In addition to the internal relationship backlog, currently, joint ventures with foreign countries at VNPT also have the following problems:
In the labor structure of joint ventures, the labor force has qualifications.
The number of universities or higher education institutions is relatively large. However, the organization of Research and Development (R&D) departments is still weak, and functions are not clearly defined, so the strength of highly qualified staff cannot be promoted.
There are no regulations defining the rights and obligations of the management staff that VNPT sends to work in the joint venture as well as the staff participating in the Board of Directors.
Maybe you are interested!
-
Identify Rating Levels and Rating Scales
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism,quan lan,quang ninh,ecology,ecotourism,minh chau,van don,geography,geographical basis,tourism development,science
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
of the islanders. Therefore, this indicator will be divided into two sub-indicators:
a1. Natural tourism attractiveness a2. Cultural tourism attractiveness
b. Tourist capacity
The two island communes in Quan Lan have different capacities to receive tourists. Minh Chau Commune is home to many standard hotels and resorts, attracting high-income domestic and international tourists. Meanwhile, Quan Lan Commune has many motels mainly built and operated by local people, so the scale and quality are not high, and will be suitable for ordinary tourists such as students.
c. Time of exploitation of Quan Lan Island Commune:
Quan Lan tourism is seasonal due to weather and climate conditions and festivals only take place on certain days of the year, specifically in spring. In Quan Lan commune, the period from April to June and from September to November is considered the best time to visit Quan Lan because the cultural tourism activities are mainly associated with festivals taking place during this time.
Minh Chau island commune:
Tourism exploitation time is all year round, because this is a place with a number of tourist attractions with diverse ecosystems such as Bai Tu Long National Park Research Center, Tram forest, Turtle Laying Beach, so besides coming to the beach for tourism and vacation in the summer, Minh Chau will attract research groups to come for tourism combined with research at other times of the year.
d. Sustainability
The sustainability of ecotourism sites in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes depends on the sensitivity of the ecosystems to climate changes.
landscape. In general, these tourist destinations have a fairly high level of sustainability, because they are natural ecosystems, planned and protected. However, if a large number of tourists gather at certain times, it can exceed the carrying capacity and affect the sustainability of the environment (polluted beaches, damaged trees, animals moving away from their habitats, etc.), then the sustainability of the above ecosystems (natural ecosystems, human ecosystems) will also be affected and become less sustainable.
e. Location and accessibility
Both island communes have ports to take tourists to visit from Van Don wharf:
- Quan Lan – Van Don traffic route:
Phuc Thinh – Viet Anh high-speed boat and Quang Minh high-speed boat, depart at 8am and 2pm from Van Don to Quan Lan, and at 7am and 1pm from Quan Lan to Van Don. There are also wooden boats departing at 7am and 1pm.
- Van Don - Minh Chau traffic route:
Chung Huong high-speed train, Minh Chau train, morning 7:30 and afternoon 13:30 from Van Don to Minh Chau, morning 6:30 and afternoon 13:00 from Minh Chau to Van Don.
f. Infrastructure
Despite receiving investment attention, the issue of infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism on Quan Lan Island is still an issue that needs to be resolved because it has a direct impact on the implementation of ecotourism activities. The minimum conditions for serving tourists such as accommodation, electricity, water, communication, especially medical services, and security work need to be given top priority. Ecotourism spots in Minh Chau commune are assessed to have better infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism because there are quite complete and synchronous conditions for serving tourists, meeting many needs of domestic and foreign tourists.
3.2.1.4. Determine assessment levels and assessment scales
Corresponding to the levels of each criterion, the index is the score of those levels in the order of 4, 3, 2, 1 decreasing according to the standard of each level: very attractive (4), attractive (3), average (2), less attractive (1).
3.2.1.5. Determining the coefficients of the criteria
For the assessment of DLST in the two communes of Quan Lan and Minh Chau islands, the students added evaluation coefficients to show the importance of the criteria and indicators as follows:
Coefficient 3 with criteria: Attractiveness, Exploitation time. These are the 2 most important criteria for attracting tourists to tourism in general and eco-tourism in particular, so they have the highest coefficient.
