According to table 2.4, investment projects in the industrial sector that were still in effect from 1991 to the end of 2005 had 30 projects, accounting for 39.47% of the total 76 projects in all sectors with investment capital reaching 203,246,675 USD, accounting for 39.50% of the total capital of 513,770,023 USD of all valid projects. Since the Asian financial and economic crisis in 1997, especially after 2000, after two consecutive years of Quang Ninh not attracting any projects in the industrial sector, the situation of attracting foreign direct investment in the industrial sector showed signs of recovery and continuously increased strongly in the following years. By 2005, the investment capital attracted in the industrial sector had made a leap forward, reaching 13,700,000 USD compared to 2000 (only 500,000 USD), an increase of more than 27 times. This is a positive signal demonstrating the effectiveness of the efforts of the leaders of Quang Ninh province in improving the investment environment and promoting foreign direct investment.
However, the period 1993-2000 also witnessed instability in attracting and implementing foreign investment projects not only in the industrial sector, the attraction results were positive, but the number of projects that could not be implemented or were implemented ineffectively was quite large. In the period 1993-2000, 20 projects had their investment licenses revoked with a total capital of 573,374,072 USD. Notably, during this period, there were two large projects on the cement industry in Hoanh Bo district with a total investment capital of 510,000,000 USD that could not be implemented, there were both subjective and objective reasons.
The situation of attracting foreign direct investment in the industrial sector in the recent period clearly reflects both the difficulties and advantages of Quang Ninh.
In terms of advantages, first of all, the political and social environment is stable, which creates the best conditions for investment and business of all economic sectors and foreign investors. To achieve the above results, Quang Ninh is working with the whole country to implement sustainable development policies, eliminate hunger and reduce poverty, create jobs, and maintain socio-economic stability.
Second, we must mention the geographical location and natural conditions of Quang Ninh. Quang Ninh has a strategic location in the key economic zone of the North, with an international border gate for trade with China.
Third, Quang Ninh's population is over 1 million people, of which the number of people of working age with knowledge, skills and experience is quite large, able to meet all requirements for labor recruitment for projects. At the same time, Vietnam is also a large consumer market for products.
Fourth, Quang Ninh is rich in natural mineral resources, which is a potential for processing, mining, mechanical and shipbuilding industries. Quang Ninh is also a province with a tradition of coal mining.
Fifth, the policy system on foreign direct investment as well as the awareness of the importance of foreign direct investment are receiving special attention from all levels and sectors. This creates a legal basis as well as confidence for foreign investors when investing in Vietnam in general and Quang Ninh Province in particular.
Besides the advantages, Quang Ninh province is also facing great difficulties in attracting foreign direct investment in the industrial sector. There are both objective and subjective reasons.
Regarding objective reasons, we must mention the unstable world political situation. The investment market tends to decrease in some traditional markets such as Singapore and Taiwan.
Regarding subjective causes, policies on investment attraction are not yet consistent, there are many shortcomings, and awareness among all levels and sectors is inconsistent, thus causing many difficulties for investment promotion and attraction.
The investment environment still has many limitations, and the capacity of staff is not up to par with the demands and requirements of the job. Although administrative procedures have been reformed, they have not been completely overcome, affecting the psychology of investors.
Many investors have come to Quang Ninh to seek investment opportunities but failed due to lack of land for the project. For example, a Korean investor intended to invest in a stainless steel rolling mill with an investment capital of over 100 million USD but could not do so due to lack of land (about 15-20 hectares) and many other investors are in the same situation.
* Tourism and service sector
As of December 31, 2005, Quang Ninh province had 32 investment projects in the tourism and service sector with legal validity, accounting for 42.11% of the total number of projects, with a total investment capital of 290,348,348 USD, accounting for 56.50% of the total FDI investment capital with legal validity. This is the sector with the largest revenue proportion. Currently, 21 projects have officially come into operation, 09 projects are in the basic construction stage, 02 projects have not been implemented since being granted an investment license. There are 6 hotels and 1 villa area put into operation, with 2,900 rooms meeting 3-star standards or higher. In addition, FDI enterprises also invest in service activities to attract tourists such as: Entertainment areas with prizes for foreigners (Hoang Gia International Joint Venture Company, Hai Ninh Loi Lai Joint Venture Company), outdoor parks (Hoang Gia International Joint Venture Company, Hong Van Hotel Joint Venture Company), eco-tourism, accommodation tourism on the bay, ... have contributed to diversifying service types to create attraction for tourists. Most FDI enterprises in the tourism sector operate stably, contributing positively to the economic development of the locality, creating jobs for thousands of workers with stable income, exploiting the advantages of the province to serve the economic development of the country.
