Revenue from tourism of businesses reached 273,279 million VND (64.4%), the highest among the remaining groups. The lowest proportion was revenue from services at 46,793 million VND (11.1%), the remaining two groups accounted for almost equal proportions: hotels and restaurants at 52,970 million VND (12.4%) and tourism at 51,195 million VND (12.1%).
The main reason why the revenue of businesses is higher than other groups is because the tourism products offered are very popular and suitable to the tastes of tourists. The service group has low revenue because there are not many services to serve tourists, the tourism staff is still unprofessional and there is no synchronization.
2.4.5. General assessment of agricultural tourism development in Da Lat city
* Traveler Reviews
- According to survey results, the majority of tourists are satisfied when coming to these tourist destinations.
Table 2.13. Visitors' reviews of tourist attractions in Da Lat
Criteria
Location
Tourists | Like it very much | Quite like it | Prefer | Medium | Dislike | ||||||
People (votes) | Rate (%) | People (votes) | Rate (%) | People (votes) | Rate (%) | People (votes) | Rate (%) | People (votes) | Rate (%) | ||
Cau Dat Tea Hill | International | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Inland | 3 | 1.5 | 13 | 6.5 | 5 | 2.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | |
Cool Camp | International | 3 | 1.5 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Inland | 10 | 5 | 7 | 3.5 | 14 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Ho Xuan Quarter Smell | International | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Inland | 5 | 2.5 | 16 | 8 | 41 | 20.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Van Flower Village Wall | International | 3 | 1.5 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Inland | 31 | 15.5 | 18 | 9 | 11 | 5.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Total | International | 7 | 3.5 | 7 | 3.5 | 11 | 5.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Inland | 49 | 24.5 | 54 | 27 | 71 | 35.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | |
Total | 56 | 28 | 61 | 30.5 | 82 | 41 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | |
Maybe you are interested!
-
Identify Rating Levels and Rating Scales
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism,quan lan,quang ninh,ecology,ecotourism,minh chau,van don,geography,geographical basis,tourism development,science
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
of the islanders. Therefore, this indicator will be divided into two sub-indicators:
a1. Natural tourism attractiveness a2. Cultural tourism attractiveness
b. Tourist capacity
The two island communes in Quan Lan have different capacities to receive tourists. Minh Chau Commune is home to many standard hotels and resorts, attracting high-income domestic and international tourists. Meanwhile, Quan Lan Commune has many motels mainly built and operated by local people, so the scale and quality are not high, and will be suitable for ordinary tourists such as students.
c. Time of exploitation of Quan Lan Island Commune:
Quan Lan tourism is seasonal due to weather and climate conditions and festivals only take place on certain days of the year, specifically in spring. In Quan Lan commune, the period from April to June and from September to November is considered the best time to visit Quan Lan because the cultural tourism activities are mainly associated with festivals taking place during this time.
Minh Chau island commune:
Tourism exploitation time is all year round, because this is a place with a number of tourist attractions with diverse ecosystems such as Bai Tu Long National Park Research Center, Tram forest, Turtle Laying Beach, so besides coming to the beach for tourism and vacation in the summer, Minh Chau will attract research groups to come for tourism combined with research at other times of the year.
d. Sustainability
The sustainability of ecotourism sites in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes depends on the sensitivity of the ecosystems to climate changes.
landscape. In general, these tourist destinations have a fairly high level of sustainability, because they are natural ecosystems, planned and protected. However, if a large number of tourists gather at certain times, it can exceed the carrying capacity and affect the sustainability of the environment (polluted beaches, damaged trees, animals moving away from their habitats, etc.), then the sustainability of the above ecosystems (natural ecosystems, human ecosystems) will also be affected and become less sustainable.
e. Location and accessibility
Both island communes have ports to take tourists to visit from Van Don wharf:
- Quan Lan – Van Don traffic route:
Phuc Thinh – Viet Anh high-speed boat and Quang Minh high-speed boat, depart at 8am and 2pm from Van Don to Quan Lan, and at 7am and 1pm from Quan Lan to Van Don. There are also wooden boats departing at 7am and 1pm.
