Central Bank Management of Commercial Banks' Equity



Equity capital has important psychological value. If depositors and borrowers believe that a bank has enough capital to weather certain difficulties, they will not withdraw their deposits en masse and borrowers will be more likely to meet their obligations.

Fourth , equity helps regulate bank operations. With the view of limiting risks for depositors, many bank operations are regulated in close relation to equity. For example, the scale of deposit mobilization is calculated in proportion to equity, the maximum loan scale for one or a group of customers, the right to invest in company securities, the number of branches, the value of fixed assets, the portfolio of risky assets... are all calculated in proportion to equity. Therefore, the scale, structure and development of bank operations are regulated by equity in many countries. On the other hand, the equity structure has an important impact on the business performance of banks.

1.2.2. Central bank management of commercial banks' equity

1.2.2.1. Concept and management objectives of the central bank for the equity of commercial banks

Concept

Management is a popular and important concept. In the modern market economy, the state increasingly increases its role in managing economic activities to reduce the negative aspects of the market economy, and enhance the consistent operation of economic entities through various forms, tools, scopes, and levels. The management activities of the Central Bank for commercial banks are the process of implementing planning, organizing, leading, checking, inspecting, and supervising commercial banks to achieve the goals of monetary policy.

The central bank's management of commercial bank equity is essentially to determine and inspect and supervise the implementation of the scale and structure of bank equity to suit the requirements of capital safety and risk prevention for commercial banks, improving the business efficiency of commercial banks.



Management objectives

- To build a stable banking system, the Central Bank establishes capital requirements to ensure safety for banks, limit losses and protect depositors.

- The central bank's capital adequacy requirement is an important indicator to the public of a bank's reputation. The larger a bank's capital, the more confidence and security it creates for depositors.

- An important goal of equity management is to create a reasonable capital structure, limit the situation of virtual capital increase and bank acquisition. From the perspective of the management agency (the State Bank), a reasonable equity structure must ensure that the bank has enough equity to prevent risks in banking operations and ensure safety in banking operations. From the perspective of shareholders/bank owners, an equity structure is considered optimal when that capital ensures the implementation of the business model, brings maximum benefits on each capital, compensates for unexpected losses, and ensures capital safety ratios according to the provisions of law. The equity structure includes tier 1 capital and tier 2 capital, in which tier 1 capital management plays an important role because it has a great influence on the stable operation of the bank. Tier 1 capital management is the determination of the scale and structure of capital to meet the requirements of ensuring the safety of the banking system, protecting the interests of depositors, and enhancing the risk tolerance of credit institutions against market shocks. To protect depositors and build a stable banking system, the State Bank has established requirements for Tier 1 capital. This is an important indicator for the public to know about the reputation of the bank. Therefore, the requirement for commercial banks is to consider Tier 1 capital management as an important part of bank capital management. In addition, Tier 2 capital management requirements are extremely important to minimize virtual calculations of equity that commercial banks may make to meet the management requirements of the State Bank but do not reflect the true nature and scale of equity.



1.2.2.2. Legal basis for central bank management of equity capital of commercial banks

Practices and regulations of international financial institutions

In each country, the banking system always plays a particularly important role in promoting or restraining the development of the economy. Therefore, safety in operations is one of the top priorities of the banking system. To prevent risks in banking operations, a Committee on Banking Supervision was established by senior representatives of banking supervision agencies and the central banks of the G-10 developed countries - the Basel Committee (including the following countries: UK, France, Germany, USA, Netherlands, Canada, Belgium, Italy, Japan, Sweden). This Committee sets standards on operational safety as well as principles for supervising the implementation of those standards. In the global economy, countries have economic relationships and interests that affect each other, so the insecurity of any banking system has a certain impact on the financial stability of other countries. Therefore, the above standards are recommended to be applied to countries and become the common legal basis for central bank management of commercial banks' equity capital [13].

