* Cronbach's Alpha analysis 1st time for MC Reliability Statistics variable
Cronbach's Alpha
Number of observed variables | |
0.913 | 6 |
Maybe you are interested!
-
Identifying and controlling factors affecting the quality of accounting information in the environment of applying enterprise resource planning system ERP in Vietnamese enterprises - 12 -
Controlling Factors Affecting the Quality of Accounting Information in the ERP Application Environment at Vietnamese Enterprises. -
Research Results of Factors Affecting the Implementation of Management Accounting to Evaluate Operational Efficiency in Travel Enterprises -
Research Results on Factors Affecting the Quality of Auditing Financial Statements of Banks Conducted by the State Audit -
Research Hypothesis Regarding the Impact of Ownership Structure on the Quality of Accounting Information
Variable – total correction
Scale
Scale Mean if Item Deleted variable) | Scale Variance if Item Deleted variable) | Corrected Item- Total Correlation total adjustment) | Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted (Cronbach's Alpha if removed variable) | |
MC1 | 17.87 | 15,055 | 0.705 | 0.905 |
MC2 | 17.79 | 14,545 | 0.794 | 0.892 |
MC3 | 17.71 | 14,921 | 0.777 | 0.895 |
MC4 | 17.60 | 15,154 | 0.798 | 0.893 |
MC5 | 17.96 | 15,044 | 0.682 | 0.909 |
MC6 | 17.73 | 14,804 | 0.795 | 0.892 |
* Cronbach's Alpha analysis 1st time for TMS Reliability Statistics variable
Cronbach's Alpha
Number of observed variables | |
0.918 | 4 |
Variable – total correction
Scale
Scale Mean if Item Deleted variable) | Scale Variance if Item Deleted variable) | Corrected Item- Total Correlation total adjustment) | Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted (Cronbach's Alpha if removed variable) | |
TMS1 | 5.82 | 2,628 | 0.754 | 0.912 |
TMS2 | 5.78 | 2,616 | 0.823 | 0.890 |
TMS3 | 5.78 | 2,480 | 0.792 | 0.900 |
TMS4 | 5.78 | 2,387 | 0.881 | 0.868 |
* Cronbach's Alpha analysis 1st time for MK Reliability Statistics variable
Cronbach's Alpha
Number of observed variables | |
0.923 | 4 |
Variable – total correction
Scale
Scale Mean if Item Deleted variable) | Scale Variance if Item Deleted variable) | Corrected Item- Total Correlation total adjustment) | Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted (Cronbach's Alpha if removed variable) | |
MK1 | 11.23 | 5,121 | 0.809 | 0.904 |
MK2 | 11.27 | 5,031 | 0.820 | 0.901 |
MK3 | 11.37 | 4,886 | 0.782 | 0.915 |
MK4 | 11.34 | 4,832 | 0.882 | 0.879 |
* Cronbach's Alpha analysis 1 for FP Reliability Statistics variable
Cronbach's Alpha
Number of observed variables | |
0.882 | 4 |
Variable – total correction
Scale
Scale Mean if Item Deleted variable) | Scale Variance if Item Deleted variable) | Corrected Item- Total Correlation total adjustment) | Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted (Cronbach's Alpha if removed variable) | |
FP1 | 11.85 | 3,159 | 0.784 | 0.833 |
FP2 | 11.99 | 3,190 | 0.777 | 0.835 |
FP3 | 11.90 | 3,176 | 0.703 | 0.867 |
FP4 | 11.83 | 3,590 | 0.727 | 0.858 |
Appendix 4.3: Results of EFA analysis of the official study Part 1: EFA analysis for independent variables
KMO and Bartlett's test
KMO coefficient
0.884 | ||
Bartlett's test | Approximate Chi-square value | 6,182,799 |
Number of degrees of freedom (df) | 703 | |
Significance level (Sig.) | 0.000 |
Testing the level of explanation of observed variables for factors
Component variable
Eigenvalues Criteria | Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings | Rotation Sums of Squared Loadings a | |||||
Total | % explained variance Okay | % cumulative variance | Total | % explained variance | % cumulative variance | Total | |
1 | 10,994 | 28,932 | 28,932 | 10,677 | 28,098 | 28,098 | 6,301 |
2 | 4,129 | 10,865 | 39,797 | 3,849 | 10,130 | 38,227 | 6,794 |