- Van Don - Minh Chau traffic route:
Chung Huong high-speed train, Minh Chau train, morning 7:30 and afternoon 13:30 from Van Don to Minh Chau, morning 6:30 and afternoon 13:00 from Minh Chau to Van Don.
f. Infrastructure
Despite receiving investment attention, the issue of infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism on Quan Lan Island is still an issue that needs to be resolved because it has a direct impact on the implementation of ecotourism activities. The minimum conditions for serving tourists such as accommodation, electricity, water, communication, especially medical services, and security work need to be given top priority. Ecotourism spots in Minh Chau commune are assessed to have better infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism because there are quite complete and synchronous conditions for serving tourists, meeting many needs of domestic and foreign tourists.
3.2.1.4. Determine assessment levels and assessment scales
Corresponding to the levels of each criterion, the index is the score of those levels in the order of 4, 3, 2, 1 decreasing according to the standard of each level: very attractive (4), attractive (3), average (2), less attractive (1).
3.2.1.5. Determining the coefficients of the criteria
For the assessment of DLST in the two communes of Quan Lan and Minh Chau islands, the students added evaluation coefficients to show the importance of the criteria and indicators as follows:
Coefficient 3 with criteria: Attractiveness, Exploitation time. These are the 2 most important criteria for attracting tourists to tourism in general and eco-tourism in particular, so they have the highest coefficient.
Coefficient 2 with criteria: Capacity, Infrastructure, Location and accessibility . Because the assessment area is an island commune of Van Don district, the above criteria are selected by the author with appropriate coefficients at the average level.
Coefficient 1 with criteria: Sustainability. Quan Lan has natural and human-made ecotourism sites, with high biodiversity and little impact from local human factors. Most of the ecotourism sites are still wild, so they are highly sustainable.
3.2.1.6. Results of DLST assessment on Quan Lan island
a. Assessment of the potential for natural tourism development
For Minh Chau commune:
+ Natural tourism attractiveness is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined as average (2 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of Capacity criterion is 2 x 2 = 4.
+ Exploitation time is long (4 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Exploitation time criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is assessed as good (3 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 3 x 2 = 6 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Minh Chau commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 4 + 12 + 4 + 4 + 6 = 42 points
Similar assessment for Quan Lan commune, we have the following table:
Table 3.3: Assessment of the potential for natural ecotourism development in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of self-tourismof course
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
CommuneMinh Chau
12
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
42/52
Quan CommuneLan
6
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
33/52
b. Assessment of the potential for humanistic tourism development
For Quan Lan commune:
+ The attractiveness of human tourism is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined to be large (3 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Capacity criterion is 3 x 2 = 6.
+ Mining time is average (3 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Mining time criterion is 3 x 3 = 9.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points.
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is rated as average (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Quan Lan commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 6 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 4 = 36 points.
Similar assessment with Minh Chau commune we have the following table:
Table 3.4: Assessment of the potential for developing humanistic eco-tourism in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of human tourismliterature
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Quan CommuneLan
12
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
39/52
Minh CommuneChau
6
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
36/52
Basically, both Minh Chau and Quan Lan localities have quite favorable conditions for developing ecotourism. However, Quan Lan commune has more advantages to develop ecotourism in a humanistic direction, because this is an area with many famous historical relics such as Quan Lan Communal House, Quan Lan Pagoda, Temple worshiping the hero Tran Khanh Du, ... along with local festivals held annually such as the wind praying ceremony (March 15), Quan Lan festival (June 10-19); due to its location near the port and long exploitation time, the beaches in Quan Lan commune (especially Quan Lan beach) are no longer hygienic and clean to ensure the needs of tourists coming to relax and swim; this is also an area with many beautiful landscapes such as Got Beo wind pass, Ong Phong head, Voi Voi cave, but the ability to access these places is still very limited (dirt hill road, lots of gravel and rocks), especially during rainy and windy times; In addition, other natural resources such as mangrove forests and sea worms have not been really exploited for tourism purposes and ecotourism development. On the contrary, Minh Chau commune has more advantages in developing ecotourism in the direction of natural tourism, this is an area with diverse ecosystems such as at Rua De Beach, Bai Tu Long National Park Conservation Center...; Minh Chau beach is highly appreciated for its natural beauty and cleanliness, ranked in the top ten most beautiful beaches in Vietnam; Minh Chau commune is also home to Tram forest with a large area and a purity of up to 90%, suitable for building bridges through the forest (a very effective type of natural ecotourism currently applied by many countries) for tourists to sightsee, as well as for the purpose of studying and researching.
