Test Results for Stationarity of Data Series

In 2009, both VN - Index and oil prices recovered significantly (VN-Index increased by 57 %, oil prices increased by nearly 40%), however, in 2010 and 2011, oil prices continued to grow impressively while stock prices decreased, going against the general trend of the world economy.

Phase 2012 – 2015:


Oil prices and VN-Index fluctuated in the same direction (increased ) in the first months of 2012, but then both decreased relatively , the result in 2013 was more positive when VN-Index increased by 22.2 % and oil prices increased by about 7 %. In 2014 , VN-Index and oil prices both had short-term price fluctuations, and oil prices decreased relatively ( about 30 %) compared to the beginning of the year , VN-Index was on the rise ( increased by 21 % in the first 9 months of the year ) also decreased slightly and increased by 7 % for the whole year . In 2015, oil prices continued to plummet, by December they had fallen 21.25% compared to the beginning of the year. The sharpest declines were in July (down 15% compared to the previous month) and August (down 15.8% compared to the previous month). VN-Index fell from 638.69 points (July 14) to a bottom of 526.93 points (August 24). After that, both oil prices and the stock market recovered, but from October they followed a downward trend.

In general, oil prices and Vn-Index moved in the same direction during the study period.

Maybe you are interested!


4.1.2.3. Loan interest rates and VN-Index

Test Results for Stationarity of Data Series

1200.00

25.00

1000.00

20.00

800.00

15.00

Point

600.00

%

10.00

400.00

200.00

5.00

0.00

0.00

VNI

LR

Chart 4.4. Relationship between lending interest rates and VN-Index


2006m1

2006m6

2006m11

2007m4

2007m9

2008m2

2008m7

2008m12

2009m5

2009m10

2010m3

2010m8

2011m1

2011m6

2011m11

2012m4

2012m9

2013m2

2013m7

2013m12

2014m5

2014m10

2015m3

2015m8

Source: Ho Chi Minh City Stock Exchange; IFS-IMF


Phase 2006 – 2008:


Lending interest rates in 2006 and 2007 were maintained at a stable level of 11.8%, the stock market made adjustments during this period, and there was almost no impact of interest rates on stock prices during this period. Right from the beginning of 2008, interest rates showed signs of increasing from commercial banks, and tight monetary policies to control inflation and stabilize the macro economy made interest rates even higher ( 19-20 %), and only after the third quarter did interest rates show signs of decreasing, but the VN-Index

still following the general downward trend of 40 %. This shows that although the interest rate is stable ,

The VN-Index is in the opposite direction, but interest rates are not the decisive factor in stock prices during this time.

Phase 2009 – 2011:


After the 2008 interest rate fluctuations , the 2009 interest rate has stabilized and decreased significantly compared to 2008 (fluctuating around 9%), at this time VN-Index also showed a recovery from

235.5 points (February 24) to 494.77 points at the end of the year ( up 57 %). However, in the middle of the year , interest rate tension reappeared , lending interest rates were pushed up (10.46%) and VN-Index tended to decrease during this period. In 2010 , interest rates were stable at (12-13%), VN-Index fluctuated within a narrow range . In 2011 , inflation showed signs of increasing , causing interest rates to increase again (18.09% in the second and third quarters), high capital costs combined with bank deposit interest rates increased again, causing cash flow into the stock market to decrease and VN-Index to decrease seriously.

Phase 2012 – 2015:


In 2012, thanks to the State Bank reducing the ceiling interest rate on deposits , lending interest rates also decreased (fluctuating from 12% - 13%), thanks to which the stock market recovered (VN-Index increased by 17% ) . In the face of the difficult economic situation , the State Bank also introduced many measures to cut interest rates, specifically lending interest rates were adjusted down by 3% - 4%, corresponding to VN -Index increasing by 22.2% (in 2013 ) and 13% (in 2014 ) compared to the previous year . In the first 7 months of 2015, lending interest rates were kept fixed at 7.23% and then decreased to 6.96% until the end of the year. During this period, interest rates fluctuated little and did not have much impact on the VN-Index.

In general, the reaction of Vn-Index to changes in interest rates is quite clear and in the opposite direction .


4.1.2.4. Inflation and VN-Index

1200.00

300.00

1000.00

250.00

800.00

200.00

Point

600.00

150.00 %

400.00

100.00

200.00

50.00

0.00

0.00

VNI

CPI

Chart 4.5. Relationship between inflation and VN-Index


2006m1

2006m6

2006m11

2007m4

2007m9

2008m2

2008m7

2008m12

2009m5

2009m10

2010m3

2010m8

2011m1

2011m6

2011m11

2012m4

2012m9

2013m2

2013m7

2013m12

2014m5

2014m10

2015m3

2015m8

Source: Ho Chi Minh City Stock Exchange; IFS-IMF


Phase 2006 – 2008:


Chart 4.6 shows that inflation had almost no impact on VN-Index during the period 2006 - 2007. From the beginning of 2008, the negative relationship was evident . The CPI gradually increased and peaked in September 2008 at 148.48, up 35% compared to the beginning of 2007 and 19 % compared to the beginning of 2008 , while the VN -Index plummeted 40% compared to the end of 2007 .

Phase 2009 – 2011:


In 2009 , the Government was determined to fight inflation and achieved positive results.

inflation at the end of 2009 was at 6.52%. The VN-Index's performance this year is contrary to

completely opposite to 2008 when inflation decreased and VN-Index increased by 57 % compared to the previous year . Since 2010 , inflationary pressure has increased again (up to 11.75 %) and lasted through 2011 , after reaching a peak of 23.02% in August 2011, inflation decelerated to 18.13% at the end of the year . Along with the continuous increase in inflation was the decrease of VN-Index (down 23% compared to the previous year ) .

