O3. The field of ecotourism and beach resorts has a fast growth rate.
T3. Vietnam's tourism industry still lacks development. development of linkages between departments, localities and businesses | |
O4. The tourism industry is encouraged for investment by the Government. | T4. Vietnam tourism is gradually losing its competitive advantage due to the lack of development resources. high concentration |
O5. Ho Chi Minh City - Dau Giay Expressway attracts tourists to the Province. Besides, Con Dao is the top of 26 islands for tourists and is on the list of destinations best in asia | T5. Small and medium-sized Vietnamese tourism businesses lack capital for investment and development. |
O6. Airlines also progress take many measures to attract customers |
Maybe you are interested!
-
Building a human resource development strategy at Ha Long Trade Union Tourism Company Limited until 2015 - 1 -
Identify Rating Levels and Rating Scales
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism,quan lan,quang ninh,ecology,ecotourism,minh chau,van don,geography,geographical basis,tourism development,science
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
of the islanders. Therefore, this indicator will be divided into two sub-indicators:
a1. Natural tourism attractiveness a2. Cultural tourism attractiveness
b. Tourist capacity
The two island communes in Quan Lan have different capacities to receive tourists. Minh Chau Commune is home to many standard hotels and resorts, attracting high-income domestic and international tourists. Meanwhile, Quan Lan Commune has many motels mainly built and operated by local people, so the scale and quality are not high, and will be suitable for ordinary tourists such as students.
c. Time of exploitation of Quan Lan Island Commune:
Quan Lan tourism is seasonal due to weather and climate conditions and festivals only take place on certain days of the year, specifically in spring. In Quan Lan commune, the period from April to June and from September to November is considered the best time to visit Quan Lan because the cultural tourism activities are mainly associated with festivals taking place during this time.
Minh Chau island commune:
Tourism exploitation time is all year round, because this is a place with a number of tourist attractions with diverse ecosystems such as Bai Tu Long National Park Research Center, Tram forest, Turtle Laying Beach, so besides coming to the beach for tourism and vacation in the summer, Minh Chau will attract research groups to come for tourism combined with research at other times of the year.
d. Sustainability
The sustainability of ecotourism sites in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes depends on the sensitivity of the ecosystems to climate changes.
landscape. In general, these tourist destinations have a fairly high level of sustainability, because they are natural ecosystems, planned and protected. However, if a large number of tourists gather at certain times, it can exceed the carrying capacity and affect the sustainability of the environment (polluted beaches, damaged trees, animals moving away from their habitats, etc.), then the sustainability of the above ecosystems (natural ecosystems, human ecosystems) will also be affected and become less sustainable.
e. Location and accessibility
Both island communes have ports to take tourists to visit from Van Don wharf:
- Quan Lan – Van Don traffic route:
Phuc Thinh – Viet Anh high-speed boat and Quang Minh high-speed boat, depart at 8am and 2pm from Van Don to Quan Lan, and at 7am and 1pm from Quan Lan to Van Don. There are also wooden boats departing at 7am and 1pm.
- Van Don - Minh Chau traffic route:
Chung Huong high-speed train, Minh Chau train, morning 7:30 and afternoon 13:30 from Van Don to Minh Chau, morning 6:30 and afternoon 13:00 from Minh Chau to Van Don.
f. Infrastructure
Despite receiving investment attention, the issue of infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism on Quan Lan Island is still an issue that needs to be resolved because it has a direct impact on the implementation of ecotourism activities. The minimum conditions for serving tourists such as accommodation, electricity, water, communication, especially medical services, and security work need to be given top priority. Ecotourism spots in Minh Chau commune are assessed to have better infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism because there are quite complete and synchronous conditions for serving tourists, meeting many needs of domestic and foreign tourists.
3.2.1.4. Determine assessment levels and assessment scales
Corresponding to the levels of each criterion, the index is the score of those levels in the order of 4, 3, 2, 1 decreasing according to the standard of each level: very attractive (4), attractive (3), average (2), less attractive (1).
3.2.1.5. Determining the coefficients of the criteria
For the assessment of DLST in the two communes of Quan Lan and Minh Chau islands, the students added evaluation coefficients to show the importance of the criteria and indicators as follows:
Coefficient 3 with criteria: Attractiveness, Exploitation time. These are the 2 most important criteria for attracting tourists to tourism in general and eco-tourism in particular, so they have the highest coefficient.