Figure 3.1: Thenmala Forest Bridge (India) Source: https://www.thenmalaecotourism.com/(August 21, 2019)
3.2.2. Using SWOT matrix to evaluate Quan Lan island tourism
General assessment of current tourism activities of Quan Lan island is shown through the following SWOT matrix:
Table 3.5: SWOT matrix evaluating tourism activities on Quan Lan island
Internal agent
Strengths- There is a lot of potential for tourism development, especially natural ecotourism and humanistic ecotourism.- The unskilled labor force is relatively abundant.- resource environmentunpolluted, still
Weaknesses- Poorly developed infrastructure, especially traffic routes to tourist destinations on the island.- The team of professional staff is still weak.- Tourism products in general
quite wild, originalintact
general and DLST in particularalone is monotonous.
External agents
Opportunity- Tourism is a key industry in the socio-economic development strategy of the province and Van Don economic zone.- Quan Lan was selected as a pilot area for eco-tourism development within the framework of the green growth project between Quang Ninh province and the Japanese organization JICA.- The flow of tourists and especially ecotourism in the world tends toincreasing
Challenge- Weather and climate change abnormally.- Competition in tourism products is increasingly fierce, especially with other localities in the province such as Ha Long, Mong Cai...- Awareness of tourists, especially domestic tourists, about ecotourism and nature conservation is not high.
Through summary analysis using SWOT matrix we see that:
To exploit strengths and take advantage of opportunities, it is necessary to:
- Diversify products and service types (build more tourism routes aimed at specific needs of tourists: experiential tourism immersed in nature, spiritual cultural tourism...)
- Effective exploitation of resources and differentiated products (natural resources and human resources)
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: #0D0D0D; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -3pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Symbol, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:Wingdings; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:Cambria, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: #212121; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
General Assessment of Factors Affecting Tourism Development in Vientiane City -
General Assessment of Human Resource Development in the Tourism Industry in Hanoi -
Research on landscape assessment for agricultural, forestry and tourism development in Dong Thap Muoi area, Dong Thap province - 15 -
General Assessment of the Current Status of Tourism Development in Flood Season (Swot Analysis)
Source: 2018 survey results
Tourists rated the tourist destinations as very liked by 28%, quite liked by 30.5%, liked by 41%, average by 0.5% and there were no cases of dislike. The rate of very liked by international visitors was 4.5% while that of domestic visitors was 24.5%, the rate of quite liked by international visitors was 3.5% but domestic visitors accounted for 27%, the rate of liked by international visitors was 5.5% and that of domestic visitors was 35.5%. Thus, according to the survey, we can see that the tourist destinations are highly appreciated, very attractive and appealing to tourists.
- One of the criteria that helps tourist destinations retain tourists is the quality and tourism services. If a tourist destination lacks the above two factors, it will not attract tourists for a long time, while the purpose of the tourism strategy is sustainable development.