Table 2.6. FDI investment situation in tourism - services sector in the period 1993-2005
(as of December 2005 - only valid projects are counted)
Year
Project Number | Total investment (USD) | |
1993 | 2 | 30,751,048 |
1994 | 1 | 46,000,000 |
1995 | 2 | 22,000,000 |
1998 | 1 | 9,500,000 |
2000 | 2 | 3,550,000 |
2001 | 1 | 576,000 |
2002 | 6 | 77,695,400 |
2003 | 4 | 30,500,000 |
2004 | 8 | 61,484,900 |
2005 | 5 | 38,800,000 |
Total | 32 | 290,348,348 |
Maybe you are interested!
-
Current situation and solutions to attract foreign direct investment in Vietnam's tourism industry - 2 -
Identify Rating Levels and Rating Scales
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism,quan lan,quang ninh,ecology,ecotourism,minh chau,van don,geography,geographical basis,tourism development,science
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
of the islanders. Therefore, this indicator will be divided into two sub-indicators:
a1. Natural tourism attractiveness a2. Cultural tourism attractiveness
b. Tourist capacity
The two island communes in Quan Lan have different capacities to receive tourists. Minh Chau Commune is home to many standard hotels and resorts, attracting high-income domestic and international tourists. Meanwhile, Quan Lan Commune has many motels mainly built and operated by local people, so the scale and quality are not high, and will be suitable for ordinary tourists such as students.
c. Time of exploitation of Quan Lan Island Commune:
Quan Lan tourism is seasonal due to weather and climate conditions and festivals only take place on certain days of the year, specifically in spring. In Quan Lan commune, the period from April to June and from September to November is considered the best time to visit Quan Lan because the cultural tourism activities are mainly associated with festivals taking place during this time.
Minh Chau island commune:
Tourism exploitation time is all year round, because this is a place with a number of tourist attractions with diverse ecosystems such as Bai Tu Long National Park Research Center, Tram forest, Turtle Laying Beach, so besides coming to the beach for tourism and vacation in the summer, Minh Chau will attract research groups to come for tourism combined with research at other times of the year.
d. Sustainability
The sustainability of ecotourism sites in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes depends on the sensitivity of the ecosystems to climate changes.
landscape. In general, these tourist destinations have a fairly high level of sustainability, because they are natural ecosystems, planned and protected. However, if a large number of tourists gather at certain times, it can exceed the carrying capacity and affect the sustainability of the environment (polluted beaches, damaged trees, animals moving away from their habitats, etc.), then the sustainability of the above ecosystems (natural ecosystems, human ecosystems) will also be affected and become less sustainable.
e. Location and accessibility
Both island communes have ports to take tourists to visit from Van Don wharf:
- Quan Lan – Van Don traffic route:
Phuc Thinh – Viet Anh high-speed boat and Quang Minh high-speed boat, depart at 8am and 2pm from Van Don to Quan Lan, and at 7am and 1pm from Quan Lan to Van Don. There are also wooden boats departing at 7am and 1pm.
- Van Don - Minh Chau traffic route:
Chung Huong high-speed train, Minh Chau train, morning 7:30 and afternoon 13:30 from Van Don to Minh Chau, morning 6:30 and afternoon 13:00 from Minh Chau to Van Don.
f. Infrastructure
Despite receiving investment attention, the issue of infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism on Quan Lan Island is still an issue that needs to be resolved because it has a direct impact on the implementation of ecotourism activities. The minimum conditions for serving tourists such as accommodation, electricity, water, communication, especially medical services, and security work need to be given top priority. Ecotourism spots in Minh Chau commune are assessed to have better infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism because there are quite complete and synchronous conditions for serving tourists, meeting many needs of domestic and foreign tourists.
3.2.1.4. Determine assessment levels and assessment scales
Corresponding to the levels of each criterion, the index is the score of those levels in the order of 4, 3, 2, 1 decreasing according to the standard of each level: very attractive (4), attractive (3), average (2), less attractive (1).
3.2.1.5. Determining the coefficients of the criteria
For the assessment of DLST in the two communes of Quan Lan and Minh Chau islands, the students added evaluation coefficients to show the importance of the criteria and indicators as follows:
Coefficient 3 with criteria: Attractiveness, Exploitation time. These are the 2 most important criteria for attracting tourists to tourism in general and eco-tourism in particular, so they have the highest coefficient.
