Current Status of Organizing Activities to Build Safe Schools and Prevent Accidents and Injuries for Children in Kindergartens

The content " Estimated time and budget for implementing the plan to build a safe school and prevent accidents for children appropriately" was assessed at an average level of implementation, with managers and teachers rating it 2.24 points.

The content "Unifying the plan for PCTNTT for children " was assessed as having an average implementation level, with managers and teachers rating it 2.20 points.

The content " Discussing opinions of staff and teachers to propose measures to implement the plan to build a safe school and prevent accidents for children" is assessed as being implemented regularly, with managers and teachers giving it a score of 2.40.

Managers and teachers evaluated the content "Expected departments to implement and provide reasonable conditions for implementing the PCTNTT plan for children " at an average of 2.21 points.

These activities are all activities of managers and require managers in schools, in addition to being dedicated and responsible for their work, to have knowledge of management science. In addition to having a firm grasp of the actual situation of the school, they need to clearly understand the requirements for the development of preschool education and the physical development of preschool children to meet the requirements of society and the locality in the coming years. However, these contents are currently taken lightly by the management team in preschools.

2.4.2. Current status of organizing activities to build safe schools and prevent accidents and injuries for children in preschools

To study the current situation of organizing activities to build safe schools and prevent accidents for children, we used question number 10 (appendix) to survey target groups and the results are shown in table 2.11:

Table 2.11. Results of organizing activities to build safe schools and prevent accidents for children in preschools

Rating: 3= Regular; 2= Moderate; 1 = Not done

Organizing activities to build safe schools and PCTNTT for children

Level of implementation

Average

Often

through

Central

jar

Are not

perform

On building operating mechanism

school safety and child protection activities

54.0

13.7

32.3

2.22

Assign teachers and staff to support and help each other to build a safe school.

PCTNTT for children

52.8

13.0

34.2

2.19

Fostering knowledge on building safe schools and PCTNTT for children

Teachers and staff in school.

43.5

25.5

31.1

2.12

Disseminate the goals, contents and methods of building safe schools and PCTNTT for children to the whole community.

staff, teachers, employees

53.4

14.9

31.7

2.22

Assign responsibilities to each member, requirements to be achieved in school construction activities

safety, PCTNTT for children

55.3

20.5

24.2

2.31

Scientific organization of labor in the work of building safe schools,

PCTNTT for children.

50.9

20.5

28.6

2.22

Coordinate educational forces inside and outside the school to build safe schools.

PCTNTT for children

34.2

48.4

17.4

2.17

Maybe you are interested!

The results in Table 2.11 show that: In general, the activities of organizing the construction of safe schools and preventing accidents for children are all rated at an average level. In particular, activities such as knowledge training; disseminating goals, content, and methods for building safe schools and preventing accidents for children are rated at an average level by staff, teachers, and employees (2.22 points). Interviewing teachers, they said: Activities of knowledge training; disseminating goals, content, and methods for building safe schools and preventing accidents for children are regularly implemented according to the plan of the Department of Education and Training of Pho Yen town. However, teachers also said that currently, preschools have not regularly implemented knowledge training for teachers on building safe schools and preventing accidents for children. Therefore, this content has 13.7% rated average and 32.3% rated not implemented.

The content " Assigning responsibilities to each member, requirements to be achieved in activities to build safe schools, PCTNTT for children" was evaluated at an average level (2.31 points), some young teachers have not met the requirements on knowledge and skills in activities to build safe schools, PCTNTT for children.

The content of coordinating educational forces inside and outside the school to build safe schools and prevent child accidents has not been implemented regularly, the assessment score is at an average level (2.17 points). And the assignment of teachers and staff with different professional abilities to support and help each other in building safe schools and preventing child accidents, with 34.2% of opinions saying that it is not implemented. Thus, we see that the assignment of teachers or the creation of a mechanism for teachers and staff to facilitate and help each other in building safe schools and preventing child accidents has not yet created consensus and satisfaction from some teachers and staff. Therefore, the school's Board of Directors needs to consider, get opinions from staff, teachers and staff and create a good, close, united working environment in the group of teachers and staff to maximize their enthusiasm, creativity and sense of responsibility in their work.

The organization of " Coordinating educational forces inside and outside the school to build safe schools and prevent child abuse " was rated by managers and teachers at an average level (2.17 points). Currently, to build safe schools and prevent child abuse, it is necessary to have the coordination of educational forces to contribute human resources and finance to invest in building grass playgrounds and continue to plant more shade trees so that children have shade to play and participate in outdoor activities.

2.4.3. Current status of directing activities to build safe schools and prevent accidents for children in preschools

To learn about the current situation of directing activities to build safe schools and prevent accidents for children, we used question number 11 (appendix) to survey target groups and the results are shown in table 2.12:

Table 2.12. Results of directing activities to build safe schools and prevent accidents for children in preschools

Rating: 3 = Effective; 2= Average; 1 = Ineffective

Directing activities to build safe schools and prevent

anti-TNTT for children

Level of implementation

Average

Effective

Central

jar

Are not

effective

Work to direct the plan to build safe schools,

PCTNTT for the team

Management team

47.2

20.5

32.3

2.15

Work to direct the plan to build safe schools,

PCTNTT for the team

teachers

44.7

21.7

33.5

2.11

Directing the construction of safe schools and PCTNTT

for staff

51.6

23.6

24.8

2.27

Directing the construction of safe schools and PCTNTT for participants

school child care

58.4

14.9

26.7

2.32

The results in Table 2.12 show that: After the plan has been developed, the direction of building a safe school and preventing and combating natural disasters for the school year is one of the important contents. Although the team of managers, teachers and employees of the schools have grasped and understood the importance of the issue and have mastered the knowledge and practical skills of building a safe school and preventing natural disasters for children, without close management and direction, the plan will not be implemented effectively. In fact, in schools, the direction of implementing the plan to build a safe school and prevent and combat natural disasters for children has not been closely carried out to the management staff, and there is still overlap in work arrangement. Therefore, the content of " Directing the plan to build a safe school and preventing natural disasters for the team of managers" is implemented with average effectiveness (2.15 points).

