topsoil and then drop the tree in, or even in places where it is easy to dig a hole, the planting hole is rarely dug to the correct size according to the design.
4.5. Analysis of technical and policy gaps of Project 661 applied in Hoa Binh province
4.5.1. Technical gap analysis
4.5.1.1. Plant breeding work:
Maybe you are interested!
-
Identify Rating Levels and Rating Scales
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism,quan lan,quang ninh,ecology,ecotourism,minh chau,van don,geography,geographical basis,tourism development,science
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
of the islanders. Therefore, this indicator will be divided into two sub-indicators:
a1. Natural tourism attractiveness a2. Cultural tourism attractiveness
b. Tourist capacity
The two island communes in Quan Lan have different capacities to receive tourists. Minh Chau Commune is home to many standard hotels and resorts, attracting high-income domestic and international tourists. Meanwhile, Quan Lan Commune has many motels mainly built and operated by local people, so the scale and quality are not high, and will be suitable for ordinary tourists such as students.
c. Time of exploitation of Quan Lan Island Commune:
Quan Lan tourism is seasonal due to weather and climate conditions and festivals only take place on certain days of the year, specifically in spring. In Quan Lan commune, the period from April to June and from September to November is considered the best time to visit Quan Lan because the cultural tourism activities are mainly associated with festivals taking place during this time.
Minh Chau island commune:
Tourism exploitation time is all year round, because this is a place with a number of tourist attractions with diverse ecosystems such as Bai Tu Long National Park Research Center, Tram forest, Turtle Laying Beach, so besides coming to the beach for tourism and vacation in the summer, Minh Chau will attract research groups to come for tourism combined with research at other times of the year.
d. Sustainability
The sustainability of ecotourism sites in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes depends on the sensitivity of the ecosystems to climate changes.
landscape. In general, these tourist destinations have a fairly high level of sustainability, because they are natural ecosystems, planned and protected. However, if a large number of tourists gather at certain times, it can exceed the carrying capacity and affect the sustainability of the environment (polluted beaches, damaged trees, animals moving away from their habitats, etc.), then the sustainability of the above ecosystems (natural ecosystems, human ecosystems) will also be affected and become less sustainable.
e. Location and accessibility
Both island communes have ports to take tourists to visit from Van Don wharf:
- Quan Lan – Van Don traffic route:
Phuc Thinh – Viet Anh high-speed boat and Quang Minh high-speed boat, depart at 8am and 2pm from Van Don to Quan Lan, and at 7am and 1pm from Quan Lan to Van Don. There are also wooden boats departing at 7am and 1pm.
- Van Don - Minh Chau traffic route:
Chung Huong high-speed train, Minh Chau train, morning 7:30 and afternoon 13:30 from Van Don to Minh Chau, morning 6:30 and afternoon 13:00 from Minh Chau to Van Don.
f. Infrastructure
Despite receiving investment attention, the issue of infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism on Quan Lan Island is still an issue that needs to be resolved because it has a direct impact on the implementation of ecotourism activities. The minimum conditions for serving tourists such as accommodation, electricity, water, communication, especially medical services, and security work need to be given top priority. Ecotourism spots in Minh Chau commune are assessed to have better infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism because there are quite complete and synchronous conditions for serving tourists, meeting many needs of domestic and foreign tourists.
3.2.1.4. Determine assessment levels and assessment scales
Corresponding to the levels of each criterion, the index is the score of those levels in the order of 4, 3, 2, 1 decreasing according to the standard of each level: very attractive (4), attractive (3), average (2), less attractive (1).
3.2.1.5. Determining the coefficients of the criteria
For the assessment of DLST in the two communes of Quan Lan and Minh Chau islands, the students added evaluation coefficients to show the importance of the criteria and indicators as follows:
Coefficient 3 with criteria: Attractiveness, Exploitation time. These are the 2 most important criteria for attracting tourists to tourism in general and eco-tourism in particular, so they have the highest coefficient.
Coefficient 2 with criteria: Capacity, Infrastructure, Location and accessibility . Because the assessment area is an island commune of Van Don district, the above criteria are selected by the author with appropriate coefficients at the average level.