Coefficient 2 with criteria: Capacity, Infrastructure, Location and accessibility . Because the assessment area is an island commune of Van Don district, the above criteria are selected by the author with appropriate coefficients at the average level.
Coefficient 1 with criteria: Sustainability. Quan Lan has natural and human-made ecotourism sites, with high biodiversity and little impact from local human factors. Most of the ecotourism sites are still wild, so they are highly sustainable.
3.2.1.6. Results of DLST assessment on Quan Lan island
a. Assessment of the potential for natural tourism development
For Minh Chau commune:
+ Natural tourism attractiveness is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined as average (2 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of Capacity criterion is 2 x 2 = 4.
+ Exploitation time is long (4 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Exploitation time criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is assessed as good (3 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 3 x 2 = 6 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Minh Chau commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 4 + 12 + 4 + 4 + 6 = 42 points
Similar assessment for Quan Lan commune, we have the following table:
Table 3.3: Assessment of the potential for natural ecotourism development in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of self-tourismof course
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
CommuneMinh Chau
12
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
42/52
Quan CommuneLan
6
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
33/52
b. Assessment of the potential for humanistic tourism development
For Quan Lan commune:
+ The attractiveness of human tourism is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined to be large (3 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Capacity criterion is 3 x 2 = 6.
+ Mining time is average (3 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Mining time criterion is 3 x 3 = 9.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points.
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is rated as average (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Quan Lan commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 6 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 4 = 36 points.
Similar assessment with Minh Chau commune we have the following table:
Table 3.4: Assessment of the potential for developing humanistic eco-tourism in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of human tourismliterature
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Quan CommuneLan
12
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
39/52
Minh CommuneChau
6
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
36/52
Basically, both Minh Chau and Quan Lan localities have quite favorable conditions for developing ecotourism. However, Quan Lan commune has more advantages to develop ecotourism in a humanistic direction, because this is an area with many famous historical relics such as Quan Lan Communal House, Quan Lan Pagoda, Temple worshiping the hero Tran Khanh Du, ... along with local festivals held annually such as the wind praying ceremony (March 15), Quan Lan festival (June 10-19); due to its location near the port and long exploitation time, the beaches in Quan Lan commune (especially Quan Lan beach) are no longer hygienic and clean to ensure the needs of tourists coming to relax and swim; this is also an area with many beautiful landscapes such as Got Beo wind pass, Ong Phong head, Voi Voi cave, but the ability to access these places is still very limited (dirt hill road, lots of gravel and rocks), especially during rainy and windy times; In addition, other natural resources such as mangrove forests and sea worms have not been really exploited for tourism purposes and ecotourism development. On the contrary, Minh Chau commune has more advantages in developing ecotourism in the direction of natural tourism, this is an area with diverse ecosystems such as at Rua De Beach, Bai Tu Long National Park Conservation Center...; Minh Chau beach is highly appreciated for its natural beauty and cleanliness, ranked in the top ten most beautiful beaches in Vietnam; Minh Chau commune is also home to Tram forest with a large area and a purity of up to 90%, suitable for building bridges through the forest (a very effective type of natural ecotourism currently applied by many countries) for tourists to sightsee, as well as for the purpose of studying and researching.
Figure 3.1: Thenmala Forest Bridge (India) Source: https://www.thenmalaecotourism.com/(August 21, 2019)
3.2.2. Using SWOT matrix to evaluate Quan Lan island tourism
General assessment of current tourism activities of Quan Lan island is shown through the following SWOT matrix:
Table 3.5: SWOT matrix evaluating tourism activities on Quan Lan island
Internal agent
Strengths- There is a lot of potential for tourism development, especially natural ecotourism and humanistic ecotourism.- The unskilled labor force is relatively abundant.- resource environmentunpolluted, still
Weaknesses- Poorly developed infrastructure, especially traffic routes to tourist destinations on the island.- The team of professional staff is still weak.- Tourism products in general
quite wild, originalintact
general and DLST in particularalone is monotonous.
External agents
Opportunity- Tourism is a key industry in the socio-economic development strategy of the province and Van Don economic zone.- Quan Lan was selected as a pilot area for eco-tourism development within the framework of the green growth project between Quang Ninh province and the Japanese organization JICA.- The flow of tourists and especially ecotourism in the world tends toincreasing
Challenge- Weather and climate change abnormally.- Competition in tourism products is increasingly fierce, especially with other localities in the province such as Ha Long, Mong Cai...- Awareness of tourists, especially domestic tourists, about ecotourism and nature conservation is not high.
