Correlation Chart Between Inflation Fluctuation and Loan-to-Assets Dispersion


No. Country ARCH

(p)

GARCH

(q)

No. Country ARCH

(p)

GARCH

(q)

8 Laos 2 18 Taiwan 2

9 Malaysia 1 1 19 Indonesia 2

10 Sri Lanka 1

To visualize the relationship between inflation volatility and the variance in the loan-to-asset ratio. The graph in Figure 3.2 depicts the variation in inflation volatility and the dispersion of the loan-to-asset ratio. We see that there is a negative correlation between inflation volatility and the dispersion of the loan-to-asset ratio of banks. Although these figures provide an intuitive evidence of a negative correlation between inflation volatility and the cross-sectional dispersion of the loan-to-asset ratio of banks. However, banks in a country may be exposed to specific shocks with country-specific characteristics, so formal empirical research is needed before drawing conclusions about this correlation. Furthermore, in addition to country-level fixed effects, we must consider the impact of many other factors that may distort the observations.


Figure 3.2: Correlation chart between inflation fluctuations and dispersion of loan/total asset ratio


3.2.2.3 Control variables group

Control variables are variables that indicate a unique characteristic that are included in the model to reduce any impact that may confound other factors or the interpretation of the results of the study. Control variables also have a potential impact on the dependent variable like the independent variable, but that impact is not what we are interested in. In addition, the control variable is included in the analytical model because we cannot ignore its impact when considering the effects of the independent variable. Similar to Mustafa, Bing (2016), the group of control variables included in the model includes other factors that change the macro environment:

Inflation: collected from WorldBank, inflation is also expected to have a negative impact on the dispersion of loan to total assets ratio.

GDP growth rate, GDP: The impact of GDP growth ( GDP) on the dispersion of the loan/asset ratio is still unclear. For example, in a growing economy, if new credit increases steadily across all banks, the dispersion of the loan/asset ratio will not change. However, if new credit is expanded by certain banks, the impact on dispersion will be in the same direction because the GDP growth rate changes over time.

The dummy variable dumFC takes the value of 1 if year t is greater than 2007. The inclusion of this dummy variable in the model is intended to test whether the dispersion of loan-to-asset ratios has changed after the financial crisis. The intercept is expected to be positive because money was injected into financial markets after the financial crisis. Conversely, it can also be argued that the expectation is in the opposite direction, because banks restricted lending during the crisis despite the efforts of the central bank and the government.

Interaction variable between financial crisis dummy and inflation volatility


( dumFC*h ) shows that the correlation between inflation volatility has changed after the financial crisis. The negative (positive) coefficient shows that after the financial crisis, the negative effect of volatility on bank resource allocation has increased (weakened).

Stock market volatility ( Vol Stock ) and oil price volatility ( Vol Oil ) are also measured by applying the ARCH/GARCH method. To estimate stock market volatility, the study collects monthly data of representative stock market indices in each country from Datastream and oil price volatility is measured based on West Taxas Intermediate oil prices from the IMF. Although it can be expected that stock market volatility will have a positive impact on the dispersion of bank loans, this impact can also be the opposite. For example, if banks extend credit to companies with good quality investment opportunities even though these companies are unable to raise finance during the period of stock market volatility, the dispersion of banks' loan/fund ratio will widen. However, if stock market volatility is a signal of overall financial market instability, then loan dispersion will be reduced, as banks tend to behave conservatively in extending loans during volatile periods. The impact of oil price volatility on the dependent variable is expected to be in the opposite direction, as increased oil price volatility implies increased macroeconomic uncertainty leading to conservative lending behavior by banks.

The average risk of the banking sector is the volatility of the profitability of banks in the same country, which is calculated from the standard deviation of the ratio of net income to total assets of the banks in the data set. The paper expects the average risk of the bank to have a negative impact on the dispersion of the ratio of loans to total assets.

And finally, the average banking industry return is calculated as an average


for banks in the dataset and is expected to have a positive impact on banks' loan allocation efficiency.

Overall, the inclusion of control variables should not affect the expected sign and significance of the coefficient on inflation volatility, þ 1 , reflecting the reversible effects of inflation volatility on bank resource allocation. Note also that the extended model includes annual dummy variables, i.year , capturing residual shocks that may affect the correlation.


Table 3.3 presents a summary of variable descriptions, definitions of variables used in the empirical analysis, along with expected signs of independent variables affecting the dispersion of loan-to-total-assets ratio of banks.