Coefficient 1 with criteria: Sustainability. Quan Lan has natural and human-made ecotourism sites, with high biodiversity and little impact from local human factors. Most of the ecotourism sites are still wild, so they are highly sustainable.
3.2.1.6. Results of DLST assessment on Quan Lan island
a. Assessment of the potential for natural tourism development
For Minh Chau commune:
+ Natural tourism attractiveness is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined as average (2 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of Capacity criterion is 2 x 2 = 4.
+ Exploitation time is long (4 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Exploitation time criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is assessed as good (3 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 3 x 2 = 6 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Minh Chau commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 4 + 12 + 4 + 4 + 6 = 42 points
Similar assessment for Quan Lan commune, we have the following table:
Table 3.3: Assessment of the potential for natural ecotourism development in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of self-tourismof course
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
CommuneMinh Chau
12
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
42/52
Quan CommuneLan
6
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
33/52
b. Assessment of the potential for humanistic tourism development
For Quan Lan commune:
+ The attractiveness of human tourism is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined to be large (3 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Capacity criterion is 3 x 2 = 6.
+ Mining time is average (3 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Mining time criterion is 3 x 3 = 9.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points.
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is rated as average (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Quan Lan commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 6 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 4 = 36 points.
Similar assessment with Minh Chau commune we have the following table:
Table 3.4: Assessment of the potential for developing humanistic eco-tourism in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of human tourismliterature
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Quan CommuneLan
12
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
39/52
Minh CommuneChau
6
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
36/52
Basically, both Minh Chau and Quan Lan localities have quite favorable conditions for developing ecotourism. However, Quan Lan commune has more advantages to develop ecotourism in a humanistic direction, because this is an area with many famous historical relics such as Quan Lan Communal House, Quan Lan Pagoda, Temple worshiping the hero Tran Khanh Du, ... along with local festivals held annually such as the wind praying ceremony (March 15), Quan Lan festival (June 10-19); due to its location near the port and long exploitation time, the beaches in Quan Lan commune (especially Quan Lan beach) are no longer hygienic and clean to ensure the needs of tourists coming to relax and swim; this is also an area with many beautiful landscapes such as Got Beo wind pass, Ong Phong head, Voi Voi cave, but the ability to access these places is still very limited (dirt hill road, lots of gravel and rocks), especially during rainy and windy times; In addition, other natural resources such as mangrove forests and sea worms have not been really exploited for tourism purposes and ecotourism development. On the contrary, Minh Chau commune has more advantages in developing ecotourism in the direction of natural tourism, this is an area with diverse ecosystems such as at Rua De Beach, Bai Tu Long National Park Conservation Center...; Minh Chau beach is highly appreciated for its natural beauty and cleanliness, ranked in the top ten most beautiful beaches in Vietnam; Minh Chau commune is also home to Tram forest with a large area and a purity of up to 90%, suitable for building bridges through the forest (a very effective type of natural ecotourism currently applied by many countries) for tourists to sightsee, as well as for the purpose of studying and researching.
Figure 3.1: Thenmala Forest Bridge (India) Source: https://www.thenmalaecotourism.com/(August 21, 2019)
3.2.2. Using SWOT matrix to evaluate Quan Lan island tourism
General assessment of current tourism activities of Quan Lan island is shown through the following SWOT matrix:
Table 3.5: SWOT matrix evaluating tourism activities on Quan Lan island
Internal agent
Strengths- There is a lot of potential for tourism development, especially natural ecotourism and humanistic ecotourism.- The unskilled labor force is relatively abundant.- resource environmentunpolluted, still
Weaknesses- Poorly developed infrastructure, especially traffic routes to tourist destinations on the island.- The team of professional staff is still weak.- Tourism products in general
quite wild, originalintact
general and DLST in particularalone is monotonous.