Through summary analysis using SWOT matrix we see that:
To exploit strengths and take advantage of opportunities, it is necessary to:
- Diversify products and service types (build more tourism routes aimed at specific needs of tourists: experiential tourism immersed in nature, spiritual cultural tourism...)
- Effective exploitation of resources and differentiated products (natural resources and human resources)
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: #0D0D0D; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -3pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Symbol, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:Wingdings; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:Cambria, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: #212121; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
Viewpoints on Building Solutions for Tourism Development in Ba Ria - Vung Tau -
Tourism development strategy of Ba Ria - Vung Tau province to 2020 - 15 -
Building a strategy to position teambuilding tourism products in the domestic market at Saigontourist Travel Service Company - 2

Source: Author's synthesis
3.2 Building a tourism development strategy in Ba Ria - Vung Tau
3.2.1 External Factor Evaluation (EFE) Matrix
To objectively assess the importance and classify external factors, the author created a form to request expert opinions according to Form No. 01, Appendix 3.1. Through synthesizing opinions on the importance and classification of external factors in Appendix 3.2, the author established an EFE matrix as shown in Table 3.2.
From the EFE matrix, the author synthesizes and gives a general conclusion with the total score of 2.85, showing that the tourism industry of Ba Ria - Vung Tau province is above average (average score is 2.5 points) in pursuing strategies to take advantage of opportunities from the environment as well as avoid threats from the outside. Therefore, building future strategies needs to focus on these strategies.
to further enhance the response capacity of the province's tourism industry to maximize opportunities and limit risks from external factors.
3.2.2 Internal Factor Evaluation (IFE) Matrix
To have more objective and accurate assessments of the strengths, weaknesses and their importance to the development of tourism in Ba Ria - Vung Tau province, the author has collected opinions from experts according to Form No. 02 in Appendix 3.3.
Based on the synthesis of comments and evaluation scores of experts on the level of importance and classification of internal factors in Appendix 3.4, the author has put them into the IFE matrix in Table 3.3. With a total score of 2.45, it shows that the tourism industry of Ba Ria - Vung Tau province is below average in terms of general internal strategy. Therefore, the strategy built in the future of the province's tourism industry needs to pay attention to maximizing its strengths and overcoming its weaknesses.
Table 3.2. Matrix of external factors that greatly affect the tourism industry of Ba Ria - Vung Tau province (EFE)
TT
External environmental factors | Industry Adaptability | |||
Level of importance | Classify | Point Number | ||
1 | O1. The trend of people traveling is increasing. | 0.1 | 3.0 | 0.3 |
2 | O2. Vietnam is the safest tourist destination | 0.1 | 4.0 | 0.4 |
3 | O3. The field of ecotourism and beach resorts has a fast growth rate. | 0.1 | 4.0 | 0.4 |
4 | O4. The tourism industry is encouraged for investment by the Government. | 0.05 | 3.0 | 0.15 |
5 | O5. Ho Chi Minh City - Dau Giay Expressway attracts tourists Province. In addition, Con Dao ranked first among 26 islands for tourists and was on the list of "Best destinations in Asia" | 0.1 | 4.0 | 0.4 |
6 | O6. Airlines also take many measures to attract customers. | 0.1 | 3.0 | 0.3 |
7 | T1. Natural disasters and epidemics always have the risk of re-emerging. | 0.1 | 2.0 | 0.2 |
8 | T2. Vietnam lacks tourism experts and tour guides. unprofessional | 0.15 | 2.0 | 0.3 |
9 | T3. Vietnam's tourism industry still lacks development in a cohesive manner. | 0.1 | 2.0 | 0.2 |
departments, localities and businesses | ||||
10 | T4. Vietnam tourism gradually loses competitive advantage due to development resources not highly concentrated | 0.05 | 2.0 | 0.1 |
11 | T5. Small and medium-sized Vietnamese tourism businesses lack capital. investment and development | 0.05 | 2.0 | 0.1 |
Total | 1.00 | 2.85 |
Source: Author's synthesis
Table 3. 3. Matrix of internal factors that greatly affect the tourism industry of Ba Ria - Vung Tau province (IFE)
TT
Internal environmental factors | Industry Adaptability | |||
Level of importance | Classify | Point Number | ||
