Home / Sea And Island

Developing sea and island tourism in Bai Tu Long Bay, Quang Ninh province - 26

Area 3 : Cluster 7: Quan Lan - Minh Chau island and cluster 9: Ban Sen - Thang Loi island have more than 4 special terrain types, valuable and special for tourism development: Coastal terrain; tidal flats; flooded karst; caves, rocky mountains; forests;... The terrain score for these 2 clusters is assessed at a maximum of 4 points; Cluster 8 of the Area has only 1 special terrain type, the coast, and has 4 terrain types valuable for tourism development: Coast, tidal flats, forests, so these 2 tourism clusters are assessed at 3 points for the terrain diversity criterion.

- Assessment of climate resources : Based on the criteria of the number of days/year that can be used to develop tourism activities well.

In general, the climate of the entire Bay is quite similar without differentiation, there is no big difference in climate between tourist areas, so the evaluation score of the clusters will be the same, which is the general evaluation score for the entire Bay. With its location in the tropical monsoon area, the climate is differentiated into 2 distinct seasons with the characteristics of a hot and humid island, with lots of rain, hot and humid summer, and cold and dry winter. The average temperature during the year is from 15 to 25°C. Therefore, the number of favorable days in the Bay to carry out tourism activities is the period of favorable weather for tourism exploitation every year. According to the current status of the exploitation season, the average is 5 to 6 months/year. According to the evaluation scale, the evaluation score for the clusters throughout the Bay is 3 points.

- Assessment of indigenous cultural resources (intangible human resources)

Based on data on the quantity, distribution and significance of intangible cultural resources in the areas applied to the assessment scale, the scores assigned to this criterion for the clusters are shown in Table 16.1.

Table 16.1. Results of assessment of the favorable level of tourism resources for marine and island ecotourism


Criteria

Creature

Terrain

Climate

Indigenous culture

Average score

Rating level

Criteria weight

0.40

0.30

0.20

0.10

Area 1

Cluster 1

2

4

3

2

2.8

ITL

Cluster 2

2

4

3

1

2.7

ITL

Cluster 3

3

3

3

2

2.9

TĐTL

Area 2

Cluster 4

4

4

3

1

3.5

RTL

Cluster 5

4

4

3

1

3.5

RTL

Cluster 6

4

4

3

1

3.5

RTL

Area 3

Cluster 7

3

4

3

3

3.3

TL

Cluster 8

4

3

3

2

3.3

TL

Cluster 9

4

4

3

2

3.6

RTL

Maybe you are interested!

2) Evaluate the convenience of resources for sightseeing tourism


- Evaluation of landscapes : Based on the diversity, uniqueness, density, and meaningful value of landscapes along with the quantity and value of historical and cultural relics of each cluster listed in Table 4.1, the evaluation results are as follows:

Area 1: Clusters 1 and 2 both have natural attractions such as mountains.

limestone, hills are quite unique, the temples and pagodas are valuable, however cluster 2 has more meaningful landscapes. The evaluation score is 3 points for cluster 2 and 2 points for cluster 1. For cluster 3, the number of natural landscapes and relics is more limited, so the evaluation score is 1 point.

Area 2: The clusters in the BTL National Park area have quite diverse and attractive natural landscapes, including limestone mountains, caves, forests, hills, and sandbanks, all of which are valuable; Ba Mun Island (Cluster 4) has a richer quantity and density of landscapes. However, this is a nature reserve, so historical and cultural relics in the clusters are very few. The assessment score for cluster 4 is 3 points, while clusters 5 and 6 both have 2 points.

Area 3: The number of natural landscapes in the clusters is very diverse, rich and attractive such as: Earth islands, limestone mountains, caves, hills, fields. However, for the landscapes with humanistic values ​​and historical and cultural relics in cluster 7 with high density with the architectural complex of communal houses, temples, shrines and Van Don Ancient Commercial Port ranked at the national level, the assessment score of cluster 7 is 4 points; cluster 8 also has diverse and attractive landscapes with a unique system of historical and revolutionary cultural relics and a national flagpole. The assessment score is 3 points; cluster 9 is somewhat more limited than the experts' assessment of 2 points.

- According to the evaluation criteria mentioned in section 3.5.2.1, the resources of terrain, biology, and climate serving the type of tourism can inherit the results of the evaluation criteria of the type of marine island ecotourism. Calculating the weight of the criteria is the result summarized in Table 16.2.

Table 16.2. Results of assessing the level of convenience of tourism resources for sightseeing tourism


Criteria

Win

scene

Terrain

Creature

Climate


Average score

Rating level

Criteria weight

0.40

0.30

0.20

0.10



Cluster 1

2

4

2

3

2.7

TĐTL

Area

Area 1

Cluster 2

3

4

2

3

3.1

TL


Cluster 3

1

3

3

3

2.2

ITL


Area 2

Cluster 4

3

4

4

3

3.5

RTL

Cluster 5

2

4

4

3

3.1

TL


Cluster 6

2

4

4

3

3.1

TL


Area 3

Cluster 7

4

4

3

3

3.7

RTL

Cluster 8

3

3

4

3

3.2

TL


Cluster 9

2

4

4

3

3.1

TL



nourish


3) Evaluate the convenience of resources for resort tourism


- Assessment of climate resources: For standard resort tourism

Climate criteria are quite important and are evaluated with a separate scale different from the climate criteria evaluation scale for other types of tourism. However, in the BTL Bay area, there is no differentiation or difference in climate between regions, so the evaluation score will be common for the entire Bay. According to the statistical results of hydrometeorological indicators in the bay area: the number of months with temperatures above 27 0 C is 3 months, humidity above 90% is 3 months, average wind speed is greater than 3 m/s, combined with the evaluation study of authors Nguyen Thu Nhung and Nguyen Khanh Van (2010). The evaluation score is 2 points for climate criteria for this type for all tourism clusters in the entire Bay.