29


Table 3.3: Variable description, definition and data source


Group Variable Name Definition Data Source Expected Sign

Dependent variable Disp ( Loans ) Variance of the ratio of loans to total assets of the firms

Bankscope and

j,t TA

banks in the same country

Datastream


j ,t Inflation volatility is measured by the conditional variance

from ARCH/GARCH estimates of the monthly consumer price index

IMF -

Inflation Worldbank

Indicators

GDP GDP growth rate Worldbank

-


+/-

Independent variable


dumFC Equals 1 if year t is greater than 2007

Indicators


+/-

dumFC*h Interaction variable of dumFC and j ,t +/-

Vol Stock Stock market volatility is measured by the conditional variance from the ARCH/GARCH estimate of the stock market index

Vol Oil Oil price volatility measured by the conditional variance from the ARCH/GARCH estimate of the WTI oil price

Data stream +/-


IMF -

30


In addition, before estimating, we consider the phenomenon of multicollinearity between independent variables. Table 3.4 presents the pairwise correlation coefficients between the variables included in the model. The condition for assessing the absence of multicollinearity between independent variables is that the correlation coefficients must not exceed 0.8 and be statistically significant.

The results show that the banking industry risk variable and the banking industry profit variable are completely correlated at the 1% significance level. Therefore, when regressing using the FE model, the banking industry risk variable is eliminated. In addition, the other independent variables in the model do not have any correlation higher than 0.8, meaning that multicollinearity cannot occur.

Additionally, to reduce the impact of outliers, we excluded 2.5% of the outliers. The remaining observations in the study sample are the residual values.

31


Table 3.4: Correlation coefficient matrix

With the symbols * , ** , and *** representing the 10%, 5%, and 1% significance levels, respectively.

Variable name

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1. Proportional dispersion for

1.0000










get a loan











2. Inflation fluctuations

-0.0881

1.0000









3. Inflation

-0.0782

0.0106

1.0000








4. GDP growth

5. Financial crisis

0.0232

-0.1049 *

0.0060

0.1519 ***

-0.1755 ***

-0.1248 **

1.0000

-0.1527 ***


1.0000






6. Inflation fluctuations after

-0.0865

-0.0865

0.0932 ***

-0.0117

0.2061

1.0000





financial crisis

7. Market fluctuations


-0.1472 **


0.0277


0.1769 ***


-0.0441


0.0642


0.0155


1.0000




stock

8. Oil price fluctuations


-0.0449


0.0175


0.0931


-0.1197 **


0.1678 **


0.2607 ***


0.0054


1.0000



9. Banking industry risks

0.0143

-0.0056

-0.0170

-0.0335

0.0633

-0.0021

0.0296

0.0585

1.0000


10. Banking industry profits

-0.0143

0.0056

0.0170

0.0335

-0.0633

0.0021

-0.0296

-0.0585

-1.0000 ***

1.0000

row











Maybe you are interested!

Correlation Chart Between Inflation Fluctuation and Loan-to-Assets Dispersion


CHAPTER 4: RESEARCH RESULTS

In this chapter, regression results will be presented using three estimation methods. The model is estimated using FEM, REM and then instrumental variable model with GMM, IV-GMM estimation techniques to overcome endogeneity. All models allow for country specific fixed effects and the most extensive model of adding year effects. Robust standard errors are also presented in all tables of results.

The results show that there is a negative correlation between inflation volatility and cross-sectional dispersion of loan-to-asset ratio. These findings provide support for the hypothesis that volatility influences the efficient allocation of scarce bank funds.


4.1 Regression results using REM

Table 4.1: Regression results using REM method

With the symbols * , ** , and *** representing the 10%, 5%, and 1% significance levels, respectively. The standard deviation is placed in parentheses.



(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

h

-0.054621 ***

-0.0547329 ***

-0.0548081 ***

-0.048062 ***


(0.0062821)

(0.0058209)

(0.0060634)

(0.0065763)

Inflation


-0.000074

-0.000059

0.0000207



(0.003496)

(0.000349)

(0.003264)

GPD



0.0000789

0.000219




(0.0004065)

(0.000432)

dumFC




0.0040325





(0.0056153)

dumFC*h





Volume Stock





Oil Volume





Bank Risk





Bank Return





i.year





Country

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Cons

0.0207991 ***

0.0210531 ***

0.0205542 ***

0.0170831 ***


(0.0010182)

(0.0044867)

(0.0050174)

(0.0055164)

N

302

301

300

300

R 20.0078

0.00098

0.0099

0.0271

Column 1 describes the simplest model when inflation volatility is the only explanatory variable.

Comment


Agree Privacy Policy *