Factors affecting the brand value of the Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development of Vietnam - 1


MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING HO CHI MINH CITY UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS


TRAN THI THANH THUY


FACTORS AFFECTING THE BRAND VALUE OF THE BANK FOR AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT OF VIETNAM


Major: Finance - Banking Code: 60340201


MASTER'S THESIS IN ECONOMICS


SCIENTIFIC INSTRUCTOR: DR. LAI TIEN DINH


Ho Chi Minh City - 2013


COMMITMENT


I hereby certify that the thesis " Factors affecting the brand value of the Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development of Vietnam " is my own research work.

The data in this topic are collected and used honestly. The research results presented in this thesis are not copied from any thesis and have not been presented or published in any other research work before.


Thesis author


TRAN THI THANH THUY


INDEX

Cover Page Pledge Table of Contents

List of symbols and abbreviations List of tables

List of figures, graphs

INTRODUCTION 1

1. Reasons for choosing topic 1

2. Research objective 2

3. Research object and scope 2

4. Research method 3

5. Practical significance of topic 3

6. Topic structure 4

CHAPTER 1. THEORETICAL BASIS OF BRAND AND BRAND VALUE 5

1.1. BRAND OVERVIEW 5

1.1.1. Brand concept 5

1.1.2. Brand components 7

1.1.3. Brand characteristics 7

1.1.4. Bank brand 7

1.2. BRAND VALUE 9

1.2.1. Concept of brand value 9

1.2.2. Brand value assessment 10

1.2.2.1. Assessing brand value from a financial perspective 10

1.2.2.2. Evaluating brand value from the customer's perspective 11

1.2.3. Factors affecting brand value 11

1.2.3.1. Brand awareness 12

1.2.3.2. Brand association 13

1.2.3.3. Perceived quality 13

1.2.3.4. Brand loyalty 14

1.2.4. Benefits of brand value 16

1.2.4.1. Providing value to customers 16

1.2.4.2. Providing value to businesses 17

1.3. OVERVIEW OF RESEARCH RELATED TO BRAND VALUE 18

1.3.1. Research work of Kayaman and Arasli (2007) 18

1.3.2. Research work of Tong and Fawley (2009) 19

1.3.3. Research on brand equity measurement by Atilgan et al. (2009)

...................................................................................................................................20

1.3.4. Brand value measurement model of Nguyen Dinh Tho and Nguyen Thi Mai Trang (2002) 20

Chapter 1 21 Summary

CHAPTER 2. BUILDING A RESEARCH MODEL ON FACTORS AFFECTING AGRIBANK'S BRAND VALUE 22

2.1. OVERVIEW OF VIETNAM BANK FOR AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT 22

2.1.1. History of formation and development of Agribank 22

2.1.2. Agribank's business performance (2008 - 2012 period) ...23 2.1.3. Agribank's development orientation 25

2.2. BUILDING A RESEARCH MODEL ON FACTORS AFFECTING THE BRAND VALUE OF AGRIBANK 26

2.2.1. Reasons for choosing research model 26

2.2.2. Hypothesis on factors affecting Agribank's brand value.27

2.2.2.1. The relationship between brand awareness and brand value of Agribank 27

2.2.2.2. The relationship between brand association and brand value of Agribank 27

2.2.2.3. The relationship between perceived quality components and brand value of Agribank 28

2.2.2.4. The relationship between brand loyalty and Agribank brand value 28

2.3. RESEARCH METHODS 29

2.3.1. Qualitative research 30

2.3.2. Quantitative research 36

2.3.2.1. Research sample design 36

2.3.2.2. Data analysis method 37

.......................................................................................................... 39

CHAPTER 3. RESEARCH RESULTS 40

3.1. DATA ENCRYPTION 40

3.2. DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICAL ANALYSIS 40

3.2.1. Descriptive statistics of the survey subjects 40

3.2.2. Descriptive statistical analysis of independent and dependent variables 44

3.3. RELIABILITY TESTING OF SCALE 49

3.3.1. Scale evaluation using Cronbach Alpha reliability coefficient 49

3.2.2. Scale evaluation by exploratory factor analysis EFA 53

3.3. LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS 63

3.3.1. Pearson correlation coefficient test 63

3.3.2. Multiple regression analysis 65

3.4. HYPOTHESIS TESTING 69

Chapter 3 Summary 70

CHAPTER 4. CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS FOR SOME POLICIES TO IMPROVE AGRIBANK'S BRAND VALUE 72

4.1. CONCLUSIONS FROM THE STUDY 72

4.2. POLICY IMPLICATIONS 73

4.2.1. Enhance brand loyalty 73

4.2.2. Improving perceived quality 74

4.2.3. Enhance brand association 77

4.2.4. Enhance Agribank brand awareness 78

4.3. LIMITATIONS AND FURTHER RESEARCH DIRECTIONS 80

CONCLUSION 81

REFERENCES 82

APPENDIX 1

APPENDIX 2

APPENDIX 3

APPENDIX 4


LIST OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS


Abbreviations

Full English name

Full Vietnamese name

ABBank

An Binh Commercial Joint

Stock Bank

Joint Stock Commercial Bank

An Binh

ACB

Asia Commercial Bank

Joint Stock Commercial Bank

Asia

Agribank

Vietnam Bank for Agriculture

and Rural Development

Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development

Vietnam Rural Development

Citibank


Citi Bank

Eximbank

Vietnam Export Import Bank

Joint Stock Commercial Bank

Vietnam Import and Export

HDBank

Ho Chi Minh City Development Joint Stock

Commercial Bank

Ho Chi Minh City Development Joint Stock Commercial Bank

HSBC

The Hong Kong and Shanghai

Banking Corporation

Hong Kong and Bank

Shanghai

Sacombank

Saigon Trade Center

Commercial Joint Stock Bank

Joint Stock Commercial Bank

Saigon Thuong Tin

Sacombank-

SBS

Sacombank Securities

Company

Bank Securities Company

Saigon Thuong Tin goods

Sacomreal


Saigon Real Estate Joint Stock Company

Trust

Sacombank-

SBJ

Sacombank Jewelries

Company

Ngan Gold and Gemstone Company

Saigon Thuong Tin goods

Vietinbank

Vietnam Joint Stock

Commercial Bank for Industry and Trade

Vietnam Joint Stock Commercial Bank for Industry and Trade

Maybe you are interested!

Factors affecting the brand value of the Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development of Vietnam - 1


LIST OF TABLES


Table 2.1: Agribank's business performance in the period 2008-2012 Table 2.2: Research steps

Table 2.3. Scale after calibration

Table 3.1: Descriptive statistical results of independent variables Table 3.2: Descriptive statistical results of dependent variables

Table 3.3: Results of reliability assessment of factor scales Table 3.4: KMO and Bartlett tests for independent variables Table 3.5: Total variance extracted

Table 3.6: Rotated component matrix for independent variables

Table 3.7: Results of reliability assessment of factor scales after second factor analysis

Table 3.8: KMO and Bartlett test for dependent variables Table 3.9: Matrix of components for dependent variables Table 3.10: Total variance extracted for dependent variables

Table 3.11: Representative variables in the regression model


Table 3.13: Assessment of the suitability of the regression model

Table 3.14: ANOVA test of the goodness of fit of the regression model Table 3.15: Test of correlation coefficients of the regression model

Comment


Agree Privacy Policy *