Coefficient 2 with criteria: Capacity, Infrastructure, Location and accessibility . Because the assessment area is an island commune of Van Don district, the above criteria are selected by the author with appropriate coefficients at the average level.
Coefficient 1 with criteria: Sustainability. Quan Lan has natural and human-made ecotourism sites, with high biodiversity and little impact from local human factors. Most of the ecotourism sites are still wild, so they are highly sustainable.
3.2.1.6. Results of DLST assessment on Quan Lan island
a. Assessment of the potential for natural tourism development
For Minh Chau commune:
+ Natural tourism attractiveness is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined as average (2 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of Capacity criterion is 2 x 2 = 4.
+ Exploitation time is long (4 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Exploitation time criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is assessed as good (3 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 3 x 2 = 6 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Minh Chau commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 4 + 12 + 4 + 4 + 6 = 42 points
Similar assessment for Quan Lan commune, we have the following table:
Table 3.3: Assessment of the potential for natural ecotourism development in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of self-tourismof course
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
CommuneMinh Chau
12
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
42/52
Quan CommuneLan
6
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
33/52
b. Assessment of the potential for humanistic tourism development
For Quan Lan commune:
+ The attractiveness of human tourism is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined to be large (3 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Capacity criterion is 3 x 2 = 6.
+ Mining time is average (3 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Mining time criterion is 3 x 3 = 9.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points.
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is rated as average (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Quan Lan commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 6 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 4 = 36 points.
Similar assessment with Minh Chau commune we have the following table:
Table 3.4: Assessment of the potential for developing humanistic eco-tourism in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of human tourismliterature
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Quan CommuneLan
12
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
39/52
Minh CommuneChau
6
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
36/52
Basically, both Minh Chau and Quan Lan localities have quite favorable conditions for developing ecotourism. However, Quan Lan commune has more advantages to develop ecotourism in a humanistic direction, because this is an area with many famous historical relics such as Quan Lan Communal House, Quan Lan Pagoda, Temple worshiping the hero Tran Khanh Du, ... along with local festivals held annually such as the wind praying ceremony (March 15), Quan Lan festival (June 10-19); due to its location near the port and long exploitation time, the beaches in Quan Lan commune (especially Quan Lan beach) are no longer hygienic and clean to ensure the needs of tourists coming to relax and swim; this is also an area with many beautiful landscapes such as Got Beo wind pass, Ong Phong head, Voi Voi cave, but the ability to access these places is still very limited (dirt hill road, lots of gravel and rocks), especially during rainy and windy times; In addition, other natural resources such as mangrove forests and sea worms have not been really exploited for tourism purposes and ecotourism development. On the contrary, Minh Chau commune has more advantages in developing ecotourism in the direction of natural tourism, this is an area with diverse ecosystems such as at Rua De Beach, Bai Tu Long National Park Conservation Center...; Minh Chau beach is highly appreciated for its natural beauty and cleanliness, ranked in the top ten most beautiful beaches in Vietnam; Minh Chau commune is also home to Tram forest with a large area and a purity of up to 90%, suitable for building bridges through the forest (a very effective type of natural ecotourism currently applied by many countries) for tourists to sightsee, as well as for the purpose of studying and researching.
Figure 3.1: Thenmala Forest Bridge (India) Source: https://www.thenmalaecotourism.com/(August 21, 2019)
3.2.2. Using SWOT matrix to evaluate Quan Lan island tourism
General assessment of current tourism activities of Quan Lan island is shown through the following SWOT matrix:
Table 3.5: SWOT matrix evaluating tourism activities on Quan Lan island
Internal agent
Strengths- There is a lot of potential for tourism development, especially natural ecotourism and humanistic ecotourism.- The unskilled labor force is relatively abundant.- resource environmentunpolluted, still
Weaknesses- Poorly developed infrastructure, especially traffic routes to tourist destinations on the island.- The team of professional staff is still weak.- Tourism products in general
quite wild, originalintact
general and DLST in particularalone is monotonous.