External agents
Opportunity- Tourism is a key industry in the socio-economic development strategy of the province and Van Don economic zone.- Quan Lan was selected as a pilot area for eco-tourism development within the framework of the green growth project between Quang Ninh province and the Japanese organization JICA.- The flow of tourists and especially ecotourism in the world tends toincreasing
Challenge- Weather and climate change abnormally.- Competition in tourism products is increasingly fierce, especially with other localities in the province such as Ha Long, Mong Cai...- Awareness of tourists, especially domestic tourists, about ecotourism and nature conservation is not high.
Through summary analysis using SWOT matrix we see that:
To exploit strengths and take advantage of opportunities, it is necessary to:
- Diversify products and service types (build more tourism routes aimed at specific needs of tourists: experiential tourism immersed in nature, spiritual cultural tourism...)
- Effective exploitation of resources and differentiated products (natural resources and human resources)
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: #0D0D0D; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -3pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Symbol, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:Wingdings; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:Cambria, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: #212121; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
Evaluation of the effectiveness of the Forest Environmental Services Payment Policy on forest management and protection, improving people's lives in the Cua Dat Hydropower Plant Basin in Thanh Hoa province, period from 2012-2016 - 13 -
Impact of Technical Measures of Protective Forest Planting on Some Groups of Site Types in Coastal Sand Areas -
Analysis of the Impact of the Factor "Bank's Credit Policy" -
Forest Protection and Development Plan for the 2016-2020 Period, with a Vision to 2030
+ In Hoa Binh, the regulations on forestry seed management have not been fully implemented, so the quality of the seedling sources put into production in recent years has not been guaranteed, the seed sources have not been inspected, and some seed production facilities have not been registered for business. The management of forestry seedling varieties still has many shortcomings, and the origin and source of the seeds put into protective forest planting have not been fully checked, so although the area of protective forest has increased significantly, the quality of the planted forest is still low. There is no clear planning of the nursery system, so the planting of seedlings is still scattered, everyone does their own thing (especially the private sector), local authorities cannot manage quantity and quality, so they are often passive about seeds, and there is a conflict between supply and demand because no unit has grasped the annual needs of protective forest planting. Regulations on seed management have been issued but are difficult to implement in practice, especially the management of native tree varieties. The reason for this problem is that the current source of native tree seedlings is taken from natural forests through collection by people because the seed forests are not able to provide enough. Therefore, it is also necessary to consider specifically and make appropriate regulations in the actual conditions of the locality.
+ The quality of forestry seeds used for forest planting is still limited. Forestry companies and management boards have to complete their assigned tasks every year, so the forest planting work still follows the plan. Many production facilities and project management boards often sow seedlings late (after Tet, seedlings are sown while in June - July, they have to plant forests).
Planting trees that are not old enough affects the survival rate and growth ability, especially for native trees. In particular, the Lac Son District Project Management Board also bought damaged bamboo seedlings from Thanh Hoa and brought them back to plant, leading to the failure of bamboo planting models. In addition, hybrid Acacia trees have poor resistance to storms, leading to many trees falling down. Moreover, in newly planted areas, Acacia species are bitten by crickets, killing the trees, so many replantings are required.
+ Because the plan is often delivered late, the seed preparation stage is slow, leading to low standards of seedlings for forest planting, especially native trees.
+ The varieties put into production are mainly traditional varieties, not applying new varieties with high productivity that have been recognized in recent years.
+ In remote areas, the large size of the seedling pots makes it difficult to transport seedlings.
4.5.1.2. Tree species and protective forest planting models applied:
+ In Hoa Binh, there is a lack of specific technical instructions for each mixed crop species in each model and associated with each site condition and each specific region.
+ Crop structure must be based on natural conditions and site conditions of each region, however, this has not been satisfactorily resolved. The selection of crop structure is shown in Decision No. 661/QD-TTg dated July 29, 1998 of the Prime Minister. The Government assigned localities to select and then submit to the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development for approval based on research results, site conditions and opinions of relevant local agencies.
However, in Hoa Binh, studies on the above issues are still very few, mainly based on practical experience, lacking sufficient scientific basis, so the persuasiveness is not high. Therefore, the crop structure in some localities is not yet
In accordance with site conditions, the current status of protective forests shows that most of the supporting trees overwhelm the main crops (native trees), leading to poor growth and elimination of the main trees.