Coefficient 2 with criteria: Capacity, Infrastructure, Location and accessibility . Because the assessment area is an island commune of Van Don district, the above criteria are selected by the author with appropriate coefficients at the average level.
Coefficient 1 with criteria: Sustainability. Quan Lan has natural and human-made ecotourism sites, with high biodiversity and little impact from local human factors. Most of the ecotourism sites are still wild, so they are highly sustainable.
3.2.1.6. Results of DLST assessment on Quan Lan island
a. Assessment of the potential for natural tourism development
For Minh Chau commune:
+ Natural tourism attractiveness is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined as average (2 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of Capacity criterion is 2 x 2 = 4.
+ Exploitation time is long (4 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Exploitation time criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is assessed as good (3 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 3 x 2 = 6 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Minh Chau commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 4 + 12 + 4 + 4 + 6 = 42 points
Similar assessment for Quan Lan commune, we have the following table:
Table 3.3: Assessment of the potential for natural ecotourism development in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of self-tourismof course
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
CommuneMinh Chau
12
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
42/52
Quan CommuneLan
6
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
33/52
b. Assessment of the potential for humanistic tourism development
For Quan Lan commune:
+ The attractiveness of human tourism is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined to be large (3 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Capacity criterion is 3 x 2 = 6.
+ Mining time is average (3 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Mining time criterion is 3 x 3 = 9.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points.
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is rated as average (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Quan Lan commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 6 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 4 = 36 points.
Similar assessment with Minh Chau commune we have the following table:
Table 3.4: Assessment of the potential for developing humanistic eco-tourism in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of human tourismliterature
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Quan CommuneLan
12
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
39/52
Minh CommuneChau
6
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
36/52
Basically, both Minh Chau and Quan Lan localities have quite favorable conditions for developing ecotourism. However, Quan Lan commune has more advantages to develop ecotourism in a humanistic direction, because this is an area with many famous historical relics such as Quan Lan Communal House, Quan Lan Pagoda, Temple worshiping the hero Tran Khanh Du, ... along with local festivals held annually such as the wind praying ceremony (March 15), Quan Lan festival (June 10-19); due to its location near the port and long exploitation time, the beaches in Quan Lan commune (especially Quan Lan beach) are no longer hygienic and clean to ensure the needs of tourists coming to relax and swim; this is also an area with many beautiful landscapes such as Got Beo wind pass, Ong Phong head, Voi Voi cave, but the ability to access these places is still very limited (dirt hill road, lots of gravel and rocks), especially during rainy and windy times; In addition, other natural resources such as mangrove forests and sea worms have not been really exploited for tourism purposes and ecotourism development. On the contrary, Minh Chau commune has more advantages in developing ecotourism in the direction of natural tourism, this is an area with diverse ecosystems such as at Rua De Beach, Bai Tu Long National Park Conservation Center...; Minh Chau beach is highly appreciated for its natural beauty and cleanliness, ranked in the top ten most beautiful beaches in Vietnam; Minh Chau commune is also home to Tram forest with a large area and a purity of up to 90%, suitable for building bridges through the forest (a very effective type of natural ecotourism currently applied by many countries) for tourists to sightsee, as well as for the purpose of studying and researching.
Figure 3.1: Thenmala Forest Bridge (India) Source: https://www.thenmalaecotourism.com/(August 21, 2019)
3.2.2. Using SWOT matrix to evaluate Quan Lan island tourism
General assessment of current tourism activities of Quan Lan island is shown through the following SWOT matrix:
Table 3.5: SWOT matrix evaluating tourism activities on Quan Lan island
Internal agent
Strengths- There is a lot of potential for tourism development, especially natural ecotourism and humanistic ecotourism.- The unskilled labor force is relatively abundant.- resource environmentunpolluted, still
Weaknesses- Poorly developed infrastructure, especially traffic routes to tourist destinations on the island.- The team of professional staff is still weak.- Tourism products in general
quite wild, originalintact
general and DLST in particularalone is monotonous.
External agents
Opportunity- Tourism is a key industry in the socio-economic development strategy of the province and Van Don economic zone.- Quan Lan was selected as a pilot area for eco-tourism development within the framework of the green growth project between Quang Ninh province and the Japanese organization JICA.- The flow of tourists and especially ecotourism in the world tends toincreasing
Challenge- Weather and climate change abnormally.- Competition in tourism products is increasingly fierce, especially with other localities in the province such as Ha Long, Mong Cai...- Awareness of tourists, especially domestic tourists, about ecotourism and nature conservation is not high.