Phase 2012 – 2015:


Macroeconomic factors showed signs of improvement in 2012 when inflation decreased significantly and VN-Index had an upward momentum, reaching its peak in May 2012 at 488.07 points, up 36.7 % compared to the beginning of the year . In 2013 , VN-Index continued to maintain its upward momentum ( up 22.2 % compared to 2012 ) and inflation was kept at 6.04%. After 2014 , the economy had positive changes, the consumer price index increased by only about 4.09 % compared to December 2013, inflation was well controlled, creating momentum for VN-Index to increase and peak at 640.75 points (September 3), the whole year increased by 7 % . In 2015 , inflation was at the lowest level in the past 14 years, CPI increased by 0.63% compared to 2014, although VN-Index in 2015 was still not very optimistic because it depended on many other factors at that time.

In general, the Vn-Index fluctuated in the opposite direction to the CPI during most of the study period.


4.1.2.5. Money supply and VN-Index

1200.00

7,000,000.00

1000.00

6,000,000.00

5,000,000.00

800.00

4,000,000.00

Point

600.00

Million Dong

3,000,000.00

400.00

2,000,000.00

200.00

1,000,000.00

0.00

0.00

VNI

M2

Chart 4.6. Relationship between money supply and VN-Index


2006m1

2006m7

2007m1

2007m7

2008m1

2008m7

2009m1

2009m7

2010m1

2010m7

2011m1

2011m7

2012m1

2012m7

2013m1

2013m7

2014m1

2014m7

2015m1

2015m7

Source: Ho Chi Minh City Stock Exchange; IFS-IMF


Phase 2006 – 2008:


The fluctuations in money supply and Vn-Index in 2006 were in the same direction .

increased, money supply increased by 24 % and Vn-Index doubled. Since 2007 , despite the Government's

The government has implemented many measures to control money supply, but the growth rate of money supply still tends to increase ( up 44 % ) and Vn-Index also increased at 23%. In 2008 , for

With the risk of high inflation , the State Bank has implemented a tight monetary policy .

In March 2008, the State Bank of Vietnam raised the required reserve ratio to 1% and issued VND20,300 billion in compulsory treasury bills , so the money supply during the year did not increase but fluctuated up and down by 2-3%; at the same time, the VN-Index during the year also decreased by 40 % .

Phase 2009 – 2011:


The fluctuations of the stock market in 2009 clearly show the influence of money supply on

In particular , the market had two strong adjustments: Vn-index recovered from 235.5 points (month

2) up to 512 points (June), this process is associated with the rapid increase in money supply in the economy due to the Government's stimulus policy; at the end of October, the Vn-index reversed and decreased from 624.1 points to 434.87 points after one month , this decrease originated from the credit tightening activities of the State Bank. In 2010 and 2011 , the Government implemented a tight monetary policy, the growth rate of money supply decreased and the Vn-Index also had the same trend, specifically: the growth rate of money supply decreased from 26% (December 2009) to 19% (April 2010), the Vn-Index decreased by 7% overall ; The 2011 money supply growth rate decreased from 30% to 11.9% , the Vn-Index decreased by 23%.

Phase 2012 – 2014:


When inflation was controlled and the economy showed signs of improvement, in 2012 the growth rate of money supply improved from 11.9% to 24.5% (doubled ) , the stock market also showed positive signs when the VN-Index increased by 17% compared to the previous year . In 2013 , the money supply continued to increase (18% increase ) and the VN-Index increased by 22.2%. In 2014 , the VN-Index fluctuated slightly and the money supply also had similar results . In December 2015, money supply increased by 14.9% compared to the same period last year and the VN-Index ended 2015 with an increase of 6.1% compared to the last trading session of 2014.

In general, through monetary policy , money supply has had a positive impact on the stock market throughout the research period.


4.2. Research results


4.2.1. Results of testing the stationarity of the data series

To test the stationarity of variables in the model, the thesis uses the Augmented Dickey – Fuller (ADF) and Phillips Person (PP) tests to test the existence of units in the data series . The results of the tests are presented in the table :


Table 4.1. Unit root test



Level Difference

Variable ADF PP ADF PP


0.0398*** 0.0795*** 0.0000* 0.0000*

LnVNI (-2,950) (-2,669) (-6,646) (-6,573)


0.8687 0.8679 0.0000* 0.0000*

LnEX (-0.610) (-0.614) (-10.194) (-10.178)


0.2339 0.3287 0.0000* 0.0000*

LnOP (-2.127) (-1.907) (-5.118) (-7.173)


0.3205 0.6204 0.0004* 0.0000*

LnLR (-1,925) (-1,319) (-4,324) (-7,893)


0.5751 0.2986 0.0020* 0.0000*

LnCPI (-1,415) (-1,973) (-3,899) (-5,294)


0.1466 0.2487 0.0000* 0.0000*

LnM2 (-2.383) (-2.090) (-9.107) (-9.263)


Source: author's own calculation using Stata


Note: *,**,*** indicate significance levels of 1%, 5%, 10% respectively. From the results of Table 4.1, it can be seen that:

For ADF test, LnVNI variable stops at level with 10% significance, the remaining variables do not stop at level.

For PP test, LnVNI variable stops at level with 10% significance, the remaining variables do not stop at level.

However, when switching to the most significant difference , all variables stop at the 1% significance level when tested by ADF and PP test.

Thus , it can be concluded that the time series of variables LnVNI, LnEX, LnOP, LnLR, LnCPI, LnM2 have met the requirement of stationary time series for cointegration test, the cointegration coefficient of the above variables is 1 or I(1) .

Comment


Agree Privacy Policy *