1 | S1. The province has advantages in tourism development located in the key economic zone. south point | 0.05 | 2.0 | 0.1 |
2 | S2. The province has a favorable climate for year-round tourism exploitation. | 0.1 | 3 | 0.3 |
3 | S3. The province has rich and diverse natural tourism resources. | 0.15 | 3.0 | 0.45 |
4 | S4. The province has experience in organizing, managing and exploiting tourism. | 0.1 | 3.0 | 0.3 |
5 | S5. The province's tourism industry receives close attention. | 0.1 | 3.0 | 0.3 |
6
S6. The province's tourism industry attracts a large amount of investment capital. and abroad | 0.1 | 2.0 | 0.2 | |
7 | W1. The province's tourism industry has not yet developed commensurate with its potential. | 0.05 | 2.0 | 0.1 |
8 | W2. Weak quality of tourism human resources | 0.05 | 2.0 | 0.1 |
9 | W3. Underdeveloped transportation system | 0.1 | 2.0 | 0.2 |
10 | W4. Most small-scale support services, service products still poor | 0.1 | 2.0 | 0.2 |
11 | W5. The province's tourism industry has only developed in breadth. | 0.1 | 2.0 | 0.2 |
Total | 1.00 | 2.45 |
Source: Author's synthesis
3.2.3 SWOT Matrix
Through the analysis of the current status of strategy development and implementation of the tourism industry of Ba Ria - Vung Tau province presented above, the author built a SWOT matrix as shown in Table 3.4. The results of this SWOT matrix analysis of the tourism industry of the province have formed 4 strategic groups:
- S/O strategy group: With the meaning of promoting strengths to take advantage of opportunities, this group has proposed options:
+ Option 1: Market development strategy
+ Option 2: Strategy to diversify provincial tourism products
- S/T group strategy: With the meaning of using strengths to limit and avoid challenges, this group has the following proposed options:
+ Option 1: Growth strategy
- W/O strategy group: With the meaning of taking advantage of opportunities to overcome weaknesses, this group has proposed strategic options:
+ Option 1: Joint venture and association strategy
+ Option 2: Strategy for developing tourism human resources.
- W/T strategy group: With the meaning of minimizing weaknesses to avoid challenges, this group has proposed options:
+ Option 1: Internal growth strategy.
3.3 Choosing a tourism development strategy for Ba Ria - Vung Tau province
In order for Ba Ria - Vung Tau tourism industry to develop according to the viewpoints and achieve the set goals, we only choose feasible strategies that are central and urgent to orient the development of the province's tourism industry until 2025. Through analysis, the author proposes possible strategic options: Market development strategy, diversification strategy of provincial tourism products, joint venture and association strategy, internal growth strategy in which the development of tourism human resources is emphasized.
Table 3. 4. SWOT matrix of tourism industry in Ba Ria - Vung Tau province
SWOT
Strengths (S) S1. The province has advantages in tourism development located in the southern key economic zone. S2. The province has a favorable climate for year-round tourism exploitation. S3. The province has rich and diverse natural tourism resources. S4. The province has experience in organizing, managing and exploiting tourism. S5. Provincial tourism industry | Weakness (W) W1. The province's tourism industry has not yet developed commensurate with its potential. W2. Weak quality of tourism human resources W3. Underdeveloped transportation system W4. Most support services are small-scale, and service products are still poor. |
close attention S6. The province's tourism industry attracts a large amount of domestic and foreign investment capital. | W5. The province's tourism industry has only developed in breadth. | |
Opportunity (O) O1. The trend of people traveling is increasing. O2. Vietnam is the safest tourist destination O3. The field of ecotourism and beach resorts has a fast growth rate. O4. The tourism industry is encouraged for investment by the Government. O5. Ho Chi Minh City - Dau Giay Expressway attracts tourists to the Province. In addition, Con Dao is ranked first among 26 islands for tourists and is on the list of "Best destinations in Asia" O6. Airlines also take many measures to attract customers | 1. S/O strategies : using strengths to exploit market opportunities S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, S6 + O1, O2 O5, O6 → Market development strategy S1, S2, S3, S6 + O3, O5 → Provincial tourism product diversification strategy | 2. W/O strategies: improve weaknesses by exploiting market opportunities W1, W2, W4, W5 + O4, O5, O6 → Joint venture and association strategy W2, W5 + O4 → Tourism human resource development strategy |