+ The assessment of land and site is almost not fully implemented, the Department of Agriculture and Rural Development, the Forestry Department and the Management Board of Project 661 have not paid due attention, so the selection of crop structure according to the principle "Soil, tree" has not been thoroughly applied. Therefore, there is a lack of basis in choosing suitable plant species for the soil conditions of each place. There are two reasons leading to the above situation:
Firstly , at the beginning of the Central Project, there was no adequate guidance and investment in site assessment and tree selection activities in the forest planting design activities.
Second, the capacity of local forestry staff is still limited, so the selection of crop structure based on site is not yet satisfactory.
+ The selection of tree species in the grassroots projects still faces many difficulties. The issue of selecting tree species suitable for the site conditions for each forest planting location has not been given adequate attention. The selection of tree species is often guided by the Project Management Board staff to the people, while the Board staff lack both professional qualifications and manpower. Due to the remote and isolated areas, the conditions for the Board's technical staff to have practical contact and select tree species are still limited. Therefore, in many places, the selected trees are not suitable for the site conditions, so their growth and development are slow.
+ The experimental planting of some new plant species lacks scientific basis and is mainly based on experience.
+ Currently, in some models, people arbitrarily plant Acacia mangium into the model (not included in the design). This is a fast-growing tree species, and after just a few years it will become the main canopy layer of the model.
With the already high planting density, adding newly planted Acacia will cause great competition in these models, greatly affecting the growth of the main protective crops.
Photo 4.9: People themselves plant Acacia auriculiformis in the model of Luong + Green Lim in Tu Ne - Tan Lac
+ The structure of forest planting models of many Project Management Boards is still poor, each Board only focuses on planting a few models, so the models are not diverse, not fully promoting the forest planting models of the province. Synonymous with that, many promising models in many areas have been ignored or have not had the opportunity to demonstrate.
+ The selection of plants and models is still imposed, people have little opportunity to choose the models they like while this is a very important issue related to people's awareness of building, caring for and protecting forests.
4.5.1.3. Forest planting density and planting method:
+ In general, applying mainly the same density type for all different models and different tree species is not suitable because the tree species and models
Different shapes have very different characteristics. There is no regulation on planting density for each specific site condition.
+ Up to now, it is still unclear whether the main protective crops should be planted at the same time or later than the supporting crops.

+ Many silvicultural models do not comply with the technical design of the arrangement of trees in the model. Especially in some places, planting too close together between the rows of supporting trees and the rows of main protective trees will cause early competition, the native trees are overwhelmed by the supporting trees, and slow growth.
develop as in the models
Photo 4.10: Green Lim is planted too close to Acacia auriculiformis in Van Son - Lac Son
Mixed green Lim + Acacia auriculiformis, Bamboo + Flowered larch.
+ The size of the planting hole is not dug as designed, especially in places where the soil is dry and hard and difficult to dig, people only dig very small holes, just enough to put the tree in, thus greatly affecting the survival rate and growth of the plant.
+ The density and arrangement of forest planting are still too monotonous, stereotyped for all tree species, mixed types while the characteristics of each model are different and the planting site conditions are also very different. If considered in terms of technique, the applied silvicultural models are only divided into 2 main groups: technical measures for planting mixed bamboo with native trees and planting mixed supporting trees with main crops. In particular, in the technical measures for planting mixed trees
In order to support the main crop, it is unreasonable to design a common planting technique for all plant species. This is unreasonable because different models have different growth characteristics, and on different types of sites, the applied techniques also need to be different to suit each type of site.
+ The density of forest planting is still too dense, especially in the mixed model of native trees and supporting trees, 2 native trees are only 2m apart from supporting trees, 2 supporting trees are 1.6m apart. Due to the characteristics of native trees, they only grow slowly in the first 3 years, then need to gradually open their canopy to grow, but in reality, because the trees are planted too densely, at about 4 or 5 years old, it is necessary to thin out the canopy for native trees, while the supporting tree is Acacia auriculiformis, but the size of the supporting tree is not yet suitable for commercial timber, while if used as firewood, it is very wasteful. Therefore, planting too densely as designed will lead to the situation where it is a pity to remove the supporting trees, but if left, it will suppress the main crop.