Currently, the international Basel capital treaty has three versions: Basel 1, Basel 2 and Basel 3. The latter version is the inheritance, supplement and overcome the limitations of the previous version. Basel 1 stopped at providing the most common international definition of bank capital, providing a minimum capital adequacy ratio of 8% for banks and referring to credit risk. Basel 2 still maintains CAR 8% but has overcome the limitations of Basel 1, referring to both operational risk and market risk in bank capital management while building three main pillars of capital adequacy. Basel 2 is currently widely applied in many countries around the world. Basel 3 provides new regulations on concepts and higher minimum standards (CAR 11.5%), along with a method of macroprudential supervision, which is considered a historic change in banking regulations, however, Basel 3 has only been implemented in a few countries [21]. However, it is also necessary to clearly see that capital requirements for commercial banks are increasingly being raised, which



This has a great impact on the capital needs of commercial banks when implementing capital safety compliance according to Basel. To be close to the actual capital at Vietnamese commercial banks and the pilot implementation milestone of Basel 2 from 2015, within the framework of the thesis, the author refers to Basel 2 as the general legal basis for the topic.

Accordingly, the central bank manages the equity of commercial banks based on the regulations on capital safety and risk prevention in Basel 2 with 3 main pillars:

Pillar One – Minimum Capital Requirements [13], [21], [43]

According to Basel 2 regulations, a financial institution is considered adequately capitalized when the minimum capital adequacy ratio (CAR) reaches at least 4% for tier 1 capital and 8% for tier 2 capital. The CAR ratio [37] is calculated according to the formula:

Bank Capital – Deductions

Capital Adequacy Ratio

out of bank capital

Minimum = Risk-adjusted assets 8%

Bank capital [13]: Bank capital includes tier 1 capital and tier 2 capital.

According to Basel 2, Bank capital is limited by a number of regulations:

Total Tier 2 capital included in the CAR ratio calculation must not exceed 100% of Tier 1 capital;

Secondary debt is up to 50% of Tier 1 capital;

General provision is maximum 1.25% of risk-weighted assets; Revaluation reserve is discounted 55%;

The remaining maturity of subordinated debt is at least 5 years; Bank capital does not include intangible capital.

Deductions from bank capital

Depending on the operating situation of the banking system in each country, deductions from bank capital are specifically regulated. In general, these amounts may include: commercial advantages, business losses, capital contributions, purchase of shares at other credit institutions, capital contributions, purchase of shares of affiliated companies, etc.

Risk Weighted Assets (RWA)

In addition to credit risk and market risk as regulated in Basel 1,



Basel 2 adds operational risk. Therefore, the calculation of RWA in Basel 2 is more complex than in Basel 1 and is unlikely to accurately assess capital adequacy.

- Credit risk [43], Basel 2 provides measurement methods:

+ Standardization method:

Risk-Adjusted Assets (RWA): = Assets * Risk Weight

Each type of asset will be assigned a risk weight. In Basel 1, the risk weight of assets is divided into 4 levels: 0%, 20%, 50% and 100% according to the risk level of each type of asset, without mentioning the credit rating. Basel 2 has overcome this drawback, not imposing a risk coefficient for each item but also depending on the credit rating of the creditor. In addition, another difference in Basel 2 is that debt is divided into 5 groups with weights of 0%, 20%, 50%, 100% and 150% respectively.

+Basic and advanced internal rating system (IRB) methods:

RWA = 12.5 * EAD * K

In there:

EAD: Exposure at Defalt – Total outstanding debt of the customer at the time the customer defaults.

K – Capital Required: The capital ratio required to cover unforeseen but still occurring RRTD cases.

With this method, Basel 2 provides a way to determine default, effective maturity, credit loss ratio, and from there calculate converted risk-weighted assets. This determines more accurately the minimum capital requirement for credit risk and at the same time differentiates the minimum capital requirement between loans for each subject.

- Operational risk , Basel 2 provides three ways to calculate minimum capital for this risk [18]:

+ The Basic Indicator Approach (BIA):

In this way, to calculate the minimum capital required to cover operational risk, the bank takes the average annual gross income of the last three years with positive income and multiplies it by 0.15 (this factor is prescribed by Basel 2). The average gross income is the net interest income plus the net non-interest income.