- According to the author's survey in 2018, at agricultural tourism locations, tourists were quite satisfied with the quality and service, specifically as follows:
Table 2.14. Tourists' evaluation of tourism quality and services
Evaluation criteria
Tourists | Very good | Pretty good | Good | Medium | Least | ||||||
People (Vote) | Ratio rate (%) | People (Vote) | Ratio rate (%) | People (Vote) | Rate (%) | People (Vote) | Ratio rate (%) | People (Vote) | Ratio rate (%) | ||
diversity Product form | International | 12 | 6 | 5 | 2.5 | 3 | 1.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Inland | 67 | 33.5 | 49 | 24.5 | 58 | 29 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
Total | 79 | 39.5 | 54 | 27 | 61 | 30.5 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
Product quality product | International | 2 | 1 | 7 | 3.5 | 9 | 4.5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Inland | 34 | 17 | 35 | 17.5 | 107 | 53.5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
Total | 36 | 18 | 42 | 21 | 118 | 59 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
Services (facilities- technical) | International | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1.5 | 12 | 6 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 |
Inland | 49 | 24.5 | 37 | 18.5 | 78 | 39 | 14 | 7 | 2 | 1 | |
Total | 53 | 26.5 | 40 | 20 | 90 | 45 | 15 | 7.5 | 2 | 1 | |
Attitude serve | International | 3 | 1.5 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 7.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Inland | 29 | 14.5 | 98 | 49 | 34 | 17 | 17 | 8.5 | 2 | 1 | |
Evaluation criteria
of staff
Tourists | Very good | Pretty good | Good | Medium | Least | ||||||
People (Vote) | Ratio rate (%) | People (Vote) | Ratio rate (%) | People (Vote) | Rate (%) | People (Vote) | Ratio rate (%) | People (Vote) | Ratio rate (%) | ||
Total | 32 | 16 | 100 | 50 | 49 | 24.5 | 17 | 8.5 | 2 | 1 | |
Lip school | International | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 16 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Inland | 24 | 12 | 15 | 7.5 | 138 | 69 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | |
Total | 26 | 13 | 17 | 8.5 | 154 | 77 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | |
The friendliness of the community resident | International | 15 | 7.5 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 |
Inland | 80 | 40 | 70 | 35 | 20 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0.5 | |
Total | 95 | 47.5 | 78 | 39 | 21 | 10.5 | 5 | 2.5 | 1 | 0.5 | |
Source: 2018 survey results
Regarding the diversity of products, tourists rated them highly: very good 39.5%, quite good 27% and good 30.5%. However, 3% of tourists rated them average, which shows that tourism products have not yet satisfied tourists' needs. In addition, the quality of tourism products was rated at an average level of 1%, while most tourists said that the quality was good (59%) and very good (18%).
Regarding service and service attitude of staff, it is rated as good, accounting for over 3/4 of the survey votes. However, there is still a situation of staff not being attentive and not enthusiastic, accounting for 1%, making tourists still not really satisfied when traveling to these places.
According to the survey results, most tourists rated the environment at the tourist destination as clean and pleasant, very suitable for tourism. The number of tourists who rated the environment as good was 77%, quite good was 8.5%, very good was 13%, and there were still 1% who rated it as average and 0.55% as poor. At some tourist destinations, there was still household waste that had not been collected after tourists had finished using it or some products such as pesticides, fertilizer bags, etc. that had not been treated, but this number was very small.
In general, tourists rated the facilities and technical infrastructure as very good, the prices are cheap and suitable for all audiences and ages. The service attitude of tour guides and staff is warm, enthusiastic, creating a good impression, making tourists very satisfied. This makes their trip better than expected and they still want to come back when they have the chance (99.5%).
The impression that tourists have of the local people is extremely important. Therefore, the people here always welcome guests with an open, gentle and hospitable attitude. The majority of tourists rate the local community as friendly, at a very good level of 47.5%; quite good 39%, good 10.5%, only 2.5% rate it at an average level and 0.5% at a poor level.
* Strengths
The terrain of Da Lat is mainly low mountains and plateaus, very favorable for livestock farming, growing vegetables, flowers, tubers, fruits, industrial crops, etc. to develop the economy in general and tourism in particular, especially agricultural tourism. Besides, Da Lat also has many beautiful natural landscapes such as: mountains, forests, rivers, lakes, fields, etc., which are very suitable for traditional agriculture, and are also conditions for creating excellent agricultural tourism products. This is also considered a "high-tech agricultural experimental area", friendly to the environment and nature.
Dalat's nature has endowed the people here not only with natural products but also created conditions for this land to be able to grow special products different from other localities: artichokes, strawberries,...