External agents
Opportunity- Tourism is a key industry in the socio-economic development strategy of the province and Van Don economic zone.- Quan Lan was selected as a pilot area for eco-tourism development within the framework of the green growth project between Quang Ninh province and the Japanese organization JICA.- The flow of tourists and especially ecotourism in the world tends toincreasing
Challenge- Weather and climate change abnormally.- Competition in tourism products is increasingly fierce, especially with other localities in the province such as Ha Long, Mong Cai...- Awareness of tourists, especially domestic tourists, about ecotourism and nature conservation is not high.
Through summary analysis using SWOT matrix we see that:
To exploit strengths and take advantage of opportunities, it is necessary to:
- Diversify products and service types (build more tourism routes aimed at specific needs of tourists: experiential tourism immersed in nature, spiritual cultural tourism...)
- Effective exploitation of resources and differentiated products (natural resources and human resources)
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: #0D0D0D; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -3pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Symbol, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:Wingdings; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:Cambria, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: #212121; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
The Integration Process Creates a New, More Dynamic Economic Environment Serving the Growth Process and Gradually Shifting the Economic Structure -
Determining the Importance of Competitive Environment Factors -
Legal and Economic Environment Factors of Investment -
Application of Science and Technology in the Development of Tourism Economy in the Northern Key Economic Zone
Although VNPT has issued regulations on the consumption of industrial products within VNPT, the problem of consuming products of joint ventures still faces many difficulties. The bidding and approval process of projects is prolonged, so the companies are not proactive.
actively build their long-term business production plan.

With the current level of investment, after the joint venture expires (except for cable manufacturing companies) and especially when our economy integrates with the regional economy in 2006, the switchboard manufacturing joint ventures will not yet be in control.
Fully engineered product manufacturing both hardware and software.
The cost of joint venture products is still high, even higher than some similar products on the world market. This causes significant damage to Vietnam.
With the current level of product consumption, joint ventures only exploit 50-60% of equipment capacity, domestic market share is not enough to convince partners to invest in equipment and in-depth technology. In addition, the problem of creating regular jobs for workers is facing many difficulties.
The current import tax on telecommunications equipment by the State does not protect domestic manufacturers and does not encourage investors to increase the proportion of products and production in Vietnam. Some university joint ventures are recognized by the Ministry of Science, Technology and Environment as High-Tech Enterprises, but still do not enjoy the 0% import tax regime on input materials because the concept of input materials by the State has not been clarified...
Export activities of joint ventures are still very weak. In recent times, except for Vinadaesung joint venture, other joint ventures have not yet fully exploited the designed capacity of the production line while the joint ventures
The joint ventures have not paid due attention to product export activities, the total export value by the end of 1999 was only about 10 million USD, not commensurate with the potential and scale of the joint ventures. Promoting export activities is one of the important directions that joint ventures focus on if they want to further improve the efficiency of their operations.
The profits of joint ventures are generally unstable over the years and between joint ventures. In 1996, the total profits of the joint ventures reached their highest level (4.6 million USD), but in 1997, with the establishment of two new joint ventures, at the same time the Vietnamese and regional economies entered a period of crisis, so the total profits of the joint ventures were negative. Among the joint ventures, excluding the newly put into operation, only the Vinadaesung joint venture operated stably and most effectively. The other joint ventures operated unstablely, with losses in some years and losses in other years, and financial efficiency did not meet requirements.
The disbursement and investment speed of some BCCs, especially intra-provincial BCC projects, is still slow.
The actual amount of capital invested in the network depends on the speed of disbursement of investment capital sources committed in the contracts. In general, BCC projects are disbursed slowly, especially intra-provincial BCC projects, which only disburse 40%.
- 50% of investment capital is committed according to progress. Slow investment progress will limit VNPT's actual investment capital attraction results and affect the overall efficiency of operations.
FDI activities.
The financial efficiency of FDI projects (except for two projects BCC - VTI and BCC - VMS) has not met requirements.
The BCC projects are in the early stages of development, but there are signs that they are unlikely to deliver the performance forecasted in the contract.
The agreement was signed. This situation has reduced the confidence and enthusiasm of the
partners, affecting the investment process and project implementation.
2.3.3. Causes limiting the benefits of FDI projects
2.3.3.1. Subjective causes from VNPT side
Finding out the causes leading to limitations in the benefits of the activity
FDI activities to provide remedial directions are very important. This will
closely linked to the performance of projects and affecting the investment calling environment in the entire Vietnam Post and Telecommunications industry.
