LIST OF REFERENCES
1. Dang Quoc Bao (1998), Some thoughts on team development strategy
Management staff of education serving the cause of innovation in education and training. Proceedings of the scientific conference on management staff of education facing the requirements of industrialization and modernization in Hanoi.
2. Nguyen Thanh Binh (2000), Homeroom teacher work in high school, Code: SPHNư09ư465 NCSP.
3. Set
Education and Training (2010),
Proceedings of the workshop on GVCN work in
High school, Publishing House.
4. C.Mac, F.Engels Complete Works (1993), National Political Publishing House, Hanoi.
5. D. Chalvin (1993), Management Style, Science and Technology Publishing House, Hanoi.
6. Set
Education and Training (2000),
Education and Training Development Strategy to 2020,
Publishing House, Hanoi.
7. Hoang Chung (1984) Mathematical statistical methods in educational science, Statistical Publishing House, Hanoi.
8. Scientific basis of management (1997), National Political Publishing House, Hanoi.
9. BPêxiop (1971), Theoretical foundations of universities, volume 2, Hanoi Publishing House.
10. Central School of Education Management 2 (2002), Education and Training Management Textbook, Hanoi.
11. Pham Minh Hac (1996), Ten years of educational innovation, Education Publishing House, Hanoi.
12. Pham Minh Hac (1986), Some issues on educational management and educational science, Education Publishing House, Hanoi.
13. Nguyen Khac Hien (2005),
Some
measures to strengthen management of
Principal for homeroom work in high schools in Bac Ninh province.
14. Organizational Science and Management - Some theoretical and practical issues (1999), Statistical Publishing House, Hanoi.
15. Tran Kiem (1990), Education Management and School Management, Institute of Educational Sciences, Hanoi.
16. Tran Kiem - Bui Minh Hien (2006), School Management and Leadership Textbook, Hanoi National University of Education, Hanoi.
17. Harold Koonzt Cyrill O'donnell Heinz Weihrich (2002), Essential issues of management, Science and Technology Publishing House, Hanoi
18. MIKONDACOP (1985), Problems of
Inside.
QLGD,
Central School of Management, Hanoi
19. Nguyen Van Le Ta Van Doanh (1994), Management Science, Ho Chi Minh City Publishing House.
20. Education Law (2009), National Political Publishing House, Hanoi.
21. Nguyen Huu Long, Theoretical research methods in educational science, University and Professional Education Journal No. 31995.
22. Ho Chi Minh (1997), Educational Issues, Education Publishing House, Hanoi.
23. Ha The Ngu (2001), Education, a problem of theory and practice, National University Publishing House, Hanoi.
24. Nguyen Duc Quang, Le Thanh Su, Nguyen Thi Ky (2000), Student education situations of homeroom teachers, Hanoi National University Publishing House.
25. Nguyen Ngoc Quang, Basic issues of educational management theory, Central School of Educational Management.
26. Human resource management, National Political Publishing House, Hanoi.
27. Management for the future: The 90s and beyond, Hanoi Education Publishing House.
28. Robert BlakeJ. S.Mouton (1993), Leadership is the key to success, Hanoi Trade Center.
29. Nguyen Ba Son (2000), Some basic issues on management science.
30. Ha Nhat Thang (2001), Working methods of high school homeroom teachers, Hanoi National University Publishing House.
31. Ha Nhat Thang, Nguyen Duc Quang, Nguyen Thi Ky (1998),
GVCN in high school, Publishing House of Education.
Collaborate
32. Information on education management and training (2001), Hanoi School of Education Management Cadres.
33. Thai Duy Tuyen (1999) Basic issues of modern education, Education Publishing House, Hanoi.
34. Duong Thieu Tong (2000)
Statistical
applications in scientific research
Study of Education, National Economics University Publishing House, Hanoi.
35. Nguyen Quang Uan (1999), General Psychology, Hanoi Education Publishing House.
36. Documents of the Hanoi National Conference.
th time
2 Central Committee, 8th term (1997), Political Publishing House
37. Pham Viet Vuong (2001) Education, Hanoi National University Publishing House, Hanoi.
38. Pham Viet Vuong (2001), Scientific research methodology,
Hanoi National University Publishing House, Hanoi.
39. 39 Nguyen Thi Phi Yen (2001), Studying the role of State management in
Promoting human factor, National Political Publishing House, Hanoi.
40. Bonderep NI (1984) Education, Moscow,
Main working method
class assignment, Publishing House
Appendix 1
Data tables investigating the current status of homeroom management
Table 2.6. Perception of the role of class teachers in student education management
Reply
Management staff | Teacher | |||
Quantity | Percentage | Quantity | Percentage | |
Very important | 13 | 100 % | 76 | 97.44 % |
Important | 0 | 0 % | 2 | 2.56 % |
Less important | 0 | 0 % | 0 | 0 % |
Not important | 0 | 0 % | 0 | 0 % |
Maybe you are interested!