Through summary analysis using SWOT matrix we see that:
To exploit strengths and take advantage of opportunities, it is necessary to:
- Diversify products and service types (build more tourism routes aimed at specific needs of tourists: experiential tourism immersed in nature, spiritual cultural tourism...)
- Effective exploitation of resources and differentiated products (natural resources and human resources)
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: #0D0D0D; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -3pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Symbol, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:Wingdings; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:Cambria, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: #212121; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
Investment Situation in Non-Credit Services at Saigon Commercial Joint Stock Bank in the Period of 2015-2019 -
Exporting tourism services in Vietnam: Current situation and solutions - 2 -
Strengthening the attraction of foreign direct investment (FDI) into Nghe An province - 26

Source: Management Board of Industrial Parks and Foreign Investment of Quang Ninh Province
To achieve the results of attracting FDI investment in the tourism - service sector, Quang Ninh has known how to take advantage of the advantages and besides that, there are also specific difficulties as follows:
In terms of advantages, there are the following highlights:
- International economic integration is an inevitable trend of the world economy. Our country is actively participating in the process of international economic integration. Vietnam is now a member of many international economic organizations such as: ASEAN, APEC, ... especially we have joined the World Trade Organization WTO (November 7, 2006). Participating in deep and full international economic integration creates favorable conditions for the development of the economy in general and the tourism service industry in particular.
- The local infrastructure system is being upgraded and completed to suit the socio-economic development requirements of the province such as: National Highway 18A Hanoi
- Ha Long, the seaport system, and Bai Chay bridge are being urgently completed, making foreign investors confident in the development potential of Quang Ninh and boldly investing in the locality.
- Quang Ninh has many famous scenic spots, favorable for developing many types of tourism and attractive services. In addition, Quang Ninh also has many famous historical, cultural and artistic relics, creating the possibility of opening tourist routes both at sea and on land.
On the difficult side.
- State management: FDI enterprises in the tourism industry are increasingly growing in scale, many new enterprises are being established across districts and towns in the province, new types of tourism services are being developed in a variety of ways, creating many difficulties in the management of state agencies.
- For businesses: Administrative procedures have been gradually reformed but are still cumbersome, causing difficulties for businesses to go to many industries and levels to be granted operating licenses. Fierce competition between businesses participating in tourism business activities ...
* Agriculture - Forestry - Fishery sector
Favored by nature, Quang Ninh has also been highly appreciated by foreign investors, specifically the following foreign investment projects:
Table 2.7. FDI investment projects in the fields of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishery in the period
1990-2005
(as of December 2005 - only valid projects are counted)
Year
license
STT | Project name | Investment capital (USD) | |
1990 | 1 | Quang Ninh Seafood Export Company | 1,200,000 |
1997 | 2 | Halong Pearl LLC | 2,000,000 |
1999 | 3 | Taiheiyo Shinju Co., Ltd. - Vietnam | 1,500,000 |
4 | Centre Way (Holdings) Limited Vietnam Company | 1,500,000 | |
5 | Hong Hai Scientific Research Development Co., Ltd. | 500,000 | |
2000 | 6 | Oriental Pearl Company Limited | 500,000 |
2001 | 7 | G&A Aquaculture Corporation | 1,800,000 |
8 | Pearl farming business cooperation agreement | 1,500,000 | |
2003 | 9 | Business Cooperation on Growing Bamboo Shoots for Export | 5,000,000 |
10 | Thanh Phong Seafood Import Export Company | 1,500,000 | |
2005 | 11 | Vica-Aquatech Joint Venture Company | 4,500,000 |
12 | HH Dai Hai Company | 500,000 | |
13 | Viet Can Seafood World Company Limited | 1,000,000 | |
14 | Monosex tilapia farming business cooperation | 475,000 | |
Total | 23,475,000 | ||
Source: Management Board of Industrial Parks and Foreign Investment of Quang Ninh Province
By the end of 2005, the province had attracted 14 investment projects in the agriculture, forestry and fishery sector with a total investment capital of 23,475,000 USD, accounting for 18.42% of the number of projects and 4.75% of the total FDI capital of the province. The main objective of the projects is to cultivate and process aquatic products for export, including shrimp, clams, fish, pearls , etc. This is an industry with a positive growth rate and high export value. Agriculture and forestry currently has only one effective project (Business Cooperation on Growing Bamboo Shoots for Export) with a total investment capital of 5,000,000 USD. From the results of attracting FDI capital into the agriculture, forestry and fishery sector, we can see that it is not commensurate with the potential and strengths of Quang Ninh.