On VNPT side, there are some problems that directly affect the operation of the projects. Some of those problems are mentioned as follows:
First : Joint venture and BCC contracts are not signed tightly:
+ The form and content of the agreement in current BCCs do not specify the partners' ability to participate in business activities. BCC is a form of cooperation that does not establish a common legal entity, and the partners do not participate in project management. Specifically, the parties do not bind each other in terms of responsibilities such as investment disbursement, implementation of commitments and project business efficiency. The contract also does not foresee all possible scenarios, so both parties are often very passive when major problems arise.
+ Some joint venture contracts signed in previous years have not specified the technology transfer as well as the rights and obligations of the parties involved in the technology transfer activities, leading to foreign parties finding ways to delay the obligation to transfer technology to Vietnam.
+ Previous FDI projects often forecast lower demand than actual demand while recent FDI projects, especially local BCC projects, forecast demand too high compared to market developments. This situation often causes projects to have to be negotiated and readjusted during implementation, affecting VNPT's overall development plan.
Second : VNPT has a policy of purchasing too many products from joint ventures, which leads to the phenomenon of these joint ventures relying on the Vietnamese market. Some joint ventures intentionally push the selling price of products higher than the allowed level. As a result, there are products with prices higher than the selling price in foreign countries, causing the situation of still having to import the same type of domestically produced products.
Third : The issue of staff management, the qualifications of the staff assigned to participate in the management of university joint ventures are underestimated, the staff do not have enough capacity, appropriate knowledge... leading to the foreign side completely manipulating the production and business system in the joint ventures. Training activities of the projects have not really been focused on:
+ The quality of the course content is not yet commensurate with the university experience accumulated by the partner. The support of the partner in improving project management and business, increasing competitiveness has not been utilized.
+ VNPT units have not focused on and proactively learned and grasped technical and management technology in cooperation, and have not had a specific plan to take advantage of the support from partners. The units have not yet expressed their need for support and are not ready to accept changes in organization and management processes proposed by partners. The role of partners is limited (mainly arranging investment capital), so the influence of partners in investment, business and project management activities is not much.
Fourth: The organizational model for managing intra-regional BCC projects is not appropriate. The organizational model for managing intra-regional BCC projects has not yet specified the authority and responsibility of VNPT and its member units when implementing the project, so it has not stimulated the units to increase their initiative and responsibility in the process of cooperation and work implementation. This model also delays the investment process for project implementation and the implementation of business activities and service expansion of the project.
Fifth: Currently, the regulations on investment and bidding are still very complicated. In particular, the time for preparing and submitting projects for approval often takes a lot of time. The average time for preparing and submitting a project for approval is too long, in which many steps and procedures are applied mechanically, most of the time spent is mechanical time: waiting for competent authorities to complete approval procedures. In addition, applying for a license to construct a peripheral network is very difficult and time-consuming. The State and VNPT do not have a specific mechanism for implementing FDI projects. The implementation procedures and methods for implementing investment projects using BCC capital are implemented similarly to investment projects using capital from VNPT. Furthermore, when implementing investment in these projects, there must be agreement from the partner. This mechanism does not create conditions to speed up the investment progress of capital from BCC, especially in cases where the partner delays disbursement.
Some other reasons that must be mentioned are: There are still many shortcomings in the preparation stage for projects, product market orientation is not done well, the problem of resolving relationships between VNPT and FDI projects and other external relationships is not planned and has a long-term strategy...
2.3.3.2. Influence from State policy
The impact of State policies on issues such as procedures for establishing FDI projects, procedures for capital guarantees... always slow down the progress of project implementation.
FDI projects are delayed. Foreign partners always find it difficult to understand the market, encounter many problems with administrative procedures... The ever-changing policies of Vietnamese authorities also cause many difficulties for projects.
The problem of limiting investment types and the Post and Telecommunications market in the recent period has also significantly affected VNPT's ability to attract FDI.
The mechanism of two sets of laws distinguishing foreign investment and domestic investment has caused negative psychology among foreign investors.