-
Managing the activities of the professional team of Trung Van high school, Nam Tu Liem district - Hanoi in the context of educational innovation - 1 -
Deviant Behavior of PCT Group in High School Students (%, N=448) -
Current Status of Applying Multiple Intelligence Theory in Teaching History at Olympia Inter-level High School -
Fostering students' self-study ability in teaching some knowledge of Mechanics and Electromagnetism in high school Physics with the support of social network Facebook - 21 -
Theory on Implementing Support Policy for High School Students in Particularly Difficult Communes

Table 2.7. Causes that directly negatively affect students' moral education
STT
Reason | Approved | Proportion % | |
1 | The social environment where students live is not good. | 63 | 80.8 |
2 | The family living environment is not good. | 68 | 87.2 |
3 | Parents do not care | 73 | 93.6 |
4 | Parents of students who are social evils | 67 | 85.9 |
5 | Students compete with bad guys | 73 | 93.6 |
6 | GVCN does not care, has no teaching methods | 49 | 62.8 |
7 | The discipline of the class and school is not good. | 48 | 61.5 |
8 | Poor students are bored with studying and follow bad things. | 69 | 88.5 |
9 | The school's management of the homeroom teacher is not good. | 38 | 48.7 |
10 | The influence of movies | 62 | 79.5 |
11 | School education is not good | 33 | 42.3 |
12 | Other issues | 26 | 33.3 |
Table 2.9. Difficulties in the process of moral education for students.
STT
Common difficulties | Approved | Proportion % | |
1 | My personal SP behavior skills are still limited. | 37 | 47.4 |
2 | Limited skills in organizing activities for students | 44 | 56.4 |
Lack of cooperation of students' parents | 36 | 46.2 | |
4 | No time to visit students' homes | 37 | 47.4 |
5 | Difficulty in meeting students' parents | 38 | 48.7 |
6 | Students have to study a lot, it is difficult to organize extracurricular activities. | 32 | 41.0 |
7 | Lack of coordination of subject teachers | 11 | 14.1 |
8 | Lack of assistance from the President or Vice President | 7 | 9.0 |
9 | The class has too many slow students. | 41 | 52.6 |
10 | My knowledge and methods of student management and education are still limited. | 29 | 37.2 |
11 | Students do not love their homeroom teacher. | 9 | 11.5 |
12 | The school's youth union is weak. | 7 | 9.0 |
13 | Social environment and community influence the educational process. | 46 | 59.0 |
14 | Other opinions | 9 | 11.5 |
3
Table 2.10. Conditions for ensuring student education management
STT
Condition | Approved | Percentage | |
1 | Good social environment, little negative impact on students | 66 | 84.6 |
2 | The school is always disciplined, orderly, and has good traditions. | 76 | 97.4 |
3 | The school has made significant progress in the emulation movement "Building a friendly school, active students". | 75 | 96.2 |
4 | Parents often take an active interest in their children's education. | 75 | 96.2 |
5 | The school regularly pays attention to fostering content and teaching methods for students for teachers in the spirit of innovation. | 74 | 94.9 |
6 | The school focuses on assigning work reasonably and creating time for homeroom teachers. | 73 | 93.6 |
7 | Enough time for teachers to do their homeroom work | 65 | 83.3 |
8 | Special policies for GVCN | 60 | 76.9 |
Table 2.13.1. Homeroom teachers' opinions on activities during class time
STT
Activities | Approved | Percentage | |
1 | The teacher presents the achievements and results of the week of the students and the whole class, asking students to try harder and promote the results and achievements that have been achieved. | 50 | 64.1 |
2 | The teacher reviews the students' shortcomings and the class's shortcomings during the week, and the students listen. | 44 | 56.4 |
3 | The teacher introduces and guides next week's work, students listen. | 46 | 59.0 |
4 | The class officer summarizes the achievements, shortcomings, and limitations of the students and the whole class during the week. | 58 | 74.4 |
5 | The class officer directs each student with shortcomings to self-criticize, present a plan to correct the shortcomings, and other students give comments. | 51 | 65.4 |
6 | Class officers praise students' achievements in class and trust the results of students' correction of shortcomings. | 43 | 55.1 |
7 | The class officer deploys next week's work and organizes for students to discuss how to do it. | 56 | 71.8 |
8 | Class officers organize cultural activities. | 63 | 80.8 |
9 | Many students actively participate in activities. | 35 | 44.9 |