In Da Lat, there are still many craft villages associated with agricultural traditions such as: Van Thanh flower village, Trai Mat vegetable village, Cau Dat tea village, ... which are increasingly attracting tourists' attention and visits. This place also records many unique cultural traditions of ethnic minorities: K'ho, Hoa, Tay, Nung, Cham, ... with great potential for developing agricultural tourism associated with many historical and cultural relics that need to be preserved and promoted.
In addition, this place has many strengths to develop agriculture, especially growing vegetables and flowers. The application of high technology in production not only improves the quality of output products but also attracts many tourists to visit.
This is also an opportunity for other localities to learn from experience, contributing to promoting more sustainable tourism development.
* Limit
- The promotion of Da Lat tourism on mass media is currently still weak. Especially the communication channel through social networks, this is a very effective channel for international visitors, because most of them travel based on the promotion on the internet and the reviews of previous travelers. And the weakness in the tourism promotion strategy is also a limitation of Vietnam tourism in general, not just Da Lat tourism or DLNN in particular.
- The terrain in some places is rugged and infrastructure is degraded, limiting the exploitation of tourist sites.
- The exploitation of tourism sites takes place freely, lacking synchronous planning from local levels and sectors.
- Most of the tourism areas and spots in the province only focus on exploiting natural landscapes for outdoor sightseeing, not paying attention to embellishment and investment in creating new products, leading to monotonous, duplicated tourism products and services that are less attractive to tourists.
- Non-residential tourism sites do not invest in upgrading, causing waste of tourism resources and affecting the local tourism brand.
- Agricultural land is increasingly limited because investors take land to build entertainment areas, golf courses, restaurants, hotels, etc.
- The government has not really created favorable conditions for businesses to invest, still causing difficulties; there is no specific plan to develop agricultural tourism, tourism products are still monotonous.
- The connection between the tourist area and the travel agency in attracting tourists is still loose. The professional level, capacity, and communication skills in tourism culture of the staff have not met the needs of tourists.
Chapter 2 Summary
In recent years, with the development of tourism in the whole country, Da Lat tourism in general and rural tourism in particular have continuously developed and matured, contributing to the development of the local socio-economic foundation. However, Da Lat city has not yet fully exploited the potential of agricultural resources to serve tourists.
Chapter 2 has outlined Da Lat city, the resources exploited for tourism development here. In particular, it has assessed the potential and current status of exploiting agricultural tourism in the city. Although there are many conditions to develop this new type of agricultural tourism, it has not attracted much attention from the community.

85
Chapter 3. ORIENTATION AND SOLUTIONS FOR DEVELOPING AGRICULTURAL TOURISM IN DA LAT CITY
3.1. Orientation for agricultural tourism development in Da Lat city
3.1.1. The bases for building development orientation and solutions
* Orientation for development of eco-tourism in general and rural tourism in particular of the General Department of Tourism
calendar
- Developing eco-tourism must ensure sustainable economic efficiency in the direction of use.
ecosystem services, sharing benefits with the community.
- The effectiveness of eco-tourism development activities contributes positively to the conservation of natural resources and cultural resources.
- Developing ecotourism must create authentic ecotourism products, contributing to satisfying tourists' needs, thereby increasing the number of tourists coming to tourist destinations.
- Developing eco-tourism must comply with current State regulations, paying attention to innovative and breakthrough models that contribute to perfecting the policy mechanism on eco-tourism development.
- Agricultural development planning is closely linked with tourism planning to ensure sustainable development orientation and mutual support.
- Effectively promote and publicize agricultural tourism models and products and replicate these models nationwide.
- It requires the participation of both the Tourism and Agriculture sectors, along with all levels, sectors and the business community.
- Building a rural tourism brand must be associated with service quality and cultural identity preservation.
- There should be specific and preferential policies from the Party, State and local authorities to encourage the development of rural tourism.
- Strengthening the connection between farmers - scientists - businesses - managers to develop sustainable agricultural tourism.