The content of " Directing the construction of safe schools and preventing accidents for those involved in childcare in schools" was implemented with average effectiveness (2.32 points), of which 58.4% were average and 26.7% were rated ineffective.

The content of " Directing the plan to build safe schools, PCTNTT for teachers " and the content of " Directing the plan to build safe schools, PCTNTT for staff " were rated as averagely effective by managers, teachers and employees (from 2.11 to 2.27 points). Of which, 33.5% of managers, teachers and employees rated the content of " Directing the plan to build safe schools, PCTNTT for teachers " as ineffective. We interviewed teachers at kindergartens, they said: Managers have not directed teachers to train in training courses on skills to participate and coordinate well between forces inside and outside the school in activities to build safe schools, PCTNTT for children. Managers have not directed to increase training for teachers to integrate PCTNTT education content for children into activities at kindergartens.

Researching the websites of current kindergartens, we found that the websites are still sketchy, and the school managers have not yet set up a section.

Build a safe school on the Website so that teachers and staff can regularly update information on building a safe school to prevent accidents and injuries for children.

Thus, the direction of the team of managers, teachers, employees and those involved in childcare in preschools is sometimes not really close. Therefore, school principals need to consider, get opinions from staff, teachers, employees and adjust management methods promptly on the basis of management science to maximize their enthusiasm, creativity and sense of responsibility in their work.

2.4.4. Current status of inspection and evaluation of results of accident and injury prevention activities for children in preschools

To learn about the current situation of directing activities to build safe schools and prevent accidents for children, we used question number 12 (appendix) to survey target groups and the results are shown in table 2.13:

Table 2.13. Results of inspection and evaluation of teachers and staff in activities of building safe schools and preventing accidents for children in preschools

Rating: 3= Good; 2= Average; 1= Poor

Inspection and evaluation of school safety construction activities and prevention of accidents and injuries for children

Level of implementation

Average

Good

Central

jar

Weak

Regulations on standards for performance assessment and testing

building safe schools

safety, PCTNTT for children.

50.3

19.9

29.8

2.20

Monitor and check activities

school safety and child protection activities

57.1

15.5

27.3

2.30

Inspection and evaluation of school safety construction activities and prevention of accidents and injuries for children

Level of implementation

Average

Good

Central

jar

Weak

Check your self-improvement

Teacher and staff expertise

46.0

21.7

32.3

2.14

Regular assessment of school construction activities

safety, PCTNTT for children

56.5

13.7

29.8

2.27

Periodic assessment of school construction activities

safety, PCTNTT for children

49.1

18.6

32.3

2.17

Evaluation through contest and lecture activities of teachers and staff on building safe schools,

PCTNTT for children.

53.8

24.0

22.2

2.32

Evaluate teachers and employees through

collective trust

55.3

13.7

31.1

2.24

Ensure accuracy and objectivity in the process of checking and evaluating safe school construction activities.

PCTNTT for children.

53.4

26.7

19.9

2.34

Adjusting activities to build safe schools and PCTNTT for children after inspection

check, evaluate

45.3

18.6

36.0

2.09

The survey results in Table 2.13 show that: The content of " Periodic assessment of safe school construction activities, PCTNTT for children" and the content of " Ensuring accuracy and objectivity in the process of checking and assessing safe school construction activities, PCTNTT for children "; " Regulations on standards for checking and assessing safe school construction activities, PCTNTT for children " are assessed by managers, teachers and employees at an average level of implementation (assessment score from 2.17 to 2.20 points). Currently, schools have not ensured objectivity and accuracy in the process of checking and evaluating the construction of safe schools and PCTNTT for children when implementing the checklist according to Circular 13/2010/TT-BGDDT, dated April 15, 2010 of the Ministry of Education and Training on promulgating regulations on building safe schools, preventing accidents and injuries in preschools and Decree 80/2017/ND-CP regulating a safe, healthy, friendly educational environment, preventing and combating school violence.

The content " Evaluating teachers and staff through the trust of the collective " has an average implementation level (2.24 points). Interviewing the Principal of Ba Hang Kindergarten, the comrade said: " Evaluating teachers and staff through the trust of the collective allows school managers to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of teachers and staff in building safe schools and preventing child abuse. However, currently, the Board of Directors of some schools still take this work lightly, and some teachers and staff lack responsibility in their work."

The content of " Monitoring and inspecting the construction of safe schools and PCTNTT for children" was implemented at an average level (2.30 points), of which 15.5% rated it average and 27.5% rated it at a weak/poor level.

The content of " Checking the professional self-improvement of teachers and employees " was implemented at an average level (2.14 points), of which 21.7% rated it average and 32.3% rated it at a weak/poor level. Thus, teachers and employees have not regularly conducted professional self-improvement on building safe schools and preventing and combating natural disasters.

Comment