Quang Ninh has advantages in attracting FDI in the agriculture, forestry and fishery sector such as: Rich and diverse resources are widely distributed throughout the province, suitable climate conditions are suitable for many types of crops and livestock to grow, there is still a lot of land potential, can invest in exploitation and production. The labor force in rural areas and non-agricultural areas is still very large, enough conditions to provide labor for projects. Investment projects in Quang Ninh will be very convenient in exporting products because Quang Ninh has Mong Cai border gate connecting with Guangxi province of China. The central and local governments always give the most preferential policies to projects that solve a lot of labor and protect the environment.
Difficulties: Aquaculture and exploitation must be associated with environmental protection in Ha Long Bay. This is a sensitive issue because the aquaculture process will release pollutants into the environment to water sources. The starting point of the agricultural production industry is still low, production is self-sufficient, the growth rate is slow. Large-scale concentrated production areas, specialized and intensive areas have not been formed. There is still a lot of fallow land. The rural processing and service industry system has not been formed, agricultural products have not been industrially processed, so the value of goods is low.
2.2.4. Forms of foreign direct investment in Quang Ninh
According to the provisions of the Law on Foreign Investment, foreign investors investing in Vietnam must implement one of three forms: Joint venture enterprises, 100% foreign-invested enterprises and business cooperation contracts. This section will clarify the proportion of foreign direct investment forms in the period 1991 - 2005, the trend of fluctuation in the proportion of foreign direct investment forms over the years and the situation of conversion of foreign direct investment forms.
Although according to the Foreign Investment Law, all three forms of investment are equal, in reality, foreign direct investment activities in Vietnam in general and Quang Ninh in particular, the proportions of these forms are very different. Table
2.7 shows the structure of foreign direct investment projects in Quang Ninh in the period 1991 - 2005 by investment form.
Table 2.8. Forms of foreign direct investment in the period 1991 - 2005 (only valid projects are counted)
Form
Project | Investment capital | |||
Project Number | Proportion (%) | Capital (USD) | Proportion (%) | |
Joint venture | 31 | 40.79 | 371.207.906 | 72.25 |
100% foreign invested capital | 29 | 38.16 | 91,510,300 | 17.81 |
Business Cooperation | 16 | 21.05 | 51,051,817 | 9.94 |
Total | 76 | 100.00 | 513.770.023 | 100.00 |
Source: Management Board of Industrial Parks and Foreign Investment of Quang Ninh Province
In terms of investment forms, joint ventures are the main form of foreign investment that Quang Ninh has attracted. By the end of 2005, the province had 31 out of 76 projects in the form of joint ventures, accounting for 40.79% of the total number of projects, with attracted investment capital of 371,207,906 USD, accounting for 72.25% of the total investment capital. In the form of 100%, Quang Ninh attracted 29 projects, accounting for 38.16% of the total number of projects, with 91,510,300 USD, accounting for 17.81%. In the form of business cooperation contracts, the number of projects attracted 16 projects, accounting for 21.05% of the total number of projects, with the total attracted capital of 51,051,817 USD, accounting for only 9.94%.
In general, we see that the joint venture form is the most popular form, accounting for a large proportion of investment capital, creating a difference compared to the other two forms. Although the number of projects established in the form of 100% foreign investment with a small scale of investment capital, in recent years there has been an increase in the proportion of investment projects. The form that is rarely chosen by foreign investors is the form of business cooperation contract, there is only one project in this form with a large total investment capital of 30,000,000 USD (Uong Thuong Coal Mining Business Cooperation Contract), the rest are mostly under 2 million USD.
2.2.5. Investment structure by location
After 15 years of attracting FDI capital, foreign direct investment attraction activities in Quang Ninh province have focused on 8 districts, towns and cities including: Ha Long City, Yen Hung, Uong Bi, Van Don, Mong Cai, Cam Pha, Dong Trieu.
Table 2.9. Results of FDI attraction by investment location in the period 1990-2005
(only valid projects)
Investment location
Project Number | Total capital attracted (USD) | |
Ha Long City | 34 | 256,936,736 |
Cam Pha Town | 07 | 50,906,100 |
Mong Cai Town | 17 | 118,829,830 |
Uong Bi Town | 09 | 38,000,000 |