4.5.1.4. Exploitation and thinning of supporting trees:
+ The biggest technical gap in localities in general and Hoa Binh in particular is guidance on thinning of supporting trees in mixed forest planting models of supporting trees and main crops. Supporting trees have had the effect of shading native trees in the early years, but now main crops are being overwhelmed by supporting trees, leading to poor growth and elimination of main crops. The Forestry Department has issued 2 regulations guiding the thinning and exploitation of supporting trees according to Decision No. 1053/LN -SDR dated August 23, 2006 on the exploitation of protective forests under Program 327 and Project 661; Decision No. 1697/LN-LS dated December 19, 2005 on guidance on cutting, nurturing and exploiting, thinning supporting trees for protective forests of Project 327 and 661, but in Hoa Binh there are still no specific instructions or implementation according to these instructions. On the other hand, if there is no instruction
In many places, people still arbitrarily enter the forest to cut down trees, breaking, knocking down and killing many main protective trees.
+ Technical guidance documents have not reached foresters, especially households that invest their own capital to plant forests. While the trend of socializing forestry is growing stronger.
4.5.2. Policy gap analysis
- The current system of forestry officers in the province is still very lacking, especially the grassroots project staff. The staff of the grassroots project management boards is very thin, each board has only 4-6 people, including 1 head, 1 deputy head, 1 technical officer and 1 accountant. To implement the project to the people, the boards must hire additional contract officers to be in charge of the communes, in which each officer must be in charge of many communes. Because the communes currently no longer have a commune forestry board (there is only a vice chairman in charge of the agriculture and forestry sector), implementing the project to the people is facing many difficulties.
- After the end of the forest planting and care period, the forest area is handed over to the commune and the people for protection, the 661 project management board has no further rights and responsibilities. While currently, according to the new planning of 3 types of forests of the province, many areas of planted protective forests are converted to production forests, at that time it is very difficult to maintain the area of native trees such as green Lim, Lat Hoa,... planted in this area.
- The investment rate for 1 hectare of protective forest has been adjusted but is still too low and slow to change according to market price fluctuations. In 2000 it was 2.5 million VND/ha; in 2003 it was adjusted to 4 million VND/ha, in 2008 it was adjusted to 6 million VND/ha. The low investment rate makes the labor cost too cheap compared to the market price. This leads to a conflict between the requirement of high quality of planted forest and too low labor cost, so in most Management Boards people cannot comply.
The 661 Project has not really attracted people to participate in the Project, in many places people only participate in the Project when they have nothing else to do.
- The same investment rate is still applied to all types of models on all types of sites with different forest planting conditions. This is completely contrary to production practice when on different types of sites, the ability to successfully plant forests is also very different, so to ensure successful forest planting in places with difficult site conditions such as harsh climate, high slope, degraded land, difficult travel, etc., the investment rate must be higher than in other places. From that reality, in many places, people only accept to plant protective forests in places that are easy to plant, while in more difficult places, very few forests are planted or if planted, the ability to become forests is very limited. Therefore, in some places, it has led to the phenomenon of production forest land being planned for protective forests to take advantage of State capital.
- Applying a closed mechanism according to regulations from top to bottom. The regulation of investment rate for each type of model should be based on the price of labor and materials for that model based on each specific forest planting condition, but in many places in Hoa Binh, the opposite is true. The regulation of labor and materials prices is adjusted to match the investment rate that has been given in advance. Therefore, the adjustment of material and labor prices in the models is often subjective and imposed, not suitable for reality. Even digging holes to plant trees with dimensions of 40x40x40 cm or 50x50x50 or 60x60x60 cm does not depend on technical requirements but is the basis for adjustment to match the total investment rate for 1 hectare. However, in reality, with labor prices being too low, forest planters can rarely dig holes to plant trees with the above dimensions.
- Acceptance is still too heavy on design, in many places people grow honey