Profit is income before provisions are made, excluding profits and losses from securities trading, insurance and other extraordinary income.

K BIA = [ ∑ (GI 1….n * α) ] / n In which:

K BIA : cost of capital for the fundamental index approach

GI: average annual positive income over three years; n: Number of years with positive income over three years

α: equal to 0.15

+ The Standardised Approach (STA) – The Standardised Approach:

In this way, banking activities are divided into 8 business areas. The bank will calculate the minimum capital required for each business area by multiplying the net income from that area by the corresponding coefficients below. The minimum capital for the entire bank's operating risk will be equal to the sum of the minimum capital for each business area.

Table 1.2: Coefficients in the standardized approach


Business Field

Coefficient β (%)

Corporate Finance

18

Buying and selling activities

18

Retail banking operations

12

Commercial banking activities

15

Pay

18

Agent Services

15

Asset Management

12

Retail Broker

12

Maybe you are interested!

Central Bank Management of Commercial Banks Equity

Source: Basel 2, commercial banking textbook 2013 (National Economics University)

The total capital required is calculated using the formula: K STA = { ∑ years 1-3 max [ ∑(GI 1-8 x β 1-8 ), 0] } / 3



In there:

K STA : total capital according to STA approach;

GI 1-8 : total annual income of a business sector;

β 1-8 : fixed ratio according to the table above;

+ Advanced Mesurement Aproach (AMA):

Under this approach, the minimum capital a bank needs to maintain is equivalent to the risk level that the bank has calculated using its internal operational risk measurement system. However, to apply this approach, a bank must ensure that it meets the qualitative and quantitative standards set by the Commission and must be accepted by the supervisory agency, so this approach is less popular than the STA approach.

- Market risk [43], Required capital is calculated by adding Tier 3 capital including short-term dependent debts for reserve purposes. Minimum required capital is calculated by the following methods:

+ Standardization method:

This approach considers each risk element including: interest rate risk, exchange rate risk, commodity risk and capital position risk. Specific regulations on how to calculate minimum capital for each type of risk are mentioned in Part A of the document “Adjustment of the Capital Standards Accord Regarding Market Risk” issued by the Commission in November 2005.

+ Internal model method:

When applying this method, the bank must be permitted by the supervisory authority and must meet the following requirements: a compatible, modern risk management system with full necessary data; qualified specialists equipped with skills to use complex models; the bank's model is assessed by the supervisory authority to be of good quality, has been tested for accuracy and reasonableness in measuring risk. This is a demanding method, so it is not



Many banks apply this method.

Pillar Two - Strengthening Monitoring Mechanisms [13]

Under this pillar, Basel 2 focuses on building a risk management system. The control testing process ensures that banks have enough capital to address all risks while also encouraging banks to control and manage risks through the development and use of better risk management techniques. There are four main principles covered under pillar two:

Principle 1 : Banks should have a process for assessing overall capital adequacy, managing the bank's risk profile and a strategy for maintaining capital levels. Key attributes of a robust process include [1]:

- Supervision of the board of directors and executive board;

- Estimate reasonable capital level;

- Comprehensive assessment of risks;

- Monitoring and reporting;

- Review and evaluate internal control inspection activities.

Principle 2 : Supervisors should review and evaluate banks’ internal capital adequacy assessment strategies and practices, as well as their ability to monitor and ensure compliance with capital ratios. Supervisors should take appropriate action if they disagree with the outcome of the supervisory process.

Principle 3 : Supervisors require banks to maintain capital adequacy ratios above the minimum adjusted capital ratio and must have the ability to require member units to maintain capital levels above the minimum.

Principle 4 : Supervisors should intervene at an early stage to prevent capital from falling below the minimum level, address the risk attributes of a particular bank, and take immediate action if capital cannot be maintained or restored.

Pillar Three – Market Discipline [1]

Comment


Agree Privacy Policy *