10 | Teachers sit and listen and observe students. | 49 | 62.8 |
11 | GVCN conclusion | 65 | 83.3 |
12 | Other activities: | 13 | 16.7 |
Table 2.13.2. Students' opinions on activities during class time
STT
Activities | Approved | Proportion % | |
1 | Teachers comment on class situation during the week | 131 | 91.6 |
2 | The teacher directly reviews each student who has shortcomings during the week, the students sit and listen; the teacher admonishes the students. | 98 | 68.5 |
other friends | |||
3 | Each student with shortcomings self-criticizes and presents a plan for correction under the direction of the class officer; the teacher gently analyzes and gives instructions on how to correct the mistakes. | 119 | 83.2 |
4 | The teacher introduces and guides next week's work, while students listen. | 121 | 84.6 |
5 | Let the class officers (Youth Union officers) deploy the work for next week and organize for students to discuss how to do it. | 107 | 74.8 |
6 | The class officer comments and evaluates the situation of the class last week, praises the achievements of students in the class, organizes the review of students with shortcomings, then the teacher comments and concludes. | 121 | 84.6 |
7 | Organize cultural activities | 92 | 64.3 |
8 | Class officers control class activities, teachers observe, guide, encourage activities and draw conclusions. | 103 | 72.0 |
Table 2.14. Measures to grasp student situation
STT
How to | Approved | Proportion % | |
1 | Daily monitor student activities in class | 55 | 70.5 |
2 | Information from the class staff | 77 | 98.7 |
3 | Information from subject teachers | 78 | 100.0 |
4 | Information from the Red Flag team of the School Youth Union | 72 | 92.3 |
5 | Information from the logbook | 78 | 100.0 |
6 | Information from normal students in the class | 65 | 83.3 |
7 | Information from parents | 71 | 91.0 |
Table 2.15. Common tasks of homeroom teachers with their homeroom classes
STT
Job | Approved | Proportion % | |
1 | Call parents to discuss student situation | 75 | 96.2 |
Visit students' homes to discuss their situation | 42 | 53.8 | |
3 | Meet parents at school | 77 | 98.7 |
4 | Receive parents at home | 5 | 6.4 |
5 | Visit class irregularly to grasp students' situation and urge them | 67 | 85.9 |
6 | Meet privately with students with shortcomings to review and correct them. | 77 | 98.7 |
7 | Make a work plan, plan to organize student activities next week | 69 | 88.5 |
8 | Record student status monitoring results | 77 | 98.7 |
9 | Regularly praise, encourage, motivate students, and inspire student achievements. | 76 | 97.4 |
10 | Other jobs: | 10 | 12.8 |
2
STT | Expressions of students | Approved | Proportion % |
1 | Be bold, approachable and confide in your homeroom teacher. | 56 | 71.8 |
2 | Afraid, not daring to get close, never confiding in GVCN | 12 | 15.4 |
3 | Cover up flaws, don't want GVCN to know | 20 | 25.6 |
4 | Fight frankly, honestly report shortcomings | 41 | 52.6 |
5 | Unity and mutual support | 69 | 88.5 |
6 | Factionalism, often disunity | 3 | 3.8 |
7 | Most students follow class and school rules well. | 73 | 93.6 |
8 | Other symptoms: | 2 | 2.6 |
Table 2.16. 1. Opinions of homeroom teachers on the manifestations of the relationship between homeroom teachers and students in building the class collective.
STT | Content | Approved | Percentage |
1 | Strict, fair and friendly with students | 101 | 70.6 |
2 | Strict and fair but students are still afraid to approach | 35 | 24.5 |
Table 2.16.2. Students' opinions on the relationship between homeroom teachers and students and building class collectives
close | |||
3 | Understand and sympathize with students | 86 | 60.1 |
4 | Little understanding and sympathy for students | 33 | 23.1 |
5 | Often instruct wholeheartedly, analyze good things and right reasons for students | 91 | 63.6 |
6 | Often organizes very fun and useful activities for students. | 55 | 38.5 |
7 | Regularly monitor closely to detect and handle students who violate the rules. | 99 | 69.2 |
8 | Never forgive students who violate the rules. | 12 | 8.4 |
9 | Teachers know which students violate the rules and sometimes they sympathize and forgive students who violate the rules if there is a valid reason. | 102 | 71.3 |
10 | The class monitor guides the class activities in a very profound, gentle and thoughtful manner. | 72 | 50.3 |
11 | Live class activities, heavy class atmosphere | 42 | 29.4 |
12 | Students only fear teachers but have little respect for them. | 24 | 16.8 |
13 | Students respect and love their teachers. | 99 | 69.2 |