The operations of the banking system, product brand protection agencies, patents, information and propaganda systems... are additional barriers to the difficulties in the production and business activities of FDI projects in the Post and Telecommunications sector in Vietnam.
In summary , in recent years, VNPT and 16 FDI projects have been operating stably and achieved certain results.
The basic achievements of FDI projects must be taken into account based on the following criteria: Contribution to the State Budget, Profits transferred to the Vietnamese side represented by VNPT, number of employees recruited as well as transfer of product manufacturing technologies, modern industrial management methods,
staff training...
In addition, the activities of these foreign joint ventures also give rise to a number of problems that are disadvantageous to Vietnam, such as: Slow technology transfer process, conflicts arising between the management team of Vietnamese and foreigners, products with low technology content, high prices compared to the international market, etc.
BCC contracts also have certain results such as contributions to the network, there are contracts that bring socio-economic benefits, high economic efficiency such as BCC-VTI, BCC-VMS, there are contracts that have not brought the desired results such as local BCCs, there are loss-making contracts such as card phones, texting....
All of the above problems stem from certain causes (subjective from the business side, objective from the State's policies). These causes require early and effective synchronous measures to further improve the quality of FDI projects' operations to meet the requirements and
demands of VNPT in particular and society in general.
Based on the research requirements of chapter 2, the author divides the content of chapter 2 into two major issues: VNPT and the actual situation in its operations.
FDI attraction and management; Assess the protection of Vietnam's interests in this activity and thereby find out the causes.
The author successfully described a panoramic picture of FDI activities at VNPT in the recent period.
Chapter III
Main viewpoints and solutions to ensure the benefits of attracting and managing foreign direct investment at VNPT in the period up to 2010
3.1. Viewpoints on FDI activities orientation at VNPT
3.1.1. Socio-economic environment, comparative advantages, opportunities and challenges
for VNPT's FDI
3.1.1.1. International and regional environment
The globalization trend is becoming the driving force to connect the world and regional economies, influencing each other as an integrated economy, affecting the increase in FDI investment, especially in the telecommunications industry.
Globalization and FDI have a significant impact on each other. The role of FDI is to promote globalization and vice versa, globalization is an important condition to increase the amount of FDI capital in the world. FDI is tending to increase rapidly along with the economic recovery of the Asia region . These are signals showing that FDI investment in Asia in general and Vietnam in particular will increase in the coming years.
The rapid change in telecommunications technology requires investment in new technology, which is the driving force for FDI development. The trend of reform and liberalization is taking place in many countries, in order to adapt to the rapid development of technology and services. Telecommunication technology is the convergence of telecommunications, information technology and broadcasting, which will change the structure of the telecommunications service market and network equipment. The rapid explosion of university Internet services has changed the concept of networks as well as traditional telecommunications services. Rapidly changing telecommunications technology requires VNPT to have
large investment to update and catch up with the development level of world telecommunications. The level of production and business management in the telecommunications industry is not yet commensurate with
High and modern technology requires accelerating the speed of technology transfer in the region through investment cooperation with foreign partners.
3.1.1.2. Domestic socio-economic environment and VNPT's competitive position
Although VNPT has achieved important achievements in network development, VNPT still needs to continue to invest heavily to avoid falling behind in the future. Telephone density per 100 people in Vietnam is still low compared to the world average and even lower in rural and remote areas. Therefore, it is necessary to promote investment, especially foreign investment, to help Vietnam catch up with the world's development.
The Party and State's policies and guidelines are very supportive of investment in developing national information infrastructure, creating favorable conditions for attracting FDI into the telecommunications industry.
The process of integration and opening up of Vietnam's telecommunications market also positively affects FDI attraction of the telecommunications industry in general and VNPT in particular.
2001-2003: The State plans to grant more licenses to domestic operators and promote the equitization of state-owned enterprises. Competition will become more intense in the telecommunications sector among service providers and operators such as mobile phones, Internet, VOIP and other value-added services. This also means that there will be competition in attracting FDI among service providers in Vietnam.
In 2003, domestic economic sectors were allowed to hold up to 40% of shares in enterprises providing domestic and international telephone services. Foreign investors were allowed to participate in joint ventures for basic services except for local, long-distance and international fixed-line telephones with a capital contribution of up to 30%.