- Assess the level of favorable resources : Terrain, landscapes serving resort tourism inherit the results of evaluating these criteria from the sightseeing type. Calculating the weight of the criteria of the type is the result of the synthesis in Table 16.3

Table 16.3. Results of assessing the level of favorableness of tourism resources for resort tourism

Criteria

Climate

Terrain

Sightseeing


Level of play

price

Criteria weight

0.50

0.33

0.17

Average score


Cluster 1

2

4

2

2.7

TL

Area

Area 1

Cluster 2

2

4

3

2.8

RTL


Cluster 3

2

3

1

2.2

ITL


Area 2

Cluster 4

2

4

3

2.8

RTL

Cluster 5

2

4

2

2.7

TL


Cluster 6

2

4

2

2.7

TL


Area 3

Cluster 7

2

4

4

3.0

RTL

Cluster 8

2

3

3

2.5

TĐTL


Cluster 9

2

4

2

2.7

TL


4) Evaluate the favorableness of resources for beach tourism

- Assessment of physical structure and beach capacity:

Area 1: Cluster 3 does not have beach resources so it is not evaluated for this type of tourism. Cluster 1 has 1 beach in Dong Xa area, however, the capacity is small, the bottom has many pebbles; Cluster 2 has 2 beaches, Viet My and Bai Dai, with quite large capacity (reaching 2,000 people/day), however, the bottom of the beaches still has a lot of sand and gravel. Based on the evaluation scale, the experts unanimously rated 1 point for cluster 1 and 3 points for cluster 2.

Area 2: Cluster 4 has no beach, cluster 5 has only a small beach with a capacity of

8,000 people/day, the bottom is quite smooth and firm; cluster 6 has 3 mini beaches, the total capacity in these areas is over 1,000 people/day with a sand and gravel bottom. Applying the rating scale, cluster 4 is rated 2 points; cluster 5 is rated 3 points.

Area 3: Cluster 9 has no beach resources; Cluster 7 and Cluster 8 both have famous beautiful beaches, with fine and firm sand bottoms, and a capacity of over 2,000 people/day. The scores for Cluster 7 and Cluster 8 are evaluated on a maximum scale of 4 points.

- Assessment of the oceanographic factors of the beach: Based on statistical data on the oceanographic factors of the beaches in the area and combined with the inheritance of previous studies.

Research on the evaluation of the hydrographic factors of the beach in BTL Bay by Nguyen Thu Nhung and Nguyen Khanh Van (2010), the evaluation results are summarized in Table 16.4

- Assessment of climate resources for sea bathing: This criterion is assessed separately, based on the number of months with an average temperature of 25 - 29 0 C and the number of hours of sunshine favorable for sea bathing. However, in reality, in the Bay area, this factor is less differentiated between regions, so the author asked for expert opinions to unify the general assessment score for the tourist clusters in the area. According to statistics from the hydrometeorological station, on average in the Bay area, there are 5 months with an average temperature of 25 - 29 0 C and an average of 180 hours of sunshine/month, so the general assessment score for this criterion for the clusters is 3 points. The results are summarized in Table 16.4.

Table 16.4. Results of assessing the level of favorableness of tourism resources for beach tourism

Criteria

CTVC and beach capacity

Climate

Oceanography


Average score

Rating level

Criteria weight

0.43

0.29

0.29


Cluster 1

1

3

3

2.2

ITL

Area

Area 1

Cluster 2

3

3

4

3.4

RTL


Cluster 3

-

-

-

-

-


Area 2

Cluster 4

-

-

-

-

-

Cluster 5

2

3

3

2.6

TĐTL


Cluster 6

2

3

3

2.6

TĐTL


Area 3

Cluster 7

4

3

4

3.8

RTL

Cluster 8

4

3

4

3.8

RTL


Cluster 9

-

-

-

-



5) Evaluate the favorableness of resources for cultural tourism

- Assessment of physical cultural tourism resources: Based on the density of physical cultural resources listed in Table 4.1 and their significance. Experts assess points for tourism clusters in Table 16.5.

- The criteria for evaluating intangible cultural resources and climate for cultural tourism inherit the results of evaluating these criteria from the type of marine and island ecotourism. The results are summarized in Table 16.5.

Table 16.5. Results of assessment of the favorable level of tourism resources for cultural tourism

Criteria

Physical humanities

Intangible humanities

Climate


Rating level


Average score

Criteria weight

0.50

0.33

0.17


Cluster 1

2

2

3

2.2

TL

Area

Area 1

Cluster 2

3

1

3

2.3

TL


Cluster 3

1

2

3

1.7

ITL


Area 2

Cluster 4

1

1

3

1.3

ITL

Cluster 5

1

1

3

1.3

ITL


Cluster 6

1

1

3

1.3

ITL


Area 3

Cluster 7

3

3

3

3.0

RTL

Cluster 8

2

2

3

2.2

TL


Cluster 9

2

2

3

2.2

TL


AREA, POPULATION

ADMINISTRATIVE UNITS OF VAN DON DISTRICT

Comment


Agree Privacy Policy *