3 | 3,227 | 8,491 | 48,288 | 2,929 | 7,709 | 45,936 | 5,440 |
4 | 2,840 | 7,473 | 55,761 | 2,518 | 6,626 | 52,562 | 3,859 |
5 | 2,363 | 6,219 | 61,980 | 2,041 | 5,372 | 57,934 | 5,062 |
6 | 2,105 | 5,538 | 67,518 | 1,794 | 4,721 | 62,655 | 6,581 |
7 | 1,379 | 3,629 | 71,148 | 1,110 | 2,921 | 65,576 | 5,953 |
8 | 1,347 | 3,544 | 74,692 | 1,027 | 2,704 | 68,279 | 6,642 |
9 | 0.761 | 2,002 | 76,694 | ||||
10 | 0.579 | 1,523 | 78,217 | ||||
11 | 0.554 | 1,457 | 79,674 | ||||
12 | 0.531 | 1,396 | 81,071 | ||||
13 | 0.518 | 1,363 | 82,433 | ||||
14
0.462 | 1,216 | 83,649 | |||||
15 | 0.452 | 1,189 | 84,838 | ||||
16 | 0.423 | 1,114 | 85,952 | ||||
17 | 0.398 | 1,048 | 87,000 | ||||
18 | 0.371 | 0.977 | 87,977 | ||||
19 | 0.361 | 0.950 | 88,927 | ||||
20 | 0.348 | 0.917 | 89,844 | ||||
21 | 0.340 | 0.895 | 90,739 | ||||
22 | 0.320 | 0.841 | 91,580 | ||||
23 | 0.309 | 0.813 | 92,393 | ||||
24 | 0.296 | 0.780 | 93,173 | ||||
25 | 0.265 | 0.698 | 93,871 | ||||
26 | 0.257 | 0.675 | 94,546 | ||||
27 | 0.246 | 0.646 | 95,193 | ||||
28 | 0.242 | 0.637 | 95,830 | ||||
29 | 0.230 | 0.607 | 96,436 | ||||
30 | 0.206 | 0.543 | 96,979 | ||||
31 | 0.183 | 0.481 | 97,460 | ||||
32 | 0.179 | 0.471 | 97,932 | ||||
33 | 0.170 | 0.448 | 98,379 | ||||
34 | 0.159 | 0.419 | 98,798 | ||||
35 | 0.139 | 0.365 | 99,164 | ||||
36 | 0.122 | 0.322 | 99,485 | ||||
37 | 0.110 | 0.291 | 99,776 | ||||
38 | 0.085 | 0.224 | 100,000 |
Extraction method: principal component analysis
a. When factors are correlated, the sum of squared variances cannot be added to form the total variance.
Pattern Matrix a
Factor | ||||||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |
MC2 | 0.894 | |||||||
MC4 | 0.834 | |||||||
MC6 | 0.821 | |||||||
MC3 | 0.811 | |||||||
MC5 | 0.731 | |||||||
MC1 | 0.683 | |||||||
Q_AIS4 | 0.888 | |||||||
Q_AIS7 | 0.825 | |||||||
Q_AIS5 | 0.807 | |||||||
Q_AIS2 | 0.791 | |||||||
Q_AIS3 | 0.727 | |||||||
Q_AIS1 | 0.643 | |||||||
TE5 | 0.888 | |||||||
TE2 | 0.887 | |||||||
TE3 | 0.838 | |||||||
TE4 | 0.832 | |||||||
TE1 | 0.772 | |||||||
TMS4 | 0.939 | |||||||
TMS1 | 0.839 | |||||||
TMS3 | 0.821 | |||||||
TMS2 | 0.816 | |||||||
IT7 | 0.853 | |||||||
IT6 | 0.822 | |||||||
IT1
0.777 | ||||||||
IT5 | 0.764 | |||||||
IT2 | 0.653 | |||||||
MK4 | 0.917 | |||||||
MK2 | 0.903 | |||||||
MK1 | 0.821 | |||||||
MK3 | 0.806 | |||||||
FP4 | 0.883 | |||||||
FP2 | 0.852 | |||||||
FP1 | 0.780 | |||||||
FP3 | 0.627 | |||||||
OC5 | 0.926 | |||||||
OC2 | 0.817 | |||||||
OC3 | 0.671 | |||||||
OC4 | 0.593 |
Extraction method: Principal component analysis
Factor rotation method: Factor rotation of Kaiser Normalization.
a. Factor rotation allows 6 repetitions
Appendix 4.4: Impact of enterprise size on quality of information technology and operational efficiency
Test 2 independent samples
Levene's test for equality of variances | t-test for equality of means | |||||||||
F test value | Test significance level (Sig.) | Test value (t) | Number of degrees of freedom (df) | Test significance level Sig. (2- tailed) | Mean Difference | Difference error (Std. Error Difference) | 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference | |||
Lowest | Upper | |||||||||
Q_ AI S | Equal population variance | 6,196 | 0.014 | -11,285 | 220 | 0.000 | -0.92721 | 0.08217 | -1.08 | -0.765 |
Unequal population variances | -12,517 | 195,385 | 0.000 | -0.92721 | 0.07408 | -1.07 | -0.781 | |||
FP | Equal population variance | 0.799 | 0.372 | 4,417 | 220 | 0.000 | 0.35646 | 0.08070 | 0.197 | 0.515 |
Unequal population variances | 4,769 | 183,139 | 0.000 | 0.35646 | 0.07474 | 0.209 | 0.503 | |||
Appendix 4.5: Multi-group analysis by enterprise size (Medium size) of the variability model

Appendix 4.6: Multi-group analysis by enterprise size (Large size) of the variability model






