |
2006 | 9,000 |
1998
Source: Department of Overseas Labor Management.
Korea is one of the markets that attracts the most Vietnamese labor export. Since 1993, there have been about 60,000 Vietnamese workers in Korea, of which over 40,000 work in small and medium enterprises and about 6,500 are fishing boat crew members. In 2006, Korea received about 102,000 foreign workers. Of which, the work permit program received 70,000 workers and the trainee program received about 32,000 people. Thailand has the largest number of workers under this program with 11,000 people, followed by the Philippines with 10,000 people and Vietnam with 9,000 people. The number of Vietnamese workers sent to Korea for training has increased significantly from 5,674 in 1995 to 7,316 in 2000 and 9,000 in 2006. This army of exported workers has brought in a significant amount of foreign currency, supplementing the country's foreign currency revenue. This year, Korea has not allocated a quota for receiving workers, but has based it on the market's ability to receive them. According to the Overseas Labor Center (Ministry of Labor - Invalids and Social Affairs), it is likely that in 2007, there will be more than
6,000 Vietnamese workers go to work in this market.
Vietnamese labor exports to Korea are mainly in the form of industrial trainees or interns. This is a program for foreign workers working in Korea managed by the Korea Federation of Small Business (KFSB), applied since 1993 to solve the shortage of labor in industries.
dangerous, difficult and toxic (3D) industries, with low salaries, which local workers do not want to do. Statistics from the General Statistics Office show that Vietnam ranks third (after China and Indonesia) in the number of trainees allocated by the KFSB. Normally, the average salary of each Vietnamese worker in Korea is about 750 - 1200 USD/month . A fairly attractive salary for Vietnamese workers, especially those from rural areas looking for work, those with low education levels mainly looking for labor-intensive jobs.
Table 2.11: Labor by occupation in Korea (1995-2006)
Unit: person, %
Industry
Number of employees | Proportion | |
Industrial | 42,105 | 74.78 |
Build | 1,954 | 3.47 |
Transportation | 5,495 | 9.76 |
Agriculture | 214 | 0.38 |
Forestry | 0 | 0.00 |
Trade and services | 0 | 0.00 |
Aquaculture | 6,514 | 11.57 |
Air | 24 | 0.04 |
Medical | 0 | 0.00 |
Other industries | 0 | 0.00 |
Total | 56,306 | 100 |
Source: Department of Overseas Labor Management
There are currently 8 Vietnamese companies recognized as dispatching companies, responsible for selecting and sending workers to work in Korea. Those companies are VINACONEX, SOVILACO, LOD, SULECO, TRACIMEXCO, OLECO,
RACODI, IMS. The figures provide us with information on the allocated quota, the number of trainees who have entered Korea, the number who are currently working in the country, as well as the number of workers who have broken their contracts and fled abroad. Through this, it can be seen that the rate of workers who have broken their contracts and fled abroad in Vietnam is





